Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
DON'T BUY the 9900K for GAMING !! -- Intel Core i5-9600K
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 січ 2019
- Amazon US Link (Affiliate): amzn.to/2UwuYkO
Amazon UK Link (Affiliate): amzn.to/2LcD3a3
I found out, the i9-9900K is NOT worth it for gaming. The i5-9600K is what you should go for instead!
20% Discount Code for Software Keys and Gaming Mouse: NCE18
Windows 10 Pro OEM Key: bit.ly/2yURr0M
Office 2016 Pro Key: bit.ly/2DeqIB1
15% Discount Code for Figure Toys and PS4 Skins: Actionfiguresale
Site: actionfiguresa...
Manufacturer: Intel
Model: BX80684I59600K / CM8068403874404
Full Specifications:
ark.intel.com/...
In my opinion, the more expensive i9-9900K simply isn't worth it for gaming.
You're better off going with the i5-9600K instead. Or am I wrong? :o
Pretty sure it will be pegged at 100% bottlenecking in Assassin's creed Odyssey / Origins
my 8600k at 4.8ghz is even bottlenecking sometimes in BFV already... better go 9700k or 8700k instead.
yeah 9700K is the way to go
@@ppsarrakis Immagine how consoles are suffering then...
If youre the type of person that likes to upgrade every other year or if youre just playing esports then buying the 9600k makes sense. Otherwise the 9900k will provide much more longevity with its 8 cores 16 threads.
I5-9600k stock I'm not OC , RTX 2070 Asus Strix OC ( stock I'm not doing oc ) and 16 gb ram's . In Battlefield V all settings on ultra and resolution on monitor 2k with 165hz G-sync I got 90-120 fps AVG : 100/105 every time . And on cpu I got 56 C full load Air cooling Noctua ND-HD 14 and GPU has 66 C after 2.5h in gaming at 2k. That's perfect for me , I don't need plane's or I9 / 3000ryzen or wtf is that . I'm just chilling and gaming . Good luck bro .
Did you experience any stutters in games? Many people talk about stuttering ... i am thinking of buying 9600k in near future and am a bit sceptic atm
@@Psiho007 nope , you can easy oc it to 5.0 GHz easy and is stable .
imagine using a 165hz monitor to play games at 90fps
@@reniervandermerwe After 5 years :)) Wake up buddy ! And yes 165hz and now 360hz with I9-14900K and 3090ti
How many people are actually going to use multithreaded applications though? I'd rather have a 9600k
yesterday i bought i5 9600k, i did chose for intel is mutch more stable
And what's your experience with it ? Is it a good CPU for montages and games ?
Hateroz sure! i have very good peformance
@@ZR-eb9xy I just wanna know if a jump between an i5-7600K to an i5-9600K will be a good idea :P
Hateroz i think the i5 7600k is good enough, for gaming and montages
@@ZR-eb9xy I bought the 9600K and I'll see if I needed it :D
Don't listen to the UA-camrs criticizing i5 9600k.
I personally own an i5 9600k 9th gen at 4.6 ghz with a GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and a 32 gb ram stick (Corsair Vengeance)
I can probably play all the latest games for future 8 years. It is a very powerful setup.
My i7 3770 is 7 years old and still kicking ass somehow. I guess I will a bit longer for an upgrade.
🙂 i have a Core2Quad thats putting along still ☺️🐢
I have just upgraded to i5-9600k because at stock it beats my 4.7GHz OC i7-3770k. With a 5GHz OC the i5 9 gen should whip its ass.
Maratha Yes but i still have Windows 95 motherboards that work so it should be good, just replace the CMOS battery
Maratha Yeah if the clock stops working after a decade or so. Obviously not going to fix a motherboard.
My 3570k in my old computer still runs any game, just not on max. My new computer i5 9600k runs everything on Max.
Was the results for the i7-9700K intentionally hidden?
*Waiting for RYZEN 3000* 😎
me too.
Looking forward to see what those CPUs bring to the table!
It's quite a long wait.
@@vktechtv4244 I would say computex so just over 5 months, which honestly if you are sitting on like a 4790k or better is not that much of a wait. 4790k is a perfectly fine CPU. And if you are sitting on a 3570k or older really and honestly if you have waited this long I would say if you have waited this long it's almost certainly worth the wait of 5 extra months as if you bought it near launch you have been sitting on it for over 8 years.
And if you are on something even worse like a Q6600 then buying something like a 2600 with a B450 motherboard then dropping in a Zen 2 CPU and selling the 2600 isn't a bad option and a 2600 would still be a big upgrade. That would also be my suggestion to anyone who is buying into PC and is building the system themselves.
The only real reason I can think to upgrade to Intel currently is if you are buying pre-built and don't want to replace the CPU.
@@Etheoma Computex launch is probably some way ahead of the Zen2 chips hitting the shelves though, and at anything close to RRP if demand is high, and it likely will be.
I'm actually on a AMD 9370 and tbh, it still does a really good job. There isnt much I can't play at good fps, though I have 2x 980Ti's in SLI. I think I bought this chip about 5 maybe 6 years ago, close to when it released. But demand for those wasnt high :-)
I can wait, I'm just itching to build a high end base rig, that I'll add updated GPUs to by the end of the year.
yes a 370 will run a 9th gen just fine, i had my i9-9900k working just fine and over clocked to 5ghz on all cores
You are indeed incorrect. I came to the exact same conclusion you did, so I purchased the 9600k and then the 9900k, which increased the frame rate and constancy of highs and lows. The consistency is the main point here that gets lost in bar graphs. If you are gaming on 1080p, on a high refresh rate monitor, you will see a very noticeable bump in the smoothness using the 9900k with a decently powerful GPU. The 9600k can not keep up in the 144fps and up range, and bottlenecks the system as it can not handle the massive amount of info coming from the GPU at high fps. At 1440p this would be less of a concern, but almost 70% of users are on 1080p so I felt this was a slightly misleading and click bait title.
True, but it doesn't really make sense to buy a 9900k if you're planning on only gaming at 1080p. 9600k will be just fine unless you're one of the few trying to push 240hz on something like the Asus pg258q. And that is definitely not 70% of users on 1080p.
@@greengumbyy certainly the stats show most of the users at 1080p are at 60hz. Although I think that is changing. I would guess that 144hz is going to become the new normal over the next year. Having used both processors I think it makes more sense to spring for the 9900k at 1080p, than spend that money on a higher end graphics card that your resolution can't take advantage of. A 1070 ti or a 2060 paired with a 9900k is a rock solid build for 1080p gaming. It also gives you half of what you need if later down the line you aquire a high refresh rate 1440p monitor. As CPU bound as 1080p is in modern titles, I would argue is is more vital than the graphics card.
@@thew1neguy It's funny the way it works that at lower resolutions, the cpu is the bottleneck and not the gpu. But even so, I'm not sure how much of a difference it would make. Games like CS:GO I don't think it matters much at all. Both these processors with a 1070 or 2060 and above will likely give close to 300 fps. AAA titles maybe a bit more noticeable. Still, both processors when overclocked at 5ghz or higher, return roughly the same fps.
@@greengumbyy absolutely. CS:GO it's the difference of 280 and 300 fps. Who cares at that point. I was actually shocked with AAA games how much of a difference I saw upgrading to the 9900k. It was shocking and unexpected from what you see online. Most UA-camrs seem to focus on average frames per second and 1% low's. What you actually find in 1080p gaming is the need for a strong processor to handle the super high frames per second that are heading its way from the graphics card. The consistency of experience makes a world of difference that a graph of average frames per second never really shows. That is why I think the CPU is the deciding factor at lower resolutions.
But looking at your benchmarks the 9900K outperforms the 9600K in pretty much every test, if you're not going for a budget build you might aswell go for the i9 over the i5.
Exactly! Why would i want to go to a slower 9600k i5 cpu if i can go with a faster 9900k i9 cpu. Just makes no sense.
Unless you are gaming at 4K with ultra settings, video editing or running CAD those benchmarks don't justify spending nearly 2.5x more for the 9900k just to game. I think he's even running all these CPUs at stock speeds. Which if you water cooled the 9600k and over clocked it you could close the gap on performance with some of these benchmarks. But to each their own. All builds are for a purpose and i think he just trying to point out if you want to upgrade to something new you can't go wrong with the 9600k right now.
@@181667 i agree, the latest 9th gen i5 9600k is a perfect cpu for regular gaming at 1080p even will work good with 1440p. Just depends on your gpu st that point you wont be getting the fps you would be getting on the i9 but thats ok. Because it will be smooth gameplay nevertheless. No one said its the only cpu you can get and every single other cpu sucks. Thats silly. The i9 9900k is just the best, fastest, top tier cpu you can get right now for gaming. Really made just for enthusiasts and buisness work. The 9th gen i5 is perfectly fine for gaming but you will get significant more performance out of the i9. Thats all that anyones trying to say. It would be foolish to get the new i9 9900k if you were only going to game at 1080p. That would be a complete waste of money at that point. But if your going to be gaming at 1440p or 2160p then get it, but if u dont have the latest gpu its kind of a waste then too. So whoever has an i5 9th gen dont worry your no better or worse than someone who has an i9 and that piece of hardware is perfectly adequate.
@@181667
You need to work on your math buddy.
How is the 9900k 2.5x the price of a 9600k?
Are you just exaggerating to make your point sound more valid?
Depends on what you're going to do. Regular gaming at 1080 p, i59600k pretty much wins.
Ima do loads of gaming and occasionally edit and upload a vid for the channel is the i5 worth?
3:18 interesting, you get more fps in 1440p with some cpus
Filetsteak u didn’t know😂
This is the reason why i got the 8600k @5ghz, together with RTX 2080, i'm getting 100++ fps even on aw3418dw. Great video!
9700K is the ticket for high refresh gamers. I’ve seen plenty of reason to run it over 8600K/9600K. 8600K/9600K is still legit though and would be a second pick for me. I’ve tested 8600K, 8700K, 9700K and 2700x extensively and for a combination gaming and productivity system 9700K is it. Even with great memory the 2700x doesn’t impress me at all for 144hz gaming. Great value where high thread counts are needed though.
Can we have the same comparison between thei5 9600K and the i7 9700K?
8700k seems like a better choice
🙂 yes, its in the middle
No, the 9600k is slighty faster for gaming
@@theendurance Until you hit 100% load and it get f*cked
@@theendurance only at stock clocks.
@@theendurance 9600k is the same as 8600k so 8700k should beat them both
Proud owner of a 8700k and will be for at least another 2 years.
Have an 8600k OCd to 5.0 on all 6 cores and I freaking love it. Temps max at mid 70s in Prime95. Can hit 5.1 stable but 5.2 starts to crash and have to really crank voltage. Liquid cooled btw. Benches like a beast too.
What cooler do you use? And what chipset is your Mobo? Im thinking of getting one and don't know if it's worth it.
@@FSG_YT gigabyte z370 gaming 7 an x62 kraken but I'm switching to a custom loop in a few days actually. GPU is a Vega 56 (flashed to 64 bios).
HEY I AM CONFUSED SHOULD I BUY I5 9600K OR AMD RYZEN 7 2700X FOR GAMING
i5 9600k (strictly for gaming)
2700x for Gaming(-10+ Fps compared to I5 9600k),Rendering,Editing,Multitasking and Streaming.
but,
don't go for 2700x cause they're releasing ryzen 3000 series and the announcement is on May 27.
so better wait if you want a Ryzen Cpu.
Depends on your graphic card
a little late, but Im planning to game on a 3060ti, competitive in game settings @1080p 165hz currently. and may look to stream in 720p or 1080p.
I have a 9600k, but should I upgrade to 9900k? I think it may be a better pair?
I use NZXT kraken x72 and the highest temp it has ever hit is 50 and is normally 35 when gaming
🙂 yeah i agree with all u said, get that or its brother the 86K, its $229 at our local Microcenter, i think its better than a slower boring 8400 🐢 plus not having Hyper Threading protects you from some hack attacks, i would get a decent B locked board, 8gb of decent 2666 ram, and reuse one of my old graphics card; so is there any way to get my windows 7 going?✌️😏📀
Guess what? I bought the i9 9900k just for gaming.
must be nice lol
LOL!
same
i5 8600k/9600k can't really deal with bf5..saying not to buy 9900k is rubbish...i run 9900k and 8086k and they are much better in gaming then 9600k ...clear as fuck mate
please help (cor i5 9600k, 9700k, 9900k which one the best for gaming and grafice)
Depends if you want to stream
Is the gpu bottlenecking the 9900k though?
I have a i7 2600, thinking of upgrading to i5 9600k.. Is that much of an upgrade?
Yeah people were saying 3930k, 4930k, 5820k are not for gaming, but today games love those 6 cores and quad core user especially without hyper-threading are needed an upgrade. Ubisoft games run much worse without hyper-threading for example... 9900k is future-proof. Ac origins or bf 5, bf 1 multiplayer will use like 80-90% of 9600k...i5's are useless these days, i7 without a hyper-threading is a joke as well... and intel's terrible solder under 9900k ihs make you just wait for another cpu
Rocking a 6600k in my my sim rig @4.7ghz with a 2080ti. Main rig has a 7700k @5.2ghz with a 2080ti. Wife's pc has a 6700k @4.6ghz with a 1080ti and kids pc has a 6600k @4.5ghz with a 1080. I have a 980 ti and a 1080 ti to get rid of now though.
The i5 9600k is a reliable performer and is reliable when clocked beyond 4.6.
Is 9400f good for gaming??
Should I buy it or should I buy 9600k?
@@mrscientific2169 ... I had to ask a friend of mine who reliably informs me it is an excellent performer for gaming.... I also looked into it and apparently it offers excellent bangs for the buck.
@@bearsadventures666 thanks!
I5 9600k is the worst cpu created since fx series its the same shit as i3 8350k , overpriced for nothing
, Here in my country i can get 2700 ryzen 7 or almost i7 8700k (20€ difference) which is absurd
Which is the best budget motherboard for i 5 9600 k
Do u think 75$ for this is a good deal
Can I gaming and streaming with this CPU?
lmk when you find out
9th gen processors should work just fine on the z370 motherboards so long as you have it up to date with drivers and all that. If you dont, then well maybe thats the problem with those people getting BsoD
could you record well with the 9600K?
Max memory = 128 GB - not 64!!!
I bought this and paired it with an MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON mobo, 32GB of RAM clocked to 2933MHz and OCed the i5-9600k to 5.1GHz on all cores with an air cooler without any issues! This chip is a GREAT overclocker!
But I'm still thinking and. Regretting not getting the i7 version, oh well this CPU kicks ass and I love my system!
What voltage did you use I have same board I keep getting errors when trying to oc it. Won't boot either. Is it just voltage and cores you adjust
@@deanpartridge9545 Don't remember anymore tbh. Using Ryzen now.
But I remeber lettign my motherboard change it dynamicly whilst having a max limit.
I can check if I have the voltage chnages on a pic or something on my NAS, but don't hold your breath.
Also I just got REAL lucky on the sillicone lottery with my chip tbh.
@@hitmandahl OK cheers bud
How well will i5 9600k work with gtx 1080 and 16 gb ram? Will my cpu go 100 % usage in games and will it bottleneck?
that should pair perfectly, shouldnt have any issues with bottlenecking
@@joshuatanner4976 Yea i know now But my motherboard does only support 6 and 7 gen intel cpu Dammit But how will i7 6700k work with gtx 1080? No bottleneck? And i want to be able too stream sometimes to so :)
Im not sure tbh, look it up if I was you I’d just spend the extra $ and get a decent mobo to go with a 9600, and you won’t have to upgrade for years... or just go with an amd setup
Hello! Can i5 9600k run photoshop & illustrator smoothly without gpu?
The 9900k has 8c and 16t. At least under windows it interprets them as 16 threads. But actually SMT roughly increases the workload on one for by about 25%. So 8c+smt ~ 10c10t cpu
This cpu is underrated simply because of its price. Only intel cpu from i5 series which I would buy
Great video, as always. About time somebody realises you dont need a 9900k to just play games. Great for workstations though
I would buy Ryzen 2700
i9-9900k was purchased by me yesterday and arrives Friday. Looking forward for this to destroy my i5-9600k.
8700 non k with cheap b360 mb+2666 ram+30$ cooler >>>>>> 9600k+gigabyte mb+3200ram+expensive cooler.. for the same price.. there are games nowadays that has very low 1% lows with only 6 core processor aka stuttering
my 9600k runs @5.2GHz with max temps in the 60-70°c so.. much headroom .. that cpu is such an OC beast
Air cooling or AIO
@@malovent538 aio duhhh
@@ronaneikelenberg9259 fuck i can't go over 4.9 ghz
@@kolysion164 really? Are u adjusting voltages properly and using a gokd cooler?
@@soulblad3X it's ok I have all formated, I'm at 05ghz easy now
An rtx 2080 nd i5 9600k i only play games not streaming is it best combo for me ?? And it will bottleneck ?
Ps4 Footnote l no bottleneck . Is a high end cpu
You're wrong. First off, stop the bias that you have toward AMD. Why do I still claim that you're biased toward AMD? Because why would you you include them in the damn charts if you're only trying to "show us" 9900k VS 9600k and how 9600k is more "worth" to buy than the 9900k? Show the two damn processors, stop subtly implying that AMD is a better value. BTW, 6/6 cores are already showing to be a slight bottleneck in games such as BF5, Assassin's Creed etc. It's a bottleneck and none should get a 6/6 cores when they can have 6/12 with the 8700k which will be sufficient enough for 10+ years from now.
Z370 works fine, just update your bios
Don't get any of em.Get a Ryzen 2600 and oc to 4.2ghz and save a lot of money to buy a better graphics card
If you want the highest frame-rates then you go with 9900k otherwise go for Ryzen.
Or 8700k, which doesn't cost and arm and a leg with a cooler for 5fps less.
MrGts92 Sure :D
An overclocked i5 even i3 is everything you need for gaming, 90% of the modern games are not optimized for multicore, the only language they know is clock speed. The 8 core i9 is more of a middle rage produce between gaming and production. It is too expensive for a gaming CPU, but comparing to CPUs really made for production load like Skylake-X and Threadripper, it's cheaper and can handle some production load. If you are not a professional, not going to do rendering, video editing, streaming and CAE simulation, i9 is never for you. You will never need more than 4 cores in everyday use, actually if you have a 8 cores CPU, you can turn off 4 cores and don't even notice a difference. If you only do gaming, go buy a i5 9600k or even wait for the i3 9350KF and get yourself a better graphic card. In addition, CPU with less cores will be easier to overclock and get more gaming performance.
Delete your comment LOL.
I ran my 9600k at 5hgz for years
Depends what games you're playing. If you're playing well optimized AAA games then you can get away with a cheap CPU, but if you're playing CPU heavy games like MMORPGS, open world games and early access games, you will regret having a cheap CPU.
Good thing 9600k isn't a cheap CPU.
@@dainiusvysniauskas2049 at half the price of a 9900k, it is cheap and in about 2-3 years you'll want to upgrade again (depending on what games you play). 9900k will keep up for at least 5 years. 9600k is ok if you don't mind buying a new PC in 2 years. If you really want to save money, go Ryzen, but don't expect to play early access and other CPU heavy games with a steady frame rate.
@@australienski6687 It's still relatively expensive.
In 2-3 years time you will be able to pickp up similarly priced CPU that will most likely be as fast as 9900k or even faster than it, so you will end up getting same performance for same cost.
Ryzen CPUs are perfectly fine, as long as you can live without maximum possible FPS.
@@dainiusvysniauskas2049 It's not just maximum frames that are affected, it's minimums and that's what causes stuttering and frame drops. I personally can't stand it, so I always buy the fastest CPU, RAM and GPU I can afford to avoid bottlenecks.
If it doesn't bother you and you don't mind buying a new CPU and motherboard and reinstalling windows again in 2-3 years then get a cheaper CPU. I only upgrade my CPU/Mobo/RAM every 5 years and GPU every 2-3 years as I hate building PCs.
Relative to what? To the 9900k it's half the price, so relative to that it's cheap. Computer hardware is going up in price every year, not down. If you're trying to save money, don't buy 9600k, wait for 7nm Ryzen which is coming out this year.
Costs 180$ in my country!
Ok. Now I am going to buy the i9-9900K just because you said do not buy it! I just love how other gamers say DO NO BUY on their headline! What if you got a gamer who bought it & said I got awesome FPS? Then what? Er? Uh? Ummmm? Hmmmmmmm? Just because another gamer did not get awesome FPS does not mean i9-9900K suxs. Here are the facts! It depends how you build your system. Now I do agree intel is very $$$ that's their fault. I mean if they think AMD is not going to pass them then they are ignorant as hell!
Got i7 9700k for gaming :P
how is it
In Far Cry 4 having a lot of Threads actually makes Performance worse
Guys! Could you recomend a aircooler for cpu i9 9900k? I will use without overclocking... thanks !!!
Be quiet dark rock pro 4 or Noctua D15
@@thursdaythought7201 Thanks!
Do not buy this!
*buys core i5*
But where is 9700 K best for games .... ?
For me it is cause that's what I have
Is cooler master hyper 212 evo enough for i5 9600k
yeah it should be
Isn't it comparable to i5 8600k?
9600k has a slight edge by 1 or 2 frames, that's it. Other than that it's negated by running a degree hotter.
all you AMD plebs here lol. OMFG AMD said they are gonna do something better than Intel. Reality is they just separated their die into 2 sections. Where as Intel isn't taking the easy way out........ I'm gonna laugh when Intel's 10nm tech is faster than AMD 7nm tech lmfao
How does the rtx 2070 do with i5 9600k
Very well, I have this current cpu/gpu combo in my rig
My i7 6950x still does me good oof
Ugh....after watching this video, I'm now even more happy I went with a 9900K. You state that you leave everything stock, umm...you realize people buy the 9900K for the opportunity to hit 5G's without sweating? For 200 bucks more...no big deal when you are talking $1200+ or more for an avg gaming rig. We aren't talking about $1G or more for a proc, it's $500+ and I actually got mine for $489. And who leaves things "stock?" Not many folks. Then you brag about the less power consumption....who in their right mind worries about power consumption first? LULz....this video is hilarious but thats my opinion only.
9600k will hit 5Ghz as well.
Is this too much for RTX 2060?
the best cpu for that is 9600k/ryzen 5 2600x
I have a i5 8400 and I want to upgrade to a better i5
Fx 8350 has best price to performance. New price is under 80$ and used is 20$
Echo1975 maybe so, but the performance ain't up to snuff. You'd be much better off with a generation old R5 1400 or 1500X
lol, have it at, if ultra budget is your thing. I personally have no interest in anything FX. Ryzen is a for more compelling. Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) might even see me to buy AMD again, something I haven't done since the Athlon 64.
Used Sandy Bridge CPUs will cost around the same and perform better than FX.
A $99 2200G is better performer than 8350.
@Salt Maker I played arma 2 mods with this cpu and I hated the fps. After upgrading I got from around 30 fps to 50+
on server
only 6 threads... Most recommended specs require 8 threads! This CPU is already outdated!
@Vyrisus Jesus MLG thinks the quantity is better than the quality :)
thank you for including witcher3 benchmark.
😀 yay its $15 on steam & gog Sale
Will i5 9600k badly bottleneck rtx 2070 super
Thank man...im on tight budget ..is there much difference between i 5 9600 k and i 5 9600 f
Thanks man
8700K is better for gaming.
i mean i7-9700k is perfect option for gaming
I have the 9900k this shit hot af like stupid hot
Next day I go buy pentium 2011 edicion for margonem
Ryzen 5 2600x is still a better choice too! ;)
@phillip martin They tested the 2600, not the 2600X.
@@faycalassaad6066 2600X is still a lot slower.
That's not really true though.
Or the ryzen 7 2700x ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@rdmz135 Depend which ram do you have. 3200mhz on ryzen has very good performance. we dont know what ram frequency he runs in this test
Nice GPU benchmarks . Learn to make the CPU the limiting factor
Ryzen 5 2600 shine :)
Oh dear we going to buy it what ever you say
Well, buy it. I'm not stopping anyone.
I have the same motherboard and chip this video is perfect
LoLz, my i8700 seems ok yet, 6c/12t...
if you have money 9900K OCed is the best gaming cpu on the market and it will last for years !
Old video, but the 9600k will get a 5ghz all core overclock with reasonable temps. A couple mates and I did ours and all got equal results. It's a very good chip for the $$$
thumbs up!
Thumbs up for your comment, too! ;)
Intel at this right moment doesn't make any sense reason why its that they had the monopoly and didn't care about customers so they release new cpus needing a new motherboard by unsupporting socket or chipset, this also reflected at prices since AMD release ZEN the CPU market has to shift towards to AMD side of things according to mind factory they sell 2 AMD CPUs or more vs 1 Intel... AMD is taking the enterprise sector with eypc 64c 128t vs 8180 28c 56t platinium, Intel at this right moment has today has nothing to counter AMD to starting monopoly the current market. AMD ryzen are far away better option to the future since you can buy an AM4 motherboard and do an upgrade in the future without needing to replace the motherboard. That's my case I have a R7 1700x 14nm and I can make upgrade for ryzen 3000 series in 7nm, that half of 14nm btw and get a huge upgrade lift. Not even Intel did this kind of upgrade for years people have been stuck a 14++++++nm for years now. They just sit on their fat ass since they thought that AMD was a threat for them, and the end they had to hire AMD staff to start moving again... And do new cpus.
9600k for life boiz
Oh sorry I’m laptop already has it
I wouldn't buy either of them overpriced cpus, i will stay with my i5 4690k antill zen 2 cpus are out.
☺️ yay i have a haswell too
@phillip martin you are taking out of your ass, a early sample zen 2 cpu was showen beating a 9900k allso useing less power.
the way AMD is going isn't the future. If you want second rate hardware go with AMD that's how it's always been. When Intel finally drops 10nm and it's running faster than AMD 7nm tech it should open your eyes. When Intel gets to 7 hily shit AMD has 0 chance vs the efficiency of Intel's more complex die.
@@CheatersHaveSmollPP Although you a probably correct Intel 10nm will likely prove to have superior performance than AMDs 7nm, I wouldn't call AMD second rate. If not for AMD Intel would still only be offing the main stream market 4c 8t processors and charging a crazy premiums for the higher core counts HEDT segment.
In a 5 months ADM is likely to take the crown. 6 months later Intel may take it back. I think that great for the community makes them keep innovating and keeps prices more competitive. It's good for everyone to have AMD competitive again.
There are option for everyone and every budget. Choice is good, competition is good.
Blind irrational fanboy-ism is just plain silly, on both sides.
same here, still on my i5 4670k oc to 4.4 that i did a build back in early 2014, just waiting for zen 2 so i can do a rebuild.
Ryzen 3700x probably be a good choice.Failing that, just get the 8700k or 2700x
9600k has significantly worse minimums then any other high end chip from Intel (8600k has same issue). Even 7700k has better 0.1% lows despite having worse averages in most reviews. Spend the extra on 8700k.
U should get 9700k for gaming and u can get 9900k for gaming and also streaming also rendering but there is lot more alternatives for that anyway :/
I wanna multi task so I need the i7
If you want to multi task, you're better off investing in more RAM. Any of these base model CPU's are fine for multi tasking. Only thing a 9700k will be better for over a 9600k is rendering video slightly faster.
@@merritt2014 I mean streaming while multitasking
R5 value king (or R7)
Don't buy an i5 for gaming
Nevermind that the 2600X is outperformed by the 8600K and 9600K in the majority of titles.. (facepalm)
The Ryzen 2600X can be clocked to about 4.3GHZ all cores stable MAX and that's about it.. 8600K and 9600K eclipse that OC all day long.. Also never mind that you MUST get lower timing RAM for the Ryzens but Intel CPUs don't even care. Price is really irrelevant but seems important to most people whining about Intel CPU prices.. That's funny. .. Also the direct competition is technically the Ryzen 2600X & i7-8700K with 6 cores and 12 threads NOT an i5-9600K with 6 cores and 6 threads.. If you're going to compare CPUs you might as well put equal core and thread counts against each other, and run multi threading perfomance as well instead of cherry picking what CPUs are compared.. All that said i'm still interested in seeing where the new Ryzens will be when they get released.
@part1cle Not as good for streaming as a CPU with multi threading. This wasn't a true comparison any way. If you're going to compare CPUs you need to compare CPUs with the same core count and same thread count.. i5-8600k and 9600k have 6 cores and 6 threads. The 2600X is 6 cores and 12 threads so technically the 2600X and the i7-8700K are direct competitors, not the i5-8600k or i5-9600K.
It's not like everybody can afford a 9900K either, that cpu is pointless xD
*says the 9600k is better than the 9900k*
*shows Screenshots how much better the 9900k is*
He doesn't even tell us what gpu he used for those benchmarks and what cpu cooler he's using. How does this video have so many likes?
I think you should pay more attention to the video and don't just watch parts of it before commenting.