One answer to the people who say "how can this be efficient using so much power?". The amount of power they have to bring in, is not relevant. If you replace 1 million trucks, you need power for 1 million trucks. If you replace one, you need power for one. The real question is: how much more efficiënt are they? A diesel truck does 6,5 miles on a gallon. A gallon is around 3.785 liters of fuel. A mile is around 1.609km. So, that translates to 3.785 liters of fuel on 10,46km or 2.76 km on 1 liters of fuel. There is around 10kWh of energy stored in 1 liter of diesel fuel. So 1km of driving a semitruck takes around 3,62kWh of energy. The energy needed to produce diesel is not taken into account in this number. A Tesla Semi uses up to 2kWh per mile, or 1.24kWh per kilometer. So the efficiency of a Tesla Semi is 3.62 / 1.24 = 2.92 times higher than a diesel semi truck. In other words: it takes almost 3x the amount of energy to move a diesel compared to an EV semi. And a truck that uses less energy, is cheaper to operate. If companies start buying these EV semi trucks, it's not because they like to save the planet. It's because they save 2 to 3 times the cost on fuel, every day, every year for every semi truck.
Bit the truck is way more expensive,plus charged needed,and battery life,in commercial service,unknown.Then,very few EV s seem to live up to makers claims.
@@keithhooper6123 Until we know any of the numbers we really can't make valid claim for or against EVs. If a company is doing the shift to EV it's likely worth it. Gotta please the bean counters.
Add to these stats a vastly reduced maintenance schedule and resultant costs. Brakes last and last, no engine fluids (well, coolant..) and future battery reconditioning advancements will make electric more and more attractive. Range will improve as more resources are directed at the sector.
Yes also how much cheaper is it than running diesel. How much cheaper are the electric trucks vs diesel trucks. I think at the end of the day its not cheap at all, because everything is expensive these days. No numbers spoken at all vs the oposite "diesel", that should tell you something that the whole thing is s scam in the end.
@rearspeaker6364 Well, even if that's true, and it's less true every year, burning diesel is a horribly wasteful way to make a vehicle move. Generating electricity with the diesel and then running a vehicle on it would still be over 30% more efficient thanks to the larger scale of the generators. That gives you an idea of the inefficiency of internal combustion engines.
Pepsico stated, "at a rate of $0.14 per kWh, the off-peak rate in Sacramento - this would result in a 23% fuel cost reduction over the most efficient diesel trucks." I don't know why everyone keeps missing that point.
That seems to be the key to success: the user's own customized recharging system. The "out of service" disease among public recharging sites is unacceptable.
“We run everything on Solar” … Next sentence “we had to bring in 3MW for this project” lol 🤦🏽♂️… How much are 3MW? 3,000,000 watts! The best solar panels make 450W… that means at least 7-8000 solarpanels only for 3MW… they don’t even have 1000 solar panels on their roof. That’s not even enough to Run the AC for that facility size… 2023 people are stupid!!!
@@freedomisnotnegotiable 3MW is the max service capacity, not the power they use at all times. Just like your house having a 200A service panel, but you don't use 44kW 24/7. They can also contract solar generation as source of their electricity so don't have to generate everything on-site with the panels shown in the video. Maybe learn a little about the subject before calling people stupid? Otherwise you just look, well, stupid.
You are also putting all the eggs in the same basket as you have that proprietary charging solution in your yard. Tesla Gigacharger (as they call it) has a very wonky plug, which can be used only with Tesla Semis. So these cannot be charged "in the wild", anyways. Not even with Tesla Superchargers.
Fantastic overview! It shows that Pepsi put a lot of work into this move to Tesla trucks, and continues to put in a lot of work to monitor the operation to understand it's efficiency and to optimize it. This is a big experiment for them. On the one hand I'm very impressed, on the other I'm a bit dismayed that the move to electric trucks took 3 years and so many smart people working on it.
Probably the same thermal management system as you'd find in a Tesla car. They're doing just fine. 15-20% less range probably. It's really minor thanks to the heat pump system recovering heat from motors, batteries, computers, ...
Would like you to make a video where we follow a driver and you have to let the driver talk freely about his experience of this apparently super semi. Also feel free to talk about range and load quantities etc.
@@straighttalk2069 No, I don't expect that, but I would love for one of their drivers to talk about his experiences in a really deep way. Skeptical at the start, but now convinced that electricity is the way forward for that industry as well
Thanks for the upload. That gal sure can spin the corporate speak. I see they went BYD for their yard mules. I wonder how that's working out. Didn't see any Nikola Motors trucks. They're selling a pretty slick cabover with all the usual EV bells and whistles with pretty decent specs for an electric semi. They're also running them local and regional. It'll be interesting to see how the batteries do with relatively deep discharges and fast recharging. The facility power requirements are really something. They'll need to run a lot more dedicated circuits to expand. Depending on the charge schedule, they'll also need some serious upgrades to be 100% solar powered charging. We'll have to keep an eye on how this test works out.
With price reduction in batteries and renewables the transition will be quite rapid. I drive a 1 tonne van and running cost reduction has been the biggest change
750kW is some impressive charging power! When Tesla brings the Semi to Europe I might consider changing employer and join the team.... I believe it will take the market by storm. Good job Pepsi for leading the way👏👏👏
The problem is these vehicles only work in warm climates like California, not places like the Midwest, Just ask the bus companies that purchased electric buses. They can only go a few blocks before needing a recharge
@@petebusch9069they never even talked real number vs the two trucks electric and diesel. It's all a scam, people just fall for it. I tell everyone that tesla run on coal and natural gas, cause thats what electricity comes from, so they actually havent solved the emmisions that goes in the air that they keep crying about. What a scam.
@@petebusch9069 i mean yeah batteries require mining and a lot of resources to product, but we need to mine more not less. we are a growing society and with that more resources are needed. This is less an environmental play and more a financial one, these trucks are 3x more efficient while having less parts to maintain.
Yet they never have once mentioned real numbers between the electric truck and diesel truck. Its all a scam, and then when the whole grid falls they'll blaming it on something else, then they'll try to replace electric cars.
As a class one truck driver I am still looking for a Tesla tractor unit in a video where they show even just the back of a tractor unit let alone the coupling and un coupling of the trailer airlines .
@@petebusch9069many of us don’t care about the environment. Global warming is a myth. More EVs mean increased demand for coal and natural gases being used to supply electricity for EVs. It’s a win-win for everyone.
@@The-Cat I dunno.. we will see where trends go right? The issue with hydrogen is.. its explosive as hell.. and because of that.. the biggest challenge is safely storing it.. and creating a storage solutions within the truck that wont easily puncture etc etc
@@The-Catand hydrogen is unsustainable for the simple fact that creating 0-emissions H2 is extremely costly. Currently over 90% of all hydrogen gas produced is made using fossil fuel, which creates CO2 and completely defeats the purpose of using hydrogen in the first place. By the time hydrogen technology & infrastructure advances enough to make it useful for fleets, battery electric technology will have advanced as well.
@@claytonbrown7100 _Full load as in >40,000lbs in the box?_ The flatbed towed by a Tesla Semi, accelerating rapidly up a steep slope on Donner Pass, passing a diesel semi as if it were standing still, here: ua-cam.com/video/LtOqU2o81iI/v-deo.htmlfeature=share&t=985, was loaded with about 44,000 lbs. of concrete highway barriers. The dry van trailer towed by a Tesla Semi which drove 500 miles from Fremont, CA to San Diego, CA on 93% battery charge, including climbing and descending the 4,200 ft. Tejon Pass ("The Grapevine"), here: ua-cam.com/video/GtgaYEh-qSk/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Tesla, was loaded with about 42,000 lbs. of pallets. So, yes.
I know here in central Wisconsin Pepsi has no near term use for EVs. We just don’t have the charging infrastructure in place yet. Plus most roads are 2 lane blacktop or gravel/sand/dirt roads
So the Pepsi plant needs its own electric service...then the concrete plant down the road needs a new substation for their concrete trucks....then the garbage truck terminal needs a new substation for their trucks.....then the LTL terminal needs a new substation for all their trucks.....then the nearby truck stop needs a substation to charge all their trucks.....it's the Oprah Winfrey show. You get a substation, and you get a substation. Everybody gets a substation. The substation fairy will leave a brand new substation under your pillow if you're a good boy and finish your vegetables.
@@havenzhai5187 A 50x100 meter solar panel roof delivers about 0,5kWh/m2. 5000m2 delivers 2500kWh per day, you can full charge 3 trucks of 850kWh for free or 6 trucks 50%. It is a good deal. You only have to asses if you deliver excess power back to the grid or store it in a battery or spare truck. That's why you need a specialist like Tesla and grid company to figure out the best option.
@@s0012823 Where are they going to park that many solar panels? And how many trucks do they have? What happens when the sun doesn’t shine for a week? And lastly, who is going to pay for all that? The taxpayers should not have to shoulder any of that. By your math, if you 27 trucks, you would have to have 10 acres of solar panels. Do you honestly think that is reasonable?
These anti EV folks keep forgetting our own history…we wanted cars, the government built highways. We wanted airplanes, the government financed and built airports… what makes anyone believe that fossil fuels are also not heavily subsidized by our tax $$$, it is. Nothing turns whether old or new tech without substantial government grease…
This needs quite significant infrastructure investment. That charger depot costs about $10 million including new sturdy electric supply lines. But as it is currently covered by 50% federal subsidies, the deal is easy to make. Did I understand correctly, that Pepsico or Tesla do not own the charging depot, but it is owned by a third party? It is also interesting to see, how fast the effective range is beaten out from those traction batteries when the charge cycles seem to be regularly 5% to 95%. That might end up spiking up Tesla's warranty costs, unless there is a clause for less than 18 months durability with 70% range left (or similar) on the contract.
Hello Autoselectronics; yes potentially one $200,000 charger could serve more than one Tesla Semi; but there are two problems. #1. If you attempt to share it at the same time; then the charge time doubles because you are splitting the power. #2 1 Truck =12 Ys, 2 trucks 24 Ys etc. Not many local grids can charge 12 or 24 Ys at once. Even in industrial areas with heavy duty grids you can't do more than a couple Semi's at once. So you have to schedule them one after the other. That could cause a line and delays; or it could mean you are constantly charging losing potential billing hours. Pepsi unlike a trucking company could possibly charge a number of trucks during the night; a trucking company has keep on trucking 24 hours.
@@rogerstarkey5390you don't understand how trucking works it still would take way too long to charge, many long haul loads are set appointments you can't be taking hours to charge...
the time to charge one of these trucks is only 25 mins from 5% to 95%,this all in managing your fleet up or down time, scheduling is all in your company business plan and strategy, where i work we have 100 electric forklifts and we run 24/7 and have to charge these when needed and it all works out in logistics, planning , trucking companies with diesel fleets have no better turn around time than Pepsi on average it is slower, been in the industry 40 yrs and seen the data for all across North America, its gotten better and is improving every year, it comes down to the owners of the business, are they looking ahead to future proof themselves/business to provide the customer with a reliable service product or be left behind, sure long haul, diesel is still king, these Tesla trucks are in the infancy stage and are seeing decent results and everyone has to crawl before they walk and they're walking pretty darn fast out of the gate I'd say , the barrier here is the human part mostly, not the technology part of this equation, it'll still take years until all this comes to the top, it all has no history or established data yet, lineage doesn't come overnight, nothing does, time will tell and if companies don't build in obsolescence in their BEV's this all could be a great thing in the future, time will tell
Driving a truck for a junk food company is not for a trucking company. A trucking firm makes a its living shipping and moving things. Pepsi is a company who's profits have little or nothing to do with moving their products around and is centered in this case in producing and distrubuting junk food; a very profitable business with very little positive consumer relations of late. So burning some money on 21 green EV trucks is called public relations Pepsi is green! Cool EV trucks!
Pepsi, Coke and Nestle were named the top plastic pollutants, hope Pepsi comes up with environmentally friendly bottles and not pollute oceans with plastic garbage
@@treborsirrah7916 wrong but they do catch fire; only about 100 are in private hands and 1 already caught fire and blocked I-80 for 16 hours.. Insurance will kill BEVs.
@@treborsirrah7916 Perhaps for short haul but I am talking about trucking - long haul. Who pays for maintenance during the warranty period? What they pay for for real is wasted time and interuptions in function. Tesla Semi has had a total of only 100 trucks in civilian hands; already one has burned up and blocked highway I-80 for 16 hours while it burned. Wouldn't it be a great word if there were 100,000 of these electric trucks blocking 3 highways ever day for 16 hours.
OH PEPSI is a trucking company - so says LANEC. From Microtrends "PepsiCo, Inc. is the manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of grain-based snack foods, beverages, and other products. It's driven by a complementary food and beverage portfolio that includes Frito-Lay, Gatorade, Pepsi-Cola, Quaker and Tropicana. PepsiCo's product portfolio includes a wide range of enjoyable foods and beverages.' Gee funny they don't mention trucking revenues LANEC. There are none.
Time will tell all. Let's see how the big scale goes. Hopefully good. Next thing will be Pepsi goes out of business. Activists will push to end soda products after renewable are used.
Mountainous terrain is where the Tesla Semi has the greatest advantage over diesel semis; first, because they have 2-3 times the HP of diesel semis, allowing them to climb steep grades at highway speeds; second because regenerative braking removes almost all of the fuel penalties for steep climbs and descents; and third, because there's no loss of power at high altitudes, and in fact slightly better economy due to less air resistance. You can see a graphic example of this in the 500 mile range test, with a payload of around 43,000 lbs., climbing and descending the 4,200 ft. Tejon Pass ("The Grapevine") with almost no loss of range compared to running on level roads, here: ua-cam.com/video/LtOqU2o81iI/v-deo.htmlfeature=share&t=1221.
Nice trucks, but if correct, these Tesla Trucks they DONT have sleepers built ito them, meaning that if a driver does one of those 450 mile drives, and if he wants to get some rest, he has to to to get some sleep while sitting in that drivers seat, right? Is the Tesla Semi a sleeper cab? It does not, however, have any sleeping arrangements for the driver. It's strictly a day cab configuration, meaning it's not suited for trips that take multiple days. Tesla's Semi is impressive in many different ways.
Someone FINALLY placed the driver in the CENTER, for safety and VISIBILITY. Took 120 years to do like a lot of race cars do. Even NASCAR, the seat is more toward the center, and the chromoly cage bows out from the driver, for more crush space.
i love how they consider 400 miles long range. Id love to see them somehow charge up in less than 3 hours on random chargers on the road. I doubt they have enough fast chargers anywhere to charge these trucks
The reason that diesel itself doesn't catch fire is it is not flamable at normal temprature and pressure. it isn't any more flamable than your cooking oil which usually can be used in place of diesel. A lithium battery can catch fire doing nothing. As for this italian accident - lets find the link; because diesel on a road shouldn't be able to catch fire; Perhaps it was gasoline. The mechanics of "two trucks crashing" means only one would need to have gasoline or another ignitable fuel on board. There are some diesel engine fires. diesel will burn under pressure, but all diesels have a fuel cut off to stop fuel going to the engine which puts out the fire. These are always due to improper use of the engine; so on a rare occasion some bad driver will not be in the truck when the first starts; and the fire can keep going. I am talking two trucks under proper operation by licensed drivers - a lithium truck can catch on fire and not be put out. A Diesel will not catch fire.
They get it for free from Tesla so that they will advertise it on roads and it is for short distances because it will be hard to find special charges for them everywhere !!
A kilowatt is 1,000Watt, a megawatt is 1,000,000 Watt. A modern house in Europe will have around a 17,250 Watt watt connection, so a 3 Megawatt connection is about 174 connections for modern homes. That seems like a lot but on an industrial scale it's very small. A modern EPR nuclear reactor can deliver around 1,650 megawatts.
Wow 3MW. 😮 Imagine being a utility trying to balance loads like that for just one customer. Like a suburb's worth of power for one customer. A customer would want to set up grid frequency stabilisation systems with this kind of supply, like virtual power plant set up to offer back to the grid for a fee. In the long term, multiple customers would need to order that kind of power. I keep thinking 1.21 gigawatt!
Pepsi, keep this in mind, at the end of the day,the people made your company,if you push for electric for the whole trucking industry,don’t forget what happened to Budweiser, the people buy your product,not your customers
Wait, so they need to unload every time they need to charge? I guess for now, EV trucks are limited to specific tasks, not bad since most are not so demanding, although city trucks is what we need more than semi trucks.
i think the reason is that they mostly charge at night when they would be unloaded anyways and they run the whole day on one charge maybe you could install chargers at the unloading docks as well just topping off a bit while you standing there anyways
@@terrya6486 The maximum allowed weight of a fully laden electric semi is 82000 so you are saying the truck and trailer weighed around 4000 pounds? Really? The weight you quoted was probably the total weight , not the “cargo weight” which, even after all this time, Tesla have still not released which is a bit suspicious.
@@tatata1543 Your correct it was seventy eight thousand total pounds. There is a full length video of the entire drive. Is from fremont california to san diego california. The truck is fully capable of it. And pepsico in sacramento put a thousand seventy eight miles on one of those trucks in twenty four hours using three drivers. But that's not what it's really for. There's a Tesla semi, it runs from Modesto, California to Oakhurst, California. Every day and I got to see a few days a week. Saving more than six hundred dollars a day in fuel. The being counters are beside themselves the amount of profit that is is astounding.
It doesn't matter much at this early stage. They'll be used where it makes the most economic sense. Most trucks are cubed out with a full trailer and not near the weight limit. As it all develops over the next 25 years they will slowly improve, as will the ROI.
@@davidmccarthy6061 It doesn’t matter to you but maybe the people paying for them might not agree . If a diesel rig can carry a lot more than an EV rig it will be much more cost effective (and probably much cheaper to buy the diesel rig). I’m far from convinced EV semis are a viable proposition for the industry. My suspicion is that Tesla aren’t saying because the capacity is so much smaller that it impacts its attraction as an investment. The fact they haven’t said after more than a year lends weight to that theory.
The solar panels still produce a few milliwatts (combined total) from the sunlight reflected from the moon (depending of course on how clear of a night it is, moon phase, and position in the sky at any point in the night), fireflies, aircraft flying over, and possibly nearby street lamps which are getting their power from the grid. Just kidding. I mean maybe they do still produce some amount of negligible power at night but I just made that up. Full disclosure: I’m drinking cherry coke right now.
Just kidding about drinking cherry coke as well. I’m just trying to be funny but turned out to be flat out stupid. I’m sorry to have wasted your time, or entertained you, whichever it ended up being.
@@urbanteckwe currently don’t have the battery tech to support that unfortunately. i believe the way it works is the daytime solar gets redistributed to the grid and in return they receive credits which they use to pull from the grid at the night. but idk that’s an assumption.
In one of the overhead yard shots you can see the Tesla battery banks next to the charging stations. Re-charge at night at a lower rate, and use to charge during the day. If you can hook up with solar, you have free energy cost.(Less the cost of the installation). This is being done all over North America by the prime power suppliers to replace what are called Peak Power Stations which are used to add power to peak demand times, at a fraction of the cost of gas plants, plus no on-site employees are require to run them.
Nobody cares about the environment. It’s great that more batteries are being produced and it’s also great that more coal/natural gas are being used to generate the increase demand of electricity. The coal/natural gas companies get more money and customers from the increased demands and EV owners get their electricity. It’s a win-win.
amazon trucks typically run long distances, from facility to facility or state to state, which would not work due to a lack of infrastructure to support that. these local Pepsico trucks work because they always return to a home base to charge. Amazon has done last mile delivery electric already which works the same as the delivery vehicle returns back to a delivery center where there would be charging infrastructure
They had to bring in 3megawatts of power? So you have to bring in the equivalent to a towns worth of power just to support a few electric trucks and forklifts? How can that be efficient? Where does that power get sourced from? how much more emissions could be generated if from traditional gas or fossil fuel power plants?
The amount of power they have to bring in, is not relevant. If you replace 1 million trucks, you need power for 1 million trucks. If you replace one, you need power for one. The real question is: how much more efficiënt are they? A diesel truck does 6,5 miles on a gallon. A gallon is around 3.785 liters of fuel. A mile is around 1.609km. So, that translates to 3.785 liters of fuel on 10,46km or 2.76 km on 1 liters of fuel. There is around 10kWh of energy stored in 1 liter of diesel fuel. So 1km of driving a semitruck takes around 3,62kWh of energy. The energy needed to produce diesel is not taken into account in this number. A Tesla Semi uses up to 2kWh per mile, or 1.24kWh per kilometer. So the efficiency of a Tesla Semi is 3.62 / 1.24 = 2.92 times higher than a diesel semi truck. In other words: it takes almost 3x the amount of energy to move a diesel compared to an EV semi.
@@apocalypto559 Nobody calculates accumulated time savings on a journey. If there's let's say 10 miles uphill during a day. If this truck holds at least 60mph average on those sections and a conventional truck is at 30, just that puts the Tesla 10 minutes ahead. Same applies downhill, with better control, more speed and Regen adding to range, reducing charge time (if required)
It won't haul 46,000 lbs. But here's a video of a Tesla Semi, pulling a flatbed loaded with 44,000 lbs. of concrete highway barriers, accelerating *rapidly* up a steep grade on Donner Pass (watch the speedometer), and passing a diesel semi as if it were standing still: ua-cam.com/video/LtOqU2o81iI/v-deo.htmlfeature=share&t=985.
They only carry chips for the longer runs and maybe sodas a short distance. A fully laden soda truck is heavy and knocks down the battery fast depending on the terrain.
So will they put TA/Petro, Loves, Pilot/Flying J out of business? I understand they will have super chargers for these vehicles over the road but I don’t see how this brings down cost. Trucks break and with breakdown being unknown how will the companies compensate for that? Still interesting truck though
"Trucks break".... Consider this. Drive failure on a diesel? The truck stops. 1 motor fails on this truck? That motor disengages, the truck compensates (still with better performance) informs the driver. Within a minute or so, the driver gets a call from the local Tesla service (flagged by the truck) who advise that it needs a unit. They ask the driver where his planned overnight stop will be and his ETA. A mobile unit meets the driver at the location and the drive is replaced. Alternatively, if it's a light load, the driver can continue to a more convenient location, finishing the job. . Minimum downtime.
@@rogerstarkey5390 I see your point but one thing you are neglecting is parts shortage. Currently peterbilts, freightliners, Volvos, Mack’s all are on parts shortage. If every truck were to be Tesla you think Tesla could compensate for the part right away?
Frankly, being new/old tech (evs have been around for over 100 years) its hard to tell what total cost of ownership will be, their testing this stuff to see its viability. Same thing happened when motorized trucks took over from horse and buggie. The maintenance tho is supposed to be better, and given the simpler system (comparatively) the failures should be fewer and far between meaning that once bugs are worked out they should be rather solid. As for parts shortages, yes that will cause issues, but then again, a short part is a short part, doesn't matter if its diesel or EV. This stuff will happen, we can play the game of what if all we want but the only way to make this tech work is if people buy into it, show its faults, and then demand for better.
One answer to the people who say "how can this be efficient using so much power?". The amount of power they have to bring in, is not relevant. If you replace 1 million trucks, you need power for 1 million trucks. If you replace one, you need power for one. The real question is: how much more efficiënt are they? A diesel truck does 6,5 miles on a gallon. A gallon is around 3.785 liters of fuel. A mile is around 1.609km. So, that translates to 3.785 liters of fuel on 10,46km or 2.76 km on 1 liters of fuel. There is around 10kWh of energy stored in 1 liter of diesel fuel. So 1km of driving a semitruck takes around 3,62kWh of energy. The energy needed to produce diesel is not taken into account in this number. A Tesla Semi uses up to 2kWh per mile, or 1.24kWh per kilometer. So the efficiency of a Tesla Semi is 3.62 / 1.24 = 2.92 times higher than a diesel semi truck. In other words: it takes almost 3x the amount of energy to move a diesel compared to an EV semi. And a truck that uses less energy, is cheaper to operate. If companies start buying these EV semi trucks, it's not because they like to save the planet. It's because they save 2 to 3 times the cost on fuel, every day, every year for every semi truck.
Bit the truck is way more expensive,plus charged needed,and battery life,in commercial service,unknown.Then,very few EV s seem to live up to makers claims.
@@keithhooper6123 Until we know any of the numbers we really can't make valid claim for or against EVs. If a company is doing the shift to EV it's likely worth it. Gotta please the bean counters.
One thing is on paper, another in practice. As for all new things, more real life data is needed for the final conclusion
Add to these stats a vastly reduced maintenance schedule and resultant costs. Brakes last and last, no engine fluids (well, coolant..) and future battery reconditioning advancements will make electric more and more attractive. Range will improve as more resources are directed at the sector.
@@markstevens1729 lol you bought the lie
3 megawatts. 🤯 normal people have no clue how much power that really is.
They have a megapack on site. Sure it helps smoothing out the demand
Still sounds less than 1.21 gigawatts. 😂
That’s not even 100 tractors try over 5 megawatts power grid explosion😮
About the amount of power of one wind turbine.
You will never see one of these without a billboard trailer.
The trailer also needs improvements, solar panels on top and additional batteries that can be charged by solar, charger or swap technology.
Not worth it.
Put the solar where the chargers are.
You're forgetting about weight ?
someone has to try that, thin, film, solar panels don’t weigh that much
@@explor794 I was referring to his mention of adding batteries
So additional weight, so either less payload or more damage to the highway; and higher cost.
Being a trucker for over 20 years now I really would love to drive these Teslas. No oil no diesel no noise 😮😮
Your not a real trucker and don't even try to give me this 20 year BS. I'm sure 19 years of that was spent driving a van.
And no range
What is your phone "range" without 🔌? Calm down this is not OTR ready yet. 200-300 miles easy. Great for local and city driving.
@@MrLeovdmeerno range? 😂😂
@@giacomu1 thats where they will shine, town tractors.
I'd really like to hear them talk efficency vs diesel. Maintenance, brakes, fuel, acceleration, ease of use.
Yes also how much cheaper is it than running diesel. How much cheaper are the electric trucks vs diesel trucks. I think at the end of the day its not cheap at all, because everything is expensive these days. No numbers spoken at all vs the oposite "diesel", that should tell you something that the whole thing is s scam in the end.
It wouldn't matter what they told you I'm guessing you wouldn't believe it anyways @@thetruthyes
and the need for a powerplant to recharge them, coal, nuclear or diesel!
@rearspeaker6364 Well, even if that's true, and it's less true every year, burning diesel is a horribly wasteful way to make a vehicle move. Generating electricity with the diesel and then running a vehicle on it would still be over 30% more efficient thanks to the larger scale of the generators. That gives you an idea of the inefficiency of internal combustion engines.
Pepsico stated, "at a rate of $0.14 per kWh, the off-peak rate in Sacramento - this would result in a 23% fuel cost reduction over the most efficient diesel trucks." I don't know why everyone keeps missing that point.
That seems to be the key to success: the user's own customized recharging system. The "out of service" disease among public recharging sites is unacceptable.
Yes, all public charging EXCEPT for Tesla Superchargers. 👌
“We run everything on Solar” … Next sentence “we had to bring in 3MW for this project” lol 🤦🏽♂️…
How much are 3MW? 3,000,000 watts! The best solar panels make 450W… that means at least 7-8000 solarpanels only for 3MW… they don’t even have 1000 solar panels on their roof. That’s not even enough to Run the AC for that facility size… 2023 people are stupid!!!
@@freedomisnotnegotiable We all see that you don't know everything.
@@freedomisnotnegotiable 3MW is the max service capacity, not the power they use at all times. Just like your house having a 200A service panel, but you don't use 44kW 24/7. They can also contract solar generation as source of their electricity so don't have to generate everything on-site with the panels shown in the video. Maybe learn a little about the subject before calling people stupid? Otherwise you just look, well, stupid.
You are also putting all the eggs in the same basket as you have that proprietary charging solution in your yard. Tesla Gigacharger (as they call it) has a very wonky plug, which can be used only with Tesla Semis. So these cannot be charged "in the wild", anyways. Not even with Tesla Superchargers.
Fantastic overview! It shows that Pepsi put a lot of work into this move to Tesla trucks, and continues to put in a lot of work to monitor the operation to understand it's efficiency and to optimize it. This is a big experiment for them. On the one hand I'm very impressed, on the other I'm a bit dismayed that the move to electric trucks took 3 years and so many smart people working on it.
A whole bunch of smart people built the atomic bomb also. 🤨
@@handimanjay6642shut up you big baby
I would love to see how the battery will last in winter in Alaska or Canada.
Probably the same thermal management system as you'd find in a Tesla car. They're doing just fine. 15-20% less range probably. It's really minor thanks to the heat pump system recovering heat from motors, batteries, computers, ...
@@MattCasters30-40% range diminishment my Neighbor has one and he curses it every December to April….
ironically they tested these trucks in alaska
@@colingoldthorpe5918 the cursing is probably some sort of humble brag then ;-)
@@colingoldthorpe5918 yeah , all the while he isn't buying gas. tough life.
Would like you to make a video where we follow a driver and you have to let the driver talk freely about his experience of this apparently super semi. Also feel free to talk about range and load quantities etc.
I'm agree with that
If you expect to hear negatives, I can bet there would be very few.
@@straighttalk2069 No, I don't expect that, but I would love for one of their drivers to talk about his experiences in a really deep way. Skeptical at the start, but now convinced that electricity is the way forward for that industry as well
@@straighttalk2069 ok 10-4
@@MrAalestrup more like another tool in the Transportation Biz, There is room for other fuels that can be used.
Amazing, the future is now, well done Pepsi and Tesla.
Thanks for the upload. That gal sure can spin the corporate speak. I see they went BYD for their yard mules. I wonder how that's working out. Didn't see any Nikola Motors trucks. They're selling a pretty slick cabover with all the usual EV bells and whistles with pretty decent specs for an electric semi. They're also running them local and regional. It'll be interesting to see how the batteries do with relatively deep discharges and fast recharging. The facility power requirements are really something. They'll need to run a lot more dedicated circuits to expand. Depending on the charge schedule, they'll also need some serious upgrades to be 100% solar powered charging. We'll have to keep an eye on how this test works out.
Isn't Nikola Motors run by a scam artist.
With price reduction in batteries and renewables the transition will be quite rapid. I drive a 1 tonne van and running cost reduction has been the biggest change
wait until you cant go anywhere in the winter.
Man the Semi is so awesome! Can’t wait to see them improve more and have more companies use them! 😄
fuck no
750kW is some impressive charging power! When Tesla brings the Semi to Europe I might consider changing employer and join the team.... I believe it will take the market by storm. Good job Pepsi for leading the way👏👏👏
The problem is these vehicles only work in warm climates like California, not places like the Midwest, Just ask the bus companies that purchased electric buses. They can only go a few blocks before needing a recharge
we have electric buses here in the netherlands and they go for hours (in the winter) before needing a recharge.
80% of new vehicles in Norway are electric and that country is in the Arctic circle snows 9 months of the year.They love them.
Looking at fuel cost/mile: Electric is "
Anyone notice that BYD, Tesla’s biggest competitor, is already there also? BYD is already occupying a segment Tesla hasn’t even mentioned yet .
yeah spotter truck
Yes I noticed it when I zoned out from the incessant bafflegab.
I want to see an official CAT SCALE LOADED!
I want to see one empty so we can see how much it weights just for the truck and trailer.
Impressive. Well done Pepsico.
Way to ruin the environment. How long before you stop drinking the cool aid? This is an ad, not a documentary.
@@petebusch9069L
@@petebusch9069they never even talked real number vs the two trucks electric and diesel. It's all a scam, people just fall for it. I tell everyone that tesla run on coal and natural gas, cause thats what electricity comes from, so they actually havent solved the emmisions that goes in the air that they keep crying about. What a scam.
@@petebusch9069 i mean yeah batteries require mining and a lot of resources to product, but we need to mine more not less. we are a growing society and with that more resources are needed. This is less an environmental play and more a financial one, these trucks are 3x more efficient while having less parts to maintain.
@@sarkaranish I see you read the brochure, those are some quality selling points.
FINALLY! A straightforward video.
Yet they never have once mentioned real numbers between the electric truck and diesel truck. Its all a scam, and then when the whole grid falls they'll blaming it on something else, then they'll try to replace electric cars.
This is an infomercial, they had me scratching my head for a sec until i realized they are all lying to sell a turd
it was nothing but corporate speak for 12 minutes.
EV’s healthier for humans than the products they deliver 🎈
@tumbleweed1976 no
😂
@@gavnonadoroge3092 Oh, you enjoy the health benefits of Pepsi?
@@tumbleweed1976 no
Wrong, EV's are ruining this planet.
that kind of charging is quiet changer, hopefully it could be possible to have it in many places for wider use
As a class one truck driver I am still looking for a Tesla tractor unit in a video where they show even just the back of a tractor unit let alone the coupling and un coupling of the trailer airlines .
I believe it kneels to release the trailer and has a 5th wheel camera. So no more cranking that handle to death.
It works the same as any other semi. Standard gladhands and pigtail.
This is amazing. Thank you
Why are you obsessed with ruining the environment?
@@petebusch9069many of us don’t care about the environment. Global warming is a myth. More EVs mean increased demand for coal and natural gases being used to supply electricity for EVs. It’s a win-win for everyone.
Rock on Pepsi! cant wait to see where the future of your fleet goes!
it will go hydrogen. EV semi trucks are unsustainable for the simple fact that batteries are inefficient in terms of size, weight and capacity
Ev semi trucks weight to much 😂
@@jaysolomon6756 and combustion engined semi's dont?
@@The-Cat I dunno.. we will see where trends go right? The issue with hydrogen is.. its explosive as hell.. and because of that.. the biggest challenge is safely storing it.. and creating a storage solutions within the truck that wont easily puncture etc etc
@@The-Catand hydrogen is unsustainable for the simple fact that creating 0-emissions H2 is extremely costly. Currently over 90% of all hydrogen gas produced is made using fossil fuel, which creates CO2 and completely defeats the purpose of using hydrogen in the first place. By the time hydrogen technology & infrastructure advances enough to make it useful for fleets, battery electric technology will have advanced as well.
Thede trucks have ZERO problems climbing up with full load, it's something never seen before ever
Zero except for the energy consumption part.
@@UhOhUmm
"What goes up, must come down".
They gain *a lot* on the way down.
(It's called physics)
Rather than bringing up brakes going down the hill they get all their energy back into the battery
Full load as in >40,000lbs in the box?
@@claytonbrown7100 _Full load as in >40,000lbs in the box?_
The flatbed towed by a Tesla Semi, accelerating rapidly up a steep slope on Donner Pass, passing a diesel semi as if it were standing still, here: ua-cam.com/video/LtOqU2o81iI/v-deo.htmlfeature=share&t=985, was loaded with about 44,000 lbs. of concrete highway barriers. The dry van trailer towed by a Tesla Semi which drove 500 miles from Fremont, CA to San Diego, CA on 93% battery charge, including climbing and descending the 4,200 ft. Tejon Pass ("The Grapevine"), here: ua-cam.com/video/GtgaYEh-qSk/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Tesla, was loaded with about 42,000 lbs. of pallets.
So, yes.
In my country government gives rebate from 10-35% for EVs but the road tax and insurance is really absurd
I know here in central Wisconsin Pepsi has no near term use for EVs. We just don’t have the charging infrastructure in place yet. Plus most roads are 2 lane blacktop or gravel/sand/dirt roads
I'm a coke guy. That has nothing to do with the Semis Pepsi just tastes odd.
Agreed!
at least there's some schlub waxing and cleaning the glass so you can drink water from a bottle
So the Pepsi plant needs its own electric service...then the concrete plant down the road needs a new substation for their concrete trucks....then the garbage truck terminal needs a new substation for their trucks.....then the LTL terminal needs a new substation for all their trucks.....then the nearby truck stop needs a substation to charge all their trucks.....it's the Oprah Winfrey show. You get a substation, and you get a substation. Everybody gets a substation. The substation fairy will leave a brand new substation under your pillow if you're a good boy and finish your vegetables.
Unfortunately, the taxpayers are paying the bill for this. If it was truly a fair market, Pepsi wouldn’t get a dime from the taxpayers.
Just need more Nuclear power plants
@@havenzhai5187 A 50x100 meter solar panel roof delivers about 0,5kWh/m2. 5000m2 delivers 2500kWh per day, you can full charge 3 trucks of 850kWh for free or 6 trucks 50%. It is a good deal. You only have to asses if you deliver excess power back to the grid or store it in a battery or spare truck. That's why you need a specialist like Tesla and grid company to figure out the best option.
@@s0012823 Where are they going to park that many solar panels? And how many trucks do they have? What happens when the sun doesn’t shine for a week? And lastly, who is going to pay for all that? The taxpayers should not have to shoulder any of that. By your math, if you 27 trucks, you would have to have 10 acres of solar panels. Do you honestly think that is reasonable?
These anti EV folks keep forgetting our own history…we wanted cars, the government built highways. We wanted airplanes, the government financed and built airports… what makes anyone believe that fossil fuels are also not heavily subsidized by our tax $$$, it is. Nothing turns whether old or new tech without substantial government grease…
a solor panel roof for the trailers,may add some
I see these and the Frito Lay ones on the 5 all the time. At least a few times a week.
I see them on the 99 from time to time.
This needs quite significant infrastructure investment. That charger depot costs about $10 million including new sturdy electric supply lines. But as it is currently covered by 50% federal subsidies, the deal is easy to make. Did I understand correctly, that Pepsico or Tesla do not own the charging depot, but it is owned by a third party?
It is also interesting to see, how fast the effective range is beaten out from those traction batteries when the charge cycles seem to be regularly 5% to 95%. That might end up spiking up Tesla's warranty costs, unless there is a clause for less than 18 months durability with 70% range left (or similar) on the contract.
A diesel semi doing 50,000 miles/year should last 15 years. It will be interesting to see cost comparisons after that sort of use.
15 yrs with how much maintenance cost and how many engine swaps?
@@mintheman7Semi trucks can cruise for 300k miles without an engine rebuild. Tell me how many batteries and motors will be replaced in that Gay EV?
@@kyadekhrahahe-n6nlmao in just 10 years of 45,000 miles/year of usage, a semi will save $220K which mean you can buy another whole new Tesla semi 😂
@@jovanleon7 and also a Gay EV can't last for more than 5 years and 100,000 miles 🤣🤣
why gay ? @@kyadekhrahahe-n6n
750 kW charging is madness
Hello Autoselectronics; yes potentially one $200,000 charger could serve more than one Tesla Semi; but there are two problems. #1. If you attempt to share it at the same time; then the charge time doubles because you are splitting the power. #2 1 Truck =12 Ys, 2 trucks 24 Ys etc. Not many local grids can charge 12 or 24 Ys at once. Even in industrial areas with heavy duty grids you can't do more than a couple Semi's at once. So you have to schedule them one after the other. That could cause a line and delays; or it could mean you are constantly charging losing potential billing hours. Pepsi unlike a trucking company could possibly charge a number of trucks during the night; a trucking company has keep on trucking 24 hours.
A Megacharger is equivalent to about 4 V3 chargers (before they get their boost upgrade)
.
Tesla had sites with 150+ V3 chargers.
It's not a problem.
@@rogerstarkey5390you don't understand how trucking works it still would take way too long to charge, many long haul loads are set appointments you can't be taking hours to charge...
the time to charge one of these trucks is only 25 mins from 5% to 95%,this all in managing your fleet up or down time, scheduling is all in your company business plan and strategy, where i work we have 100 electric forklifts and we run 24/7 and have to charge these when needed and it all works out in logistics, planning , trucking companies with diesel fleets have no better turn around time than Pepsi on average it is slower, been in the industry 40 yrs and seen the data for all across North America, its gotten better and is improving every year, it comes down to the owners of the business, are they looking ahead to future proof themselves/business to provide the customer with a reliable service product or be left behind, sure long haul, diesel is still king, these Tesla trucks are in the infancy stage and are seeing decent results and everyone has to crawl before they walk and they're walking pretty darn fast out of the gate I'd say , the barrier here is the human part mostly, not the technology part of this equation, it'll still take years until all this comes to the top, it all has no history or established data yet, lineage doesn't come overnight, nothing does, time will tell and if companies don't build in obsolescence in their BEV's this all could be a great thing in the future, time will tell
Driving a truck for a junk food company is not for a trucking company. A trucking firm makes a its living shipping and moving things. Pepsi is a company who's profits have little or nothing to do with moving their products around and is centered in this case in producing and distrubuting junk food; a very profitable business with very little positive consumer relations of late. So burning some money on 21 green EV trucks is called public relations Pepsi is green! Cool EV trucks!
Pepsi, Coke and Nestle were named the top plastic pollutants, hope Pepsi comes up with environmentally friendly bottles and not pollute oceans with plastic garbage
@@treborsirrah7916 wrong but they do catch fire; only about 100 are in private hands and 1 already caught fire and blocked I-80 for 16 hours.. Insurance will kill BEVs.
@@treborsirrah7916 Perhaps for short haul but I am talking about trucking - long haul. Who pays for maintenance during the warranty period? What they pay for for real is wasted time and interuptions in function. Tesla Semi has had a total of only 100 trucks in civilian hands; already one has burned up and blocked highway I-80 for 16 hours while it burned. Wouldn't it be a great word if there were 100,000 of these electric trucks blocking 3 highways ever day for 16 hours.
It’s just obvious future. “Canceling out the hill” is what makes this absolutely amazing. You can see this with any Tesla when you drive mountains.
Now i would only drink PepsiCo produkt, Goodbye Cola. PepsiCo are insane to see transporting Effeciency....
10:00 a BYD vehicle there, a Chinese EV company
Wow she even mentioned battery-powered Forklifts. Interesting new invention.
😂
Tell us how many emissions it took to make that truck and battery?
I'm guessing existing trucks are made with fairy dust?
Almost the whole battery can be recycled and made into a new one. This offsets a significant amount of the initial carbon output from mining.
Way less than making a diesel tractor then running it on diesel for years.
OH PEPSI is a trucking company - so says LANEC. From Microtrends "PepsiCo, Inc. is the manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of grain-based snack foods, beverages, and other products. It's driven by a complementary food and beverage portfolio that includes Frito-Lay, Gatorade, Pepsi-Cola, Quaker and Tropicana. PepsiCo's product portfolio includes a wide range of enjoyable foods and beverages.' Gee funny they don't mention trucking revenues LANEC. There are none.
wonder what year they contracted out , all the trucking jobs ?
Time will tell all. Let's see how the big scale goes. Hopefully good. Next thing will be Pepsi goes out of business. Activists will push to end soda products after renewable are used.
Has anyone try to drive one of those trucks in the mountains fully loaded
Tesla has been testing them in these environments. You can find videos of Tesla Semis overtaking regular trucks while driving uphill.
Mountainous terrain is where the Tesla Semi has the greatest advantage over diesel semis; first, because they have 2-3 times the HP of diesel semis, allowing them to climb steep grades at highway speeds; second because regenerative braking removes almost all of the fuel penalties for steep climbs and descents; and third, because there's no loss of power at high altitudes, and in fact slightly better economy due to less air resistance.
You can see a graphic example of this in the 500 mile range test, with a payload of around 43,000 lbs., climbing and descending the 4,200 ft. Tejon Pass ("The Grapevine") with almost no loss of range compared to running on level roads, here: ua-cam.com/video/LtOqU2o81iI/v-deo.htmlfeature=share&t=1221.
I see these everyday and they are freaking awesome.
Nice trucks, but if correct, these Tesla Trucks they DONT have sleepers built ito them, meaning that if a driver does one of those 450 mile drives, and if he wants to get some rest, he has to to to get some sleep while sitting in that drivers seat, right? Is the Tesla Semi a sleeper cab?
It does not, however, have any sleeping arrangements for the driver. It's strictly a day cab configuration, meaning it's not suited for trips that take multiple days. Tesla's Semi is impressive in many different ways.
How big of an investment ,Congratulations Pepsi.
$250k pr truck
why don't you put solar panels on top of the trailers?
In the works and also powered trailers.
Someone FINALLY placed the driver in the CENTER, for safety and VISIBILITY. Took 120 years to do like a lot of race cars do. Even NASCAR, the seat is more toward the center, and the chromoly cage bows out from the driver, for more crush space.
Those trucks will never be used for OTR. In the winter time they will consistently miss up especially when there are power outages.
i love how they consider 400 miles long range. Id love to see them somehow charge up in less than 3 hours on random chargers on the road. I doubt they have enough fast chargers anywhere to charge these trucks
The reason that diesel itself doesn't catch fire is it is not flamable at normal temprature and pressure. it isn't any more flamable than your cooking oil which usually can be used in place of diesel. A lithium battery can catch fire doing nothing. As for this italian accident - lets find the link; because diesel on a road shouldn't be able to catch fire; Perhaps it was gasoline. The mechanics of "two trucks crashing" means only one would need to have gasoline or another ignitable fuel on board. There are some diesel engine fires. diesel will burn under pressure, but all diesels have a fuel cut off to stop fuel going to the engine which puts out the fire. These are always due to improper use of the engine; so on a rare occasion some bad driver will not be in the truck when the first starts; and the fire can keep going. I am talking two trucks under proper operation by licensed drivers - a lithium truck can catch on fire and not be put out. A Diesel will not catch fire.
0:49, the guy driving in the center of the vehicle, crazy
Yes,really stupid. Try overtaking
"Decarbonazation strategy!!..its about money,you're not fooling anyone!.
Once the total transitions costs are amortized over 5-10 years for their entire prime mover fleet, the operating costs will be the biggest win.
I want to see the power bill for that operation
Notice at 11:00 the other vehicle is a BYD. Are they using both types to compare or is BYD testing for their own market in China?
that BYD is small vehicle meant for moving trailers in the pepsi yard only. it doesn't do transports.
I wish these people would have to add “at the site of use” to the zero emissions claim!
This is the last thing they need to be worried about. They sell sugar water and potatoes flavored salt.
seems like that business has been working for them for 100 years now
Image how far this truck will go on a charge if they mated it with a trailer that have regen brakes in was peddle flow eqjipped.
Wait till they will have to replace the batteries and the power bill goes up. How efficient will that be?
Great video 👍
Why only one seat ? How do you train new drivers ? What about team drivers ?
What does "fully loaded" mean?
How many pounds of payload for the long 400 mile haul?
google it
Lots of wasted money on just a soda bottling plant..
Although I'm glad this is possible in transportation.
They get it for free from Tesla so that they will advertise it on roads and it is for short distances because it will be hard to find special charges for them everywhere !!
I don’t know what a megawatt is. They should educate us more. I have an idea of a gallon but not a watt.
A kilowatt is 1,000Watt, a megawatt is 1,000,000 Watt. A modern house in Europe will have around a 17,250 Watt watt connection, so a 3 Megawatt connection is about 174 connections for modern homes. That seems like a lot but on an industrial scale it's very small. A modern EPR nuclear reactor can deliver around 1,650 megawatts.
What is the purpose of theses skirts underneath the sidesteps? Improved aerodynamics?
yes!
Wow 3MW. 😮
Imagine being a utility trying to balance loads like that for just one customer. Like a suburb's worth of power for one customer. A customer would want to set up grid frequency stabilisation systems with this kind of supply, like virtual power plant set up to offer back to the grid for a fee. In the long term, multiple customers would need to order that kind of power. I keep thinking 1.21 gigawatt!
Ferries between Sweden and Denmark charge at about 10MW.
For most utility companies, this means increasing production at nuclear power plants.
Great video ❤❤
Pepsi, keep this in mind, at the end of the day,the people made your company,if you push for electric for the whole trucking industry,don’t forget what happened to Budweiser, the people buy your product,not your customers
Are you threatening a company for exploring future solutions and efficiencies?
Truckers need to stop drinking pepsi and beer anyways.
SO IS THE PRICE OF THE PEPSI PRODUCTS GOING TO BE CHEAPER SINCE YOU ARE SAVING SO MUCH MONEY ON FUEL?
Wait, so they need to unload every time they need to charge? I guess for now, EV trucks are limited to specific tasks, not bad since most are not so demanding, although city trucks is what we need more than semi trucks.
i think the reason is that they mostly charge at night when they would be unloaded anyways and they run the whole day on one charge maybe you could install chargers at the unloading docks as well just topping off a bit while you standing there anyways
Nice but as a pro trucker i dont like sitting in the center when reversing.
Can we all agree that corporate speak needs to go.
corporation schools edge other services ?
😅Agreed! I could only make it a few minutes into this video before I had to switch off.
I work for a corporation who did not used to do presentations this way until recently.
1.1 kWh/km is it fully loaded? What is the overall GTW?
Yes fully loaded it can haul 78000 lbs. You can see a you tube video of it doing a 502 mile run with 78000 lbs on it. 50% cheaper on fuel.
@@terrya6486That wasn’t the GTW.
@@tatata1543 It did five hundred and eight miles with seventy eight thousand pounds of cargo in it.
@@terrya6486 The maximum allowed weight of a fully laden electric semi is 82000 so you are saying the truck and trailer weighed around 4000 pounds? Really? The weight you quoted was probably the total weight , not the “cargo weight” which, even after all this time, Tesla have still not released which is a bit suspicious.
@@tatata1543 Your correct it was seventy eight thousand total pounds. There is a full length video of the entire drive. Is from fremont california to san diego california. The truck is fully capable of it. And pepsico in sacramento put a thousand seventy eight miles on one of those trucks in twenty four hours using three drivers. But that's not what it's really for. There's a Tesla semi, it runs from Modesto, California to Oakhurst, California. Every day and I got to see a few days a week. Saving more than six hundred dollars a day in fuel. The being counters are beside themselves the amount of profit that is is astounding.
Yes they in California they not allowed any diesel motors in the state
A corporate commercial, i hope you got paid well for this drivel.
Have they said what the payload capacity is yet? More than a year later and no one seems to know.
It doesn't matter much at this early stage. They'll be used where it makes the most economic sense. Most trucks are cubed out with a full trailer and not near the weight limit. As it all develops over the next 25 years they will slowly improve, as will the ROI.
@@davidmccarthy6061 It doesn’t matter to you but maybe the people paying for them might not agree . If a diesel rig can carry a lot more than an EV rig it will be much more cost effective (and probably much cheaper to buy the diesel rig). I’m far from convinced EV semis are a viable proposition for the industry. My suspicion is that Tesla aren’t saying because the capacity is so much smaller that it impacts its attraction as an investment. The fact they haven’t said after more than a year lends weight to that theory.
Well done Pepsi👍🏻
3MW lmao if they grow any bigger, they're gonna need one of those mini nuclear power plans they're talking about building long in the future
Sounds all quite good. How do they supply electricity 100% from solar if the trucks charge during the night?
Looks like they use onsite battery banks. Possibly still pull some energy from the grid.
The solar panels still produce a few milliwatts (combined total) from the sunlight reflected from the moon (depending of course on how clear of a night it is, moon phase, and position in the sky at any point in the night), fireflies, aircraft flying over, and possibly nearby street lamps which are getting their power from the grid.
Just kidding. I mean maybe they do still produce some amount of negligible power at night but I just made that up.
Full disclosure: I’m drinking cherry coke right now.
Just kidding about drinking cherry coke as well. I’m just trying to be funny but turned out to be flat out stupid. I’m sorry to have wasted your time, or entertained you, whichever it ended up being.
@@urbanteckwe currently don’t have the battery tech to support that unfortunately. i believe the way it works is the daytime solar gets redistributed to the grid and in return they receive credits which they use to pull from the grid at the night. but idk that’s an assumption.
In one of the overhead yard shots you can see the Tesla battery banks next to the charging stations. Re-charge at night at a lower rate,
and use to charge during the day. If you can hook up with solar, you have free energy cost.(Less the cost of the installation).
This is being done all over North America by the prime power suppliers to replace what are called Peak Power Stations which are used to add power to peak demand times, at a fraction of the cost of gas plants, plus no on-site employees are require to run them.
is this guy rajiv Gomez ? Gangothiri after ganga or bhavani or cauvery or Sutlej ?
Amazing!
Indra Nooyi's legacy. Awesome girl
We really need a honest driver review. This video is not even worth watching. They only tell good things.
You didnt hear the drivers reviewing it?
They good for local trucks
Next time I see a driver on the 99 I’ll ask him for his REAL experience
If only they spoke on the harm done to the environment during the production of the batteries for those trucks.
Nobody cares about the environment. It’s great that more batteries are being produced and it’s also great that more coal/natural gas are being used to generate the increase demand of electricity. The coal/natural gas companies get more money and customers from the increased demands and EV owners get their electricity. It’s a win-win.
Cool
I’m waiting for Amazon to look into this for their “road brand image”
amazon trucks typically run long distances, from facility to facility or state to state, which would not work due to a lack of infrastructure to support that. these local Pepsico trucks work because they always return to a home base to charge. Amazon has done last mile delivery electric already which works the same as the delivery vehicle returns back to a delivery center where there would be charging infrastructure
@@coreysuffield I’m from the UK so the most Amazon drives here is maybe 400 miles at a maximum. I know I’ve never gone over 350. Much different here
They had to bring in 3megawatts of power? So you have to bring in the equivalent to a towns worth of power just to support a few electric trucks and forklifts? How can that be efficient? Where does that power get sourced from? how much more emissions could be generated if from traditional gas or fossil fuel power plants?
The amount of power they have to bring in, is not relevant. If you replace 1 million trucks, you need power for 1 million trucks. If you replace one, you need power for one. The real question is: how much more efficiënt are they? A diesel truck does 6,5 miles on a gallon. A gallon is around 3.785 liters of fuel. A mile is around 1.609km. So, that translates to 3.785 liters of fuel on 10,46km or 2.76 km on 1 liters of fuel. There is around 10kWh of energy stored in 1 liter of diesel fuel. So 1km of driving a semitruck takes around 3,62kWh of energy. The energy needed to produce diesel is not taken into account in this number. A Tesla Semi uses up to 2kWh per mile, or 1.24kWh per kilometer. So the efficiency of a Tesla Semi is 3.62 / 1.24 = 2.92 times higher than a diesel semi truck. In other words: it takes almost 3x the amount of energy to move a diesel compared to an EV semi.
Also electric drivetrain is better with less maintenence.@@MoosePower740
Would like to see it hauling 46,000 lbs. I'm really do, just to see how it moves
ive seen it. it pulls 80k lbs and gets up to speed faster than the average EMPTY diesel truck.
@@apocalypto559 wow ...now that's something
@@apocalypto559
Nobody calculates accumulated time savings on a journey.
If there's let's say 10 miles uphill during a day.
If this truck holds at least 60mph average on those sections and a conventional truck is at 30, just that puts the Tesla 10 minutes ahead.
Same applies downhill, with better control, more speed and Regen adding to range, reducing charge time (if required)
It won't haul 46,000 lbs. But here's a video of a Tesla Semi, pulling a flatbed loaded with 44,000 lbs. of concrete highway barriers, accelerating *rapidly* up a steep grade on Donner Pass (watch the speedometer), and passing a diesel semi as if it were standing still: ua-cam.com/video/LtOqU2o81iI/v-deo.htmlfeature=share&t=985.
They only carry chips for the longer runs and maybe sodas a short distance. A fully laden soda truck is heavy and knocks down the battery fast depending on the terrain.
So will they put TA/Petro, Loves, Pilot/Flying J out of business? I understand they will have super chargers for these vehicles over the road but I don’t see how this brings down cost. Trucks break and with breakdown being unknown how will the companies compensate for that? Still interesting truck though
"Trucks break"....
Consider this.
Drive failure on a diesel?
The truck stops.
1 motor fails on this truck?
That motor disengages, the truck compensates (still with better performance) informs the driver.
Within a minute or so, the driver gets a call from the local Tesla service (flagged by the truck) who advise that it needs a unit. They ask the driver where his planned overnight stop will be and his ETA.
A mobile unit meets the driver at the location and the drive is replaced.
Alternatively, if it's a light load, the driver can continue to a more convenient location, finishing the job.
.
Minimum downtime.
@@rogerstarkey5390 I see your point but one thing you are neglecting is parts shortage. Currently peterbilts, freightliners, Volvos, Mack’s all are on parts shortage. If every truck were to be Tesla you think Tesla could compensate for the part right away?
Frankly, being new/old tech (evs have been around for over 100 years) its hard to tell what total cost of ownership will be, their testing this stuff to see its viability. Same thing happened when motorized trucks took over from horse and buggie. The maintenance tho is supposed to be better, and given the simpler system (comparatively) the failures should be fewer and far between meaning that once bugs are worked out they should be rather solid. As for parts shortages, yes that will cause issues, but then again, a short part is a short part, doesn't matter if its diesel or EV. This stuff will happen, we can play the game of what if all we want but the only way to make this tech work is if people buy into it, show its faults, and then demand for better.
8:30
“I Grew Up On This Truck,” He Says.
HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE!?!?!?!?!?
The Truck Hasn’t Even Been Out For A Year!!!!!
What about plastic bottles?