Russia's 6th Generation Fighter Jet Is a MYTH, Here's Why

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 806

  • @daiakunin
    @daiakunin 12 днів тому +122

    Wes you just don't understand. This 6th gen Russian fighter, codenamed чушь собачья, will be the greatest plane in the history of aviation. It'll be able to fly at mach 69, fire missiles, lasers, and railguns simultaneously, transform into a submarine for underwater operations, and transform into a rocket for orbital operations. It'll truly be a game changer.

    • @DunedinMultimedia2
      @DunedinMultimedia2 12 днів тому +27

      It will be invisible like Wonder Woman's plane!

    • @lobsterbisque7567
      @lobsterbisque7567 12 днів тому +14

      🤣🤣🤣And capable of vertical take off as well!

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 12 днів тому +10

      Xbox or Nintendo?

    • @ohyeahwhat5387
      @ohyeahwhat5387 12 днів тому +2

      I like the name translation.

    • @Ruslan.Demidov
      @Ruslan.Demidov 12 днів тому

      будет война с русскими на территории Британии и США не обосрись. ))) мы всё запомним.

  • @EdgyNumber1
    @EdgyNumber1 8 днів тому +22

    THE VERY FACT that the engines are exposed and have a smoking problem helps give some of the game away.... Literally.

  • @sigis72
    @sigis72 13 днів тому +167

    "For some reason" none of russias most hyped equipment is sent anywhere near combat and anything that went into combat has underperformed, sometimes by a lot

    • @inso80
      @inso80 12 днів тому +3

      Not sure if it's because they need to test it first or produce it.

    • @inso80
      @inso80 12 днів тому +11

      They are probably failing at both.

    • @sigis72
      @sigis72 12 днів тому

      @@inso80 it’s because it’s all shit, smoke and mirrors. The entire culture is based on lying, stealing and every man for himself

    • @MacedonianChristian
      @MacedonianChristian 12 днів тому +12

      su 57 has shown its capabilities of stealth, it has reportedly been operating in ukraine for 3 years now with 0 shot down

    • @FoundSolace
      @FoundSolace 12 днів тому +9

      They haven’t been shot down because they haven’t actually been in Ukraine for more than a couple weeks, in the beginning of the war they implemented them temporarily then pulled them out when they realized Ukraine isn’t going to let them win lmao

  • @mykec2007
    @mykec2007 13 днів тому +116

    SU-57 "Air Show" T-14 Armata MPT (Main Parade Tank)

  • @jeffreyexposito3803
    @jeffreyexposito3803 13 днів тому +53

    The Indian government figured out that the SU 57 was no more than a 4th generation fighter disguised as a 5th gen combat aircraft back in 2014. after close inspection leading to withdrawal from the project soon thereafter

    • @tedarcher9120
      @tedarcher9120 12 днів тому

      It would be fine if It didn't cost as much as f-35

    • @Gr8putin
      @Gr8putin 11 днів тому +5

      But as Indian I can tell you we will buy it soon. It’s engines are now matured enough . Rcs is just one of the characteristics of 5th gen aircraft of course it doesn’t excel in that yard stick . It’s more then enough to face Chinese j20

    • @tedarcher9120
      @tedarcher9120 11 днів тому +2

      @Gr8putin no it's not. J-20 has missiles with three times the range

    • @Gr8putin
      @Gr8putin 11 днів тому

      @ Russia do have long range missiles and India too developing Astra 3 . We would trust Russian hardware over Chinese any day

    • @tedarcher9120
      @tedarcher9120 11 днів тому +4

      @Gr8putin Russia does, but it doesn't export it. Astra-3 can't be mounted to su-57. It would require a huge modification

  • @wildweasel3001
    @wildweasel3001 13 днів тому +89

    Sputnik was cool, down hill since then! Don't discourage them though, I want to see a 6th gen fighter constructed with rivets and powered by stolen washing machines 😂

    • @gaius_enceladus
      @gaius_enceladus 12 днів тому +8

      @wildweasel3001 - Yep! "Don't make me use my spin-cycle! You won't like my spin-cycle!"

    • @kdrapertrucker
      @kdrapertrucker 12 днів тому +4

      South k was a basketball sized sphere with a simple radio transmitter transmitting beeps, it did absolutely nothing other then beep at every country it passed over. Just meant to been seen, while U.Sm satellites had scientific instruments.

    • @rocketman1058
      @rocketman1058 11 днів тому +2

      russians can steal all about 6th gen, but they won't be able to produce anything but the rivets

    • @AtlantiansGaming
      @AtlantiansGaming 10 днів тому

      Sputnik is as a radio that beeped.
      That is it.
      The US satellite was a full year ahead of the Soviets so the Soviets launched a useless radio into orbit to circle around and beep… just so they could claim they had the first satellite!
      The first US Satellite actually did useful stuff.

    • @sujitbala1492
      @sujitbala1492 10 днів тому

      russia is so bad they are holding off a country backed by 3 countries

  • @user-otzlixr
    @user-otzlixr 12 днів тому +20

    They have done a pretty good convincing the world these weapons are real.

    • @rikk319
      @rikk319 7 днів тому +2

      That's because a whole shit-ton of people in the world lack the ability to be skeptical of bullshit.

    • @user-otzlixr
      @user-otzlixr 7 днів тому +1

      @ Hard to argue with that, they know their audience.

    • @crowdpleaser1036
      @crowdpleaser1036 6 днів тому

      Not me I'm afraid!!!😂

    • @marsMayflower
      @marsMayflower 6 днів тому

      Most in the world lack critical thinking skills

    • @bloodlustshiva1
      @bloodlustshiva1 6 днів тому

      If they had I'd say more countries would be ordering from them.

  • @goldenageofdinosaurs7192
    @goldenageofdinosaurs7192 13 днів тому +84

    Hell, if they’re gonna just make shit up, they might as well talk about their upcoming ‘7th generation’ fighter🤦‍♂️
    They can’t even design & develop a 5th generation fighter, much less a 6th.

    • @SCH292
      @SCH292 13 днів тому +8

      That's what make their 7th gen so special. It's so cool and special it skip 5 and 6 to 7! 🤣

    • @noodleincup
      @noodleincup 13 днів тому

      They dont need any generation, they have an ultimate soggy nut of their warleader xD

    • @Ruslan.Demidov
      @Ruslan.Demidov 12 днів тому

      а ты бы хотел получить пулю в лоб?

    • @mikejfranklin7000
      @mikejfranklin7000 12 днів тому +2

      Or 12th generation😂

    • @SoloRenegade
      @SoloRenegade 11 днів тому +3

      they couldn't even deliver fourth gen fighters to Iran pre-assembled.

  • @TheNefastor
    @TheNefastor 11 днів тому +6

    Log doesn't complicate math, or we wouldn't use them. Log turns multiplications into additions, simplifying a lot of maths. That's how log rulers and log tables could be used as calculators. Glad to hear a youtuber talking decibels.

  • @silkplayer9
    @silkplayer9 13 днів тому +56

    Insider story time: i have several relatives who serve in viet nam’s people airforce, they all say not only the craftsmanships of mig and sukhoi are horrible the myth of “soviet reliable and dependable” is completely bs. Although the performance is “good enough” with means barely fly able you have to constantly maintain and repair it with little fly time, reliability is super low error and malfunction are guaranteed, engine lifespan is short.

    • @thorstenguenther
      @thorstenguenther 12 днів тому +6

      The Vietnamese government should try acquire the SAAB Gripen. While not on par with US aircraft, it it said to be excellent value for money and should be sufficient to deter China's ambitions. Don't know whether this is politically possible, though.

    • @kentstructures4388
      @kentstructures4388 12 днів тому +5

      Yeah, ;-) that's why US airforce never gained air superiority over north vietnam.. And that's why US planes fall from the sky in every mission.. And that;s why they were beaten with a punch by an airfoce who has bamboo and grass hut hangars, and that's why US airforce doctored every record of shotdown planes over vietnam as it was staggering and very embarrassing.. Engine lifespan are deliberately shortened for cost savings and practicality.. In real world war scenarios, a fighter jet wont last 3mnonths.. The idea is to build more... The same concept they showed in the T34 tank during world war 2 which surprised the might German Army.

    • @silkplayer9
      @silkplayer9 12 днів тому +6

      @@kentstructures4388 we aren’t in the 60s anymore wake up.

    • @silkplayer9
      @silkplayer9 12 днів тому +3

      @@kentstructures4388 “fall from the sky in every mission” yeah nice make up story with no proof to back it up but ok.

    • @silkplayer9
      @silkplayer9 12 днів тому +4

      @@kentstructures4388 “an airforce who has bamboo and grass hut hangars” as an person who has several generations served in Vietnamese’s people airforce date back to vietnam war era I would kindly demand you provide proof of this statement, but of course you can’t.

  • @stever5731
    @stever5731 12 днів тому +25

    Retired USAF AWACS radar operator here. Thanks for your service. I can confidently confirm that the USAF is far superior in every way compared to the russian air force. 😂 In fact the US Navy air power is superior compared to the russian air force. I yawn every time I hear the russians brag about the power of their pathetic air force.

    • @ВоваВова-ь3ч
      @ВоваВова-ь3ч 10 днів тому

      🤣российские самолеты в тренировочных боях всегда выигрывали у американцев, за счет чего они интересно победят в реальном бою?

    • @moonasha
      @moonasha 9 днів тому

      ​@ВоваВова-ь3ч in training americans set their forces up to lose so they can actually learn something. Dummies like you see that and think it's representative of reality. In reality an F-22 would just take out any russian aircraft from 150km away while being invisible.

    • @cnhaygood1865
      @cnhaygood1865 8 днів тому

      At least the Russians know their pronouns.

    • @stever5731
      @stever5731 8 днів тому

      @cnhaygood1865 Quite an idiotic comment but I expect nothing different from a filthy russian 🤣

    • @FatBobGer
      @FatBobGer 5 днів тому +2

      @ВоваВова-ь3ч Так ли хороши российские самолеты, как и российские системы ПВО, которые только что прошли боевое крещение в Иране? Они были полностью разрушены.

  • @suki4410
    @suki4410 13 днів тому +14

    Only the russian planes appear on the radar screen. No need for friend and foe system.

  • @dlxmarks
    @dlxmarks 13 днів тому +29

    I stopped paying attention to Russian hype even before they bestowed the Su-75 fiberglass and plywood mockup at the MAKS air show with the grandiose name of "Checkmate."

    • @lesterstanden2435
      @lesterstanden2435 13 днів тому +2

      I was beginning to think I'd imagined the launch of the SU-75 and that it was only me who remembered. It was an ephemeral apparition that appeared, disappeared and was forgotten about in 2021.

    • @SoloRenegade
      @SoloRenegade 11 днів тому +1

      checkmate isn't teh NATO reporting name. if it ever got built (unlikely), NATO would give it a name.

    • @lesterstanden2435
      @lesterstanden2435 11 днів тому +4

      @@SoloRenegade Checkmate was the name Putin announced it to be. He probably thought of it himself as it's the kind of dumb thing he'd think of.

    • @SoloRenegade
      @SoloRenegade 11 днів тому

      @@lesterstanden2435 yes, teh Russians tried to come up with some "cool" name, not realizing that NATO would still just give it a designation that starts with "F", like,
      Flogger
      Flanker
      Fulcrum
      Felon
      Faggot
      Fishbed
      etc.

    • @dlxmarks
      @dlxmarks 10 днів тому +3

      @@SoloRenegade Yes and the convention will be a name beginning with F that is not particularly complimentary: Felon, Flatpack, Flounder, Foxbat, etc.

  • @silkplayer9
    @silkplayer9 13 днів тому +42

    On Andy Stumpf’s Clear Hot Podcast a former Navy pilot who flys the F/a 18 Super Hornet describes when he “spar” with a F-22 it’s like he was fighting an alien spaceship with otherworldly power. And that is the plane was designed in the 80s and comes to operation in the 90s.

    • @vladpootin5973
      @vladpootin5973 13 днів тому

      !!!! & mind you, an F18 Super Hornet is levels above anything russia actually has in reality, I mean, outside of its feverdream vapoware and wikipedia-vatnik claims, 😏

    • @tedarcher9120
      @tedarcher9120 12 днів тому +7

      F-22 is still untouched. Even US can't make anything close

    • @trentvlak
      @trentvlak 12 днів тому +4

      one F-22 engine makes more thrust than both superbug engines combined.

    • @moonasha
      @moonasha 9 днів тому

      @@tedarcher9120 you should look up what the NGAD or F/A-XX is.

    • @tedarcher9120
      @tedarcher9120 8 днів тому +1

      @@moonasha yeah they don't exist tho

  • @NothernNate
    @NothernNate 13 днів тому +80

    The F-22 has a 1000 times smaller radar signature. 👊🏼

    • @vladpootin5973
      @vladpootin5973 13 днів тому +15

      An F117 is still leagues above that „russian stealth jet“ & those chinese kludges.
      The xinese j20 / j31/35 are „temu stealth“,

    • @ngm1237
      @ngm1237 12 днів тому

      Says who?
      Arrogant Americans without facts, that's who.

    • @Лайм-и7э
      @Лайм-и7э 12 днів тому +3

      F-22 Это Ведро с болтами уже снят во всех ракурсах и со всеми сигнатурами, его легко видит радар в дециметровом диапазоне.

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 12 днів тому +6

      Those exposed and rusty engines will never make the su57 a gen 5 stealth. It's a 4.5 at best

    • @Лайм-и7э
      @Лайм-и7э 12 днів тому

      @@larryc1616 Дурачок, продолжай курить западные газеты)
      Вы Идиоты и про "Кинжал" и "Циркон" говорили что это анимация. А теперь вас Идиотов накрыли ОРЕШНИКОМ)

  • @Miroslaw-rs8ip
    @Miroslaw-rs8ip 13 днів тому +22

    Russian claims are always overblown and overhyped! I visited and stayed in Russia for a year so I understand their propaganda, I would take F-22 Raptor any day over Russian so called 5th generation fighters.

    • @benbarbash5473
      @benbarbash5473 12 днів тому +3

      Ha.. would take a F-16 over a SU-57

    • @hermes7587
      @hermes7587 12 днів тому +1

      @@benbarbash5473 There are thousands of F-16 in existence but only a handfull of SU-57 and Russia is currently not in the best shape to produce massive numbers of this model even if it would work fine. Yes, I would take a massive number of proven planes over a few overhyped showpieces.

    • @benbarbash5473
      @benbarbash5473 12 днів тому +1

      @@hermes7587 not massive numbers…one on one.

    • @hermes7587
      @hermes7587 12 днів тому +2

      @@benbarbash5473 I do not think that the rules of chivalry apply top a modern war. The weight of numbers is a thing and a few 4.5 gen fighters will not help Russia neither against NATO nor China. And the fact that Russia does not even use them to bully Ukrain speaks volumes...

    • @Ruslan.Demidov
      @Ruslan.Demidov 12 днів тому

      @@hermes7587 жертва еврейской пропаганды)))

  • @The_Judge300
    @The_Judge300 13 днів тому +22

    I find it hilarious how the Russians talk about building a 6th gen fighter when they have not even built a 5th gen fighter yet.
    The Su-57 is a 4.5th gen fighter if we are generous and rather a 4.25th gen in my opinion.
    The reality is that the Russians are rather far from building that 5th gen fighter and how the war goes and if the sanctions stay in place or get stricter, it will take a VERY long time for the Russians to build a true 5th gen fighter.
    The reality is that the US is competing against China when it comes to building better fighters now, and not Russia anymore.
    The reality is that the newest Gripen would make a total mockery of the Su-57 as well.
    Russia have dropped so far behind and will drop even further behind because of Putin's stupidity and all the corruption in Russia.
    Yes, the Russian fighters are still a danger, but VERY far from as dangerous as most think they are.

    • @SCH292
      @SCH292 13 днів тому +8

      SU57 is like those unfinished games we see on Steam. Lol

    • @johndoeyedoe
      @johndoeyedoe 12 днів тому +2

      ​@@SCH292🤣 frikn gold bro!

    • @jonathanmstevens
      @jonathanmstevens 12 днів тому +4

      Takes money to build a 5th generation aircraft, not to mention the technological know-how. How can you possibly build a 5th generation fighter when you have to resource the majority of your components from other countries and sanctions are preventing that. The clock is ticking for Russia, and their end could come at any time, it's sad they regressed back to their old ways, they could have had so much more.

    • @Ruslan.Demidov
      @Ruslan.Demidov 12 днів тому +1

      @@jonathanmstevens ))) Россия самая богатая страна в мире, но то что вам ваши журналисты говорят.

    • @ВоваВова-ь3ч
      @ВоваВова-ь3ч 10 днів тому +1

      Думаю что только воздушный бой может показать чей самолет лучше. Су-57 в воздушном бою это грозная машина. Путин предлагал сбить систему Орешник в Киеве, хваленой американской системой пво указав место и время атаки, на что последовала тишина. Думаю ему надо вызвать и лучших пилотов НАТО на дуэль на любом самолете - истребителе против Су-57.

  • @kazekamiha
    @kazekamiha 10 днів тому +4

    I imagine by the time the US deploys hover tanks Russia will still be using T-72s and T-90s.
    The air war would be so one sided as to be a joke.

    • @bloodlustshiva1
      @bloodlustshiva1 6 днів тому +1

      I believe the term for US pilots vs current russian aircraft would be "live fire exercise."

    • @kazekamiha
      @kazekamiha 6 днів тому +1

      @@bloodlustshiva1 XD

  • @xyz-yf2kr
    @xyz-yf2kr 12 днів тому +6

    Nice presentation. The workmanship and parts fitment on the Russian jets are exceedingly substandard. Probably have Vodka caps rattling around in the airframe 😁

  • @tomwende5529
    @tomwende5529 13 днів тому +7

    They haven't been able to design or field a proper fighter since they combined the design houses into a single entity. They used to compete -HEAVILY-. down to the component level Lacking this competition, good enough isn't. I appreciate the radar primer.

  • @markbrisec3972
    @markbrisec3972 12 днів тому +2

    Wes, my man, it's so refreshing to see and hear Americans that hold to the good old values of democracy, cross Atlantic partnership, realizing that Russia isn't our friend, etc... You know, the old, yesterday's values. Unlike modern views held by lunatics like Musk, Teale, etc.. Views that US should pull their troops from the world and defend the southern border from the "hordes" of immigrants.. Modern views that hold Russia, China and N Korea as our friends while NATO is Europe's defense alliance that USA finances for nothing...
    I grew up loving America the way it was.. Allied with us in EU, cherishing democracy and being on the right side of history (most of the times)..
    I know people like you are still a majority in USA but are silenced by the louder and richer minority... Keep it real man...

    • @bloodlustshiva1
      @bloodlustshiva1 6 днів тому

      Anybody supporting Russia in the US should be barred from ever serving in a government position, ever. It's shown itself to be a true terrorist state for years now. No excuses left if you're supporting them in a democratic country.

  • @tresphore3185
    @tresphore3185 11 днів тому +3

    Sometimes it's better to keep quiet if you have nothing to say. Ignorance is indeed a powerful tool,but to see normal people shamelessly talking for the cameras out of hate is way beyond what I expected from you. But objectivity has become a foreign agent nowadays, unfortunately?

  • @DrQuagmire
    @DrQuagmire 12 днів тому +5

    When that Su-57 was doing the nose up crawl it appeared around the mid engine are on the top on the jet was burning the paint off. Smoke was coming right off both engines in that area. It must be quite visible in the IR range from multiple angles. It also absolutely does not have any radar sponge paint.. ie; basic F117 paint job back in the day which is generation more advanced today on US stealth aircraft.

    • @Տիգրան-ժ1է
      @Տիգրան-ժ1է 4 дні тому

      So there is no coating on the Su-57, invisibility is achieved with the help of polymers from which the fuselage is made.

    • @DrQuagmire
      @DrQuagmire 3 дні тому

      @@Տիգրան-ժ1է that is absolutely not the case and the biggest load of garbage I’ve ever heard.. Polymers help with weight, performance. The coating does not make up for the size and angles of the aircraft which allows for radars to pick it up. The engines are also a problem. It’s unable to super cruise, ie; it can’t go the speed on sound without afterburners making it incredibly bright within the infrared light that AA systems lock on to. Polymers are not radar absorbent in any way.

  • @Maxfr8
    @Maxfr8 9 днів тому +2

    VOLTRON is Russia's next fighter
    👾.

  • @paraweir
    @paraweir 13 днів тому +5

    The phrase "Made in China or ruzzia" come to mind...

    • @johndoeyedoe
      @johndoeyedoe 12 днів тому

      Hey, at least Chinese made crap works, mostly. 🤣🤣🤣

    • @stevenclarke5606
      @stevenclarke5606 4 дні тому

      When Russia needs, Chinese parts , lol

  • @stevechance150
    @stevechance150 13 днів тому +14

    Remind me, how many SU-57 exist? 12, maybe 14 if you count test aircraft. And we have how many F-35s? Like 630, and we're going to build 1,800. Russia is a paper tiger, but let's keep spending our entire GDP on military contractors.

    • @Ollies2CentsWardill
      @Ollies2CentsWardill 12 днів тому

      Entire GDP? Hyperbole. It's less than 4% and that includes pensions and medical care, which most nations don't include. The US needs to rationalise it's contracting process, but they certainly can't afford to compromise on military capability. Try telling Ukraine that Russia are a paper tiger. Tens of thousands of Ukrainians are sacrificing their lives to wear down the Russian arsenal and the West are finding out how foolish their talk of peace dividends and "the end of history" is. New threats are always a possibility and China are not skimping on military spending. It never changes, there are always people who fail to learn the lessons of history and advocate for leaving their nations unprepared for military threats, either naively or maliciously.

    • @thorstenguenther
      @thorstenguenther 12 днів тому +3

      Don't forget you're also exporting the F-35, we (Germany) e.g. are buyers since we are obliged to have a carrier aircraft for B61 nuclear bombs and the Tornado is really showing its age.

    • @Ruslan.Demidov
      @Ruslan.Demidov 12 днів тому

      иди в лобовую воевать с русскими а не прятаться за спины украинцев. Сразу поймешь, что ты просто дождик в туалете )))

    • @doogsm6013
      @doogsm6013 10 днів тому

      How many of those F35's are grounded right now? F22 OBOGS killed pilots! I remember the USAF getting their asses kicked in Korea. How many aircraft were lost in Vietnam? The USSR built a space station by themselves. Who was flying the supply missions to the ISS for years? Rocks and glass houses.

    • @JOHNTSHEA
      @JOHNTSHEA 8 днів тому

      The US spends just 3.5% of its GDP on Its military, mostly on the salaries of soldiers, sailors and Air Force personel.

  • @jjohnson796
    @jjohnson796 13 днів тому +10

    Thank you, thank you, thank you! Finally someone addressed the huge thermal signature the Felon and the Chengdu J-20 have in comparison to the F-22 and F-35. In an era of multispectral sensors thermal tracking IS a thing and controling radio reflection and emissions are only one part of the new stealth equation.

    • @johndoeyedoe
      @johndoeyedoe 12 днів тому

      You can use missiles from the 1960s to shoot down both...

  • @thekhan1987
    @thekhan1987 12 днів тому +4

    maybe unpopular opinion here, not sure. But, I think the paint job is kick ass

    • @USS-SNAKE-ISLAND
      @USS-SNAKE-ISLAND 12 днів тому +1

      It's a pretty plane. I agree. But I'll bet there's a good reason the US doesn't paint their planes that way.

    • @thekhan1987
      @thekhan1987 12 днів тому +1

      @@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND Who said anything about America?

    • @sogerc1
      @sogerc1 12 днів тому +4

      @@thekhan1987 No, I think the concensus is that the Su-57 looks good. A lot of people like how the Flanker looks too, although I don't like the humps on their backs and the tailboom.
      I think what USS-SNAKE-ISLAND was referring to is that the stealth coating has it's own color, I'd guess they don't paint over it to maximize radar absorption.

    • @thekhan1987
      @thekhan1987 11 днів тому

      @@sogerc1 got cha

  • @BW022
    @BW022 12 днів тому +2

    Let's be honest here... Russia will never be able to create anything better than it already has on any major weapon system. China and Europe probably won't be able to either -- or will do so on extreme time lines it doesn't matter. You simply can't support advances in weapon research when you have non-sustainable birth rates. You simply don't have enough workers to make food, to support workers making basic necessities, to support university, chip manufacturing, etc. Each time your working age demographic shrinks, not only does that mean less workers, those workers now have to support their aging parents and grandparents. You can't make microchips when you have 20% less workers and 50% more people in nursing homes.

    • @kenik2023
      @kenik2023 5 днів тому

      You just explained why communism and socialism doesn't work...👀

    • @BW022
      @BW022 4 дні тому

      @@kenik2023It started in advanced western nations long before other nations. GDP reaching a certain point seems to be a trigger -- Japan, Canada, Australia, Southern Europe, Germany, the Scandinavian countries, etc. are extremely free nations which also have that issue. Even religious countries seem not to be immune to it and even in the US fertility rates vary massively within states. The US is barely even, and that's likely due to being a massive target for immigration. It just happened faster in developing countries since they went through the post-industrial age so rapidly -- often within a couple of generations.

  • @daviddealba1988
    @daviddealba1988 6 днів тому +1

    The Su 57 was as impressive as an adversary in "Top Gun: Maverick" as the MiG 28 in the original movie.

  • @FLJBeliever1776
    @FLJBeliever1776 12 днів тому +3

    You should reach out to Habitual Linecrosser. He's US Army AIr Defender and works on Patriot. His character, F-22 'The Kid' Raptor once torched the Su-57 Felon as not having an RCS but a Zip Code! Which tells you a lot about his opinion. Big time.

  • @AARONSHEERN
    @AARONSHEERN 7 днів тому +1

    I will give Russia credit for making some of my favorite planes in the Ace Combat games!

  • @mitchelldomanski549
    @mitchelldomanski549 12 днів тому +2

    Hi Wes. Love your show very informative. Totally agree with your analysis that a lot of russia military equipment is crap. Anyway, most importantly, merry Christmas 🎅 🎄 to you and your family and we are looking forward to your awesome show continuing in the new year. "Crikey" 😂 From Vicki and Mitch 🇦🇺. Slava ukraine 🇺🇦.

  • @turbomustang84
    @turbomustang84 12 днів тому +2

    They can't manufacture a reasonably good car so a 5th gen fighter is kind of out of reach .
    The Soviet Union had most of their tech built in Ukraine however the Russians make damn fine stackable dolls

  • @amanofnoreputation2164
    @amanofnoreputation2164 12 днів тому +2

    ". . . Well we detected the F-35s, but their radar cross-section was so small we assumed they were commercial drones moving at mach 1.6."

    • @megarafjogos
      @megarafjogos 5 днів тому

      Well, we detected f-35s, at 30km, but their radar cross section looked like noise and was filtered out by the system. Also, by this point, they had already blown us up.
      To give you some perspective, take a photo with your phone camera and zoom in 10000x. One of those tiny little blurry blobs of pixels might be an f-35 or f-22, who knows...
      That's what they see, nothing. If you set the sensitivity to the point where it can detect the f-35, it would pick up false f-35s everywhere, every single one of those blurry pixel blobs in your photo would be a potential f-35...

  • @ericepperson8409
    @ericepperson8409 7 годин тому

    I think the most telling thing about where Russia's aerospace programs are - recent airshows had the Su-57 fly a a pretty impressive show with tight turns, cobra maneuvers, and flat spins. Then the latest F-15 with fly by wire controls and upgraded avionics did an air show with many of the same characteristics. US military contractors put current controls on an airframe designed 50 years ago and proved it was just as capable as something Russia barely can produce today. If Russian aircraft were so great, then their Air Force should have been able to establish dominance over a neighboring country within weeks. it doesn't even take into account how abysmal their pilots and maintainers are at keeping up an oerational tempo or deconflicting airspace to operate more than a handful of craft at a time without crashing into or shooting each other down.

  • @DragonsinGenesisPodcast
    @DragonsinGenesisPodcast 8 днів тому +1

    SU-57 is a beautiful plane. But that’s about all it has going for it.

  • @TheNothing00000
    @TheNothing00000 5 днів тому +2

    American pilots are saying it's a good fighter.
    I think you're just being hot band wagon garbage personally.
    Anything Russian is low hanging fruit right now.
    Be more creative dude.

    • @katostovol8454
      @katostovol8454 2 дні тому +1

      Nobody even said that Felon is a 6th Gen this guy just made this Up.

  • @jmcw9632
    @jmcw9632 13 днів тому +10

    What was the incredible interceptor jet Russia made mig 24 or 25? America went ape5h1t and developed the tomcat or strike eagle in retaliation, joke being the migs stats were a lie, so the usa totally over developed their fighter programme, cheers Russia lol

    • @tomwende5529
      @tomwende5529 13 днів тому +4

      The Foxbat. Once a pilot defected to Japan with one, there was a collective, "Oh."

    • @joshcarter-com
      @joshcarter-com 13 днів тому +2

      Yea, USA went crazy thinking the MIG-25 was amazing, and built the F-15 to counter it. The F-15 was revolutionary; the MIG-25 was fast but that’s it.

    • @johndoeyedoe
      @johndoeyedoe 12 днів тому

      It (mig 25) was developed to intercept the spy plane blackbird. America developed the f15.
      The mig 25 wasn't able to do sh!+.

    • @USS-SNAKE-ISLAND
      @USS-SNAKE-ISLAND 12 днів тому

      Yeah, like Reagan suckered the soviets with the "Star Wars" program that bankrupted the soviet union and won the Cold War. Master Class.

    • @siubhan2047
      @siubhan2047 12 днів тому

      ​@@joshcarter-comcorrection. The mig-25 was fast... once. Pushing top speed it destroyed the engines.

  • @sherman-j5j
    @sherman-j5j 8 днів тому +1

    The Su-57 was never a true stealth or 5th gen.

  • @arbelico2
    @arbelico2 13 днів тому +3

    Greetings. I am concerned that Russian aviation will reach the level of 4th generation Western aviation.

  • @PeypaMikko-1842
    @PeypaMikko-1842 8 днів тому +1

    Not too bad, but you should check some facts. F-5 and MiG-21 never fought during the Korean Conflict, contrary to what you said at 08:35 .

  • @TimeIsHQ
    @TimeIsHQ 12 днів тому +2

    What about Oreshnik?

  • @brucecampbell3062
    @brucecampbell3062 13 днів тому +10

    Tom cruise designed the Su 57 for his movies. His design worked better than the Russian plane 😅

    • @Rasnaaa
      @Rasnaaa 11 днів тому +1

      You are funny with your fairytale

    • @shaunvduke
      @shaunvduke 5 годин тому +1

      ​@Rasnaaa it's as believable as russias claims for that garbage.

  • @emillio_gonzales
    @emillio_gonzales 2 дні тому

    Absolutely one of the best modern aircraft in the world! The new engines have become more powerful

  • @cubethai
    @cubethai 13 днів тому +2

    ”Yeah, sure it does, Sputnik” 😂😂

  • @JSFGuy
    @JSFGuy 13 днів тому +2

    Right, pre-production. Nobody wants to buy it. It looks fun in the demos.

  • @SmallTownTactical
    @SmallTownTactical 6 днів тому

    The SU57 is what happens when you buy the base game SU35, then get a new skin in the shop

  • @amanofnoreputation2164
    @amanofnoreputation2164 12 днів тому +1

    My first impression of the SU-57 Femboy was,
    "Why does the weird coppery-looking bits leading up to the engine nozzles look like my indoor plumbing?"

  • @jacksonteller1337
    @jacksonteller1337 10 днів тому +1

    So basically the sixth generation aircraft is coming as another Su-30 derivative with none of the characteristics of a fifth or sixth generation aircraft.

  • @verzeda
    @verzeda 11 днів тому +1

    Russia: inflation over 9.5%
    Also Russia: WE MAKE BEST PLANES IN THE WORLD FIRST COS WE'RE SO RICH

    • @sujitbala1492
      @sujitbala1492 10 днів тому

      bro thinks he's richer than russia

    • @bloodlustshiva1
      @bloodlustshiva1 6 днів тому

      @@sujitbala1492 That... response didn't make any sense. Also, several private companies and states in the US have a higher GDP than russia does. Look it up.

  • @trentvlak
    @trentvlak 12 днів тому +1

    SU57 rcs is 100x larger than the f117 as measured over Ukraine. In 2050 they are saying they might be at parity with where the USA was in 1993. Logarithms don't complicate math; they make large variations in numbers more manageable. Excellent presentation. Subscribed.

  • @andybeans5790
    @andybeans5790 7 днів тому +1

    I did make a 5th generation fighter, but the dog ate it, honest

  • @superbikemike
    @superbikemike 11 днів тому

    Top notch info… thank you.. well crafted 👊🏻

  • @ewasteredux
    @ewasteredux 13 днів тому

    Thanks again Wes. Happy holidays!

  • @Norwegian733
    @Norwegian733 12 днів тому +2

    Russia has never had a 5. generation fighter (at most 4,5) and certainly not a 6. generation 😂

  • @BB-uj1jp
    @BB-uj1jp 11 днів тому

    Amazing Video as allways ! Can you so a video on ngad where you Compare it to the 5th gen fighters?

  • @robertpesche
    @robertpesche 9 днів тому +1

    If supercruise is required to be a 5th gen fighter, what do you call the F-35?

  • @johnnylind-n7j
    @johnnylind-n7j 12 днів тому +1

    That jet cant even beat Swedens Gripen , let alone any modern jet in the world .

  • @hgm8337
    @hgm8337 6 днів тому +1

    Putin taking a leaf out of Musk's playbook seems

  • @PapaDutch
    @PapaDutch 13 днів тому +1

    ~ MAN how I love your breakdowns...
    That's a dynamite tech explanation, I salute you!

  • @othyvitswamba1111
    @othyvitswamba1111 12 днів тому +1

    I wonder why forming NATO just in the fear of the garbage.

    • @istvansipos9940
      @istvansipos9940 7 днів тому +1

      in 1949? Just a few years after the end of ww2? When an almost Asian sized dictatorship had a few million veterans and a gazillion tons of very capable military hardware? And when every sane adult knew that a soviet nuke will be ready within a few years tops?
      Fear was justified. And the topic of this video wasn't even a dream yet. I wonder why you asked a question about a 1949 event under this video.

  • @joshcarter-com
    @joshcarter-com 13 днів тому +1

    Get an Air Force radar operator talking planes and RCS, and it’s time to break out the pencils, graph paper, and scientific calculator. Class is in session! 😊

  • @George_M_
    @George_M_ 8 днів тому +1

    Su-35 in F-22 drag.

  • @williamhardes8081
    @williamhardes8081 12 днів тому +2

    so to be considered a 5th gen fighter its abilities must in include supercruise. mmmm. so does that mean the F-35 is just a 5th gen fighter for those few minutes of supercruise it can manage before the engine shits itself. when you see the surface finish, panel shapes and alignment on the Felon i think my car may have a lower radar signature.

    • @tedarcher9120
      @tedarcher9120 12 днів тому

      It can supercruise for longer but then stealth coating will be damaged. I think supercruise is overrated anyway, with modern gliding bombs and long range missiles it's not much of an advantage

  • @davidlloyd1526
    @davidlloyd1526 8 днів тому +1

    Russia doesn't have the money to build jet fighters - the USSR could barely afford it. If they had sensibly managed their oil deposits, they would have enough cash to build a nice comfortable middle-class country. Hard to know what they are thinking... Russia has the population of Germany and France, and low GDP

  • @Chris.Davies
    @Chris.Davies 11 днів тому

    I have been saying this since it was released.
    The SU-57 in DCS is stupidly OP, and far superior to the actual aeroplane - which only has a propaganda function.

  • @bluemarlin8138
    @bluemarlin8138 12 днів тому +1

    The first major hint that not all was what it seemed with the Su-57 is when it was announced that Ruzzia was building it and making its usual absurd claims.

  • @CountSadistOIII
    @CountSadistOIII 12 днів тому

    Hi Wes ,u got great channel shouts to you from Suomi Finland 🇫🇮

  • @ThatSockmonkey
    @ThatSockmonkey 12 днів тому +1

    I know it's just part of the rumour mill, so take it for what it's worth, but I've heard that there are only 7 operational airframes, all prototypes. Also, it's essentially a 4th gen aircraft with a body kit. Almost all of the money for the entire Su57 program was stolen. Same happened with Armata, S400, tyres, ammo, rations, you name it, all pilfered or outright stolen. Lol.

  • @badfaceday7509
    @badfaceday7509 12 днів тому +1

    Honestly, that's how we know Russia and have known them since the 60s.
    They have it all in their mouths and the weapons they actually make - although some of them look nice, are nothing more than a load of crap.
    I have held a position in the Danish defense where I have worked with air defense. Yes, actually back from when 40 mm Bofors cannons were the real backbone of this defense. And have actually - as perhaps one of the relatively few Danes - tried to lock onto one of their planes, with a Superfledermaus Shooting Radar (Target Designation and TargetDataControl - controlling the cannons). It was much easier to track a MIG-23 (Flogger) than it was to track and lock onto an old Danish Draken. And back then they also claimed that they were far superior to everything NATO had.
    But I guess that's just a way they use to get more money out of the treasury and into the always infinitely deep private pockets of the generals. Increased appropriations to finance their summer homes and cars - not weapons - God forbid. Long live Russian corruption - as long as it lives healthy and strong we have nothing to fear.

  • @tommix6016
    @tommix6016 7 днів тому

    Russian superweapons are so tough, sophisticated and mighty they don't even to mine the materials to build them.😂

  • @GrahamCStrouse
    @GrahamCStrouse 4 години тому

    There’s likely never going to be a fighter run entirely by machine-learning algorithms & certainly not in the near future.

  • @Shinobubu
    @Shinobubu 9 днів тому +1

    If it's even stealth why won't they use it to gain an advantage at an actual war? lol

  • @jb1bradley
    @jb1bradley 13 днів тому

    Great informative video!

  • @antoniomiguelsimao
    @antoniomiguelsimao 2 дні тому

    I think the variations of a logarithmic magnitude are logarithmic not exponencial.

  • @Member00101
    @Member00101 8 днів тому

    The only thing the SU57 has going for it is the thrust vectoring which would give it an advantage during close range air to air. Problem with that is that most newer air to air systems are built to be effective outside visual range. So all that fancy flying does nothing when you won't ever be close enough to another aircraft to take advantage of it.

  • @dennisst.pierre210
    @dennisst.pierre210 12 днів тому +1

    3yrs. Can’t roll over Ukraine.😵

    • @bloodlustshiva1
      @bloodlustshiva1 6 днів тому

      I love their logic of "This war would be over if not for the NATO troops that we're fighting!" and in the next breath, "NATO's too scared* to fight us, they don't stand a chance!" lmao

  • @ulfpe
    @ulfpe 13 днів тому +1

    IF it goes even worse they will announce even more super weapons

  • @hellboundchaoscommand7567
    @hellboundchaoscommand7567 7 днів тому

    Please let’s not insult garbage here

  • @mikelittle5250
    @mikelittle5250 2 дні тому

    What? These SU-57's are the best!!! They developed "True Stealth" No one's seen or heard from them.

  • @leetattitude6808
    @leetattitude6808 13 днів тому +6

    Dear Mr O'Donnel, loved the radar presentation, so according to you, the F-35 is not a 5th gen fighter for not having supercruise (it did in earlier paper presentations), but the Dassault Rafale and Eurofighter have 5th gen propulsion. Interesting.

    • @druspork7737
      @druspork7737 12 днів тому +1

      The super cruise on the F35 is a somewhat overblown claim as I understand it. Apparently it works once you use the afterburner to get it there. I thought the Su27 and its later derivatives was a fabulous fighter and (like the FA-18) should not be underestimated. The US issue these days is overly expensive equipment that is fine at reduced quantity before war. If a kinetic war does break out though, sooner or later it becomes a quantity and manufacturing race. Russia may be a lost cause but things are less clear with China.

    • @joshafc41
      @joshafc41 12 днів тому

      The Rafale can't super cruise either.

    • @joshafc41
      @joshafc41 12 днів тому

      ​@@druspork7737 the F35 cannot super cruise. What you described is a supersonic dash which is what all fighters that can't super cruise or want to accelerate quickly do.

  • @JimMcIntosh-x9m
    @JimMcIntosh-x9m День тому

    This fighters absence from ukraine conflict is an elephant in the room. The t90 failed, the alligator failed, the terminator failed, , the russ are good with feild cannons ..

  • @istvansipos9940
    @istvansipos9940 7 днів тому

    calling it a sheep in wolf clothing? That was so offensive to wolves!

  • @dragonsystems5973
    @dragonsystems5973 13 днів тому +1

    Yeah... who cares though?? Arent most of their buyers also our enemies?? Let our enemies buy this stuff...

    • @bloodlustshiva1
      @bloodlustshiva1 6 днів тому

      Problem is most of them don't want it either. lol

  • @workonesabs
    @workonesabs 11 днів тому +1

    Looks nice and want the XFLY rc model of it,but can imagine all russian hardware is junk - and obsolete rubbish. Still a good looking aircraft and shame if they get destroyed .

  • @avus-kw2f213
    @avus-kw2f213 8 днів тому

    The reasons not much SU 57 have been used in the war with the Ukraine is because Russia doesn’t have many
    This isn’t because Russia can’t build any it’s because there’s problems with the izdeliye 30 and the Air Force doesn’t want to accept any aircraft with the old engines
    But despite these problems it has still been able to achieve air to air victory against stealth target (the malfunctioning drone still counts)

  • @orlock20
    @orlock20 10 днів тому

    I would say gen 4 was multi targeting and generation 4.5 was network multi targeting. The F-14 could use its radar to attack 8 targets at once. Network targeting is one craft or person on the ground feeding target information electronically rather than over the radio.
    That multi targeting and network targeting is important, because it seems the Russians don't have that capability.

  • @brettclark8020
    @brettclark8020 12 днів тому

    In the Southern tradition of finding something nice to say, that's a very stylish paint job. Bless their heart!

  • @ME262MKI
    @ME262MKI 10 днів тому

    Just by watching those shinny engines i can say that thing isn't stealth at all

  • @ivanzlatar2445
    @ivanzlatar2445 11 днів тому

    Please note: Fully agree with the context and message here. HOWEVER< F-35 DOES NOT SUPERCRUISE ! Not even close

  • @crowdpleaser1036
    @crowdpleaser1036 6 днів тому

    I often think these days that the new 'Cold War' is just a myth like the 'Bogeyman under the bed'. Once upon a time many years ago the USSR could put twenty Mig 21s in the air for every single F15 so weight of numbers gave them a chance to even the score. That is obviously no longer the case, the latest Russian combat aircraft can't actually outperform US jets from the 70s as has been consistently demonstrated in the skies over Ukraine. The Russian 5th gen fighters are actually 3rd gen fighters in disguise.

  • @peterxyz3541
    @peterxyz3541 8 днів тому +1

    Lesson: US organizations don’t brag (sales brochures are it’s own world of ‘bragging’). Weaker org, such as Russia, NKor and CCP will constantly brag or put on Potemkin style demo.
    The deeper lesson here: only the uniformed or weak minded or the fragile ego people or lazy people will buy into Potemkin bragging.

    • @bloodlustshiva1
      @bloodlustshiva1 6 днів тому

      When you're the best, you don't need to constantly scream at people that you are. Hence all the chest thumping from failing dictatorships.

  • @aodhhanswtor7252
    @aodhhanswtor7252 3 дні тому

    Not good for Russia, since we're looking at 6th generation in the early 2030s.

  • @MAXIMUSLOK
    @MAXIMUSLOK 12 днів тому

    By military point of view Simple:
    Su 57 it's a 4.8 Gen NOT 5th.gen and especially 6gen.
    The only 5th generation fighter it's the f22a until the tempest and fcas arrival
    (6th.gen)
    🇪🇺🇺🇸🦾 MAX.

  • @pabasaravimukthi
    @pabasaravimukthi 13 днів тому

    The F-22 Raptor, introduced in 1996, represents a remarkable achievement in aerospace engineering. As the world's first operational fifth-generation fighter, it set a high bar for stealth, agility, and multi-role capability. Its design prioritizes unmatched stealth characteristics, advanced avionics, and supercruise capabilities, making it a cornerstone of U.S. air dominance.
    In contrast, the Russian Su-57 Felon, marketed as a fifth-generation fighter, struggles to match the F-22's performance. The Su-57 has faced persistent issues, including delays, production challenges, and questions about its actual combat readiness. Its design, while innovative in certain aspects, lacks some critical features that define true fifth-generation aircraft
    Unlike the F-22, the Su-57's engine nozzles are exposed, undermining its stealth profile. This not only increases its radar cross-section but also makes it more vulnerable to infrared detection. Analysts have pointed out that the Su-57 incorporates elements resembling fourth-generation fighters, with stealth appearing as an afterthought rather than a core design principle. The Su-57's development has been hampered by limited production numbers and reliability concerns. Only a handful of operational units exist, compared to the F-22's proven track record in service. The avionics, sensors, and integration of the Su-57 lag behind the F-22, which boasts unparalleled situational awareness and networked combat capabilities.
    While Russian state media often positions the Su-57 as a rival to the F-22, objective comparisons reveal a significant performance gap. The F-22, with its proven combat effectiveness and advanced engineering, remains a symbol of American technological superiority in aerial warfare.

  • @gablob30
    @gablob30 7 днів тому

    Their 5th gen plane is not really 5th gen, and theirs SAMs work better as a ballistic surface to surface missile.

  • @butterwaffeln
    @butterwaffeln 13 днів тому +1

    B-2 is 5th generation bomber

  • @tomsmith2587
    @tomsmith2587 13 днів тому +2

    But what about the T-14? Now that's a super weapon! Right?

    • @rogerwilco5918
      @rogerwilco5918 13 днів тому

      It's super for parades

    • @AndyWoohoo666
      @AndyWoohoo666 13 днів тому

      Actually it even failed at a parade and never seen in its natural habitat unless it was in a showroom.

    • @JohnJones-k9d
      @JohnJones-k9d 12 днів тому

      But the M1 has excelled?.
      In a shooting war where the other side shoots back we see the M1 is inferior to both leopard and a long way behind challenger with its better gun and armour.

    • @rogerwilco5918
      @rogerwilco5918 12 днів тому +1

      @@JohnJones-k9d who told you that?

    • @AndyWoohoo666
      @AndyWoohoo666 12 днів тому

      @@rogerwilco5918
      Yeah I wonder that as well, that sounds nothing but "patriotic" BS instead of presenting fact.

  • @jean-loupdesbordes4833
    @jean-loupdesbordes4833 10 днів тому

    I think SU 57 is and will stay an unfinished good plane unlike the F35 will be and stay a never finished plane. Sometimes you lose time sometimes you lose money. The problem is to know from what poket.