What about Alex lab? I just saw him made the arm from 6ys ago and I saw made the center thing 😅😅 sorry man idk about other stuff I just know him just now😅
Yeah, impact mitigation only works off of the principle of decreasing the acceleration of the body during a collision, but all the energy is still effectively transferred through the body. The exoskeleton could ensure a body wouldn’t dent or deform on impact, but bruising and internal issues like concussions and internal bleeding are definitely still possible. And still, your car can absorb a decent amount of energy from a collision because it’s very large and has lots of crumple zones to distribute most of the energy into deforming the car’s material. An iron man suit is too small to employ something of that nature.
You organs are inside a meat bag... The exoskeleton might keep our skeleton in shape... But our organs can take so much before you get internal bleeding all over the place.
An iron man suit is possible if you take away the single limitations of it needing to be the size of the wearer. Just a foot taller would give the suit so much more space to add all this stuff and still look human shaped.
the suit does make Tony much taller, idk how tall he is regularly but he gets to be about 6'3 in the movies atleast for the mk 2 and 3. in the comics he gets to about 6'5 so those souts arent that skin tight, they do have a ton of stuff in them that even for him is impossible (atleast in the first few movies, we dont count the mk 50 with the nano tech)
Making Space Marine/Fallout styles of Power Armor is a lot more plausible. Biggest problem would be the energy device and the flying. I don't think a suit carrying hydraulics powerful enough to lift the titanium and gold alloy plates will be able to fly unless you have something incredibly powerful as both the battery and the systems for propulsion. Even with that tech you are *not* going to be flying like a F-22 Raptor, at best it'll be more akin to the speed and height limits of a Helicopter unless it's some absolutely insane technology we cannot even fathom today. The only real world applications for a suit like this would probably be more in the logistics branch of the military. Personnel being able to carry massive amounts of cargo in a more flexible and natural manner could help it reach the front lines faster, maybe it could even be used to carry injured soldiers away from danger with more ease. At best maybe the suit could be used for bomb diffusing and clearing buildings but if it's warfare akin to what we're seeing in Ukraine? Forget about it. Power Armor in no man's land sticks out like a sore thumb, one drone with enough C4 strapped to it hitting the right spot (such as the joints of the armor) and it's over for the pilot.
Biggest reason we cant build an iron suite is we do not have the portable power source strong enough to keep it powered up to replecate on the movie. If so we would have the problems with the electric cars.
The repulsors arent “reactionless forces.” As you said, he experiences recoil when its just the glove. When he has the whole suit on, the suit absorbs the energy. It has some sort of electrical actuator system that grants stark super strength, and that same system pushes back against the recoil to keep his arm stable for aiming. And i’ve heard theories that it isnt actually a pure energy/laser weapon but instead is accelerating air particles. Basically a super compact and super advanced jet engine that can either accelerate a steady stream of particles for flight or fire a short and powerful pulse for combat. The suit as a whole is effectively just a strength-enhancing exosuit combined with a jetpack. I think it is absolutely possible to build, but the real one would be considerably bigger and bulkier than what we see in the movies
@@Sandeee I mean seeing as we condensed computers from massive machines that took up entire labs to tiny phones in our pockets, id say chances are a fully functioning suit exactly as portrayed in the movie is possible. Its just far beyond what we can do with current technology
You can see it when he first tests the repulsor in iron man 1. He gets flung backwards when it fires. But once he builds the suit, he no longer has to deal with the recoil
@@orange_turtle3412 the best way to replicate this energy is by using something called brown gas it's hydrogenchloride gas which can be used for both a quick repulsor flame or a quite hard repulsor blast, if you've watched @ALEX LAB then you would've seen how he's done it
@@Flash_Fan9k as much as i love the channel of the Russian guy you are mentioning its mainly just for the gimmick and the UA-cam views… he made hydrogen hand torchs 🤷🏼♂️
@@tonyromano8337I think that is slightly understating what he has done. He made very good electrolyzer to replace the arc reactor, rockets, browns gas muscles, and repulsor. But yea, nowhere near iron man
@@anishkommireddy4429 I rewatched his new video and some of the old ones too, he was on the right track but its not as interesting anymore now its just to look cool and nice sadly…
Comics using science in their writing often have to make 'creative' liberties to make things work out as they blatantly violate our known physical laws. For example, a modern tank shell is the literal culmination of a century of research, blood and sweat. They are made to even penetrate and destroy the strongest thickest armor made out of different high grade materials. Yet, Ironman's suit which has the thickness of metal sheet made out of titanium and gold (which are standard in the military industry) can stop a tank shell? Not to mention even if it could, the person inside would suffer massive internal trauma. So yeah as much as we can make certain dreams come true, the thing we see in comics will not become true unless we break reality.
Even if there was somehow a super material to make the suit out of, that makes it un penetrable to all current weapons, someone would simply use that same material to make a bullet or weapon that can penetrate it
4:04 This bit is easy to explain away: The suit accounts for the recoil as well, and simply has systems in place to absorb the energy. It also explains the discrepancy between full suit and glove only; With just the glove, there's not enough space to install the systems needed to counteract the recoil, hence obvious recoil.
You don't need an arc reactor to power a suit, we already have big companies with jetpacks like gravity, and also people go on their garage and make lasers that can shoot out.
I do like gravity for their jetpack design and its function. But I think I would do one on my own design for thrust and flight. (Not that I’m dissing gravity tho)😅
@@Keallz911high pressure gas has a high chance of a fire explosion. Fuel cells don’t produce enough energy for constant/continuous flight especially in sizes that would be required for a man sized suit yet they don’t make enough energy yet.
Arc reactor shouldn’t be needed. Yeah, it’s not gonna be unlimited flight, and it will probably die, but using Solid State Batteries would give it a decent amount of power. Would be suprised if it could fly even close to an hour, but still.
It’s not possible because it’s a miniature arc reactor in the suit that makes large amounts of self sustaining energy in real life a reactor is gigantic and it’s run by nuclear fusion nobody has made a small arc reactor like Tony did in the cave because it violates the conservation of energy law we would need years of technological advancement to do something like that
I remember reading Iron Man comics as a kid, the craziest thing I thought was that the suit is controlled cybernetically from the helmet. Does not seem so far fetched now.
4:00 the reason he seems to not have recoil is because the full suit also enhances his strength, allowing him to shrug off the recoil. also it's likely a plasma blast, not a laser.
And i don't understand why so many youtubers who's interested in making an IRON MAN suit isn't making the legs propultionary because he's not just depending on the arm's carrying all his bodyweight it's the feet too, that's what he uses to stabelize himself with.
@@Xieru *OH BULLSHIT THEY ARE NOT*, if you's think for a nanosecond that the arms are all that's carrying his ENTIRE bodyweight u are dumber than an ameba. His legs do as much heavy lifting as the arms if not twice as much.
The U.S. military's "Iron Man" project, the Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit (TALOS), was a program to develop a robotic exoskeleton to improve soldiers' abilities on the battlefield. The project was met with skepticism and hype, and the final product was not a comic book-style super suit. However, the program did lead to the development of several technologies that are still being used today. Here are some of the things that were planned for the TALOS suit: Exoskeleton: The suit would have an exoskeleton to increase the wearer's strength and endurance. Helmet: The suit would have a helmet with a heads-up display. Sensors: The suit would have sensors to monitor the wearer's vital signs. Liquid armor: The suit may have used liquid armor that could transform from a liquid to a solid when an electrical current or magnetic field was applied. Body armor: The suit would have light, impenetrable body armor. Cameras: The suit would have cameras to provide the wearer with information about their environment. The TALOS program was never a formal program of record, but the technology developed for the program is still being used today.
A new idea: plasma. We make a loop with plasma you ignite the gas with a sparker and a battery and you tap into the plasma for electricity then feed that into the battery for charging making a loop. Then you add in the suit in the loop and the whole thing is turned into a sort of self perpetuating loop. Some problems I have come up with this problem: one the gases. Two the burnout of the battery. Three compactness and gas storage. My main thing was to see if the idea would work. Problem solving can come later. Plus added benefit we only need this part for powering the suit and we only need enough electricity to power the suit.
Based off how the suit flies in the movies, it looks like they use some form of ionic propulsion which in real life, would require a tremendous amount of power to produce enough thrust as a jet. In the case of a suit, it would have to be a power source similar to that of an arc reactor. As of today, we don’t have the technological capabilities of making that. Most jets and rockets use liquid fuel. An iron man suit wouldn’t have any room for such “fuel”, otherwise one might as well fly a jet in place of a suit.
@@rednaxelaproductions7560 it’s essentially a form of propulsion that accelerates positive ions to produce thrust. Existing forms are highly efficient but they don’t produce enough thrust.
@@anishkommireddy4429 Nah that's $hit armour, you want ACTUALLY bullet proof, you come see me. I mean actually something you can wear and jump, move and fight in that will also totally protect you from even high calibre rounds, I got the design for that
Alan you are smart for saying this because that is the point of making suits and realistic, we don't need or want all that sci fi shit flying and lasers, we want power, we want strength and durability to crush anything, we want to be invulnerable to stupid bullets from stupid guns! We want to be better than human! If you want bullet proof I'm your guy, but also my designs offer you the ability to get ran over by construction vehicles with tracks that way A LOT! Maybe even more, haven't tested, but also with superior interior protection and absorbing meaning you will not only be able to get tossed around like a rag doll even by vehicles but you'll be able to destroy anything and anyone with no effort and feel nothing at all, you can plow through anything!
The lift thing can actually work. Everything can create lift when fast enough, and Tony can fly supersonic, so yea. Also missiles fly like that aswell without wings.
I know I am late. But an Iron Man suit is possible. We just don’t have the advanced materials yet. Stark doesn’t really share his advanced technology with the world and everything he builds is private. We also don’t have geniuses like Tony who are motivated to create a real Iron Man suit.
@@lorddio4280if someone has a lot of money like Elon musk and if he wants to build an iron suit I guarantee you he can make something pretty damn close
I would be able to suspend my disbelief and just say that Tony was a genius who invented a super material that can somehow break the laws of physics by being harder than steel but soft enough to absorb impacts like a pillow at the same time, except the movie told us his suit was made of gold titanium alloy, which is basically just regular metal
AI isn't a problem. AI-aided design is real and up to the task. Mechanical systems for physical strength are relatively straightforward. Flight with anything resembling a reasonable and compact/useful design.....meh....not so much right now, despite that goofy 4-jet pack thing those guys made. Power delivery. That's currently still a problem, but solutions are on the horizon, including iron-air batteries, aluminum-air batteries, graphene-based batteries (which alone would offer an exponent more capacity with drastically reduced size/weight) and even some other power-delivery methods I'm not going to speak of. In it's movie incarnation, it's not possible yet. But the hurdles are diminishing.
No, this is not "why". The way of generating or storing energy has nothing to do with the fact that any material just can't protect us from kinetic energy. Empty a mag on whatever Iron Man's helmet and the kinetic energy will just compress and splash the brain of its user. That's it, endgame. Simple physics problem.
Hacksmit made a video where he made John wicks bullet proof suit. So making the Iron man suit protect us is the only realistic thing it can do now. If we can build a bullet proof blazer. Then I think we can make a explosion proof iron man suit
and thats assuming you can even make an impenetrable armour, his armour is only 1cm thick at best, there is no material in the world that would save him, a simple ak47 could easily shred his suit, let alone tank rounds and anti armour rounds
Honestly I'd just say do the bigger suit suggestions in the comment, thicker armor, more layers of padding, thicker layers of padding, amazing exoskeleton stuff Though me personally? I'd just ignore defensiveness completely unless you're planning on making a straight up gundam, just focus on the mobility and protecting the user from the AR, a near human sized f-22 suit would be absolutely busted, so much smaller, harder to hit and can fit through more gaps
Well, if in our lifetime, I believe the only possible Iron Man suits would be the Hulk Buster and Igor armors. It’s massive, can store fuel for thrusters, maybe some housing for some sort of arm repulsors and some space for weapons, high power lasers, etc. Welp, we’re limited by the technology of our times lol
For the repulsars recoil, when he has the suit it adjusts for the recoil, that is why when he just has the glove he experiences recoil since the suit is not adjusting for him.
The suit would be so brittle and easy to damage irl with how many thin layers of metal it has. Also there's the saying that goes "The more moving parts something has, the more likely it is to break", and it has hundreds of tiny moving parts in it
Guys I have a theory you know in captain America the first avenger that bald dude and red skull make that laser thing with the glowing cube the tesseract powered it and made the same sound as iron man’s early repulses and since well the us captured it what if his suit is powered by a piece of the tesseract think about it
Just as the scientist trying to replicate the suit in Iron Man 1 said “The technology for it doesn’t exist yet” and then got yelled at, is how we should see all this. The technology doesn’t exist YET
6:02 this is a point that is rarely to never discussed. In Iron Man he struggled to catch a car with his suit. But in Civil War, Tony shows Peter a clip of Spider-Man catching a similar SUV with ease.
The horizontal flight is possible, but it needs to have some wings. If you look at the tomahawk cruise missile, it is mostly cylindrical with some fins on the rear, and some stub wings near the center. The tomahawk missile is much heavier than a human, weighing 2,900 lbs, but can still fly using stub wings and a speed of over 500 mph. But since the human body isn't perfectly cylindrical, it performs less efficiently as a lifting body, but at a sufficient speed, stub wings might work to create stable horizontal flight. Another method would be to create a "webbing" between the arms and legs, like a wingsuit. That's actually exactly how the latest powered wingsuit works.
I'd say the Mjolnir armor from Halo is the more realistic thing to eventually be created if the power situation can be figured out. The inertial dampeners on the Iron Man suit seem like the most difficult thing to create. You'd pretty much have to invent antigravity to cancel out G-forces.
I would say the power source and money is the only limitations in late 2024. I’m sure the military has probably has Ironman suits or something similar for years.
@@lorddio4280tbh, yeah. Tech isn't always so efficient, and compact in its first iterations. Look at storage on computers, we went from using massive hard disk drives to small and compact solid state drives. We need to first start making some of these parts for the suit a reality, doesnt matter how big. When we know for sure that those specific things are possible, we try put them into a wearable suit, also doesnt matter how big, as long as it is possible to utilise. Then, we slowly try to shrink the tech as much as possible, whilst keeping the efficiency.
@@lorddio4280yeah Iron monger is basically what tony started with, a very VERY (relatively) primitive, heavily protective armor with flamethrowers attached, bulky movement and just some strength boosts
Even though people might think it's impossible to build an reactor arc, or even an ionic reactor potent enough as the one of Iron Man, that's false, mainly because we have everything to build an arc reactor, but people still didn't figure out that our wastes are the answer to building an mini ionic reactor .
Dude, be realistic. Comic book characters aren't bound by the physical laws that reality is. They break Physics all the time; Iron Man is no exception. There are just some things that the suit can do in the movies that aren't physically feasible AT ALL. You can't, for example, accelerate yourself to absurd speeds and come to a sudden stop without destroying your body instantaneously. There's just no technology that does, or probably ever can exist, even in the distant future, that can change the velocity of an object from the high velocities seen in the movies to zero velocity, instantly, without the forces involved placing extreme stresses on that object, and in a tiny bit of space (eg, an Iron man suit's wall thickness). The impacts Tony takes in the movies would turn him to liquid, regardless of whether the suit could handle the impact.
8:32 The problem with this analysis is that many fixate on the term “reactor” but the way the arc reactor is displayed in the MCU, it has more in common with a high tech battery than an nuclear or fusion reaction.
you really just gotta understand that for all the moving plates to conflict in space, they would have to be extremely thin leaving basically no protection, if the dude wearing them could even move at all.
The real problem I see, is with the limbs ... joints: you can do it if it's not protective, but if you wanna have the joints armered, you'll probably won't move a muscle anymore. There is no way to cheat biology / physiology.
I'm maybe just making myself look dumb but the way people looking at iron man suit is wrong they thinking about the suit as a full suit that if want to fix the suit you need to remove parts and break it apart but it's wrong the "suit" is not a suit but parts that Tony combined which means the boots the hands the arms all have inside all that the technology and the gold and red parts are just there to hide those parts and provide an armor he built the boots and put a gold and red parts in the outside but the entire boots is pure tech not some gold and red and behind it some things that will help it fly which is why he could fit all that tech in boots because the boots are pure tech and the gold and red are just the cover
1) Who? 2) Define "Iron Man suit". I'd define it as "Does ALL the things the suit in the movie does." 3) Define "actually works". In what way does it "actually work"?
You can subscribe to see more videos just like this 👉: bit.ly/3C4g7EU
Watch this next : ua-cam.com/video/bB7929yRbkw/v-deo.html
What about Alex lab? I just saw him made the arm from 6ys ago and I saw made the center thing 😅😅 sorry man idk about other stuff I just know him just now😅
@@SeanErnstHuerva the hacksmith also built something similar😅
@@adam19lol81 yeah but you know forgot stuff again
Me studying mechanical engineering just to build my own iron man suit, parents think I just want a good career
Is not that bad tho. Your career will be your source money to make the suit happen. Keep it up!
Nice better go to US , collaborate with people's already working on it,
Basically same thing here I wanna learn mechanical engineering for my own projects not for the career
Bro I’m not alone, we all stumble across mechanical engineering to be like stark lol.
If you manage to build it, you're the next Tony Stark.
He has an exoskeleton to support the wearer so recoil could be reduced and the impacts of landings could be reduced
Doesn't erase kinetic energy. The wearer would still receive full impact of jumping off any height, no matter what they're wearing.
Yeah, impact mitigation only works off of the principle of decreasing the acceleration of the body during a collision, but all the energy is still effectively transferred through the body. The exoskeleton could ensure a body wouldn’t dent or deform on impact, but bruising and internal issues like concussions and internal bleeding are definitely still possible. And still, your car can absorb a decent amount of energy from a collision because it’s very large and has lots of crumple zones to distribute most of the energy into deforming the car’s material. An iron man suit is too small to employ something of that nature.
@@homieboi5352 mah trust ik how to fix that
@davidsirmons they'd become a mushed pushed up against the wall of the suit
You organs are inside a meat bag... The exoskeleton might keep our skeleton in shape... But our organs can take so much before you get internal bleeding all over the place.
An iron man suit is possible if you take away the single limitations of it needing to be the size of the wearer. Just a foot taller would give the suit so much more space to add all this stuff and still look human shaped.
the suit does make Tony much taller, idk how tall he is regularly but he gets to be about 6'3 in the movies atleast for the mk 2 and 3. in the comics he gets to about 6'5 so those souts arent that skin tight, they do have a ton of stuff in them that even for him is impossible (atleast in the first few movies, we dont count the mk 50 with the nano tech)
Yeah, like that mech version of Iron man where he fought Hulk could be a little possible
Making Space Marine/Fallout styles of Power Armor is a lot more plausible.
Biggest problem would be the energy device and the flying.
I don't think a suit carrying hydraulics powerful enough to lift the titanium and gold alloy plates will be able to fly unless you have something incredibly powerful as both the battery and the systems for propulsion.
Even with that tech you are *not* going to be flying like a F-22 Raptor, at best it'll be more akin to the speed and height limits of a Helicopter unless it's some absolutely insane technology we cannot even fathom today.
The only real world applications for a suit like this would probably be more in the logistics branch of the military.
Personnel being able to carry massive amounts of cargo in a more flexible and natural manner could help it reach the front lines faster, maybe it could even be used to carry injured soldiers away from danger with more ease.
At best maybe the suit could be used for bomb diffusing and clearing buildings but if it's warfare akin to what we're seeing in Ukraine? Forget about it. Power Armor in no man's land sticks out like a sore thumb, one drone with enough C4 strapped to it hitting the right spot (such as the joints of the armor) and it's over for the pilot.
An iron man suit is plausible if you remove the human component and make it fully robotic. Otherwise there are too many compromises
yall should read my comments, maybe it'll help you think a bit more clearly
Biggest reason we cant build an iron suite is we do not have the portable power source strong enough to keep it powered up to replecate on the movie. If so we would have the problems with the electric cars.
True
No. It's because we're not Tony Stark.
We have the tech for the ironman suit the only problem is it is currently huge.
@@asandax6 then tell me how TONY STARK BUILT THIS IN A CAGE WITH A BOX OF SCRAPS
The reason is simple, we aren't Tony Stark
Best reply to this video🔥🔥👌👌
If only we have a cave and a box of scraps
@@darnit1944
I'm sorry sir but I don't have a cave or a box of scraps
Alex lab...search it on UA-cam...well I guess he's tony starkovski but yeah he's literally doing this NOW.
theres no tony stark, its just a fictional character
*Studying engineering to get a good job* ❌
*Studying engineering to build an iron man suit* ✅
So what you're saying is, we could (maybe) be able to make a hulk-buster like suit a reality? Good enough for me!
The repulsors arent “reactionless forces.” As you said, he experiences recoil when its just the glove. When he has the whole suit on, the suit absorbs the energy. It has some sort of electrical actuator system that grants stark super strength, and that same system pushes back against the recoil to keep his arm stable for aiming. And i’ve heard theories that it isnt actually a pure energy/laser weapon but instead is accelerating air particles. Basically a super compact and super advanced jet engine that can either accelerate a steady stream of particles for flight or fire a short and powerful pulse for combat.
The suit as a whole is effectively just a strength-enhancing exosuit combined with a jetpack. I think it is absolutely possible to build, but the real one would be considerably bigger and bulkier than what we see in the movies
The real one would not be bigger. You are just NOT TONY STARK 😅
@@Sandeee I mean seeing as we condensed computers from massive machines that took up entire labs to tiny phones in our pockets, id say chances are a fully functioning suit exactly as portrayed in the movie is possible. Its just far beyond what we can do with current technology
ToNy sTarK wAs able To bUilD tHis in A cAVe , witH a bunCh of sacraps
You can see it when he first tests the repulsor in iron man 1. He gets flung backwards when it fires. But once he builds the suit, he no longer has to deal with the recoil
@@orange_turtle3412 the best way to replicate this energy is by using something called brown gas it's hydrogenchloride gas which can be used for both a quick repulsor flame or a quite hard repulsor blast, if you've watched @ALEX LAB then you would've seen how he's done it
Him saying ironman suit can't be made
Russian UA-camr who's making a real life iron man suit with working repulsor:I'm ironman
If it doesn’t fly is not an iron man suit
It doesn't have to fly to be an ironman suit but in the next like 20 years we might have an ironman suit that can fly
@@Flash_Fan9k as much as i love the channel of the Russian guy you are mentioning its mainly just for the gimmick and the UA-cam views… he made hydrogen hand torchs 🤷🏼♂️
@@tonyromano8337I think that is slightly understating what he has done. He made very good electrolyzer to replace the arc reactor, rockets, browns gas muscles, and repulsor. But yea, nowhere near iron man
@@anishkommireddy4429 I rewatched his new video and some of the old ones too, he was on the right track but its not as interesting anymore now its just to look cool and nice sadly…
Tony Stark was able to build this in a cave. WITH A BOX OF SCRAPMETAL.
“Well I’m sorry, I’m not Tony stark.”
0:10 i dont think thats cgi 💀💀💀
it's practical effects he's sitting behind it
@@randomPATTA-ICICLE thanks 👍
glad I want the only one thinking they just took his heart out for the movie lol
Comics using science in their writing often have to make 'creative' liberties to make things work out as they blatantly violate our known physical laws. For example, a modern tank shell is the literal culmination of a century of research, blood and sweat. They are made to even penetrate and destroy the strongest thickest armor made out of different high grade materials. Yet, Ironman's suit which has the thickness of metal sheet made out of titanium and gold (which are standard in the military industry) can stop a tank shell? Not to mention even if it could, the person inside would suffer massive internal trauma.
So yeah as much as we can make certain dreams come true, the thing we see in comics will not become true unless we break reality.
Even if there was somehow a super material to make the suit out of, that makes it un penetrable to all current weapons, someone would simply use that same material to make a bullet or weapon that can penetrate it
4:04 This bit is easy to explain away: The suit accounts for the recoil as well, and simply has systems in place to absorb the energy. It also explains the discrepancy between full suit and glove only; With just the glove, there's not enough space to install the systems needed to counteract the recoil, hence obvious recoil.
Wtf, Jarvis is like alexa or google assistant but on steroids? What the actual shit, Jarvis is much much more than that.
you know the first memory storage 5MB from 1956,
how huge it is compare what we have now.
You don't need an arc reactor to power a suit, we already have big companies with jetpacks like gravity, and also people go on their garage and make lasers that can shoot out.
You would if the suit can do the things iron man suits can do.
@@getaroundhow what about high pressure gas and a fuel cell
I do like gravity for their jetpack design and its function. But I think I would do one on my own design for thrust and flight. (Not that I’m dissing gravity tho)😅
@mikethelegendarygamer4581 yeah same, I got like 3 ideas so far
@@Keallz911high pressure gas has a high chance of a fire explosion. Fuel cells don’t produce enough energy for constant/continuous flight especially in sizes that would be required for a man sized suit yet they don’t make enough energy yet.
Arc reactor shouldn’t be needed. Yeah, it’s not gonna be unlimited flight, and it will probably die, but using Solid State Batteries would give it a decent amount of power. Would be suprised if it could fly even close to an hour, but still.
It’s not possible because it’s a miniature arc reactor in the suit that makes large amounts of self sustaining energy in real life a reactor is gigantic and it’s run by nuclear fusion nobody has made a small arc reactor like Tony did in the cave because it violates the conservation of energy law we would need years of technological advancement to do something like that
Alex labs: hold my beer
I remember reading Iron Man comics as a kid, the craziest thing I thought was that the suit is controlled cybernetically from the helmet. Does not seem so far fetched now.
Tony stark built it in a cave… with a bunch of SCRAPS
So basically, most of it is theoretical possible of not is. So we could totally have something pretty close is the far future
4:00 the reason he seems to not have recoil is because the full suit also enhances his strength, allowing him to shrug off the recoil. also it's likely a plasma blast, not a laser.
Tony stark built this in a cave with a bunch of scraps.
"well im sorry, im not Tony Stark"
And i don't understand why so many youtubers who's interested in making an IRON MAN suit isn't making the legs propultionary because he's not just depending on the arm's carrying all his bodyweight it's the feet too, that's what he uses to stabelize himself with.
no the arm are the flight stabelizer
@@Xieru *OH BULLSHIT THEY ARE NOT*, if you's think for a nanosecond that the arms are all that's carrying his ENTIRE bodyweight u are dumber than an ameba. His legs do as much heavy lifting as the arms if not twice as much.
no worries i’ll create one
How far is you're progress
@@Keallz911 "Uh, early concept stages."
@@betatester03 w, I am too, do you have something like discord where we can chat better
Give me monthly updates
The U.S. military's "Iron Man" project, the Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit (TALOS), was a program to develop a robotic exoskeleton to improve soldiers' abilities on the battlefield. The project was met with skepticism and hype, and the final product was not a comic book-style super suit. However, the program did lead to the development of several technologies that are still being used today.
Here are some of the things that were planned for the TALOS suit:
Exoskeleton: The suit would have an exoskeleton to increase the wearer's strength and endurance.
Helmet: The suit would have a helmet with a heads-up display.
Sensors: The suit would have sensors to monitor the wearer's vital signs.
Liquid armor: The suit may have used liquid armor that could transform from a liquid to a solid when an electrical current or magnetic field was applied.
Body armor: The suit would have light, impenetrable body armor.
Cameras: The suit would have cameras to provide the wearer with information about their environment.
The TALOS program was never a formal program of record, but the technology developed for the program is still being used today.
Search up Alex lab he’s making an actual iron man suit
So we could build an iron monger or hulk buster, with fins strapped to 3 nuclear reactors. Bet
too bad ALEX LAB is in the process of making one xd
Ironman suit will be possible once aliens visit us.
To me it seems like iron Man's repulsors fire something that's more like plasma instead of energy
"The iron man suit will NOT protect you from hitting the ground, ask Rhodey"
Alexa & Siri on steroids got me so good 🤣🤣🤣
Alexa in an Iron Man suit sounds like an accident waiting to happen.
A new idea: plasma. We make a loop with plasma you ignite the gas with a sparker and a battery and you tap into the plasma for electricity then feed that into the battery for charging making a loop. Then you add in the suit in the loop and the whole thing is turned into a sort of self perpetuating loop. Some problems I have come up with this problem: one the gases. Two the burnout of the battery. Three compactness and gas storage. My main thing was to see if the idea would work. Problem solving can come later. Plus added benefit we only need this part for powering the suit and we only need enough electricity to power the suit.
so idk if youve seen but it is possible the youtuber "Alex Lab" is about to finish his own suit
Is it powered by something like the arc reactor? Can it fly at super sonic speeds?
@@getaroundhow yeah actually it can
he said maybe he will do it bc hes been working for it for 6 years so ye
With the tech in the defense sectors, Iron Mans suit will be a reality in the next 10-15 years.
Not for 100 years.
Based off how the suit flies in the movies, it looks like they use some form of ionic propulsion which in real life, would require a tremendous amount of power to produce enough thrust as a jet. In the case of a suit, it would have to be a power source similar to that of an arc reactor. As of today, we don’t have the technological capabilities of making that. Most jets and rockets use liquid fuel. An iron man suit wouldn’t have any room for such “fuel”, otherwise one might as well fly a jet in place of a suit.
@@decoderhacker4062what’s ion propulsion?
@@rednaxelaproductions7560 it’s essentially a form of propulsion that accelerates positive ions to produce thrust. Existing forms are highly efficient but they don’t produce enough thrust.
@@rednaxelaproductions7560 It can't produce enough thrust. It's thrust is very minimal enough for satellites to change orbits.
Idc if It flies as long as ITS bullet proof af
Bullet proof armor is what u are looking for. Luckily it exists 😊
Well well well
mark I it is
@@anishkommireddy4429 Nah that's $hit armour, you want ACTUALLY bullet proof, you come see me. I mean actually something you can wear and jump, move and fight in that will also totally protect you from even high calibre rounds, I got the design for that
Alan you are smart for saying this because that is the point of making suits and realistic, we don't need or want all that sci fi shit flying and lasers, we want power, we want strength and durability to crush anything, we want to be invulnerable to stupid bullets from stupid guns! We want to be better than human! If you want bullet proof I'm your guy, but also my designs offer you the ability to get ran over by construction vehicles with tracks that way A LOT! Maybe even more, haven't tested, but also with superior interior protection and absorbing meaning you will not only be able to get tossed around like a rag doll even by vehicles but you'll be able to destroy anything and anyone with no effort and feel nothing at all, you can plow through anything!
The U.S. Military would love fleets of iron man suits. It's revolutionary in combat, you could easily weave around enemy planes and destroy them.
The lift thing can actually work. Everything can create lift when fast enough, and Tony can fly supersonic, so yea. Also missiles fly like that aswell without wings.
I know I am late. But an Iron Man suit is possible. We just don’t have the advanced materials yet. Stark doesn’t really share his advanced technology with the world and everything he builds is private. We also don’t have geniuses like Tony who are motivated to create a real Iron Man suit.
We do have people who are smart and motivated but they don't happen to be billionairs.
@@lorddio4280 Or they exist...but it just *don't have a narsisistic disorder* so smart bilionares just make it private.
@@lorddio4280if someone has a lot of money like Elon musk and if he wants to build an iron suit I guarantee you he can make something pretty damn close
We do... He is just trying to build a vacation home on mars
I would be able to suspend my disbelief and just say that Tony was a genius who invented a super material that can somehow break the laws of physics by being harder than steel but soft enough to absorb impacts like a pillow at the same time, except the movie told us his suit was made of gold titanium alloy, which is basically just regular metal
AI isn't a problem. AI-aided design is real and up to the task. Mechanical systems for physical strength are relatively straightforward. Flight with anything resembling a reasonable and compact/useful design.....meh....not so much right now, despite that goofy 4-jet pack thing those guys made. Power delivery. That's currently still a problem, but solutions are on the horizon, including iron-air batteries, aluminum-air batteries, graphene-based batteries (which alone would offer an exponent more capacity with drastically reduced size/weight) and even some other power-delivery methods I'm not going to speak of. In it's movie incarnation, it's not possible yet. But the hurdles are diminishing.
meanwhile alex labs - hold my beer
The repulsers recoil when he is not wearing the full suit because the full suit absorbes the energy.
Remember we can't make video games without bugs... I wouldn't trust a flying suit.... Cybernetic implants however
-_- so you would not trust a yet engine strapped to your ass. But having eyes and a hearth that can be hacked would be fine?
@Da-Butchar yep
You wouldn’t trust a flying suit but you would trust cybernetics really? 😑
@lelandholmquist2467 Yep, actually if the cybernetics were Cyberpunk level... let's just say I'd be more robot than human 😂😅
Aliens with immediate stop and start spaceships going faster than anything we have: too ez
No, this is not "why".
The way of generating or storing energy has nothing to do with the fact that any material just can't protect us from kinetic energy. Empty a mag on whatever Iron Man's helmet and the kinetic energy will just compress and splash the brain of its user. That's it, endgame. Simple physics problem.
Hacksmit made a video where he made John wicks bullet proof suit. So making the Iron man suit protect us is the only realistic thing it can do now. If we can build a bullet proof blazer. Then I think we can make a explosion proof iron man suit
@@Da-Butchar The bullets will still break your ribs if you're wearing that suit. No penetration does not equal no damage.
@@THE-X-Force sure. But thats some titli woven clothing. Imagine a metal suit
and thats assuming you can even make an impenetrable armour, his armour is only 1cm thick at best, there is no material in the world that would save him, a simple ak47 could easily shred his suit, let alone tank rounds and anti armour rounds
Honestly I'd just say do the bigger suit suggestions in the comment, thicker armor, more layers of padding, thicker layers of padding, amazing exoskeleton stuff
Though me personally? I'd just ignore defensiveness completely unless you're planning on making a straight up gundam, just focus on the mobility and protecting the user from the AR, a near human sized f-22 suit would be absolutely busted, so much smaller, harder to hit and can fit through more gaps
It's because of the power source. We haven't created one strong enough. idk how people get 9 mins out of that
Well, if in our lifetime, I believe the only possible Iron Man suits would be the Hulk Buster and Igor armors. It’s massive, can store fuel for thrusters, maybe some housing for some sort of arm repulsors and some space for weapons, high power lasers, etc.
Welp, we’re limited by the technology of our times lol
when you said "Alexa" you triggered my Alexa
For the repulsars recoil, when he has the suit it adjusts for the recoil, that is why when he just has the glove he experiences recoil since the suit is not adjusting for him.
The suit would be so brittle and easy to damage irl with how many thin layers of metal it has. Also there's the saying that goes "The more moving parts something has, the more likely it is to break", and it has hundreds of tiny moving parts in it
This video needs more views
4:08 that is Destiny 2
Remember guys they said we couldn’t build planes too
Just you wait and see, I would make an iron man suit
how does this video not have more views? Loved it ❤
Glad you enjoyed it! You can help out by sharing it with people 😅
Guys I have a theory you know in captain America the first avenger that bald dude and red skull make that laser thing with the glowing cube the tesseract powered it and made the same sound as iron man’s early repulses and since well the us captured it what if his suit is powered by a piece of the tesseract think about it
Just as the scientist trying to replicate the suit in Iron Man 1 said “The technology for it doesn’t exist yet” and then got yelled at, is how we should see all this. The technology doesn’t exist YET
6:02 this is a point that is rarely to never discussed. In Iron Man he struggled to catch a car with his suit.
But in Civil War, Tony shows Peter a clip of Spider-Man catching a similar SUV with ease.
In Avengers, the Repulsors seem to stop working. Maybe it needs atmosphere ... either somewhat ionizing the air, or something similar.
The horizontal flight is possible, but it needs to have some wings. If you look at the tomahawk cruise missile, it is mostly cylindrical with some fins on the rear, and some stub wings near the center. The tomahawk missile is much heavier than a human, weighing 2,900 lbs, but can still fly using stub wings and a speed of over 500 mph.
But since the human body isn't perfectly cylindrical, it performs less efficiently as a lifting body, but at a sufficient speed, stub wings might work to create stable horizontal flight. Another method would be to create a "webbing" between the arms and legs, like a wingsuit. That's actually exactly how the latest powered wingsuit works.
hacksmith laughs in Corner
The Ark Reactor and the Repulser has already been made and is working by Alex Lab
4:36 have a rocket or smth on the other end of your hand that only fires when you shoot your blasts to mitigate the recoil.
It’s more like a particle accelerator and that is already being used in Switzerland with cern it’s just massive
I'd say the Mjolnir armor from Halo is the more realistic thing to eventually be created if the power situation can be figured out.
The inertial dampeners on the Iron Man suit seem like the most difficult thing to create. You'd pretty much have to invent antigravity to cancel out G-forces.
I would say the power source and money is the only limitations in late 2024. I’m sure the military has probably has Ironman suits or something similar for years.
That’s why it’s called fusion
Hold my Maple syrup I've made a cardboard version of the Mark 5. One of the most underrated but most realistic
Nothing is impossible it’s says it in the word itself “Im possible “😂
3:37 i think his suit has some sort of internal cushioning that absorbs impacts
That wouldn’t help irl his organs would be crushed
Jet power suit seems more realistic than we'd be closer.to straight slapping 2 jets own our back with a heavily armored suit built around the idea
It’s possible if it’s like mark 1 or 2 the most simple of the suits he made
Just make an bigger suit lile an gundam or whatever and them when the tech is optimised began to try to srink it....
So effectively start with an Iron monger?
@@lorddio4280tbh, yeah.
Tech isn't always so efficient, and compact in its first iterations.
Look at storage on computers, we went from using massive hard disk drives to small and compact solid state drives.
We need to first start making some of these parts for the suit a reality, doesnt matter how big.
When we know for sure that those specific things are possible, we try put them into a wearable suit, also doesnt matter how big, as long as it is possible to utilise.
Then, we slowly try to shrink the tech as much as possible, whilst keeping the efficiency.
we already have something like that, its called a tank
@@lorddio4280yeah Iron monger is basically what tony started with, a very VERY (relatively) primitive, heavily protective armor with flamethrowers attached, bulky movement and just some strength boosts
Even though people might think it's impossible to build an reactor arc, or even an ionic reactor potent enough as the one of Iron Man, that's false, mainly because we have everything to build an arc reactor, but people still didn't figure out that our wastes are the answer to building an mini ionic reactor .
all i hear is "i'm incompetent and can't think of solutions for anything"
Dude, be realistic. Comic book characters aren't bound by the physical laws that reality is. They break Physics all the time; Iron Man is no exception. There are just some things that the suit can do in the movies that aren't physically feasible AT ALL. You can't, for example, accelerate yourself to absurd speeds and come to a sudden stop without destroying your body instantaneously. There's just no technology that does, or probably ever can exist, even in the distant future, that can change the velocity of an object from the high velocities seen in the movies to zero velocity, instantly, without the forces involved placing extreme stresses on that object, and in a tiny bit of space (eg, an Iron man suit's wall thickness). The impacts Tony takes in the movies would turn him to liquid, regardless of whether the suit could handle the impact.
The thing is that a big fall wouldn't break your knees cus there are
servos increasing Tony's strength
Someone has actually made a working war machine suit and has flew across the Statue of Liberty
Not even 1% of the capability of the Ironman suit
Where’s the video?
Cause the human body couldn't handle everything the suit does.... Also we haven't invented a power source for it either.
Yes we have Alex Lab made his own arc reactor
We don't have the arc reactor fuel to power the suit is the problem
8:11 fusion reactors can make more energy than used to create the energy
I bet if enough money was thrown into it they would have done a costume like that
8:32 The problem with this analysis is that many fixate on the term “reactor” but the way the arc reactor is displayed in the MCU, it has more in common with a high tech battery than an nuclear or fusion reaction.
you really just gotta understand that for all the moving plates to conflict in space, they would have to be extremely thin leaving basically no protection, if the dude wearing them could even move at all.
I think it may be possible (except the ark reactor), but on a faraway future
The real problem I see, is with the limbs ... joints: you can do it if it's not protective, but if you wanna have the joints armered, you'll probably won't move a muscle anymore.
There is no way to cheat biology / physiology.
10 Years from today:
Me: "Gemini, design me an Iron Man suit."
Gemini: "Ok."
Siri and Alexa are not close to Jarvis 💀
I'm maybe just making myself look dumb but the way people looking at iron man suit is wrong they thinking about the suit as a full suit that if want to fix the suit you need to remove parts and break it apart but it's wrong the "suit" is not a suit but parts that Tony combined which means the boots the hands the arms all have inside all that the technology and the gold and red parts are just there to hide those parts and provide an armor he built the boots and put a gold and red parts in the outside but the entire boots is pure tech not some gold and red and behind it some things that will help it fly which is why he could fit all that tech in boots because the boots are pure tech and the gold and red are just the cover
The arc reactor in his chest could have had a special cooling system (which is probably what that slimy fluid was in his chest in the first movie).
The power source... thats why!
Actually there is a person that is very close to finishing a complete iron man suit that actually works
1) Who?
2) Define "Iron Man suit". I'd define it as "Does ALL the things the suit in the movie does."
3) Define "actually works". In what way does it "actually work"?
I heard thorium can power machinery for a thousand years or even palladium. Just need to figure out the structure of the suit and how to get it to fly
ALEX LAB💀
Hacksmith: Nuh uh
Summary: Tony Stark always learns from his mistakes