I love the idea of less smooth/ more varied torque in the engines firing sequence. I'm seeing a few people not understanding the concept of a big bang engine, which is to create momentary lapses in torque between the firing of the cylinders so that you can lose grip around corners or on straightaways when the vehicle is at its limit, have the power come down for a split second to gain traction, and then do this repeatedly as a sort of gradient of grip as opposed to everything having grip until it doesn't and that's game over.
Kawasaki singlehandledly proved this concept of traction wrong with their failed big bang engine. This was right before Yamaha publicly explained to the world with their _long bang_ M1 what was actually going on. Nice to see the old Honda smoke and mirrors has still left some people thoroughly disoriented, though. Honda runs their own version of the long bang engine today, btw, but with the old two stroke screamer firing intervals. Gotta keep em guessing.
Interesting that you went the simultaneous ignitions route with this. It'll run with even firing intervals as well. Arguably it's the engine Porsche should have made. Their flat 16 would have been more feasible as a crossplane, too.
@@sarbakara7469 Porsche most likely doubled their flat eights, which were true boxers. The 8s already had vibration issues. Coventry Climax used flat plane cranks, as two flat eights joined together. The slip joint in the middle of them kept, um, _slipping_ due 8 pistons starting and stopping at the exact opposite time to the other 8...
@@identiticrisis in this sim the boxer versions of the V10 and V8 sound smoother, even though they have the same firing order and firing interval, and listened to civics with UEL headers and they don't sound as good as a boxer4, the boxer 4s with EL headers sound very well even if they are NA, but maybe it's the eacape system, I could only find a video of a boxee 4 EL headers, straingth pipe, single exit exhaust and it sounds good, maybe I underestimated the impact of the balance of an engine on its exhaust sound, such you see that's why the GT350 has such a strange signal, although that video that makes me think only lasts 9 seconds m.ua-cam.com/video/pH-AxIQ2AsM/v-deo.html
@@sarbakara7469 the exhaust sounds are down to whoever made the engine in the sim, not the sim itself. It's perfectly capable of reflecting all those different sounds, just most people don't know how.
I've been seriously thinking about this idea exactly. Been thinking the audi i5 firing sequence and the GM lt6 flat plane v8 bore and stroke 104.25 x 80 mm or use the bore stroke ratio of the CBR 1000 rr and go 104.25 x 62.5 mm for either a 9000 or 12000 rpm 25 m/s piston speed
708-HP with 847(ft-lb.)-TQ@4000-RPM from 4.2L? And damn-nearly 10k redline?! Man... if it weren't for the volumetric efficiency being unnaturally high (For an N/A engine) I'd say automakers have been doing it wrong for YEARS!
actually it doesn't have 120NM/L of torque the same as the ferrari 458, it's just that this engine keeps it up to the red line, I guess because it doesn't have catalytic converters
This is pretty much half a BRM H16, that engine is also big bang but flat-plane instead: i1.wp.com/1gai.ru/uploads/posts/2015-12/thumbs/1449253300_british-racing-motors-type-75-v-16-engine-diagram-photo-370779-s-986x603-876x535.jpg
They developed and raced a true 16 separate ignition version as well, the cranks having 45 degree split pins. Each of the four banks still effectively fired as distinct flat plane 4s. Unfortunately it did not fix their vibration issues. The crossplane crank would have...
sounds like my car after I beat the engine block with a sledgehammer
Das Auto
CLARKSON!!!
@@lordofrims HAAAAAMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNDD!
I love the idea of less smooth/ more varied torque in the engines firing sequence. I'm seeing a few people not understanding the concept of a big bang engine, which is to create momentary lapses in torque between the firing of the cylinders so that you can lose grip around corners or on straightaways when the vehicle is at its limit, have the power come down for a split second to gain traction, and then do this repeatedly as a sort of gradient of grip as opposed to everything having grip until it doesn't and that's game over.
you can even see it in the dyno graph
Kawasaki singlehandledly proved this concept of traction wrong with their failed big bang engine. This was right before Yamaha publicly explained to the world with their _long bang_ M1 what was actually going on.
Nice to see the old Honda smoke and mirrors has still left some people thoroughly disoriented, though.
Honda runs their own version of the long bang engine today, btw, but with the old two stroke screamer firing intervals. Gotta keep em guessing.
Sounds like someone throwing a bag full of rusty paint cans down the side of a mountain. I'll take two.
Porsche is typing...
"Write that down ! Write that down !"
Interesting that you went the simultaneous ignitions route with this. It'll run with even firing intervals as well. Arguably it's the engine Porsche should have made. Their flat 16 would have been more feasible as a crossplane, too.
So the flat 16 were 2 V8 flat plane engines?
@@sarbakara7469 Porsche most likely doubled their flat eights, which were true boxers. The 8s already had vibration issues.
Coventry Climax used flat plane cranks, as two flat eights joined together. The slip joint in the middle of them kept, um, _slipping_ due 8 pistons starting and stopping at the exact opposite time to the other 8...
@@identiticrisis in this sim the boxer versions of the V10 and V8 sound smoother, even though they have the same firing order and firing interval, and listened to civics with UEL headers and they don't sound as good as a boxer4, the boxer 4s with EL headers sound very well even if they are NA, but maybe it's the eacape system, I could only find a video of a boxee 4 EL headers, straingth pipe, single exit exhaust and it sounds good, maybe I underestimated the impact of the balance of an engine on its exhaust sound, such you see that's why the GT350 has such a strange signal, although that video that makes me think only lasts 9 seconds m.ua-cam.com/video/pH-AxIQ2AsM/v-deo.html
@@sarbakara7469 the exhaust sounds are down to whoever made the engine in the sim, not the sim itself. It's perfectly capable of reflecting all those different sounds, just most people don't know how.
@@identiticrisisso that boxer 10 might have perfectly gotten the screaming sound of a V10, and that boxer 8 might have sounded different
That engine does NOT sound happy...
You've gone from terrible marine engines, to terrible sports car engines. I love it!
Can you do a flat 10? It's a configuration I've thought about too much. Who cares about the crank.
okay
I've been seriously thinking about this idea exactly. Been thinking the audi i5 firing sequence and the GM lt6 flat plane v8 bore and stroke 104.25 x 80 mm or use the bore stroke ratio of the CBR 1000 rr and go 104.25 x 62.5 mm for either a 9000 or 12000 rpm 25 m/s piston speed
Definitely sounds like a Big Bang V4 or in-line 4
Definitely sounds like a crossplane I4, big bang V4's sound more like a twin
Ah, yes. If Porsche went NASCAR.
that is an _interesting_ firing order
that is an *interesting* exhaust graph
Something tells me it’s not an in-line 2.
It is, it's just one of those mutant inline 2's.
at idle it kind of sounds like a 5.7 hemi ram 1500 modified exhaust
Nice sound!!!
now thats what i call a straight 8 engine
send me your subaru blocks folks, I'll build this one
maybe the worst sound from engine simulator i heard
i love it
Now do a 72° V8 with 72° Crank throws and a V10 based Firing order, lets see what it sounds like
How about boxer 8?
Sure
REally interesting
Hi man can you please make 4stroke 8.6L V12?
Sounds like Niki Lauda’s F1 car
I like how when he revs the "engine" his fps drop 💀
That sounds so angry
sounds like a volkswagen/audi 4.2L v8 if it bumped uglies with a yamaha 4 cylinder
I guess I need to Google just what tf "big bang" means for an engine.
This seems like just a flat-8 at first.
Mfw 250% volumetric efficiency
Oppoused piston engine please
sounds like a V10
Power curve is not optimal I have to say :D
Unless you had a CVT set to a 5000 RPM stall.
what the fuck 2l fuel
it simulates fuel consumption
I'd have one
708-HP with 847(ft-lb.)-TQ@4000-RPM from 4.2L? And damn-nearly 10k redline?! Man... if it weren't for the volumetric efficiency being unnaturally high (For an N/A engine) I'd say automakers have been doing it wrong for YEARS!
actually it doesn't have 120NM/L of torque the same as the ferrari 458, it's just that this engine keeps it up to the red line, I guess because it doesn't have catalytic converters
I hate these people throwing together trashy big bang engines that sound nothing like an 8 cyl
i bet you put pineapple on pizza dont you
@@Chillin4030 no this person puts banana on pizza, pinapple is fine when paired with ham. this person is just a cock womble
Nascar
These are no shitposts...
This is pretty much half a BRM H16, that engine is also big bang but flat-plane instead: i1.wp.com/1gai.ru/uploads/posts/2015-12/thumbs/1449253300_british-racing-motors-type-75-v-16-engine-diagram-photo-370779-s-986x603-876x535.jpg
They developed and raced a true 16 separate ignition version as well, the cranks having 45 degree split pins. Each of the four banks still effectively fired as distinct flat plane 4s.
Unfortunately it did not fix their vibration issues. The crossplane crank would have...