Gaussian Integral [Int{e^-x^2} from -inf to inf]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
  • In this video, I showed how to integrate e^-x^2 from -infinity to infinity and get sqrt pi as answer

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @lukaskamin755
    @lukaskamin755 3 місяці тому +11

    Would be interesting to recollect how Jacobian is introduced, and how it's inferred in general

  • @znhait
    @znhait Рік тому +20

    Great explanation. One wouldn’t even need to know multivariable calculus to understand this.

  • @briandong7584
    @briandong7584 Місяць тому +1

    Very smart. The result sqrt(pi) is related to circle or polar coordinates. Coordinates conversion simplifies the solution.

  • @Roydrigo100
    @Roydrigo100 4 місяці тому +3

    The Best! I'm a Brazilian fan!

  • @BernardoLameiras
    @BernardoLameiras Місяць тому

    Your explanations are perfect!

  • @tcmxiyw
    @tcmxiyw Місяць тому

    Great explanation and blackboard technique!

  • @Aelcyx
    @Aelcyx 21 день тому

    Great videos!

  • @akeredoluoluwasogo9654
    @akeredoluoluwasogo9654 Місяць тому

    Does that mean I have to watch like 2 other videos just to understand the full concept?

  • @WingedShell82
    @WingedShell82 4 місяці тому

    when you said the jacobian could be shown in a different video, I got sad cause that's what I wanted to see lol
    otherwise, this was cool to watch :)
    I've used the gaussian integral a bit recently in my physics classes, but never really knew where it came from.
    Also, sqrt(pi)/2 is (1/2)! I assume they're related.

  • @masoudhabibi700
    @masoudhabibi700 Рік тому +3

    For the first person tanks for an other video ..teacher

  • @renesperb
    @renesperb Місяць тому

    This is really the way to do it !

  • @Nobodyman181
    @Nobodyman181 3 місяці тому +1

    Ur greatest funny mathematican

  • @costelnica3988
    @costelnica3988 Рік тому

    Respect! Multumesc din Romania!

  • @kingbeauregard
    @kingbeauregard Рік тому +2

    I remember when I thought this technique smacked of trickery. Then I learned of Feynmann's technique and the world stopped making sense altogether.

  • @marcinandrzejak7155
    @marcinandrzejak7155 4 місяці тому

    One thing that is passed without saying explicitly is that Z is an integer in this derivation. This is therefore not a general definition

  • @kemalbarishatipoglu1714
    @kemalbarishatipoglu1714 3 місяці тому

    You are so so great guy!! Thank you :))

  • @prakashlakhapate1598
    @prakashlakhapate1598 2 місяці тому

    Thanks for arranging this.

  • @prakashlakhapate1598
    @prakashlakhapate1598 2 місяці тому +2

    Prove that dx.dy=rdr.d(Theta)

  • @creslucas5357
    @creslucas5357 4 місяці тому

    Great explanation!

  • @nickzadeh7082
    @nickzadeh7082 2 місяці тому

    Recently is solved by Double integral and transfer it to polar ordinance and no need use IxI ?

  • @ИринаРзаева-ф2с
    @ИринаРзаева-ф2с Місяць тому +1

    Из 3,14 а частицы начинают с 2.

  • @carlosfox8201
    @carlosfox8201 4 місяці тому

    Bless You!

  • @joelmacinnes2391
    @joelmacinnes2391 6 місяців тому +1

    I saw a sped up proof of this and it was going into matrices and all sorts, has anyone come across that before?

    • @j3y445
      @j3y445 5 місяців тому

      The matrix was likely used to compute the Jacobian. The determinant of the Jacobian matrix yields the scale factor of the linear transformation essentially.

  • @physicsclasswithputisir5594
    @physicsclasswithputisir5594 2 місяці тому

    Great❤

  • @annanemustaph
    @annanemustaph 5 місяців тому +1

    Nice 🌵

  • @omarmagdi2732
    @omarmagdi2732 4 місяці тому

    Yoooooo.... super cool

  • @osvaldondara605
    @osvaldondara605 Рік тому +2

    How can I integrate (1/(1+e^x))dx

    • @znhait
      @znhait Рік тому +2

      Multiply both the numerator and the denominator by e^(-x), equivalent to multiplying by 1. After that, a substitution will be very obvious.

    • @PrimeNewtons
      @PrimeNewtons  Рік тому +1

      ua-cam.com/video/hUIfJt4k0Hg/v-deo.html

    • @carultch
      @carultch 9 місяців тому

      @@znhait You're right, a substitution did become obvious.