Pritam Singh answers question on why Leon Perera's driver was not interviewed on Nicole Seah affair

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 445

  • @johnlim4289
    @johnlim4289 Рік тому +87

    I would prefer Mr Nair spend his valuable time and intellect on debating more pressing issues such as inflation.

    • @lynlyncc
      @lynlyncc Рік тому +5

      brownie point scored

    • @lzm82
      @lzm82 Рік тому +5

      what intellect?

    • @馬良-b8q
      @馬良-b8q Рік тому +2

      Thot PS himself also ask similar questions on similar issues. Double standard? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @PPGGGGGGGGGGGGG
      @PPGGGGGGGGGGGGG Рік тому +1

      Seriously waste of taxpayers' money to talk about the scandals!

    • @MTMT-wm2dq
      @MTMT-wm2dq Рік тому +3

      Ah Nair zero intelligence !!!

  • @garethl738
    @garethl738 Рік тому +220

    Good questions Vikram. I just wish you asked your own PM the same questions on TCJ & CLH.

    • @royywj
      @royywj Рік тому +20

      Who dares to question the hands that feeds? Bo bian.

    • @jarrenloke2120
      @jarrenloke2120 Рік тому +12

      The difference is that PM Lee said he knew about it 2 years ago, while Pritam is lying about WP members being so gullible and naive that none of them speak or contacted the driver on such serious allegation between 2 heavy weight in WP. Another take it to grave incident that goes wrong. Leon and Nicole are important assets to WP, and there is good reason why Pritam wish to take it to grave. But as Singaporeans, Pritam is not a person to be trusted.

    • @mohamadromzee7394
      @mohamadromzee7394 Рік тому +4

      Whether they need to interview the whistleblower / or he was already interviewed is irrelevant because TJC already admitted which corroborates the account of the whistleblower. It's not the same case with the WP.

    • @user-pt2pc5uf1g
      @user-pt2pc5uf1g Рік тому +14

      Vikram looks n behaves like a guai lan abnn. Likely be the 4th one to bring disrepute or trouble to the party

    • @lynlyncc
      @lynlyncc Рік тому +4

      he trying to score brownie points

  • @lovebeautyintegrity6261
    @lovebeautyintegrity6261 Рік тому +147

    vickram should ask PM the same questions he asked pritam

    • @westwoodly
      @westwoodly Рік тому +8

      Both did answer the same question, but somehow one seems sincere while the other beats around the bush and throw smoke, if you listen carefully and visually.

    • @168heng
      @168heng Рік тому +13

      Yes. Vickram l would like to hear you ask LHL the same question. If you got the guts

    • @mr.g702
      @mr.g702 Рік тому

      Sadly Vickram is just a stooged. Well-curated questions that are only to strip others and not work for the benefit of the people. That is how the PAP under LHL works.

    • @jslam1232
      @jslam1232 Рік тому +1

      Of course he won’t. He is just another sycophant. Wayang in front of his master in the hopes of becoming a minister one day.

    • @chambersr4697
      @chambersr4697 Рік тому +1

      i just wonder how wld it be like if JBJ waS AROUND NOW in parliament

  • @lltan3138
    @lltan3138 Рік тому +162

    I don't know why our MPs are so interested in debating all these personal love affair in the Parliament? A bit embarrassing to be honest.

    • @gha9543
      @gha9543 Рік тому

      OUTRAGE OF WOMEN'S MODESTY IN POLITICS 😁 THE CREAM AT THE TOP HAS SOLIDIFY INTO HARD CHEESE ???

    • @Ben-kh2rh
      @Ben-kh2rh Рік тому +3

      Tax payers money 👌

    • @jarrenloke2120
      @jarrenloke2120 Рік тому +17

      Pritam is a compulsive liar and this need to be expose

    • @westwoodly
      @westwoodly Рік тому +2

      Basically to score political points, and to cover their hinds with legendary lawyer's intrigues and legalism. For example, did you peruse the ENTIRE interview - if you have listened to the press conference "CAREFULLY" - WHICH I DON'T THINK HE DID - ........" (how to verify there and then?) Somehow the explanation didn't come cross frankly or sincerely - a certain element is lacking vis-a-vis the body language. Army lingo - trying to smoke or 'siam'.

    • @jameswilliam26
      @jameswilliam26 Рік тому +2

      It was political point scoring, and setting up the episode to be used in future General Elections to accuse the Workers' Party of not having a whistleblower policy or not protecting whistleblowers. Mark my words. This will happen.

  • @limethan6991
    @limethan6991 Рік тому +34

    This segment has become a stage where each party tries to show that they are more just, more moral and more transparent. Why and is this what Singaporean need?

  • @samloo8529
    @samloo8529 Рік тому +109

    Why would personal matters be a topic for parliament while we are in the midst of an inflation, with the possibility of a depression? Address real issues please.

    • @Ben-kh2rh
      @Ben-kh2rh Рік тому +2

      Clowns?

    • @jarrenloke2120
      @jarrenloke2120 Рік тому +1

      it's like egg in the face of wp moment. of course pap need to dig into the wound.. its obvious the WP is in deep trouble now.

    • @TerenceTHNg
      @TerenceTHNg Рік тому

      Nothing more important to query. More pressing issues to discuss

    • @logicrule
      @logicrule Рік тому +1

      get rid of oppositions, waste of time

  • @shun9142
    @shun9142 Рік тому +43

    Oh please please ... come on .. can parliament focus on how to address the high costs of living .. oh goodness

    • @RJadventure
      @RJadventure Рік тому

      So true!

    • @sgcitizen1063
      @sgcitizen1063 3 місяці тому

      Their relationship is a private matter and as long as they never abuse the power as WP members, what is wrong with that? It the same as the members of PAP, it is a private matter.

  • @TiaraDalmeida-hf4zp
    @TiaraDalmeida-hf4zp Рік тому +11

    Never heard of Mr Nair till today. What has he been doing for SG? Mr Nair, there are more important issues to tackle. Don't be useless despite drawing a fat salary.

  • @yk597
    @yk597 Рік тому +49

    I mean seriously the parliament MPs and Ministers are paid so well to ask/answer these queries? this has turned into a circus.

    • @westwoodly
      @westwoodly Рік тому

      ...basically the people and Opposition are curious to know, so the MPs must play to the gallery and satisfy them. Should learn from the PRC Chinese when they dismissed their foreign ministers. It makes 1 billion Chinese curious but happy - except for the nosy western media.

  • @heng-yewlim3074
    @heng-yewlim3074 Рік тому +45

    Now that Vikram raised it, who’s the whistleblower on TCJ?

    • @jarrenloke2120
      @jarrenloke2120 Рік тому +2

      Did WP ask the driver?

    • @BeachBoi1000
      @BeachBoi1000 Рік тому +3

      TCJ was asked by PM Lee to break up the relationship vs… the driver was sacked by Leon … so see the difference?

    • @鲁焚化炉
      @鲁焚化炉 Рік тому +1

      If there was a whistleblower on TCJ, his/her identity has been well protected. This is one of the key elements of a successful whistleblowing system.

  • @bobafett5757
    @bobafett5757 Рік тому +4

    *Great exchange here and both are so eloquent and smart and sharp*

  • @osmanzng8065
    @osmanzng8065 Рік тому +45

    We are more interested to know who made the surveillance video and uploaded it on social media. These are all valid questions.

    • @westwoodly
      @westwoodly Рік тому

      Who "we"? "We" are not interested to peep into the intimate affairs of others though understandably it's innate in humans - in any party. It's voyeurism. Just quietly remove them from office. It's already an embarrassment and save their children and innocent people from further embarrassment. Should learn from the PRC Chinese practice regarding their new foreign minister - they have 5000 years of history you know. But the western media insist on knowing and wanting to embarrass the CPC, its government and the country. Lee Kuan Yew once even said that the west (aka CIA) offer to bribe him lack that finesse and wisdom.

    • @jHJHJjHidie
      @jHJHJjHidie Рік тому

      Of cos it’s tan dog jin and the fox Cheng li Hui

    • @takanna
      @takanna Рік тому

      confirm PAP 😂

  • @beezlebub9
    @beezlebub9 Рік тому +50

    4:01 lol. Never seen Vikram Nair so active when questioning PAP policies. Suddenly so active, now. What a joke, hahaha! 5:00 so then why do we not even know how TCJ’s indiscretions we’re found out? Perhaps we should query that? And when their affair actually started? Surprisingly, VN’s ethics are not offended by his party members more egregious affair. Hypocrite

    • @skillworldwide
      @skillworldwide Рік тому +2

      Water found a body, and residents drinking for weeks ❤❤❤❤❤❤

    • @lynlyncc
      @lynlyncc Рік тому +5

      he trying to score brownie points

    • @skillworldwide
      @skillworldwide Рік тому +2

      Why he never bring the question to PM Lee.

    • @westwoodly
      @westwoodly Рік тому +1

      "Perhaps we should query that?" I would paraphase and echo Pritam's reply for you - have you perused my [PM's] speech or press interviews - OBVIOUSLY YOU DID NOT!). As a result, same questions are asked again and again, and same answers are given again and again, albeit in different words or phrases. Precis or executive summary is obviously not a forte of the MPs. Any Tom, Dick and Harry in the street would be bored down with the "showdown" in Parliament saved the law-trained and practising lawyer PMs. Lawyers - and interrogators as well - are legendary in asking questions again and again in different forms and phrases till you are too tired and unwittingly fall into their trap with a simple yes or no.

    • @鲁焚化炉
      @鲁焚化炉 Рік тому

      Are these posts by foreigners?!😝

  • @jabezalantan6357
    @jabezalantan6357 Рік тому +26

    Vikram making himself sound like a fool on both questions
    1. There was only an allegation from one person. No other source or any evidence at all.
    2. WP was not the one who revealed the identity of the whistle blower.

    • @xuzhixin2011
      @xuzhixin2011 Рік тому

      The driver was fired by WP MP because he was whistle blower.

    • @jameswilliam26
      @jameswilliam26 Рік тому +2

      ​@@xuzhixin2011, and how did you know this?

    • @westwoodly
      @westwoodly Рік тому

      WP was not concerned about the affairs of the love birds, a side issue it seems. They have more important issues at hand like protecting their hinds and with the Sword of Damocles hanging over their head.

    • @jameswilliam26
      @jameswilliam26 Рік тому +1

      @@westwoodly, can you be clearer? What Sword of Damocles?

    • @westwoodly
      @westwoodly Рік тому

      @@jameswilliam26 My pleasure! I would attempt in the inimitable Pritam's style thus : If you have read the many news reports you will find the answer there - but I think you did not - but I will answer your question nevertheless. This concerns the court case where top WP personnel was charged and indeed found guilty but the sentence is yet to be meted out. I hope the answer will gratify you.

  • @davel7994
    @davel7994 Рік тому +27

    I cannot believe my tax dollars are paying for such useless questions.

  • @therunningpianist
    @therunningpianist Рік тому +23

    You should see the kind of narcissistic behaviour Vikram Nair is capable of in Rajah & Tann. All PAP MPs have this same narcissistic trait. Disgusting.

    • @shinholee3788
      @shinholee3788 Рік тому

      Could not agree with you more....

    • @hairolzainal540
      @hairolzainal540 Рік тому

      you guys are law interns?? what did vikram do!

    • @beezlebub9
      @beezlebub9 Рік тому

      I’ll not be surprised - look at his body language.

  • @wangchung7599
    @wangchung7599 Рік тому +10

    0:15 Was the video leaked by Leon's driver? This is interesting.
    How did Vikram Nair know about this? Is that a fact or his assumption?

  • @marinazai9086
    @marinazai9086 Рік тому +9

    Vickram Nair! U must be a joke!
    What "CREDIBLE" evidence are u talking about?

  • @MartinHao19
    @MartinHao19 Рік тому +53

    WP still serves a very viable role of providing a credible opposition. Any government, no matter how proficient, should still be held accountable as the public demands more transparency. Perhaps the key benefit of seeing such a sizeable number of MPs this past four years is that Singaporeans are now cognisant about the need for more opposition in Parliament as a check and balance. The WP, to their credit, have played this role very well.

    • @Scambuster491
      @Scambuster491 Рік тому +6

      Played very well with Raaesah Khan and Leon Perrera indeed 😂😂😂

    • @fattboy3542
      @fattboy3542 Рік тому +2

      ​@@Scambuster491 and how about u?

    • @fattboy3542
      @fattboy3542 Рік тому +2

      ​@@Scambuster491 To be impartial, you could have name several more from the other side as well.

    • @jarrenloke2120
      @jarrenloke2120 Рік тому

      PAP wannabe party PSP are hoping to steal the thunder from WP now..

    • @westwoodly
      @westwoodly Рік тому +1

      Nowadays some people want more and more transparency. Already our girls are wearing shorter and shorter shorts, and yet the people want more transparency. On the other hand, another group want to cover themselves from head to toe - no transparency, no image, no form or silhouette even. : )

  • @iuh75
    @iuh75 Рік тому +18

    The driver was ignored. Let the matter rest despite everyone already knowing abt it. He hoped that the matter wld not get exposed. Its the same consistent approach similar to Khan's case.

    • @sian1of2
      @sian1of2 Рік тому +7

      The video proves that the decision not to investigate was wrong. Wait for things to happen rather than probe further to confirm. If this is how they do things, SG sure die in their hands.

    • @westwoodly
      @westwoodly Рік тому

      Let's get on with the task of saving the environment and preventing climate change by reconsidering whether imposing a fee on plastic bags from supermarket really is saving the environment and preventing or mitigating climate change. My neighbour's wet refuse and dripping wet kitchen waste are causing odour pollution in the estate.

  • @frazel22
    @frazel22 Рік тому +34

    Why would there be a need to interview the driver when the WP knew :-
    1. The driver was about to be terminated
    2. The driver did not have any corroborative evidence?
    Is Mr Nair saying that for every allegation one receives, one must follow up with an interview?
    As of 8/4/2023, I take the position that the WP is also a dirty party like the PAP.
    @iljewels post below points that there may be a corroborative evidence in the form of a dashcam.
    I am sure the WP knew of this device and could have asked the driver to produce it but they did not.
    Therefore, the WP is as dirty as the PAP.

    • @liquidpaper31
      @liquidpaper31 Рік тому +1

      it also depends on the severity of the allegation + the nature of the allegation in the context of the MP's position as an MP???

    • @jarrenloke2120
      @jarrenloke2120 Рік тому +10

      Pritam behaviour sound like a king who doesn't listen to peasants warning about sin or crime. that is just the story. but in reality WP do know about the affair and they choose to take it to grave because Leon and Nicole are important assets to WP

    • @Whatis2468
      @Whatis2468 Рік тому +7

      Why not? Obviously Pritam is covering up.

    • @westwoodly
      @westwoodly Рік тому +7

      WP and Pritam appeared not so interested in the affair, or half-heartedly. Better to terkan the PAP than his own people. He too knew about the affair long before the release of the video (by the driver?) because the affair was not carried out covertly or discreetly. It was a prized catch? Pritam's hands were forced once the incriminating video was circulated and PAP took action on its own accord. Pritam using his legal schooling to smoke and smoke if you listen carefully or read between the lines.

    • @edwinpoon
      @edwinpoon Рік тому +2

      Lolz u obviously a WP IB... If someone accused your MPs of conduct issues, even if it's a soon to be fired disgruntled employee, wouldn't you interview the person? U can still dismiss the allegations thereafter. Also, the video itself stands as corroborative evidence, so u have an accuser with a video, and ur WP only asked the accused for their responses, and not the accuser.

  • @zerocurry
    @zerocurry Рік тому +7

    Wish Pritam could have been more upfront like PM Lee. Address the issue and say where u fell short. Pritam has ignored a credible source even though he has no corroboration. Whistleblowers seldom do.

    • @HenryTan-pj2oi
      @HenryTan-pj2oi Рік тому

      This Pritam is very like Tharman... ... Talk talk talk talk talk talk... ... but even excuses are so ridiculous. In the end, leave things to them and the result... ... hahahahahahahaha... ...
      But the game is like this, initially it will be such then a couple of steps then... ... doing nothing, power will roll right to my mouth but... ...
      I decide Singapore should have another fate... ... just punishment for being 'like that'. Hee hee hee hee hee... ...
      Have fun.

  • @jeepersh
    @jeepersh Рік тому +35

    Frankly embarrassing that this issue is being discussed and dug into in parliament. Far more important issues at hand.

    • @cnaizhen
      @cnaizhen Рік тому +2

      I agree. This questioning, the questioning about Iswaran's pay, questioning into the use of tone (rape, etc) are just political jabs that serve frankly no purpose other than to slap dirt on the political opponent.

    • @bobafett5757
      @bobafett5757 Рік тому +1

      We need to know why they went to the hotel and any tax payer money involved or not ?

    • @jeepersh
      @jeepersh Рік тому

      @@bobafett5757 even if they did, you want to waste more taxpayers’ money on investigating?
      Both infidelities should be handled within their respective parties. There are more important issues that should be focused on. Why are PHV and car-sharing taking up our COEs and driving up prices, whilst also severely contributing to accidents/offences on the road? Address cost of living (we already know it’s because Singapore has to import everything).
      If such trivial matters (whether infidelity is trivial is subjective, in the grand scheme of a COUNTRY, it is trivial IMO) were already kept hidden, imagine what else they are hiding from us Singaporeans who voted for them.

    • @bobafett5757
      @bobafett5757 Рік тому +1

      @@jeepersh Every investigation is already costing money so why the double standard and do you know what is work ethic and ignoring it means no intergrity and do you want to be governed like that ?

    • @jeepersh
      @jeepersh Рік тому

      @@bobafett5757 so just continue to waste taxpayers’ money on every investigation, regardless of how meaningless it is?
      I could care less about the infidelities by the four individuals from both parties. Their infidelities have no impact or consequences on my life nor my family and friends.
      You mean these infidelities are the only case of a lack of integrity? I refuse to believe so, I’m sure there are more cases of lack of integrity, lack of morals, corruption and nepotism at the top level of both private and public sectors in Singapore, and that to me, is far more important than airing of dirty laundry in PARLIAMENT.

  • @wilsontanjunwei
    @wilsontanjunwei Рік тому +1

    he is trying so hard to impress his fellow colleagues by questioning Pritam lol. YOU THE BEST PRITAM

  • @bobafett5757
    @bobafett5757 Рік тому +7

    *Honestly one doesnt need to look for any further corroborating evidence cos Nicole is the subject matter and both Leon and Nicole are in the same party so what else is required to build a solid foundation in investigating on the matter raised by the driver when everyone knows everybody in that circle ?*

  • @takanna
    @takanna Рік тому +1

    im surprised no one burst out laughing at how savage PS was, in the last 5 seconds of this exchange.

    • @vecspace
      @vecspace Рік тому

      You mean evasive?

    • @takanna
      @takanna Рік тому +1

      @@vecspace nah not evasive. PS flat out said NO

    • @vecspace
      @vecspace Рік тому

      @takanna after evading for the whole period explaining nothing. Since No is obviously a terrible answer, except it is better to say No than to say sorry I lied

    • @beezlebub9
      @beezlebub9 Рік тому

      @@vecspaceyou not a nuanced person lah. So you cannot get roasted or you’ll be very thick-skinned

  • @ngjunya8402
    @ngjunya8402 Рік тому +9

    The driver is not called for interview ???!! PS wanted to "take it to the grave" again ?? LOL. The driver was the first one to circulate such matter to WP leadership and those statement was found out as TRUTH lately on the Nicole-Perera affair. The driver should be interviewed as in normal circumstances, he is the whistle-blower. Damn WP, trying to hide something ?

    • @winwinwin282828
      @winwinwin282828 Рік тому

      while LHL did not even bother to hide the fact that he kept the truth from the public for 3 years.....

  • @Ktc99999-b
    @Ktc99999-b Рік тому +2

    Did your PM inform the cabinet in 2020 when he found out about the affair?

  • @hairibob2439
    @hairibob2439 Рік тому +7

    Seems like Vikram ask question going round & round ... There are many challenge in this world Singapore are trying to manage and yet this Vikram interested on scandel story only

  • @anizar00
    @anizar00 Рік тому +3

    The classic tactic where the pot is calling the kettle black. We, the people are struggling with high cost of living and low wages, and here, our politicians are busy debating on extra-marital affairs of their members. Get some real work done for heaven sake! You are paid millions!

  • @rosaana6190
    @rosaana6190 Рік тому +7

    Yes! Thanks Mr Vikram!

    • @MartinHao19
      @MartinHao19 Рік тому +3

      Bs he has no standards for the PM does he

    • @MartinHao19
      @MartinHao19 Рік тому

      Pap is a CLOWN gov

    • @MartinHao19
      @MartinHao19 Рік тому +3

      If he is so great why don’t u hold PM accountable too RUBBISH QUESTION

    • @vincecarlo
      @vincecarlo Рік тому

      Vikram Scored OWN Goal
      Looked like a FOOL

  • @jeremyalg8192
    @jeremyalg8192 Рік тому +3

    Another MPs trying to score brownie point ending up getting a cake in his face.

  • @gala1078
    @gala1078 Рік тому +18

    Pritam is on fire today must have been waiting for PAP to screw up for many years already cannot waste the opportunity.....lol

    • @westwoodly
      @westwoodly Рік тому

      He was throwing stones while living in glass houses. As a leader of the opposition with extra perks, he must be seen to be an opposition leader. Whether he has done a good job or not, that's not the point.

    • @gala1078
      @gala1078 Рік тому

      @@westwoodly He is not the only one throwing stones while living in a glass house. Pritam did what he thinks is best and i think its a smart move he is not going to get anything out of the PAP by saying all these but don't forget that parliament seesion is broadcast live now and all those questions are to throw doubts about the PAP into the viewers minds. Optics is the trending word if you have been following politics in SG.

  • @bobafett5757
    @bobafett5757 Рік тому +2

    *Can CNA interview Uncle Frankie the driver so we can get clearer understanding ?*

  • @hiroyukishinichi9873
    @hiroyukishinichi9873 Рік тому +35

    Because Prata Singh's definition of 'investigation' is....
    Driver/ Whistleblower reports.
    PS asked Leon P + Nicole Seah: "Did you do it?"
    Accused: "No"
    **End of investigation.🙄🙄🙄

    • @CalvinK-the_old_fogey
      @CalvinK-the_old_fogey Рік тому +14

      Pritam: Dei Thamby, keep your hands off Nic, Ok?
      Leon: Yes Boss!
      Pritam: OK, case closed.

    • @PapSucks
      @PapSucks Рік тому

      @@CalvinK-the_old_fogey After all, the same standards should be applied, regardless of political affiliation.
      The issue becomes even more significant considering that Tan Chuan-Jin was the Speaker of Parliament, a position wielding considerable authority.

    • @PapSucks
      @PapSucks Рік тому

      After all, the same standards should be applied, regardless of political affiliation.
      The issue becomes even more significant considering that Tan Chuan-Jin was the Speaker of Parliament, a position wielding considerable authority.

    • @PapSucks
      @PapSucks Рік тому

      How about prate PM

    • @MartinHao19
      @MartinHao19 Рік тому +5

      After all, the same standards should be applied, regardless of political affiliation.
      The issue becomes even more significant considering that Tan Chuan-Jin was the Speaker of Parliament, a position wielding considerable authority.

  • @thinkpadx60
    @thinkpadx60 Рік тому +3

    this is like school yard tit for tat...

  • @fizywizzie
    @fizywizzie Рік тому +8

    i dont think vickram should ask about the whistle blower question. it sort of backfire on the PAP. xD

  • @winstorn1
    @winstorn1 Рік тому +10

    You give evasing answers. The important is that you dont even interview or at least investigate the driver complaint not once but many times. What standard is WP will be for Singapore if they replace PAP

    • @PapSucks
      @PapSucks Рік тому

      What standards better standards then pap

    • @alvinmah6148
      @alvinmah6148 Рік тому +4

      That’s the evasive prata singh.

  • @MartinHao19
    @MartinHao19 Рік тому +11

    HOW ABOUT PAP lying about the 99 year lease it wasn’t WP lying about that BS

  • @chiakum
    @chiakum Рік тому +2

    I think the house rules is that MPs to address to Speaker not directly to each other

  • @vincecarlo
    @vincecarlo Рік тому +4

    Why DIDN'T Vikram Ask PM regarding TCJ n Ms Cheng Liason ?
    Typical L-A-C-K-E-Y trying to Score Point but OWN Goal

  • @ismailalialiali1216
    @ismailalialiali1216 Рік тому +3

    Once there is an Indian leader in any Singapore organization, you will see full of Indians in the organisation. Example: MAS, DBS, etc etc. When an Indian PM in Singapore, die die parliament full of Indian.

  • @cccoke
    @cccoke Рік тому +2

    Anyone bothered to check how come the press was quick to approach the ex driver for an interview so soon after the video was leaked....a video that allegedly was from 2020 or 2021?

  • @jeremysng4214
    @jeremysng4214 Рік тому +1

    A clear animosity btw these 2.

  • @stephenman3846
    @stephenman3846 Рік тому +7

    Act blur live longer

    • @ssvegeto1610
      @ssvegeto1610 Рік тому +5

      @@JoeLee18 no the blur one is you pretending not to see Pritam's blatant lies

  • @Hs5687
    @Hs5687 Рік тому +17

    “Video by Mr Pereira’s Driver “ … how does he know Video is by Mr Pereira’s Driver ?

    • @johnlim8668
      @johnlim8668 Рік тому +1

      My sentiments are similar to yours. How in the world to protect/conceal the identity when the whistleblower came out with information being the driver of Leon?

    • @Hs5687
      @Hs5687 Рік тому

      @@johnlim8668 These Guys know that PM has Parachuted his Subordinates into AGC & Presidential Office . They also know We Not Only do not have an Ombudsman But strangely No Whistleblower Protection also … Parliament all Wayang , there is no Real Oppo …

  • @RobinRonin77
    @RobinRonin77 Рік тому +12

    yooooo pretty sure we have better societal issues to discuss on than these scandals😭 move on pls

  • @Yeon8888
    @Yeon8888 Рік тому +3

    Why my country parliament become Korean drama ? Nothing better to discuss already Ah.

  • @ahong5746
    @ahong5746 Рік тому +2

    Mr nair still got a long way to go .

  • @logicrule
    @logicrule Рік тому +5

    Pritam won't protect anyone, just throw people under the bus like RK

    • @logicrule
      @logicrule Рік тому +1

      @@chanangeline7489 lol, no PS needed to save his own skin, it's how his party works, throw people under the bus, he was clearly trying to hide then, even now with Perera and Nicole... wants all glory, but no responsibility at all, bad leader

  • @sgfuture7114
    @sgfuture7114 Рік тому +55

    Vikram try to be a hero but end up being a joke 😂😂😂

    • @stephenman3846
      @stephenman3846 Рік тому +11

      naa man, in this case , he did asked a valid question

    • @BhabSonsDaughters
      @BhabSonsDaughters Рік тому

      definitely coming from a pappy buah carrier

    • @PapSucks
      @PapSucks Рік тому

      @@stephenman3846no he didn’t a rubbish question

    • @Jaymore639
      @Jaymore639 Рік тому +4

      Yes he checkmate pritam

    • @ssvegeto1610
      @ssvegeto1610 Рік тому +6

      The joke is Pritam and his supporters, who blindly believe he didn't know about the affair and Pritam thinking he can sweep things under the rug and trick the rest of the Singaporeans who have a brain

  • @blose4793
    @blose4793 Рік тому +4

    Since extra-marital affairs are so common in both WP and PAP parties, should both parties endorse such activities.

    • @goofy2299
      @goofy2299 Рік тому +1

      this qn shd be asked by leong mun wai 😂

    • @westwoodly
      @westwoodly Рік тому

      @@goofy2299 His reply : "You know since EMA are common in both parties they should endorse it. Hehehe! I was just joking, Mr Speaker!"

    • @windydragon6522
      @windydragon6522 Рік тому

      Lky did say before one man one woman may need evaluating? Not sure about that. Hopefully IB’s can help clarify.

  • @johnnyong2341
    @johnnyong2341 Рік тому +3

    Hello, why need to interview driver? He is not involved.. hehehe..😅 are you running out of options..

  • @jtbroker
    @jtbroker Рік тому +1

    gotta say VN lost this one badly lol

  • @bobafett5757
    @bobafett5757 Рік тому +6

    *Pritams on fire here and dont think any PAP member can catch up with him except for Shan who possibly can match up with him cos both are very focus lawyer but eventually I think Shan can go around the full circle when Pritam is less being alert*

  • @spiderjump
    @spiderjump Рік тому +6

    If I were Pritam , I would at least speak to the driver in person once . This would allow Pritam to assess the driver . To read his body language etc . IMO Pritam did not do so because he was too busy and did not want it to be true .

    • @iljewels
      @iljewels Рік тому

      No collaborative evidence got WP swept it under the carpet. Just request for the dashcam

    • @spiderjump
      @spiderjump Рік тому

      @@iljewels dashcam wont capture what it is in the car. even if it did show nicole and lp in car ..unless they are kissing or whatever it means lp gave ns a lift in his car

    • @shurakishi4707
      @shurakishi4707 Рік тому +4

      i don't think this view is correct. Leon Parera's driver and any issues the driver has with Leon Parera is his own matter to bear. It is a matter between employer-employee. Is the driver a WP member? I don't remember there being any info that the driver is a WP member.
      Even if Pritam Singh wants to interview the driver - why does the driver need to compell to the interview request?
      Also, even if the interview goes through - and the driver gives all the spicy info about the affair. Pritam would still need to corroborate with the couple right?
      And that he did (even without the interview) - and they lied and now they have resigned (if not Pritam did say he would have sacked the both of them)

  • @BhabSonsDaughters
    @BhabSonsDaughters Рік тому +8

    Vikram sees a huge vacuum in the indian quota

    • @vincecarlo
      @vincecarlo Рік тому +1

      He Married a Chinese though

  • @marinekong235
    @marinekong235 Рік тому +1

    The driver is not employed by WP, therefore the issue is not within the "organisation". So what authority does PS has over the driver who is an external entity. If a friend of my son tells me my son has committed theft, what authority then do i have to interview the friend and am i even obliged to do so?

  • @elainek1195
    @elainek1195 Рік тому +6

    Huh? Why waste time and tax payers' money discussing this in parliamentary session. There are more impending issues to deliberate on. 🤯

  • @cccoke
    @cccoke Рік тому +3

    Aiyah...both sides had people with indiscretions? I still think a Speaker and an MP affair is more damaging and has a higher conflict of interest than an MP and a member of his party who isn't a MP but that's just my perceived view 😅 Anyways there are more pressing matters like the cost of living, housing, employment of locals, the ratio of new migrants etc to debate about that going in circles and slinging mud at each other....or is this just a way of seeing who is the last man standing? If so, I am disgusted by both parties....but the PAP started this gutter politics first.

  • @jarrenloke2120
    @jarrenloke2120 Рік тому +11

    Pritam is trying very hard to cover up another take it to grave incident. and cooking up some unbelievable story of why the entire WP team doesn't interview or talk to the driver. if Singapore is rule by WP we are finished

    • @jarrenloke2120
      @jarrenloke2120 Рік тому +3

      The truth I believe is WP knew about the affair and they decided to cover up because Leon and Nicole are important assets to WP. Another classic take it to Grave..this is bad for the morale and I am sure we will start to see a drop on quality of WP debate henceforth

  • @philippackiamuthu3613
    @philippackiamuthu3613 Рік тому +1

    Vikram, go and do something better which pleases your boss, LHL and don't intrude into others love affairs. Leave them alone. Dont be a busy body. Discuss on bread and butter issues that can help the citizens with the sky rocketing price. Enough is enough Vikram Nair.

  • @Whatis2468
    @Whatis2468 Рік тому +12

    Isnt clear that Pritam is trying to cover up? Just like he did for Reesah Khan's case where he threw her under the bus.

  • @choysum
    @choysum Рік тому +1

    Answer is no.. the identity of the driver is not protected.. already revealed by saying informant is the driver.

  • @limsoopeng8432
    @limsoopeng8432 Рік тому +1

    Gentlemen. I am worried what is happening on the street. Such as, not allow to bring water and consume in the coffee shop, extra chilli 15cents, fish soup 4 slices $10, plastic bags charged 10cents at Watson etc. I know those such issues discussed about what had happened in both parties are informative but i am think the parliament should be more concerned on those topics, i have mentioned. I am afraid that may escalate into street violence. Hope you will consider my suggestions.

  • @unsulliedthe832
    @unsulliedthe832 Рік тому +2

    Singaporeans at large seem to highly regard lawyers (perhaps also because LKY was also a lawyer) but elsewhere in developed nations, lawyers are seen as shady blood-suckers with no moral compass, the scums of any society and the butt of many a joke. Here's one I recall of a comic sketch: A boy and his mother pass by a gravestone with the following inscription - "Here lies a lawyer and a good man". Whereupon the boy asks his mother: "Why do they bury two men in one grave?"! (the moral - no lawyer can ever be a good man!)

  • @HO7SIM37
    @HO7SIM37 7 місяців тому

    Then anybody interviewed tcj, clh, Michael Palmers driver?

  • @johnny-ih5es
    @johnny-ih5es Рік тому +2

    Vikram Naive is wasting time.
    The creation and the uncanny timing of the Perera/Seah video leak does suggests it was a black operation.
    The intention of the exposure is more likely to damage the reputation of an organization rather than to safeguard it against unethical behaviour of its staff.

  • @user-ov6hs1go4k
    @user-ov6hs1go4k Рік тому +11

    I thought vikram was competent and would be more prepared and relevant when posing questions. It appears to me that vikram does not even know what he is talking about and possibly made a fool of himself in the eyes of many.

  • @godsamazinggrace5331
    @godsamazinggrace5331 Рік тому +1

    Is parliament supposed to be like that??
    Debating all the time
    Instead of finding ways to resolve issues for the sg common people they are"serving"??
    Pap will debate/argue all the way to say they are right and everyone else is wrong!!

  • @brandenongkp
    @brandenongkp Рік тому +2

    The poor driver lost his job and his family suffered as a result.

    • @twocows5785
      @twocows5785 Рік тому +1

      need to mind his own business.

  • @bowlampar
    @bowlampar Рік тому +8

    Pritam Singh🧔‍♂🧔‍♂: "That is WP internal affair, it has no place in Singapore Parliament. We are not here to debate political party MP' juicy' affair, only Singapore's affair. "

    • @shinholee3788
      @shinholee3788 Рік тому +1

      Let it be very very clear.....It is not Pritam who brought up the WP internal affair but Vickram is the one ....Why don't you dircet your question to Vickram and PAP instead?....BIAS?

  • @ongernie7216
    @ongernie7216 Рік тому

    Scoring point.

  • @silentbliss7666
    @silentbliss7666 Рік тому +2

    Sweeping problems under the carpet .... If this is how our 'leaders' manage simple issues like adultery within their party, then can anyone guess what they do with bigger and more important issues?

    • @1965Singaporean
      @1965Singaporean Рік тому

      We need multiples leaders. Vote in other opposition, WP was good but now lousy.

  • @MrSansan9
    @MrSansan9 6 місяців тому

    I don’t even know this vikram exists until watching this video

  • @anglo-saxonconnor817
    @anglo-saxonconnor817 Рік тому +4

    Hahahaha.
    Here on the internet we have people writing to advocate the public not to pry into the private lives of the politicians that are caught in scandals and be moral police to judge and condemn them while in parliament house itself we have the whole house with everyone of them asking how things happened,what was done to restore the image and credibility of the political party and both sides taunt each other trying to attack and take a dig at each other integrity, trustability and morality.
    In simple words it means outside some of the public might be moral police and kaypoh chees and some are soothsayers trying to encourage the public not to get involved and worked up in the private lives of others but inside the parliament house the entire lot of them are responsible for providing the fuel and drama non stop by dedicating multiple sessions of parliamentary meeting to talk non stop on these matters.
    The madness of it all.
    No eyes to see this country anymore.
    The unwashed mass can be forgiven for not knowing better but when the so called creme of the crop in the country are doing these nonsense and gossips instead of their sworn national duties it is truly a disgrace to watch and listen to them already.
    If you are able to qualified to be in parliament you are supposed to be an elite and intellectual higher developed than the common people outside but ask yourselves what have you all been doing all these time in the parliament house. Theatrics,schemes and time wasting red herring endeavours.
    You all have become lost in life by now already without even realising it.

  • @supramaniamoliver8346
    @supramaniamoliver8346 9 місяців тому

    PS is very cool Mr. Nair he is very humble

  • @alanng4436
    @alanng4436 Рік тому +1

    Shiny object ... smoke ...

  • @dannykwan291
    @dannykwan291 Рік тому +1

    Can we stop this already, please? is this worth debating and keep poking affair issue? they have already reassigned and already accepted their punishment. Can we leave it alone and move on please.

  • @mindykaur8139
    @mindykaur8139 Рік тому +3

    Easy answer. 'No' takes the cake. 😅 Well done Mr Pritam Singh. True and fearless Warrior Lion and well qualified to be the next PM of SG. Majulah Singhapura

  • @fattboy3542
    @fattboy3542 Рік тому +2

    Both PAP & WP could have done better. Lets move on. Too many finger pointings and pantry gossips here....

  • @yatiyeo
    @yatiyeo Рік тому

    How he knows the video from driver????

  • @bobafett5757
    @bobafett5757 Рік тому +1

    *Wondering what the secretive couple went to the hotel for ?*

  • @feezp4518
    @feezp4518 Рік тому +1

    Interview ? But why ? Let's not waste time .. please move on.

  • @Ktc99999-b
    @Ktc99999-b Рік тому +1

    So these people get paid MP salary to debate these stuff?

    • @gha9543
      @gha9543 Рік тому

      To keep quiet until someone blow the whistles. ya , if tom can and harry did why dick get to do it ???

  • @M1dKnight1am
    @M1dKnight1am Рік тому

    Ill save you the time.
    Mr. Pritam says “No”

  • @sam65847
    @sam65847 Рік тому

    Haven't seen some of these MPs doing the same with far more bigger issues. 😂

  • @SutrisAhamed
    @SutrisAhamed Рік тому

    I think the debate is to cover the delay in taking action against TCJ affair 3 years ago.i used to admire the intergrity of the rulling party for many years but starting to fade away now

  • @ireneho848
    @ireneho848 Рік тому +1

    why is parliament held for vikram to ask and pursue details abt driver etc. tax payer money u know. there are more pressing and impt issues ............why so interested in details of affair

  • @steventay5834
    @steventay5834 3 місяці тому

    So PM Lee should interview those who post bad remarks about Ivan Lim?

  • @168heng
    @168heng Рік тому

    Can anyone throw a light. Is this Vikram Nair related to Devan Nair?

    • @unsulliedthe832
      @unsulliedthe832 Рік тому

      No Alcohol I Resign - another ah neh liability.

  • @dragonlee3388
    @dragonlee3388 Рік тому +2

    If Singapore govt refers itself to a MNC and its ministers are entitled to the similar high pay as MNC's directors, then their performances should also be justified similarly as MNC's directors. TCJ should have been fired for his lousy performance as the Manpower Minister back in 2012 and should not be transferred to another high position with high pay and then committed adultery with a female MP subsequently. In this case, PM like the CEO, takes full responsibility of his subordinates' performance. In MNCs no one is irreplaceable. Even if CEO performs badly, he has to resign. Remember, you are paid by the public, that's why you are called the public servant. The public expect your high pays ties closely with your excellent performances. Nothing more than that!!!

  • @0.1.feb.
    @0.1.feb. Рік тому

    WAKE UP, JAMUS LIM!

  • @evelynlee8725
    @evelynlee8725 Рік тому

    Did we pay high salaries to our MPs to debate such topics?

  • @Scambuster491
    @Scambuster491 Рік тому +8

    WP ownself check ownself.😂😂😂

    • @samloo8529
      @samloo8529 Рік тому +1

      Same same for PAP, so what's different?

    • @Scambuster491
      @Scambuster491 Рік тому +6

      @@samloo8529 haven’t win majority seats already ownself check ownself. Can’t imagine more WPs being voted in. Singaporeans should wake up and know who can do the work.

    • @brandenongkp
      @brandenongkp Рік тому +4

      WP doesn’t even bother to check , WP chief just dig a dark hole and buried it .

    • @Scambuster491
      @Scambuster491 Рік тому +1

      @@brandenongkp 😂

  • @xuzhixin2011
    @xuzhixin2011 Рік тому +6

    If cold blood is the reason why some people hate PAP, then Actually, some WP leaders snd MPs, including populist James, are more cold blood than PAP. I get this conclusion by observing how they treat “small” people. Ms Loh Peiying and Driver uncle are our predecessors, even if you have different empathy from their ways, throw you out.

    • @jarrenloke2120
      @jarrenloke2120 Рік тому +5

      Jamus Lim is a light weight as politicians all he care about is always looking into camera while addressing the parliament using his American accent and bombastic language which is both annoying and meaningless.

    • @kitty2527
      @kitty2527 Рік тому +2

      @@jarrenloke2120 I agree, i am not pro PAP OR WP, Jamus likes to be in the spotlight. He don't understand that speaking in a normal way like Prof Tommy Koh wins respect, with simple, straight to the point English and above all sincere.

    • @kitty2527
      @kitty2527 Рік тому +2

      I guess WP hope to bring everything to the grave. P.Singh likes to adopt a act blue approach and then tai chi to other ppl.

  • @joekerr8037
    @joekerr8037 Рік тому +1

    Bollywood !

  • @sabrecruz6721
    @sabrecruz6721 Рік тому +1

    Vikram is ARROGANT

  • @rubenjames2886
    @rubenjames2886 Рік тому +3

    MP Vikram Very Active.... well done😅

    • @PapSucks
      @PapSucks Рік тому

      A clown

    • @shaifultahir7125
      @shaifultahir7125 Рік тому +6

      wakakaka.. wat a joke....
      he should ask PM the same question instead..

  • @kelvinun6666
    @kelvinun6666 Рік тому +1

    Nothing better to do! Indulging in gossip. Got more important and more other serious to discuss.