STRAW DOGS - Trailer - (1971) - HQ
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 лют 2010
- Trailer for Sam Peckinpah's film starring Dustin Hoffman, Susan George, Peter Vaughan, T.P. McKenna. Del Henney, Jim Norton, David Warner, Donald Webster, Ken Hutchison, Colin Welland,
- Фільми й анімація
that voice over is the best
I think he used to do voice-overs for the NFL games in the late sixties and early seventies I think his name was John Facenda plus he would do movie trailers trying to scare the hell out of you.
"There are five men out there"
"I know that"
Underrated Hoffman classic.
One of the best rôle of Dustin Hoffmann with "the Graduate". C'est là qu'on se rend comte qu'on a pas la même attitude devant la mort et la peur. Droit dans ses pompes. Super film
A truly excellent film, superb with Dustin Hoffman and a 19 year old Susan George, the entire cast is excellent, very compelling but very violent ending.
I was actually wondering if anyone would compare this movie to Clockwork Orange and Taxi Driver
@@adamquiles2468 same year as ACO! Taxi Driver was a few later but good call, I agree!
Why don't I find out about the good movies until they make remakes? I freaking love Dustin Huffman. I haven't seen this one but it looks a lot better.
Same here have you seen into the labyrinth? I think it's so underrated
Straw Dogs is one of the greatest films, came from the novel "The Siege Of Trencher's Farm."
The book was so good
That was one crazy-ass movie...
Every man has a breaking point
Bad acting ? Am I dreaming ? Dustin Hoffman is just one of the greatest actors of all time
+Jesus Christ YEP - I absolutely agree with you! Besides - I've never seen him deliver a lousy performance!!
Have u even seen the movie
@Jesus Christ:
Hah! Get your own username, nub!
And _Straw Dogs_ [1971] doesn't have bad acting in it. Maybe you're confusing it with that nub 2011 remake that no one gave a crap about.
@@codeoptimizationware2803 yes sir. The intensity of the misery or lust in most facial closeups make a lot of the overall feel. The acting is suberb imho.
Great movie about the mechanisms of violence!
വരത്തൻ
Sir I find your comments under the clips of every great film! Is this a principal?
I just learned about this movie the other day. Quentin Tarantino mentioned he had watched it in the 70's. Helped to shape his very successful film career.
@free-peace5555 In English?
@free-peace5555Because it's harder than first
I married an English chick and left America and went to England. Wish I viewed this movie beforehand.
"there are five men out there!"
Dustin: "I know that" lololol
"Now unleashes Dustin Hoffman..."
LOL
this and the wild bunch proove that sam peckinpah is one of the top 20 best directors
Happy Birthday today(August 8) to Dustin Hoffman. Cheers!
A film that has never lost its power. The Man who played villain Chris Causey the rat catcher, actually actor Jim Norton, walked into my local pub one afternoon. Couldn't believe my eyes! In the film he meets a grisly end. Beaten to death by Hoffman wielding a poker.
Watching the new version now
Well, you’re not really are you, as you’re typing this. Unless you have a UA-cam ‘Comments’ secretary.
Great acting and great film making.
I have only watched the most recent one with Alexander Skarsgard, but I NEED to watch this one too I love Dustin Hoffman!
This original is vastly superior to the remake that never should have been made.
This looks like a good movie, I respect Dustin Hoffman.
Anyone here after watching “varathan” Malayalam movie 🎥
Same storyline.. Writers need to be original next time. There are still smart audiences out there who can tell the difference between authenticity and duplicity
Yaya varathan original
ഇങ്ങനെ അടിച്ചു മാറ്റണ്ടായിരുന്നു
Copy paste😂😂😂
Me
It's actually not that bad. The trailer makes it cheesier than it really is. This is actually a REALLY good movie.
Well - which is it? "Not that bad" or "REALLY good?!" 😂 (Never mind me; I'm just giving you $hit in a playful way; not really making fun of you. Of course, that's kinda difficult to portray through text alone - but if you heard my tone, you'd know LOL)
@@siadawn Lol all good, this is an 8 year old comment, so I think this might have been before youtube implemented direct replies and comment threads, so I was probably responding to someone else in the comments who might have been saying that this looks like a bad movie based off the trailer (some of the first comments were saying how the remake is better etc. so it was probably one of those)
@@CharlieTooHuman LOL. Oops. Yea I noticed *after* I posted the comment how old it was. Sorry! :) But just the same, I thought that was cute. Not trying to be rude lol
@@siadawn Oh no you’re good! Lol
It is not just really good, it is a FUCKING masterpiece!!!!
I thought this movie was made before. I saw a trailer for a remake. Of course, I mean they remake everything, but I went out and bought this. I love Dustin Hoffman. He's one of my favorite actors of all time. It's fun watching him fuck people up. It's so out of character.
This trailer is really only the last half hour. Film was pretty good. The last 30 minutes are incredible!
By the way, to those of you who have indeed seen the movie but are also aware of its controversy (not to mention, the fact that at the time, it was banned - more on that later.) Whilst by no means was the movie endorsing of sexual violence against Amy George's character as well as violence in general (including of one teenage female character in it), I have to wonder, why did Sam Peckinpah make the first act of sexual assault against Amy George's character somewhat ambiguous, leading critics and audiences to believe that either the character was "enjoying it" or that it was not "brutal enough" and causing great controversy as a result? And was that also the MAIN reason the movie was banned?
Also, in your opinion, do you think Dustin Hoffman's character was a good man, a HERO in this (people have asked similar questions on Travis Bickle's character from "Taxi Driver") or, if not outright villain, then at least an anti hero etc? And do you think he did the right thing in killing those villagers who were attacking his house and even defend an accused child molester? And do you think he treated Susan George's character badly as well or not?
And was the movie really WORTH all this controversy, ESPECIALLY with regards to the first point? (Some have even questioned if that scene WAS "rape" in the first place, but let's face it, she didn't want it and he DID force herself on her, so why the arguments?) (Maybe with regards to the first scene as such and is treatment, director Sam Peckinpah and the screen writer intended to, perhaps, make a radical and controversial statement about various DIFFERENT aspects to (in this case female) victim's reaction towards an act of rape and/or sexual assault (like, maybe how the body may also at times react even if the victim is totally against it), but without even REMOTELY suggesting or implying that either (Dear God) victim really "enjoys it" or that it is "not rape/sexual abuse) and therefore shouldn't be "illegal" and that it isn't "emotionally and possibly also physically hurtful in the process" etc, or maybe it was a statement that whilst not wanting it or not consenting it, Susan George's character in the scene simply was either too feared to fight back etc or wanted to play along so that the perpetrator Charlie does not cause her MORE pain and damage in the process, hence why it looked that way and caused controversy, and maybe Peckinpah also did not want to spell anything for audiences out and leave them to reach their own conclusion, similar to whether or not Hoffman's character is a hero here or not.
In any case though, it is still a great movie and a controversial early 70s movie classic, even if not quite Sam Peckinpah's greatest achievement but one of his top 10 best for sure.
The first one started out as a rape but eventually Susan George's character relents and it becomes consensual. Do not forget, Venner was an old flame from her younger days, she also was denied by Dustin Hoffman's character. Women have needs too, she purposely teased the men, she led on Venner who obviously was crazy jealous and she enjoyed it. She was looking for that crazy action hence why she consented and ended up enjoying it. This scene shows history between people does make a difference.
some of the most believably violent movies ever made were made in the 1970s. I guess it was all that Vietnam War in your face killing live and in color. gave these movie directors ideas.
John W Sam Peckinpah served in the Marine Corps during ww2 and he actually saw some chinese men get gunned down right in front of him. But im pretty sure Sam Peckinpah studied Vietnam footage to get an even more realistic feel.
John W that and film makers back then didn’t pussy foot around anything for anyone!! They always took risks. Now Hollywood’s been completely PC-ed to fuck and has officially been pussified!!
Nah, it is just good old Peckinpah style: stylized violence.
@@rossdiamondthief6627 I KNOW RIGHT
Holy sh*t - Dustin Hoffman unleashed!?
I'm scared.
@martini 1900 If you are looking for a somewhat entertaining horror movie that doesn’t leave any unanswered questions, then Lurie’s remake should give you something to do this Saturday night. On the other hand, if you’re looking for an unsettling psychological thriller that will have you debating with your companions long after the credits have rolled, Peckinpah’s original will better serve you.
Every dog has its day.
And night.
Unleashes Dustin Hoffman LMAOOOOO!
Filmed in st Buryan Cornwall used to be a picture of Hoffman playing the pubs piano after filming finished finished
Screw your Kraken, I'm unleashing the "Dustin Hoffman"
One of the best ever
Such an underrated film.
Stop saying that stfu
@@CinematicMaj bruh, can you not
1 WORD CLASSIC;)
Classic trailer..
A cult classic
Great movie classic
I would like to see the kid from Transformers play the Hofffman role.
The constable was Charlie Gimbert (Lovejoy)
Klasse Film
I'm watching Straw Dogs version on Tubi 2024🤨🤔👍😍
When you push too hard a calm man, he can become a dangerous man, a killer without remorse.
yes
Straw Dogs reminded me of Taxi Driver because they were both about the psyche of men where Dinero and Hoffman snapped
Those are two completely different genres of movies lol.
And Taxi Driver is 1000 times better movie.
You probably got this confused with "Dog Day Afternoon", which is about a bank robbery.
@Jamal Blythe
: "You probably got this confused with "Dog Day Afternoon", which is about a bank robbery."
No, no, that's Al Pacino in that one, which came out four years later in 1975, and was directed by Sidney Lumet, and is also an excellent film, back when Hollywood had real talented people in it and still yet knew how to make movies. Don't remake _Dog Day Afternoon_ . And the 2011 _Straw Dogs_ remake is shit.
It was cold out.
This film is better than A Midsummer's Night Dream (1999).
Chick: THere are five men out there! *pant* *pant*
Dustin Hoffman: *nerdy totally calm voice* I know that~
What was the music in the second half of the trailer
Is there any need to see the remakes of PSYCHO, STRAW DOGS, or THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE, to say nothing of TAKING OF PELHAM 123? When are they going to remake KITTY FOYLE, that's what I want to know!
I can't believe none of the comments referenced how hot Susan George was.
Surprising, really. Given that this was all filmed in the UK.
Not only hot, but a VERY underrated actress!
She was typically just a dumb blonde.
What a masterpiece and of course they had to ruin it with a shitty remake. No wonder Hollywood has (mostly) lost its magic. The distance between the people who really have a passion for making movies and the ones who greenlight projects...
Yes idk why they remade this for it’s already already amazing
This kinda has the same quality as The Last House On The Left,It is kinda similar.
Oooh! The movie, "The Last House on the Left" is what brought me here, incidentally - sort of! I watched it on Amazon Prime Video; then in related videos, I saw the updated remake of "Straw Dogs." So, following the comments on the trailer of the remake brought me here, to the original 1971 version.
But I didn't think I'd see a comment about "The Last House on the Left" here! 😂Btw, "The Last House on the Left" was a very good movie!! I just watched it - and I enjoyed it. I can definitely recommend, to those who haven't seen it.
It/s far superior to Last House on the Left (1972)
@@user-mj1qo8vm1x Thanks. I must've got the year wrong! :)
@@siadawn Ah I waz referring to Last House ye but yo good ( :
Can't compare a good James Marsden with a master like Dustin Hoffman
Straw Dogs, for me, is Peckinpah’s 3rd best film after 2nd, Ride the High Country and 1st, The Wild Bunch. Technically, there are some unforgivable bloopers, not least a scene where the viewer can clearly see the reflection of the camera in a car window, but this notwithstanding, this film is a masterpiece. A revolting masterpiece, to be sure, but for me, the blood-soaked, skin-strafed pile driver ending was in no way gratuitous. Hoffman’s feckless, feeble (until this climax), David, had had his buttons pushed to the limit, such that the seemingly sudden, sanguinary slaughter committed by this rather repressed, timid milquetoast was wholly in keeping with the foregoing events of the film. For me, amongst other things, this film may be subtitled, ‘The Revenge of the Bullied’. Peckinpah masterfully orchestrates things such that we are wholly rooting for Hoffman in the notorious denouement. I like to consider myself a law-abiding, generally mild-mannered individual, but in this revolting (in a good way) movie I can live out my vicarious revenge-fantasies in a cathartic (a Geek tragedy?), safe way. 🤠
@FREE - PEACE Yes.
Lean nuestro reporte exclusivo en español sobre la versión original de “Straw Dogs” (1971) y la polémica que todavía la rodea, un día antes del estreno de su ‘remake’ en los Estados Unidos!
Capolavoro di peckimpah
Around what year did voiceovers in movie trailers end?
sideburns FTW!
This is actually miles away from the book.
WHY IS THIS MOVIE ABSENT FROM EVERYWHERE -
Where can you watch it?!
This was sort of like the Shuttered Room with Oliver Reed
To me, most disturbing film ever.
@djc5ICK 1971? not old enough!
Or Reservoir Dogs
what is the tick tock instument in the begining of the trailer
0:18 ...
vijay gowda newtons cradle
Really though, at least watch it on it's own merit and not base it off, "Oh it's a remake, it's gonna suck." That's so childish. That's so narrow-minded.
Any one here after watching Malayalam movie Varathan
No,hate when people blatantly copy the classics, shame on such unoriginal makers
MAYBE Bulgaria HAS many
Great movie let's see if it's remake would be great two :D
Why all the remakes hollywood? Its enough to make one vomit! Quit with the remakes and get some original Ideas!
This original is a 10 in my book. The remake is garbage.
@Dogbite Williams..Totally agree with you about Straw Dog.What a superb film together with Soldier Blue from around the same era.I know that I sneaked into the pictures under age to see Straw Dogs! Don't think you can beat the original in general,mainly through the shock factor.Of course occasionally a film doesn't stand the test of time. I can't think of 1 remake that I've ever seen that has been much good!!🙃🥺
Best Sam Peckinpah's movie !
0:12
Anyone else afraid of this happening to them?
Not really.
This trailer is so epic
An English country town??
it's a village five miles from Penzance. I've been there actually.
Any movie about rape is definitely uncomfortable viewing. But these stories must reflect reality - current issue of sexual harassment in the news comes to mind.
12 secs
@philosophygoth91 Bad simile, music is not in essence a narrative art, a good cover is really a re-invention, a bad cover is an attempt to take advantage someone else's creative status. The film equivalent of a cover are subtle quotes, like Carpenter's Halloween references to Pyscho, or De Palma's re-invention of Antonion's Blow Up in his Blow Out. But I agree some remakes are quite good, and it is wrong to authomatically say they're shit, although comparison is always valid.
This is the movie Fear with mark whalberg ripped off.
It's not good for Cornwall's tourism businesses! Too realistic...
വരത്തൻ
I finally got to watch this movie in full after attempting it a few times over the past 20 years and what a let down. so overrated.
@complexhex123 I haven't seen the movie yet, but yes I heard she is raped in it.
വരതതൻ..
Maluz athiyalay😂😂😂😂
@philosophygoth91 How the f*ck are we going to watch a remake on its own merit? OxyMORONIC, someone? Remakes and adaptations are better or worse than their source. Period. If someone wants a movie watched on it's own merit better do an original story, or at least change the title.
Violence for its own sake
Is this a cult classic?
Yes, always much better than a ‘classic cult’, I find.
@Awkwardgesundheit what made me even more uncomfortable is that first she was raped - that made me angry, then she started enjoying it - it made me confused and angry with her, then she got raped again and didnt enjoy it - i felt like someone was screwdriving my nails
@Awkwardgesundheit Not sure if 100% rape... at some point she even smiles. Made me fucking sick.
on guy's dog got killed by straws!
watched the 2011 movie, i think it was quite good, until the stupid end started
just saw the remake and its not bad
+gremian gremlin you mean it's not JUST a little bad it's totally bad
+Reid 1408 I thought the remake did a fine job.
Reid 1408 yeah and who the hell thought is was a good idea to cast James Marsden as the NERD! WTF?!!
+Lavern Merriweather He wasn't a "nerd". He was a liberal.
Mike Paul obviously it did poorly at the box office and was panned by UA-cam critics.yet it's already been forgotten over the years.but I do agree with REID 1408 because if you were to remake a classic like this it would not be successful
0:12 Wear a bra!!!!!
@Mikey L
:
Sorry, kiddo, but this is a rated "R" movie. **drags Mikey L from rated "R" movie theatre**
So...old.
some remakes are good but coversongs are fuckin terrible
Were all trailers really so bad in the past?
+El Dot LOL's I guess it was the sh*t if you were livin' back in the olden days!
Pretty much.
This one is quite good, especially for 1971.
I think trailers now days are bad. Back in the day there was suspense. Now they just want to sell the movie so they spoil everything before you see it.
The remake was much better.
No
His biggest weakness was the cliched interaction with female character (often typical of Boomer-era directors with enormous sense of entitlement to women's bodies - you see the same in Lynch movies as well: the obligatory rape scene), without any thought for the story. It's a device of totally lazy writing and there's was a perverse fixation on it across movies film the 70s to 80s.
There hsve been no REAL revolutionary movie making in over 70 years quite frankly and that's due in large part by that era of directors getting in the way of good storytelling rather than doing it. The worst are the incredibly pretentious movies made by rube directors whose movies look like a 10 year old with mommy issues was doing the editing and videography. They're. SO boring for all their "surrealistic" *bullshit*.
I agree to some extent that many movies from this era had some sexist attitudes but this is still a pretty bad take. Sam Peckinpah was born in the 20s and therefore not a boomer and ironically, your comment about there being no real revolutionary movie making in over 70 years is more pretentious than anything Boomer era directors ever showed in their movies.
The use of the word "bodies" tells me you have swallowed a lot of Cultural Studies bullshit