This is really helpful. I have a similar grading rubric, but I love that you have students fill in their own rubrics. I use your emotional color wheel video with my students all the time. It’s great!
Thank you for this video. I'm teaching advertising & graphic design for the first time -- I have no art or design background (our state only requires a business certification for teaching g. design). Your rubrics will be a great help to me going forward. Thanks again!
I know this is an old video but I have a question; I'm in the market for being a substitute art teacher so, when do you think is it neccessary to give a student a D or an F??
Have a rubric that clear and NOT based on prettiness. Did they meet the minimal expectations to pass? If so, a 70%. If not, then grade it fairly but dispassionately and give notes that are specific.
Respectfully, I think that all students k-12, regardless of talent, should receive a 100% in art projects, provided that it can be established that they followed the rubric. I think it is a mistake to "quantify" creativity, because it can be very discouraging to some students, who genuinely thought that they produced something magnificent. I have a daughter, who has scored a100% on every single art project k-9. In ninth grade, which just concluded, she was taking an advanced art class with seniors, and was the only student to score a 100% on all assignments. But she is also very advanced for her age. Not every child is going to be advanced. As society is rapidly transitioning into the realm of generative A.I. art, we need to be encouraging young people to stick with traditional art, as from a developmental standpoint, it is far more valuable. I know of several exceptionally bright A+ students, who are afraid of taking art, for fear of getting a grade in art class that will lower their GPA.
@@artedguru, respectfully, students with advanced art skills will be always perceived as "more creative", which has an entangled element of grading bias, often leading to an unfair assessment system for less advanced students. Creativity is absolutely quantified, in that sense, but it shouldn't be. Not when they are this young. At the risk of sounding redundant, I will once more say that unless enrolled in advanced art courses, which are merit based, all k-12 general art student should receive a 100% on projects, provided that they can demonstrate they did the best that they could with their skill set. In your demonstration, you have also placed a higher "creativity" value on the exhibited latter works, compared to the very first work that you have featured.
This is really helpful. I have a similar grading rubric, but I love that you have students fill in their own rubrics. I use your emotional color wheel video with my students all the time. It’s great!
Thank you for this video. I'm teaching advertising & graphic design for the first time -- I have no art or design background (our state only requires a business certification for teaching g. design). Your rubrics will be a great help to me going forward. Thanks again!
Very good video of grading art in school. I was curious how teachers did that since kids have varying talent.
I use a Rubic too. The students grade themselves. I give 25 points for each section. There is a teacher and students section to grade.
Wow
I know this is an old video but I have a question; I'm in the market for being a substitute art teacher so, when do you think is it neccessary to give a student a D or an F??
Have a rubric that clear and NOT based on prettiness. Did they meet the minimal expectations to pass? If so, a 70%. If not, then grade it fairly but dispassionately and give notes that are specific.
Respectfully, I think that all students k-12, regardless of talent, should receive a 100% in art projects, provided that it can be established that they followed the rubric. I think it is a mistake to "quantify" creativity, because it can be very discouraging to some students, who genuinely thought that they produced something magnificent. I have a daughter, who has scored a100% on every single art project k-9. In ninth grade, which just concluded, she was taking an advanced art class with seniors, and was the only student to score a 100% on all assignments. But she is also very advanced for her age. Not every child is going to be advanced. As society is rapidly transitioning into the realm of generative A.I. art, we need to be encouraging young people to stick with traditional art, as from a developmental standpoint, it is far more valuable. I know of several exceptionally bright A+ students, who are afraid of taking art, for fear of getting a grade in art class that will lower their GPA.
You said, "I think it is a mistake to "quantify" creativity"... My video and method does not even include "creativity."
@@artedguru, respectfully, students with advanced art skills will be always perceived as "more creative", which has an entangled element of grading bias, often leading to an unfair assessment system for less advanced students. Creativity is absolutely quantified, in that sense, but it shouldn't be. Not when they are this young. At the risk of sounding redundant, I will once more say that unless enrolled in advanced art courses, which are merit based, all k-12 general art student should receive a 100% on projects, provided that they can demonstrate they did the best that they could with their skill set. In your demonstration, you have also placed a higher "creativity" value on the exhibited latter works, compared to the very first work that you have featured.