Juzear Butterfly 61T Review & Comparison | vs. DaVinci, Studio 4, Blessing 2, Kato & XENNS UP
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
- This video is a review and comparison of the Juzear Butterfly 61T hybrid IEM against the DUNU DaVinci, XENNS UP, Softears Studio 4, Moondrop Blessing 2, and Moondrop Kato.
Check out my frequency response graphs here: atechreviews.s...
For those interested in sending review samples, please contact me at atechreviewsmedia@gmail.com
How does it it compare against HYPE 4. Everyone thinks hype 4 is the best all-rounder
I don't own the Hype 4; I only had the chance to listen to it during CanJam, and it left a strong impression on me. According to my notes, I found that sometimes the treble could be too aggressive for my taste, but overall, it was acceptable. I agree that it's a great all-rounder, but personally, I think it's a bit pricey for its sound. Comparing it to the 61T isn't entirely fair due to the price difference and driver configuration, but I'll share my thoughts.
Honestly, I still believe the Hype 4 is superior overall (except for the occasional overly aggressive treble). Its tuning is slightly similar to the 61T, but the Hype 4 has a more impactful bass, clearer vocals, and greater mid-range detail. In terms of technicalities, instrument separation, and detail retrieval, the Hype 4 is better, although the 61T is not far behind. The 61T is perhaps the most detailed IEM I've heard in its price range, often competing with more expensive IEMs in terms of tonality and technical performance. I find the 61T impressive because it comes close to matching higher-end IEMs at almost half the price, which is remarkable.
In some aspects, the 61T even outperforms the Hype 4, such as in sub-bass performance, bass texture, soundstage depth, treble smoothness, lack of harshness, and passive noise isolation. These qualities contribute to a more immersive music experience for me. I hope this helps!
@@AtechreviewsThank you.... Sorry could you compare Butterfly vs DaVinci and SM4 .... I want to get one of these or is there a better one.
@@KarthikGRisKGR I just A/B compared them right now. The DaVinci has significantly more bass, to the extent that it's consistently noticeable during music playback. This bass is of exceptionally high quality. While it is slightly more detailed than the 61T, this may be harder to discern due to the dominant bass presence. Its bass may not suit every music genre, but it certainly adds a fun element. On the other hand, the 61T's bass is just right-not overwhelming, but sufficiently textured. Personally, I prefer the mid-range and treble of the Juzear 61T. Overall, I really appreciate the 61T. It's a top-notch IEM, scoring a perfect 10/10 for its price point IMO.
I didn't care for the SuperMix 4; I found its bass lacked impact and slam, its mid-range was overly shouty, and its treble was bright and sharp. It struggled to maintain detail during complex music passages. In my opinion, the EA500 LM sounds much better. Of course, this is just my personal preference.
On the other hand, the 61T excels in every aspect. Its sub-bass and mid-bass are notably superior, while its mid-range and treble are finely tuned to avoid any shoutiness, sharpness, or sibilance. Additionally, it offers superior technical performance, soundstage, imaging, and noise isolation. I hope this helps!
@@KarthikGRisKGR I just got my 61t yesterday. I'm relatively new to this, but I was surprised that the sound stage and bass are immediately noticeable better on the 61t, compared to the SM4. The vocal is less forward, less stand-out, but blends in better. The bass is definitely attention grabbing, and this is the first time that I noticed bass can be well separated and textured. I like the SM4 and I like this. They are a bit different but also close lol. I'm not sure what to do - I might return the 61t and get the Davinci. One thing to note is that SM4 is much more compact and lighter than the 61t. 61t didn't bother me comfort wise, but when doing A/B with SM4, you notice how easy that SM4 just disappears in your ear.
From what I have read and heard, you can get the Ziigaat Doscinco which is basically 85-90% of the hype 4, a little more bassy and for $150~ less. Additionally, there are many forums that talk about how since the drivers used in the Doscinco are high quality, it is easy to EQ it to the hype for as well.
Great review! Never heard of this brand before! Still can't believe the amount of competition in this space!
Same here. This is the first IEM I've tried from them, and just wow! It should cost more. I can't wait for others and reviewers to share their opinions. I believe we've discovered something special here.
TD Monk has a review on this one as well.
@@Atechreviews Don't say it should cost more 🤫
@@rinderkappajoe LOL, OK 😀🤐
New sub here. The way you answer every question is quite impressive.
Thanks!
Man this is one of my favorite recent releases. Good take.
Thanks!
Do you prefer the 61T or the Hype 4? What are their differences? Thanks, great review!
+1 for this comparison
This!👍🏻
I don't own the Hype 4; I only had the chance to listen to it during CanJam, and it left a strong impression on me. According to my notes, I found that sometimes the treble could be too aggressive for my taste, but overall, it was acceptable. I agree that it's a great all-rounder, but personally, I think it's a bit pricey for its sound. Comparing it to the 61T isn't entirely fair due to the price difference and driver configuration, but I'll share my thoughts.
Honestly, I still believe the Hype 4 is superior overall (except for the occasional overly aggressive treble). Its tuning is slightly similar to the 61T, but the Hype 4 has a more impactful bass, clearer vocals, and greater mid-range detail. In terms of technicalities, instrument separation, and detail retrieval, the Hype 4 is better, although the 61T is not far behind. The 61T is perhaps the most detailed IEM I've heard in its price range, often competing with more expensive IEMs in terms of tonality and technical performance. I find the 61T impressive because it comes close to matching higher-end IEMs at almost half the price, which is remarkable.
In some aspects, the 61T even outperforms the Hype 4, such as in sub-bass performance, bass texture, soundstage depth, treble smoothness, lack of harshness, and passive noise isolation. These qualities contribute to a more immersive music experience for me. I hope this helps!
@@Atechreviews Thank you very much mate. Appreciate the detailed comparison.
@@abhik6503 You're welcome! 🙂
Really interested in your opinions between the 61T and Hype 4. Great review btw!
I don't own the Hype 4; I only had the chance to listen to it during CanJam, and it left a strong impression on me. According to my notes, I found that sometimes the treble could be too aggressive for my taste, but overall, it was acceptable. I agree that it's a great all-rounder, but personally, I think it's a bit pricey for its sound. Comparing it to the 61T isn't entirely fair due to the price difference and driver configuration, but I'll share my thoughts.
Honestly, I still believe the Hype 4 is superior overall (except for the occasional overly aggressive treble). Its tuning is slightly similar to the 61T, but the Hype 4 has a more impactful bass, clearer vocals, and greater mid-range detail. In terms of technicalities, instrument separation, and detail retrieval, the Hype 4 is better, although the 61T is not far behind. The 61T is perhaps the most detailed IEM I've heard in its price range, often competing with more expensive IEMs in terms of tonality and technical performance. I find the 61T impressive because it comes close to matching higher-end IEMs at almost half the price, which is remarkable.
In some aspects, the 61T even outperforms the Hype 4, such as in sub-bass performance, bass texture, soundstage depth, treble smoothness, lack of harshness, and passive noise isolation. These qualities contribute to a more immersive music experience for me. I hope this helps!
@@Atechreviews Oh wow! Thank you for responding to my message and sharing your thoughts! Really appreciate it! Now my interest have peaked for the 61T! Keep on making great review videos. You rock!
Excellent review. And thank you, now I'm confused about choosing between SM4 or 61T 🥲
Thanks! The Studio 4 is essentially an improved version of the 61T in every aspect except for bass. If bass is a priority, then the 61T would be the preferable choice, especially considering it costs almost 50% less. However, in terms of sound quality alone, the Studio 4 is significantly superior in every way and justifies its price point.
@@Atechreviews Thanks for the reply. But what I mean is SuperMix 4. I've had Studio4 for a long time. I previously wrote it wrong, it should be SM4
@@thomasdanny7717 No problem. 🙂I didn't care for the SuperMix 4; I found its bass lacked impact and slam, its mid-range was overly shouty, and its treble was bright and sharp. It struggled to maintain detail during complex music passages. In my opinion, the EA500 LM sounds much better. Of course, this is just my personal preference.
On the other hand, the 61T excels in every aspect. Its sub-bass and mid-bass are notably superior, while its mid-range and treble are finely tuned to avoid any shoutiness, sharpness, or sibilance. Additionally, it offers superior technical performance, soundstage, imaging, and noise isolation.
@@Atechreviews Thank you very much for the detailed explanation. You are my hero 🙏❤️
@@thomasdanny7717 You're more than welcome! 🙂
I really enjoyed this review.
Thanks! 🙂
@Atechreviews I would love to see you review the Dusk 2 compared to Hype4, Studio4 and of course the Pilgrim. Your reviews are great, thanks
Thanks! I don't have the Dusk 2 and Hype 4.
Great review😊
I could tell you really enjoyed this iem from your excitement.
I might just buy them for myself after listening to you 😁
Thanks! Yeah, it's rare to find an IEM that impresses me like that. It has great noise isolation, excellent bass, vocal clarity, and an expansive soundstage with both width and depth. The mid-range is non-shouty, the treble is detailed without being harsh, and it comes with a nice cable. Most impressive of all is the price. The detail retrieval on this IEM surpasses many others in the $300-$400 range.
@@AtechreviewsSounds like a complete package😊. I'll have to wait a month or two for them to be available here, but till then- definately in the shortlist😁
First time seeing your content. Nice review!
I think you mentioned a ranking sheet, but I see a link for that in the description.
Thanks! I'm currently working on my ranking list and will include a link to it in the video description once it's complete.
Great review! I have the Juzear Clear and still feel that its a great value in the sub $50 range.
Thanks! I've been hearing a lot of great things about the Juzear Clear.
Great review. Thanks a bunch. Like it compared to Myer Aaudio Sliivo SL41
Thanks! I don't have that IEM.
I wonder how this compares to the Tea 2 which has the same configuration. Your description of all subjects including soundstage/space is how I feel about the Tea 2.
I don't have the Tea 2 right now.
Funny how a freq response that is almost 100% similar can sound so different. I have no experience with either of those earphones but a single BA and an open full-size planar with a totally flat freq response to 20 Hz sound so different in he bass it's remarkable.
Yeah, I experienced that with many IEMs. Graph looks the same but the sound is completely different.
It seems the UP is still the best out of the Bunch , I would EQ the UP instead of hunting too many mid range IEMs Thank You .
You're right. That is one way of doing it. I often find that using EQ isn't very practical for me, so I prefer IEMs that sound great out of the box. Additionally, if there's a similar-sounding IEM available at a lower cost, I'm all for it.
The HD800 with that 6K spike is so detailed and clear but oh so tiring on the ears. Tinnitus levels. Because of the low distortion, you are easily pushed to high volumes and you pay the price immediately.
After that headphone, I'm weary of 6k spikes.
Yeah, I usually prefer IEMs with a slight dip in that area.
Hi AtechReviews i heard that Juzear Butterfly 61T is better in all aspects than Elysian Pilgrim what are your throughts??? Thanks you your videos are so much good and real love them 🥰
I still favor the Pilgrim due to its superior detail, resolution, imaging, and separation. I also appreciate its upper treble. The 61T is excellent too, with its wider soundstage and more pronounced mid-bass. It's so impressive that I can understand why someone might prefer it over the Pilgrim.
I'm torn between this and AFULExplorer, but I'll probably buy this one.
DaVinci is a little over my budget.
The 61T is a significant upgrade from the Explorer, a big step up in sound quality. The 61T stands out for its superior bass quality and texture, along with more forward vocals and mid-range. It also offers better treble extension. On the other hand, the Explorer has a slightly more intimate and laid-back mid-range, with more relaxed treble giving it a slightly darker presentation.
In terms of technical performance, the 61T excels in detail retrieval and separation. It also has a much wider and deeper soundstage, whereas the Explorer's soundstage is more intimate. I prefer the 61T.
@@Atechreviews Thanks for the helpful comparison.
I would have definitely bought the 61T if I hadn't been stupid enough to notice your reply to my comment after the ...... sale was over.
@@Avira-op1vk Don't worry about it 🙂
Thanks for the great review!
You're welcome! 🙂
What do you think of the 61T vs Tanchjim Origin or the Chopin? Thanks. Appreciate the way you do your reviews.
The Tanchjim Origin excels in detail retrieval, offering exceptional vocal clarity and forwardness. However, its bass is less than my preference and less than than the 61T and Chopin, which can detract from the enjoyment and may not make it the top choice for certain genres. Nevertheless, for most music, it delivers a near-perfect performance.
While the Origin has the best-detailed mid-range compared to the Chopin and 61T, some may find its mid-range too pronounced, especially if they feel the Harman mid-range is already a bit overwhelming. Personally, I found the Origin's mid-range to be perfect. Additionally, the Origin offers a much more cohesive sound signature.
On the other hand, the Chopin is a fantastic all-rounder in my opinion. Its mid-range is cleaner than the 61T, with greater focus, forwardness, and clarity. Many instruments are more prominently placed in the mix with the Chopin. In comparison, the 61T has a slight bass bleed that makes it warmer, with a fuller-bodied sound than the Origin and Chopin. It has delicious sub-bass and superior sound isolation, ensuring it never sounds shouty, even with energetic genres. The 61T also has the best sub-bass quantity, bass texture, soundstage, technical performance, and sound isolation compared to the Chopin and Origin. I hope this helps!
@@Atechreviews Thanks for the amazingly detailed reply buddy. Really appreciate it. Yes it does help immensely. I already own and really enjoy the Origin and used to own the Chopin(gifted it). I'll probably be buying this one. Thanks again!
I'd have appreciated it if you had compared these to the AFUL Explorer since they have very similar tuning. Personally, I prefer the Explorer's tuning as it has flatter upper mids, but they have different hardware. The first has a 10mm DD, while the latter has an 8mm DD, which could result in different low-frequency sound output.
I don't like recessed vocals. So the Aful Explorer is an easy pass.
The 61T is a significant upgrade from the Explorer, a big step up in sound quality. The 61T stands out for its superior bass quality and texture, along with more forward vocals and mid-range. It also offers better treble extension. On the other hand, the Explorer has a slightly more intimate and laid-back mid-range, with more relaxed treble giving it a slightly darker presentation.
In terms of technical performance, the 61T excels in detail retrieval and separation. It also has a much wider and deeper soundstage, whereas the Explorer's soundstage is more intimate. I prefer the 61T.
I've seen mostly positive reviews on the Juzear 41T. But now that the 61T just released, my interest has shifted. Im curious how this compares against the AFUL Performer 5...
I can't believe I forgot about that! I'll compare and listen to them tomorrow, and I'll let you know.
Great question 🤗
After doing a comparison, to my ears, the Juzear 61T excels in both sub-bass and mid-bass, offering superior quantity and quality compared to the Performer 5. In the mid-range, I prefer the 61T for its smoothness and overall detail. However, when it comes to treble, the Performer 5 stands out. There's something unique about AFUL's treble tuning that consistently delivers smoothness and detail, making it particularly special to me. (personal preference)
Regarding detail retrieval, instrument separation, and technicalities, the 61T is clearly superior. The differences are easily noticeable, it is a significant step up to my ears. Additionally, the 61T outperforms in soundstage width and depth, as well as passive noise isolation. Both IEMs are comfortable for me, though the Performer 5 has a smaller shell.
@Atechreviews Nice comparison, I appreciate it. I too have a soft spot for the Performer 5. It's treble is very unique being detailed, yet not harsh.
Thank You For reviewing this Juzear 61T ,I having trouble and spoiled with higher end mid range iems like P8 , Pilgrim , Zenns Top , when i bought the CCA Hydro then i found the separation and Coherence are no good in comparison , do this set have the same problem ? Thank You Again .
You're welcome. I would definitely say no.
Nice video, I'll keep an eye out if it goes on sale. Thoughts on Dunu Titan S2 so far? I'll wait for your video ofc
Yeah, I checked, and unfortunately, it's not on sale right now. However, it might be on sale during the next round. The DUNU Titan S2 has a lot of detail, but I'm listening to various tracks again to determine if the mid-range is forward or too forward. Everything else about it is perfect.
i mean it graphs nicely butt some say it has a tinge of BA timbre.
To be frank, most hybrid IEMs priced under $500 exhibit a slight BA timbre, although this characteristic is more pronounced in certain IEMs like the Quintet, based on my experience. However, the BA timbre in the 61T is extremely subtle. I doubt anyone would notice it unless they directly A/B compare it to more expensive hybrid IEMs.
where can i find your iem ranking list..... your review is excellent
Thanks! I'm currently working on my ranking list and will include a link to it in the video description once it's complete.
I think this one is made by Myer Audio like the Sliivo 41t and others like it.
What makes you say that? I'm genuinely curious.
great review! is this good for heavy metal and orchestral music?
Thanks! Let me tell you, it's flawless. The mid-range and treble are tuned to avoid any hint of shoutiness, harshness, or sibilance, while retaining exceptional vocal clarity, detail, and instrument separation. It performs wonderfully even with symphonic metal.
@@Atechreviews oh man, that sounds great, im currently trying to decide between this and the davinci. davinci seems a little bit better over all but on the other hand its also 100$ more expensive. some people even say the aful explorer is pretty similar to the 61t, dont know if thats true tho...
@@thecolonel8144 I own the Explorer, 61T, and DaVinci IEMs. If you're into metal and orchestral music, the Explorer and 61T are your best options. While I love the DaVinci, it's not ideal for these genres. Instead, it excels in hip-hop, EDM, movies, and anything with heavy bass content.
Think of the 61T as an enhanced Ultra HD version of the Explorer. It offers better detail, a much wider soundstage, and more clarity and air without ever becoming harsh. Both the Explorer and 61T remain smooth and non-shouty, making them perfect for metal genres.
The Explorer has a more relaxed and laid-back mid-range, while the 61T makes instruments like the electric guitar more enjoyable. The Explorer's treble is more subdued, whereas the 61T's treble is present but never harsh. The Explorer offers a more intimate soundstage, while the 61T provides a wider soundstage with a good sense of depth. The 61T also has much better noise isolation.
In terms of sound quality, the 61T is significantly superior to the Explorer. While I love the Explorer, the difference in quality between them is substantial.
@@Atechreviews thank you so much for the detailed answer, this helped me a lot, really appreciate it! one last question tho, do you think the 61T does also work well with movie and game soundtracks/soundscapes?
@@thecolonel8144 Yes.
Is this like the pula 02?
It's much better than the PULA 02, despite having a similar tonality. The 61T has superior detail retrieval, bass texture, sub-bass, instrument separation, timbre, soundstage, and sound isolation.
Amazing Review! Does it make sense to upgrade from Truthear X Crinacle Zero:Red to Juzear 61T?
Yes of course!
Certainly. It's an improvement in every aspect.
Awesome review, I wanted to ask: you rightfully stated that studio 4 and xenns up are better but are they $200/$300 better in your opinion?
Thank you. Whether the Studio 4 and Xenns Up are $200/$300 better is subjective and depends on individual preferences. Personally, when it comes to the XENNS UP, I don't believe they are worth the extra cost, which is why I gave them away. While I don't regret owning them, I feel that there are now IEMs on the market, like the 61T, that offer similar sound quality for a fraction of the price.
On the other hand, when it comes to the Studio 4, my opinion is a resounding yes. The improvements it offers over the 61T are significant and make it a much better IEM. In my experience, the Studio 4 has truly stood the test of time and is not just hype. It is an IEM that I believe is worth every penny. To truly appreciate it, you have to try it yourself; words and reviews alone don't do it justice.
@@Atechreviews thank you that was very thorough!! I hope I’ll be able to try them, we have little group of iem lovers in my city where we get to try and exchange stuff so fingers crossed 🤞
@@TomatePasFraiche You're welcome! Best of luck to you, my friend.
Awesome review
Thanks!
Hi bro! How they are for metal! Good luck, shaking hands bro!
Shaking hands👋🤝It is great for metal. The bass is robust, the mid-range is clear without being shouty, and the treble is detailed, offering plenty of resolution. The mid-range is more balanced and not forward which makes it not shouty. The Binary DynaQuattro has a more forward mid-range if you prefer a vocal presentation that is more forward.
My 61T arrived yesterday. If the DaVinci has more bass than the 61T, im going to skip it. The same thing happened to me with the New Adonis. The bass is just too overwhelming and takes away from the experience.
The DaVinci has significantly more bass than the 61T, like way more.
Awesome review 👍
How is this set compared to bqeyz wind and hidiz mp145? Either is my next purchase.
Thanks! I don't own either of those IEMs, but I've heard many positive things about the MP145.
@@Atechreviews alright, thanks 👍
How would you compare this to the Sliivo Sl41 or the Pula P02?
I don't have the SL41, but I can compare the 61T to the PULA PA02. The 61T has a stronger bass response and better technicalities. It's got a warmer sound, with a bit of bass bleed that adds a fuller and warmer tone to the lower mid-range. The 61T also stands out in technicalities, with much more detail retrieval, a wider and deeper soundstage, better imaging, and better sound isolation.
How are the driver flex, microphonics and comfort?
I didn’t have any issues with driver flex on my set, probably because it has a vent that’s meant to help with that. The cable is free of microphonics too. Comfort-wise, they’re great for me, though the 6.5mm nozzle is on the medium to large side.
Hi man, nice review. How much for your Xenns Up? ;)
Thanks! Unfortunately, they are gone :(
How does it compare to the aful explorer? Good bass and fighting off sibilance well is a reason I’m quite interested in both of these, I listen to mostly metal so too much brightness can be absolute murder 😂
I also listen to metal music. Both the Explorer and 61T are excellent choices for this genre. The 61T stands out for its superior bass quality and texture, along with more forward vocals and mid-range. It also offers better treble extension. On the other hand, the Explorer has a slightly more intimate and laid-back mid-range, with more relaxed treble giving it a slightly darker presentation.
In terms of technical performance, the 61T excels in detail retrieval and separation. It also has a much wider and deeper soundstage, whereas the Explorer's soundstage is more intimate.
I can't choose between 61t and pilgrim.
Could you compare them?
The Pilgrim has better bass detail and better overall resolution, with superior treble extension compared to the 61T. It presents a slightly brighter sound signature, contrasting with the 61T's warmer tone, increased bass presence, improved sound isolation, and deeper soundstage.
Hey mate, have you heard the tsmr x...would love to know your thoughts on it.
No, I haven't.
Looking at the graph first few secs,, I thought, this is a direct competitor to the Da Vinci, but cheaper and with a better cable ... hows nozzle comfort and such?
The nozzle fit is excellent and comfort is top notch. I don't even feel the 61T in my ear.
Could u by chance also comment on how they compare to the Aful performer 5/Kinera Celest Relentless?
They seem to be in a similar price bracket with that warm sound signature. What do u think between these 3 is good?
The Celest Relentless has a V-shaped sound signature with strong bass and plenty of detail, but the treble can be a bit bright with some music. Choosing between the Performer 5 and the 61T comes down to personal preference. I find the Performer 5 has smoother, more detailed treble, but its bass is a bit lighter than I’d like. Overall, it’s excellent and very detailed, plus it’s more comfortable. On the other hand, the 61T offers better noise isolation, more impactful bass, superior detail retrieval, and a wider and deeper soundstage. It somehow feels more immersive to me. All three IEMs are great choices, but I prefer the 61T.
@@Atechreviews thank you for your reply. Have a nice day ❤️
Nice review.I have small shallow ears.The nozzle apart from wide is also long , normal or shorty ?
I believe it is quite short, measuring precisely 4.6mm tall with my digital caliper. For comparison, the Elysian Pilgrim measures 5.2mm tall. The 61T is very comfortable in my ear with all the ear tips I've tried.
@@AtechreviewsThat's good news..I have had 41t but I lost it it was nice but for relax listening..Thanks for the answer keep the nice reviews I saw almost all of them..👍
@@anatol1204 Thanks a lot! I truly appreciate your support. 😊 I hope my reviews are helpful and useful to you in some way.
@@Atechreviews Yes they are very helpful we have also similar taste..I want to buy an "end game" iem to hear all genres but mostly classical music and pop- rock but I think I will wait for the Oracle mk lll.If it s not a good upgrade(like the mk ll..) I lean towards u61t Mega5est (custom) or studio 4..To be honest I m trying to hold myself back from buying it because now it has a good discount on HIFIGO..👀Thanks again!
im hearing from a lot of sources the 61t suffers from not being properly vented and make horrible pressure in ear......
I didn’t experience any pressure issues with my set, but to be clear, I generally don’t have problems with most all BA IEMs. The 61T includes a relief vent near the back of the earpiece, next to the 2-pin connector. This vent helps with driver movement and acts as a relief vent, but But maybe for some people, they prefer more venting to avoid pressure buildup issues.
How this compared to performer 5 ? I can get performer 5 for $100 2nd hand
It has better bass, sound stage, isolation, and detail retrieval compared to the Performer 5. The Performer 5 has a different treble presentation that is smooth yet detailed.
Do you have a ranking list? Where can I find it? Or is it not made/finalized yet
It's not finalized yet, but I'll be releasing it shortly and updating it as I progress.
Would it be okay to bug you for a comparison against the Kiwi Orchestra Lite?
The Juzear 61T sounds slightly warmer, has higher quality bass, better sound isolation, significantly reduced BA timbre, and vastly superior technical performance and detail retrieval.
@@Atechreviews thank you for the response. I put my order in a week ago!
On sale now !
Where?
@@danm203 AliExpress
Aliexpress in Sommer sale
Thanks for sharing! 👍
Did you notice anything about the vent or pressure build up? Can you tell if its vented?
I didn't notice any pressure buildup at all. It is vented.
I own 50+ sets, the 61T has the head-stage I've been searching for. Have you experienced this type of depth and immersion in any other set?
I have experienced immersion like that in some IEMs like Studio 4 but I haven't personally come across that type of depth before. I've heard IEMs with wider soundstage like the Campfire Andromeda and DUNU Glacier, and others that are more holographic such as the UM MEST MK II and III, but none that blend width and depth as exceptionally as this one. It's truly unique in that aspect.
@Atechreviews not to mention the drastic price difference. Great job Juzear!
can you compare it to supermix 4?
I didn't care for the SuperMix 4; I found its bass lacked impact and slam, its mid-range was overly shouty, and its treble was bright and sharp. It struggled to maintain detail during complex music passages. In my opinion, the EA500 LM sounds much better. Of course, this is just my personal preference.
On the other hand, the 61T excels in every aspect. Its sub-bass and mid-bass are notably superior, while its mid-range and treble are finely tuned to avoid any shoutiness, sharpness, or sibilance. Additionally, it offers superior technical performance, soundstage, imaging, and noise isolation.
Bass bleed only happens at medium volumes .
That's correct. For me, I start to notice bass bleed at medium volumes, and it becomes more prominent and overpowering at higher volumes.
@Atechreviews yes because the treble ans upper mids don't require air flow. So the higher you go the 1k to 16k goes up like crazy. I use filters inside the noozle or outside to lower that frequency
How do these compare to CCA Hydro?
I haven't tried the Hydro, but I've heard good things about it.
Oh god another flava of the month, can they chill out
This year has been out of control!
Just buy mest mk2 and quit the hobby
@@heyking8583Im actually thinking of doing that
😄
Excellent review, thanks!
Thanks for watching!
How this compares with quintet?
It is better than the Quintet in every aspect: bass, mid-range, treble, timbre, and detail.
@@Atechreviews is it worth to upgrade for?
@@ogemmi Yes.
@@Atechreviews thanks