Actually if you take into account the cable, and accessories, 300$ is a steal. Sound wise, I was torn between Hype4, Pilgrim, and Dusk, but honestly I don't really trust Moondrop QC, I got one of their products dying just few weeks ago.
Moondrop sent me a fake tracking code on AliExpress and then lied about it being shipped out when I asked them. The Simgot options are interesting, too, but their QC has not been great in my experience.
Same for me. When dusk was first announced i was going to get it but then read all the issues and complaints. But now im torn between hype4 or davinci. Davinci has so much value for just $300 with all the accessories it comes with, but its tuning for the higher frequencies isnt my preference. But, the hype4 is exactly my tuning preference with a bigger sound stage but it doesnt come with all the same accessories😭
I agree, it's an incredible deal. When I listen to it and see the faceplates and accessories, I feel it should cost much more. It competes with higher-priced IEMs in terms of sound quality, cable, and overall build quality. DUNU and Gizaudio really hit a homerun with the DaVinci.
And you can also ask customer service for a free pair of Divinus Velvet Eartips. I placed order today and they were kind enough to give me a pair. Thanks Hifigo
Thank you for this very in depth review. I am currently going back whether I should buy the DaVinci oder the SA6 MKII. Your comparisson really helped, I might go for the DaVince for commuting and work first and just later on get the MKII. Keep up the great reveiws!
@@apothecy4011 I tried the Chu II DSP and have to say, the app as well as the cable itself were really bad IMO. I heard the Dusk only sounds "worth the price" with the DSP so it gets a NO from me. Elysian I heard had some QC issues in the past so I am still uncertain about anything from them
@@Joshua-e7j4h Cable is a gamble. Some are good, and some aren't. App is shit. Dusk + DSP without any QC problem = a tad better than the Prestige LTD (due to bass) and less technical than the Pilgrim Noir with everything else equal to it.
Thank you for your kind words! I'm glad my review helped you with your decision. I agree, SA6 MKII can always be a future addition and an upgrade. Enjoy your new IEMs 🙂
@@sleepyrhythms6668I like the DaVinci for music that emphasizes bass or has a heavy low-end presence, such as movies, soundtracks, hip-hop, and electronic music. The bass, though more than I typically prefer, is incredibly enjoyable and enhances the overall music experience. 100% of the time, I prefer the SA6 MK II. The bass on the SA6 MK II is superbly balanced, and its level of detail and smoothness is extraordinary. The clarity and accuracy are beyond words. It fits almost like a custom-molded IEM, offers excellent isolation, and is easy to drive. It just sounds right and so clear. The DaVinci is there for those moments where I crave boosted bass.
@@Atechreviews I agree about the SA6 MKII. It scales incredibly well and is the reason I sold my Monarch MKII after receiving them. Currently running off a DX320 with Korg NuTubes. Do you recommend getting the DaVinci when I already own these? Are they colored enough to make bad recordings sound good?
for checking depth layering (and bass impact) i recommend James Horner - Hector's Death (Troy - Music From The Motion Picture). great reviews! Dusk comparison with analog cable?
Thanks a lot for the recommendation. I'll check it out and use it in the future. The Dusk has better treble, they share a similar mid-range, but the DaVinci really shines with its richer and more abundant bass. In terms of detail, the Dusk might slightly edge ahead, especially in the treble region.
You're welcome! If you're comfortable with the bass, which is excellent but not excessive, I'd recommend going for it. It's the best IEM I can suggest under $300 and is well-suited for many genres. It's also one of the most enjoyable IEMs I've experienced. I'm keeping mine; they're that impressive. A true all-rounder.
The DaVinci will play all genres well, no doubt, but if it happens that your playlist leans a bit more into Pop, Hip-Hop, and Electronic music, then the DaVinci will likely make you even more happy for a long time.
Great Review! I usually listen to female vocals like Ariana Grande, Twice, Halsey, or just Disney songs(yeah I know, childish~) and such. Do you think these iems are a good fit for those. If not, can you recommend something in the 200-300$ price range, because I just wanna buy one iem and be satisfied with it. Thanks, much appreciated.
To your description I can't think of a better candidate than the Pula PA02 (the same model you can also get under the name Myer Audio Sliivo D41). Costs 150-180$ depending where you buy it. Well spent money and female vocals shine with it... as well as many other aspects like bass, treble, separation, soundstage... Really one of the best IEMs you can buy under 200.
Hello there, nothing is childish about enjoying Disney songs or any other music. We all have our tastes. If you mainly listen to female vocals like Ariana Grande, Twice, and Halsey, the bass-heavy DUNU DaVinci might not be the best fit. The strong bass emphasis could overshadow the clarity and detail in the mid-range, which is essential for enjoying vocals. While the DaVinci does offer clear and natural-sounding vocals, the bass might be a bit too much for your preference (though I personally love it). For a more balanced sound that highlights vocals while still providing good bass, I recommend considering the Binary Chopin. It has a vocal-forward sound signature with great clarity and detail retrieval and excellent treble extension, enhancing the enjoyment of female vocals. The PULA PA02 is another great option, though it offers slightly less detail. The Truthear Nova is a third option, with less bass and slightly thin-sounding vocals and instruments, but it can still perform well with some EQ adjustments. Of all these, I would personally choose the Binary Chopin for what you described. It falls within the $200-300 price range and offers excellent mid-range performance, ensuring that vocals sound clear and engaging without being overwhelmed by bass and has a lot of clarity and air. Hope this helps!
Great point! Let me start by saying that the HiSenior Mega5est is a great IEM, but it leans a bit too dark for my taste. The difference between the HiSenior Mega5est and the DUNU DaVinci is like night and day. 1. The HiSenior Mega5est tends to sound a bit dark, while the DUNU DaVinci offers better detailed treble and instrument separation. This could be due to the 5-way crossover or the use of multiple acoustic tubes. 2. The DUNU DaVinci is also more resolving, providing greater detail retrieval than the Mega5est. This difference is quite noticeable to my ears. 3. The bass quality is where the DaVinci truly shines. Its bass is rich in texture, detail, separation, rumble, and tactility. I can feel it as well as hear it and it is so satisfying. 4. The vocals on the DaVinci are so rich and natural. The DaVinci has a natural timbre to it that makes vocals and instruments sound natural. 5. The DUNU DaVinci looks better (subjectively to me), has better accessories and comes with a high quality interchangeable termination cable. After comparing both, I personally prefer the DaVinci and would choose it even if both IEMs were priced the same.
@@Hijynx87 better. More sub and mid bass than p8. It’s really good. The more I listen, the more I like it. Problem is I’m comparing it to 1k plus iems. It holds its own in some aspects though
I completely agree with you-adding more mid-bass would make it perfect. It already has a fantastic sub-bass rumble, clear vocals, and excellent resolution. It truly holds its own against IEMs priced over $1k.
@@shaunbrady15 Me too. I mean it 100%. It sounds even better to me than IEMs that cost $1600. It is Energetic, airy, detailed, yet never harsh. That is the Elysian house sound for you 🙂
Amazing review, How would you compare it with the Thieaudio Hype 4 and Moondrop Crinacle Dusk ? I can't decide between DaVinci and these 2 both IEMs, please you or someone help me to decide!
The difference between the two is like night and day. The DaVinci really shines with its bass-it’s more detailed, textured, and has a much stronger impact. Vocals are clearer, more forward, and the instruments feel better separated. You also get a lot more detail with the DaVinci overall, making the sound quality much better. That said, the 61T does a great job with isolation and has a deeper, more immersive soundstage up front.
You'll need either a DAC/Amp or a basic dongle. I typically use the AFUL SnowyNight along with the FiiO BTR7 for portable use. However, there are other cheaper options available, such as the Moondrop Dawn Pro and Roselsa 9039, which allow you to use the 4.4mm and provide more than enough power. Any basic dongle will suffice, and you can always upgrade later if you wish.
Hey man, can you answer this question? Does Davinci offer a sound presentation that is wide and wraps around the head, putting your IN the music, or does it put the music at a distance in front of your face? Hope that makes sense.
The DaVinci offers a sound presentation that is wide and immersive, wrapping around your head. It creates a spacious and engaging soundstage with good depth, making you feel like you're part of the music rather than having it at a distance in front of you. Hope that helps!
Appreciate this review, am looking at either the Davinci or the Explorer! Which would you say is less warm and more neutral/balanced as I dislike the typical muddy bloat that some bassy iems have.
First of all, neither of them are muddy or bloated. Both are balanced IEMs with a bass boost. The difference is that the DaVinci has more forward vocals and greater treble extension, offering more treble and vocal clarity as well as better resolution and detail retrieval. The DaVinci also has slightly more bass with a stronger slam and rumble. In contrast, the Explorer is less warm and doesn't strike me as a bass-heavy IEM. While it does have pronounced bass, it's balanced with the rest of the frequencies. The DaVinci is also balanced with a bass boost, but the bass stands out and grabs your attention most of the time. (in a good way) Hope this helps!
@@Atechreviews Thanks for the detailed response! In this case, I'll most likely wait for an audition unit for the Davinci. If I find it too warm/bassy, then will get the Explorer! Appreciate your replies!
@@calvinlooi4500 not sure which one you chose. I had the same dilemma. I went with the explorers and they are damn amazing. Put my lovely Katos away sadly. I did not want to pull the trigger onto a 300euro iem blindly so I went with a similar cheaper iem, but I know I will go to DaVinci down the road. 11.11 is nearby 😁
I returned the Juzear 61t and got the Davinci. I like it better than the Juzear. When I use the S&S tip L size, I feel I'm getting a comfortable seal but I find the noise isolation is rather poor, I can still hear ambient noise. What tips are you using now? And the nozzle is hella big, took me a while to put the S&S on, such a workout lol.
Thanks for sharing! We all have our preferences, and I'm glad you've found yours and enjoy it. 🙂 I agree about the nozzle size; it's on the larger side, but once you put on the ear tips, they stay in place, which works for me. I use the largest size of the DUNU S&S tips. They're one of my favorites, providing comfort and an excellent seal. Regarding noise isolation, I'd say it's pretty good and comparable to most other IEMs. I can't hear most ambient noises, or they're significantly muffled. The 61T offers above-average passive noise isolation, so if you're comparing, the DaVinci might seem less isolating.
You're probably right and I have reached the same conclusion. I find the implementation to be vastly superior to the isobaric double dynamic driver. The DaVinci's bass offers incredible texture and separation.
The DaVinci offers more bass with superior quality, delivering better slam, punch, and impact. Its lower mid-range sounds natural and slightly warmer. In contrast, the Quintet has a more pronounced 4-10kHz region, making it more fatiguing over time. The Quintet also exhibits some BA timbre, which doesn't sound as natural to me, while the DaVinci sounds incredibly natural and realistic. Additionally, the DaVinci provides a wider soundstage with good depth and significantly better detail retrieval than the Quintet.
If you're seeking clarity and detail and aren't concerned about bass, the Tanchjim Origin is the ideal choice. However, if you prefer more low end, then the DaVinci would be the better option.
I just listened to the Studio 4 for the first time yesterday. I plan to continue listening for a few days to form a more accurate impression before comparing it. For now, DaVinci has way more bass.
Is anyone else having a hard time fitting these in their ear canal? The port itself is HUGE and i've tried all of the tips... it hurts to try to press it in and I just feel metal and the thing is not sitting flush in my ear at all.
Thank you for this comparison, cause you're responding the question i was wondering. I have the Sa6 ultra that i love, and want to find an iem with more bass for watching movies and for some genres of music. I was esitating betwin fatfreq maestro mini and the da vinci, i think the Da Vinci will be a good choice.
You're welcome! I haven't had the chance to listen to the FatFreq Maestro Mini, so I can't comment on its sound. Like you, I use IEMs for watching movies, and this is where the DaVinci truly excels with its strong bass performance and clarity. While the SA6 Ultra offers more detail, the DUNU DaVinci brings more enjoyment and satisfaction for movies and specific music genres. It has no harshness or sibilance, is comfortable, detailed, and can be used for hours. I really think it's hard to beat at this price.
In my opinion, the DaVinci excels in both sub-bass and mid-bass, delivering superior quality and quantity compared to the Mega5est. The difference is significant. Vocal clarity is also better on the DaVinci, as the Mega5est's bass tends to overshadow the mid-range, affecting vocal clarity. Although the DaVinci has more bass, it never overshadows the mids for me. Even the sub-bass and mid-bass are well-separated, possibly due to the 5-way crossover. Additionally, the mid-range on the Mega5est sounds too laid back for my preference, whereas the DaVinci offers a balanced mid-range-neither too forward nor recessed. While I prefer more vocal forwardness, the DaVinci provides good clarity and separation, ensuring the vocals don't feel lacking. The treble on the Mega5est sounded too smooth and a bit dark to me, and attempts to EQ it made it sibilant. The DaVinci's treble is okay, though slightly too close to my ears. The DaVinci also sounds much more resolving than the Mega5est, which has below-average technicalities for its price. Overall, the Mega5est is smooth and bassy, with laid-back mid-range and vocals, but lacks detail and a modular cable. DaVinci has much more bass (could be too much for some people), better bass, more vocal clarity, better treble clarity, detail retrieval and instrument separation. The difference is not small. If you own the Mega5est, don't worry-it's a good IEM, but the tuning and technicalities just aren't for me.
Is the details that good asking cause i want to know if this is good for gaming and music basically and all rounder been hearing hype 4 and em10 are for gaming and music just wondering how these play in to the mix
Exceeding expectations, the technicalities are impressive for the price point. The imaging and spatial cues are excellent, with a detailed low end that makes it easier to hear footsteps and other subtle sounds. The treble is smooth, not harsh, and the overall comfort makes this, in my opinion, a perfect set for gaming.
The Chopin offers less bass and more forward vocals, with slightly less detail retrieval. I feel the DaVinci is safer for Kpop/Jpop and the bass adds a lot to the enjoyment.
Honestly, while the SA6 MK II is a fantastic IEM that I'll never part with, the Glacier is on a different level entirely. In terms of tonality, the Glacier has a stronger and cleaner bass, a more forward mid-range for vocal clarity, and airy EST treble. The Glacier sounds incredibly realistic and detailed, it has an endgame level of detail retrieval. The SA6 MK II has impressive detail, likely surpassing most IEMs under $1000, but it doesn't quite match the Glacier. It offers better isolation, and although the bass is excellent, it doesn't reach the quality of the Glacier's dynamic driver bass. Additionally, the SA6 MK II's mid-range is more relaxed and not as forward, though still detailed. The SA6 MK II has a better fit. Both IEMs are outstanding.
really torn between hype 4's and these. i can get the hype 4's for possibly the same price and I have good spare cables so dont care about accesories. any advice?
I don't have the Hype 4, so I can't comment on its sound quality. Personally, I prefer buying new IEMs, and I believe paying more should be worth it. Perhaps someone who has experience with both can share their insights.
Thanks for the tip! 🙂 I recently got a new mic and use both a foam cover and windscreen. The issue was that I was too close to the microphone. When I stepped back, my voice sounded too distant. I'll work on finding a better balance to make it more comfortable to listen to in the future. Thanks again for your input. 🙂
Can anyone compare Davinci with Doscinco and Hype 4? I think such comparisons will be most relevant for those who are looking for good hybrids with powerful bass. In this video, for some reason, the reviewer compares thick with green, and liquid with warm.
Doscinco has a thicker bass but it isn't as technical, refined or smooth in the treble. I think both DaVinci & Hype 4 are a step up from it, more drivers too.
@@phetmoz 1. Thicker as in more bass or sounds more full? (Hard to know what everyone thinks when using similar words haha) 2. If you had to pick one between the 3 you mentioned for Electronic, EDM, Rock and R&B... which way would you go and why?
@@AtechreviewsYou are comparing headphones that sound too different in nature. There are no alternative hybrids with powerful bass dual DD in the review.
I don't have the Hype 4 so I can't comment on its sounds quality. The Elysian Pilgrim IEM has better sub-bass rumble and more resolution and detail but less mid-bass compared to the DaVinci. The Pilgrim is more balanced and smoother with excellent clarity, making it suitable for long listening sessions. While the Pilgrim excels in sub-bass, the DaVinci offers a thicker, richer sound that is enjoyable across various genres. The Elysian Pilgrim is an upgrade in sound quality to my ears. The DaVinci has a higher quantity of bass, while the Pilgrim has a higher quality bass and more air up top. The Pilgrim has much higher resolution and detail retrieval compared to the DaVinci but its mid-bass is more neutral.
@@yoditonugrahacky765 I have and enjoy both as they have different sound signatures, so here's a simple breakdown for you: The Pilgrim has a neutral mid-bass. If you prefer slightly more bass than neutral, the DaVinci is a better choice as it offers more bass. DaVinci is great for bass heavy genres and movies. The bass is the star of the show with the DaVinci. However, if you prioritize detail retrieval and overall resolution in a more balanced sound signature, then the Pilgrim is the way to go.
The DaVinci does not have more bass than the Explorer; the quantity is exactly the same. However, the quality of the bass is where the DaVinci excels. It offers more texture, better separation, and is punchier with more slam and impact. The DaVinci's bass is also more tactile-you can feel it as well as hear it, especially with bass-heavy tracks like hip hop and EDM. So while the amount of bass is the same, the DaVinci delivers a significantly superior bass performance.
I wouldn't classify it as a problem; it's more of a matter of personal preference. I prefer to hear more vocals than bass. Surprisingly, I'm starting to appreciate it more and more as it offers a unique lower mid-range presentation. However, I agree with you that if the mid-bass were reduced by 1-2 dBs, it would be perfect.
I'll be sticking with my Hidizs MP-145. The juice is not worth the squeeze on this one, imho. For me a significant upgrade would have to take the form of another IEM, maybe the FiiO Fa19's or Kinera Odin. Saving up for something special...or investing in a spectacular portable player/DAC...maybe a FiiO M11/Q7.
Hmmm, I don't think so, usually standard 2 pin cables already have that groove. I usually use that groove on the 2 pin to determine the correct orientation/polarity with my cables that doesn't have ear hooks.
Most standard 2-pin cables are designed with a groove to fit that notch, so you shouldn't have any issues. However, I believe switching from a DUNU cable to a third-party cable would be a big mistake. 🙂
I've curated a playlist with over 100 tracks from many genres (classical, rap, hip hop, EDM, pop, rock, metal, K-Pop, and J-Pop) specifically designed to test various aspects of audio performance. When I find the time, I plan to add them to Spotify and Tidal and share the playlist here.
We got it … is bad , now we know …. We all know that this guy is bad in tuning… lets collab together bro and create the perfect profile Equalizers for each specific iem that beats all 😂😂😂
@@Atechreviews Yes Exactly only for you , It beats the Timeless AE ? Your taste is questionable. All reviewers the opposite but you have the golden ears ! Well done 👏
@@Cujobob Moondrop is QC a gamble, agreed. But if you win it , the Dusk is the second best iem below $1500 after the Pilgrim Noir (which is essentialy a more technical Dusk). I won my gamble , no noise in the cable, and no issue with the set either.
@@apothecy4011 you can't just say its the best under $1500, that's very subjective, and there's so many hundreds of iems out there you can't possibly have tried all the best ones. Hop off the hype train.
Actually if you take into account the cable, and accessories, 300$ is a steal. Sound wise, I was torn between Hype4, Pilgrim, and Dusk, but honestly I don't really trust Moondrop QC, I got one of their products dying just few weeks ago.
Moondrop sent me a fake tracking code on AliExpress and then lied about it being shipped out when I asked them.
The Simgot options are interesting, too, but their QC has not been great in my experience.
Same for me. When dusk was first announced i was going to get it but then read all the issues and complaints.
But now im torn between hype4 or davinci.
Davinci has so much value for just $300 with all the accessories it comes with, but its tuning for the higher frequencies isnt my preference.
But, the hype4 is exactly my tuning preference with a bigger sound stage but it doesnt come with all the same accessories😭
@@LocallsYT Hype 4 is also 100$ more at full price. If only demoing was simpler it would have solved lot of doubts.
I agree, it's an incredible deal. When I listen to it and see the faceplates and accessories, I feel it should cost much more. It competes with higher-priced IEMs in terms of sound quality, cable, and overall build quality. DUNU and Gizaudio really hit a homerun with the DaVinci.
And you can also ask customer service for a free pair of Divinus Velvet Eartips. I placed order today and they were kind enough to give me a pair. Thanks Hifigo
Thank you for this very in depth review. I am currently going back whether I should buy the DaVinci oder the SA6 MKII. Your comparisson really helped, I might go for the DaVince for commuting and work first and just later on get the MKII. Keep up the great reveiws!
DUSK beats all of these. If you can afford the SA6 MK2 though, get the Pilgrim Noir.
@@apothecy4011 I tried the Chu II DSP and have to say, the app as well as the cable itself were really bad IMO. I heard the Dusk only sounds "worth the price" with the DSP so it gets a NO from me. Elysian I heard had some QC issues in the past so I am still uncertain about anything from them
@@Joshua-e7j4h Cable is a gamble. Some are good, and some aren't. App is shit. Dusk + DSP without any QC problem = a tad better than the Prestige LTD (due to bass) and less technical than the Pilgrim Noir with everything else equal to it.
Thank you for your kind words! I'm glad my review helped you with your decision. I agree, SA6 MKII can always be a future addition and an upgrade. Enjoy your new IEMs 🙂
Glad to see you in GizAudio
Hi there, I really appreciate your support. Thank you! 😊
SA6 MkII is my fav set from DUNU so far. DaVinci incoming.
The SA6 MK II is one of my all-time favorites. They never leave my side, even when I'm listening to more expensive IEMs. DaVinci is a great addition.
What do you prefer between the two? Why do you like one more than the other?
@@sleepyrhythms6668I find the tuning and technicalities of the SA6 MkII is superb and suits my music taste and requirements so well.
@@sleepyrhythms6668I like the DaVinci for music that emphasizes bass or has a heavy low-end presence, such as movies, soundtracks, hip-hop, and electronic music. The bass, though more than I typically prefer, is incredibly enjoyable and enhances the overall music experience. 100% of the time, I prefer the SA6 MK II. The bass on the SA6 MK II is superbly balanced, and its level of detail and smoothness is extraordinary. The clarity and accuracy are beyond words. It fits almost like a custom-molded IEM, offers excellent isolation, and is easy to drive. It just sounds right and so clear. The DaVinci is there for those moments where I crave boosted bass.
@@Atechreviews I agree about the SA6 MKII. It scales incredibly well and is the reason I sold my Monarch MKII after receiving them. Currently running off a DX320 with Korg NuTubes. Do you recommend getting the DaVinci when I already own these? Are they colored enough to make bad recordings sound good?
for checking depth layering (and bass impact) i recommend James Horner - Hector's Death (Troy - Music From The Motion Picture). great reviews! Dusk comparison with analog cable?
Thanks a lot for the recommendation. I'll check it out and use it in the future. The Dusk has better treble, they share a similar mid-range, but the DaVinci really shines with its richer and more abundant bass. In terms of detail, the Dusk might slightly edge ahead, especially in the treble region.
Hoping to find a good all-rounder in this DaVinci. I only want to buy one IEM and leaning towards this one. Thanks for the review
Oh unfortunately that's never going to happen cuz once you buy one you're going to want another and then another and then another
You're welcome! If you're comfortable with the bass, which is excellent but not excessive, I'd recommend going for it. It's the best IEM I can suggest under $300 and is well-suited for many genres. It's also one of the most enjoyable IEMs I've experienced. I'm keeping mine; they're that impressive. A true all-rounder.
The DaVinci will play all genres well, no doubt, but if it happens that your playlist leans a bit more into Pop, Hip-Hop, and Electronic music, then the DaVinci will likely make you even more happy for a long time.
Great Review!
I usually listen to female vocals like Ariana Grande, Twice, Halsey, or just Disney songs(yeah I know, childish~) and such. Do you think these iems are a good fit for those. If not, can you recommend something in the 200-300$ price range, because I just wanna buy one iem and be satisfied with it. Thanks, much appreciated.
To your description I can't think of a better candidate than the Pula PA02 (the same model you can also get under the name Myer Audio Sliivo D41). Costs 150-180$ depending where you buy it. Well spent money and female vocals shine with it... as well as many other aspects like bass, treble, separation, soundstage... Really one of the best IEMs you can buy under 200.
Hello there, nothing is childish about enjoying Disney songs or any other music. We all have our tastes. If you mainly listen to female vocals like Ariana Grande, Twice, and Halsey, the bass-heavy DUNU DaVinci might not be the best fit. The strong bass emphasis could overshadow the clarity and detail in the mid-range, which is essential for enjoying vocals. While the DaVinci does offer clear and natural-sounding vocals, the bass might be a bit too much for your preference (though I personally love it).
For a more balanced sound that highlights vocals while still providing good bass, I recommend considering the Binary Chopin. It has a vocal-forward sound signature with great clarity and detail retrieval and excellent treble extension, enhancing the enjoyment of female vocals. The PULA PA02 is another great option, though it offers slightly less detail. The Truthear Nova is a third option, with less bass and slightly thin-sounding vocals and instruments, but it can still perform well with some EQ adjustments.
Of all these, I would personally choose the Binary Chopin for what you described. It falls within the $200-300 price range and offers excellent mid-range performance, ensuring that vocals sound clear and engaging without being overwhelmed by bass and has a lot of clarity and air.
Hope this helps!
@@AtechreviewsThanks, I'll look into Chopin as you suggested😊. Thanks for helping me out😁
@@ANSHGOEL-rk6my You're welcome!🙂
Another interesting candidate for comparison would have been mega5est since davinci and mega5est share a very similar fr except the air region.
Great point! Let me start by saying that the HiSenior Mega5est is a great IEM, but it leans a bit too dark for my taste. The difference between the HiSenior Mega5est and the DUNU DaVinci is like night and day.
1. The HiSenior Mega5est tends to sound a bit dark, while the DUNU DaVinci offers better detailed treble and instrument separation. This could be due to the 5-way crossover or the use of multiple acoustic tubes.
2. The DUNU DaVinci is also more resolving, providing greater detail retrieval than the Mega5est. This difference is quite noticeable to my ears.
3. The bass quality is where the DaVinci truly shines. Its bass is rich in texture, detail, separation, rumble, and tactility. I can feel it as well as hear it and it is so satisfying.
4. The vocals on the DaVinci are so rich and natural. The DaVinci has a natural timbre to it that makes vocals and instruments sound natural.
5. The DUNU DaVinci looks better (subjectively to me), has better accessories and comes with a high quality interchangeable termination cable.
After comparing both, I personally prefer the DaVinci and would choose it even if both IEMs were priced the same.
I just got the pilgrim and my only complaint is it needs a little more bass. Detail, resolution, vocals are awesome!
so its the aful p8 in a metal shell?
@@Hijynx87 better. More sub and mid bass than p8. It’s really good. The more I listen, the more I like it. Problem is I’m comparing it to 1k plus iems. It holds its own in some aspects though
I completely agree with you-adding more mid-bass would make it perfect. It already has a fantastic sub-bass rumble, clear vocals, and excellent resolution. It truly holds its own against IEMs priced over $1k.
@@Atechreviews man I was so surprised I prefer it to some of my 1k iems 😅 I love its energetic sound
@@shaunbrady15 Me too. I mean it 100%. It sounds even better to me than IEMs that cost $1600. It is Energetic, airy, detailed, yet never harsh. That is the Elysian house sound for you 🙂
would you recommend these for metal / hard rock... and occasionally classics? thx
Yeah, but only if you like bass. If you want less bass, the AFUL Performer 7 and Explorer are also great for rock and metal.
@@Atechreviews And how do you compare it to xenns tea pro?
@@blackwhit I've never listened to it, so I can't comment on its sound.
@@Atechreviews thank you!
@@blackwhit You're welcome.
How does it compare to hype4/doscinco? Im wondering if its still worth grabbing or is it too similar?
I don't have those IEMs, so I can't comment on their sound quality.
Amazing review, How would you compare it with the Thieaudio Hype 4 and Moondrop Crinacle Dusk ? I can't decide between DaVinci and these 2 both IEMs, please you or someone help me to decide!
Since I don't have the Hype 4, I can't comment on its sound. However, I can say that, for me, the DaVinci is significantly better than the DUSK 2.
@@Atechreviews interesting I think I will buy the DaVinci, I see so many good reviews about it. Thank you very much!
@@raf.nogueira You're welcome! 🙂
@@Atechreviews Can you elaborate why DaVinci is better than Dusk 2
How do you compare DUNU DaVinci and JUZEAR Butterfly 61T?
The difference between the two is like night and day. The DaVinci really shines with its bass-it’s more detailed, textured, and has a much stronger impact. Vocals are clearer, more forward, and the instruments feel better separated. You also get a lot more detail with the DaVinci overall, making the sound quality much better. That said, the 61T does a great job with isolation and has a deeper, more immersive soundstage up front.
Do you need a dac/amp? If so what is the best value? Prefer portable.
You'll need either a DAC/Amp or a basic dongle. I typically use the AFUL SnowyNight along with the FiiO BTR7 for portable use. However, there are other cheaper options available, such as the Moondrop Dawn Pro and Roselsa 9039, which allow you to use the 4.4mm and provide more than enough power. Any basic dongle will suffice, and you can always upgrade later if you wish.
Hey is this an upgrade over the chopin
Yes, a big upgrade but the tonality is different.
Hey man, can you answer this question?
Does Davinci offer a sound presentation that is wide and wraps around the head, putting your IN the music, or does it put the music at a distance in front of your face? Hope that makes sense.
The DaVinci offers a sound presentation that is wide and immersive, wrapping around your head. It creates a spacious and engaging soundstage with good depth, making you feel like you're part of the music rather than having it at a distance in front of you. Hope that helps!
@@Atechreviews that's all I needed to hear, helped immensely in my choosing the Davinci. Thank you! 🙏🏻
@@phetmoz You're welcome! 👍🙂
Appreciate this review, am looking at either the Davinci or the Explorer! Which would you say is less warm and more neutral/balanced as I dislike the typical muddy bloat that some bassy iems have.
First of all, neither of them are muddy or bloated. Both are balanced IEMs with a bass boost. The difference is that the DaVinci has more forward vocals and greater treble extension, offering more treble and vocal clarity as well as better resolution and detail retrieval. The DaVinci also has slightly more bass with a stronger slam and rumble. In contrast, the Explorer is less warm and doesn't strike me as a bass-heavy IEM. While it does have pronounced bass, it's balanced with the rest of the frequencies. The DaVinci is also balanced with a bass boost, but the bass stands out and grabs your attention most of the time. (in a good way) Hope this helps!
@@Atechreviews Thanks for the detailed response! In this case, I'll most likely wait for an audition unit for the Davinci. If I find it too warm/bassy, then will get the Explorer! Appreciate your replies!
@@calvinlooi4500 👍
@@calvinlooi4500 not sure which one you chose. I had the same dilemma. I went with the explorers and they are damn amazing. Put my lovely Katos away sadly.
I did not want to pull the trigger onto a 300euro iem blindly so I went with a similar cheaper iem, but I know I will go to DaVinci down the road. 11.11 is nearby 😁
I returned the Juzear 61t and got the Davinci. I like it better than the Juzear. When I use the S&S tip L size, I feel I'm getting a comfortable seal but I find the noise isolation is rather poor, I can still hear ambient noise. What tips are you using now? And the nozzle is hella big, took me a while to put the S&S on, such a workout lol.
Thanks for sharing!
We all have our preferences, and I'm glad you've found yours and enjoy it. 🙂 I agree about the nozzle size; it's on the larger side, but once you put on the ear tips, they stay in place, which works for me. I use the largest size of the DUNU S&S tips. They're one of my favorites, providing comfort and an excellent seal. Regarding noise isolation, I'd say it's pretty good and comparable to most other IEMs. I can't hear most ambient noises, or they're significantly muffled. The 61T offers above-average passive noise isolation, so if you're comparing, the DaVinci might seem less isolating.
@@Atechreviews thanks for the response! I’ve settled with dunu s&s xl as well.
@@k.w5804 You're welcome!
each dd does it's own bass frequency, thats probably how its separated. rather than an isoberic.
You're probably right and I have reached the same conclusion. I find the implementation to be vastly superior to the isobaric double dynamic driver. The DaVinci's bass offers incredible texture and separation.
How does it compare with the Quintet?
The DaVinci offers more bass with superior quality, delivering better slam, punch, and impact. Its lower mid-range sounds natural and slightly warmer. In contrast, the Quintet has a more pronounced 4-10kHz region, making it more fatiguing over time. The Quintet also exhibits some BA timbre, which doesn't sound as natural to me, while the DaVinci sounds incredibly natural and realistic. Additionally, the DaVinci provides a wider soundstage with good depth and significantly better detail retrieval than the Quintet.
Great review !
Thanks!
How’s the comfort on these sizes in general? (I know we have different ears it’s subjective)
good review!, i am tempting to buy it but few months later, davinci is not limited run right? not like sa6 ultra right
Not that I know of.
I need help i dont know what to choose Tanchjim origin or this Dunu DaVinci / please i need hi resolution for hi res music ❤
Does the frecuency response affects too much???? Why this IEms are superior to standard 20hz-20khz
If you're seeking clarity and detail and aren't concerned about bass, the Tanchjim Origin is the ideal choice. However, if you prefer more low end, then the DaVinci would be the better option.
What do you mean by standard 20 Hz-20 kHz?
@@Atechreviews the 90% of IEMs has that frecuency response
Stay away from this shit Davinci its base will make you headache worst iem
for those who want great bass that punch you in the chest, is the $300 davinci worth it over the $120 explorer ?
Worth every penny.
How is the DaVinci vs the Studio 4?
I just listened to the Studio 4 for the first time yesterday. I plan to continue listening for a few days to form a more accurate impression before comparing it. For now, DaVinci has way more bass.
@@Atechreviews looking forward to your review!
Is anyone else having a hard time fitting these in their ear canal? The port itself is HUGE and i've tried all of the tips... it hurts to try to press it in and I just feel metal and the thing is not sitting flush in my ear at all.
Hopefully, someone can chime in with some helpful info.
Thank you for this comparison, cause you're responding the question i was wondering. I have the Sa6 ultra that i love, and want to find an iem with more bass for watching movies and for some genres of music. I was esitating betwin fatfreq maestro mini and the da vinci, i think the Da Vinci will be a good choice.
You're welcome! I haven't had the chance to listen to the FatFreq Maestro Mini, so I can't comment on its sound. Like you, I use IEMs for watching movies, and this is where the DaVinci truly excels with its strong bass performance and clarity. While the SA6 Ultra offers more detail, the DUNU DaVinci brings more enjoyment and satisfaction for movies and specific music genres. It has no harshness or sibilance, is comfortable, detailed, and can be used for hours. I really think it's hard to beat at this price.
@@Atechreviews thank you for the answer 👍!!
@@retouthugues4921 You're welcome! 🙂
Can u pls explain me how u perceive between Davinci & Mega5est?
In my opinion, the DaVinci excels in both sub-bass and mid-bass, delivering superior quality and quantity compared to the Mega5est. The difference is significant. Vocal clarity is also better on the DaVinci, as the Mega5est's bass tends to overshadow the mid-range, affecting vocal clarity. Although the DaVinci has more bass, it never overshadows the mids for me. Even the sub-bass and mid-bass are well-separated, possibly due to the 5-way crossover.
Additionally, the mid-range on the Mega5est sounds too laid back for my preference, whereas the DaVinci offers a balanced mid-range-neither too forward nor recessed. While I prefer more vocal forwardness, the DaVinci provides good clarity and separation, ensuring the vocals don't feel lacking.
The treble on the Mega5est sounded too smooth and a bit dark to me, and attempts to EQ it made it sibilant. The DaVinci's treble is okay, though slightly too close to my ears. The DaVinci also sounds much more resolving than the Mega5est, which has below-average technicalities for its price. Overall, the Mega5est is smooth and bassy, with laid-back mid-range and vocals, but lacks detail and a modular cable. DaVinci has much more bass (could be too much for some people), better bass, more vocal clarity, better treble clarity, detail retrieval and instrument separation. The difference is not small. If you own the Mega5est, don't worry-it's a good IEM, but the tuning and technicalities just aren't for me.
@@Atechreviews Thanks for the explanation , i will take Davinci instead , i trust u bro❤️
Is the details that good asking cause i want to know if this is good for gaming and music basically and all rounder been hearing hype 4 and em10 are for gaming and music just wondering how these play in to the mix
Exceeding expectations, the technicalities are impressive for the price point. The imaging and spatial cues are excellent, with a detailed low end that makes it easier to hear footsteps and other subtle sounds. The treble is smooth, not harsh, and the overall comfort makes this, in my opinion, a perfect set for gaming.
@@Atechreviews Thank you for answering my question mr atechreviews will definitely support u now and in the future God bless you!
@@joshuaserrano885 Thanks! I appreciate it 🙂
Compare davinci vs variations for edm?
More bass on the DaVinci.
How does it compare to Chopin for KPop/JPop?
The Chopin offers less bass and more forward vocals, with slightly less detail retrieval. I feel the DaVinci is safer for Kpop/Jpop and the bass adds a lot to the enjoyment.
Can you please compare the SA6 MK2 to the Glacier? Thank you.
Honestly, while the SA6 MK II is a fantastic IEM that I'll never part with, the Glacier is on a different level entirely. In terms of tonality, the Glacier has a stronger and cleaner bass, a more forward mid-range for vocal clarity, and airy EST treble. The Glacier sounds incredibly realistic and detailed, it has an endgame level of detail retrieval. The SA6 MK II has impressive detail, likely surpassing most IEMs under $1000, but it doesn't quite match the Glacier. It offers better isolation, and although the bass is excellent, it doesn't reach the quality of the Glacier's dynamic driver bass. Additionally, the SA6 MK II's mid-range is more relaxed and not as forward, though still detailed. The SA6 MK II has a better fit. Both IEMs are outstanding.
how it is vs thieaudio Oracle mk1?
I haven't listened to the Oracle MK I.
Your face plate is actually pretty good, lucky!
Thanks! I was pleasantly surprised with how it looks. 🙂
really torn between hype 4's and these. i can get the hype 4's for possibly the same price and I have good spare cables so dont care about accesories. any advice?
I don't have the Hype 4, so I can't comment on its sound quality. Personally, I prefer buying new IEMs, and I believe paying more should be worth it. Perhaps someone who has experience with both can share their insights.
how would this compare to the project M....
I didn't listen to the Project M, so I can't comment on its sound.
Thanks for another informative review.
Please use foam cover for your mics, picking up too much plosives.
Thanks for the tip! 🙂 I recently got a new mic and use both a foam cover and windscreen. The issue was that I was too close to the microphone. When I stepped back, my voice sounded too distant. I'll work on finding a better balance to make it more comfortable to listen to in the future. Thanks again for your input. 🙂
@@Atechreviews Try DaVinci Resolve 17 to mix your sounds, might help you with the peaking sounds.
@@deparoo Thanks a lot for the tip. I will definitely check it out. 👍
Can anyone compare Davinci with Doscinco and Hype 4? I think such comparisons will be most relevant for those who are looking for good hybrids with powerful bass. In this video, for some reason, the reviewer compares thick with green, and liquid with warm.
Doscinco has a thicker bass but it isn't as technical, refined or smooth in the treble. I think both DaVinci & Hype 4 are a step up from it, more drivers too.
@@phetmozThank you. And what about the virtual scene?
@@phetmoz 1. Thicker as in more bass or sounds more full? (Hard to know what everyone thinks when using similar words haha)
2. If you had to pick one between the 3 you mentioned for Electronic, EDM, Rock and R&B... which way would you go and why?
May I ask, what is thick, green, and liquid?
@@AtechreviewsYou are comparing headphones that sound too different in nature. There are no alternative hybrids with powerful bass dual DD in the review.
How does it compare to Hype 4 and Pilgrim?
I don't have the Hype 4 so I can't comment on its sounds quality. The Elysian Pilgrim IEM has better sub-bass rumble and more resolution and detail but less mid-bass compared to the DaVinci. The Pilgrim is more balanced and smoother with excellent clarity, making it suitable for long listening sessions. While the Pilgrim excels in sub-bass, the DaVinci offers a thicker, richer sound that is enjoyable across various genres. The Elysian Pilgrim is an upgrade in sound quality to my ears. The DaVinci has a higher quantity of bass, while the Pilgrim has a higher quality bass and more air up top. The Pilgrim has much higher resolution and detail retrieval compared to the DaVinci but its mid-bass is more neutral.
@@Atechreviews which one would you personally choose between Pilgrim and Davinci?
@@yoditonugrahacky765 I have and enjoy both as they have different sound signatures, so here's a simple breakdown for you: The Pilgrim has a neutral mid-bass. If you prefer slightly more bass than neutral, the DaVinci is a better choice as it offers more bass. DaVinci is great for bass heavy genres and movies. The bass is the star of the show with the DaVinci. However, if you prioritize detail retrieval and overall resolution in a more balanced sound signature, then the Pilgrim is the way to go.
What’s. Your 10/10?
Elysian Annihilator 2023 is 10/10. DUNU Glacier is a 9.5/10 for me.
Is it bassier than the aful explorer?
The DaVinci does not have more bass than the Explorer; the quantity is exactly the same. However, the quality of the bass is where the DaVinci excels. It offers more texture, better separation, and is punchier with more slam and impact. The DaVinci's bass is also more tactile-you can feel it as well as hear it, especially with bass-heavy tracks like hip hop and EDM. So while the amount of bass is the same, the DaVinci delivers a significantly superior bass performance.
I’m waiting for mines to arrive
Happy listening!
good review
Thanks!
vs cincotres and hype 4 ?
I don't have either of those, so I can't comment on their sound quality. Maybe someone else in the comments can provide some insights.
You try the aune ar5000. You will be wow
Thank you for the suggestion, If I have the chance, I will try it.
Hydro has the same problem The bass ( very punchy ) especially mid bass should have been 1-2 dB lower but the technicalities are very good
I wouldn't classify it as a problem; it's more of a matter of personal preference. I prefer to hear more vocals than bass. Surprisingly, I'm starting to appreciate it more and more as it offers a unique lower mid-range presentation. However, I agree with you that if the mid-bass were reduced by 1-2 dBs, it would be perfect.
I'll be sticking with my Hidizs MP-145. The juice is not worth the squeeze on this one, imho. For me a significant upgrade would have to take the form of another IEM, maybe the FiiO Fa19's or Kinera Odin. Saving up for something special...or investing in a spectacular portable player/DAC...maybe a FiiO M11/Q7.
They do offer different sound signatures, but I see where you're coming from.
I kinda want one but I already got a pilgrim lol, might do it anyways
Both have different sound signatures, so it makes sense to have both.
Can you please verify how reality has changed?
What do you mean?
wtf a groove in the connection ? This makes third party cables impossible to fit in ?
Hmmm, I don't think so, usually standard 2 pin cables already have that groove. I usually use that groove on the 2 pin to determine the correct orientation/polarity with my cables that doesn't have ear hooks.
Most standard 2-pin cables are designed with a groove to fit that notch, so you shouldn't have any issues. However, I believe switching from a DUNU cable to a third-party cable would be a big mistake. 🙂
what's your music test list
I've curated a playlist with over 100 tracks from many genres (classical, rap, hip hop, EDM, pop, rock, metal, K-Pop, and J-Pop) specifically designed to test various aspects of audio performance. When I find the time, I plan to add them to Spotify and Tidal and share the playlist here.
@@Atechreviews +1
Worst IEM. Its base will hit your ears and you will headache and you will not want to listen it again. trust me pretest before buy this IEM.
OK.
We got it … is bad , now we know …. We all know that this guy is bad in tuning… lets collab together bro and create the perfect profile Equalizers for each specific iem that beats all 😂😂😂
Did you watch my review? I mentioned that it's the best IEM under $300 for my musical preferences and tastes.
@@Atechreviews Yes Exactly only for you , It beats the Timeless AE ? Your taste is questionable. All reviewers the opposite but you have the golden ears ! Well done 👏
@@Rex88282 I don't have the Timeless AE, I have the original Timeless.
Do Dusk. Best iem under $700. Better than the IE600, Pilgrim , Hype4 , Mega5est, and simgot EM10.
He compared it already and said it wasn’t anything special. Not the best under $400, definitely not $700
Poor QC, shady company, and the DSP cable is noisy. None of these properly vent the chamber to protect your ears.
@@shaunbrady15 subjective. For me , it is the best one. Have tried all the iems I mentioned as well.
@@Cujobob Moondrop is QC a gamble, agreed. But if you win it , the Dusk is the second best iem below $1500 after the Pilgrim Noir (which is essentialy a more technical Dusk). I won my gamble , no noise in the cable, and no issue with the set either.
@@apothecy4011 you can't just say its the best under $1500, that's very subjective, and there's so many hundreds of iems out there you can't possibly have tried all the best ones. Hop off the hype train.
Hey does it do female vocals well?