I bought the X100V last year as an iPhone photography upgrade. Agree with you about the learning curve … it’s a journey but this camera is so enjoyable and rewarding. I started taking B&W film photos as a kid back in the 60’s, developing and printing as a teen in the 70’s and now it seems I’ve gone full circle all these years later by shooting monochrome with my new Fuji. It’s great! 📷🙂
@@SamHolland For now I’m going for the mostly clean digital look although I have tried several grainy recipes … maybe later after some years of experience with the Fuji my tastes will veer towards a filmic look. I think this is because I was frustrated with the noise on my iPhone images.
Wow, such an honest and sobering review of this camera. You hit the hammer on the nail when emphasizing the need to develop one’s photography knowledge and experience.
The premise here seems to be that the goal of the X100-V is to make film-like photos. That may be a part of the Fuji-X line in general but there are way more things that are important about the X100 series. It's compact with good sensor and lens so you can carry with you always. The Fuji controls let you control ever aspect of the exposure triangle easily or shoot in totally auto mode. The camera just looks and feels good. All that said- a fixed focal length camera is limiting by nature. That limit of a 35mm equivalent lens forces you to think a bit more about what you are doing.
Purchased the X100F in 2018, loved it. Yet hated the fact that I couldn't change the lens and that the OVF wasn't really comfortable for my dominant left eye. Yet was so blown away by the colors the Fujifilm sensor produces and the JPG-only shooting, so I sold all my Nikon gear AND the X100V and purchased the X-T3, got a the 27mm WR pancake lens mounted on there and will never look back at the X100-series. I wish people (Tiktokkers, hipsters, 'influencers') would be more honest and highlight the range of Fuji camera's as a whole: they ALL have these film simulations, and almost all of them have the retro look when you buy the silver version. Buying a second hand X-T3/4/5, X-Pro2/3, X-E20 or X-T20/30 + the 27mm pancake lens you get the same image quality, the same creative freedom but keep the option of changing lenses in the future.
Too much choice of lenses paralyzes any newbie. The best thing you can do is force yourself into a single focal length for at least a year. See the world in 35mm. You’ll emerge a far better photographer. You can always expand from there. When it comes to photography, “less options” is the mother of creativity.
@@MikeLikesChannel I agree and I meant exactly the same thing: don't focus (hehe) too much on 1 single device: look at similar camera's that provide the option to expand, but stick with a prime lens. Either a 27mm or the 35mm: best picks!
My first cam is the xt 20 in 2018 and the first lens I bought was the 23 f2.0 and I was always wondering Why everyone buys a camera for double the price with less abilities but I think it's bc no one is able to search stuff on their own. They need a tik tok to understand 😂
There quite a few things that I noticed. You didn’t mentioned the leaf shutter. This is probably one of the most important aspects of these cameras. The leaf shutter on this camera means it’s virtually quiet, and you can get creative with the flash. Another major aspect of this camera, to have a more close to analog experience is the optical viewfinder. That with the screen turned off and you will be more focused on shooting and not so much in reviewing the photographs all the time. Receipts are a major thing on Fujifilm cameras. All of them. Not only the x100 series. I have a xt4, x-h2 and a x-m1. All of them have receipts I adapted for my taste. I do agree with you about getting started with a cheaper camera for beginners before going after the latest and greatest. A XE1 to XE3 are fantastic choices. Also the xpro 1 and 2. You can get the 1 really cheap. And the x-t1, x-m1 are even cheaper. Finally fintou get a x/trans 1 sensor, with 16mp, you will get probably better colors and more filmic look and feel. The x-m1, x-t1 and x-pro 1 are very well known for that. As a final note I strongly recommend also the x100s.
It's the opposite of a beginner camera in fact. It exactly replicates those 35mm "Dad's cameras" of the 1960s and 70s, the Voigtlanders and Halinas, with their brown plastic cases. That's why I bought mine (amazingly at retail price in 2022). You need to know what the camera can do, and you need to know what you want it to do. It's a complex tool actually. It can do a lot. I'm sure I'll be tweaking recipes for 10 years but mostly I use my tweaked versions of Classic Neg, Kodak 400, and Acros, depending on the light. What I enjoy the most though is an Acros recipe, 1/250thsec, manual focus around 5 metres, added grain, and the glass viewfinder. I let Auto iso ride as high as it likes. It puts you in the moment, especially if you turn off the rear LCD, and only review your images back at home. That's as close to shooting 35mm film as I ever want to be again. No other camera makes me want to experiment as much.
Best x100 video I have seen so far. Love it! I have owned the s, t and f models and sold them all. I think you nailed it, when you said it was depressing getting home, and none of your images looked anywhere near what you had seen online before buying the camera. I recently bought the s model again. Cheap. And I love it. Because I now know what I am getting into. The simplicty of the camera makes you focus on whats important; taking photos. Too many options is just too stressful. I do consider getting the f for its spot metering and half press shutter, none of which the s has. And when I look at my old photos, the f’s higher resolution and newer sensor really is worth the upgrade.
I have a Sony a7iv, xt5 and x100v . I’ve owned a lot of camera through multiple systems . I’ve bought the x100v 3 times lol my girlfriend calls it toxic ex I can’t get over . It’s definitely over hyped but I really do love the camera and enjoy shooting it over anything I’ve ever owned . Yes it could be better but so can a Leica . I enjoy the experience.
You are correct about setting expectations. I reckon there are many disappointed users expecting instant results due to influencers. Your final comment is absolutely spot-on. I have no idea why people rave about Fuji *when they are only shooting RAW* and post-processing. I shoot straight out of camera JPEG with RAW only as a backup so I can later change the recipe in Fuji X RAW Studio. Coming from a DSLR it was a so refreshing not having to sit for hours post-processing RAW images on my PC. For a "better" film look, also reduce the clarity (the camera takes a couple of seconds to process the image) and add a pro-mist filter to suite your taste. On my X-E4 I shoot greater than 640 ISO to get the grain/noise and take advantage of DR400 which only works at or above 640 ISO. Don't be afraid of ISO noise, use it, especially for B&W images. When using a recipe based on Acros I shoot at least 1,600+ if possible. The higher the ISO, the greater the "grain" on Acros. I could not get on with the fixed 23mm so went from X100T to X-E3 then X-E4. I wish I started with my Fuji 35mm f2 rather than the 27mm f2.8 as 35mm on APS-C is more my style, the 35mm f2 is very quick and sharp. I got the cheaper plastic version without aperture ring, they are optically the same. The 27mm is useful for compactness. I love my Fuji for jpeg, but if you are just going to shoot RAW, then get a different brand and post-process the hell out of the image to your hearts content, you are wasting your money on a Fuji and the auto-focus is superior on other brands.
A lot of people who are buying the x100v are already fuji shooters and we know what these cameras can do. The reason they buy this camera is for its simplicity, same reason why you would get a Q2. If you aren't a fuji shooter, I would recommend to first get something like X-T30ii which is way cheaper as its a more versatile then x100v while having the same (or similar) sensor, and is still quite small, especially if you combine it with one of the fuji's F2 lenses or a pancake lens. I want to get x100v because I want a camera where i don't need to have the choice of which lens I will be using as well as being as small as possible. I will be having this camera as my daily family camera, as well as taking some BTS photos while I am filming videos for clients or weddings.
One underrated aspect of the x100 series is how good they are as a family documentarian camera. I'm glad I have my iphone to take pictures of things I wouldn't otherwise get, but scrolling through my photos on my computer, I'm consistently impressed by much better my x100t photos look in comparison with the ones of the iphones that I've had along side it. Proneg Std (Noise Reduction -1, Highlights -1, Shadows +1) is just so good and is pure nostalgia. I honestly think it is a great beginner camera though. Everything you need to adjust is on the outside of it. You don't have lens choices. It can be a little punishing if you don't plan your shots, but on full auto using Provia or Velvia, you'll get enough cool looking pictures to hook you.
The simplicity and lock-in into one 35mm f/2 prime lens breeds understanding. A beginner will learn what f/2 vs f/8 means, what 1/250th vs 1/10th means, what ISO160 vs 800 means on a bright sunny day. There’s no better camera to learn the exposure triangle with.
good points! Most of the photos can be taken with a smartphone. And dont buy it for recipies, you custom make your own anyways. If you dont shoot people alot and mostly buildings, go for x100t, x100f or ricoh gr3. I used to shoot with canon 5dmk2, and its not as close to sony a7r4 on technical stuff but it made you think different. We have become lazy and expect the camera to do the job for us. I do love mine x100VI and alot of stuff to learn
Thanks for your honest opinion, and for not over-hyping the x100v with the craze that it went to on social media, that basically doubled its real price, up to about $2k used. I just bought a Sony RX1R mk II, because for the same $2k you get something that is even rarer and way superior in IQ, to the x100v.
Sam i think one of the points you make near the begining about get a film camera if you want film is correct.The Fuji camera is very good , but i think its a photographers camera , and its brilliant for street , portraits etc . Its not a DSLR , it takes working and the dials etc make it like USING a film camera not film images .Thats the pleasure of using the Fuji .It will make you a much better photographer as you say if you stick with it .Its immensely satisfying as a photographer and the emulations are very very good, closer to film than some , but it is a digital camera not a film camera.I have used a lot of them and Canon top end DSLR cameras .The Fuji makes me smile and really enjoy photography. I never had the love of it the same when i was using DSLR cameras , as good as they are they have no mojo or real excitement they were just tools. I am 62 and started on film cameras , then DSLRs doing pro photography then sold the lot and got into the Fuji stuff and took the best pics i ever took in my life .
So to summarize, if you dont know how to USE the camera and arent willing to invest the time to LEARN how to USE the camera stick to an iphone and some insta filters.... The camera doesnt create the image, the photographer creates the image... This camera is a great photographic tool in the right hands. The learning curve isnt difficult but does require the time required to gain experience.
If you wants to improve your photography I actually recommend going full film for a few months. As long as you understand the basics of composition, exposure, focal lengths. When I first got into photography, using a film camera for a few months really forced me to consider all my shots, which made me think about my composition and exposure A LOT. When I do digital, I chimp a lot, and I don’t think that’s good habit. Not saying that digital is bad, but by forcing you to go full manual down to the film development, it really slows down your thought process and thinki through more of your shots, which really builds some artistic and technical character.
I had the first one and sold it, regretted it and went and bought the x100s and love it these two have a great look as you go they get more digital. As you say too clean and nice, i think youd love the first two, if you get a chance to use one of them i think you'll like either one.
You’re well on your way brother! Definitely got a good understanding of what you need to do to progress, and basically nailed everything on head! Keep it up.
Thank you for this video. People don’t understand the camera won’t make them a good photographer, you need to work on it. I feel the 100V is a specialty camera, and people how want it know what they are doing.
I got the camera the other day, and I agree with your review 100% It’s a great camera, but it really boils down to your skill as a photographer and editor 📸
Appreciate your frankness. I had one of the earlier x100s. And bought the X100v before all its hype came along. I opted to return it. They make too many concessions to form over function. For example, the limited size tabs on the aperture ring (hard to reach), and the need to add a thumb rest for a more secure grip on it. And i agree with you that the film presets are just ok, not more. Its not a bad camera, just over priced for what it is.
Fun fact - For the average person/shooter, film photography is about imperfections. Buying a super expensive, high megapixel, fixed focal length camera, auto everything with digital film simulations isn't going to replicate film. You have a better chance if you go backwards, not forwards. I have a Leica M8, the first digital M model from 2006, with a Kodak CCD sensor, it's fully manual and 10MP. The grain is there in the shadows or everywhere with the ISO at 640 and above, and the colours are on point (People say it's like shooting a neverending roll of Kodachrome, and tbh, they aren't wrong). It feels the exact same as shooting with my Leica M6. Sometimes I see a dead pixel line on some of the last images if I've shot a lot of photos that day, but for IG, nobody can see that; and again, imperfections. The dead pixel lines resemble the scratches you can sometimes get on film negatives. The only downside to the M8 is that it's terrible above 640 ISO, even at 640 it's a bit shit. I've been looking at getting a 100F or 100V, mostly due to the hype surrounding it/them on the internet which you mentioned. I love 35mm focal lengths, street photography and film, it's all I shoot, so you can see my interest. I've seen a 100F for dirt cheap, and if they reply to me, then I might take it, purely for travel and some auto stuff for speed, convenience and for low light. But, we'll see, I kinda like my M8. But yeah - if it's film you want to replicate, which is what this video seems to mostly be about, get a Leica M8 or something with a decent CCD sensor. I got lucky and got mine for £800 on Facebook marketplace in July this year.
I wish most UA-camrs, especially Fujifilm centered ones, emphasized the fact that the thought behind and process of taking a photo is far more important than the camera itself which is what you're saying here. Unfortunately that doesn't get clicks or revenues, which a lot of other gear-averse channels say. Thanks for doing good for the community!
Great video. Nice to hear you balance out some of the hype on this camera and speak the honest truth about results. It won’t magically make amazing photos - like all great images, it’s a combination of light, composition, lens rendering, and editing. The series of photos from the bar are great. The fun you had shooting this is shown in the results. Nice stuff. 👍🏼
I just bought a preowned one last night on eBay. I got the all-black version. I cannot wait for it to arrive. I already have a camera, but I wanted something that I could carry around on my way to work or when I go on walks with my dog. I have my Sony A7IV for the more serious work.
You got the Fuji! I still think my favorite photos with it are shot RAW and then I color them more like film 🤷♂️ the simulations are nice for quick shots, street photography. But I love my RAWs more. The softness of the colors and tones still comes through and that’s what I love about the Fuji look.
Love the fact you're into fujifilm as well!! I use to shoot on a Canon and then started doing video with Lumix and a GH5 and G9 combo but switched to Fuji with an X-T3 and X-T4 combo 2 years ago. My X-T3 is still my bread and butter, run and gun video rig. I've put miles on that camera with corporate projects over the last few years!! My X-T4 is my favourite camera though, I've put in my own recipes and presets for photos. Just slap a 23mm F1.4 prime on the front and its a fantastic walk around/street combo. The X-T4 goes everywhere with me.
Have had mine for a year. Equipped it with K&F Concept magnetic UV which completes the weather sealing and supports the K&F magnetic CPL which nests in a cheap plastic lens cap on a lanyard of fly fishing line. Now I have what I want: a digital version of my ancient Leica III-f shooting in RAW on a fine sensor with full manual control of exposure and access to focus mag, peaking, shutter delay, ND filter without menu diving. I'm happy to give up the look and limitation of all film but prefer the tactile ergonomics of my relic Leica over the confusing and limiting automatic programs of many modern cameras, and that is where my fun factor is. This is a camera which can always be with me, walking, hiking, bicycling. I never use the film simulations and always shoot all cameras (other than my iPhone) in RAW. The lens is not a sharp as are my best FF lenses from Sony, Zeiss and Voigtlander, particularly when at MFD, but Topaz Sharpening and LrC texture recover that look, and I could never do that with film! Paid $450 over MSRP for an open box used x100v and no regrets.
I started in the 90s with a Canon AE1 and films inside (old school)- now I own a Sony A7III since it came out and I have some decent lenses and I'm happy with it. I had a Fujifil X-T5 for one day to be lighter, smaller and more with the film simulations for streetphotography. And after I tried it I decided to stick with my old A7III. :-D
Funny fact, the guy I bought my X-S10 from upgraded to the X100V, he later messaged me he regretted the decision and sent it back and bought another X-S10 - it’s basically an X100V with IBIS and interchangeable lenses and you can get a pancake lens to get nearly identical portability.
@@scotttucker9613 What unique features is it missing exactly? - it has many dials, you can set them to do what you want, like ISO, shutter, even aperture if you use a lens without an aperture ring.
Yes! This is the truth. I had this exact experience. You can also do a number on yourself by getting a new expensive full frame or a 3000$ lens. Great video.
I don't fully get it. You make it sound like the cam is not that good. But OF COURSE it comes down to skill. With every camera. I do photography for 20+ years now and just recently got the x100v. And It gets me so hyped to go out and shoot. Film recipes are dope. Low light capabilities are sick and image quality is awesome. So please don't make it sound like the x100v is bad in any way 😄
It’s a 3 year old camera. I like my X-S20 for the larger grip, better battery, better autofocus, flip out screen & video abilities. It’s rather small with the 27mm pancake. You can try different recipes to get the look you want with any of their cameras. No way would I pay more than retail for that camera when you can buy a used X-T30 and get a similar experience. I do think film simulations make taking pictures more fun. Great travel cameras
Wow. This is the first no-nonsense test of this phone I've seen and the first time someone even mentions the bokeh performance! It could as well be an ad for this phone. I'm looking for a replacement for my pixel and I'm curious about Sony, but you can't really learn much about them. And even when some tech reviewer decides to test one of their phones, it's usually 'the auto camera mode could be better' without getting into any details. This is exactly what I was looking for.
The X100f I used for travel, family, and street photos had an accident in February and no longer functions. So I bought a Pixel 8 Pro cellphone thinking it could be an adequate replacement, instead of getting an X100VI. Surprisingly, images from the Pixel 8 Pro that I can compare to images taken with the X100f are comparable and often better. Now will it so the same job in all circumstances that the X100VI can handle with its leaf shutter and built-in ND filter? Not likely, but to be determined in the future.
As I'm hearing your objectives about this camera, try Olympus EM5 mark iii. If you're up to retro design, the silver/black version is just gorgeous. You have tones of little inexpenses lenses to choose from - you can be more creative and experimenting with different looks. You can of course shoot RAW and/or JPG and download pics directly to your phone via build in wifi. You can tweek the curve for highlights and shadows and you can shoot directly with the BW filter on. 21mpx is enough if you want to shoot JPEG and image stabilization is just great. Hit the second hand markets for a great deal, this fuji is a bit of a hype racing the price higher.
I've been shooting with the Sony A7 series for about 10 years and Conon before that & some film cameras along the way. I bought an X100f a few months ago mainly for the experience of using it plus the small/light form factor. I use it with OVF only & no image review and for general [non important] photos it is a joy to use. Yes, the A7Riii and 35GM produces much "better" images, but the X100f is still regularly used.
@@FaridBoulmeck SENSOR...it's old with it's limitations back in the day, by the time we got to the X100T it was clinical and waxy looking. The newer cameras just can't replicate the film look out of the camera (need to post edit) they are too clean like a phone ...lol. I have all 3 and use the X-E1 and X100 mostly due to size, but when I feel like showing off the X-Pro1 is the nicest to use as it's bigger & feels like a tool not a toy. Choice is yours, probably go in to a camera store and play around with the X-Pro3/ X100 and X-E4.... they are almost identical in size from the old models and google images from these cameras (also consider X100S for film look)
Good points Sam, I love the fuji cameras and with fuji weekly recipes (thanks Reggie) I have loved the new "filmic" looks I have achieved and become a better photographer because of it. I say win win.
Great video. What the hype starters don't tell you, because they've got all the gear and no idea, is that part of the reason your film camera is so different to the X100 series, or any digital, is the lens. Film and digital will never look the same, but an interchangeable lens camera with a vintage lens and the right film recipe will get you mostly there..... but a fixed modern lens will never hit the right spot without RAW manipulation. Save your money, buy something like an X-T1, a good adapter and a Helios 44-2 or a Zuiko Auto-w.
Very good video, I had the x100t for a few months, and then I had to sell it for financial reasons. I'm saving up for the x100v now and I think it will be worth it, and there are things I think I'll really appreciate after having the T. I don't know what the x100v's screen is like, but with the x100t I preferred to use the electronic viewfinder, since it was much more representative of the final image.
Looove the honest review Sam. You are one of my fav channels right now. I have the x100v but I find I can get similar images when I shoot with my sony zv1. Just dont take it out with me as much as I want to. Professionally I am a panasonic shooter, I want something for everyday use too. Keep it up man. Big thumbs up from me.
I’m just gonna stick with my Nikon Z8 and either edit the photos myself or use one of there built in picture controls. This camera doesn’t sound like it’s got me.. the size was the main selling point
For me, putting an old vintage lens on my Fuji XT4 with the film simulation presets makes the picture look “old” right the way. I dont think this x100v is worth the value
I have had this camera now for some time; hold onto it and continue to use it. It’s more versatile than you know based on this video. That being said It’s not my go to camera since i got the Ricoh gr3 ( not recommended for the look and ease that your after). For the more retro / film look consider an m10/m240 and a low contrast lens.
I would get one, but without thinking about simulating a film camera. I guess I would be satisfied. On the other hand, more affordable Fuji models with a couple small primes would be a better deal.
my all time favorite film like-digital camera was the X-30 that I gifted over 8 years ago and longed for another ever since however the used price is higher than it was new. It had tons of film simulations including Acros and Clasic Chrome. and lots of quirky/fun art filters, I only shot in JPEG and wasted no time in photoshop. The reason I gave it away is because the girl I gave it to was in a 3rd world country and couldnt afford any camera. So me with first world problems to worry about at that time, like having the highest megapixels possible and a full frame sensor and the X30 was quickly loosing the race with a 1/1.7 inch sensor and a lowly 12 megapixels. Wow I had the perfect film like camera and didnt even realize it. Live and Learn. So now I am about to get the X100VI or spend half as much on a Canon R50 with kit lens as both have amazing autofocus. Now if Olympus would only come out with a new PEN-F... Oh Bother...
Nice video. Thank you for making it. I have a Fuji X100s and like it a lot. When I decided to upgrade to the X100v, it was too late. There are none to be had, not at list price. I agree with someone else's comment that the goal of the X100v seems to be all about film simulation and recipes. This is the latest hipster trend; I don't care about this. I also don't care about the flip screen. If that was not there I would like the camera even more. The X100 sensor and processor are the things that make this camera excel. According to other information, the X100v lens has some improvements over previous models. You did not even mention that. In my mind, the sensor, processor, and lens make this a fantastic camera. If I can ever find one for MSRP I will buy one. Thanks again.
If you don't know if photography is actually your thing and buying a new camera and definitely want Fuji, there's plenty of cheaper and more versatile versions you can get and every single one has these film simulations to play with. Don't fall for the looks of the camera. From Fuji I'd pick something like x-s10 or x-T30 II with some small zoom just to get hang of how different focal lengths work and it would still be way cheaper than X100V/VI
Get a cheap 49mm clear filter. Use black or silver spray paint and get a fine mist on the inside of the filter. This will soften the image a bit and create halation or glow. Now, your high-tech camera will look more like an old film camera with a old lens. Or just buy a pro mist or glimmer glass filter.
I like everything about it but the focus by wire is just bad. If you aren't into manual focusing quickly, it wont be a problem. Otherwise, get another (fuji) camera with a solid manual focusing lens. Sucks that you'll lose the cool viewfinder and the flash. But oh well. At least you can focus.
Thanks so much for the honest review Sam. You made a lot of great points. Yes so much hype on this camera and you have helped me decide to buy or not to buy. Thanks again
Hi Sam, thanks for your thoughts on the “V”. I have also just watched yours friends “V” opinion. It has become common to see options like yours and your friends about the “ film like” IQ, but you never say what film type you are comparing it to. I am not a film shooter so I am not experienced enough to be specific, but I think it’s unrealistic to compare an image taken in Astia(?) and compare it to an image shot on Kodachrome (?) I assume an experienced film shooter would load a specific film to suit the conditions of the day. And that if those conditions changed the results might not be real indications of what the film type is capable of. So those images might not be considered, relative to the specific film, film like. So short of carrying multiple cameras with multiple film types to make the best images the film type can produce you can’t guarantee the perfect “film” look. So as I said, you need to spacific if you are going to speculate on any given image. I think you would need to, to be far, bracket the film simulation, and then compare the results with images taken with the original film stock. This is an observation not criticism, I have owned the “F” and “V”.
Thanks for this amazing video! Really want this camera for the reasons you mention and mostly to have a good Jpeg shooter as I dont really like editing photos. That said you saved me some money being so honest. Will keep my M50 for now and use that more just to learn as Im still a newbie but then down the road if I keep taking photos I might switch to Fuji or something smilliar :D
Ohhhhh it's a hater that can't find one!!! Lmfao if yall ain't a dime a dozen. Just go prepay at b&h you'll have one and be taking pictures for the FUN OF IT AGAIN.
@@pjbiggleswerth8903 It's not being able to not find one. I just refuse to pay more than MSRP for even a used one and/or pay and wait who the hell knows how long to get a brand new one at the price it should be.
I've been shooting for over 30 years and I have the camera for you that gets that filmic look right out of camera for really good price. Is the Olympus e500 or the e300 it has a Kodak TCD sensor which is the same as they have in the Leica cameras done
Ya I don’t know anything about photography, but I still want to get this camera. Been thinking about getting a good camera for a while. I’m going to try to take some time to learn though
Get yourself the cheapest mirrorless you can of any brand before you commit to an expensive one. You can pick up some bargain early Sony mirrorless cameras.
Weird that the optical viewfinder is not mentioned. This is the one thing that this camera has that is unique to any other camera. Yes there is the Leica M_ but the Fuji hybrid optical viewfinder has digitral overlays so arguably could be described as more advanced.
Another great video, Sam! I really like that you put your honest opinion, not just simply following the trend. And the way how you speak and explain things is so somehow resonate with me )) It looks like if I explained something myself )) Also likes Panasonics cameras of course... and Sigma lenses by the way =))
I dont understand your complaint. If you want to buy into the hype so much that your expectations are not met, then you worry too much about other peoples opinions. Buy the camera, use the camera over time, then decide. The rest is fanciful clickbait
I don't think this camera is for me because it lacks the flexibility in lens selection with its fixed focal length which is essentially a 35mm for a full frame. I would have suggest people looking for this camera look at X-TX0 series type camera from Fuji. It can be a Fuji XT20, XT30, XT30ii. You can mixed and match different lenses like Fuji's own 23mm F1.4, 23mm F2 or Viltrox 23mm F1.4, or 35mm F2, XC-35mm F2 (which is very cheap) or 33mm Viltrox/Tokina or 30mm Sigma. There are just so many of these 23mm-50mm primes for the Fuji APSC cameras that are cheap and good. I am still using XT20 at the moment and I only shoot jpegs. Going for forward I might look at newer generation of XTX0, the reason I like the Xt20 type camera is their size and weight, all these cameras are just slightly over 350 grams and put a 23mm or 35mm APSC lens like the ones mentioned and they barely weighs in at around 500 grams, the resolution of the photos from these cameras are good enough for sharing with friends and they looks good with minimum editing.
I bought the X100V last year as an iPhone photography upgrade. Agree with you about the learning curve … it’s a journey but this camera is so enjoyable and rewarding. I started taking B&W film photos as a kid back in the 60’s, developing and printing as a teen in the 70’s and now it seems I’ve gone full circle all these years later by shooting monochrome with my new Fuji. It’s great! 📷🙂
It is loads of fun. And the black and white mode on this is 👌🏻 do you think it looks close enough to film, with your experience?
@@SamHolland For now I’m going for the mostly clean digital look although I have tried several grainy recipes … maybe later after some years of experience with the Fuji my tastes will veer towards a filmic look. I think this is because I was frustrated with the noise on my iPhone images.
@@SamHollandwhat do you prefer if your beginner photography but kinda want that film look but like you said this one a bit expensive
@@SamHollandtbh i feel like i can just learn and grow with this camera and gain experience
Wow, such an honest and sobering review of this camera. You hit the hammer on the nail when emphasizing the need to develop one’s photography knowledge and experience.
Thank you, Jerry 🙏🏻🎥📸
The premise here seems to be that the goal of the X100-V is to make film-like photos. That may be a part of the Fuji-X line in general but there are way more things that are important about the X100 series. It's compact with good sensor and lens so you can carry with you always. The Fuji controls let you control ever aspect of the exposure triangle easily or shoot in totally auto mode. The camera just looks and feels good. All that said- a fixed focal length camera is limiting by nature. That limit of a 35mm equivalent lens forces you to think a bit more about what you are doing.
The problem is that the social media hype train made it seem like this is some magical vintage photo machine.
Purchased the X100F in 2018, loved it. Yet hated the fact that I couldn't change the lens and that the OVF wasn't really comfortable for my dominant left eye.
Yet was so blown away by the colors the Fujifilm sensor produces and the JPG-only shooting, so I sold all my Nikon gear AND the X100V and purchased the X-T3, got a the 27mm WR pancake lens mounted on there and will never look back at the X100-series.
I wish people (Tiktokkers, hipsters, 'influencers') would be more honest and highlight the range of Fuji camera's as a whole: they ALL have these film simulations, and almost all of them have the retro look when you buy the silver version. Buying a second hand X-T3/4/5, X-Pro2/3, X-E20 or X-T20/30 + the 27mm pancake lens you get the same image quality, the same creative freedom but keep the option of changing lenses in the future.
Nah it's better that they don't know, don't want Fuji's entire lineup to get overinflated in price lol
Too much choice of lenses paralyzes any newbie. The best thing you can do is force yourself into a single focal length for at least a year. See the world in 35mm. You’ll emerge a far better photographer. You can always expand from there. When it comes to photography, “less options” is the mother of creativity.
@@MikeLikesChannel I agree and I meant exactly the same thing: don't focus (hehe) too much on 1 single device: look at similar camera's that provide the option to expand, but stick with a prime lens. Either a 27mm or the 35mm: best picks!
My first cam is the xt 20 in 2018 and the first lens I bought was the 23 f2.0 and I was always wondering Why everyone buys a camera for double the price with less abilities but I think it's bc no one is able to search stuff on their own. They need a tik tok to understand 😂
Cant blame them, people are sheeps. They follow what their sold
There quite a few things that I noticed. You didn’t mentioned the leaf shutter. This is probably one of the most important aspects of these cameras. The leaf shutter on this camera means it’s virtually quiet, and you can get creative with the flash.
Another major aspect of this camera, to have a more close to analog experience is the optical viewfinder. That with the screen turned off and you will be more focused on shooting and not so much in reviewing the photographs all the time.
Receipts are a major thing on Fujifilm cameras. All of them. Not only the x100 series. I have a xt4, x-h2 and a x-m1. All of them have receipts I adapted for my taste. I do agree with you about getting started with a cheaper camera for beginners before going after the latest and greatest. A XE1 to XE3 are fantastic choices. Also the xpro 1 and 2. You can get the 1 really cheap. And the x-t1, x-m1 are even cheaper.
Finally fintou get a x/trans 1 sensor, with 16mp, you will get probably better colors and more filmic look and feel. The x-m1, x-t1 and x-pro 1 are very well known for that.
As a final note I strongly recommend also the x100s.
Small correction. They have recipes not receipts.
It's the opposite of a beginner camera in fact. It exactly replicates those 35mm "Dad's cameras" of the 1960s and 70s, the Voigtlanders and Halinas, with their brown plastic cases.
That's why I bought mine (amazingly at retail price in 2022).
You need to know what the camera can do, and you need to know what you want it to do. It's a complex tool actually. It can do a lot.
I'm sure I'll be tweaking recipes for 10 years but mostly I use my tweaked versions of Classic Neg, Kodak 400, and Acros, depending on the light.
What I enjoy the most though is an Acros recipe, 1/250thsec, manual focus around 5 metres, added grain, and the glass viewfinder. I let Auto iso ride as high as it likes.
It puts you in the moment, especially if you turn off the rear LCD, and only review your images back at home. That's as close to shooting 35mm film as I ever want to be again.
No other camera makes me want to experiment as much.
Every x100v uses their camera set up differently. Just have to make it work for you.
Best x100 video I have seen so far. Love it!
I have owned the s, t and f models and sold them all. I think you nailed it, when you said it was depressing getting home, and none of your images looked anywhere near what you had seen online before buying the camera. I recently bought the s model again. Cheap. And I love it. Because I now know what I am getting into. The simplicty of the camera makes you focus on whats important; taking photos. Too many options is just too stressful. I do consider getting the f for its spot metering and half press shutter, none of which the s has. And when I look at my old photos, the f’s higher resolution and newer sensor really is worth the upgrade.
I meant center weighted metering. Not spot. The S has spot.
I have a Sony a7iv, xt5 and x100v . I’ve owned a lot of camera through multiple systems . I’ve bought the x100v 3 times lol my girlfriend calls it toxic ex I can’t get over . It’s definitely over hyped but I really do love the camera and enjoy shooting it over anything I’ve ever owned . Yes it could be better but so can a Leica . I enjoy the experience.
You are correct about setting expectations. I reckon there are many disappointed users expecting instant results due to influencers.
Your final comment is absolutely spot-on. I have no idea why people rave about Fuji *when they are only shooting RAW* and post-processing. I shoot straight out of camera JPEG with RAW only as a backup so I can later change the recipe in Fuji X RAW Studio. Coming from a DSLR it was a so refreshing not having to sit for hours post-processing RAW images on my PC.
For a "better" film look, also reduce the clarity (the camera takes a couple of seconds to process the image) and add a pro-mist filter to suite your taste. On my X-E4 I shoot greater than 640 ISO to get the grain/noise and take advantage of DR400 which only works at or above 640 ISO. Don't be afraid of ISO noise, use it, especially for B&W images. When using a recipe based on Acros I shoot at least 1,600+ if possible. The higher the ISO, the greater the "grain" on Acros.
I could not get on with the fixed 23mm so went from X100T to X-E3 then X-E4. I wish I started with my Fuji 35mm f2 rather than the 27mm f2.8 as 35mm on APS-C is more my style, the 35mm f2 is very quick and sharp. I got the cheaper plastic version without aperture ring, they are optically the same. The 27mm is useful for compactness.
I love my Fuji for jpeg, but if you are just going to shoot RAW, then get a different brand and post-process the hell out of the image to your hearts content, you are wasting your money on a Fuji and the auto-focus is superior on other brands.
A lot of people who are buying the x100v are already fuji shooters and we know what these cameras can do. The reason they buy this camera is for its simplicity, same reason why you would get a Q2. If you aren't a fuji shooter, I would recommend to first get something like X-T30ii which is way cheaper as its a more versatile then x100v while having the same (or similar) sensor, and is still quite small, especially if you combine it with one of the fuji's F2 lenses or a pancake lens.
I want to get x100v because I want a camera where i don't need to have the choice of which lens I will be using as well as being as small as possible. I will be having this camera as my daily family camera, as well as taking some BTS photos while I am filming videos for clients or weddings.
Correct!
One underrated aspect of the x100 series is how good they are as a family documentarian camera. I'm glad I have my iphone to take pictures of things I wouldn't otherwise get, but scrolling through my photos on my computer, I'm consistently impressed by much better my x100t photos look in comparison with the ones of the iphones that I've had along side it. Proneg Std (Noise Reduction -1, Highlights -1, Shadows +1) is just so good and is pure nostalgia.
I honestly think it is a great beginner camera though. Everything you need to adjust is on the outside of it. You don't have lens choices. It can be a little punishing if you don't plan your shots, but on full auto using Provia or Velvia, you'll get enough cool looking pictures to hook you.
So true!
The simplicity and lock-in into one 35mm f/2 prime lens breeds understanding. A beginner will learn what f/2 vs f/8 means, what 1/250th vs 1/10th means, what ISO160 vs 800 means on a bright sunny day.
There’s no better camera to learn the exposure triangle with.
@@MikeLikesChannel The built in ND makes it quite easy to achieve any shot though
good points! Most of the photos can be taken with a smartphone. And dont buy it for recipies, you custom make your own anyways. If you dont shoot people alot and mostly buildings, go for x100t, x100f or ricoh gr3. I used to shoot with canon 5dmk2, and its not as close to sony a7r4 on technical stuff but it made you think different. We have become lazy and expect the camera to do the job for us. I do love mine x100VI and alot of stuff to learn
Thanks for your honest opinion, and for not over-hyping the x100v with the craze that it went to on social media, that basically doubled its real price, up to about $2k used.
I just bought a Sony RX1R mk II, because for the same $2k you get something that is even rarer and way superior in IQ, to the x100v.
Sam i think one of the points you make near the begining about get a film camera if you want film is correct.The Fuji camera is very good , but i think its a photographers camera , and its brilliant for street , portraits etc . Its not a DSLR , it takes working and the dials etc make it like USING a film camera not film images .Thats the pleasure of using the Fuji .It will make you a much better photographer as you say if you stick with it .Its immensely satisfying as a photographer and the emulations are very very good, closer to film than some , but it is a digital camera not a film camera.I have used a lot of them and Canon top end DSLR cameras .The Fuji makes me smile and really enjoy photography. I never had the love of it the same when i was using DSLR cameras , as good as they are they have no mojo or real excitement they were just tools. I am 62 and started on film cameras , then DSLRs doing pro photography then sold the lot and got into the Fuji stuff and took the best pics i ever took in my life .
So to summarize, if you dont know how to USE the camera and arent willing to invest the time to LEARN how to USE the camera stick to an iphone and some insta filters.... The camera doesnt create the image, the photographer creates the image... This camera is a great photographic tool in the right hands. The learning curve isnt difficult but does require the time required to gain experience.
The way you talk is soooo hypnotic. Loved it!
If you wants to improve your photography I actually recommend going full film for a few months. As long as you understand the basics of composition, exposure, focal lengths.
When I first got into photography, using a film camera for a few months really forced me to consider all my shots, which made me think about my composition and exposure A LOT. When I do digital, I chimp a lot, and I don’t think that’s good habit. Not saying that digital is bad, but by forcing you to go full manual down to the film development, it really slows down your thought process and thinki through more of your shots, which really builds some artistic and technical character.
I had the first one and sold it, regretted it and went and bought the x100s and love it these two have a great look as you go they get more digital. As you say too clean and nice, i think youd love the first two, if you get a chance to use one of them i think you'll like either one.
You’re well on your way brother! Definitely got a good understanding of what you need to do to progress, and basically nailed everything on head! Keep it up.
Thank you!! 🤩
Throwing a black satin or a glimmer glass filter on the lens definitely helps too.
totally agree with you - it is not about the camera, but how good you are to take photos
Thank you for this video. People don’t understand the camera won’t make them a good photographer, you need to work on it. I feel the 100V is a specialty camera, and people how want it know what they are doing.
I got the camera the other day, and I agree with your review 100% It’s a great camera, but it really boils down to your skill as a photographer and editor 📸
Appreciate your frankness. I had one of the earlier x100s. And bought the X100v before all its hype came along. I opted to return it. They make too many concessions to form over function. For example, the limited size tabs on the aperture ring (hard to reach), and the need to add a thumb rest for a more secure grip on it. And i agree with you that the film presets are just ok, not more. Its not a bad camera, just over priced for what it is.
I have x100f. Im a simple man. Don’t need more lenses. I use a 4gb card usually. Photos can look like like film if you know how to use it.
Just have confidence in your photography. An alternative to this camera is the Leica CL
Fun fact - For the average person/shooter, film photography is about imperfections. Buying a super expensive, high megapixel, fixed focal length camera, auto everything with digital film simulations isn't going to replicate film. You have a better chance if you go backwards, not forwards. I have a Leica M8, the first digital M model from 2006, with a Kodak CCD sensor, it's fully manual and 10MP. The grain is there in the shadows or everywhere with the ISO at 640 and above, and the colours are on point (People say it's like shooting a neverending roll of Kodachrome, and tbh, they aren't wrong). It feels the exact same as shooting with my Leica M6. Sometimes I see a dead pixel line on some of the last images if I've shot a lot of photos that day, but for IG, nobody can see that; and again, imperfections. The dead pixel lines resemble the scratches you can sometimes get on film negatives. The only downside to the M8 is that it's terrible above 640 ISO, even at 640 it's a bit shit.
I've been looking at getting a 100F or 100V, mostly due to the hype surrounding it/them on the internet which you mentioned. I love 35mm focal lengths, street photography and film, it's all I shoot, so you can see my interest. I've seen a 100F for dirt cheap, and if they reply to me, then I might take it, purely for travel and some auto stuff for speed, convenience and for low light. But, we'll see, I kinda like my M8.
But yeah - if it's film you want to replicate, which is what this video seems to mostly be about, get a Leica M8 or something with a decent CCD sensor. I got lucky and got mine for £800 on Facebook marketplace in July this year.
This sounds cool I’ll have to give that a try 📷
I wish most UA-camrs, especially Fujifilm centered ones, emphasized the fact that the thought behind and process of taking a photo is far more important than the camera itself which is what you're saying here. Unfortunately that doesn't get clicks or revenues, which a lot of other gear-averse channels say. Thanks for doing good for the community!
Great video. Nice to hear you balance out some of the hype on this camera and speak the honest truth about results. It won’t magically make amazing photos - like all great images, it’s a combination of light, composition, lens rendering, and editing.
The series of photos from the bar are great. The fun you had shooting this is shown in the results. Nice stuff. 👍🏼
Thank you Craig 🙏🏻🤩🎥
I just bought a preowned one last night on eBay. I got the all-black version. I cannot wait for it to arrive. I already have a camera, but I wanted something that I could carry around on my way to work or when I go on walks with my dog. I have my Sony A7IV for the more serious work.
Ooooo the black one 😍😍😍😍😍😍 swap? 😂 I hope you enjoy it. Let us know how you get on
Thanks for making this, I need to hear that I need to improve my photography not my gear
You got the Fuji! I still think my favorite photos with it are shot RAW and then I color them more like film 🤷♂️ the simulations are nice for quick shots, street photography. But I love my RAWs more. The softness of the colors and tones still comes through and that’s what I love about the Fuji look.
It is a nice image still. I think I just want a little more softness. Maybe the T with less mp would be better? 🤔📸
@@SamHollandif you want more softness add one of the lens attachments, it’ll soften up!
Honestly i think you'd prefer the original x100 with its amazing sensor. Although i see the price has gone crazy..@@SamHolland
Love the fact you're into fujifilm as well!! I use to shoot on a Canon and then started doing video with Lumix and a GH5 and G9 combo but switched to Fuji with an X-T3 and X-T4 combo 2 years ago. My X-T3 is still my bread and butter, run and gun video rig. I've put miles on that camera with corporate projects over the last few years!! My X-T4 is my favourite camera though, I've put in my own recipes and presets for photos. Just slap a 23mm F1.4 prime on the front and its a fantastic walk around/street combo. The X-T4 goes everywhere with me.
🤩🙏🏻📹
Have had mine for a year. Equipped it with K&F Concept magnetic UV which completes the weather sealing and supports the K&F magnetic CPL which nests in a cheap plastic lens cap on a lanyard of fly fishing line. Now I have what I want: a digital version of my ancient Leica III-f shooting in RAW on a fine sensor with full manual control of exposure and access to focus mag, peaking, shutter delay, ND filter without menu diving. I'm happy to give up the look and limitation of all film but prefer the tactile ergonomics of my relic Leica over the confusing and limiting automatic programs of many modern cameras, and that is where my fun factor is. This is a camera which can always be with me, walking, hiking, bicycling. I never use the film simulations and always shoot all cameras (other than my iPhone) in RAW.
The lens is not a sharp as are my best FF lenses from Sony, Zeiss and Voigtlander, particularly when at MFD, but Topaz Sharpening and LrC texture recover that look, and I could never do that with film!
Paid $450 over MSRP for an open box used x100v and no regrets.
You can pull up your "film roll" through the viewfinder and see a good crisp representation. It's like a pocket sized light table and loupe.
I started in the 90s with a Canon AE1 and films inside (old school)- now I own a Sony A7III since it came out and I have some decent lenses and I'm happy with it. I had a Fujifil X-T5 for one day to be lighter, smaller and more with the film simulations for streetphotography. And after I tried it I decided to stick with my old A7III. :-D
Funny fact, the guy I bought my X-S10 from upgraded to the X100V, he later messaged me he regretted the decision and sent it back and bought another X-S10 - it’s basically an X100V with IBIS and interchangeable lenses and you can get a pancake lens to get nearly identical portability.
I’ll have to check this out. Thanks for sharing
@@scotttucker9613 What unique features is it missing exactly? - it has many dials, you can set them to do what you want, like ISO, shutter, even aperture if you use a lens without an aperture ring.
Yeah I also had it and sold it after 6 days of use. I think that the best oldschool digital photo camera that shoots close to film is the Oly Pen-F.
Oooo yes people have been talking about this one too
Yes! This is the truth. I had this exact experience. You can also do a number on yourself by getting a new expensive full frame or a 3000$ lens. Great video.
I don't fully get it. You make it sound like the cam is not that good.
But OF COURSE it comes down to skill. With every camera.
I do photography for 20+ years now and just recently got the x100v. And It gets me so hyped to go out and shoot. Film recipes are dope. Low light capabilities are sick and image quality is awesome. So please don't make it sound like the x100v is bad in any way 😄
It’s a 3 year old camera. I like my X-S20 for the larger grip, better battery, better autofocus, flip out screen & video abilities. It’s rather small with the 27mm pancake. You can try different recipes to get the look you want with any of their cameras. No way would I pay more than retail for that camera when you can buy a used X-T30 and get a similar experience. I do think film simulations make taking pictures more fun. Great travel cameras
It is super fun not having to worry about editing 🤩
@@SamHolland I have the XT 30 II and I love the options.
OMG, I can't believe that someone finally said it, great video!
Thank you 🤩🙏🏻🎥
Wow. This is the first no-nonsense test of this phone I've seen and the first time someone even mentions the bokeh performance! It could as well be an ad for this phone. I'm looking for a replacement for my pixel and I'm curious about Sony, but you can't really learn much about them. And even when some tech reviewer decides to test one of their phones, it's usually 'the auto camera mode could be better' without getting into any details. This is exactly what I was looking for.
The X100f I used for travel, family, and street photos had an accident in February and no longer functions. So I bought a Pixel 8 Pro cellphone thinking it could be an adequate replacement, instead of getting an X100VI. Surprisingly, images from the Pixel 8 Pro that I can compare to images taken with the X100f are comparable and often better. Now will it so the same job in all circumstances that the X100VI can handle with its leaf shutter and built-in ND filter? Not likely, but to be determined in the future.
As I'm hearing your objectives about this camera, try Olympus EM5 mark iii. If you're up to retro design, the silver/black version is just gorgeous. You have tones of little inexpenses lenses to choose from - you can be more creative and experimenting with different looks. You can of course shoot RAW and/or JPG and download pics directly to your phone via build in wifi. You can tweek the curve for highlights and shadows and you can shoot directly with the BW filter on. 21mpx is enough if you want to shoot JPEG and image stabilization is just great. Hit the second hand markets for a great deal, this fuji is a bit of a hype racing the price higher.
I bought the x100s to start on and I agree you need to practise a lot with the film recipes
I've been shooting with the Sony A7 series for about 10 years and Conon before that & some film cameras along the way.
I bought an X100f a few months ago mainly for the experience of using it plus the small/light form factor. I use it with OVF only & no image review and for general [non important] photos it is a joy to use. Yes, the A7Riii and 35GM produces much "better" images, but the X100f is still regularly used.
if your looking for the film look out of the camera rangefinder style, get a X-E1 / X Pro-1 or the OG X100
Hi , Can I ask you why those cameras will have more film look ?
And if you have to choose one of those which on you’ll get.
@@FaridBoulmeck SENSOR...it's old with it's limitations back in the day, by the time we got to the X100T it was clinical and waxy looking. The newer cameras just can't replicate the film look out of the camera (need to post edit) they are too clean like a phone ...lol. I have all 3 and use the X-E1 and X100 mostly due to size, but when I feel like showing off the X-Pro1 is the nicest to use as it's bigger & feels like a tool not a toy. Choice is yours, probably go in to a camera store and play around with the X-Pro3/ X100 and X-E4.... they are almost identical in size from the old models and google images from these cameras (also consider X100S for film look)
@@bobbubevski2719 Thank you very much for taking the time to answer me in such detail.
The Fuji xe-4 is a wonderful cheaper alternative, with possibility to switch lenses! I enjoy shooting it and learning street photography with it.
What’s the difference between the two ?
Good points Sam, I love the fuji cameras and with fuji weekly recipes (thanks Reggie) I have loved the new "filmic" looks I have achieved and become a better photographer because of it. I say win win.
Mid Shin WHACK - ouch ! Couldn't Agree more it not about the gear until you have some IDEA - cracking watch buddy !
Haha thank you brother 🤩🙏🏻📸
@@SamHolland always a pleasure
Simple, stopping floating into hypes, have a personality, it will help a lot.
Great video. What the hype starters don't tell you, because they've got all the gear and no idea, is that part of the reason your film camera is so different to the X100 series, or any digital, is the lens. Film and digital will never look the same, but an interchangeable lens camera with a vintage lens and the right film recipe will get you mostly there..... but a fixed modern lens will never hit the right spot without RAW manipulation. Save your money, buy something like an X-T1, a good adapter and a Helios 44-2 or a Zuiko Auto-w.
Very good video, I had the x100t for a few months, and then I had to sell it for financial reasons. I'm saving up for the x100v now and I think it will be worth it, and there are things I think I'll really appreciate after having the T.
I don't know what the x100v's screen is like, but with the x100t I preferred to use the electronic viewfinder, since it was much more representative of the final image.
Looove the honest review Sam. You are one of my fav channels right now. I have the x100v but I find I can get similar images when I shoot with my sony zv1. Just dont take it out with me as much as I want to. Professionally I am a panasonic shooter, I want something for everyday use too. Keep it up man. Big thumbs up from me.
Thank you! 🤩🙏🏻🎥
Thanks for your honest feedback! Really appreciate it.
My pleasure 🤩🙏🏻 thank YOU
I love the camera... kind of! It's expensive, the experience is good with it. It gives a look quicker! Great video man!
I’m just gonna stick with my Nikon Z8 and either edit the photos myself or use one of there built in picture controls. This camera doesn’t sound like it’s got me.. the size was the main selling point
Your journey will lead you to the camera doesnt matter, its the photographer🦉
For me, putting an old vintage lens on my Fuji XT4 with the film simulation presets makes the picture look “old” right the way. I dont think this x100v is worth the value
What camera strap is that?
I have had this camera now for some time; hold onto it and continue to use it. It’s more versatile than you know based on this video. That being said It’s not my go to camera since i got the Ricoh gr3 ( not recommended for the look and ease that your after). For the more retro / film look consider an m10/m240 and a low contrast lens.
Take the jpg/raw option. I know it takes more space but when you learned some editing you gonna love changing some shots to the better
When you learn some photography you will love getting SooC results.
I would get one, but without thinking about simulating a film camera. I guess I would be satisfied. On the other hand, more affordable Fuji models with a couple small primes would be a better deal.
Man I wish I can learn from you in person! Love your videos man!
Thank you! 🤩🙏🏻 I do 1-1 video tutorials. DM me on IG if you want to know more. (I temporarily took them off my website while I update it)
my all time favorite film like-digital camera was the X-30 that I gifted over 8 years ago and longed for another ever since however the used price is higher than it was new. It had tons of film simulations including Acros and Clasic Chrome. and lots of quirky/fun art filters, I only shot in JPEG and wasted no time in photoshop.
The reason I gave it away is because the girl I gave it to was in a 3rd world country and couldnt afford any camera. So me with first world problems to worry about at that time, like having the highest megapixels possible and a full frame sensor and the X30 was quickly loosing the race with a 1/1.7 inch sensor and a lowly 12 megapixels. Wow I had the perfect film like camera and didnt even realize it. Live and Learn.
So now I am about to get the X100VI or spend half as much on a Canon R50 with kit lens as both have amazing autofocus. Now if Olympus would only come out with a new PEN-F... Oh Bother...
Being a bit rangefinder shooter (Kiev 4a) I didn't like X100V nor X-PRO3. I'm quite pleased with my X-T3, but there's some major cons as well
The journey is the best part.
Nice video. Thank you for making it. I have a Fuji X100s and like it a lot. When I decided to upgrade to the X100v, it was too late. There are none to be had, not at list price. I agree with someone else's comment that the goal of the X100v seems to be all about film simulation and recipes. This is the latest hipster trend; I don't care about this. I also don't care about the flip screen. If that was not there I would like the camera even more. The X100 sensor and processor are the things that make this camera excel. According to other information, the X100v lens has some improvements over previous models. You did not even mention that. In my mind, the sensor, processor, and lens make this a fantastic camera. If I can ever find one for MSRP I will buy one. Thanks again.
If you don't know if photography is actually your thing and buying a new camera and definitely want Fuji, there's plenty of cheaper and more versatile versions you can get and every single one has these film simulations to play with. Don't fall for the looks of the camera. From Fuji I'd pick something like x-s10 or x-T30 II with some small zoom just to get hang of how different focal lengths work and it would still be way cheaper than X100V/VI
Get a cheap 49mm clear filter. Use black or silver spray paint and get a fine mist on the inside of the filter. This will soften the image a bit and create halation or glow. Now, your high-tech camera will look more like an old film camera with a old lens. Or just buy a pro mist or glimmer glass filter.
I like everything about it but the focus by wire is just bad.
If you aren't into manual focusing quickly, it wont be a problem. Otherwise, get another (fuji) camera with a solid manual focusing lens.
Sucks that you'll lose the cool viewfinder and the flash. But oh well. At least you can focus.
Thanks so much for the honest review Sam. You made a lot of great points. Yes so much hype on this camera and you have helped me decide to buy or not to buy. Thanks again
Hey. I’m so pleased this helped. It is a great camera still. Thanks for watching 🤩🙏🏻📸
10:00
Learn about the DR400 mode and highlight curves. You will never have to underexpose an image to preserve highlights.
Hi Sam, thanks for your thoughts on the “V”. I have also just watched yours friends “V” opinion. It has become common to see options like yours and your friends about the “ film like” IQ, but you never say what film type you are comparing it to. I am not a film shooter so I am not experienced enough to be specific, but I think it’s unrealistic to compare an image taken in Astia(?) and compare it to an image shot on Kodachrome (?) I assume an experienced film shooter would load a specific film to suit the conditions of the day. And that if those conditions changed the results might not be real indications of what the film type is capable of. So those images might not be considered, relative to the specific film, film like. So short of carrying multiple cameras with multiple film types to make the best images the film type can produce you can’t guarantee the perfect “film” look. So as I said, you need to spacific if you are going to speculate on any given image. I think you would need to, to be far, bracket the film simulation, and then compare the results with images taken with the original film stock. This is an observation not criticism, I have owned the “F” and “V”.
do you just take eye-level shots of walls and stuff?
This is basically Google Street View with filters
Thanks for this amazing video!
Really want this camera for the reasons you mention and mostly to have a good Jpeg shooter as I dont really like editing photos.
That said you saved me some money being so honest. Will keep my M50 for now and use that more just to learn as Im still a newbie but then down the road if I keep taking photos I might switch to Fuji or something smilliar :D
Hey. So pleased this helped 🤩
Brilliant video. The kind of honest review I needed.
About the white balance; you can even fix it in JPEG, it's really not much of a big deal, as long as it isn't too bad.
Finally, a realistic review of the this camera. Hype train stops here, folks. Time to get off.
Ohhhhh it's a hater that can't find one!!! Lmfao if yall ain't a dime a dozen. Just go prepay at b&h you'll have one and be taking pictures for the FUN OF IT AGAIN.
@@pjbiggleswerth8903 It's not being able to not find one. I just refuse to pay more than MSRP for even a used one and/or pay and wait who the hell knows how long to get a brand new one at the price it should be.
No.
Fuji fangirls are mad at this comment 😂
Im still getting it regardless i fuck with it
Hello there.
Nice videos, by the way. I wonder where do you buy your green strap? I love it!
Thank you and have a nice one
I've been shooting for over 30 years and I have the camera for you that gets that filmic look right out of camera for really good price. Is the Olympus e500 or the e300 it has a Kodak TCD sensor which is the same as they have in the Leica cameras done
i subscribed because you said the TRUTH..love it ! keep them coming.. GREAT REVIEW
I love the shots you took with it!
Thank you! 🤩🙏🏻📸
Ya I don’t know anything about photography, but I still want to get this camera. Been thinking about getting a good camera for a while. I’m going to try to take some time to learn though
Get yourself the cheapest mirrorless you can of any brand before you commit to an expensive one. You can pick up some bargain early Sony mirrorless cameras.
Weird that the optical viewfinder is not mentioned. This is the one thing that this camera has that is unique to any other camera. Yes there is the Leica M_ but the Fuji hybrid optical viewfinder has digitral overlays so arguably could be described as more advanced.
you are the best, dude. thank you foor your honesty!
You’re the best!!! 🤩🙏🏻🎥 thank YOU
Good points and a very honest review! Your images are impressing!
Thank you, Michael
Appreciate the candid review and advice.
Another great video, Sam! I really like that you put your honest opinion, not just simply following the trend. And the way how you speak and explain things is so somehow resonate with me )) It looks like if I explained something myself )) Also likes Panasonics cameras of course... and Sigma lenses by the way =))
Do you have a link for that camera strap? It even looks cooler than the X100V :D
So many great photos you've taken 👍👌
Thank you! 🤩🙏🏻📸 I took about six hundred million so these are just my favs 😂
Nice video Sam - 100% correct!!
since you seem to be focused on making digital look like film, can you tell me who's work to look at to see film looking images?
...from a perspective like no other....excellent!
a humble photographer you are
🙏🏻
What Recipes were you using in this video?
Which was the B&W one?
What's that strap you use? It's beautiful.
I dont understand your complaint. If you want to buy into the hype so much that your expectations are not met, then you worry too much about other peoples opinions. Buy the camera, use the camera over time, then decide. The rest is fanciful clickbait
I don't think this camera is for me because it lacks the flexibility in lens selection with its fixed focal length which is essentially a 35mm for a full frame. I would have suggest people looking for this camera look at X-TX0 series type camera from Fuji. It can be a Fuji XT20, XT30, XT30ii. You can mixed and match different lenses like Fuji's own 23mm F1.4, 23mm F2 or Viltrox 23mm F1.4, or 35mm F2, XC-35mm F2 (which is very cheap) or 33mm Viltrox/Tokina or 30mm Sigma. There are just so many of these 23mm-50mm primes for the Fuji APSC cameras that are cheap and good. I am still using XT20 at the moment and I only shoot jpegs. Going for forward I might look at newer generation of XTX0, the reason I like the Xt20 type camera is their size and weight, all these cameras are just slightly over 350 grams and put a 23mm or 35mm APSC lens like the ones mentioned and they barely weighs in at around 500 grams, the resolution of the photos from these cameras are good enough for sharing with friends and they looks good with minimum editing.