Відео

@@Will_Speed thank you! 🙏🙏 Next recipe for me is that Reggie Porta! Looks stunning!

@@nativestrong7253 go to 3:15 where I said I used the 18-120 F4. Stop making excuses for fujifilm and accept the fact that Fuji made a mistake in their latest firmware update. Making a mistake is totally fine but taking months to fix it is NOT ok! Also my viltrox and tamron lenses perform BETTER in AFC and AFS than my Fuji lenses.

@@mutonchops1 i don’t think it will work because the diameter of the lenses are different. I think the 16-55mm is a bit bigger. You might be able to add something in between the zoom ring and the lens to fill that gap. Also I think the 16-80 extends a bit more when zooming so you might hit the front glass of the housing. I think they make a housing for the 16-80 if I’m not mistaken.

@@stormshadow9 I’m glad you like the video!

@@crashyyy4116 I’m glad you like it 🙏👍🏻

@@KostasUA-cam thank you! I tried to make it quick with no fuss! Thanks for watching!

@@johnsavagecrypto 13mm viltrox f1.4

@@Hyped007 man that’s a really tough one! To me cinema level quality means really good dynamic range. I think for that price range the fx3 is honestly king! It does video very very well.

@@gsfpv it has not improved unfortunately. Honestly the image quality is the only thing keeping me with Fuji.

@@adnan_velic argh... the XH2s is so cheap now too... under 1500 on ebay... but need reliability first of all... selling all my fuji gear for a A7S3 with a 24-70 is mighty appealing...

@@adnan_velic Such a shame. The XH2s going for 1.5k on ebay... but need reliability. May move to Sony A7s3...

@@investigativechannel7698 totally agree with you 🤝🏼

@@mikeexplores_the_world8895 oh man it really is! Do you ever shoot in ProRes? I just recently started and wow the way you can grade that footage is pretty unbelievable!

@@adnan_velic I will try, need a big cf express card to shoot in ProRes ! Sad we do not see lots of video footage of the xh2 on UA-cam. Maybe you could share a say ProRes xh2 video !

@@seckinsahin I wouldn’t recommend this for low light video work. Although the xh2s is very good all the way up to 10000 iso with davinci noise reduction I would go with a f2.8 or 1.4 for extremely low light work which I do a lot of.

​@@adnan_velic Obviously I'm going to start with one lens, it's all about the video for me. I want to get different frames with a single lens. That's why I'm considering the 18-120mm lens. I'll buy x-s20 as a camera. Would you recommend it for someone under these conditions?

@@seckinsahinjust saw your comment! The xs20 is a really nice camera and it has good high iso performance like the xt4 with the same sensor. I would recommend you look into the 16-55mm f2.8 used. That was my first serious lens for the Fuji system. I still use that lens it’s amazing and good in low light. You can also reframe footage when you shoot in 6.2k using the xs20 so even if you get a prime like a 23mm f1.4 you’ll be able to zoom into the footage 2x and it will still look really nice.

@@ZeitouniJad the sensor is incredible I totally agree! I do hope they fix the AF very very soon!

@@VictorReynolds never heard of vsco! Gotta check that out thank you!

@@DileoFilms to be completely honest I think with some customized adjustments you might be able to do it! The housing I had and the lens housing combo was specifically made for the 10-24mm f4. There is a small knob you turn to adjust focal length. You might be able to move that gear and place it around the focus ring and use that same knob to pull focus!

Cheers! ​@@adnan_velic

@@dandanu2526 it’s terrible I agree! I just did a shoot with it again on Sunday same pulsing BS!

@@adnan_velic I was curious to find out what it's like to use a full frame sensor, so I changed the system and migrated to Sony. After three weeks of using the Sony A7III together with Sigma 135 mm 1.8 and Sigma 65 mm f 2 I realized that there are quite big problems regarding AF-on...many of the photos when I got home and downloaded them to the computer were blurry...they appeared clearly on the viewfinder of the camera but on the computer they were blurry...I tried all the AF modes and I realized that that square was not always placed on the eye and when this happened, the effectiveness was zero. This led me to the final conclusion...Fujifilm xs 10 that I had worked with in the past, as well as the XT30II were very good cameras with a decent AF that I gave up far too easily for the big sensor from Sony ..now I ordered my Fuji XT5, I found it at a very good price, brand new at the price of 1200 euros ..I hope everything will be ok, given that I don't have exaggerated requirements regarding autofocus...

@@kedrednael and they STILL haven’t fixed the autofocus!!!

@@lexgraham man! I think I need to go back and just say F the reala ace and red record box.

@@TheMacMurphy is the AF on the s5iix much better than the xh2s?

@@NdooleAbbasMaella same here 🤞🤞

@@UnseenSamy hopefully this year!

@@alansarpy I like it man! 6k sensor would mean 18mp minimum if I’m not mistaken? That would make it a little worse in low light. That 3 base ISO would be crazy! Definitely looking forward to these new cameras coming out soon I hope.

@@adnan_velic They could keep the 12megaix and good with it... sometimes you need a boost in ISO but not 12,800 worth and that image gets a little soft with all the internal noise reduction... I shoot real estate among other things, and the dynamic range on the a7siii/ fx3 sensor is pretty incredible ... I would really like the fx3ii just to have more cinema features, but that LCD screen is a joke.... Sony could literally fix what the people want and have a camera that slows everyone away... I think shooting RAW is awesome, but there tons of shows on TV filmed on 10 bit 4:2:2 and the image looks amazing.... I also want them to come out with. fx2 that you have an option of buying with or without a top handle... I like the current top handle but it makes a ton of handling noise

@@adnan_velicgood chatting with you ... Camera gear is fun to talk about especially for video shooters

@@alansarpyhell yeah man 🤝🏼 12mp is enough I totally agree there. Would be nice if it got ProRes for me it runs better on my Mac and it has so much data in it the image looks phenomenal.

@@adnan_velic that would be cool .. I tried recording pro res into a atomos what a pain

@@iaincphotography6051 no this is a common video AF issue. Look at the comment section a lot of people are seeing this.

@@annoholics totally agree with you for the most part but the fx6 bodies do have more connections and customization that make it more suitable for larger production applications. You can of course rig out the fx3 but then you’re coming closer to the fx6 price so why not just get the fx6 at that point? I just feel like every time I start hearing about rumors making its way around UA-cam a new camera release is definitely happening. You could be right it may be a fx6 mark 2 to compete with the c400 but me personally I believe it will be an fx3 mark 2 to crush the z6iii and the new canon small body cameras.

@@adnan_velic Sure, larger productions might benefit from several features of the FX-6 or FX-9, but how much bigger do you want to go than "The Creator"? I think most FX-3 camera's will be used by e.g. wedding videographers or perhaps as a backup camera for somebody that normaly uses an FX-6. Also a lot of the bigger UA-camrs use the FX-3. I think even a lot of smaller videographers decide to go for the FX-6 because their clients want to see a "real professionals cinema camera" and not some kind of "photo camera". I think most smaller videographers will do just fine with the FX-3. Global shutter, insane dynamic range, and internal RAW are of course very nice to have, but I would expect that more in the higher price range then in the FX-3 mk2. None of the Sony cinema cameras have these features combined, so imho it would be strange to find that in the most budget version of cinema cameras and not in the higher-end models. I think it would be hard to explain to the Venice customers that they have to go to the FX-3 mk2 if they want global shutter.

But that’s how technology goes… it becomes smaller and more powerful. Just because 1 movie was made using the fx3 doesn’t make the fx6 or fx9 obsolete NOW. Those bigger body cameras are production ready I’m not talking about image quality they all use the same sensor that’s not my point. It’s the easy of being able to plug in a bunch of things and having larger batteries connect right into the body instead of having to rig out an fx3. Things become better over time. The fx3 ii even with all the features I stated will not replace a Venice or a current fx6 for people who need the ports and the ease of production integration. There are people who use older RED cameras and old ARRIS even though on paper the new Sony cameras are amazing it’s not about that it’s about reliability and familiarity with the camera. This is just my opinion and I respect what you’re saying.

I mean cameras cheaper than the a7iv and a7siii has some better features that Sony is not bringing to the more expensive cameras.

@@kouleeofficial THIS! The bigger cameras are about 100% reliability and workflow integration. It’s not about being feature packed with AI stuff….

@@jcar4522 Sony makes amazing cameras indeed

@@GunnarBjarki-nw2oi I hear you on that. Was thinking about a fx3 to buy personally but with all these cameras releasing this year I’m going to wait a little longer and see.

@@adnan_velic ye absolutely, I was going to do the same, but I waited a few months and I finally decided to just go for the FX3 since I had gotten tired of my fuji xh2s, the FX3 is an absolutely amazing camera, the 12.800 native iso is a game changer, the only thing I don't like that it doesn't have internal ND's and that it doesn't have open gate or a viewfinder, but other than that I couldn't ask for a better video camera

@@GunnarBjarki-nw2oihow you like the image quality compared to the xh2s? Do you think it’s better or equal quality?

@@adnan_velic mmmm, it's hard to say excactly, I would say Equal in some ways, better in other ways, So for the fuji I had the 18-35mm 1.8, wich is equal to 26-52mm 2.8 or something like that on a fullframe, so a 24-70mm 2.8. beats that lens massively (inmyopinion) What I like about the sony that I didn't like about the fuji 1. It has reliable, I mean really reliable autofocus, and I can trust it, and I can map a button on the camera and on the lens to overwrite the autofocus if I need to focus manually, which is a game changer for my workflow 2. base iso is 800 and not 1250. I like 800 more because of nd filter stuff, I have a 2-5 stop wich is not enough, so I just bought a 6-9 stop 3. the ibis is better and smoother, with the fuji I was having some wobbles on the wide end, on sony I'm having way less, and I feel like the ibis is just a little bit better, not a lot but a little, + catalys browse can clean it up nicely if needed 4. being able quickly put on and take of the top handle without putting the camera in a cage is something that I love, because I can rig it up heavy and tear it appart super quickly without having tools to take of a cage etc. 5. the low light is just unbeatable 6. having a fullframe sensor if I need super shallow dof is super nice, I love a 35mm 1.4 look 7. xlr audio, I have a sennheiser mke 600 and it's absolutely amazing 8. I feel like the sony works better with my external monitor for some reason, I have an easier time autofocusing, and the same goes to the screen, I can see better where my focus is at 9. I can adjust settings like White balance, Stabilisation etc while recording, couldn't on fuji, I couldn't even change focus modes on fuji while recording which I hated 10. it's super reliable so far, I loved my fuji xh2s but it had reliability issues, I encountered some freezing and stuff and the camera not writing to the cards during some wedding photography which was an awful experience, 11. the lenses, at least the lenses that I have on my sony focus way closer than the ones I had on the fuji, the new sigma 24-70mm 2.8 II focuses super closely, wich I personally love, the fuji lenses I mainly used were 18-35 1.8 sigma, 35mm 1.4 (new) fuji, and 56mm 1.2 (new) fuji with the fuji prime lenses i found the manual focusing to be not as smooth as I would like 12. I feel like Slog is a little bit cleaner and flexible than Flog2, (I might be wrong on this one) but in my experience that's what I feel 13. when putting the camera on a gimbal and relying on autofocus, I can put different autofocus settings to choose how quickly the camera switches autofocus, or I can use touch tracking on the screen and the camera tracks the subject

1. Sony has more reliable autofocus, and I can map a button on the camera to toggle between autofocus and manual focus, I can’t do that on the fuji, when it’s recording on fuji you can’t change anything. 2. the 18-35mm 1.8 I used mostly on fuji is like a 26 or 28 - 52.5mm 2.8 so a 24-70mm 2.8 beats that lens every day, 3. full frame, so when I need that shallow dof, that 35mm 1.4 look, I can get it. 4. base iso 800 instead of 1250, I like it, I feel like it’s hard enough to get nd filtering for 800 in bright daylight, so I like it more than 1250 5. low light, nothing can beat 12.800 as a base iso, it’s insane 6. the xlr handle, I can mount a monitor and a sennheizer mke 600 on it without a cage, and if I need to lighten the camera quickly I just unscrew the top handle with my hands, no tools needed, no cage needed 7. I can change my white balance and a few other settings while recording, I couldn’t do that on fuji 8. I might be wrong, but I feel like the sony slog3 image is cleaner 9. from my experience I feel like the sony works better with my external monitor, and I feel like it’s easier to nail focus on it for some reason, not sure why, but I feel that way on the built in screen as well, I can see easier what’s in focus 10. the lenses for sony focus closer than the lenses that I had on fuji,
I had 18-35mm 1.8 I also had 2 native fuji lenses, new ones, 35mm 1.4 and 56mm 1.2, the sigma lenses for sony focus closer 11. fx3 has a fan 12. I had some reliability issues with my fuji, it sometimes froze in the middle of a wedding, I had issues where it didn’t save photos to my cards, Ive had photography issues where i’m shooting the first kiss on the wedding, camera tells me i’m nailing focus, but it’s focusing on the jesus statue in the background, awful experience 13. there is no zoom lens for fuji that compares to a 24-70mm 2.8 on a fullframe camera 14. I can change white balance when recording and stabilisation settings on my sony 15. sony ibis has less wobbly effect in my oppinion, when I shot wide on 18-35mm it had too much wobbles, I also shot on a 13mm viltrox wich was awful in terms of wobbles

@@Will_Speed thank you! I appreciate that! Still lots to see with birds man🤙🏻

@@ysdnsingh nothing actually. This is a solid state drive not a mechanical spinning disk.

@@chadwickerman Fusion doesn’t work for you? What about affinity or topaz instead of photoshop?

@@Alpha-qh5ys I had an issue today where the camera was just pulsing back and forth on a sign… I think the autofocus is mostly contrast based and not phase detect like most modern cameras. I do see the camera performing a little better when the scene is high contrast but that’s not always the case when you’re shooting for a client sometimes you don’t know what to expect. I cannot believe Fuji will probably spend another 3 months and NOT fix this issue again!

@@adnan_velic yes it's clearly contrast based because when I try to focus on a uniform surface it always fail I need to point at a corner or something which is contrasted

@@devicenotfound thank you!

@@Catpersiancat I made a video about 7.0 as well. It’s only a little better.

@@adnan_velic Thanks for the answer. I'm a new subscriber who just discovered you through this video.

@@jongrall how do you like capture one? I played around with it on iPad and found it pretty nice.

@@adnan_velic I much prefer Capture One to Lightroom. I’ve used both extensively and find that Capture One has better control over color, a better raw processing engine (especially for X-trans), wayyyy better tethering, more flexible organizational tools, and is just the industry standard on set (especially if you hire a digitech to help on shoot day). I found Lightroom is better for flexible presets and processing timelapses (thanks to LR Timelapse) neither of which I need. Capture One tethered into an iPad Pro via high-speed USB-C is my new on location tether setup.

@@bigrobotnewstoday1436 paying the monthly fee wasn’t an issue for me it was when I tried to cancel what they did that I didn’t like