IIHS Car Crash Test Compilation - Midsize Cars Reviewed

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • Midsize car crash compilation IIHS
    -
    The Honda Accord outperformed other midsize cars in the updated moderate overlap front crash test, earning a rare good rating in the new, challenging evaluation focused on rear-seat protection.
    Among the other six midsize cars tested, the Subaru Outback earns an acceptable rating. The Nissan Altima and Toyota Camry are rated marginal. The Hyundai Sonata, Kia K5 and Volkswagen Jetta are rated poor.
    These results are valid only for models sold in the USA
    Do you like it?
    Comment, like, dislike, share!
    -
    Follow us: / @youcartv
    Join us to enjoy exclusive benefits: / @youcartv
    ✅ Source: IIHS
    Original content at iihs.org or UA-cam channel: / @iihs-hldi
    If you are interested to request to use the original content for any purpose, please contact legal@iihs.org.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 152

  • @SterlingSigurdsen
    @SterlingSigurdsen Рік тому +32

    How did the Subaru score acceptable? The rear pasagener smacked their head on the window sill, and their head went under the curtain, because there is no protection there, just a piece of cloth.

    • @calebj2886
      @calebj2886 Рік тому +9

      Actual measured forces probably show it wasn’t a serious impact. That and the head going under the airbag isn’t doing much.

    • @HR-wd6cw
      @HR-wd6cw 5 місяців тому +4

      @@calebj2886 Yes that and if you look at where the glass went, it went up and out, so it sort of "blew" out if you will. You're more likely to be injured by something else other than the rear window breaking like that (such as the headliner coming down when the airbag deploys or like in the case of the Honda, you bang your head on the top of the roof liner, which could be more serious than perhaps a few scratches or cuts from glass, which I don't think even happened here. But basically they assume that all glass will break anyway so it isn't really a factor to be tested (and in some cases, you want the glass to break). The only "window" that is of siginficance in a crash is the windshield.

    • @johnnybingstrom2427
      @johnnybingstrom2427 26 днів тому

      These cars have come a long way since the 90 s...
      But they all still have a long way to walk before i would call them real safe in all aspects...
      The knowledge is already existing in making them much more safe than today...
      And maybe lets say 75 kilos in high capacity strength steal added in doors reinforcement and in the big side beam in the inner middle of the doors can get bigger and much stronger...
      And the lover side part of cars body can get little wider and stronger too🚗👍☀️🌟😀
      Especially the side pole crasch test and the ordinary car crash into side test shows big needs of improvements in all cars..
      And there needs to be knee and leg side airbags for all 4 passengers so the legs doesnt get really hard punched in the crasch tests!!
      This is just the truth...
      Enough said 😎😎

  • @rckxu5969
    @rckxu5969 Рік тому +20

    Honda winning on this one!

  • @HHSTT
    @HHSTT Рік тому +3

    Cool music. 🎼

    • @maxdabss
      @maxdabss 11 місяців тому +1

      it’s Nihilism on I-10 by Amulets

  • @Pdep90
    @Pdep90 Рік тому +36

    Camry should have been poor since all that back glass shattered on the inside

  • @georgevavoulis4758
    @georgevavoulis4758 Рік тому +22

    Subaru should get POOR look where rear passenger's head went

    • @2019Q7Quattro
      @2019Q7Quattro Рік тому +2

      The vehicle protected the dummy well, and the reason it got marked down is indeed because of where the dummy’s head went

    • @johnnybingstrom2427
      @johnnybingstrom2427 26 днів тому

      It needs to be taken into account all the angles and places that passengers head could hit the side of the car....
      I did not watch car crash tests for many years and i am deeply shocked how really bad the side crasch tests came out for so many cars...
      I was expecting the sides of the cars to be at least 2 times stronger than this tests...
      This is just the real beginning to develop safety much much more for so many cars...

  • @Shred_central_
    @Shred_central_ Рік тому +61

    It’s crazy how far cars have come in the past 25 years with safety features

    • @FriendofMineralTown
      @FriendofMineralTown Рік тому +2

      Yeah it seems like everything used to be completely horrible and now it’s just “poor”.

  • @wu1f_
    @wu1f_ 3 місяці тому +3

    0:18 was that the gartic phone noise?

  • @pluggedev8464
    @pluggedev8464 Рік тому +12

    Got to be honest, I would consider any of these, compared to where cars rated from the nineties and early 2000’s these all all seem great

  • @mrtolberbone
    @mrtolberbone Рік тому +37

    Makes me feel so much better about buying a 23’ Accord Hybrid!

    • @Cakewalk.
      @Cakewalk. Рік тому +2

      I already knew, saw years back 2017 i’d say when my College buddies drove to my place, they got into an accident, the Rav 4 had the most damage and declared total compared to the accord same model of of one of my friends car as well that got involved in the same accident in a 4 pin car crash by a truck behind the accord and the rav 4 in front of the accord.

  • @georgevavoulis4758
    @georgevavoulis4758 Рік тому +13

    Subaru should have been a FAIL the side airbag for rear occupant allowed the head to slip between airbag and door resulting in a serious injury

    • @calebj2886
      @calebj2886 Рік тому

      well according to actual measured data, there was no serious injury risk.

  • @cheez1012
    @cheez1012 Рік тому +17

    The Outback did pretty good considering it's on an aging platform

  • @emikomina
    @emikomina Рік тому +6

    FRONT RATING
    POOR - KIA, HYUNDAI, VW
    MARGINAL - TOYOTA, NISSAN
    ACCEPTABLE - SUBARU
    GOOD - HONDA

    • @emikomina
      @emikomina Рік тому +4

      toyota, nissan, and vw especially need to do better. meanwhile hyundai/kia are dangerous as they've always been.

    • @that_one_villa
      @that_one_villa Рік тому

      ​@@emikomina I still prefer to drive them since my life aint worth that much anyways lmao

  • @BDOC99714
    @BDOC99714 Рік тому +6

    Not sure why the Jetta is here when it’s a compact car, the rest of the cars in this test are actually midsize and more similar in length/width to one another

    • @2019Q7Quattro
      @2019Q7Quattro Рік тому +1

      Well I think the Jetta got heavier during the 2019 remodel, putting it in the Midsize sedan category

    • @BDOC99714
      @BDOC99714 Рік тому +2

      @@2019Q7Quattro the Jetta is still at least 200lbs lighter than all of the rest of the actual midsize sedans though

    • @2019Q7Quattro
      @2019Q7Quattro Рік тому +1

      But that isn’t too much lighter than the rest

  • @carlosleonardobarragan8957
    @carlosleonardobarragan8957 Рік тому +7

    I love my 2023 Honda accord ❤

  • @laurenmccann6835
    @laurenmccann6835 8 місяців тому +2

    Frightening that the camerys back window shattered.

  • @ericcarabetta1161
    @ericcarabetta1161 Рік тому +10

    How much is the structural integrity affected by cutting a one-square-foot hole in the roof?

    • @op3l
      @op3l Рік тому +5

      It would be negligible. The outer metal is mostly for looks, there’s cross structures under the sheet metal that provides the actual support.

  • @georgevavoulis4758
    @georgevavoulis4758 Рік тому +9

    Subaru rear passenger head went between side airbag and window it should get a POOR rating

  • @jasonpsaropoulos7581
    @jasonpsaropoulos7581 9 місяців тому +1

    Bruh the have the Subaru acceptable when the kids head ended up on the wrong side of the air bag

  • @getcreative01
    @getcreative01 Рік тому +1

    Background music very annoying. I watched with the volume turned down.

  • @lastblueride5
    @lastblueride5 17 днів тому

    how is a outback a mid-size sedan? why not just use a Subaru Legacy which everyone & the manufacturer considers a midsize sedan instead of a SUV

  • @tyson145
    @tyson145 6 місяців тому +1

    I have an all original 1968 Chevy Impala (pillarless 4-door) that is family owned since day 1. I'm the 3rd gen to have it.
    I watch stuff like this, where these cars are rated "poor" and think to myself....."well, shit, if I get into a crash like this with my Impala, I might as well drive with my belt off, I'm going to die anyways!"
    For the record (if you know my car) I do at least wear the lap belt.

  • @battlefield3112011
    @battlefield3112011 6 місяців тому +1

    Damn. How the hell that the rear windshield on the Camry shatter from a front crash. That is deadly.

  • @georgevavoulis4758
    @georgevavoulis4758 Рік тому +5

    This would be my dream job 😊😊😊. I like to know how long time wise does it take to prepare one vehicle for a crash test ? Why don't we see more cars such as Bently ,Rolls Royce ,Ferraries ,Lamborghini, Porsche etc .

    • @Xian..
      @Xian.. Рік тому +2

      They need to crash it around 100 times to get accurate results so expensive cars aren’t really practical to crash test.

    • @PhillipineLover612
      @PhillipineLover612 Рік тому +1

      Those Cars are Expensive and there not really a car you see possibly every day

    • @RidgeMu
      @RidgeMu Рік тому

      But it's boring.

    • @Xian..
      @Xian.. Рік тому

      @@RidgeMu Different opinions. And won’t it be fun to go to work to crash cars.

    • @Sashazur
      @Sashazur 11 місяців тому

      I’m just guessing but they don’t have unlimited money, so if they test cheaper cars they can test more of them more thoroughly, and those cars are much more common which means the tests will potentially save many more people from injury or death.

  • @boahneelassmal
    @boahneelassmal 2 місяці тому

    it would be nice if the reasons for the ratings would be given.... in my eyes, while the head was caught on the headliner, the jetta it didn't had the head go out the window... literally. like the outback had....

  • @wlfrm01f79
    @wlfrm01f79 Рік тому +1

    It seems to me that Jetta swallowed the blow better, but there is a safety margin. Toyota - passengers are cut by the rear window, Honda - a very hard body blow, passengers flew up, Kia/Hyundai - it's just a misunderstanding!!! Subaru - the rear passenger's head is 100% torn off in an accident.

  • @jehanzebraoof493
    @jehanzebraoof493 2 місяці тому

    The accord is the best car. Even though the rear passenger hit his head on the roof, its really a little injury compared to the Camry where the rear glass shattered. Even though the accord is little expensive then the camry, its much safer.

  • @svenlindsey1553
    @svenlindsey1553 7 місяців тому

    The Jetta seems safer than the Camry, no glass shattered like the Camry, possibly harming someone very seriously

  • @TitusJordan-ex4lp
    @TitusJordan-ex4lp 2 місяці тому

    I was concerned by the 2023 Hyundai sonata by the rear passengers arm in between the window and airbag

  • @mrmunchin2578
    @mrmunchin2578 10 місяців тому +1

    why is the music SO SCARY

  • @Drifty_Car
    @Drifty_Car 2 місяці тому

    Dang that beginning of video was epic 0:01 0:01 0:02 0:02 0:03 0:03 0:04 0:04 0:05 0:05 0:06 0:06 0:07 0:07 0:08

  • @miatand1156
    @miatand1156 10 місяців тому +3

    Just saw the honda. What a joke the rear passenger hits the roof edge and it's the only one to get a good rating. Now I'm convinced it's a pay for rating system.

    • @halogen_lamp
      @halogen_lamp 5 місяців тому

      There are also criteria for evaluating the failure value if a mannequin hits its head on the interior. It would be GOOD to include that.

    • @HR-wd6cw
      @HR-wd6cw 5 місяців тому +1

      It could be, but I think part of it is these tests are all weighted. So for example, while hitting one's head on the roof/liner of the car in an accident sounds bad, what may be worse is someone having the lap belt slide up into their stomach (like they mentioned) and causing internal organ damage. The latter is probably more serious then perhaps a cut on the head or a concussion. The ratings are also a composite of many factors too, so particular rating (say front impact) may have "G" for everything else and maybe "Acceptable" for one smaller element, like the head thing, and still get a good "Rating" although I think in the updated rating system (which they changed around 2018-2020 I think) they use the lowest rating in the bunch for the overall rating, but there may still be "weight" applied to different aspects of each rating for each component.

  • @justcallmejohn2833
    @justcallmejohn2833 Рік тому +5

    Doesn’t cutting a hole in the roof compromise the structure?

    • @rugbynimbus
      @rugbynimbus 11 місяців тому

      Sheetmetal only, not the frame (in theory, anyway).

  • @OzgurY-it3rl
    @OzgurY-it3rl 11 місяців тому +2

    Thank you very much!

  • @arlenemellina5260
    @arlenemellina5260 4 місяці тому +1

    3:43 The sonata did well

  • @CarlosGutierrez-ee5ly
    @CarlosGutierrez-ee5ly Рік тому +1

    El ñiño de atras el subaru😢😢

  • @АдиТемиро
    @АдиТемиро Рік тому +1

    Now I will wait for the tests of Volvo, BMW, Mercedes.

  • @bigrig9749
    @bigrig9749 Рік тому +7

    I’d take the Accord

  • @op3l
    @op3l Рік тому +5

    So the cars that did poorly probably did poorly because they weren’t designed with this test in mind. Similar to that small overlap test introduced a few years ago,p in which almost all cars failed or did poorly. So don’t read too much into this unless it’s a car that was released after this updated test was introduced.

    • @ouch1011
      @ouch1011 Рік тому +2

      The tests are designed to simulate real world crash scenarios. So, what you’re saying is that the cars that did poorly in this test did so because they were not designed with real world crash scenarios in mind.

    • @op3l
      @op3l Рік тому +1

      @@ouch1011Yes that's what I'm saying. They don't get good ratings from this test also means in a real crash they will not perform as well as the "Good" cars.
      But give them the next model generation where they know this is something they have to design for and the cars that are doing "Poor" or "Marginal" will do better and thus become safer in the real world.
      That's what I mean by that.

  • @Billy_plays2017
    @Billy_plays2017 2 місяці тому

    2:27 looks like an explosion shockwave hit the car

  • @2019Q7Quattro
    @2019Q7Quattro Рік тому +2

    Sucks how my car (KIA K5) Received a poor rating, I wonder if the trim I have (GT-Line AWD) would perform better than the LXS (base model) and trims under the GT-Lines, as well as my Fiancé’s car (Hyundai Sonata) earned a poor as well, but I think the trim she has (N-Line) would perform better than the SE (base model)

    • @Dizney82
      @Dizney82 Рік тому +5

      Serious question, why would the trim of the vehicle make any difference in the crash test? Aren’t the trims just luxury features?

    • @2019Q7Quattro
      @2019Q7Quattro Рік тому +2

      Well I remember back with the Mitsubishi Galant in 2003 and you could only get side airbags on the highest trim level, the GT-LINE K5 is higher quality than the regular, although structural integrity might be the same as the LXS

    • @josephj.6478
      @josephj.6478 Рік тому +2

      How u liking ur K5 btw? I love the look of that car so I'm curious what owning one is like

    • @Sashazur
      @Sashazur 11 місяців тому

      The structure of the vehicle is the same no matter what trim. Unless a higher trim has more airbags or similar (which is unlikely these days), the crash results are going to be the same. But some higher trims may have collision avoidance or driver assistance features that help avoid or reduce the severity of a crash in the first place.

    • @yourlocal_torres8289
      @yourlocal_torres8289 11 місяців тому +1

      ⁠​⁠@@2019Q7QuattroNow-days, even the base model would have all the airbags, the trims are just for luxury features/more advanced safety features like lane-departure warnings, since it is the same safety-wise it would earn a good in the front seat, where you or your husband would be driving, but if you have any kids it might be a different from them, look at how either the dummy’s neck swings back and forth, or if its submarining. Sorry if it’s a long paragraph, just here to help.

  • @박카스-k1h
    @박카스-k1h 7 місяців тому

    poor hyundai - kia...sonata, k5 worst

  • @DesmondBohs-u9l
    @DesmondBohs-u9l 26 днів тому

    Demario Mountain

  • @Nellie-H
    @Nellie-H Місяць тому

    Fortresses! Considering we survived driving in 1970's, 80's and 90's cars. 😜

  • @BartonModesty
    @BartonModesty 16 днів тому

    015 Sylvester Station

  • @FacuGonz3
    @FacuGonz3 3 місяці тому

    It's crazy that people want more SUVs but mid size cars are still safer.

  • @chandrachurniyogi8394
    @chandrachurniyogi8394 Рік тому

    something is seriously wrong with non-American car manufacturers selling cars in the U.S. once the pride of the automobile industry is faltering when it comes to safety & faltering bad . . .

  • @jobluke
    @jobluke 10 місяців тому

    Hi can you make a video about crashing a a truck covered with Line-x
    Pls 🙏

  • @matthewgrayson8
    @matthewgrayson8 7 місяців тому

    Hondas have always been safer.

  • @saNYa096RUS
    @saNYa096RUS 11 місяців тому

    😂😂😂lol..... when I go to lada 2107 and watch such crash tests😂😂😂😂😂

  • @RaulCastiglione-z8k
    @RaulCastiglione-z8k 25 днів тому

    Torey Estates

  • @WhyetCecilia-v8u
    @WhyetCecilia-v8u 15 днів тому

    Schultz Squares

  • @HarrimanNewman-t3b
    @HarrimanNewman-t3b 19 днів тому

    Rupert Expressway

  • @OllieKirkpatrick-j8q
    @OllieKirkpatrick-j8q 25 днів тому

    Howell Expressway

  • @SpencerDinah-v2i
    @SpencerDinah-v2i 23 дні тому

    Gabriella Overpass

  • @ThelmaBrinkmann-g5y
    @ThelmaBrinkmann-g5y 14 днів тому

    Brown Fields

  • @LloydLoveland-p5m
    @LloydLoveland-p5m 20 днів тому

    Raquel Bridge

  • @DustinHays-o5z
    @DustinHays-o5z 16 днів тому

    Kreiger Highway

  • @RosieBrandy-f8b
    @RosieBrandy-f8b 15 днів тому

    Carter Knolls

  • @GonzaloWilliams-z3g
    @GonzaloWilliams-z3g 26 днів тому

    Welch Point

  • @ZackLocastro-h7b
    @ZackLocastro-h7b 25 днів тому

    Delbert Bridge

  • @imakevdo5799
    @imakevdo5799 7 місяців тому +1

    So informative

  • @ChristianaMavis
    @ChristianaMavis 26 днів тому

    Karine Walks

  • @ShirleyAllen-y7x
    @ShirleyAllen-y7x 22 дні тому

    Kayla Center

  • @JasonGalli-g3o
    @JasonGalli-g3o 22 дні тому

    Gaylord Dam

  • @CarolGallegas-h1k
    @CarolGallegas-h1k 22 дні тому

    Delilah Road

  • @OrlandoUrsula-r6j
    @OrlandoUrsula-r6j 23 дні тому

    Caleb Roads

  • @ReedTruman-f7w
    @ReedTruman-f7w 26 днів тому

    Jayden Manor

  • @TheresaKing-x6g
    @TheresaKing-x6g 20 днів тому

    Dianna Station

  • @EstherMontague-f9b
    @EstherMontague-f9b 20 днів тому

    Hintz Pines

  • @RuthMatthews-j3n
    @RuthMatthews-j3n 21 день тому

    Erdman Lane

  • @KimberlyMyers-s3f
    @KimberlyMyers-s3f 15 днів тому

    Sauer Stravenue

  • @AbigailBenson-o5n
    @AbigailBenson-o5n 22 дні тому

    Thad Rue

  • @ElidiaStoute-e4o
    @ElidiaStoute-e4o 26 днів тому

    Keanu Pass

  • @ftwtech
    @ftwtech 9 місяців тому

    The Outback is an SUV tho💀

  • @mayankgupta5562
    @mayankgupta5562 7 місяців тому

    Waoo it's a great idea to check a whickels....

  • @PhillyDee215
    @PhillyDee215 Рік тому +1

    There's gotta be a material that's more resistant to crashes🎯

    • @SystemRadioStatic
      @SystemRadioStatic Рік тому +1

      There is, some older cars are made of very nice crash resistant materials, though most companies would rather use the cheaper option because that means they can pump out cars quicker ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ it would also crash the repair industry they have if the cars were more resistant to damage so they prolly wont be using better material any time soon

    • @PhillyDee215
      @PhillyDee215 Рік тому

      @@SystemRadioStatic .....yup😏

    • @stained6202
      @stained6202 11 місяців тому +1

      @@SystemRadioStatic What? Newer cars are far safer than older ones. Crumple Zones exist so the car absorbs some of the energy from the crash.

    • @Sashazur
      @Sashazur 11 місяців тому +1

      The car’s structure needs to deform the right amount to absorb some of the crash energy, so less of it is transmitted to the passengers. If you made a car out of materials that don’t bend or break, then more of the energy would be transferred to the people, resulting in more risk of injury. I would rather injure my car than myself!

    • @PhillyDee215
      @PhillyDee215 11 місяців тому

      @@Sashazur makes sense....

  • @that_one_villa
    @that_one_villa Рік тому +6

    Its crazy how the Jetta is now considered midsized
    what the hell

    • @HR-wd6cw
      @HR-wd6cw 5 місяців тому

      Actually, what's surprising is how many cars have made it into this class. What used to be full-size cars 30 years ago, are now mid-sized. The other thing is that the vast majority of cars have gotten larger as the years have gone one. Look at the Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic, etc. They are about the same size as a late 90's TAurus (which is considered a mid-sized car), even though rental agencies for example, still classify Corollas and Civics as compact or small cars (but that's just how they classify different sized cars).

  • @petrpolach9234
    @petrpolach9234 Рік тому +8

    The wisdom from this is that the side airbags hurt the rear passenger more than help.

    • @5610winston
      @5610winston 8 місяців тому

      The Outback, the Accord, and the Altima are the only ones where the rear passenger didn't do _The Exorcist_ effect where the head spins completely around backwardand with the Outback it was because the rear passenger submarined under the side airbacg and came up between the airbag and the window.

  • @KimberlyRogers-h7m
    @KimberlyRogers-h7m 26 днів тому

    Reichel Island

  • @SheikhZedoo
    @SheikhZedoo Рік тому

    The intro talked about our lives.

  • @kamillakordulewska3895
    @kamillakordulewska3895 14 днів тому

    1:29😯😯😯😯😯

  • @bmlove81
    @bmlove81 Рік тому

    Obviously, these vehicles are not running during the test. The transmission is in neutral, and there probably isn't any gas in the gas tank.

    • @rp42069
      @rp42069 Рік тому

      I've never seen testing with the vehicles running. It's always been done this way. They would no longer have control over the test environment.

    • @Nicolas-cg2xx
      @Nicolas-cg2xx Рік тому

      ​@@rp42069check out old crash tests, there's a video of an actual real person driving the car and crashing it into another

    • @Sashazur
      @Sashazur 11 місяців тому

      If they had gas in the tank there would be a high risk of fire or fuel leaks. Sure those are things that it would be good to test for, but it would make testing much more expensive and dangerous. Most cars don’t explode in a crash so it’s probably not worth doing considering the increased problems in testing.

  • @KingkingKong-cn9yj
    @KingkingKong-cn9yj 7 місяців тому

    ❤❤❤🎉

  • @arlenemellina5260
    @arlenemellina5260 4 місяці тому

    5:35 The Altima Was good

  • @dylanofficial456
    @dylanofficial456 4 місяці тому

    2:14 Seriously Toyota

    • @dylanofficial456
      @dylanofficial456 4 місяці тому

      2:28 I already hate Toyota but just look at the glass

  • @maxier99
    @maxier99 7 місяців тому

    😅😅

  • @johnbaldock6353
    @johnbaldock6353 Рік тому +1

    Its 2023, These cars Should BE BETTER!!😱

  • @Gtandbirdguy-123
    @Gtandbirdguy-123 11 місяців тому

    Im in the crash test land

  • @khaihuynh681
    @khaihuynh681 10 місяців тому

    no it s not is subaru😂

  • @arslanafzal1265
    @arslanafzal1265 6 місяців тому

    Jus amazing ❤

  • @Sunny-de3we
    @Sunny-de3we 7 місяців тому +1

    All are fake likes and subscribers. They told me to like it and they will pay me but they didn't.. they disappointed me I'm unlikeing all videos now

  • @mohangupta5631
    @mohangupta5631 7 місяців тому

    Best cresh test

  • @antoinegates9199
    @antoinegates9199 Рік тому

    Yea a Airbags

  • @keaujibaha2594
    @keaujibaha2594 Рік тому +1

    Saw this Test, but with a Jetta involved and it out performed all of the other bigger cars

  • @junlee3515
    @junlee3515 10 місяців тому

    How fast are they going ??

  • @Zachman676
    @Zachman676 11 місяців тому +2

    Honda on top as usual. Just another reason to not buy a Kia or Hyundai

  • @aabehzadi
    @aabehzadi Рік тому +2

    In the Honda, didn't the passenger hit it's head above while going back? The seatbelt didn't keep her safe. How does that get a good rating?

    • @calebj2886
      @calebj2886 Рік тому +2

      The seatbelt stayed on the hips, the dummy didn’t slide in the seat out of position, and i’m betting the seatbelt slack allowed for a little less sudden force change.

  • @popz4470
    @popz4470 8 місяців тому

    Honda ftw! Theres a reason the Korean brands are cheaper!

  • @gtech66
    @gtech66 Рік тому

    How does this work? Do you buy a bunch of brand new cars just to smash them ? What do you do with the damaged cars afterwards?

    • @Nicolas-cg2xx
      @Nicolas-cg2xx Рік тому +4

      You can't be serious 🤦

    • @markpolice3585
      @markpolice3585 Рік тому +1

      @@Nicolas-cg2xx You can explain how it works or I can. Lol

    • @Sashazur
      @Sashazur 11 місяців тому

      Yes they buy new cars just to smash them. They just buy from dealers like anyone else, they don’t get the cars from the manufacturers since that might make it possible to cheat. I don’t know what they do with the wrecks afterwards but they almost certainly junk them; the damage is too great to try to fix them.

    • @Wtrxprs007able
      @Wtrxprs007able 11 місяців тому

      @Sashazur and its government funded, to help manufacturers identify and rectify the issues.

  • @chrisfryer-o1l
    @chrisfryer-o1l 6 місяців тому

    IIHS is clearly biased. The Subaru rear passenger was nearly ejected and gets an acceptable? Camry rear glass shatters moderate? Accord rear passenger bounces off the roof and gets a good? Must be those bright LED lights.