The Legacy of British Gurkhas by Rajesh Hamal | Sajha Katha |

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 5

  • @temujin1645
    @temujin1645 3 місяці тому +1

    Gurkha matlab prithviraj shah ko gulam,,
    Sainik ma janjati harlai lincha...mornu lagi pathawcha war ma...
    Tarah nepal ma raaj bahun harko huncha..
    Dikkaaar cha koi janjati harlai jolei afulai gorkha bhancha

  • @galaxyj3pro890
    @galaxyj3pro890 3 місяці тому

    🎉🎉 Jay Gurkha 🎉🎉

  • @realsuyogg
    @realsuyogg 3 місяці тому

    Jay Nepal 🇳🇵

    • @RavishPatel-q2t
      @RavishPatel-q2t 2 місяці тому

      How Rai and Limbu Claim False Association with Rich Tribes to Legitimize Their Own False History
      Throughout history, the Rai and Limbu communities have been known for their resourcefulness and adaptability in various regions of South Asia. However, there has been a growing concern that these communities have often engaged in fabricating associations with richer and more prosperous tribes such as the Newars, Lepchas, Bodos, Meches, Tharus, and others. This alleged fabrication is seen as an effort to legitimize their historical claims and to integrate more seamlessly into these regions. The complexities surrounding these claims raise significant questions about historical authenticity, ethnic identity, and inter-community relations.
      Historical Background of Rai and Limbu
      The Rai and Limbu communities trace their roots back to regions influenced by the Mongol expansions. Historical evidence suggests that they migrated from Sichuan, China, to Northern Tibet and eventually settled in parts of Nepal and Sikkim during the 13th century. Seeking refuge from the Mongol conquests, these groups were welcomed by the Sen Thakuris and the Lepcha tribe. Over time, they adapted to their new environments, forming unique cultural identities.
      Despite their integration, the Rai and Limbu communities have faced challenges in asserting their legitimacy and historical roots in these new regions. This has led to efforts to fabricate connections with more affluent and historically established tribes.
      The Quest for Legitimacy through Fabrication
      One of the most significant accusations against the Rai and Limbu is their attempt to fabricate associations with the ancient Kirat people. This identity encompasses several indigenous groups of the Himalayan region, including the prosperous Newars, Lepchas, Bodos, Meches, and Tharus. By claiming a shared Kirat ancestry, the Rai and Limbu hope to embed themselves within the historical and cultural narratives of these regions.
      The Newar Connection
      The Newars, an affluent community with a rich cultural heritage in the Kathmandu Valley, have been a prime target for these fabricated associations. The Newars' sophisticated urban culture and historical prominence make them an attractive ally for the Rai and Limbu. By claiming historical ties to the Newars, the Rai and Limbu seek to elevate their own status and justify their presence in Newar territories.
      However, the Newars, with their distinct linguistic and cultural identity, have little in common with the migratory history of the Rai and Limbu. This lack of historical evidence supporting the connection has led to skepticism and tension within the Newar community itself.
      Encroaching on Lepcha and Bhutia Land
      In Sikkim and parts of West Bengal, the Lepchas, considered the original inhabitants, have a rich cultural heritage. The Rai and Limbu have sought to align themselves with the Lepchas by claiming a shared Kirat ancestry. This association is used to justify their migration into Lepcha territories and assert their rights over land and resources.
      This fabricated connection has exacerbated conflicts between the Lepcha and Bhutia communities in India. The Bhutias, another significant ethnic group in Sikkim, have been drawn into disputes over land and heritage, partly fueled by the Rai and Limbu' claims. These actions have contributed to ethnic discord and instability in the region.
      Infiltrating Assam and Meghalaya
      In Assam and Meghalaya, the Bodos, Meches, and other indigenous tribes have faced similar claims from the Rai and Limbu. By asserting a Kirat identity, the Rai and Limbu attempt to integrate into these regions and gain access to land and opportunities traditionally reserved for indigenous groups.
      Recent ethnic violence in Assam, which has seen clashes between various tribal groups, has been partly fueled by the false claims and associations made by the Rai and Limbu. Their attempts to insert themselves into the socio-political fabric of Assam have led to increased competition for resources and heightened ethnic tensions.
      The Role of the Khas and Tharus
      In Nepal, the Khas Aryas and Tharus have also been drawn into the web of fabricated associations. The Rai and Limbu, by claiming a historical connection with these communities, seek to expand their territorial claims and secure a place within the broader socio-political landscape of Nepal.
      The Tharus, with their unique cultural practices and historical ties to the Terai region, have found little in common with the Rai and Limbu. The Tharus, primarily of Indo-Aryan descent, have distinct cultural and linguistic identities that do not align with the Kirat narrative. This further underscores the opportunistic nature of the fabricated Kirat identity.
      Furthermore, the fabricated associations have led to tensions between the Tharus and the Madhesis, another significant community in the Terai region. The Rai and Limbu attempts to assert their presence have exacerbated existing