It's sad because Cars 3 isn't so bad, Cars 3 actually feels like the real sequel to Cars 1, but the damaged caused by Cars 2 was irreparable so Cars 3 wasn't such a major success. I was so shocked when Cars 3 was a normal movie again because I had been so burned from Cars 2. 8:00 Yep you mentioned it, exactly my thoughts.
@@hx20games77 Right. That's probably the reason why Lightning had the flame shapes in his paints (the element kept from the World Grand Prix design) and still had actual headlights and even Jeff Gorvette made an appearence in the third movie. So they don't ignore the second movie completely but don't specifically remember it either. But I still like Cars 2 and I can consider it canon. The lemon concept was brilliant and it was a good story about Lightning and Mater through their ups and downs.
@@Movietuff I think cars 2 should've just cut the spy stuff completely, focus on the races with lightning and maters relationship as a side plot affecting lightnings ability to race and both of them needing to realize and change for the better, cars 2 had a few nice concepts but the whole spy thriller thing just wasn't a good idea, not to mention making the world feel human rather than controlled by vehicles (notice how a lot of stuff are human like? like actual food for example). Cars 3 just handles the idea of mcqueen getting old fairly well imo, I really like how it pretty much "repeats history" in the way that mcqueen basically goes through the same troubles Hudson did.
True, but in 2015 when they released Inside Out I thought Pixar was finally back but then they immediately released The Good Dinosaur and lost momentum.
@@purple1441 Which is weird because they took a 2016 break and by 2017, Coco released proving they still had it but then Incrediboes 2 disappointed us in 2018 and Toy Story 4 in 2019 to close off the decade for hollow
Hilariously, I think the ONLY thing that actually carried over from Cars 2 to 3 is Doc's death. Even then though, it's only briefly implied in 2 to the point where it might as well have never been acknowledged, while 3 goes all-in on showcasing his legacy. So yeah, it is my headcanon that Cars 2 is just a feature-length Mater's Tall Tales
While I understand fully the hate for this movie and why people consider this the worst Pixar film. But maybe it’s nostalgia but I always loved this movie. I was 7-8 when this movie came out and I was hyped. Seeing my favorite characters back on a globetrotting adventure was amazing. Seeing the intense action between Mater and the spies, and especially Lightning racing against the best racers around the world was a spectacular to watch. And Lightning and Mater’s relationship was and still so emotional to me. I get it, this movie doesn’t make sense and then with Cars 3 after makes this look like a weird spinoff, but I’ll always love this movie. Definitely a good video though, keep up the great work.
Same here, not nostalgia, now I dislike it, but as a kid I just loved it. I guess this is just made to appeal to children, like Trolls and Boss Baby. Bad movies, but enjoyable for kids. And my opinion on Cars 1 is influenced by nostalgia and really like the first movie, but I dislike 2 and 3 (probably again because I was a kid)
you know what would make cars 2 better? is if the story would be about lighting mcqueen going on tour so much that it gets in the way of his friends, the story could just be about that rather than a stupid spy movie that fails as a sequal.
Cars 2 should've continued Mcqueen's racing life, and show us him winning his first piston cup. And personally the third act of Cars 3 really didn't make sense for me. I always think it would've been better for Mcqueen to either lose or win against Jackson Storm to make it look more "realistic" in rules of racing or story wise.
Cars 2 was always my favorite of the three as a kid because I *didn't* like Lightning McQueen or the racing aspects of the first or third. This, paired with being an enjoyer of spy movies and mindless action, caused me to like Cars 2 the best despite it making ZERO sense in the context of the other two.
For Me, Cars 2 Deserved Better and it was One of My Guilty Pleasures. I Love The Well Developed Characters, Catchy Songs and Great Music! Pixar Can Make Good Sequels!
The whole bit about 'lemon' cars and Otis getting trashed as a joke on the first scene and james bond villain style disabled mafia family all rubbed me the wrong way. They introduced eugenics in their universe in the worse way possible. Like, if 'lemon' is a slur, and it sounds like it (in universe, i know in real life it just describes hazardous cars that gets discontinued for safety reason), then it's kinda bad that the protagonist keeps using that word without ever learning to stop. The iffy part didn't start here, in the first movie Lightning was doing false *medical* advertisement for a rust treatment oil but it was at least acknowledged to be _bad,_ since he looked so uncomfortable after seeing cars rotting, having their whole jaw fall off. As a kid I played the game that came from this and never watched the film, so I was very surprised when I saw the film almost a year ago. Like, what. Is this ableism??? Am I reading too much into it? Who made this? Who put this in a vcildren's cartoon😭🤮?!
honestly i've never really gotten into the cars 2 hate, i argue that cars as a franchise on its foundation was already pretty underdeveloped out of necessity and so turning the second film into a spy thriller would be just as insane as the premise of the world existing. my only gripe i would say is that for the plot to continue, characters have to be lobotomized in order to believe matter is a really competent spy just really deep in character. there was probably a way they could have kept him in the story without lowering the intelligence of spies of all people. at the end of all this however i end up laughing at the film for existing more than i get annoyed at it for that one gripe i have
Cars 2 felt like a movie within a movie to me, like it wasn't real, but just a film that would be made in the Cars universe that cars would watch, that Mater and McQueen just starred in.
My issue with Cars 2 was that the cars all felt "too human". They ate food (instead of just needing oil and gas), used their tires as hands (see also the handshake Lightning and Mater have), and they had facilities like bathrooms. It ruined my willing suspense of disbelief. It's like they had an idea for a spy movie but felt like they needed the Cars brand to make it.
@@Mulletman25 yeah vbut the difference between that and this one was that the bathroom shot was just to make fun of females but this movie was having too many real world human activcy.
Bro cars 3 is literally better, Cars 3 had good plot, good characters, and better comedy than Cars 2. Cars 3 is more realistic too. The only thing that's good in Cars 2 is the action (sorry for my bad english)
something that bothers me even when i was child regarding this movie is the fact that McQueen went to the outside lane during the first race in tokyo, sorry but lightning lost the race was totally his fault, he has no right to be angry with mater Because if he is aware that switching to the outside lane could cost him the victory, why does he do it then? He is no longer a rookie, he is in the world grand prix! if he is already a professional racer he should have simply ignored mater and left francesco bernoulli in his place from the start, but of course he didn't do that because..........I don't know, I guess John Lasseter didn't come up with a better idea for McQueen to get mad at Mater
@@ghidorahzetto283 well, a jerk for yellin at my best friend and feeling embarrassed for his/her behavior, even though I chose him/her myself…. Okay, Lightning is just my description, i can also be a jerk sometimes and snap at others (most recently for no reason),which is why his anger looks a bit justified to me. And I’m glad he always feels regretful for being rude to Doc, Mater or Cruz
To me this movie is more mediocre than straight up horrible, but I still wonder how it got away with a G rating, there’s a lot of death and a torture scene!
It’s probably because of this film that most animated films are rated PG and some animated films I’ve seen don’t have that much questionable subject matter to warrant a PG and could just be rated G and nothing would change. I’m even starting to wonder if there’s any point to having the G rating anymore and maybe the MPAA should just retire the rating altogether.
Because the characters are cars, so the violence is less "gory" (as in with human blood and all). And it's probably because PIXAR is one of those few animation companies that can get away with a G rating in their movies (Cars 3 and Toy Story 4 are quite recent films that managed to get a G rating during an age where PG is more common and marketable).
I would say cars 2 should have been just a prequal and not a sequel. For me personally I like cars 2 when I was a kid and still probably now. I think they just wanted to make a movie about the relief character and have it be a spy movie. I haven't watch the new cars but all I know is that its good.
Cars 2 is a genuine good movie in my opinion. Maybe it doesnt fit as a sequel to 'Cars' but the story is good. If they had called it like 'Cars undercover' or something and not as a sequel to the first movie but rather a side story i think it wouldn't have gotten so much hate cause I still enjoy this movie and I always did. I think it might even be better than 'Cars' but I also understand if you dont agree on that. Cars 2 just gets too nmuch hate for a good movie I mean its definetely better than some other sequels lik 'Cloudy with a chance of meatballs 2'.
2:13 They thought he was a spy because he had knowledge about old Volkswagens that literally anybody interested in classic cars would know and that's just in our world, I would think that would be even better known in the cars world. The spies should have actually gone for something complicated.
I think Cars 2 is overall mediocre. While the action is good and there were a COUPLE funny jokes, but it’s still not as good as the first and third movies. At least Cars 3 was an improvement over this one. But hey, I don’t want to bash on this movie too much because it IS a Pixar film after all. And I still have a lot of respect for Pixar whether for the better or worse.
Just because it's a horrible sequel doesn't mean it's a bad movie. I mean, you could say the same for every Ice Age Sequel and Thor Ragnarok. They aren't getting demonized like this one is.
I noticed how hated this movie was, it isn't that bad, the plot is good and I like the chararcters, people hate it because it went from racing to spy thriller then racing, theres more negativity then positivity.
Dreamworks is kinda like Valve of the animation industry, they make sequels that are far better than the original in the majority, Sam Raimi did the same thing with spider-man 2.
People always say that it was a bad movie that ruined the Cars franchise, but the biggest crime is this is somehow in the catalogue of Pixar, and had none of that charm, heart, charisma and good messages that other movies by the studio had. I just don’t know why nobody ever says that because the signs are so clear that this is so out of sync to what Pixar has done before and even after.
For me, it will always be Monsters University with tiresome clichés from every school movie and series, and rejected characters from The Muppets and Sesame Street.
Why do you hate Monsters University? I thought Monsters University did a terrific job at crafting an origin story for the friendship of Mike Wazowski and James P. Sullivan when they started out as foes, like Woody and Buzz Lightyear were in the original Toy Story film.
While I don't think it's the worst Pixar movie. Brave and the Good Dinosaur take that spot. Cars 2 stands out for being the first bad Pixar film. Which makes it seem worse in the eyes of the public, but I can at least watch parts of the movie and enjoy them. More than I can say about Brave and the Good Dinosaur that's for sure.
I didn’t like Cars 2, not only the fact I despise spy movies, even this movie had too many spy cliches as the main reason why I hate them, but it’s because of how this movie is too violent and out of place for a G-rated movie, and the heroes are causing a lot more death and destruction than the villains. Granted, the characters they killed are only bad guys and they probably get what they deserved, but the problem is they’ve only killed two agents, the racers that got shot by an EMP survived that, and when they did capture the heroes, they only follow the cliched spy villain archetype by putting them in easily escapable death traps, which breaks the suspension of disbelief. And if the heroes are only defending themselves, they could’ve just stun them with tasers or something instead of slaughtering them, like Kratos. I know there are people who like this film for a different reason, mostly because of nostalgia, and that’s okay, but as a kid watching it, I was like confused by the storyline and characters, and every time I’ve been viewing so many cliches like this, I’m getting tired of it.
When I was little, I was obsessed with both Toy Story and Cars. I had this huge collection of Lightning McQueen, Mater, and the rest of the characters. I still have them in my room. When the teaser trailer for Cars 2 dropped, my parents showed me the trailer and I was super excited for the sequel. Once the movie came out, I loved it. At first, I thought Cars 2 did successfull in the box office. Little did I know, this movie failed, which I can see why. The story should've focused on McQueen's story. Its his franchise. In my opinion, Cars 1's animation is better than the other Cars movies due to how shiny it is. Sure Cars 2 & 3 have better improvement with lighting but Cars 1 looked really beautiful. Now that I'm turning 19 in December, I think Cars 2 was an okay movie. However, Cars 1 & 3 is much better.
If I’m honest, focusing on Cars 3 on a side-note, I don’t mind the whole “passing the torch” thing to Cruz Ramirez but the fact that the trailers made it so focused on Lightning McQueen and not on Cruz Ramirez was just, to b who eat, insulting. It’s not the biggest problem but there are other ways of making this work and maybe adding in a fourth Cars movie and that’s to wait until it happens. For example, McQueen heard about Cruz saying that she wanted to be a racer forever because of him. McQueen is, as usual, shocked by this like in the movie and wanted to make it up to her. He makes a deal with Cruz saying that if he wins against Storm and wins another Piston Cup (I’m not sure how the time would of year it would go), he, Smoky, and the other legends would then train her to be, either a fellow teammate for McQueen’s organization, let Tex assist them in making her the next Dinoco driver like in the end. All of that would be in the next movie but that’s just me. What do you think? Is this a good idea or would you prefer what we got in the Final Cut or in the deleted scenes for the final race? Like I said, I don’t mind what we got but I felt like it could’ve been done better. As for Cars 2, this was the start of the downfall of Pixar overall whereas the previous movie, Toy Story 3, was the perfect ending for the franchise and the end of the Golden Age of Pixar (1995-2010). This movie should not have existed.
I mean, You’re not wrong. Cars 2 doesn’t work as a sequel, but if you actually separate it from Cars 1, and 3, it’s actually not bad, I actually do like this movie, a lot. I liked everything about the movie. From the characters, to the story, to the animation, to the main character, to the soundtrack, etc. This movie would definitely work better as a spinoff. And other movies have done this before. Like Puss in Boots the last wish for example. I’m not saying it’s the best Pixar movie, but I think it definitely is one of the best in my humble opinion. And besides, Pixar definitely has had worse movies then Cars 2. like Toy Story 4, The Good Dinosaur, Lightyear, and the worst Pixar movie ever made, Turning Red.
Even if I did separate it from the other two movies, it is still bad because of the idiotic plot with so many holes and contrivances and the stupid idiotic characters.
@@captainmarvelwilson508 That’s valid. If you hate the movie, then that’s perfectly fine. I’m just giving my thoughts and opinions on this subject. After all, we all have different opinions on the same movie.
As a kid watching this movie when it came out, I didn't even notice any of the issues with how out of character this sequel was to the franchise and just took it as fun entertainment. But I get your point and I'm glad the sufferable goofy hijinks outwits everything trend sorta died out
Cars 2 is a movie for KIDS only. End of story. Nothing logical is in it, so imo it's not worth waisting your time criticizing it. I think that makes alot of sense.
I got the DVD after I saw the film in theaters, very time I tried to put the DVD in the DVD player, I was always hesitant despite I thought at the time the movie was good. I guess my body was ahead of time
I haven't watched this movie...one reason because a whole movie featuring Mater...nuff said. However, I would probably watch Cars 2 and love it over that bizarre Good Dinosaur movie. *shudders*
All pixar sequels(except for toy story) focus on another character making him their protagonist. In finding Nemo marlin was the main character, but in finding dory dory was the main. In the incredibles mr incredible was the main character and in the sequel, elastgirl was the protagonist. And lastly, in monsters inc, sullen was the main character but in the prequel( monsters University) they focused on mike, making him the main character
Doing something different in a sequel is completely fine, as long as the directors care about what the original set up and make the different stuff an expansion of the universe. Cars 2 does not do any of that, and just randomly brings in spies to a series that was mostly about racing.
This movie is overheated Mater is my favorite character in the whole franchise he deserved a movie about himself and the psychics aren’t even that bad and I like to change more violent movie and I find it funny the fact that it’s still a G rated movie dark is G rated movie ever made that are toy story three
Though I am not technically a hater of this movie- tho i do see why it is and I do feel that it is not as connected to the first film- NGL the soundtrack lives rent free in my head.
I haven’t watched this video and I’ll probably update my comment when I watch it later but as a cars fan yes Cars 2 sucks as a sequel But if you just watch the movie and kinda ignore the other two it’s a fun movie to watch I wouldn’t say it’s a bad movie it probably has flaws but I do really like this movie lol
I feel like people are forgetting that this is FOR KIDS. It’s a movie that is meant to be dumb fun. Yes we all know how much better this movie could be but what we were given was still good. Why are people hating as if they just don’t like spy thrillers. The characters are fun and I don’t think we necessarily needed another story arc about lighting when we got a good one in the first movie. This movie tackles the fact that everyone sees matter as an idiot very well. Also I find it weird that people think cars 3 should be 2, like what? So after the first one we’re supposed to just skip all the way to him being retired, even that doesn’t make sense cause there is hardly any concept of time in these films.
there is one good defense for cars 2. unlike cars 1 and 3, in this movie the characters being cars actually matters. as in the story wont be the same if they used humans as car drivers instead of anthro cars. a big criticism of the cars movies is exactly that.. the characters being cars is not serving a huge purpose story wise and the movies could easily be about humans that drive cars instead and have basically the same plot.
They should have added more racing less spy thriller because I absolutely loved the racing scenes as it was pretty cool, but the spy thriller thing was wierd and out of place.
Say what you want about Cars 2, I don’t think it’s too bad, especially compared to Toy Story 4! Seriously, Toy Story 4 completely disregards the lessons taught by the first 3 movies, ends in a way that prevents Woody from coming back and overall even makes FoodFight! look like Spirited Away!
You over complicated Miles plan. He found a huge oil reserve at the same time the world was going more alternative fuel. What better way to go back to fossil fuels than to make alternative fuels look bad?
I agree with this whole video. the only thing i disagree about is about they should have kept adding new characters. I literally hated cars 2 its the worst kids movie imo. I'm so happy that cars 3 ditches everything that happened in cars 2. Bc if those cars 2 characters that were the (most unlikable characters I've ever watched). It would just divide the cars franchise even more.
13:37 Can you maybe explain what a good Cars 2 sequel could have looked like, because from your video it appears you have no idea what you are talking about and rather just talking crap
Pixar really shit the bed with this movie. It's illogical in a bad way. Even a movie as amazingly bad as Sharknado or cartoons as insane as Roadrunner cartoons felt more logical than Cars 2. I can accept illogical stuff in a fictional work. But, the illogical aspects of a fictional work at least have to be funny (ex: Sharknado movies allow sharks to breathe outside of water and be carried by tornadoes so they can attack people, Roadrunner cartoons are meant to be funny and fantastical). They're self-aware about their absurdity, hence where the cheap laughs come in. They have some basis in reality, too. Sharks can and have landed in neighborhood lawns and streets after a really bad hurricane. Sure, they're dead and dried out, but the idea of sharks being carried out of the ocean by a dangerous cyclone isn't out of the realm of possibility. Likewise, predator and prey relationships do exist in Nature, and coyotes do eat birds. Birds like the peregrine falcon can move at racecar-like speeds, and birds like the magpie are very smart. Thus, a coyote who tries endlessly to catch a super-fast and crafty bird is believable. Sharknado and Roadrunner cartoons are just an exaggerated version of real life and Nature, in other words. There're a lot of laughs that can come from looking at cars with big, googly windshield eyes. That's partly why folks enjoyed Cars 1. The vehicles were anthropomorphic, but not too much. They were just minivans, semi trucks, tow trucks, sports cars, etc that could talk and emote. That's it. -They race. -They consume gasoline, not food -They use car washes to stay clean -They stay in giant traffic cones and gas stations for shelter -Because the front bumpers and headlights of cars somewhat resemble animal-like faces and a car's tires resemble the legs of a quadrupedal animal, you can bring a car to life pretty easily. It helps that cars like a Ford Mustang or a Chevy Corvette have more personality and charisma than other consumer products like a computer or a toaster. A world of cars built by cars. There's a basis in reality for this setup because cars do in fact need to go car washes to stay clean and need gasoline to stay in working condition. Just perfect! But, in Cars 2, we see: -Vehicles eating wasabi and tacos instead of gasoline -Vehicles drinking cocktails and beer instead of gasoline -No more giant traffic cones. Now only buildings that could only have been constructed for human use -The bathrooms, which really should've been car washes like in Cars 1, are now man-made bathrooms with bathroom stalls and sinks that are presumably designed for human use. -The bathroom stalls would have to be the size of a parking lot to fit multiple vehicles that are >2,000 lbs in weight and >12 feet in length, yet they have sinks that would only work for human hands. -We even see a lavatory truck right outside of an airplane, which implies that vehicles can, uhh, defecate....? -We see airplanes that are large enough only to fit cars and trucks that are probably about 1-5 tons in weight. So, if you're a 30+ ton semi truck or a 500+ ton train, then you can't travel to see the rest of the world. Sucks to be you. They aren't even self-aware about the absurdity or anything. Even if they had been self-aware, there's no humor behind a man-made setting without humans and only consumer products because they have no basis in reality. The illogical aspects of Cars 2 hurt the Cars series overall by making the viewer conjure up all sorts of vile, disgusting images about how these Cars' biology would work. Just look at all the creepy-ass videos online that try to explain how the Cars' bodies work.
This is why I dont really feel the nostalgic about this movie.. the only I feel nostalgic is cars 1 and 3.. this movie is just so random to me with all the spies and sh**
@@maxpeer5370 false, I did not like my own comment. The world is bigger than that; just because no one else commented and mine had a like doesn't mean I was the one who liked it. I get that me taking the time to say this much makes it seem more that I did, I care to defend from hasty accusers.
Ehhhhhh sequel role aside, I genuinely enjoy Cars 2; it’s fun, it’s interesting, complex, rewatchable… plus I kinda find the original kinda bland in comparison of Cars 2. As a kid I loved the chase scenes, different locations/scenery, the confrontations, and the action. Imagine parents making a kid name John, then another one comes alone named John 2, he’s part of the family but is his own person. Yeah and that’s my two cents! (don’t hate me)
We have to accept that Cars 2 is neither good nor perfect, it has many errors, it is far from being the best and for some reason the animation critics classify it as one of the worst animated films of the last decade, shit.
Never watched Cars 2. 4:26 we're not Even gonna address that the cars are getting on a fuckin' plane?! I know that's not what the video is about but as someone who's only seen this movie in clips sporadically it really caught me off guard lol
It's sad because Cars 3 isn't so bad, Cars 3 actually feels like the real sequel to Cars 1, but the damaged caused by Cars 2 was irreparable so Cars 3 wasn't such a major success. I was so shocked when Cars 3 was a normal movie again because I had been so burned from Cars 2. 8:00 Yep you mentioned it, exactly my thoughts.
IDK for me atleast i feel like they want u to make your own timeline like start with Cars then choose what comes next etheir 2 or 3
@@hx20games77 Right. That's probably the reason why Lightning had the flame shapes in his paints (the element kept from the World Grand Prix design) and still had actual headlights and even Jeff Gorvette made an appearence in the third movie. So they don't ignore the second movie completely but don't specifically remember it either. But I still like Cars 2 and I can consider it canon. The lemon concept was brilliant and it was a good story about Lightning and Mater through their ups and downs.
@@Movietuff I think cars 2 should've just cut the spy stuff completely, focus on the races with lightning and maters relationship as a side plot affecting lightnings ability to race and both of them needing to realize and change for the better, cars 2 had a few nice concepts but the whole spy thriller thing just wasn't a good idea, not to mention making the world feel human rather than controlled by vehicles (notice how a lot of stuff are human like? like actual food for example). Cars 3 just handles the idea of mcqueen getting old fairly well imo, I really like how it pretty much "repeats history" in the way that mcqueen basically goes through the same troubles Hudson did.
I think the 3rd is the worst
Cars 3 wasn't a success because it was bad. Simple as that.
Pretty weird how Pixar had a nearly perfect film record and then they made Cars 2. Most of the movies after it have been hit or miss
True, but in 2015 when they released Inside Out I thought Pixar was finally back but then they immediately released The Good Dinosaur and lost momentum.
@@purple1441 Agreed. Cars 3, Inside Out and Coco are the only good modern pixar films
@@kenanbroersma709 Tbh I'd add Finding Dory to that list as well. Not really that great but still better than Toy Story 4 and Incredibles 2
@@purple1441 Which is weird because they took a 2016 break and by 2017, Coco released proving they still had it but then Incrediboes 2 disappointed us in 2018 and Toy Story 4 in 2019 to close off the decade for hollow
>Nearly perfect
A Bug's Life is mediocre at best though, and it's one of their earliest movies.
Honestly, the best part of this movie is that you CAN skip this and just watch Cars 1 and 3 by themselves.
Hilariously, I think the ONLY thing that actually carried over from Cars 2 to 3 is Doc's death. Even then though, it's only briefly implied in 2 to the point where it might as well have never been acknowledged, while 3 goes all-in on showcasing his legacy. So yeah, it is my headcanon that Cars 2 is just a feature-length Mater's Tall Tales
😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
Exactly, thats why i dont rlly watch that much lol
While I understand fully the hate for this movie and why people consider this the worst Pixar film. But maybe it’s nostalgia but I always loved this movie. I was 7-8 when this movie came out and I was hyped. Seeing my favorite characters back on a globetrotting adventure was amazing. Seeing the intense action between Mater and the spies, and especially Lightning racing against the best racers around the world was a spectacular to watch. And Lightning and Mater’s relationship was and still so emotional to me. I get it, this movie doesn’t make sense and then with Cars 3 after makes this look like a weird spinoff, but I’ll always love this movie. Definitely a good video though, keep up the great work.
Same man. I really had a Nostalgia for this, though I still like the first film more.
Banger music too, that’s why I liked cars 2
Same
Same here, not nostalgia, now I dislike it, but as a kid I just loved it.
I guess this is just made to appeal to children, like Trolls and Boss Baby. Bad movies, but enjoyable for kids.
And my opinion on Cars 1 is influenced by nostalgia and really like the first movie, but I dislike 2 and 3 (probably again because I was a kid)
Personally even if it’s nostalgia I really enjoyed it but sometimes l feel a little bit ashamed to be the only one who really liked it.
you know what would make cars 2 better? is if the story would be about lighting mcqueen going on tour so much that it gets in the way of his friends, the story could just be about that rather than a stupid spy movie that fails as a sequal.
This film woulda been a banger if it was a Spinoff
Agreed
If that happened then Cars 3 would be Cars 2
Cars 2 should've continued Mcqueen's racing life, and show us him winning his first piston cup. And personally the third act of Cars 3 really didn't make sense for me.
I always think it would've been better for Mcqueen to either lose or win against Jackson Storm to make it look more "realistic" in rules of racing or story wise.
Cars 2 is like the Shrek 3 of the cars franchise: it is honestly terrible and deserves to be ignored by everyone
I love it for how stupid it is
Cars II one of the best disney films ever created
@@ibgh0549Dont make me laugh..💀
Agree!
I font think it's underrated, but I do think it's overhated
As a fan of the Schaffrillas community, I can relate 11/10
Us shiny crab lovers relate
It's not that the idea of the plot of Cars 2 is awful. It's the fact that there were way too many side plots competing for screen time.
Its like if shrek 3 had a baby with spider man 3
Cars 2 was always my favorite of the three as a kid because I *didn't* like Lightning McQueen or the racing aspects of the first or third. This, paired with being an enjoyer of spy movies and mindless action, caused me to like Cars 2 the best despite it making ZERO sense in the context of the other two.
I’ve seen this film only once when it came to theater, and even I knew there was something off.
This movie broke Pixar's streak
naw it upgraded it
true
For Me, Cars 2 Deserved Better and it was One of My Guilty Pleasures.
I Love The Well Developed Characters, Catchy Songs and Great Music!
Pixar Can Make Good Sequels!
same
Agreed.
Agreed
Well Developed characters?
The whole bit about 'lemon' cars and Otis getting trashed as a joke on the first scene and james bond villain style disabled mafia family all rubbed me the wrong way.
They introduced eugenics in their universe in the worse way possible.
Like, if 'lemon' is a slur, and it sounds like it (in universe, i know in real life it just describes hazardous cars that gets discontinued for safety reason), then it's kinda bad that the protagonist keeps using that word without ever learning to stop.
The iffy part didn't start here, in the first movie Lightning was doing false *medical* advertisement for a rust treatment oil but it was at least acknowledged to be _bad,_ since he looked so uncomfortable after seeing cars rotting, having their whole jaw fall off.
As a kid I played the game that came from this and never watched the film, so I was very surprised when I saw the film almost a year ago. Like, what. Is this ableism??? Am I reading too much into it? Who made this? Who put this in a vcildren's cartoon😭🤮?!
I know they didn’t intend to include ableism, but why didn’t anybody working on the film even try to point this out?? 💀
Been seeing a lot of Cars 2 love recently. I wonder how the fan boys will react to this
Nah, I’m a cars 2 fanboy but I can admit it is a shitty movie, it is bad but I enjoy it anyway (mostly because of Francesco)
Be prepared for the apocalypse. Cars 2 fanboy war.
People only like it because of nostalgia
Cars 2 is a harmless sequel which is why i cant say its bad unlike cars 3 which craps on mqueens legacy
proud fanboy of cars 2 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏😹😹😹🫵🫵🫵
They should've called the film "MATOR: A cars spinoff"
Or Maters Tallest Tale: Spy Mater
honestly i've never really gotten into the cars 2 hate, i argue that cars as a franchise on its foundation was already pretty underdeveloped out of necessity and so turning the second film into a spy thriller would be just as insane as the premise of the world existing. my only gripe i would say is that for the plot to continue, characters have to be lobotomized in order to believe matter is a really competent spy just really deep in character. there was probably a way they could have kept him in the story without lowering the intelligence of spies of all people. at the end of all this however i end up laughing at the film for existing more than i get annoyed at it for that one gripe i have
Cars 2 felt like a movie within a movie to me, like it wasn't real, but just a film that would be made in the Cars universe that cars would watch, that Mater and McQueen just starred in.
This feels like one of those shady, foreign, knock-off movies for sale at most of the dollar stores.
My issue with Cars 2 was that the cars all felt "too human". They ate food (instead of just needing oil and gas), used their tires as hands (see also the handshake Lightning and Mater have), and they had facilities like bathrooms. It ruined my willing suspense of disbelief.
It's like they had an idea for a spy movie but felt like they needed the Cars brand to make it.
Cars 1 had bathrooms? At the race it's shown there's a line.
@@Mulletman25 yeah vbut the difference between that and this one was that the bathroom shot was just to make fun of females but this movie was having too many real world human activcy.
This felt a bit like the Unlucky Tug’s review on Cars 2. This movie should have focused more on the World Grand Prix.
Agreed. This film may be one that I watch all the time after switching my brain off.
I like Cars 2 more than Cars 3 fight me
im not gonna fight you its ok if you like cars 2 over 3
Bro cars 3 is literally better, Cars 3 had good plot, good characters, and better comedy than Cars 2. Cars 3 is more realistic too. The only thing that's good in Cars 2 is the action (sorry for my bad english)
Cars 2 is more like a spinoff than a sequel
If Cars just focus on just RACING alone, the movie would be more enjoyable and make sense, and hence better reviews.
something that bothers me even when i was child regarding this movie is the fact that McQueen went to the outside lane during the first race in tokyo, sorry but lightning lost the race was totally his fault, he has no right to be angry with mater Because if he is aware that switching to the outside lane could cost him the victory, why does he do it then? He is no longer a rookie, he is in the world grand prix! if he is already a professional racer he should have simply ignored mater and left francesco bernoulli in his place from the start,
but of course he didn't do that because..........I don't know, I guess John Lasseter didn't come up with a better idea for McQueen to get mad at Mater
“So the plot can happen!” - The guy that wears a suit in Pitch Meeting with a file of papers.
@@matthewramoszuniga2889 Indeed, also xd
You may call me a jerk,but i would have done the same (i mean,would have been mad).
Mater was being so annoying.
@@honeycat3590 ok , also why I have to call you a jerk?
opinions are valid
@@ghidorahzetto283 well, a jerk for yellin at my best friend and feeling embarrassed for his/her behavior, even though I chose him/her myself….
Okay, Lightning is just my description, i can also be a jerk sometimes and snap at others (most recently for no reason),which is why his anger looks a bit justified to me.
And I’m glad he always feels regretful for being rude to Doc, Mater or Cruz
To me this movie is more mediocre than straight up horrible, but I still wonder how it got away with a G rating, there’s a lot of death and a torture scene!
It’s probably because of this film that most animated films are rated PG and some animated films I’ve seen don’t have that much questionable subject matter to warrant a PG and could just be rated G and nothing would change. I’m even starting to wonder if there’s any point to having the G rating anymore and maybe the MPAA should just retire the rating altogether.
Because the characters are cars, so the violence is less "gory" (as in with human blood and all).
And it's probably because PIXAR is one of those few animation companies that can get away with a G rating in their movies (Cars 3 and Toy Story 4 are quite recent films that managed to get a G rating during an age where PG is more common and marketable).
Yeah. Cars 2 might be one of Pixar’s darkest movies ever made to be honest.
How are you maintaining this impressive af release schedule? Bravo, good sir
I liked this movie
Same.....
Same but the first one is still better
Same.
As a kid i genuinely really liked it, even bought a few toys, but as an adult, i like it for how stupid and weird it is lol.
I would say cars 2 should have been just a prequal and not a sequel. For me personally I like cars 2 when I was a kid and still probably now. I think they just wanted to make a movie about the relief character and have it be a spy movie. I haven't watch the new cars but all I know is that its good.
Cars 2 is a genuine good movie in my opinion. Maybe it doesnt fit as a sequel to 'Cars' but the story is good. If they had called it like 'Cars undercover' or something and not as a sequel to the first movie but rather a side story i think it wouldn't have gotten so much hate cause I still enjoy this movie and I always did. I think it might even be better than 'Cars' but I also understand if you dont agree on that. Cars 2 just gets too nmuch hate for a good movie I mean its definetely better than some other sequels lik 'Cloudy with a chance of meatballs 2'.
I btw think Cars 3 is absolute garbage
2:13 They thought he was a spy because he had knowledge about old Volkswagens that literally anybody interested in classic cars would know and that's just in our world, I would think that would be even better known in the cars world. The spies should have actually gone for something complicated.
I think Cars 2 is overall mediocre. While the action is good and there were a COUPLE funny jokes, but it’s still not as good as the first and third movies. At least Cars 3 was an improvement over this one.
But hey, I don’t want to bash on this movie too much because it IS a Pixar film after all. And I still have a lot of respect for Pixar whether for the better or worse.
Do “Why Shrek the Third is a horrible film in the franchise”.
Schaffrillas did this already lol
@@LazyOldFusspot_3428 I hope Toy Story 5 will be badder than Cars 2
@@danejenkinson-tv9kv Ye same lol Pixar needs to learn to stop milking their franchises to death
@@LazyOldFusspot_3428oy Story 4 in my opinion was senseless and pointless
Just because it's a horrible sequel doesn't mean it's a bad movie. I mean, you could say the same for every Ice Age Sequel and Thor Ragnarok. They aren't getting demonized like this one is.
This one is the one bad movie out of all of then.
True.
@@skylord1846 Explain yourselves. I can counter any offense pointed at this film.
For example, people complain about this being a generic spy film. Well when has there ever been one with a protagonist with imposter syndrome?
@@user-dy1dz1lz9t What do you mean? I’m just simply agreeing with you.
I noticed how hated this movie was, it isn't that bad, the plot is good and I like the chararcters, people hate it because it went from racing to spy thriller then racing, theres more negativity then positivity.
People hate it because the plot doesn’t make any sense, the juvenille humour and idiotic characters.
@@captainmarvelwilson508 The plot would've done better if they switched cars 3 and cars 2
The plot is too complex
I've always found the moment where Mater shouts "Iiiiii'm not a spyyyyyyy!!! To be cringe.
Can do DreamWorks sequel like How To Train Your Dragon 2, Shrek 2, and Kung Fu Panda 2 about why these sequels are the best.
Dreamworks is kinda like Valve of the animation industry, they make sequels that are far better than the original in the majority, Sam Raimi did the same thing with spider-man 2.
People always say that it was a bad movie that ruined the Cars franchise, but the biggest crime is this is somehow in the catalogue of Pixar, and had none of that charm, heart, charisma and good messages that other movies by the studio had. I just don’t know why nobody ever says that because the signs are so clear that this is so out of sync to what Pixar has done before and even after.
i like this movie
Based
Even though Cars 2 is bad, why did the score go so hard?
Cause no matter the quality of the film, the score is always the best part of the film and it’s RARE when a score is as bad as the film itself.
For me, it will always be Monsters University with tiresome clichés from every school movie and series, and rejected characters from The Muppets and Sesame Street.
Why do you hate Monsters University? I thought Monsters University did a terrific job at crafting an origin story for the friendship of Mike Wazowski and James P. Sullivan when they started out as foes, like Woody and Buzz Lightyear were in the original Toy Story film.
While I don't think it's the worst Pixar movie. Brave and the Good Dinosaur take that spot. Cars 2 stands out for being the first bad Pixar film. Which makes it seem worse in the eyes of the public, but I can at least watch parts of the movie and enjoy them.
More than I can say about Brave and the Good Dinosaur that's for sure.
I didn’t like Cars 2, not only the fact I despise spy movies, even this movie had too many spy cliches as the main reason why I hate them, but it’s because of how this movie is too violent and out of place for a G-rated movie, and the heroes are causing a lot more death and destruction than the villains. Granted, the characters they killed are only bad guys and they probably get what they deserved, but the problem is they’ve only killed two agents, the racers that got shot by an EMP survived that, and when they did capture the heroes, they only follow the cliched spy villain archetype by putting them in easily escapable death traps, which breaks the suspension of disbelief. And if the heroes are only defending themselves, they could’ve just stun them with tasers or something instead of slaughtering them, like Kratos. I know there are people who like this film for a different reason, mostly because of nostalgia, and that’s okay, but as a kid watching it, I was like confused by the storyline and characters, and every time I’ve been viewing so many cliches like this, I’m getting tired of it.
When I was little, I was obsessed with both Toy Story and Cars. I had this huge collection of Lightning McQueen, Mater, and the rest of the characters. I still have them in my room. When the teaser trailer for Cars 2 dropped, my parents showed me the trailer and I was super excited for the sequel. Once the movie came out, I loved it. At first, I thought Cars 2 did successfull in the box office. Little did I know, this movie failed, which I can see why. The story should've focused on McQueen's story. Its his franchise. In my opinion, Cars 1's animation is better than the other Cars movies due to how shiny it is. Sure Cars 2 & 3 have better improvement with lighting but Cars 1 looked really beautiful. Now that I'm turning 19 in December, I think Cars 2 was an okay movie. However, Cars 1 & 3 is much better.
If I’m honest, focusing on Cars 3 on a side-note, I don’t mind the whole “passing the torch” thing to Cruz Ramirez but the fact that the trailers made it so focused on Lightning McQueen and not on Cruz Ramirez was just, to b who eat, insulting. It’s not the biggest problem but there are other ways of making this work and maybe adding in a fourth Cars movie and that’s to wait until it happens. For example, McQueen heard about Cruz saying that she wanted to be a racer forever because of him. McQueen is, as usual, shocked by this like in the movie and wanted to make it up to her. He makes a deal with Cruz saying that if he wins against Storm and wins another Piston Cup (I’m not sure how the time would of year it would go), he, Smoky, and the other legends would then train her to be, either a fellow teammate for McQueen’s organization, let Tex assist them in making her the next Dinoco driver like in the end. All of that would be in the next movie but that’s just me. What do you think? Is this a good idea or would you prefer what we got in the Final Cut or in the deleted scenes for the final race? Like I said, I don’t mind what we got but I felt like it could’ve been done better.
As for Cars 2, this was the start of the downfall of Pixar overall whereas the previous movie, Toy Story 3, was the perfect ending for the franchise and the end of the Golden Age of Pixar (1995-2010). This movie should not have existed.
You're such a great UA-camr man keep it up 👍
Love the videos, man. Keep it up!!!
Cars: racing
Cars 2: spy stuff
Cars 3: racing
Yeah, this trilogy has probably the weirdest pattern I’ve seen so far.
AND CRY ABOUT IT
Cars 2 could have been a spin off if it starred mater
I mean, You’re not wrong. Cars 2 doesn’t work as a sequel, but if you actually separate it from Cars 1, and 3, it’s actually not bad, I actually do like this movie, a lot. I liked everything about the movie. From the characters, to the story, to the animation, to the main character, to the soundtrack, etc. This movie would definitely work better as a spinoff. And other movies have done this before. Like Puss in Boots the last wish for example. I’m not saying it’s the best Pixar movie, but I think it definitely is one of the best in my humble opinion. And besides, Pixar definitely has had worse movies then Cars 2. like Toy Story 4, The Good Dinosaur, Lightyear, and the worst Pixar movie ever made, Turning Red.
Even if I did separate it from the other two movies, it is still bad because of the idiotic plot with so many holes and contrivances and the stupid idiotic characters.
@@captainmarvelwilson508 That’s valid. If you hate the movie, then that’s perfectly fine. I’m just giving my thoughts and opinions on this subject. After all, we all have different opinions on the same movie.
Yeh
Toy Story 4 is more succesful than Cars 2. It got higher ratings too
@@sergio9793 Toy Story 4 is overrated.
As a kid watching this movie when it came out, I didn't even notice any of the issues with how out of character this sequel was to the franchise and just took it as fun entertainment. But I get your point and I'm glad the sufferable goofy hijinks outwits everything trend sorta died out
Cars 2 is a movie for KIDS only. End of story. Nothing logical is in it, so imo it's not worth waisting your time criticizing it. I think that makes alot of sense.
"Cars 2 is a movie for KIDS only. End of story. Nothing logical is in it, so imo it's not worth waisting your time criticizing it."
screw you.
I got the DVD after I saw the film in theaters, very time I tried to put the DVD in the DVD player, I was always hesitant despite I thought at the time the movie was good. I guess my body was ahead of time
Bro you straight up roasted mater
Here's the thing ost kind of is really good
11:44 he wanted to get to paradise falls. Swallow falls is in Cloudy with a chance of meatballs :)
The fact that I loved this movie as a kid...I am so embarrassed now 😖
Dont feel embarrassed 😢 it happens
Cars 2 is litterally the best animated film humans have ever created... So sad seeing a masterpiece being slandered like this
Nice
Lol you buggin mater was annoying
Prove how it’s better than Spirited away
It's so sad that you think Cars 2 is a masterpiece
@@not_a_shroom7190 FR, one of the only sane people here
I just can't get over why Cars got a sequel over The Incredibles.
don't forget Cars on the Road
I haven't watched this movie...one reason because a whole movie featuring Mater...nuff said.
However, I would probably watch Cars 2 and love it over that bizarre Good Dinosaur movie. *shudders*
All pixar sequels(except for toy story) focus on another character making him their protagonist. In finding Nemo marlin was the main character, but in finding dory dory was the main. In the incredibles mr incredible was the main character and in the sequel, elastgirl was the protagonist. And lastly, in monsters inc, sullen was the main character but in the prequel( monsters University) they focused on mike, making him the main character
Doing something different in a sequel is completely fine, as long as the directors care about what the original set up and make the different stuff an expansion of the universe. Cars 2 does not do any of that, and just randomly brings in spies to a series that was mostly about racing.
I liked cats three but the ending was stupid.
This movie is overheated Mater is my favorite character in the whole franchise he deserved a movie about himself and the psychics aren’t even that bad and I like to change more violent movie and I find it funny the fact that it’s still a G rated movie dark is G rated movie ever made that are toy story three
Though I am not technically a hater of this movie- tho i do see why it is and I do feel that it is not as connected to the first film- NGL the soundtrack lives rent free in my head.
Me still waiting for him to talk about Mario lol
But you gotta admit that“ it’s Finn micmissile” is a fire track
I honestly loved Cars 2
Same....
I unironically loved this movie as a kid maybe it was because it’s a spy movie with sentient cars
I haven’t watched this video and I’ll probably update my comment when I watch it later but as a cars fan yes
Cars 2 sucks as a sequel
But if you just watch the movie and kinda ignore the other two it’s a fun movie to watch
I wouldn’t say it’s a bad movie it probably has flaws but I do really like this movie lol
I feel like people are forgetting that this is FOR KIDS. It’s a movie that is meant to be dumb fun. Yes we all know how much better this movie could be but what we were given was still good. Why are people hating as if they just don’t like spy thrillers. The characters are fun and I don’t think we necessarily needed another story arc about lighting when we got a good one in the first movie. This movie tackles the fact that everyone sees matter as an idiot very well. Also I find it weird that people think cars 3 should be 2, like what? So after the first one we’re supposed to just skip all the way to him being retired, even that doesn’t make sense cause there is hardly any concept of time in these films.
"I feel like people are forgetting that this is FOR KIDS. It’s a movie that is meant to be dumb fun."
screw you.
Cars 2 was a great movie can't change my mind, they released a banger of a game with it too.
Yeh, the game is a masterpiece.
Cars 2 and Lightyear? I think you forgot to mention Brave. Brave is Pixar's worst film that is not a sequel or a prequel. May 20, 2023, 1:42pm
Toy Story 3 Cars 2 both have twist villains Lotso and Miles Axlerod
A world grand prix movie showing mcqueens midpoint of his racing career would of been much better than this attrocity of a movie
Mater is cannonicly ableist according to this movie
there is one good defense for cars 2. unlike cars 1 and 3, in this movie the characters being cars actually matters. as in the story wont be the same if they used humans as car drivers instead of anthro cars. a big criticism of the cars movies is exactly that.. the characters being cars is not serving a huge purpose story wise and the movies could easily be about humans that drive cars instead and have basically the same plot.
They should have added more racing less spy thriller because I absolutely loved the racing scenes as it was pretty cool, but the spy thriller thing was wierd and out of place.
Nah It’s the second worse behind Toy Story 4
True. Say what you will about Cars 2, but that movie at least didn’t ruin a perfect ending.
Say what you want about Cars 2, I don’t think it’s too bad, especially compared to Toy Story 4! Seriously, Toy Story 4 completely disregards the lessons taught by the first 3 movies, ends in a way that prevents Woody from coming back and overall even makes FoodFight! look like Spirited Away!
Yeah, Toy Story 4 is Pixar's most unnecessary sequel in my opinion.
Idk compared to all the pixars after covid. This is by far better.
No it’s even worse
5:08 bro is fucking seething lmaoooo
are you stupid? literally he talks about the movie other than that little ass part
at least the Cars 2 game is good.
You over complicated Miles plan. He found a huge oil reserve at the same time the world was going more alternative fuel. What better way to go back to fossil fuels than to make alternative fuels look bad?
I agree with this whole video. the only thing i disagree about is about they should have kept adding new characters. I literally hated cars 2 its the worst kids movie imo. I'm so happy that cars 3 ditches everything that happened in cars 2. Bc if those cars 2 characters that were the (most unlikable characters I've ever watched). It would just divide the cars franchise even more.
i used to like this as a kid but now after rewatching it, its really is a horrible sequel
13:37 Can you maybe explain what a good Cars 2 sequel could have looked like, because from your video it appears you have no idea what you are talking about and rather just talking crap
Cars 2 is the best in the cars franchise
Pixar really shit the bed with this movie. It's illogical in a bad way. Even a movie as amazingly bad as Sharknado or cartoons as insane as Roadrunner cartoons felt more logical than Cars 2.
I can accept illogical stuff in a fictional work. But, the illogical aspects of a fictional work at least have to be funny (ex: Sharknado movies allow sharks to breathe outside of water and be carried by tornadoes so they can attack people, Roadrunner cartoons are meant to be funny and fantastical).
They're self-aware about their absurdity, hence where the cheap laughs come in. They have some basis in reality, too. Sharks can and have landed in neighborhood lawns and streets after a really bad hurricane. Sure, they're dead and dried out, but the idea of sharks being carried out of the ocean by a dangerous cyclone isn't out of the realm of possibility. Likewise, predator and prey relationships do exist in Nature, and coyotes do eat birds. Birds like the peregrine falcon can move at racecar-like speeds, and birds like the magpie are very smart. Thus, a coyote who tries endlessly to catch a super-fast and crafty bird is believable. Sharknado and Roadrunner cartoons are just an exaggerated version of real life and Nature, in other words.
There're a lot of laughs that can come from looking at cars with big, googly windshield eyes. That's partly why folks enjoyed Cars 1. The vehicles were anthropomorphic, but not too much. They were just minivans, semi trucks, tow trucks, sports cars, etc that could talk and emote. That's it.
-They race.
-They consume gasoline, not food
-They use car washes to stay clean
-They stay in giant traffic cones and gas stations for shelter
-Because the front bumpers and headlights of cars somewhat resemble animal-like faces and a car's tires resemble the legs of a quadrupedal animal, you can bring a car to life pretty easily. It helps that cars like a Ford Mustang or a Chevy Corvette have more personality and charisma than other consumer products like a computer or a toaster.
A world of cars built by cars. There's a basis in reality for this setup because cars do in fact need to go car washes to stay clean and need gasoline to stay in working condition. Just perfect!
But, in Cars 2, we see:
-Vehicles eating wasabi and tacos instead of gasoline
-Vehicles drinking cocktails and beer instead of gasoline
-No more giant traffic cones. Now only buildings that could only have been constructed for human use
-The bathrooms, which really should've been car washes like in Cars 1, are now man-made bathrooms with bathroom stalls and sinks that are presumably designed for human use.
-The bathroom stalls would have to be the size of a parking lot to fit multiple vehicles that are >2,000 lbs in weight and >12 feet in length, yet they have sinks that would only work for human hands.
-We even see a lavatory truck right outside of an airplane, which implies that vehicles can, uhh, defecate....?
-We see airplanes that are large enough only to fit cars and trucks that are probably about 1-5 tons in weight. So, if you're a 30+ ton semi truck or a 500+ ton train, then you can't travel to see the rest of the world. Sucks to be you.
They aren't even self-aware about the absurdity or anything. Even if they had been self-aware, there's no humor behind a man-made setting without humans and only consumer products because they have no basis in reality. The illogical aspects of Cars 2 hurt the Cars series overall by making the viewer conjure up all sorts of vile, disgusting images about how these Cars' biology would work. Just look at all the creepy-ass videos online that try to explain how the Cars' bodies work.
This is why I dont really feel the nostalgic about this movie.. the only I feel nostalgic is cars 1 and 3.. this movie is just so random to me with all the spies and sh**
cars 3 was the best of em all
I don’t understand why you called the franchise stupid it is just this movie that is bad while cars 1 and 3 are really good
Any more videos about praising something coming?
👋🤌🤌🤙🖐🤞👉👆✊💪👏🤚👊☝👇🤞🤙👉🤘👆🖐🤞👋👎🤘🤛👍👎🖕✍🤝🦵👍👆👍👎✌🤘🤛🤟🖕🖐✌🖖👌👌👌☝👍🤜🦶👂✌🤘🤚🖐🤙🖕🤙🤙🤞🤘🤚🤘✋🤚🤘👇🤙👈✊👈🤞🤘🤘🤘
they will come after you stop liking your own comments
@@maxpeer5370 false, I did not like my own comment. The world is bigger than that; just because no one else commented and mine had a like doesn't mean I was the one who liked it.
I get that me taking the time to say this much makes it seem more that I did, I care to defend from hasty accusers.
@@nintendofan1750 🤓
I got it. I realize why Car 2 was so shit. It was sponsered by Range Rover
I like Cars 2
Enjoyably Terrible Sequel
Ehhhhhh sequel role aside, I genuinely enjoy Cars 2; it’s fun, it’s interesting, complex, rewatchable… plus I kinda find the original kinda bland in comparison of Cars 2. As a kid I loved the chase scenes, different locations/scenery, the confrontations, and the action. Imagine parents making a kid name John, then another one comes alone named John 2, he’s part of the family but is his own person. Yeah and that’s my two cents! (don’t hate me)
We have to accept that Cars 2 is neither good nor perfect, it has many errors, it is far from being the best and for some reason the animation critics classify it as one of the worst animated films of the last decade, shit.
Never watched Cars 2. 4:26 we're not
Even gonna address that the cars are getting on a fuckin' plane?! I know that's not what the video is about but as someone who's only seen this movie in clips sporadically it really caught me off guard lol