Відео

@@darrellseike3185 the 385 series is my most favorite Ford engine. Thank you for your kind words!

It really helps with the exhaust side of the 429/460. Especially if you are running headers or the truck manifolds. The car manifolds are horrible.

@@davestewart9146 that’s why I had to cut the recording right there and walk away lol

@@MaxDeet7439 yeah those single wheel engine stands are dangerous. They shouldn’t even be allowed to sell them. Thank you for your kind words!

@@ThomasKinkead well there will be two 460 builds. This one will be for towing and going into my 1979 F-350. The other one will be a little more high performance and will be going into my 1978 F-150 4x4.

@@theregoesmiller389 if I was going to turn one 7,000-7,500 regularly I would invest in aftermarket rods. But unless you invest in aluminum heads and stuff you won’t like an iron headed 429/460 for a canyon carver car. They are too heavy and the car won’t handle good in corners. Now if you was going in a straight line like drag racing that’s a different story. But I have several 460 engines and a 1989 Mustang GT. Am I putting a 460 in it? Nope…a 351 Windsor is going in the car.

@@MattsRageFitGarage yeah I normally don’t get that lucky with engines from the junkyard lol

@@Bikerbob59 yes it was!

Are you just leaving it stock or are you going to do some improvements to it?

@@LuisAcosta-ro9xf Thank You for your kind words!

@@TheHord you are welcome!

@@TheHord you’re welcome! Thank you for watching!

@@sumdumhick mine has no problems running a 3” or 3 1/2” pulley on the motor.

@@paintnamer6403 when I worked at Oreillys I can remember pulling rebuilt water pumps out of the box and the bearings did not feel good in them. There’s no way they could have lasted too long. Ford didn’t have much in the way of high performance water pumps except for like the Boss 302 pump and a few others. Their heavy duty and industrial engine water pumps were usually way different than the passenger car stuff and wouldn’t interchange.

@@Jorde-v4w if I tried something like that it would blow out on me before I got out of the driveway 😂

@@darrellseike3185 do like I do and shop for parts that are on clearance or close out. That’s the only way I can afford to do it with no sponsors or anything.

I haven't heard anything about it's reliability either. I know the Triton V10 replaced the 460 and it was not a good replacement. Everyone I know that got one of the V10's told me the 460 would pull more but fuel mileage was about the same between them.

Yeah I guess I'm busted lol. I love my pups!

Thank You for your kind words! It means a lot!

The old DEH cams worked good. They were quiet and made good power. That's why it surprised me when Comp discontinued them.

@BlackLabGarage Yeah power and mpg is the same as the xe250h and it has better idle manners in the cold weather as well. I wish I had picked it back in 2013 now that I've run it.

@@tom87112 well the problem with that was I used some ROL head gaskets that I had. They measured around .040 best I can remember. But ROL is long out of business. If I was to get a commonly available head gasket it would be a Victor Reinz HG10034 and they measure right at .040” thick. Actually I have a set of the Victors stashed back for the next FE I build. The standard Fel Pro Permatorque gasket would be my dead last pick for a head gasket.

And has 1973 heads awesome lol are on my 1971 block

@@alfredocalzada5383 the D1VE block number was used thru the 1978 model year. The D3 head casting number was used into the 1980’s.

@@moparnut6286 it held up just fine on that 390. Only places it discolored was on the exhaust flange and on the intake crossover where the exhaust runs thru it. I’ve been so impressed by it that I will probably start using it on all my engines

@@sam-oh5wj it’s on my about me

@@sam-oh5wj it wouldn’t matter if I set one side flush and measured the other side or split the difference and set it with both sides protruding and measured both. Either way the seal would be too long and not have enough crush on the crankshaft.

Where did 60 come from.? If you had 30 knock off 15 and all good no.?

@@sam-oh5wj you have two halves of the seal. .030 x 2 is .060

@@grandcrappy I agree it does but sometimes the cost of swapping the engine, transmission, modifying the cab and linkages, and everything else makes it not worth it and not budget friendly to me. I don’t know many newer engines that could end up getting 300hp and 13mpg in a 1974 F-350 flatbed dually loaded! Besides these newer engines don’t have that musical sound of the older engines!

Yeah but they're generally pretty boring, or at least to me. Prefer the time machine.

@@MattsRageFitGarage I don’t know how long the anodizing looked good for? By the time I was old enough to remember the trucks, the anodizing had already dulled on them lol

@@BlackLabGarage Seems like about 10 years of being outside was enough to ruin it.

@ that would be about right. That would make me 10 years old at the time so it would be a few more years before I started paying attention to the details

@@johnkennedy5361 I have not tried it over rust.

@@Bbbbad724 I’m ok. Just been really busy

@@bryanrodriguez6759 honestly I couldn’t say for sure since that balancer is old and more than likely has slippage. Since the 400 will be coming out eventually I just set the timing where the engine runs the best and I let the initial be whatever it is. But I wouldn’t be surprised at all if it wasn’t 18-20 degrees of initial or possibly more

@@captjim007 Thank you for your kind words. Some people didn’t catch that I said this is for a truck motor. I would do it completely different for a drag race engine.

@@thaddeusrex1 Thank you for your kind words! I’m glad you found it helpful.

I'll have to remember that. I have bought from DB Electrical before to get parts to fix starters but I haven't ever bought a new starter from them. I'll have to try them out.

I guarantee it was leaking badly if they didn't trim the intake gaskets down! Where is your intake leaking? At the China walls?

@@BlackLabGarage Yes but only the back one, I'm probably going to re-do the manifold during the winter. Not an expensive deal, but just a lot of mechanical wrench turning.

@ do you have a pcv system on it and hooked up? My 400 in my 1979 F-350 pushed oil out the China walls and I discovered they had unhooked the pcv system. I hooked it back up and it quit leaking at the China walls

@@BlackLabGarage PVC on the passenger side, and the tube from the oil filler to the air cleaner on the other side. I will check the hoses and connections today.

@ I have seen the passage on the carburetor spacer stop up before not allowing the pcv to have vacuum

I have had the ground cables be bad and cause slow starting also. They will look fine on the outside but I guess the are corroded inside under the insulation. I have used the negative side of a set of jumper cables ran from the negative on the battery to a good ground on the engine to see if it makes a difference when cranking. If it does then I replace the ground cable.

@@Bbbbad724 The FE engines are definitely the most versatile engine Ford ever built. From powering dump trucks to AC Cobras and Cobra Jet Mustangs they FE engines did it all. I like the engines but I still prefer the 429/460 engines over them. That’s only because the 429/460 is easier to make more power out of for less money just because they were a newer designed engine. The FE engines are a close second to me. One thing I will say about the FE engines. No other engine sounds like them. They are a unique designed engine with a unique sound all of their own.

@ My favorite was the 410 Mercury Parklane. It was 10.5:1 and with C6AER heads with CJ valves and just a.020 overbore you could get 413 ci of CJ power. I put the Comp282S or the Ford “D” solid with the thin steel gaskets and a 2x4v PI like the Shelby got in 67 with headers. 11.3:1 cr and SPS hardware back then and man I put it in a 67 Fastback Mustang. I drove it every day to school with 24” 3 inch header mufflers hollowed out. That car put a can of whoopass on every one who wanted to run me. I never lost. It was crazy and could hold 6200 for the 32,‘miles from Springfield to Bolivar on old 13 before they did the new one. It was so much fun and you are right a solid lifter FE, nothing sounds like that! I m blind and can’t drive any more. I have a 510 hp 394 ci 390 in a 65 Galaxie set up like a miler for Grand National. Man that was fun to drive. I miss driving!

@ I have never been around a 410 unfortunately. There just wasn’t many of them around here apparently

@@davestewart9146 You’re welcome! Thank you for your kind words and continued support for my channel. It’s appreciated more than you could ever know

@@Bikerbob59 if you have a small block Ford or 335 or 385 series Ford, no doubt the factory gear drive starters are the way to go. Less weight, more cranking power, and they draw less current from the battery when cranking. It’s a win win all the way around

@@dadgarage7966 I think they make kits now that will let you go even bigger than that. I remember when you couldn’t get a stroker kit from Eagle or Scat. The first stroker 460 I ever saw used 440 Chrysler rods, offset ground crank, and I’m not sure what the pistons were out of.

@@BradyWeatherford dollar for dollar it’s one of the best upgrades you can do. Plus the gear drive starters do not draw as much current when cranking either.

@@MattsRageFitGarage I’ve never checked the bolt pattern between an FE and SBF starter. It may be they are the same

@@BlackLabGarage They are the same, just the SBF lacks the third bolt ear. Apparently the engagement is the same as well, 3/4" throw or whatever it is. The starter I have on there now cross references to my truck as well. I bet a PMGR SBF starter would work with it.

@ does the bendix itself appear to be the same?

@@BlackLabGarage Sure looks like it. Both are 9 tooth bendix gears with 3/4" throw. The location in relation to the center of the starter looks the same as well although the PMGR starters are offset from center-line a bit because they're 10? tooth gears. I looked up the bendix for a 1989 F150 with a 351 automatic and its the same Standard SDN-77 starter drive as for a 1968 Ford galaxie with a 390 automatic. I'm going to say a 302/351 PMGR starter will very likely work with a FE/auto trans with 184 tooth ring gear.

@@Bbbbad724 it sounded real good thru the two chamber mufflers.

@@JrSamples-g4v if you’re talking about using a jumper wire on the starter mounted solenoid, Ford specifically recommends to not do this. It will work but it can also cause the starter to run on for about two seconds after the engine is running. I tried it myself years ago and it happened to me as well when I tried it.

@@BlackLabGarage I can confirm the starter will run on, which is why I won't do it that way even though it's a little easier to install.

@ some people seem to not have that problem but I know I did when I tried it and Ford and others warn to not hook them up that way because it will cause run on. Why some guys don’t have that problem I’m not sure?