This scene literally shows you him folding when he has good hands so he will throw off everyone, he's good at cards because he knows when to bet and no one can read him
Johnny knew he was gonna die. He lost so much already. He wasn't about to let Roark take away his dignity too! He'd rather go out on top & humiliating his father. The better man truly did win.
I guess it's how they'll remember you in your last moments is what'll be talked about, you wanna squeal and throw people under the bus and scream and be on your knees or take it as it is, accepting it. Like how the Joker in Dark Knight said using a knife on people for their final moments made him know people better than their loved ones knew them.
This made Rouke's guy turn on him later. They didn't trust him and found it despicable that he would murder his own son over losing to him at cards. This film is underrated.
@@RetroAdzz even the worst lowlife criminals still love their sons and I'm sure these guys were disgusted and even saddened by him killing his own son.
Hi there Tak, I've never seen this film but Rouke didn't reaalise his own actions were the ulitmate full housing himself. In that sense, Johnny WAS RIGHT. The memory of how he killed his OWN SON meant everything he did after that was poisoned, in the minds of his underlings, by how even his own offspring wasn't safe from him. As soon as he killed his own Son? He lost the game of life.
WhateverItTakes True, but knowing that you've taken away bit of a man's power, made those who were terrified of him doubt him just that little bit, and knowing they'll talk about it forever. That makes it worth it.
Brock Samson nahhh, it just showcases his limitations to do any damage. .... a board in protest of being walked on will break, or give you a sliver. But, it's still just a board.
Alot of people are on here talking about how this is “gambler’s pride,” but it really isn’t. It actually has nothing to do with the game and more so getting people to open their eyes about this evil man. Right before he got he said, “They say they wont tell, but they will!” That was him implying that people will eventually stand up to him and realize he is plain evil and has to go. He basically sacrificed himself to prove a very powerful point!
@@seewhativescenethat was JFK. Roarke is loosely based on his V.P., who had not only himself taken out w/ his mob and oil-men buddies, but even went as far as killing a son out of wedlock for “starting to talk around his 20s!”
I can agree considering I saw another comment bring up how it isn’t a “Friendly game of poker” that is Roarke as a crime boss getting his tribute, and going to his ego created a system where aside from saying he won it in poker, he gets his money in situations where he feels Lady Luck is on his side. So yeah I can see your point on him not just showing them but reminding them he’s not a man with Lady Luck on his shoulder, he’s just a man with a gun who demands everyone around him lose.
yes, and who wants to play poker with a rotten guy who doesn’t take to lose, and that explain that guy stinks at poker, all of those man had to let him win.
One thing confuses me about Roarks character. He was one of those guys that was obsessed about keeping his lineage/legacy alive. But he was unable to have any more children himself. He went out of his way to repair his sons junk after Hartigan shoot his junk off. Spending millions and turning his son into a mutant only for the chance of having grandkids. Now after his son is dead he founds out he has another healthy son. But he has nothing but disdain for him and ends up killing him himself. Basically ending his own line. It felt like it kinda didn't fit his character.
I agree, I find that weird too. Sure as pointed above, Johnny was illegitimate. But for someone going on about legacy and bloodline. You'd think he'd at-least consider accepting Johnny just for the sake of continuing his line
I think it was that Roark knew that Johnny wasn't like him at all and also could by the end of this story easily destroy him (and Johnny did destroy his untouchable reputation by besting him at Poker), so he probably thought that it wasn't worth it.
Well in Roark's eyes, he just sees a bastard son he doesn't give 2 shits about also he favored his other child more than this one. Spending so much money on him to get children.
One of the best storylines. Came from a father who valued his power more then anything . A mother who loved him but passed away suddenly. Has his fathers card tricks but is way more better then him. Even when fighting yes he passed away he still won at the final battle between him and his dad. He said the most of the last words and made a mark .
@@randybugger3006 Truly painful especially in this day and age. If you bothered to learn basic English I'd imagine it matters to you somewhat. Otherwise why bother? The entire internet at your disposal and you can't type in is "More better then him" correct?
Well yes and no. This is a very unique game of poker as in everyone there is just paying homage to Roark, hence the folding every hand even if they had great hands. The point of this poker game is not to play poker but to honor Roark. The kid got too cocky and quite frankly got what he deserved. Don't talk reckless to someone that will end your life over a comment. It was really the kids fault the entire time. The punishment was very severe and you can't change it but the kid did fuck up and had to be put in line. Roark just got humiliated infront of the people who respect him the most. Roark almost was forced to kill him or he would never be taken seriously again. You can't let some kid half your age shit on you like that and get away with it. Teach the little shit a quick lesson on respect. Too bad, he was a decent kid. Pride got that kid killed, nothing more. He easily could've walked away, even with the losses but still been alive, but the importance of standing up to Roark was worth death to him. Beautiful scene on humanity, and what hope and pride will make you do.
@@marttyd yes it’s called Sin City 2 this movie but you should definitely watch the first one Sin City by Robert Rodriguez, then watch the second one called Sin City: A Dame To Kill For - which is this video
@@PriestApostate he was a dead man the fiest time he played against him. The old man dosen't Lose, them playing against him is a way of bribe, a Show loyality. By winning against him first he was a dead man and they pulled him back to play again and die. He was supposed to Lose but he didn't, taking his Dignity. You can see how disgustrd the other players are by him. He may have killed his own son because he felt petty and you don't fuck with him...but if he is willing to do it to his son, what will he do to me? His own footman turned on him because he is to unstable, he fucked up big time.
I am reading a lot of critics about Jhonny's attitude and choice. Relax, this is all a symbolism, to show a man can be beat, no matter what, and regardless all his power, there always be a man willing to face him, take that, because that what's supose to mean
the poker thing wasnt about poker. those guys were there to pay tribute to Roark and hold their pride at the same time. thats why the always fold. the kid either didnt realize the real purpose of the game or he knew and just wanted to prove something
Sammy Garibaldo well i didnt feel the poker game was about poker. If you remember his speech to Hartigan in the first movie, he talks about power. In this movie he equates poker with power. The cards represents the dirt of each of the men at the table. It looks like you have a politician, a LT Officer, and sum drug dealers. In order to keep their place on the top of society it looks like they are all working or at the least paying to keep their status. The Poker is a front but at the same time its a fair game that anyone can jump in on at their own peril. Thats why the officer told him not to win to much cuz this aint a real game. See the kid thought he could just hustle them boys the first time. The second time it was all about pride
Chris Allen see what I don't get why bother opening the game to the public. they could've kept the game private and this whole affair could've been avoided.
IsrarTaj83 any chance to grab money and its not open for public. Its open to people that know about it. Besides the bartender gave him fair warning and he ignored her
You've got to know when to hold 'em Know when to fold 'em Know when to walk away And know when to run You never count your money When you're sittin' at the table There'll be time enough for countin' When the dealin's done
Nancy going emo and killing Roark was an original too. But that one was horrible. Ruined the character of Nancy, was pretty cringey, made absolutely no sense timeline wise as Marv was still alive. And they got Bruce Willis back for literally 60 seconds of screen time and had to pay him a few million.
Good? He wins, he gets punished, he’s best idea is to come back to win again and gets punished to death. What was the title again? “Plans are overrated?” “Being a moron doesn’t pay off?” “ “That’s why smart people are usually good at chess?”
@@The_Patbey Hey man I have a girlfriend, 64gb of Ram on my computer, Ryzen 9, a badass fullframe camera, fashion & bling from neck to toe, so he'd be well in his right to be jealous of me
@@The_Patbey so you're not disagreeing with my point you're just saying I shouldn't have been allowed to make my true point in the first place? Interesting.. similar to a criminal saying "Yes this proves I'm guilty, but it was taken in illegal search so therefore I'm innocent"
Rourke made no sense. This son was smart, lucky, and decent looking. His other son was a complete loser. Killed his own actually decent son, while spending millions to save the creeper that went nowhere.
A dame to kill for was the most decent one, since it was the only story that came from the comics. You could feel the same vibes and atmosphere than in the first movie.
Sorry, I always thought this was stupid. Johnny supposedly "wins" by proving he was a better player. Oh please! _Everybody already knew_ Roarke ddidn't win all the time because he's the best player; he always won because he had power, wasn't afraid of using it, and everyone else was afraid of him. So nobody dared to beat him. They knew it. He knew it. _Everyone_ knew it. His winning was never about being the best, it was about rubbing everyone else's nose in the fact that they were weaker and he _didn't need_ skill to beat them. So Johnny didn't prove a damn thing, and he threw his life away not proving it. In fact, I would argue that all he did was reinforce Roarke's power, because they all knew what would happen if anybody dared to beat Roarke, and all Johnny did was remove any last lingering shred of doubt that that was a bluff.
I think the point was that unlike anyone playing against roak. Johnny had the balls to to play and beat him and wasn't intimidated by the power he had or afraid of the result if he did beat him. So ultimately it was the one who had the last laugh type of ordeal. Going out by at least having your enemy be caught with their pants down type of situations. But that's just my perspective of it all.
Not criticizing the performances here, but this is an example of how I felt this movie was a little too bleak... pointlessly bleak. We're raging over a poker game and all this "Johnny won in the end" jibbah jabbah is really just a blip on the radar in the crazy Sin City world. Also this particular story was created specifically for the second film and for the sole purpose to overly antagonize Roark so we can get some "satisfaction" in his demise towards the end in another story made for the film, I guess.
All these silly two shoes comments about how supposedly he was the "better man" and the "real winner" in this. But imagine dying over a game of cards (esp. since he must've known that the other guy practically had the power to kill him). Also, at this rate he might've straight up tried to kill the guy if he was feeling suicidal instead of trying to "beat" him in some bullshit card game.
I always loved this scene. But realistically what's the point of playing against someone that will inevitably win every time? No one would bother to play against him.
saying "if i could give any young man advice it'd be this: wear a rubber" before shooting your illegitimate son in the head is one of the coldest, most evil things someone could ever do. Senator Roarke is a great villain
I really wanted to like the movie. I love dark comics and the brilliant imaginations out there. However there was something not quite right with Dime for a Dame. It felt like a really nice flavoured bubble-gum but the taste on the tongue was short-lived. Sin City? Well, that is is whole different packet of gum!
See, the problem why this failed and the OG Sin City worked was the protagonists in the original were kind of insane assholes. But the villains were even worse somehow. Really laid down that no hope feeling. This guy is like an anime protagonist
Plus, Johnny says he's "better" than Rourke when all he does in order to win is draw the nuts each time. That's not really being a good player, it's just being a lucky asshole.
2:39 soundtrack from M Night Shyamalan's The Village begins here. Not noticed it before. That shimmering violin. Comes from the scene when Joachim Phoenix grabs Bryce Dallas Howard from the porch and leads her inside to safety.
Usually with the bad people everyone leaves and abandons them, they die completely isolated and no one gives a fuck when they die. Roark probably never felt love from anyone in his entire life and would die with no one to grieve him.
Scene was almost ruined by Levitt explaining the importance of him winning the card game. To on the nose. At best, its lazy. That said, this was the best scene in the movie
I don't think people grasped the power dynamics and the true meaning of this scene. Johnny didn't win, there's no winning in his final crusade to fight against Roark. Roark screwed his mother, killed his newly met blonde, broke his hand, he destroyed and humiliated everything Johnny loved or cared about, yet he fought back with defiance. Instead of accepting defeat, Johnny went through extreme humiliation to play the game with only one hand, yet his victory backfired at him. Notice when Johnny made his monologue he gave a flicker of grin, but quickly disappeared as Roark stood up and pulled out a gun. Roark shot him and tossed him out like he was just a minor inconvenience. Johnny's defiance and victory is completely shattered useless as Roark is playing a far more vicious game, a game with power. It doesn't matter how skilled you are or how smart you are, the man with power will always triumph in the sin city. Just like in real life
In movies being good at cards means you just always draw incredible hands.
@It's George, Man jojo,
@It's George, Man Watch more poker movies
This scene literally shows you him folding when he has good hands so he will throw off everyone, he's good at cards because he knows when to bet and no one can read him
Lol yeah
@It's George, Man Watch Rounders.
He may have paid with his life, but Johnny won in two ways: Being a better player than his father and being a better person than his father.
What's the name of the movie
being a better corpse
@@redblueyellow2552 sin city 2
He was dead. He didn’t win much.
@@NuevoExistence Why the fuck can't he just screw his father and live his life with all those money lol
Johnny knew he was gonna die. He lost so much already. He wasn't about to let Roark take away his dignity too! He'd rather go out on top & humiliating his father. The better man truly did win.
Transformersguy On The Hunt Class and dignity you can take to the grave, money you can't.
Dead is dead, you don't take shit with you.
Transformersguy On The Hunt you can live with dignity you can’t die with it.
I guess it's how they'll remember you in your last moments is what'll be talked about, you wanna squeal and throw people under the bus and scream and be on your knees or take it as it is, accepting it. Like how the Joker in Dark Knight said using a knife on people for their final moments made him know people better than their loved ones knew them.
@@HereticDuo exactly.
This made Rouke's guy turn on him later. They didn't trust him and found it despicable that he would murder his own son over losing to him at cards.
This film is underrated.
I like the way, at the end, they all looked shocked and sorry for his son
@@RetroAdzz even the worst lowlife criminals still love their sons and I'm sure these guys were disgusted and even saddened by him killing his own son.
@@flightofthebumblebee9529 he didn't feel bad about killing his own son (the good one) but he went mad when Hartigan killed junior (who was a rapist).
No one turned on him you potato.
ended up coasting his life cause he had less protection in the end
"She was an angel" favorite quote
Then" Say Hello To Ur Mama She Always was A Stupid Bitch..."
Hahahahah
Born a loser, died a Winner I admire that.
i liked your quote
Who did he died?
Hi there Tak, I've never seen this film but Rouke didn't reaalise his own actions were the ulitmate full housing himself.
In that sense, Johnny WAS RIGHT.
The memory of how he killed his OWN SON meant everything he did after that was poisoned, in the minds of his underlings, by how even his own offspring wasn't safe from him.
As soon as he killed his own Son? He lost the game of life.
he died a loser too, he lost his life and an innocent girls life in mare 2 nights.
EVEN IN DEATH, HE STILL WON.
Nonsense. He had his hollywood moment and now he's worm dessert. A little speech isn't worth your life.
WhateverItTakes True, but knowing that you've taken away bit of a man's power, made those who were terrified of him doubt him just that little bit, and knowing they'll talk about it forever. That makes it worth it.
Brock Samson nahhh, it just showcases his limitations to do any damage.
.... a board in protest of being walked on will break, or give you a sliver. But, it's still just a board.
Fuck off Justin Trudeau.
@@uppercutgrandma4425 I don't quit get what you mean? can you please explain your metaphor a little bit?
Alot of people are on here talking about how this is “gambler’s pride,” but it really isn’t. It actually has nothing to do with the game and more so getting people to open their eyes about this evil man. Right before he got he said, “They say they wont tell, but they will!” That was him implying that people will eventually stand up to him and realize he is plain evil and has to go. He basically sacrificed himself to prove a very powerful point!
🪦⚰️💐Cool story sis, they can put that on your tombstone when you sacrifice yourself over something this ridiculous
@@seewhativescene you can't see the bigger picture
@@210raab clearly not, but he does prove a valid point to say the least about those kinds of people!
@@seewhativescenethat was JFK. Roarke is loosely based on his V.P., who had not only himself taken out w/ his mob and oil-men buddies, but even went as far as killing a son out of wedlock for “starting to talk around his 20s!”
I can agree considering I saw another comment bring up how it isn’t a “Friendly game of poker” that is Roarke as a crime boss getting his tribute, and going to his ego created a system where aside from saying he won it in poker, he gets his money in situations where he feels Lady Luck is on his side.
So yeah I can see your point on him not just showing them but reminding them he’s not a man with Lady Luck on his shoulder, he’s just a man with a gun who demands everyone around him lose.
Killing his own son made his men realize “if he doesn’t care about his own son then he for damn sure doesn’t care about us.”
yes, and who wants to play poker with a rotten guy who doesn’t take to lose, and that explain that guy stinks at poker, all of those man had to let him win.
@@ignaciogodoy7095 facts.
Yea boii
One thing confuses me about Roarks character.
He was one of those guys that was obsessed about keeping his lineage/legacy alive. But he was unable to have any more children himself.
He went out of his way to repair his sons junk after Hartigan shoot his junk off. Spending millions and turning his son into a mutant only for the chance of having grandkids.
Now after his son is dead he founds out he has another healthy son. But he has nothing but disdain for him and ends up killing him himself. Basically ending his own line.
It felt like it kinda didn't fit his character.
Lazereye57 exactly
I agree, I find that weird too. Sure as pointed above, Johnny was illegitimate. But for someone going on about legacy and bloodline.
You'd think he'd at-least consider accepting Johnny just for the sake of continuing his line
I think it was that Roark knew that Johnny wasn't like him at all and also could by the end of this story easily destroy him (and Johnny did destroy his untouchable reputation by besting him at Poker), so he probably thought that it wasn't worth it.
Well in Roark's eyes, he just sees a bastard son he doesn't give 2 shits about also he favored his other child more than this one. Spending so much money on him to get children.
Exactly, one of the biggest reasons why Juniors death was such a loss to him was because his blood line was cut.
One of the best storylines. Came from a father who valued his power more then anything . A mother who loved him but passed away suddenly. Has his fathers card tricks but is way more better then him. Even when fighting yes he passed away he still won at the final battle between him and his dad. He said the most of the last words and made a mark .
Your abuse of grammar just broke my brain.
@@randybugger3006 Truly painful especially in this day and age. If you bothered to learn basic English I'd imagine it matters to you somewhat. Otherwise why bother? The entire internet at your disposal and you can't type in is "More better then him" correct?
Don't you just hate it when someone's being a sore loser after he shot the poor kid? That was totally uncalled for.
Well yes and no. This is a very unique game of poker as in everyone there is just paying homage to Roark, hence the folding every hand even if they had great hands. The point of this poker game is not to play poker but to honor Roark. The kid got too cocky and quite frankly got what he deserved. Don't talk reckless to someone that will end your life over a comment. It was really the kids fault the entire time. The punishment was very severe and you can't change it but the kid did fuck up and had to be put in line. Roark just got humiliated infront of the people who respect him the most. Roark almost was forced to kill him or he would never be taken seriously again. You can't let some kid half your age shit on you like that and get away with it. Teach the little shit a quick lesson on respect. Too bad, he was a decent kid. Pride got that kid killed, nothing more. He easily could've walked away, even with the losses but still been alive, but the importance of standing up to Roark was worth death to him. Beautiful scene on humanity, and what hope and pride will make you do.
@@LEXeroma Except Johnny had the right to humiliate Roark after everything he did.
@@LEXeroma "he got what he deserved" is a bit of an overstatement. Also, that "kid" was his son
@@LEXeroma So many words, yet such little understanding of this scene. How do you manage that?
@@MasterOfKnowledge. Hey Master Chief, go read Art of War for the first time or something. Ehhh S'didn't get the point... /r/whoooosh
“ I am ambidextrous” hardest come back of all time
I’d give my right arm to be ambidextrous. What movie is this?
Sin city? Is it a movie?
@@marttyd yes it’s called Sin City 2 this movie but you should definitely watch the first one Sin City by Robert Rodriguez, then watch the second one called Sin City: A Dame To Kill For - which is this video
Why give someone bad advice? Sin city is where it ended, not this bootleg sequel @@RobsRILife
@@marttyd watch the classic Sin City under the impression the sequel is meaningless garbage waste of time
The whole movie should've been around Johnny
Instead, they used the same characters to do the same thing
Kyle Campbell But it wouldn't be Sin City because Johnny wasn't in the comics. But yes he did an amazing job.
Blu Jai what’s a comic have to do with this? It’s a movie
@@justthisguy1948 something called an "adaptation"
@I drink your milkshake yea it’s based on a comic book that means you can leave in or take out whatever you want
@@paulbeen459 no it simply means they are using the characters you can do whatever you want when making a movie
Johnny: the only Roark that wasn't an asshole and morally bankrupt.
Johnny knew that he was about to die so he preffered to win against roark because he wanted to humiliate roark in front of everyone because he dies.
Why was he about to die?
@@PriestApostate he was a dead man the fiest time he played against him. The old man dosen't Lose, them playing against him is a way of bribe, a Show loyality. By winning against him first he was a dead man and they pulled him back to play again and die. He was supposed to Lose but he didn't, taking his Dignity. You can see how disgustrd the other players are by him. He may have killed his own son because he felt petty and you don't fuck with him...but if he is willing to do it to his son, what will he do to me? His own footman turned on him because he is to unstable, he fucked up big time.
@@PriestApostate He pissed off Rouke earlier, hence why his hand is broken and his face bruised.
Powers Boothe is a damn good actor. I love that last line of his
was. may he rest in peace. he was perfect for this character.
Great talent.
Very underrated.
I am reading a lot of critics about Jhonny's attitude and choice. Relax, this is all a symbolism, to show a man can be beat, no matter what, and regardless all his power, there always be a man willing to face him, take that, because that what's supose to mean
I like how the title implies that this is in fact how the real Joseph Gordon-Levitt died IRL lol
yeah thats what I thought
This was the best storyline in Sincity 2.
Which says a lot about how shitty it was, and I’m not even comparing this to the masterpiece the first one was
It's strange....I've seen people get goofy when they lost....but 99% are talkers only. It's that 1% you have to watch out for.
Listening to talkers makes me thirsty...and hungry
@@danoregano4260Game of thrones 😂
Someone's a sore looser
That's what I said too. :)
blacky
Its not a shoelace lol
Man like Mike loser*
Your father
I didn't know. Rest in peace Gordon
Damn…I had no idea he was such a great card player. Loved him in 500 Days of Summer.
Can’t believe he’s gone, R.I.P.
Hoping this is a joke
@@mrpowers4667No, he's serious, 100% honest and true.
@@mrpowers4667 Read the title to this video.
If he and nacy teamed up the outcome would have been different
Take the mask off
He would literally have to kill everyone in that room in order to have a good night sleep
Yeah! WTF
the poker thing wasnt about poker. those guys were there to pay tribute to Roark and hold their pride at the same time. thats why the always fold. the kid either didnt realize the real purpose of the game or he knew and just wanted to prove something
Chris Allen what do you mean
Sammy Garibaldo well i didnt feel the poker game was about poker. If you remember his speech to Hartigan in the first movie, he talks about power. In this movie he equates poker with power. The cards represents the dirt of each of the men at the table. It looks like you have a politician, a LT Officer, and sum drug dealers. In order to keep their place on the top of society it looks like they are all working or at the least paying to keep their status. The Poker is a front but at the same time its a fair game that anyone can jump in on at their own peril. Thats why the officer told him not to win to much cuz this aint a real game. See the kid thought he could just hustle them boys the first time. The second time it was all about pride
Chris Allen oh ok thanks
Chris Allen see what I don't get why bother opening the game to the public. they could've kept the game private and this whole affair could've been avoided.
IsrarTaj83 any chance to grab money and its not open for public. Its open to people that know about it. Besides the bartender gave him fair warning and he ignored her
Holy shit he killed his own son…
what a good human he is
I wish Rourke kept the mustache.
You've got to know when to hold 'em
Know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away
And know when to run
You never count your money
When you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin'
When the dealin's done
… and know when to not get shot in the head. That’s an important one.
@@tonykinskywalker1100 "know when to run"
🃏I'm glad Kenny Rogers is ded
Probably the only good "short" story in the movie, and it was like the only one not based off the comics
Nancy going emo and killing Roark was an original too. But that one was horrible. Ruined the character of Nancy, was pretty cringey, made absolutely no sense timeline wise as Marv was still alive. And they got Bruce Willis back for literally 60 seconds of screen time and had to pay him a few million.
@@durrclips746 that is a great deal for Bruce Willis!
Good? He wins, he gets punished, he’s best idea is to come back to win again and gets punished to death. What was the title again? “Plans are overrated?” “Being a moron doesn’t pay off?” “ “That’s why smart people are usually good at chess?”
@@durrclips746 Marv's Goldie story didn't happen until after this story I think.
Damn man, imagine calling your own son trash right after you kill him.
Who's idea was it to rescore it with tracks from 300 and the Village?!
jealous?
@@mogmaximus why would he be jealous? That makes literally no sense
@@The_Patbey Hey man I have a girlfriend, 64gb of Ram on my computer, Ryzen 9, a badass fullframe camera, fashion & bling from neck to toe, so he'd be well in his right to be jealous of me
@@mogmaximus ok
@@The_Patbey so you're not disagreeing with my point you're just saying I shouldn't have been allowed to make my true point in the first place? Interesting.. similar to a criminal saying "Yes this proves I'm guilty, but it was taken in illegal search so therefore I'm innocent"
"I Beat You, Forever..."
Rourke made no sense. This son was smart, lucky, and decent looking. His other son was a complete loser. Killed his own actually decent son, while spending millions to save the creeper that went nowhere.
What's this movie called
@@Leoligaur Sin City!
@@azrielimaginations damn I just watched this movie and didn't see this scene but that's what I thought the movie was😂
@@Leoligaur ohhh right this is the second one.....
The soundtrack in this clip is "those we don't speak of" - The Village
Is the soundtrack actually used in this movie too?
Even KGB could take a loss like a man.
*When that card turning that was epic*
2:41 “I didn’t know you were good at maths either Boycie” 😳
best poker move or all time :D
@@nikolastarcevic1761 “that wasn’t the hand I dealt you 😉”
@@lgx3557 i knew you had something up your sleeve Del!
@Chpsy Tits yep del boy vs boycie :D
The best story out of the sequel.
A dame to kill for was the most decent one, since it was the only story that came from the comics. You could feel the same vibes and atmosphere than in the first movie.
I just noticed in the first hand they both had the 10 of clubs.
"At the end of the days...the one who have a gun on its hands always wins"
The most dangerous villain is the one who doesn’t use a gun to get what he wants.
I love both of these movies so much.
He never lose.
Sorry, I always thought this was stupid. Johnny supposedly "wins" by proving he was a better player. Oh please! _Everybody already knew_ Roarke ddidn't win all the time because he's the best player; he always won because he had power, wasn't afraid of using it, and everyone else was afraid of him. So nobody dared to beat him. They knew it. He knew it. _Everyone_ knew it. His winning was never about being the best, it was about rubbing everyone else's nose in the fact that they were weaker and he _didn't need_ skill to beat them. So Johnny didn't prove a damn thing, and he threw his life away not proving it. In fact, I would argue that all he did was reinforce Roarke's power, because they all knew what would happen if anybody dared to beat Roarke, and all Johnny did was remove any last lingering shred of doubt that that was a bluff.
DAMN.....I'm glad SOMEONE fucking said it... stupid and useless waste of an otherwise cool character...
He couldn't handle the yo mama jokes and went all out.
Totally agree, no sense in tickling the dragon, play stupid games win stupid prizes.
why does anyone play with him to begin with?
I think the point was that unlike anyone playing against roak. Johnny had the balls to to play and beat him and wasn't intimidated by the power he had or afraid of the result if he did beat him. So ultimately it was the one who had the last laugh type of ordeal. Going out by at least having your enemy be caught with their pants down type of situations. But that's just my perspective of it all.
Not criticizing the performances here, but this is an example of how I felt this movie was a little too bleak... pointlessly bleak. We're raging over a poker game and all this "Johnny won in the end" jibbah jabbah is really just a blip on the radar in the crazy Sin City world. Also this particular story was created specifically for the second film and for the sole purpose to overly antagonize Roark so we can get some "satisfaction" in his demise towards the end in another story made for the film, I guess.
Joseph Gordon-Levitt underrated, which is a good thing.
Playing with Roark is amazing! If you win, you'll get death
He should have just left the city and lived his life.
This story was great, it was about a dude that all he wanted was to get a good shot in, even if it meant his life
This was a legendary scene and death. If you think otherwise you have not understood it properly
He knew he was dying. He used his death as a scyte to his father neck.
The move was brilliant in a way.
All these silly two shoes comments about how supposedly he was the "better man" and the "real winner" in this.
But imagine dying over a game of cards (esp. since he must've known that the other guy practically had the power to kill him).
Also, at this rate he might've straight up tried to kill the guy if he was feeling suicidal instead of trying to "beat" him in some bullshit card game.
I just noticed the 666s and king card. Around 1:04
Pretty neat symbolism!
Subliminal messages maybe?
@@fakenut6180
So here's my interpretation.
The 666 symbolizes how evil Roarke's character is.
The King is pretty simple.
He's the King Of Sin City.
As a great man once said; “…. Who the FUCK IS THAT GUY!”
Lol
I always loved this scene. But realistically what's the point of playing against someone that will inevitably win every time?
No one would bother to play against him.
It's a bribe and a sighn of Submission. "I follow you so you don't have to worry about me"
saying "if i could give any young man advice it'd be this: wear a rubber" before shooting your illegitimate son in the head is one of the coldest, most evil things someone could ever do. Senator Roarke is a great villain
Hello
Thank you all for your support and love I really appreciate for your comments and likes
I like how he though the cards down on the table I got chills every time I watch🥶🥶this scene
The eagle view outsmarted the one who accually never got elected to Congress
"You can help your delicate sensibilities by turning the fuck away!"
Them 2 robbed my joint! And that's where they're gonna be dealt with!
I only just noticed, but the music in the background at around 2:20 is from The Village.
Four aces and one eight...not quite the typical Dead Man's Hand, but close enough.
I really wanted to like the movie. I love dark comics and the brilliant imaginations out there. However there was something not quite right with Dime for a Dame. It felt like a really nice flavoured bubble-gum but the taste on the tongue was short-lived. Sin City? Well, that is is whole different packet of gum!
See, the problem why this failed and the OG Sin City worked was the protagonists in the original were kind of insane assholes. But the villains were even worse somehow. Really laid down that no hope feeling. This guy is like an anime protagonist
1:29 I know the whole movie is pretty much CGI, but did they really need to CGI the cards?
CGI is the future
Madness ? THIS IS SIN CITY !
I always fall asleep trying to watch this movie.
I really didn't like this story. Doesn't attract many people to your table if the winning hand earns you a lead migraine.
Plus, Johnny says he's "better" than Rourke when all he does in order to win is draw the nuts each time. That's not really being a good player, it's just being a lucky asshole.
Story of my life!
someone lost .... his life
He didn’t live an honest life, but at least he could die with pride.
2:39 soundtrack from M Night Shyamalan's The Village begins here. Not noticed it before. That shimmering violin. Comes from the scene when Joachim Phoenix grabs Bryce Dallas Howard from the porch and leads her inside to safety.
🃏♠️♣️♥️♦️ “I beat you, Forever!”
"Hey, you hear Roark lost cards to some guy?"
"Oh.....neat I guess...."
Everyone at the table after the shooting:
"Same time next week?"
*R.I.P. Powers Boothe*
Such a good actor
got to love those cgi cards, they couldn't just get a guy to slide real ones across the table for that shot
Now they all know what happens when you do - a perfect comeback, even when Roark was defeated. Can't say that defeat mattered really anyway.
Recognize James Newton Howard's score from The Village there.
Moral of this story is that bad people always win.
The good die young and so it continues.
Usually with the bad people everyone leaves and abandons them, they die completely isolated and no one gives a fuck when they die. Roark probably never felt love from anyone in his entire life and would die with no one to grieve him.
Only in this film, though
there are no good people
He folded Jack's full !!!! What!!!!!
10s full
My bad
That boy if he is risky that is why he sought his death
Scene was almost ruined by Levitt explaining the importance of him winning the card game. To on the nose. At best, its lazy.
That said, this was the best scene in the movie
3:33 Don’t be a fool wrap your tool.
Very poetic. I would have thrown a grenade in the damn room...on the table....if i were a graphic novel character.
The other guys are just gonna stay and keep losing? Or try to win and get killed? Weird
This is a movie that stuck with me after watching it !!
Same man....
Does it bug anyone else that they reused the soundtrack from The Village?
Myles Coyne i never noticed that lol
I Like how you added a soundtrack from the village.
Moral Victory ✌️
"Take out that trash, let's get back to the game" lol my man 😄
Powers Boothe just oozed villainy- must have been the eyebrows idk
Interesting choice of music..The Village 😎
The village soundtrack is playing behind the drama here haha, shit just realised..
I've played ALOT of poker, but l've never seen a 4 of a kind or a royal straight flush; and only one or two straight flushes.
MR. Gordon Levitt he is the ``poker winner`` and also very very funny person in this Sin City movie 😅😅😅
People saying Johnny won in his death are sure losers in real life. Wear a rubber guys.
I don't think people grasped the power dynamics and the true meaning of this scene. Johnny didn't win, there's no winning in his final crusade to fight against Roark. Roark screwed his mother, killed his newly met blonde, broke his hand, he destroyed and humiliated everything Johnny loved or cared about, yet he fought back with defiance. Instead of accepting defeat, Johnny went through extreme humiliation to play the game with only one hand, yet his victory backfired at him. Notice when Johnny made his monologue he gave a flicker of grin, but quickly disappeared as Roark stood up and pulled out a gun. Roark shot him and tossed him out like he was just a minor inconvenience. Johnny's defiance and victory is completely shattered useless as Roark is playing a far more vicious game, a game with power. It doesn't matter how skilled you are or how smart you are, the man with power will always triumph in the sin city. Just like in real life
ooooh poor little bald baby, his ego got hurt
The music you added gets mixed with the movie music and sounds horrible.
Met Powers Boothe in 2000 and he was a cool guy.