As a retired law enforcement officer, I retired my 9mm in favor of the 380 because of concealment and weight. I have the Sig 365-380 (with 12 round magazines) and it is great for concealment in the year-round warm climate of Florida where one wears much lighter clothing (no jackets for concealment.) I know the 380 cartridge is not as effective as a 9mm, but I shoot a 380 much more accurately which translates into more hits on target. Now, with high-capacity magazines (15 rounds) of the Ruger Security 380 along with an affordable price, it is a winner. I purchased the Ruger Security 380 recently and it is simply wonderful to shoot. Concealment is more difficult than the Sig 365-380 but, it can be achieved. Both the Sig 365-380 and this Ruger Security 380 are excellent accurate soft shooting handguns worth consideration. I appreciate having more than one handgun of the same caliber, because it makes it easier for me to train and practice with consistency.
Thank you, sir, for watching and commenting. And thank you for your service; LEOs are much under appreciated these days. I am planning a part 2 to this review - after I get the rear sight adjusted and spend more time with it. Unfortunately, I spend more time reviewing firearms than I am able to work with firearms that I need to become intimately familiar with.
@@_cal_techie Thanks for watching, and for the question. Currently, I am using a holster from Muddy River Tactical (muddyrivertactical.com/product/inside-waistband-kydex-holster/). They have many options. I ordered mine in plain black without the claw attachment.
@XSworn-EnemyX Yes, I could have, but if your reading comprehension must be poor as I explained my position for adapting to a 380. Your opinion is noted.
A buddy of mine bought one for $313 taxes and background check and he’s in his mid seventies and he loves it. The easy rack is awesome. I like the trigger and manual safety’s. Don’t like grip safety’s so this weapon is great. Good video, and Ruger did a fantastic job on this weapon.
Thanks for watching and commenting. Both mean a great deal to me. I also like the Security 380 for all the reasons you stated. I think that you can stick a fork in this one, it's well done! 😁
I love this gun. I bought it several months ago and I have over 500 rounds through mine. I love the lite rack system and it shoots great! I use a Kydex inside the waistband holster from Muddy River Tactical. I’m very pleased with the holster also.
Thanks for watching and commenting. The Security 380 is a pleasure to shoot. I just need more time with it to see if the sights are off - or me. It's probably me!
I love mine so much, I purchased two of them. Installed a Viridian CGL green laser/light on one for home defense, MTR custom holster from Gunners Alley. Always in my range bag, my sister loves her also. She can easily rack it even with limited hand strength. Ruger hit one out of the park with this piece.
Sorry, I missed your comment the first go...trying to catch up on the comment. Very happy that you watch and commented. Yes, I think that Ruger did a fine job with this one.
Thank you very much for watching, commenting, and especially subscribing.😁 These things help keep the channel going and growing. From an old guy in Georgia.
Due to arthritis, carpel tunnel, old eyes etc. just bought one $135 out the door with cabellas gift cards, mil discount and club points. Like it so far.
I hear Ruger Security 9 compact holster works, also the Ruger security 9 holsters. Also, nearly all reviews agree that the slide release is junk. Thank you for such a thorough review.
Thanks for watching and commenting. I'll check in with Ruger to verify. The IWB holster from Muddy River Tactical (muddyrivertactical.com/product/inside-waistband-kydex-holster/) is doing an excellent job so far - and it is made for the pistol - no second guessing. I may do a quick review of it, since it might interest people who have or are considering the Security 380.
The 380 ACP when housed in this formst , becomes capable of faster and more accurate follow up shots. For any shooter. The pistol is pleasant to shoot, which becomes more range time.I have found the Ruger Security 380 always finds its way in the range bag. Another plus of the 380 is less report .. especially if having to be fired indoors. Loud cartridges fired indoors for defensive purposes ( no time for hearing protection) can cause disorientation and much discomfort. I mever use +P anything in any of my pistols. I have found the XTP 90gr bullet to function consistently well in 380acp.
Thanks for taking the time out to watch and comment. Like you, I do not run +P ammunition in any of my pistols. Revolvers rated for +P or magnum ammunition are a different story. And, by the way, Happy thanksgiving to you and yours!
Thanks for watching and for your comment. While I don't have tendon issues, I do want to save what tendons I do have. This pistol is a welcome relief after handling and firing pistols that are not so friendly to the hands.
Just ordered one,I always carried a commander,but had cancer in my wrist. The commander still sits by my night table,but I’ll carry this one. I shoot fairly well,and believe I’ll be fine carrying one
Thank you for taking the time to watch the video, comment, and especially subscribing. I hope to keep bring quality reviews to the table on a number of firearms and I hope that you can travel this journey with me. Have a great day!
Nice review. I bought this gun a few weeks ago and it's a really nice gun comfortable in the hands and will be my conceal carry. Finding a holster was interesting but found one that will arrive in a few weeks from "moms who carry" and that one will work with the Enigma carry system too. The only downfall for security 380 is that we leftys cant change the mag release to the left side but that's a minor thing
Thanks for watching and commenting. I do like the Ruger Security 380, and getting used to the thumb safety does takes some practice, but is doable. It's a soft shooter and has performed without fail (so far). Be sure to check out my review of the new Glock G28 - a .380 ACP the size of a Glock G26.
I bought one of these a couple of weeks ago. There is a lot of features on this gun for the $300 retail price. I have had a LCP for years and also bought an LCP Max recently, which will still be my pocket-carry gun. I had been wanting to move to a .380 for my EDC for a while, due to arthritis getting worse in my hands and wrists. While the LCP Max is great for pocket carry, I simply do not shoot it well enough for it to be my primary gun. This Security .380 gives more size for easier shooting and only minor recoil. It allows me to rapidly place all shots in a 3" circle at 7 yards. - No, it is not a bullseye shooter, but it does what it is meant to do. With a .380 from this length barrel, you will only give up about 2" of penetration compared to a 9mm and only loose about 1/18"-3/16" expansion. I will gladly give up both of those stats to be able to put multiple shots on target very rapidly. It will be tough to pull my Walther PDP-F off my EDC belt, but overall, I think the Ruger gives me a better chance if I have to swap more than harsh words with someone.
Thanks for watching my review of the Ruger Security 380, and especially commenting about the pistol. I do like the size of the pistol, as it fits in my hand better than some of the .380 ACP pistols that I own. As you mention, a better fit in the hand means better control of the firearm. I think that Ruger did it right with this pistol. I have no complaints. As far as accuracy, I find that most all firearms are more accurate than I can make them. As is said, "Beware of the man who only owns one gun" and that is a truism. As I review different firearms, pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, etc., getting truly proficient with just one is a challenge - but a 1911 comes the closest for me.
the heavy trigger is what is causing most ppl to complain about it shooting low. it has a 5# which makes your average plinker tend to shoot low. i plan to replaces 2 springs to take it down to 2.5 - 3#
According to the Owner's Manual this pistol is compatible with the Security-9 accessories. I can vouch for the Security-9 R&R Kydex holster, both OWB and IWB, working with the Security-380.
Got mine 3 months ago, still haven't fired it at the range yet lol 😆. Also Ruger SFAR and about 3 other pistols, waiting for warm weather to spend the day at the Range!
Something interesting, Ruger had an LC 380 several years ago that was probably very similar, never had one, so I can't say for sure, but it apparently didn't sell , so it was discontinued.( I believe).
Thanks for watching and for your comment. The Ruger LC 380 is still available at the Ruger website, thus still being sold. It looks like it would be a good DA pistol for pocket carry. It has, though, a lot of competition.
Thanks for commenting. The font size varies but is usually the minimum of 24-point, but most captions are in a larger point size, which should be fine when folks are viewing on a monitor and not a cell phone.
Is the rugar security 380 actually a scaled up version of the lcp2 or lcp max. Can it be carried without the safety on, as the lcp2 without a safety. Just wondering?
Thanks for watching and for your questions. To answer the first, I suppose it could be considered as a scaled up version of the LCP. I do know that it fits my hand better then the LCP. To the second, yes it could be carried with the safety off. From Ruger, we have the following: "The safety should be in its “safe” position at all times except when the user is deliberately positioned to fire at a selected target. When the safety is in the “fire” position (safety lever down) the red oval is exposed just above the safety lever." There is also a warning not to place the safety lever midway: "Placing the safety in an intermediate position between “safe” and “fire” can result in the user thinking the pistol is in a safe or fire position when it is not. Pulling the trigger with the safety in an intermediate position may cause the pistol to fire." Personally, I would carry the pistol with safety "on". I am used to operating a thumb safety; It's second nature to me. For others, it might take some practice to use.
Thanks for watching, and for your question. Yes, they would help dissipate heat from the barrel, in addition to lightening the slide a bit. That makes the cuts, at least, functional and just not eye candy.
Hello, Do you happen to know the trigger distance, from the trigger face to the back of the grip, by any chance? I can't find this info anywhere. Thanks
Thanks for taking the time to watch and for your question. By my measurement: From the face of the trigger (trigger safety in) to the rear of the grip is approximately 2 3/4-inches. I hope that helped.
Thanks for watching and commenting. It is, indeed, a very god pistol. I would like to spend more time with it at the range, but other firearms are calling to be reviewed. If I ever decided to carry the Security 380, you can bet that I would be spending a lot of time at the range with it.
Thanks for watching and your comment. The safety is on the left - for a right-handed shooter. An ambidextrous safety would have worked. The safety lever is, actually, a good design, just different from a rear-pivoting safety lever.
@@Mark-vg2yh Thanks for watching and for your question. Yes, it does shoot defensive rounds. Sig Sauer V-Crown 90-grain JHP, Underwood 90-grain 380+P, and Remington Ultimate Defense Compact Handgun 102-grain BLHP all cycled nicely through it.
Thanks for watching and for your question. The .380 is different from the .38 Special, although they are both within the 9mm family. In some cases, the .380 round can outperform the .38 Special, and which depends on too many factors to mention here. The .380 bullet is 0.355-inch in diameter; whereas, the .38 Special's diameter is 0.357. The .380 ACP is considered a 9mm short. The .38 Special could be considered as a .357 Magnum short, but it is never referred to as such. I hope that this helped somewhat?
your review was good until you went about the thumb safety, which is a GREAT feature, if use the safety, it is released like (most) every other safety, i.e. 1911. and if do not use the safety it does not engage unless you want it to. So, tacked-da-cool people bad mouth safeties. As a person who has been shooting for a while and used a 1911 for years I like a thumb safety.
Thanks for watching, and for your comment. I have no issues with thumb safeties - if they are easy to use. I have carried a 1911 since around 1970, and I am well-versed in their operation. The thumb safety on this pistol, as with some other pistols, while easy to disengage, takes a bit more effort to engage - and going safe is just as important as going to fire. Since the thumb safety pivots at the front rather than from the rear, this goes against the normal movement of the thumb. With the 1911, the thumb simply moves up to engage the safety. Like the Beretta 92/M9, manipulating the safety lever on this pistol takes a different approach to operate, but once one becomes familiar with it, it becomes easier to manipulate. No "Tacked-da-cool" person here, by the way, just an old fart who lives in the "Burbs."
Thanks for watching and for your question. According to Ruger, "The RUGER® SECURITY-380® pistol is compatible with standard factory ammunition loaded to U.S. Industry Standards, including hollow-point loads loaded in brass or aluminum cases. No 380 AUTO ammunition manufactured in accordance with NATO, U.S., SAAMI, or CIP standards is known to be beyond the design limits or known not to function in this pistol." In short, as long as the ammunition meets those standards, it would be fine. With that said, and for myself, I would simply move to the Ruger MAXX9 if I needed a more powerful cartridge.
@@johnfowler6189 Thanks for catching that. I must have missed it through my journey in the manual. Ruger, then, somewhat contradicts itself since +P is SAAMI rated. Interesting. Regardless, I see no need for +P ammunition. I would rather move to a pistol that would handle the next highest cartridge - the 9mm.
@@johnfowler6189 Thanks for catching that. I must have missed it through my journey in the manual. Ruger, then, somewhat contradicts itself since +P is SAAMI rated. Interesting. Regardless, I see no need for +P ammunition. I would rather move to a pistol that would handle the next highest cartridge - the 9mm.
@@RangeRoninChronicles The problem being there is no Saami rating for plus P in .380. Saami ratings are available online; too bad people don't take the time to look before asking questions.
Well, thanks for making the attempt. I am sure that there are other reviews of the Ruger Security 380 that would fit your fancy. The only time that I really bring up the music is during range sessions - to help muffle the noise of the muzzle blast somewhat. I would be happy to create a review of this pistol without music at all. Would you watch it?
Nice review.........not a lot of cutsie yak-yak. When this first came out I thought this is IDEAL for my old arthritic hands, as my LCP MAX is just a bit snappy, even though concealable, swappable mag release and NOW external safety.. But, .as usua, .recent Ruger models incorporate the new company motto: SCREW THE LEFTIES. The manual safety (and ruger REFUSES to sell a non manual safety model) is impossible The instruction manyal does NOT show how to swap the mag release, leading me to assume that, as usual.........THEY DIDN'T FIGURE IT IN. I should have known........as the 22 light rack kinda led the way in excluding lefties from their evermore customer base. ........guess I must stick with max........the last worth-a-shit small semi from what has, sadly, become of Bill's company.
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. I must agree that lefties are not figured into the equation as much as they need be. And, it's just not Ruger. From the ScienceAlert web site, I gleaned that only 10% of the population is left-handed. That, in itself, is not enough to make manufacturers make 'for lefties only' firearms, at least from a cost per benefit ratio. I find myself, because I am a right-hand shooter of handguns and a predominately left-handed shooter of long guns, having to adapt to bolts and safeties more than I like. But, I somehow adapt and conquer. Ambi safeties were a step in the right direction, but most right hand-shooters dislike them - and guess who the predominate customer-base is. At least Ruger, like Mossberg did with shotguns, placed the safety on some of their rifles centered on the tang so us left-handed shooters did not have to think too much about operating the safety.
Sorry I lost you. Sometimes, Wikipedia can be actually factual. Thanks for watching and commenting, though. I have a lot of review where I don't cite Wikipedia as a source.😁
![[UA] NAVI проти G2 Esports | Blast Premier Fall Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QWlIm4FGESQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I have added a link to the IWB holster that I have in the description.
As a retired law enforcement officer, I retired my 9mm in favor of the 380 because of concealment and weight. I have the Sig 365-380 (with 12 round magazines) and it is great for concealment in the year-round warm climate of Florida where one wears much lighter clothing (no jackets for concealment.) I know the 380 cartridge is not as effective as a 9mm, but I shoot a 380 much more accurately which translates into more hits on target. Now, with high-capacity magazines (15 rounds) of the Ruger Security 380 along with an affordable price, it is a winner. I purchased the Ruger Security 380 recently and it is simply wonderful to shoot. Concealment is more difficult than the Sig 365-380 but, it can be achieved. Both the Sig 365-380 and this Ruger Security 380 are excellent accurate soft shooting handguns worth consideration. I appreciate having more than one handgun of the same caliber, because it makes it easier for me to train and practice with consistency.
Thank you, sir, for watching and commenting. And thank you for your service; LEOs are much under appreciated these days. I am planning a part 2 to this review - after I get the rear sight adjusted and spend more time with it. Unfortunately, I spend more time reviewing firearms than I am able to work with firearms that I need to become intimately familiar with.
What holster do you use for the Security 380?
@@_cal_techie Thanks for watching, and for the question. Currently, I am using a holster from Muddy River Tactical (muddyrivertactical.com/product/inside-waistband-kydex-holster/). They have many options. I ordered mine in plain black without the claw attachment.
Lol 😆 you could just get a Springfield Armory Hellcat 9mm, holds 16+1 dum dum
@XSworn-EnemyX Yes, I could have, but if your reading comprehension must be poor as I explained
my position for adapting to a 380. Your opinion is noted.
A buddy of mine bought one for $313 taxes and background check and he’s in his mid seventies and he loves it. The easy rack is awesome. I like the trigger and manual safety’s. Don’t like grip safety’s so this weapon is great. Good video, and Ruger did a fantastic job on this weapon.
Thanks for watching and commenting. Both mean a great deal to me. I also like the Security 380 for all the reasons you stated. I think that you can stick a fork in this one, it's well done! 😁
........unless you are a leftie. Then it's: "screw you".
I'm a lefty and I love mine!
I love this gun. I bought it several months ago and I have over 500 rounds through mine. I love the lite rack system and it shoots great! I use a Kydex inside the waistband holster from Muddy River Tactical. I’m very pleased with the holster also.
Thanks for watching and commenting. The Security 380 is a pleasure to shoot. I just need more time with it to see if the sights are off - or me. It's probably me!
I love mine so much, I purchased two of them. Installed a Viridian CGL green laser/light on one for home defense, MTR custom holster from Gunners Alley. Always in my range bag, my sister loves her also. She can easily rack it even with limited hand strength. Ruger hit one out of the park with this piece.
Sorry, I missed your comment the first go...trying to catch up on the comment. Very happy that you watch and commented. Yes, I think that Ruger did a fine job with this one.
I a new subscriber to your channel. I am very pleased in your review and testing of the products ect. Thank you from an old guy in Connecticut.
Thank you very much for watching, commenting, and especially subscribing.😁 These things help keep the channel going and growing. From an old guy in Georgia.
high quality production . thanks 4 this
Thanks for watching and for the kind words. I appreciate it.
Due to arthritis, carpel tunnel, old eyes etc. just bought one $135 out the door with cabellas gift cards, mil discount and club points. Like it so far.
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. I hope that you enjoy it for a long time.
I hear Ruger Security 9 compact holster works, also the Ruger security 9 holsters. Also, nearly all reviews agree that the slide release is junk. Thank you for such a thorough review.
Thanks for watching and commenting. I'll check in with Ruger to verify. The IWB holster from Muddy River Tactical (muddyrivertactical.com/product/inside-waistband-kydex-holster/) is doing an excellent job so far - and it is made for the pistol - no second guessing. I may do a quick review of it, since it might interest people who have or are considering the Security 380.
Yup, Security 9 compact holster is a fit.
@@ElDiabloLocoPoco Good to know! Thanks for the information,
The 380 ACP when housed in this formst , becomes capable of faster and more accurate follow up shots. For any shooter. The pistol is pleasant to shoot, which becomes more range time.I have found the Ruger Security 380 always finds its way in the range bag.
Another plus of the 380 is less report .. especially if having to be fired indoors. Loud cartridges fired indoors for defensive purposes ( no time for hearing protection) can cause disorientation and much discomfort. I mever use +P anything in any of my pistols. I have found the XTP 90gr bullet to function consistently well in 380acp.
Thanks for taking the time out to watch and comment. Like you, I do not run +P ammunition in any of my pistols. Revolvers rated for +P or magnum ammunition are a different story. And, by the way, Happy thanksgiving to you and yours!
I just ordered a two pack from Gunmag warehouse. They have both 10 rnd and 15 rnd magazines.
Good to know, and thanks for watching! I'll have to check that out.
I have tendon damage in fingers and wrists and this gun fit the bill perfectly esp with a price of $280!
Thanks for watching and for your comment. While I don't have tendon issues, I do want to save what tendons I do have. This pistol is a welcome relief after handling and firing pistols that are not so friendly to the hands.
Just ordered one,I always carried a commander,but had cancer in my wrist.
The commander still sits by my night table,but I’ll carry this one.
I shoot fairly well,and believe I’ll be fine carrying one
@@smacksmack5976 good luck to you, it sucked having to downsize lol but can't handle recoil no more, anything beats a sharp stick tho lol
Very nice review. Thank you. Subscribed
Thank you for taking the time to watch the video, comment, and especially subscribing. I hope to keep bring quality reviews to the table on a number of firearms and I hope that you can travel this journey with me. Have a great day!
Nice review. I bought this gun a few weeks ago and it's a really nice gun comfortable in the hands and will be my conceal carry. Finding a holster was interesting but found one that will arrive in a few weeks from "moms who carry" and that one will work with the Enigma carry system too. The only downfall for security 380 is that we leftys cant change the mag release to the left side but that's a minor thing
Thanks for watching and commenting. I do like the Ruger Security 380, and getting used to the thumb safety does takes some practice, but is doable. It's a soft shooter and has performed without fail (so far). Be sure to check out my review of the new Glock G28 - a .380 ACP the size of a Glock G26.
Great review
Thank you. I really appreciate that. And I appreciate you subscribing.
I bought one of these a couple of weeks ago. There is a lot of features on this gun for the $300 retail price.
I have had a LCP for years and also bought an LCP Max recently, which will still be my pocket-carry gun.
I had been wanting to move to a .380 for my EDC for a while, due to arthritis getting worse in my hands and wrists. While the LCP Max is great for pocket carry, I simply do not shoot it well enough for it to be my primary gun. This Security .380 gives more size for easier shooting and only minor recoil. It allows me to rapidly place all shots in a 3" circle at 7 yards. - No, it is not a bullseye shooter, but it does what it is meant to do.
With a .380 from this length barrel, you will only give up about 2" of penetration compared to a 9mm and only loose about 1/18"-3/16" expansion. I will gladly give up both of those stats to be able to put multiple shots on target very rapidly.
It will be tough to pull my Walther PDP-F off my EDC belt, but overall, I think the Ruger gives me a better chance if I have to swap more than harsh words with someone.
Thanks for watching my review of the Ruger Security 380, and especially commenting about the pistol. I do like the size of the pistol, as it fits in my hand better than some of the .380 ACP pistols that I own. As you mention, a better fit in the hand means better control of the firearm. I think that Ruger did it right with this pistol. I have no complaints. As far as accuracy, I find that most all firearms are more accurate than I can make them. As is said, "Beware of the man who only owns one gun" and that is a truism. As I review different firearms, pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, etc., getting truly proficient with just one is a challenge - but a 1911 comes the closest for me.
I just purchased this firearm for my wife. 299$ is a steal, and i think she will be really happy with this gun.
Thanks for watching and commenting. I have found that if you can keep the wifey happy... I think that she will like this.
the heavy trigger is what is causing most ppl to complain about it shooting low. it has a 5# which makes your average plinker tend to shoot low. i plan to replaces 2 springs to take it down to 2.5 - 3#
Thanks for watching and commenting. Sounds like a plan to me, especially for one who would be shooting it often.
According to the Owner's Manual this pistol is compatible with the Security-9 accessories. I can vouch for the Security-9 R&R Kydex holster, both OWB and IWB, working with the Security-380.
Thanks for watching and commenting. It is appreciated. Good to know information.
Great review - thanks!
You are very welcome. Thanks for watching and commenting.
Got mine 3 months ago, still haven't fired it at the range yet lol 😆. Also Ruger SFAR and about 3 other pistols, waiting for warm weather to spend the day at the Range!
Thanks for watching. It sounds as if you will have a busy range day.
Something interesting, Ruger had an LC 380 several years ago that was probably very similar, never had one, so I can't say for sure, but it apparently didn't sell , so it was discontinued.( I believe).
Thanks for watching and for your comment. The Ruger LC 380 is still available at the Ruger website, thus still being sold. It looks like it would be a good DA pistol for pocket carry. It has, though, a lot of competition.
The 10rd are available in Massachusetts. You get 3 mags with the gun
Thanks for watching and for your comment. Good to know information.
Well done.
If you're going to write captions you should ensure that they are big enough to read
Thanks for commenting. The font size varies but is usually the minimum of 24-point, but most captions are in a larger point size, which should be fine when folks are viewing on a monitor and not a cell phone.
Is the rugar security 380 actually a scaled up version of the lcp2 or lcp max. Can it be carried without the safety on, as the lcp2 without a safety. Just wondering?
Thanks for watching and for your questions. To answer the first, I suppose it could be considered as a scaled up version of the LCP. I do know that it fits my hand better then the LCP. To the second, yes it could be carried with the safety off.
From Ruger, we have the following: "The safety should be in its “safe” position at all times except when the user is deliberately positioned to fire at a selected target. When the safety is in the “fire” position (safety lever down) the red oval is exposed just above the safety lever." There is also a warning not to place the safety lever midway: "Placing the safety in an intermediate position between “safe” and “fire” can result in the user thinking the pistol is in a safe or fire position when it is not. Pulling the trigger with the safety in an intermediate position may cause the pistol to fire."
Personally, I would carry the pistol with safety "on". I am used to operating a thumb safety; It's second nature to me. For others, it might take some practice to use.
I have to wonder if the cuts in the slide would aid in keeping the barrel cooler 🤔 I actually like it.
Thanks for watching, and for your question. Yes, they would help dissipate heat from the barrel, in addition to lightening the slide a bit. That makes the cuts, at least, functional and just not eye candy.
❤❤❤
Thank you for watching and your kind comment.
Hello,
Do you happen to know the trigger distance, from the trigger face to the back of the grip, by any chance? I can't find this info anywhere. Thanks
Thanks for taking the time to watch and for your question. By my measurement: From the face of the trigger (trigger safety in) to the rear of the grip is approximately 2 3/4-inches. I hope that helped.
Like mine
Thanks for watching and commenting. It is, indeed, a very god pistol. I would like to spend more time with it at the range, but other firearms are calling to be reviewed. If I ever decided to carry the Security 380, you can bet that I would be spending a lot of time at the range with it.
I think ruger made the safety lock for lefties
Thanks for watching and your comment. The safety is on the left - for a right-handed shooter. An ambidextrous safety would have worked. The safety lever is, actually, a good design, just different from a rear-pivoting safety lever.
Anyone know if the gun will shoot defensive rounds,
@@Mark-vg2yh Thanks for watching and for your question. Yes, it does shoot defensive rounds. Sig Sauer V-Crown 90-grain JHP, Underwood 90-grain 380+P, and Remington Ultimate Defense Compact Handgun 102-grain BLHP all cycled nicely through it.
I’m new at handguns and wondering what is if any the difference between a 380 round and a 38? Or are they the same?
Thanks for watching and for your question. The .380 is different from the .38 Special, although they are both within the 9mm family. In some cases, the .380 round can outperform the .38 Special, and which depends on too many factors to mention here. The .380 bullet is 0.355-inch in diameter; whereas, the .38 Special's diameter is 0.357.
The .380 ACP is considered a 9mm short. The .38 Special could be considered as a .357 Magnum short, but it is never referred to as such.
I hope that this helped somewhat?
@@RangeRoninChronicles thnx for the clarification.. appreciate the clarification and your response
your review was good until you went about the thumb safety, which is a GREAT feature, if use the safety, it is released like (most) every other safety, i.e. 1911. and if do not use the safety it does not engage unless you want it to. So, tacked-da-cool people bad mouth safeties. As a person who has been shooting for a while and used a 1911 for years I like a thumb safety.
Thanks for watching, and for your comment. I have no issues with thumb safeties - if they are easy to use. I have carried a 1911 since around 1970, and I am well-versed in their operation. The thumb safety on this pistol, as with some other pistols, while easy to disengage, takes a bit more effort to engage - and going safe is just as important as going to fire. Since the thumb safety pivots at the front rather than from the rear, this goes against the normal movement of the thumb. With the 1911, the thumb simply moves up to engage the safety. Like the Beretta 92/M9, manipulating the safety lever on this pistol takes a different approach to operate, but once one becomes familiar with it, it becomes easier to manipulate. No "Tacked-da-cool" person here, by the way, just an old fart who lives in the "Burbs."
1:44
Can you shoot +P ammo in this?
Thanks for watching and for your question. According to Ruger, "The RUGER® SECURITY-380® pistol is compatible with standard factory ammunition loaded to U.S. Industry Standards, including hollow-point loads loaded in brass or aluminum cases. No 380 AUTO ammunition manufactured in accordance with NATO, U.S., SAAMI, or CIP standards is known to be beyond the design limits or known not to function in this pistol." In short, as long as the ammunition meets those standards, it would be fine.
With that said, and for myself, I would simply move to the Ruger MAXX9 if I needed a more powerful cartridge.
Page 12 of the instruction manual, in red print, states " Do not use"+P" ammunition"
@@johnfowler6189 Thanks for catching that. I must have missed it through my journey in the manual. Ruger, then, somewhat contradicts itself since +P is SAAMI rated. Interesting.
Regardless, I see no need for +P ammunition. I would rather move to a pistol that would handle the next highest cartridge - the 9mm.
@@johnfowler6189 Thanks for catching that. I must have missed it through my journey in the manual. Ruger, then, somewhat contradicts itself since +P is SAAMI rated. Interesting.
Regardless, I see no need for +P ammunition. I would rather move to a pistol that would handle the next highest cartridge - the 9mm.
@@RangeRoninChronicles The problem being there is no Saami rating for plus P in .380. Saami ratings are available online; too bad people don't take the time to look before asking questions.
I tried to watch this, but the overly loud, and entirely unnecessary, music became unbearable.
Well, thanks for making the attempt. I am sure that there are other reviews of the Ruger Security 380 that would fit your fancy. The only time that I really bring up the music is during range sessions - to help muffle the noise of the muzzle blast somewhat. I would be happy to create a review of this pistol without music at all. Would you watch it?
@@RangeRoninChronicles -- Since I am seriously thinking of getting one of these pistols, I would gladly watch your music-free review.
@@gregb6469 I will do that for you. Stay tuned. It will be released tomorrow (07/06/2023)
Nice review.........not a lot of cutsie yak-yak.
When this first came out I thought this is IDEAL for my old arthritic hands, as my LCP MAX is just a bit snappy, even though concealable, swappable mag release and NOW external safety..
But, .as usua, .recent Ruger models incorporate the new company motto: SCREW THE LEFTIES.
The manual safety (and ruger REFUSES to sell a non manual safety model) is impossible
The instruction manyal does NOT show how to swap the mag release, leading me to assume that, as usual.........THEY DIDN'T FIGURE IT IN.
I should have known........as the 22 light rack kinda led the way in excluding lefties from their evermore customer base.
........guess I must stick with max........the last worth-a-shit small semi from what has, sadly, become of Bill's company.
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. I must agree that lefties are not figured into the equation as much as they need be. And, it's just not Ruger. From the ScienceAlert web site, I gleaned that only 10% of the population is left-handed. That, in itself, is not enough to make manufacturers make 'for lefties only' firearms, at least from a cost per benefit ratio. I find myself, because I am a right-hand shooter of handguns and a predominately left-handed shooter of long guns, having to adapt to bolts and safeties more than I like. But, I somehow adapt and conquer. Ambi safeties were a step in the right direction, but most right hand-shooters dislike them - and guess who the predominate customer-base is. At least Ruger, like Mossberg did with shotguns, placed the safety on some of their rifles centered on the tang so us left-handed shooters did not have to think too much about operating the safety.
Lost me when you cited Wikipedia as a reference.
Sorry I lost you. Sometimes, Wikipedia can be actually factual. Thanks for watching and commenting, though. I have a lot of review where I don't cite Wikipedia as a source.😁
👉
Thanks for watching and commenting.