PAY ME! Baby Reindeer's Real Life Martha TURNS ON Piers Morgan! DEMANDS $1 MILLION!? Piers Reacts!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 тра 2024
- PAY ME! Baby Reindeer's Real Life Martha TURNS ON Piers Morgan! DEMANDS $1 MILLION!? Piers Reacts!
Thumbnail images are satire created by adobe photoshop and artificial intelligence artwork.
Excerpt from Daily Record
Baby Reindeer's real life Martha demands £1m for Piers Morgan interview after £250 offer
Fiona Harvey is in a cash war with Piers Morgan after an explosive interview that has been viewed millions of times on his UA-cam channel.
The real-life Martha from Baby Reindeer last night slammed the £250 offered by Piers Morgan’ s firm for her exclusive interview.
Fiona Harvey, 58, is fuming after her appearance on his UA-cam Uncensored show made the host at least £250,000 already.
Excerpt from Business Insider
The woman outed as the alleged 'Baby Reindeer' stalker said she felt 'used' in Piers Morgan interview, where he asked her if she loves Richard Gadd
A woman who was outed by "Baby Reindeer" fans as the alleged stalker of the true crime drama's creator and lead actor said she felt "used" by Piers Morgan in an interview about the Netflix series.
"Baby Reindeer" tells a fictionalized version of creator Richard Gadd's experiences with stalking, and has become a worldwide phenomenon since its release in April. That month, an unnamed woman who was outed on social media as "the real Martha Scott" told the Daily Mail she was considering taking legal action against Gadd and Netflix for the harassment she has faced as a result of viewers trying to track her down.
On Wednesday, Morgan revealed he had interviewed Fiona Harvey, believed to be the woman first interviewed by the Daily Mail. The interview will be released Thursday at 3pm ET on Morgan's UA-cam channel, Piers Morgan Uncensored.
Excerpt from The Independent
Real-life Martha Scott from Baby Reindeer sits down for tell-all Piers Morgan interview
The show has already sparked a backlash among viewers
The woman who allegedly inspired Richard Gadd’s hit Netflix series Baby Reindeer will give her first TV interview this Thursday (9 May).
In the series, comedian Richard Gadd plays a fictionalised version of himself who gets stalked by a lonely and mentally ill woman called Martha, whom he meets while working at a pub.
Following the series’ success curious fans have tried to discover the inspirations behind the show, which members of the cast have vehemently discouraged.
Scottish lawyer Fiona Harvey, 58, who has been labelled the ‘real Martha’ has received death threats from Baby Reindeer viewers and will speak on Piers Morgan Uncensored to “set the record straight after being unmasked by fans”.
Excerpt from The Sun
‘STALKER’ UNMASKED ‘I’m very attractive and I’m a lawyer’, says ‘real Baby Reindeer stalker’ Fiona Harvey as she threatens Netflix
THE WOMAN thought to be the real-life stalker from Netflix smash Baby Reindeer is threatening to sue Netflix.
The gritty real-life drama was inspired by the ordeal suffered by Scots creator and leading man Richard Gadd, 34.
The harrowing tale follows barman Donny Dunn as his life falls apart at the hands of an obsessive stalker - played by Jessica Gunning, 38, - after he offers her a cup of tea in a London bar.
The deranged Baby Reindeer maniac bombarded the comic with more than 41,000 emails, 744 tweets, 100 pages of letters and 350 hours of voicemails over a four year reign of terror
Gadd claimed he went to great lengths to conceal the identity of the woman who stalked him in real life and has begged fans not to search for her.
S U P P O R T T H I S C H A N N E L:
Subscribe, Donate, & Follow Us Here: linktr.ee/AndySignore
And JOIN Our Community to become a Popcorned Planeteer, to really become a part of the team for Perks, Members Only Live Shows and EXCLUSIVE Videos & Replays: • Members-only videos
Popcorned Planet offers commentary on the biggest Celebrity News, Pop Culture Outrage and Viral Internet Stories from TikTok, Twitter, Instagram and beyond. Created and hosted by Andy Signore (creator of ScreenJunkies, Honest Trailers, MovieFights, Movie World and more). Popcorned Planet is your one stop place Daily News, Celebrity Drama, Hollywood insight and Pop Culture Commentary.
C O N T A C T / B U S I N E S S : PopcornedPlanetTeam@gmail.com
Or Send Packages, Toys & Fan Mail To:
Andy Signore
16350 Bruce B Downs Blvd
PO Box # 48742
Tampa FL, 33647
#babyreindeer #piersmorgan #richardgadd #martha #netflix #netflixseries #stalking #stalker #stalkeronline #johnnydepp #celebritynews #celebrity #news #celebritygossip #gossip
Scottish person here, If you look up her actual name before she changed it. There is evidence of her being a stalker.
She changed her name?
Her name was Fiona Muir @@Boudicca527
What was her name originally?
Her surname originally was Muir
Really?!? I’m NOT Surprised!!!!!😂
I think she is a vulnerable person, but also dangerous. I believe Richard Gadd has every right to tell his story. He's the victim.
His side though. There is his side, her side and then the truth
@@juliegray8731 amd that's why she wanted to go on talk tv to tell her side.
Agree but that means she should have had her say too to make that series a ‘true story’ Right now it is only true from one persons perspective. And that therefore is not the whole story.
@@DMGamandaI believe they said it was “based on a true story” that’s very different from being a “true story”
@@Vonononie No, it literally claims to be a "true story" without showing any actual proof of what was claimed in show to be true, like arrest, no record has been discovered to back up claim! Also, thousands of emails? No evidence of that ridiculous number, neither! You can't just say something, without backing up claim!
I knew Fiona was gonna get fixated with Piers Morgan when she started talking about their ‘shared unfortunate public persecutions’ and that’s why she wanted to speak with him only- that he could understand how wrong she has been treated! And quoting his age & his interview skills with serial killers- it was like she had a research paper on him…
Bingo! I knew it to when she went into all that b.s That's what stalkers do, try to connect and identify blah blah blah
Yes! 👍
You should check the article from the “National Post” about a Daily Mail writer (Neil Sears) who was targeted by Fiona. This woman is INSANE! People should stop giving her attention
Neil Sears from Daily Mail wrote an article about her and now she’s stalking him. Calling his phone non stop and leaving voicemails with hateful comments . She’s cray cray for real. They need to put her away and hold her accountable.
@@tamlynn786 She is boinging into the biggest rage she has ever experienced in her life and Piers better move or give her a million lol.
A stalker should not be able to profit from their CRIMES!! 😮😮😮🤔🤔🤔🤯🤯🤯
Also just because Richard clearly had serious issues, that doesn't mean she isn't responsible for her behaviour. She targeted a vulnerable person. While she may not have thought that at the time, its what happened.
I think people are just so sensitive these days. We're expected to know every facet of every other person's life. Yeah she's a mentally ill stalker, she's not capable of understanding Gadd's vulnerabilities for that exact reason.
I agree.
Piers did a big gulp when she said there was only a year difference in their age. Hope he doesn't have a busstop out front of his house 😜
Oh no, now shes latched onto Piers!? This woman! 😂😂😂😂
for a woman that says she has a photographic memory she couldn't remember a thing
No Piers was not flirting… this is classic British banter. Besides… he probably knows Lorraine well.
This. The 2 of them have worked together for years on breakfast / morning shows for ITV here in the UK. They have a very good working relationship.
Flirting is a HUGE part of British banter anyway. I can't say I've not utilised flirting in almost every professional relationship I ever had. Men or Women. It's nice to be nice and British people are generally nice.
She’s gonna start stalking Piers 😂😂
YES I knew it, I kinda laughed ahaha. You could see in his face, certain things she said, a little fear in his eyes ahahaha
😂😂
lol🤣😂
Maybe he should go by her house w/a cuppa tea?
@@blakesleyk.7166 She is probably by his hoping to get a glimpse and want to further discuss so he won't have far to go ahahahahah
A (British) Netflix producer who worked on the BR show, appeared before an enquiry in England about the steps Netflix undertook to make sure the real life character's privacy
was respected. And during that inquest, the producer confirmed that they had evidence that Fiona Harvey had in fact been convicted for stalking. I don't know if she spent any time behind bars though, as that question was never asked. A lot of the reasons people discovered Martha's real identity so easily, was because she put herself out there in the first place. She drew attention to herself because that's what she craves. And NOW she's complaining about being harassed online and receiving death threats as well as demanding 1.25 million pounds from Piers Morgan because she felt she'd been underpaid. If that's true, the only person to blame for that is Fiona herself. Plus, as the person who commented above me pointed out, the only reason she was able to hide this conviction or convictions about her past, was because after her conviction, she changed her name from Fiona "Muir" Harvey to just plain Fiona Harvey. Knowing full well that people would be trying to dig up dirt about her past but failing, because most of her run ins with the law were filed under the name "Fiona Muir- Harvey". So if you try to look up info on her using the name Fiona Harvey, very little would come up. I personally think this woman is completely unhinged, but at the same time she's crazy like a fox. And that makes her exceedingly scary.
I couldn't agree more.
Did you find anything on her under her old name?
@@gaysy1st Nah, I leave that for the internet sleuths. They're better at it.
@@gaysy1stShe did harass / stalk Laura Wray in the past under her old name, you may already know that
It is a tradition in Scotland that a daughter is given the maiden name of her mother as a middle name, if that is the case then her mothers maiden name is Muir and her mothers married name is Harvey. Not double barrelled, she didn't change her name, she just used her middle name or her surname, her name is Fiona Muir Harvey.
Wheres her big lawyer boyfriend that shes had for 5 years.
Partying hard with Santa, the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy.
L o l don't forget in the interview she unintentionaly exposed herself for still stalking him by keeping up with him on the internet... She said she was googling the weather when she came across his play that he did before the series. She knew everything about that play.
She actually knows everything about him all the way up until now lol 😮
Great point!
I caught that too. She said she "heard" he was doing a play. Why would she assume it was about her? It sure sounds like she did.
In all honesty, to me there’s very little difference between a stalker and a convicted stalker reputation wise.
Laura Wray confirmed that Fiona was the person who stalked her and her family. I think that’s pretty damning.
Maybe Netflix and Richard Gadd shouldn’t have said that it was a true story. But stalking is just wrong, and that part seems pretty true.
This is better than the series 😂😂😂
she cant sue for crap. whatever was in her contract prior to the show is what shes gets. you get what you deserve...not what you want. she should really get nothing.
Hold the phone-
This woman outed HERSELF, no one exposed her identity.
And my understanding is she was placed under a restraining order, which doesn't require incarceration.
She contradicted herself repeatedly in the Piers Morgan interview.
She's Martha, alright.
And she's not getting a dime for being a gold-digging psycho.
People did expose her identity before she went on Morgan's show.
@roelofvuurboom5939 If they did, "they" didn't get it to go viral.
Nobody had heard of her.
She sought out Piers Morgan.
She wanted it to go viral.
Now she's playing the blackmailing extortionist.
Don't make me laugh!
Her identity did go viral. Thats why she went on Morgan's show in the first place.
When he asked where she was from she denied being from Glasgow lol. The first minister Sir Donald Dewar was being stalked by her too and thats out there for everyone to see!!!
She would have been better off admitting to everything and suing for royalties over using her likeness and story without permission..
Nah, would never work. People don't have to get everybody's permission to tell their own story that includes them
As a 'lawyer' 🤭 you would think Fiona would know this, right? 🤣🤷🏼♀️😝
She made over 20 facebook updates in one day, she totally could have sent 41000 emails .. rough maths , 50 emails every day for two years. There no way netfix would run a show, say it's true, and have major plot points incorrect, that's why they haven't made a statement ...surely
Twenty Facebook updates in one day?! Are you serious?! I'm not on Facebook. And I'd be scared to follow her, there!
Keep scrolling. It’s more than that in some days. I counted 58 in one day on one of her accounts. :/
I dont know how someone has the time for that
Stalking the stalker. Does that cancel each other out? 😅
"This is a true story" only appears in the 1st episode.
In all episodes, in the credits it says :
"This program is based on real events: however certains characters, names, incidents, locations, and dialogue have been fictionalized for dramatic purposes".
So, this is a true story, and it fictionalized some parts, even trying (unsuccessfully) to cover people ID's.
Exactly. It's not a documentary.
Maybe they changed it, because I watched it illegally through a day 1 rip from Netflix and it absolutely said "this is a true story" on every episode.
Haha, I called it. I knew she was trying to get in on the payday.
Piers got it wrong. It doesn't say its a true story at the start of every episode, it does at the start of the first episode but not every episode.
It still says it
Netflix better have liability insurance
I believe it is true. I would hate for this liar to walk away with a bunch of money after lying on international tv!
Maybe Netflix has all the evidence and just holding it.
It is a true story of Donny and Martha not Richard and Fiona.
Fiona mentioned how much money Netflix and Richard Gadd have made so far on the series, maybe the motivation for coming forward. I think she is dangerous actually. I don't want to see her harm anyone (or herself) At the end of the day, she is a very damaged human.
You should check the article from the “National Post” about a Daily Mail writer (Neil Sears) who was targeted by Fiona. This woman is INSANE! People should stop giving her attention
my thoughts exactly
Imarn Ayton was so over-the-top rude on that show!
Omg she was borderline tipping me over the edge just trying to listen😂 at one point I was just yelling somebody mute her!at the tv😂
She must never be allowed a public voice unless there’s a mute microphone switch.
It's a shame 'cos when she was calm she made some valid points that I agreed with. I speculate she was on some kinda medication.
I read a post that piers stated that he won't have Imarn on the show again on "x"
ooh she is unwatchable
The more that comes out about this woman, the more I believe Gadd 100%. She's the type of stalker who could turn violent
Wasn’t the time to negotiate her appearance fee was BEFORE doing said appearance? Fiona is so much worse than how she was depicted on the show. I don’t have an ounce of empathy for Fiona but I did for Martha!
Piers Morgan has publicly stated (responding to one viewer's complaint) that he won't have Imarn Ayton back on the show.. 👏
Piers said: _"My apologies. Her behaviour was dreadful, and incredibly disrespectful to the other guests. No idea what she thought she was playing at, but she ruined the debate and won’t be invited back."_
She was VILE.
@@NineNineOne She truly was! 🤦🏻♀️
She always is. Don't know why she is given any airtime?
For such a smart attorney, why would she not have negotiated terms BEFORE the interview.!?
Neither her nor Piers thought the interview would explode like it did.
Fiona isnt after money from Piers, per se, she is *_stalking_* Piers !! 👀‼️
She started stalking him before she even went on. She knew his exact age, she knew his catalogue of work, she knew of a recent case where Piers was "persecuted"...
This is all going to look sooo clear in hindsight, as this whole thing progresses - which it absolutely will!
It follows Fiona's formula...
Some nice man , well out of her league, feels sorry for her, and shows her the slightest kindness...
..as soon as the kindness wears off, and the man does not follow through by sweeping her off her feet, then she feels sleighted, and, now furious, she takes out her revenge on him!
_Obsessively!_
→ "How dare he do this to me!!😡"
This is why Piers was so concerned about Netflix having done Fiona wrong - because, that's precisely what Fiona would have been accusing Piers of, behind the scenes... And he was sh¡††¡ing himself... as she would have been threateneing law suits , just like she did to Netflix . . . 💀
Fiona talking about how he didn't spend time with her and only posed for publicity pictures.
Um, yeah.
It's his job. It wasn't a date.
At least, Piers has better security than Gadd had.
The guy she stalked should sue her first.
The human rights act in the UK prevents most criminal records being released unless its for like specific crimes associated with a job interview or whatever.
It clearly states at the end of each episode that it is not 100% true and that it been embellished for dramatic effect. Bet Netflix is loving the free publicity!!!!
And it clearly stated "this is a true story" at the beginning of every episode (at least it did). It is also true that far fewer people read the credits at the end. So it comes down to what was Netfiix's intention: to give the impression that it was a true story or not.
@roelofvuurboom5939 yes, totally agree - i think they were complicit as the auto play next episode switched before the end credit title came up.
And no one saw that coming lol
This lady is off her rocker lolllllll!
NOT LOL! It's gettin scary.
I completely believe Fiona did everything she has been accused of doing, including being convicted. She started with a double barrel surname, dropped it to a single, got convicted for stalking and then changed to the other surname
So a lawyer who specialises in employment law essentially hasn’t read her contract.
If there was no contract, she is owed nothing.
She saw 11 Million views and thought it translates to $11 Mill.. She's really unwell
Her grandiose tendencies are clearly just as they were illustrated in the show
Well if she was really stalking him she shouldn’t be rewarded money for committing crimes. Victims have a right to tell their story.
Peirce was way more gentle with her...than i have ever seen him be.
If the genders were reversed, y'all would immediately would find the stalker guilty. Y'all would not be speculating whether the victim is telling the truth. Yet people wonder why male victims don't come forward.
I don't see anyone thinking she is not guilty.
Women aren't believed either.
Just stop with the whatabout-isms already my man. Everyone thinks she's guilty and unhinged. "Y'all" does not apply here.
If the accuser was female I would definitely be questioning if she’s telling the truth or not. Women lie all the time about crimes allegedly perpetrated against them. And they’re doing it even more lately since we started valorising victimhood.
Don't speak for me!!!
It doesn't surprise me that she is now beginning to stalk Piers. People had predicted this. 🤡🤡
Its a lot harder to get criminal records for other people without permission from the individual. Fiona would have to give permission or you have to apply to the court for the record to be disclosed. This can take time for a judge to approve the request. The process to see criminal records is very different from the US process.
Thank you 🙏🏻 I did wonder how it works in Scotland 🏴🐨🐨🦘
In the US it’s very easy to access criminal records. It’s public information and is readily handed over.
I think Richard is traumatized and has healed himself and does not want to expose himself anymore than he has to. I don’t see how hard that is to understand, especially if you’ve ever been a survivor of the things he went through.
“Based on a true story”, has never meant the fictionalised content being presented is a 100% factual. We’re in a really poor state of mind as a society that we no longer understand this and have a lack of critical thinking and assessment. As for Richard, everyone needs to leave him alone, his work has done more for the focus on trauma, especially for men, than anyone or any charity has done in decades of preaching. This man deserves to have some level of privacy in the present. It’s beyond ridiculous that anyone can say Fiona deserves sympathy in comparison to Richard and everyone is playing into her sociopathic bs.
You don’t understand. It’s not based on a true story. Netflix and the writer said that it is a true story
@@Giantfanmisery so many people in these comments are failing to understand this important distinction
I'm with you, saying something is a true story isn't new in media. The attention economy of the Internet has to squeeze every last drop of dignity from humanity.
This society is twisted. We reward evil and punish the good
The exact wording at the beginning of the first episode is “this is a true story” which is very different from “based on a true story”. Netflix should have known better than to use that choice of words.
What Piers did was wrong. He shouldn't have allowed a criminal to go on his channel and keep harassing her victims by insulting them and minimising what she did to them.
I agree with you, it was her way of getting at her victim once again.
If I’d been stalked by Fiona before I wouldn’t go on Piers after Fiona Harvey because I’d be afraid she’d start stalking me again. She’s clearly not afraid of stalking or harassing high profile people.
Exactly my thought
When I was watching the show I thought if this woman is still alive she will come back with a vengeance! Here we are. You can’t acknowledge a stalker no matter how long it’s been. I’m scared for him.
She changed her name. She stalked a lawyer called Laura Way under her previous name, Fiona Muir
Okay so he’s a skilled actor…. She’s supposedly a skilled lawyer. Doesn’t this mean she should have the skills ?
40 thousand plus emails over the course of time even if it’s just months is totally Believable, I had a stalker call me 68 times in 17 minutes and that included almost 10 minutes of voice messages
That's terrifying. How were you able to break free? Did you move?
Yep
@@SoCalG310 don’t engage at all and had police pay him a visit. That only stopped him for a week but eventually he moved on. I had to transfer my work territory etc. but biggest thing is not to engage remove your voice from vm, don’t respond no matter what. Even though you want to tell them off that interaction will reignite their obsession.
@@LenoxJustifierofInnocence Oh wow. That's excellent advice. Megyn Kelly said the same. I had a semi-stalker I met at a coffee shop. He showed up at my place -- when I never told him where I lived. I got lucky and I have to hand it to him... he caught himself. He sent me an e-mail saying, "I'm sorry. I was wrong. I won't contact you again." I even saw him on the street, months later. It was obvious we recognized each other, but he walked past and didn't engage.
She’s not playing with a full deck.
A couple of sheep short in the top paddock
Apparently she has 20 or 30 Tiktok accounts... or else ppl are pretending to be her😮😂
Nah he's probably not talking now because he's collecting his ducks in a row to go to court again, if Martha proceeds with the court threat. It is always better to stay silent. He's not going to dig himself a hole by doing what Martha has now done and made a damaging interview that only negatively effects yourself and your case.
Exactly, he knows her! Also he will not come forward with the evidence or any statement because they will be revealing her identify and confirming it’s her.
I don't think its fair to think that she should be protected at all costs. Why, because she is in denial? Then we'd have to excuses ourselves to every murderer, criminal, tirant.... that there was ever made a movie, series or documentary about. It is said in the back credits that some details have been changed to try and hide the identity of both martha and the producer guy. That man was more than honest, and showed less compassion and flowers around his own behavior than he did about 'martha'. He was brutally honest on his flaws and mistakes. But he was harassed, relentlessly. Since when do we silence victims because the perpetrator is not well in the head. No perpetrator is well in the head, but she is obviously not stupid. On top of that, she is thrusting herself to the limelight because she revels in it. She is sick and dangerous. And applause to richard gadd on how he portrayed the whole thing. I have been stalked before, and it impacts your life beyond any measure of comprehension, never feeling safe anymore, seeing that person in your street, on the bus, on events, where you know he/she shouldnt be. Just being there staring at you, sometimes even fucking breathing down your neck! And as long as they do not attack you, you are fucked with reporting it to the police. It went so far as to breaking in to my house, because I had had a date, because he felt he had a right to me. Should I shut up about it, because he revels in his own self pity. And that guy was never even convicted, because I was too scared to take further steps, not trying to poke the bear too much. It only stopped when he found another girl, which turned into a relationship for him.
On her FB page there are SO many misspelling of words...This is an educated lawyer?
Yes, but if she is bipolar that would make sense.
Ye but "not top of the year or anything"
Yes we want to see evidence of past criminal record. But I also want to see her law degree verified
The same poorly written messages were shown on the Netflix series, with misspellings and bad grammar. I still can’t believe how accurately they portrayed her on the show.
@@tamlynn786 What I want to know is... does this woman have a THERAPIST?!
Nobody asked her to be on the show, she was the one reaching out to Pierce and she even explained why she chose him. She wanted to come out. Now that she wants all this money it actually proofs how sick she is. Now I believe every word of the documentary, even the part when she does time. Someone this problematic sure must have seen the inside of a police station at some point in life… 😅
Do you think that maybe Fiona has a sealed record with a conditional discharge? Do they do that in Scotland? Makes me wonder😮
It seems to me that once the film aired, and so many people started talking about it, she started thinking she could make some big money. So, she came out as the real Martha. I don't see, then, how she has any case at all. After all, no one would have ever known it was her if she hadn't outed herself.
I can’t really say I blame her on that though. If it’s a story about me I’d want to get paid too.
I'm going out on a limb here., without sugar coating how I feel. I would say that she is a convicted stalker. She, and she alone can only request her criminal record in the UK. She backtracked on a lot of issues. In my humble opinion she is a delusional narcissist allegedly.
She is VERY sick and Dangerous IMOP
She was arrested. Netflix has lawyers. They didn’t just agree to put this out there without proof
How do you know she was arrested?
That’s my point. I don’t. Netflix does. I highly doubt their legal team would allow this to go out without seeing all of the proof, which Gadd has. I guarantee they made him back up his claims before this was produced
Piers did make £, she should have negotiated better, given she’s a lawyer.
Exactly! Great comment
How can she sue, she has confirmed it was her!
She outted herself, no one else. She wants the attention.
Yup. She sure did. 😮👍🤪👍😬👍
Legally, she absolutely did.
😂😂😂😂😂
Well she's saying it's clearly based on her, but it's defamatory as it isn't true. I think it's likely to be mostly true tbh.
@harrydavey9884 I've had a stalker it's not fun!
@@Kellyjellycones78 okay, I'm not saying I believe her. You asked "how can she sue" I'm explaining how. She's saying it's based on her, but the allegations are false and defamatory.
If we knew eachother personally and I made a TV show based on you saying you murdered my family, and made the character very obviously you to where the public could find out it was based on you. Then you came out and said "this is clearly based on myself" do you think that would prevent you from suing for defamation?
We all know shows BASED on true stories ARENT exactly that truthful and a version of the truth.. I havent seen the show but watched the Fiona interview and she can’t tell the truth if her life depends on it.. She lied throughout the entire interview denying doing things and THEN SAYING ‘OH, YES, I DID SEND A LETTER’.. after saying she didn’t know the dude, where he lived etc.. and then sent a letter.. SHES definitely a stalker and really weird..
It’s not based. I’ve explained this to other people in this comment section but Netflix and the writer claim it IS a true story
@@GiantfanmiseryIt also has a disclaimer!
@@Giantfanmisery So her name really is Martha? Then it couldn't be Fiona.
@@Giantfanmiseryevery episode at the end has a disclaimer. It’s not a docuseries
Why didn’t Netflix just say ‘based on a true story’? Why say it’s a true story in bold at the beginning and then put a disclaimer at the end in the credits that no one watches?
my girlfriend thinks I’m a stalker, well she’s not exactly my girlfriend yet.😂
Uh oh!
😅😅😅
😂😂😂👍
Brilliant
😂😂🤣👏
She is completely unhinged! She needs to be arrested for stalking!
There is another person saying that Fiona Muir ( changed name to Harvey) was stalking her as well.
Did you guys not hear about Fiona's nephew posting about her? He said that she changed her name after all of this happened. Her last name used to ve "Muir" Has nobody looked that name up?
Also, in the interview, when she's watching Martha get sentenced. When the judge tells her how ling she will serve Martha looks up and even starts to pick up her finger to interrupt but then stops. Looking up many times is trying to think, recall, count, ect.
This woman is so full of wrap I cannot believe you guts feel sorry for her. Sheknows her record is clean bc all if this happened under her other name. Follow the clues.
I wish Morgan would have let her talk at that point.
I thought that guy who said he was her nephew had been debunked?
@@villanelle8888 He was but he doesnt even matter. Fiona said herself during the interview with Piers that her previous name was Muir.
@@KimberlyFaith It's only him that said she was charged and served time though.
@@villanelle8888 Yeah as far as I know there is no proof she has served time as of yet. Although if you google Fiona Muir you can read about the Wray stalking incident. I'm guessing if she does indeed have a record it would be under that name. I'm sure all of the truth will come out eventually... it usually does.
Aside from this....His parents had their issues as well. It must have been very difficult for his mother living with his father clearly suffering from PTSD blowing up all the time. There must have been alot of love, understanding and patience on her behalf.
How did you sit through that interview! The woman who wouldn’t let anyone speak had me yelling at my iPad!
I think you're missing the point. Her actions speak very loud, and it's clear she's already manipulated public opinion enough to see her as a victim.
I think this is just the start and it will blow up big and she's ready for it. She did the interview with Piers because she had a narrative to sell, and because she wants to take revenge on Gadd for exposing her, and now she's after Piers because she realized he didn't buy her story and made her reveal too much, so she feels tricked. If she asks to be paid a lot for the interview, she thinks, it will help her clear her name and control the narrative.
Just look at how many sniding remarks she had about Gadd, and now Piers. She wants to present them as unimportant and incompetent, to weaken the impact of what they say.
She has already sent Piers some messages, he says. Will she send more from her multiple phones and email accounts? It wouldn't surprise me at all.
People are saying she's changed her name. Is it possible it's because she has a record of some sort?
I know a lot of people want to see a poor, innocent woman in her who hasn't been proven guilty of anything, and that's fair. I'm gonna say you're dealing with another Amber Heard, Meghan Markle, Elizabeth Holmes, and you should already know what this means. Don't turn a blind eye to the red flags, this woman is all red flags.
BUT isn’t she a high profile lawyer after all? 😂. She would know these legal negotiations.
I wonder if something terrible happened to her during her childhood or if she’s just wired this way
She outed herself on social media… why is she a victim?
Normally stalkers aren’t taken seriously by police til someone is harmed or worse ☠️
But Fiona changed her name that’s why people can’t find her stalking history.
I’d bet Netflix put some kind of disclosure that says events were exaggerated, fictionalized, or changed somewhere in the credits to cover bases legally.
When this would be a „true story“ the name of Martha would have been Fiona. True story doesn’t mean that every detail has to be true.
She has no chance in court. Because she is saying that this is not her AND this is her at the same time.
The “black style” comment was weird and cringe and unnecessary.
Her nephew says she did 4 months under a different last name.
It was a joke, he isn't her nephew.
Debunked
Ffs his name is Piers, not Pearce.
She's like that on every show. Piers always has her on his show. She was on GB news really rude and ended up walking off and will never be invited back.
I never watch anything she is on, but because Andy was on the panel, I put up with her, abusing my ears.
I swit h channels when she is on, I cannot bear the woman
she claims she is the real martha but at the same time claims she didnt do the things that "martha"did ...so how is she the real martha ? she says she is but then she isnt .its obvious shes lying and a sick individual.
NO ONE said, that the movie is about Fiona. SHE DID.
For obvious reasons. 💲💲💲
He couldn’t answer your question directly due to legal reasons. If he answered a clear yes she would build more of a case. He then redirected and said there were nice conversations. He is smart ✅
Ray Charles could see this coming…
Obviously she has major issues and is now fixated on Piers. I hope Piers has some degrees of separation with her.
Its a lot harder to get records such as this in Scotland and the UK in general.
Also she could have privatised her accounts to protect her identity. Even after all of this time, she hasn't removed any of her posts. She is an adult woman. Treat her like one.
Great point! Also, she said she sent him a letter after the play wishing him well. Well wish letter instead of a cease and desist. So does she want the fame?
@@lacysnake I'm not sure if fame is what she wants. She definitely wants attention though. As much as she can get.
SHE asked to be on ^ SHE set it up.
Richard Gadd never vilified her. He told his experience and shared his own doubts about her, he tried to understand “Martha” but couldn’t. I interpreted the last scene as a cathartic moment where he wished she had confessed but clearly she never did as she’s still denying it. Whether she wars convicted or not it doesn’t matter to me. I don’t see any of them as villains. Gad was talented enough to tell the story so he was rewarded, she deserves nothing because she didn’t produce anything. Does Steven Spielberg owe the surviving jews of the holocaust for telling their story?
Her nephew has come forward saying she was convicted
All of this confirms Richard Gadd's experience. Now... the audience is observing the behavior HE observed... in REAL time and in REAL life. 🤯
That's not flirting gentlemen, that's British humour. And Loraine is a lovely lady who is very loving, which is why Piers is very kind to her too.
Found this info, "This is more difficult to fact-check in the UK than it is in the US. In the UK, criminal records are publicly available and the criminal records office has records of every arrest, charge, caution, and conviction. However, the Human Rights Act states that criminal records are not publicly viewable unless released by the courts. The Freedom of Information Act allows individuals to request information about the criminal justice system from public authorities, including prisons and police forces, but the information may be exempt."
Can she really sue after she did the interview?
I’m surprised that you didn’t mention her PR “event” At a nightclub in Coventry!! But, as of a few hours ago, apparently it’s been called off because of a negative backlash. Their promotion stated that she would be there to “…sign autographs, selfies and…” I can’t bring myself to type the rest of the advert. But I’m very glad that it’s been cancelled because it was glorifying her behaviour in giving her another platform to speak out and she’s still a vulnerable woman.
if she is this big time lawyer like she says that she is than she should have made a better deal lol
Lewis or Louis, whatever his name is, is out of his mind! No one has ruined Fiona’s life- BUT Fiona. I believe with all the name changes- that she could have been reprimanded within a court setting, at some point in her life. I believe she crossed a line and RGadd admitted his behavior at times was unbecoming. I can’t listen to this man talk utter nonsense defending a woman who clearly doesn’t understand boundaries! Wait until he gets a taste of crazy in life- why doesn’t he take Fiona out for a lunch date?
Plus, it gives the stink of victim blaming. This sets a precedent for victims to keep quiet about their own story for fear of being sued.
Fargo show says "This is a true story" on each episode lol
Haha, this is the video I've been waiting for. Piers is going to regret giving her his number...or his producers number.