@@JahongHur not really. Tesla is known for making safe cars. There have already been crashes in the CT and every time the driver/passengers just walked away
Do you like these crash tests? Note that the previous frontal crash tests were performed at 64 km/h. In these recordings the speed of the cars being tested is 50 km/h. That's a huge difference!
@@aaronlandry3934most evs have batteries in the center and they also have a crash absorber protecting them, as well as a safety system that automatically isolates the battery (basically just cutting the power to the battery)
I really like the Ioniq 6, but the test results don't seem to match up with the potential damage we see in the cabin. 97% seems relatively high considering some of these other cars have airbags that deploy all around the cabin to prevent heads going through the window even for passengers.
The batteries of electric cars no longer explode and no longer burn, current electric cars are really safe and very secure, more secure than current gasoline cars
The batteries can catch fire, but you’d have to abuse it or damage it a ton in order for that to happen. Nonetheless, I believe they are safer than ICE cars because of the weight of the vehicle preventing it from flying through the air like a ball and the fact they’re less likely to catch fire.
@@CellPhonzRockEnterprises Yes you are totally right, I expressed myself badly at first, car batteries can catch fire, but new cars are really very safe because it almost never happens. Critics of the electric car say that electric cars are exploding, the first electric car marketed had this problem, the first generation of Tesla model S could catch fire after an accident, but it was more than 10 years ago, today research and technology has evolved so much that the risk of fire is extremely rare!
I didn't know Tesla had any median airbags like between seats, and on the frame close to the ceilling... cocoon like. Wow! Must be alien tech. Tesla excells with the highest safety score. 🤯
I'm really impressed how fast those airbags deploy. Deployed in 2 camera frames on average. Then they deflate pretty quick. You don't want to get burnt from a burning hot airbag against you. I was impressed those expensive Porsche cars were tested. Good of Porsche to donate those cars. It's worth the loss to get a good safety rating. For all these brands/models tested. An above average safety rating will sell more cars. Yeah I was baited with the thumbnail pic of the Cybertruck. Closing comment. These tests are all about passenger protection and were done with, (I would describe it), a dry car. So there was no chance of batteries getting damaged resulting in an electrical fire. That kind of testing is someone else's job.
Notice with the pole test, there is only the driver in the front EXCEPT when the car has centre airbags. They probably don't want to show 2 heads banging against each other (or it causes too much damage to their equipment) ?
Bought a byd seagull months ago! A great car for driving around the city, especially because there are several completely free charging stations here in Brazil! The only use for our SUV here at home is for traveling!
I guess that 50% offset must be a Chiense standard on its own then. I thought it was copied from the west where they have two car weight within 90 lbs of each other's curb weight going headone on 50% offset at 40mph. which is more realistic because most car crashes don't drive into a building or some metal boxes but to other cars on the road, and they can survive a car within the same class then they have at least some degrees of extra for a heavier vehicle.
the speed limit on frontal vehicle-to-vehicle crash test should be regulated to 68.3 km/h instead of 50.0 km/h . . . based on real world crash data . . .
I agree this is the actual car interior. That white mark on the steering wheel that LOOKS similar to polestar logo is I think a mark put on by the techs for the test
So, with all of those different EV's crashed in all those different ways, not a single battery fire. It lets you know that EV battery fires are way over-exaggerated. It's simply not a concern.
my bank account after seeing this video wasting millions of dollars and thinking that instead of crashing cars the money could just be transfered into my bank account and would become a millionaire in days lol
Their idea of "good" and mine are completely different based on what I saw from some of the cabin deformity and dummy movement. How can someone being bounced to the passenger side be good? The force throwing them into the passenger is ridiculous.
Good luck in that crash - especially when the battery starts to burn in some cases due to impact. Sometimes they start burning a couple seconds after impact.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
No cyber truck. Clickbait thumb nail. Shame!
No youtube do mesmo jeito se vc pesquisar o crash test do cyber truck ira aparecer 👍
Cyber Truck is the back marker. The result is horrifying.
@@JahongHur not really. Tesla is known for making safe cars. There have already been crashes in the CT and every time the driver/passengers just walked away
@@thedumbconspirator4956nvm i didnt read your full comment
@@2005VolksWagenbeetleAnd Why?
23:14 for those looking for Tesla
Delicious
@@BigWheel.What delicious?
Tezla shit cars..
What’s super crazy is, that Fiat 500 did way better than the average full-size large American car did in the 1960’s and 70’s!
It did far better than almost every car from the pre-airbag 90's.
@@petersargeant1555 True indeed.
ich hab versucht die musik ab minute 19:00 zu finden...ist bei "music used" leider nicht dabei... weiß jemand wo ich die info her bekomme? 🧐
Do you like these crash tests? Note that the previous frontal crash tests were performed at 64 km/h. In these recordings the speed of the cars being tested is 50 km/h. That's a huge difference!
True, after that speed no manufacturer guarantees any survival, most accidents are well above 50 km/h.
the rear-end collision should be included for the test.
@@simontong2954 They don’t include rear-end collisions for obvious reasons
@@aaronlandry3934 which obvious reasons?
@@2005VolksWagenbeetle What do EVs keep in the back that tends to become compromised in a crash? 💥
@@aaronlandry3934 what, the fuel tank? Cause the batteries ain't in the back
@@aaronlandry3934most evs have batteries in the center and they also have a crash absorber protecting them, as well as a safety system that automatically isolates the battery (basically just cutting the power to the battery)
The good thing is, every one of these cars did really well and are great buys as far as safety is concerned.
Are the batteries fully charged?
I really like the Ioniq 6, but the test results don't seem to match up with the potential damage we see in the cabin. 97% seems relatively high considering some of these other cars have airbags that deploy all around the cabin to prevent heads going through the window even for passengers.
2:57 "Me, driving enthusiastically through the crash test: 'It's not going to be anything!' The MG4 EV: 'I think it was more than nothing..."
No Cybertruck!! Clickbait thumb nail!! Shame!!
Stolen womp womp
Bro your pfp is a paw wtf
for anyone wondering, the year of release of the cars crashed by NCAP are the two firs numbers in the code under the NCAP logo.
I was waiting for battery explosion!!! 😂
Do the world a favor and get a brain before your next post. All this EV bashing is pretty lame and - frankly - pretty idiotic.
Battery fires in EVs are actually quite rare. Gas cars are much more likely to burn!
The batteries of electric cars no longer explode and no longer burn, current electric cars are really safe and very secure, more secure than current gasoline cars
The batteries can catch fire, but you’d have to abuse it or damage it a ton in order for that to happen. Nonetheless, I believe they are safer than ICE cars because of the weight of the vehicle preventing it from flying through the air like a ball and the fact they’re less likely to catch fire.
@@CellPhonzRockEnterprises Yes you are totally right, I expressed myself badly at first, car batteries can catch fire, but new cars are really very safe because it almost never happens.
Critics of the electric car say that electric cars are exploding, the first electric car marketed had this problem, the first generation of Tesla model S could catch fire after an accident, but it was more than 10 years ago, today research and technology has evolved so much that the risk of fire is extremely rare!
They all did well. But it's time for EuroNCAP to include small overlap tests like IIHS.
I appreciate how thorough this testing is
0:17 it's Fiat not FLAT
They mean: Flat after the crashtest ...
@automated6225 nope, they called a Fiat a "flat"
Flat is from Chinese version of fiat look at google lmao😂
@NglEditz enough of the nonsense, okay
I envy that person who pushes the button to send the cars meet that obstacle 😂
I'm surprised how safe chinese cars are these days. But I was waiting for that cybertruck to appear 😢
For cybertruck test, they need to install airbags to protect those walls and rams.
Ffgh hhcucsgxgch❤❤❤❤❤
they are safe, but only in chinese euro ncap tests
@@siniyden They are safe everywhere and are the safest cars in the world.
Byd has held up well so props to them
old films, not 2024.
The BYDs were new footage no? 🤷♂️
Some must be 500e is new this year
Good work
I didn't know Tesla had any median airbags like between seats, and on the frame close to the ceilling... cocoon like. Wow! Must be alien tech. Tesla excells with the highest safety score. 🤯
The BYD has it too
@@jamesengland7461 also Toyota
It is obligatory to succeed these tests now, since 2022...
@@EJFJ-Corporation I see. Tx.
Chinese cars have had them for a long time, tesla is so behind.
I will say one thing Teslas cameras can detect when a car is coming straight at you and deploy the airbags
Love it when i smash fly on my camera and airbags deploy
That's true and teslas do pull you into the seat and tries to dodge the crash however in these test all of the sensers are blocked with cameras
Airbags can only be effective if deployed at the right time, premature deployment would make them useless.
@@Trinavara The right time is a fraction of a second BEFORE impact. Tesla can achieve this where others without cameras cannot.
Never notice the particles and gases that come out from the airbag deployment. Interesting. And I haven’t even heard of some of these cars.
Tesla Rules! We have 2 Y’s never going back to ice.
Considering the small size of the 500, it performs extremely well.
I'm really impressed how fast those airbags deploy. Deployed in 2 camera frames on average. Then they deflate pretty quick. You don't want to get burnt from a burning hot airbag against you. I was impressed those expensive Porsche cars were tested. Good of Porsche to donate those cars. It's worth the loss to get a good safety rating. For all these brands/models tested. An above average safety rating will sell more cars.
Yeah I was baited with the thumbnail pic of the Cybertruck.
Closing comment. These tests are all about passenger protection and were done with, (I would describe it), a dry car. So there was no chance of batteries getting damaged resulting in an electrical fire. That kind of testing is someone else's job.
Many of these actually surprised me.
It seems not having an engine in front is not a detriment.
It is a big plus. Would you rather head butt an empty coke can or one full of rocks?
@@camshaftcasting1451empty coke can
Pfff ça met le cyber en vignette et rien dans la vidéo sur celui-ci .
Clickbait 😡🤦🏻♂️
Notice with the pole test, there is only the driver in the front EXCEPT when the car has centre airbags. They probably don't want to show 2 heads banging against each other (or it causes too much damage to their equipment) ?
It’s because EV coverage is heavily biased by EV manufacturers. EVERYTHING is done with the intention of selling more cars
Look at real life crashes involving the car you're talking about
Do good test results encourage less careful driving ?
I feel so sorry for crash test dummies when I watch these sequences
FLAT 500e?
How did you misspell Fiat?
How is it that the EV @ 10:23 has an exhaust pipe?
Chinese cars improvement over the past few years are amazing.
Still wouldnt buy one.
Bought a byd seagull months ago! A great car for driving around the city, especially because there are several completely free charging stations here in Brazil! The only use for our SUV here at home is for traveling!
50kph hit into the wall is not modern test
@@siniyden Do you have any idea how Euro NCAP perform Their crash tests?
5:30 BYD ATTO 3
I like this series 🔥🔥🔥
Didnt include the volvo Evs in the crash test. Must be scared lol
Back seats need side airbags too especially for vulnerable children to protect the side of the bodies.
I love cybertruck
Are the batteries in the car when they do this?
BYD for the win, tbh! and the center consol airbag between the driver and passenger is something that all cars should have, in my opinion!
Most do but it only deploys if there is someone in the passenger seat. You can see that not all tests had a front passenger.
What do you mean worst? None of the EVs you show revealed bad results.
I guess that 50% offset must be a Chiense standard on its own then. I thought it was copied from the west where they have two car weight within 90 lbs of each other's curb weight going headone on 50% offset at 40mph. which is more realistic because most car crashes don't drive into a building or some metal boxes but to other cars on the road, and they can survive a car within the same class then they have at least some degrees of extra for a heavier vehicle.
1 diislike because of the cybertruck in the thumbnail
Cars with back seats should have airbags to deploy from the back of the front seats for the rear passengers.
There's really no big need of that since there's nothing substantial in front of them to hit.
Do these cars have fully charged batteries and did any catch fire within a month?
Good thing about fuel powered cars they stop trying to move after a crash unlike electric 2:01
No explosion! No Cybertruck! 😂
yeah. i drive model s
the speed limit on frontal vehicle-to-vehicle crash test should be regulated to 68.3 km/h instead of 50.0 km/h . . . based on real world crash data . . .
Czy to prawda że te testy są bez baterii robione i zastępują je takim samym ciężarem?
Ionic ❤
"Small overlap front: Good"
23:35 : see the back of the child head hitting the car's interior falling off after the impact.
Doubt.
😂
Guod jób
You made mistake in this video for the Renault e scenic, sometimes you show the e megane and not the e scenic
What is the speed ?
When I was first watching The video I thought they was gonna explode the car😂 15:10 this was my time when I messaged This
The cars: 😕 the music: 😍😌
Chinese not bad, and Tesla very good!
Where are the Volvo tests??
❤
後発のテスラが伝統を抑えてワンツーフィニュシュすげー
I like Polestar.
TATA - 5 Star ❤
Tata doesnt even have a ev
+ europeans doesnt even buy a tata anyways
0 star
04:28 isn't a Ioniq 5. Looks Like a polestar to me. Baaad mistake!
Well hate to break it to you…it’s actually the interior of the Ioniq 5
I agree this is the actual car interior. That white mark on the steering wheel that LOOKS similar to polestar logo is I think a mark put on by the techs for the test
So, with all of those different EV's crashed in all those different ways, not a single battery fire. It lets you know that EV battery fires are way over-exaggerated. It's simply not a concern.
1,7,19 - 🏆.
2- не показали последний тест!? Почему?
Waiting for the cybertruck turn and i am out of luck.
And none of them caught on fire
The rolling chassis didn't know what hit it with the benz eq series 🤡
Clickbait-no Cybertruck!
Vinfast❤❤❤
my bank account after seeing this video wasting millions of dollars and thinking that instead of crashing cars the money could just be transfered into my bank account and would become a millionaire in days lol
In purosange?
I was waiting for battery
The floor has no grip like on a real road . The tests are mostly designed to give a predetermined result
I’m not convinced with the results of some of the cars as shown eg. Toyota BRZ4x
the rating of different tests for different cars is not representative
Sunroof is dangerous when it happens crash😮😮
Evidence would dispute that - a lot of these 5 star rated cars have full sunroofs which cause no issues in the crash tests.
4:11 good???
Why is the Fiat 500 labeled as the "Flat 500"?
They could not test the Cybertruck because it destroyed their equipment.
Nitido is the one
Where is cybertruck???(
No tesla cybertruck 😢?
I ride a motorbike so don't care about safety, but nice my Tesla is safest for my family 😅
I have 3 EV's and 2 of them were not in this video. I thought they would be but never mind.
which ones do you have?
tesla 98% safety assist? damn im in the 2%
NO CYBERTRUCK IN THE VIDEO???😢😢😢
Model 3???? Model x ?????
Not a very accurate ranking. Also, the Toyota and the Lexus are the same car, yet ranked very differently in this video
Dishonest with the Cybertruck
No Nissan ariya?
No Cybertruck. Clickbait
Their idea of "good" and mine are completely different based on what I saw from some of the cabin deformity and dummy movement. How can someone being bounced to the passenger side be good? The force throwing them into the passenger is ridiculous.
Hence the reason you should buy a car with airbags BETWEEN the passengers (like the Tesla and BYD)
I have the mondels
Good luck in that crash - especially when the battery starts to burn in some cases due to impact. Sometimes they start burning a couple seconds after impact.
Encap was revised in 2023. Since then, there has been no Tesla. To celebrate American products, you took results from 2022. Good try!
Place 9 VW id4 It's a mistake
cliff notes:#1 tesla model S. #2 tesla model Y. the end.
What if the car is so strong the wall breaks instead of the car