Gave the worst possible scenario for a bishop to justify your point. Knights are better in closed positions but bishops are far better in open positions. The bishop pair in an open position vs knights isn't even close. The last counter point is a well positioned bishop can shut down half a knight's legal moves. It's always situational but imo bishops are better on average.
Yes, these positions are purposefully selected to show the situational power of the knight. In real games, of course both pieces have their advantages and bishops can be argued to be slightly better overall. But again, it all depends on the situation.
Exactly. Knights are generally better in middle games, Bishops in end games because they have more space. Just like Rooks by the way. Just a clickbait video.
in endgames if its 1 bishop vs 1 knight and several pawns you can put your pawns on the opposite color of the bishop but knights can move both colors so you can easily take your opponents pawns
The Knight's advantages over a bishop do not outweigh its lower overall mobility from the middlegame onward and long range potential. You are right about all of the knight's advantages. They're just not enough to compensate 2 knights for 2 opposite color bishops.
"Now I'll show you why knights are better most of the time" ??? What an utter bs statement and totally wrong. How you dare to make such a generalization and then "prove" it with only one-sided examples is beyond anyone. The only true statement is that knights are better in closed positions against bad bishops. But then you do have to win in the middle game because unfortunately for the knight, most positions open up in the endgame and then the bishop pair is almost invincible, especially when there's play on both wings.
I understand this is a joke video, but to be serious - while knights can dominate the bishops, the bishops dominate the knights more often and that's due bishop's greater mobility. The bishop is a better piece but of course depending on the position, a knight can be preferable sometimes.
I think the reason why knights are considered lower value, is because they are very bad when the position becomes more open at the endgame, so it's more benefitial to give a knight for a bishop in the middle game
This seems like kind of a joke lol, this makes it sound like the bishop is worse than a pawn. Yes in that last position thhe bishop is trapped but black has to literally put themselves in that kind of jail, and there are many situations where a bishop can completely trao a knight on an empty board
Knight may share these advantages u have mentioned in this video but it is relatively easier to block a knight than blocking a bishop. U can even block a knight with a king when its cornered. U can also block with rook. Bishop and queen can block comparatively more squares for the knight to escape. But when u have to block a bishop u need atleast 2 pieces.
Why bishops are better than knights? 1. Bishops control more squares than knights. Also they are more mobile than the knights. 2. You can checkmate your opponents with bishop pair, you can't checkmate them with knight pair. You can even checkmate your opponents with the bishop and knight pair. 3. You don't have to make a video on why bishops are better than knights. And thtas how bishops earn 0.5 points more than the knight.
Why Knight is better than bishop? 1.Bishop only control 1 square complex but knight can control both 2. Bishops only have direct control but knight have both direct as well as indirect control (Knight control more squares than a bishop(35 with 8 direct but bishops can control a maximum of 14 squares)) 3.Knights are too tactical than bishops 4.Bishops are predictable but knights are not especially in time pressure situations.Floating knights have no match even for a queen 5.Rook pawn endgame with bad bishop is draw but it's always a win with knight 6.knight is the only piece which can jump through pieces 7.Knight is the only piece in chess which can attack anything without getting attacked 8.Knight in a perfect outpost is worth more than a rook but bishops are not 9.Knight is a clear winner in closed positions 10.Knight is the best defender of a king 11.Knights are best blockader of passed pawns And many more ...
Bishops because 2 bishops work better togheter than 2 knights, and bishops are better than knight at delivering checkmate, and win pieces who king is pinned to, knights can just fork, bishops can scewer, pin&fork, therefore 1 bishop is more powerful than 1 knight unless closed position, so all what matters in pieces's power/value are only open position
I do believe that the value of the two is quite even. Bishops are better in open positions while knights are better in closed. It’s easier to force an open position and all closed positions eventually open up
Bishops are more about area control and freezing pieces because their long range helps them a lot with that which makes them a pretty good end/middle game piece. horses are more like opening pieces or for forks because no other piece can move like them. imagine if horses were more valuable than bishops and vice-versa chess would be really different
For a closed position knights are better but for open positions the bishop usually wins It is all situational but due to the long range ability, the bishop is considered a bit stronger at the top level
bruh what is this thumbnail 💀 the guy next to magnus is GM zbigniew pakleza who only plays 1.d4 for basically he's entire life, he's literally a london system spammer and you described him as 1.e4 enjoyer 💀
If you put stockfish 16 vs stockfish 16 one without the knights an the other without the bishops, it will always end in a draw no mather wich color has the pairs.
Apocalyptic weapon Abomination . . . Lord of Futile Memories . . . PURE EVIL . . . Its sole Purpose is the downfall of the world, Sol. [More of the story will be revealed in the future.]
@@macraffoul2902smothered mate only works on the same kind of people that fall for scholars mate. That is, if they are stupid enough to not push their pawns since the beginning of the game and block the king.
If the games are being played at a lower level then I’d say the knight is superior to the bishop as lower rated players do not calculate sequences further than roughly 2 moves I’d say increasing the chances of blundering a fork to the better player however once we’re out of the three digit elo range and into the not so blunder on move 5 range is where the real debate takes place, as a KID / KIA player, I do find my fianchetto bishop being useless for half of the game as it’s blocked in by my knight and or just staring at a pawn blockade while my knight is actually doing something like supporting my pawn breaks or hopping to a valuable post or rerouting to a good attacking square, however I do gotta give the bishop it’s fair share of praise as in endgame’s where the centre’s been ripped open and much more squares become available there’s more value to be found with the bishop compared to a knight as its superior mobility and ability to pin / skewer pieces become a valuable commodity. There’s great arguments for both pieces, but in my opinion I think the knights are better in the early to mid game and fall off slightly in the endgame whereas the opposite is for the bishop in which they are worse in the early to mid game but get better in endgames, honestly I gotta agree with the universal value 3 for 3 even, I can’t see either piece as superior as they’re both solid pieces which are better than the other in their own ways, positing the question which is better knight or bishop is like having a pc mother choose 1 of her 2 kids to save in a life or death scenario. There simply is no correct answer
saying one is better than the other makes no sense, if the position is open only a fool would want a knight pair and vice versa if the position is closed
the best minor piece? the pawn. people underestimate them so much they don't realize their escape squares are being blocked by a singular pawn
Gave the worst possible scenario for a bishop to justify your point. Knights are better in closed positions but bishops are far better in open positions. The bishop pair in an open position vs knights isn't even close. The last counter point is a well positioned bishop can shut down half a knight's legal moves. It's always situational but imo bishops are better on average.
Yes, these positions are purposefully selected to show the situational power of the knight. In real games, of course both pieces have their advantages and bishops can be argued to be slightly better overall. But again, it all depends on the situation.
Exactly. Knights are generally better in middle games, Bishops in end games because they have more space. Just like Rooks by the way. Just a clickbait video.
in endgames if its 1 bishop vs 1 knight and several pawns you can put your pawns on the opposite color of the bishop but knights can move both colors so you can easily take your opponents pawns
Honestly neither piece is always better than the other it always depends on the situation
Maybe I am a knight cause I often make L moves
Bishop > Knight
As some GMs say: the stronger you become in chess, the more you like bishops over knights :)
The Knight's advantages over a bishop do not outweigh its lower overall mobility from the middlegame onward and long range potential. You are right about all of the knight's advantages. They're just not enough to compensate 2 knights for 2 opposite color bishops.
"Now I'll show you why knights are better most of the time" ??? What an utter bs statement and totally wrong. How you dare to make such a generalization and then "prove" it with only one-sided examples is beyond anyone.
The only true statement is that knights are better in closed positions against bad bishops. But then you do have to win in the middle game because unfortunately for the knight, most positions open up in the endgame and then the bishop pair is almost invincible, especially when there's play on both wings.
I understand this is a joke video, but to be serious - while knights can dominate the bishops, the bishops dominate the knights more often and that's due bishop's greater mobility. The bishop is a better piece but of course depending on the position, a knight can be preferable sometimes.
I agree that one Knight definitely can be better than one Bishop, but two Bishops is always better than two Knights.
I think the reason why knights are considered lower value, is because they are very bad when the position becomes more open at the endgame, so it's more benefitial to give a knight for a bishop in the middle game
This seems like kind of a joke lol, this makes it sound like the bishop is worse than a pawn. Yes in that last position thhe bishop is trapped but black has to literally put themselves in that kind of jail, and there are many situations where a bishop can completely trao a knight on an empty board
Stockfish wins more games with bishops. Discussion closed.
sheesh 🥶🥶
im pretty sure this is referring to the average player
@@polishlithuaniainanutshell5146 Yeah but it also means the bishop is stronger, there’s context to the statement
Bro too cold for that
@@DanZhukovin what did they do then, replace all knights with bishops and vice versa?
Chigorin would've been proud.
Knight may share these advantages u have mentioned in this video but it is relatively easier to block a knight than blocking a bishop. U can even block a knight with a king when its cornered. U can also block with rook. Bishop and queen can block comparatively more squares for the knight to escape. But when u have to block a bishop u need atleast 2 pieces.
Why bishops are better than knights?
1. Bishops control more squares than knights. Also they are more mobile than the knights.
2. You can checkmate your opponents with bishop pair, you can't checkmate them with knight pair. You can even checkmate your opponents with the bishop and knight pair.
3. You don't have to make a video on why bishops are better than knights.
And thtas how bishops earn 0.5 points more than the knight.
Why Knight is better than bishop?
1.Bishop only control 1 square complex but knight can control both
2. Bishops only have direct control but knight have both direct as well as indirect control (Knight control more squares than a bishop(35 with 8 direct but bishops can control a maximum of 14 squares))
3.Knights are too tactical than bishops
4.Bishops are predictable but knights are not especially in time pressure situations.Floating knights have no match even for a queen
5.Rook pawn endgame with bad bishop is draw but it's always a win with knight
6.knight is the only piece which can jump through pieces
7.Knight is the only piece in chess which can attack anything without getting attacked
8.Knight in a perfect outpost is worth more than a rook but bishops are not
9.Knight is a clear winner in closed positions
10.Knight is the best defender of a king
11.Knights are best blockader of passed pawns
And many more ...
The pawn cuz they can turn into other pieces and shape the battle ground .
Bishops because 2 bishops work better togheter than 2 knights, and bishops are better than knight at delivering checkmate, and win pieces who king is pinned to, knights can just fork, bishops can scewer, pin&fork, therefore 1 bishop is more powerful than 1 knight unless closed position, so all what matters in pieces's power/value are only open position
I do believe that the value of the two is quite even. Bishops are better in open positions while knights are better in closed. It’s easier to force an open position and all closed positions eventually open up
It all depends on position in some positions bishop or knight is more valuable than rook
Bishops are more about area control and freezing pieces because their long range helps them a lot with that which makes them a pretty good end/middle game piece. horses are more like opening pieces or for forks because no other piece can move like them. imagine if horses were more valuable than bishops and vice-versa chess would be really different
For a closed position knights are better but for open positions the bishop usually wins
It is all situational but due to the long range ability, the bishop is considered a bit stronger at the top level
Knights are the most overrated pieces in chess while rooks are the most underrated ones
Rooks are overrated. They’re only useful in endgames and controlling open lanes
bruh what is this thumbnail 💀 the guy next to magnus is GM zbigniew pakleza who only plays 1.d4 for basically he's entire life, he's literally a london system spammer and you described him as 1.e4 enjoyer 💀
its a joke lol
knights are ultimate warriors and bishops are professional killers (the sniper)
But bishops don't really attack well, many players can see them in the corner of the board
@@DanZhukovin they're more about area control and freezing pieces. horses are more like opening pieces or for forks
KNIGHT IS BETTER THAN A BISHOP BUT IT HIGHLY DEPENDS ON POSITION .BUT BISHOP PAIR IS LEGENDARY
Stockfish wins with 2 bishops vs 2 knights case closed
Bishop
I mean they are equal because its all about the position and bishops are better in most of positions
If you put stockfish 16 vs stockfish 16 one without the knights an the other without the bishops, it will always end in a draw no mather wich color has the pairs.
Yeah because neither side has sufficient material to Checkmate (technically the one with 2 bishops can If Black defends incorrectly)
@@NoahHoi I think they mean from the starting chess position with just knight or bishops removed
@@ninja8flash742 in that case I'm pretty sure it always ends in a draw because the bots are of exact equal strength
That's Stockfish when you pair itself up.
okay okay i have an idea what if ai calculated every pieces value in game but you dont know
knights are ass without pawns
Apocalyptic weapon Abomination . . .
Lord of Futile Memories . . .
PURE EVIL . . .
Its sole Purpose is the downfall of the world, Sol.
[More of the story will be revealed in the future.]
both good
bishops are better because they can snipe at z-2763
what an informative video! mac raffoul is so good at chess! he taught me everything i know!
The knight isbetter in my opinion i like it way more (exept if the bishop moves to the sqare Z38 and people wonder why it isnt checkmate)
3:28 the Queen is toast, why say it's a smothered mate?
knight can checkmate on the next move after the rook takes
@@macraffoul2902smothered mate only works on the same kind of people that fall for scholars mate. That is, if they are stupid enough to not push their pawns since the beginning of the game and block the king.
Bishops should be worth 4 points...
Knight is better for me
another banger video thank you mac raffoul
Glad you enjoyed it
So true Mac Raffoul is only banging
If the games are being played at a lower level then I’d say the knight is superior to the bishop as lower rated players do not calculate sequences further than roughly 2 moves I’d say increasing the chances of blundering a fork to the better player however once we’re out of the three digit elo range and into the not so blunder on move 5 range is where the real debate takes place, as a KID / KIA player, I do find my fianchetto bishop being useless for half of the game as it’s blocked in by my knight and or just staring at a pawn blockade while my knight is actually doing something like supporting my pawn breaks or hopping to a valuable post or rerouting to a good attacking square, however I do gotta give the bishop it’s fair share of praise as in endgame’s where the centre’s been ripped open and much more squares become available there’s more value to be found with the bishop compared to a knight as its superior mobility and ability to pin / skewer pieces become a valuable commodity. There’s great arguments for both pieces, but in my opinion I think the knights are better in the early to mid game and fall off slightly in the endgame whereas the opposite is for the bishop in which they are worse in the early to mid game but get better in endgames, honestly I gotta agree with the universal value 3 for 3 even, I can’t see either piece as superior as they’re both solid pieces which are better than the other in their own ways, positing the question which is better knight or bishop is like having a pc mother choose 1 of her 2 kids to save in a life or death scenario. There simply is no correct answer
oh i love chess
I love Mac raffoul
image in 3:33 is ai gen :(
good vid tho
I think the knight is better because it can jump over pieces and fork. So powerful!
And can get pinned the easiest of all pieces
What kind of justification is that😂 600 elo iq
Finalmente alguém reconhecendo a força do cavalo
I love minor
Pieces
Bro edging on pdf 💀
saying one is better than the other makes no sense, if the position is open only a fool would want a knight pair and vice versa if the position is closed
i agree