I wish engineers would have made it luxury with car like doors. Because hummer has no enough space for luxury seats all the space is consumed by center bump.
Gotta keep in mind this is from back in the 80s and 90s. Fuel efficiency wasnt a big selling point of american designs at the time, especially with that much torque (as i recall one of the engines looked at was a gasoline design with single digit mileage). Add to that the cost and reliability concerns of outfitting an entire military and all in all the 6.2 was a rather efficient engine averaging 14mpg (with a spread from 4-24mpg, oh the joys of analogue designs). With the added bonus of still working with 3 of its cylinders out of action #zombietruck
Thankyou sir I love hummer very much we get god bless soon met thank sir from india Vijayakumar
I still love them.
My favorite 4*4 ...THE HUMMER H1..(from India)
How come there are no videos of a Hummer with the front window folded down?
Built by a division of Jeep for US Army i read. GM then bought the concept for hard cash and build Humvees and Hummers. Just an oversize Jeep.
I love hummer I traded in my 2015 Dodge Challenger hellcat for a 1996 H 1.
303StreetMachines I love it I get more attention in the hummer then the challenger I miss the speed at times but oh well
I have a 96.. call me 9566058389
I wish engineers would have made it luxury with car like doors. Because hummer has no enough space for luxury seats all the space is consumed by center bump.
[HUMVEE]™
I hate it when people call HMMWV's Hummers, never Known as a Hummer until 1992
150 HP 250 LB Torque and it only gets 13-14 MPG? I mean yeah it was the 1990s but that's fucking terrible lol
The car is almost 3t in weight
6,000 pounds...K. My silverado weighs 6,500 and gets 17 MPG with twice the horsepower and torque.
13 MPG is good!? lol
for something as rough and tough as a hummer(originally built for WAR[Humvee]), yes, i think 13 is petty good.
Gotta keep in mind this is from back in the 80s and 90s. Fuel efficiency wasnt a big selling point of american designs at the time, especially with that much torque (as i recall one of the engines looked at was a gasoline design with single digit mileage). Add to that the cost and reliability concerns of outfitting an entire military and all in all the 6.2 was a rather efficient engine averaging 14mpg (with a spread from 4-24mpg, oh the joys of analogue designs). With the added bonus of still working with 3 of its cylinders out of action #zombietruck
TRUE hummee lovers don't care about the MPG. LOL. ..I LOVE MY YELLOW H2