The Bizarre World of Quantum Physics
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 кві 2024
- The most important confusion that people have with Quantum Physics is that they don't realise that the indeterminacy and uncertainty of the quantum world does not negate the determinacy and certainly of the macroscopic world. The implications of this observation are that Quantum Physics cannot be used to argue the case that causation does not exist at the macroscopic level.
You summarized my study of physics from class 9 to class 12.
Aj saari baatein smjh aagy.
Thank You Sir. ❤
آاپ کے ان ولاگز نے علم و دانش کو ایک نیا انداز دیا ہے۔ بہت اعلیٰ۔ داکٹر صاحب!
I'm a physics student ✨
Ap humary area my A gye hain 🫣 ab maza aye ga jb hum apky area my aty hain to hum bohat darr darr k rehty hain k kiya chal rha hai 🫣🫣🫣but ab my popcorn kha k dekho ga apki video 😁
I love Physics. But this is actually a video about the philosophical implications of Quantum physics.
@@Taimur_LaalThought-provoking video❣️❣️❣️,
You've skillfully unraveled the philosophical implications of quantum physics, leaving me pondering the nature of reality. Your insights are invaluable, and I look forward to more explorations of the mind-bending connections between physics and philosophy!😍
Many science dropouts fall in the lap of economics political science!
@@Taimur_Laal hyyyyyyyy love you sooo much sir g... InshaAllah ap ko hug krni hai jb bhi kbhi zindagi my apsy mila ❤️💖✨my apko 9th class se sunta a rha hun or ab mera master complete hony wala ha...
The best way to understand what Quantum Physics is listening to Deepak Chopra
Atleast you will understand what Quantum physics isn't, after listening to him.
Apologies to all Deepak Chopra lovers.
Can you give short summary in 2, 3 lines of his views?
Yes! Prof. Taimur is NOT the only genius. Deepak Choora is Indian genius. Taimur removed my comments where I praised him profusely. Same Muslim v. Hindu outlook in The Unconscious of mind! 😃
@@mohinderkumar7298 dear Mohinder, it's not about India vs Pakistan or Muslims vs Hindus. We all are here to learn from one another. When i posted my first comment, I could not imagine in my wildest dreams that it would be taken in that way. Hope it clarifies n let's listen to pure logic which has no boundaries. I sincerely hope that it clarifies.
In my opinion it is really a concerned and sincere effort to give individual input to the system and society "local and global as well".
Fascinating video❤❤❤
Your clarity and passion for quantum physics are inspiring. As a researcher, I appreciate your ability to break down complex concepts. Keep sharing your insights and igniting curiosity!
Its always amazing to know unkowable.
You are targeting my core curiosities. Love it
This is a great way to show the fundamental differences in confused understanding of science and scientific understanding of science. Taimur has done a phenomenal job in positioning this fundamental dilemma. Finally we can clearly see that “ World and matter is certainly knowable”
Problem is how he will explain meta physical world.
ادھر تیمور صاحب نے پھنس جانا، سارے فلسفی ادھر ہی تو پھنسے۔
Thought-provoking video❣️❣️❣️,
Dr. Taimur Rahman! You've skillfully unraveled the philosophical implications of quantum physics, leaving me pondering the nature of reality. Your insights are invaluable, and I look forward to more explorations of the mind-bending connections between physics and philosophy!😍
Kindly make more videos on quantum physis ....we love, and Comperetively understand more from your lectures then any typical physics teacher
Wonderful attempt! Simplifying complex scientific theories. Please make a series of contemporary science and interrelationship of biological, physical and mathematical sciences
One of my all time favourites since my school days. Now i have a Political Science background. i can watch videos on Quantum Physics for hours and hours and hours.. ❤❤
So good to see you on speaking on QP
Thanks for taking up science topics too. You have a unique ability to make complex information simple. I call you the First Teacher of the current Muslim world a la Aristotle in the medieval Islamicate world. 😇Could you please make a few more videos to explain this topic in more depth and other subjects in physics that were in the works during the early twentieth century, say up to 1935? Thank you.
Great job Mr Taimur, I have leaned a lot from you.
My basic framework of understanding about free will. Free will and determinism has long been debated and still no consensus philosophically, however, the recent scientific theories seem to point definitively towards consciousness and the essential role of free will.
I like to give just a brief overview of how our brain works to understand and make sense of the the things in the outer world.
We have five main senses, they convey crude data to different concerning areas of the brain where this crude information is processed and goes to other association areas of the brain where further processing occurs and once a holistic picture is formed, brain interpret it according. At that time we become conscious of whatever we perceived. These different cognitive and neural processed occur at our subconscious level. Our brain then takes necessary action which determines our behaviour. For example, when I see my cat, I only become conscious of it after my brain goes through lots of processes subconsciously first. The signals go to primary visual centre where just the lines and sketches are perceived, then it goes to secondary visual areas where further processing occur, the it goes to association area which gets information from my memory area, then some emotional value is attached to it and I then become aware of a cat which is white and brown, it is my pet and there are happy emotions attached to it and lift her in my lap ( my behaviour). Where, how and why we become conscious science so far is not able to give us an answer.
The classical physics (Newtonian) says that all the atoms, particles have there fixed place they move around and we determine their future movement by knowing the current position, velocity etc, so everything is deterministic and all the brain processes being physical also deterministic and consciousness is nothing but the emergent property of the brain processes and does not have any causal role and free will is an illusion.
Quantum theory, being the most successful one, says there is no discrete atoms and their orbits, they don’t have any definitive place and movements. The are just the probabilities waves, a potentiality which only becomes actualised once someone consciously measure them. So making something happen is dependent of what someone chooses. If a physicist decides to measure the radioactive decay of an atom, he will set up a apparatus accordingly, his choice to do that very experiment is totally free, he could chose to measure some other property. According to this theory, his choice is free as no physical law can determine this. Then nature gives its response randomly so either the radioactive particles will decay in that period or not. But this response from nature is not totally random but there are some statistical rules to it. So new physics gives lot of evidence in favour of some free will.
Recent neuroscience, by using fMRI (scan of the brain while it’s doing a certain job) also supports free will by providing evidence that we also have an in built mechanism for suppressing, ignoring or overriding its initial response. In case of strong emotions, anger, fear there is increased activity in amygdala but after half a second this activity is decreasing and strong activity is seem in our frontal area suggesting a reverse mechanism so we calm down instead of responding back aggressively.
Very nicely sunmarized professor sahab. Keep em coming. A comrade from India ❤
yar thori science videos banayen these topics are sooo interesting.. thanks for educating us in a fun manner best wishesss
Thanks for doing this!! ❤
The world of quantum physics has always fascinated me. This is itself thought-provoking that whenever it comes to cosmos, on macro scale predictability and discovery with scientific accuracy is evident. But on micro scale, like atom, uncertainty rules. Without conscious observation a particle acts like wave but when concious observation applies, it acts like a particle. This phenomena opens up debate on conscious observation with respect to physical reality. Interestingly, islam has references about it like in aytul kursi, Allah is the ultimate observer. Further, in Judaism text, there is a reference of observer effect when prophet Musa talks to Allah. Great Ashfaq Ahmed sahab also wrote about quantum physics in his iconic series Man chalay ka soda where firdous jamal and khayam sarhadi engages in a eye opening conversation on quantum physics. In short, it's been a century since quantum physics continues to baffle scientific community. Indeed there is a lot to unearth.
But quantum physics is still physical world although some of its theory is unknown yet.
کوانٹم فزکس کے قوانین اور تھیوری جب پتہ چل بھی جائے گی تب بھی یہ فیزیکل دنیا ہی رہے گی۔
مسئلہ تو metaphysical دنیا کا ہے۔ کیا اس دنیا میں قوانین ہوتے اور اسکی تھیوری کیا ہے؟ کیا کبھی ہم اس مابعدالطبیعیات دنیا کے بارے میں جان سکتے؟ مادہ اور انرجی کیسے بن جاتے؟ LHC تجربے سے کچھ نہ ملا۔ ہن کیہ کرئیے۔
سارے فلسفی میٹا فزکس کی دنیا میں ہی پھنستے، کوئی کچھ کہتا کوئی کچھ۔ اب تیمور صاحب بھی وہیں پھنسیں گے۔
How world is created from nothingness? What is nothingness? All philosophies stuck here.
Sir, geee zabardast lecture ❤
But you could have quoted Neil Bohr's riposte to Albert Einstein. God doesn't play dice . The lecture was immaculate
Thnx for making this type of videos❤
Amazing Explanation of theory and law
We studied all these things in Metric and FSC but just blindly and crammed these for milking grades !
But after your lecture we got the reality check and real implications of these theories in wider perspective, That's great of you !
Fascinating Discourse
زبردست ❤
Ooo most awaited video❤
Absolutely amazing video ❤❤❤
Ap bht thek direction my ja rhy. In the short we are creators of our life
Very nice video.... But you've missed Bell's experiment on EPR paradox... This is something that disproved Einstein's view.
I’ve skimmed over Einstein’s attempts without going into the details of his arguments or refutations.
Thanks Sir: difficult concepts make it easy for us.
I would recommend Dr. Taimur and anyone interested to read "Existential Physics" by Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder. In that book, she debunks many philosophical ideas which were a result of the indeterminacy in quantum physics.
In short, quantum physics is missing some links between the fundamental forces of universe. For example, in the classical mechanics, there is a law of gravitation. Similarly, there must be a law to describe the relation of the quantum particles with gravity, but there isn't. It's a matter of experimentation and observation using more advanced equipment and we can derive these laws one by one for the quantum world. When we have those laws, nothing will remain undetermined. This is the view of many scientists. And as has happened always in the history of human thought, there is countless opposition to this view by "theorists" who claim objectivity in their own right.
How matter and energy are created at first place from nothingness. Cause and effect chain disappears at nothingness. Quantum physics is still physical world, not opening door to metaphysics.
How nothingness creates something?
This is the point where every philosopher and scientist is stunned, and could not proceed further.
یہاں ہونا نہ ہونا ہے، نہ ہونا عین ہونا ہے
@@saimch.9388 You are right, that scientists do not know how energy can come from nothingness. But in my opinion quantum physics should not be the science which opens doors to metaphysics as it is assumed by many philosophers nowadays to do so.
The fact that scientists can't explain creation from nothingness is enough to deductively conclude the possibility of a metaphysical reality. And we shouldn't really use quantum mechanics to deduce things which aren't implied in the physics to begin with.
@@thoughtyfalcon3991 So the point is neither particle physics (LHC, higgs boson etc) and quantum physics can measure creation from nothing.
In other words, physics and physical devices cannot measure nothings, they can only detect matter and energy when they come in physical form.
So we are standing at the point that how to look into nothingness (spiritual world, عالم امر عالم ناسوت etc), from where matter energy is actually created at first place.
So door to metaphysics is closed for physics. Then how to reach to God which is metaphysical?
So whole debate ends at that point or say, new debate starts at that point.
As muslims, we believe on God which is metaphysical, which is creator of physical things. He is everywhere in physical world too.
So conclusion, there is no conclusion.
@@saimch.9388 I must confess I don't quite understand your point. We are not supposed to reach God through physics, nor is it the objective of physics.
Quantum physics matters for certain philosophical implications such as the presence or absence of free will, the fundamental building blocks of consciousness in the brain and if all matter is at some level conscious or not.
These debates have nothing to do with God at the outset.
If you look at quantum physics or judge it on the basis of whether it can reach God or not, then your judgement is sure to be faulty. Because this is not the goal of physics at all.
@@thoughtyfalcon3991 So we can not reach to God through science, we should learn something different or superior from science because Muslims do all the efforts to reach to God, all Sufis do this.
یہی ایک سوچ تو مسلمانوں کی سائنس میں زوال کی وجہ ہے۔ جب سائنس سے خدا نہیں ملنا تو کیوں پڑھیں۔جانے والی
سمجھ تو ککھ نئیں آتی مجھ نالائق کو لیکن بولتے ہوئے بڑے مزے کے لگتے ہیں آپ 😊
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
بہت اچھا اور آسان سمجھایا۔ اس سے زیادہ آسان میں نے آج تک نہیں سنا
😂
Her insan Kay ander ability hoti hai apnay ander chupi ability ko pehchano .. koi bhi nalaik ne hota
انہوں نے نہ خود سمجھا ہے نہ سمجھا سکھے ۔
Thanks to Einstein for his rebuttal against Quantum mechanics. If he had not raised such questions about quantum mechanical interpretation of reality, no one would have understood quantum mechanics so elegantly.
Thanks a lot sir❤
Nice Sir 👍
Interesting lecture. Please recommend some books to study and try to understand the world of Quantum Physics.
بہترین
Love it Sir 😍💞
ایسی ویڈیوز بناتے رہیئے گا
بلھے شاہ نے یہی بات بہت پہلے اپنی نظم
بلہے کی جاناں میں کون
میں کہی تھی
assalamualaikum, please can you recommend books you read for this topic
Our composition is basically dual, physical body with some sort of spiritual entity. The problem with science is its current methodology- it only takes reality which is physical, which can be perceived, seem, smelt and be reduced. As you did whole video on quantum physics, I like to mention Pauli, the noble price winner, one of the founders of quantum physics, Einstein would call him his “spiritual son”, he himself was not satisfied, like many others, about the picture of reality current physics tried to explain. For him reality is half “irrational”, by that he meant physical reality, determined by the current scientific methods, is not the complete picture of reality, part of the full reality likely to be metaphysical.
And no one can explain metaphysics because it is beyond senses and physical boundaries. So reality can not be found ever.
@@saimch.9388 no, that’s not the case, I think. All the prophets, their immediate followers and saints of all the time told us, through revelation and through their highest wisdom, what the other side of reality so we can have a complete picture. The problem is that we don’t pay any heed to them. But sticking to the current scientific methodology, we won’t be able to know the complete picture of reality.
@@muhammadmohsin1021 ok so Prophethood (wahi) is the connection between physical and metaphysical world, and now that door of wahi is closed after Prophet Muhammad (SAW). That message is last and final. We have to find the reality in the light of that message (Quran).
Conclusion: we can never reach to metaphysical world through particle, quantum etc type of physics.
Kindly make more videos on science
ٹھیک ہے اگر ڈاکٹر حود بھووئی سائینس دان ہوتے ہوئے ہسٹری اور پولیٹکس پر بات کر سکتے ہیں اور کتابیں لکھ سکتے ہیں تو ڈاکٹر تیمور رحمان بھی فلاسفی پالیٹکس اور ہسٹری کو سائنٹیفک بنیاد پر ایکسپلین کر سکتے ہیں۔ ویل ڈن ڈاکٹر تیمور رحمان۔ ویل ڈن ڈاکٹر حوود بھوئی
😂😂😂😂
It was an interesting lecture. However, I think your distinction between theory and law is categorically incorrect. You equate law to an equation (or relation) and a theory to an explanation. While the law analogy is acceptable, the theory one is not.
First of all science is a study of 'how' and not 'why'. Thus a theory is a model (not reality) that explains something reductively in some other unexplained assumptions. All theories have a resolution in their 'how' explanations. Consider the case of gravitation that you cited.
The universal law of gravitation posits the existence of a force between objects which could be computed using a simple equation (the inverse square law). However, it does not explain why this force exists.
Now consider, the general theory of relativity, it models gravitation as curvature of spacetime (modeled as a metric tensor). It also provides equations to compute forces between objects instead of positing a force, it posits a curved spacetime. Once could derive the universal law of gravitation using the field equations of general relativity. But is it the ultimate explanation? It is not. It certainly has more explanatory power (resolution under its own assumptions) than newton's universal gravitation but it cannot explain its own assumptions (i.e why spacetime bends in presence of matter).
Thus the difference between the two models is the resolution of explanations under their assumptions. Both of these models could be an approximation of some other model that might have different assumptions and thus explains general relativity more simply (like loop quantum gravity or other emergent spacetime theories) plus some phenomenon beyond the reach of general relativity.
Thus, all laws + theories are essentially models of explanations under unexplained assumptions, that fit the empirical data better and better until new anomalies emerge that challenge the predictions of the model. Empirical reality under various constraints and within the explanatory limits of an explaining model, behaves as if the models were true - making models (and therefore laws and theories) approximate truth. But we know the models are not true because there exist phenomenon or extremes where the models don't make sense.
An interesting question is that if there really exists a representable model that can completely explain all phenomenon (i.e the 'how' of the phenomenon). Which is kind of completely on faith (and induction I suppose), where we are assuming that the regularities of the world can be comprehended by the human mind using language and representation.
I achieved a 99% score in my physics and chemistry exams. However, these concepts often puzzle me without explanation. I used to wonder why we study these seemingly irrelevant scientific minutiae, but today, you have clarified my concepts. You make me feel blessed and happy. Even after listening to just half of your lecture, I eagerly rushed to the comment section to pay homage to you, dear sir. You are a gem. Believe me, you are a blessing for humanity. You embody the true essence of intellect in Pakistan. Truly an intellectual, you deserve 100 million subscribers. Many prayers, love, and respect to you.❤❤
Thank you. Please help me get to one million subscribers.
Newton ne masses r gravitation k sath relate kiya r Einstein ne bending of space time graph r gravitation ko relate kiya
سر میں نے انڈیا پاکستان کے اکثر دانشوروں کو سنا ہے آپ ان سب میں ممتاز ہیں اور اس ملک کا سرمایہ ہیں❤
If I am not mistaken, physics has 2 branches , first particle physics , 2nd experimental physics. Theory and law are part of part of particle physics, if someone watched latest movie about atom bomb, Oppenheimer, This concept is explained
By the way Dr Sb , one video about Oppenheimer will be highly appreciated
If you had discussed tunneling effect, it would have been more fun.
What an exciting video! In the quest for truth, I hope we’re close to eliminating this contradiction i.e. the unification of the four forces with String Theory (M Theory to be precise). It will clear up the chaos with its holographic concepts of implicit and explicit orders
One lecture on quantum quantum entanglement as well please
We want series of quantum physics 💛
Sir jo scientist kahty dunia smgh sa bahir ha unko scientist q kahengy?
Worl is knowable, but it will take time to discover
Enjoyable lecture
Want more videos on this topic
Beautiful
Uncertainty/unpredictability is minuscle at bigger scales. When you're sitting on a chair, there's an uncertainty in your position. However, it's so small that we cannot measure or feel it. Uncertainties are usually of the order 10^-34 m. Quantum mechanics is completely compatible with classical mechanics. We don't need to consider uncertainties when we are dealing with bigger scales because they are negligible. Uncertainties show up at quantum level just because the scale is smaller.
You may look for Ehrenfest Theorem.
Problem is not how quantum mechanics work. Problem is how the quantum world change into classic world.
Cheeta cheeta Prof cheeta .
mene dekha sir aj quantum physics per lecture hai toh dekhna toh zaroor pady ga
Nice video
Thanks 😂
I have NEET exam on 5th May and you uploaded video today @ 27 April 2024 ❤
# 10:19 PM
moreeeee videos like these plssssss💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
Sir dil mange more☺☺
Good change ❤
Sir inqalab from the book shelf is hidden in this vedio.
Its a, measurement problem. Its NOT the observer collapsing wave function of particle to act as particle. When we measure substomic level particles,,,,, we depend on light photons which thelselves are, massless particles . As photons hit that subatomic particle it pushes and changes, its pisition........ GOT IT..... MEASUREMENT PROBLEM NOT OBSERVER OR CONSCIOUSNESS MAKING IT TO ACT AS PARTICLE
Jb science ka knowledge na hu aur jb aap zyda vele hn tu science mai na aya krei
Fazool tareen video
Quantum Physics is absolutely a interesting topic.❤
Part 2?
Quantum ki calculation classical m valid rhten qk quantum formalism general ha lekin classical calculation quantum p nh lgten
Quantum mechanics me ab tk String theory sb se famous Mani jati he us k baary me ap ny Kuch ni btaya
اسے کون دیکھ سکتا، کہ یگانہ ہے وہ یکتا
جو دوئی کی بو بھی ہوتی، تو کہیں دو چار ہوتا!
Sir ap tu mre domain m aa gaye😂😂😂
Ma na economics bht seekhi ha or philosophy hlank k physics k students in chezon ko koi tesri dunia ki chez smghty han🌹
تیمور صاحب theory اور law کے بارے میں آپ کی وضاحت درست نہیں ہے. اس کی وجہ شاید یہ ہے کہ آپ science کی basics سے ناواقف ہیں. Scientific theory کسی phenomenon کی logical explanation ہے لیکن اس کی mathematical explanation موجود نہیں ہوتی یعنی اس کی کوئی Mathematical equation نہیں ہوتی. لیکن جب اس کی mathematical equation بن جاتی ہے تو اب اس کی بنیاد پر prediction کرنا ممکن ہو جاتا ہے. اب یہ scientific theory اپ گریڈ ہو کر scientific law بن جاتا ہے. یعنی law کی درستگی کی سطح theory سے کافی بلند ہو جاتی ہے. اب تمام scientist اس کو مان لیتے ہیں. اس لحاظ سے آپ کا یہ کہنا غیر سائنسی ہے کہ law پہلے آتا ہے اور اس کی theory بعد میں آتی ہے. ایسا نہیں ہے theory ہمیشہ پہلے آتی ہے اور اگر اس کی mathematical explanation مل جائے تو پھر وہ اس کی درستگی کی سطح بڑھ جاتی ہے اور اب اسے law کہنے لگتے ہیں
Bai, Kia wo ye Nahi kehta K law baad me aur theory pehle hote ha..baki ap Key BAAT K theory predict Nahi krte ghalat ha blke hypothesis b predict krta ha..malaria ke example dekh le.
Wese Jo sir b bata rahe ha darust ha
Wrong information disclaimer!
ChatGPT hi kr lo
Taimur Sb nay bilkul drust explain Kiya hay , law and theory ko ...yeah ek common misconception hay K theory develop ho K la Banti hay Jo science may bilkul Galat bat hay,,,, science may or common world may theory ka matlab different hay....inshort,,na Kisi theory say law Banti hay,,,or na law say theory Banti hay,,,, law theory ka wo portion hay jis ko ham experimentally verify karsaktay hay....theory K pass ziyada information Hoti hay law K muqabilay may....
Quantum Computing could help to explain it ?! Isn’t it sir
Please shed light on this aspect as well
Actually exact word which Einstein used for quantum entanglement is ; spooky!!!
Respected Professor, Pleased to inform you that Dr Bashir Uddin Mehmood has written valuable books with complete knowledge of Physics and Islam. Mr Uxi Mufti has written a book Allah ( is really difficult book on Philosophy and Physics) . Maybe more books. Both writers books are really enlightenment.
Sir ap Special Theory m any ka b irada rkhty han?😂
وا جی وا۔
At Quantum level, our body atoms don’t die, they just change form. So we don’t die, our body atoms just change from one type of energy to another type of energy. This iis comforting to know that after death our energy still stay in this universe. Well if it is true then energy can change its form again . I think that’s what Islam and other religions says as well
Does atoms ever die at any level?
Why the name Quantum?
I believe purpose of science to conquer the nature
When I first learnt about the mysteries of subatomic world, how particles can behave as having a mass and then mysteriously as waves, and then learnt about the double slit experiment and that there was a noble prize awaiting for someone to solve the mysteries, I was deeply fascinated. Just by observing the behaviour of particles you influence their behaviour. It seems madness.
I agree with your summary that quantum world is still a newish science hence why we haven’t yet been able to explain these behaviours.
What I was always annoyed about was how dare us Muslims would separate science from religion when religion tells you that the creator you worship is the creator who made all the universe including the laws that govern its behaviour, so then why wouldn’t you try to ponder and contemplate upon the creation of our creator ?
Also, I think the Quran talks about two kinds of ilm’s. Ilmulghaib and ilmushhahadah. What we can observe with our rational and intellectual faculties and one that we can’t.
Whereas the creator is the ‘aalim’ of both. Aalimul ghaib wa Aalimush shahadah!
کہا
نبی کریم ﷺ نے جب سورج غروب ہوا
تو ان سے پوچھا کہ تم کو معلوم ہے?
یہ سورج کہاں جاتا ہے ؟
میں نے عرض کی کہ اللہ اور اس کے رسول ہی کو علم ہے ۔ آپ ﷺ نے فرمایا
کہ یہ جاتا ہے اور عرش کے نیچے پہنچ کر پہلے سجدہ کرتا ہے
۔ پھر ( دوبارہ آنے کی ) اجازت چاہتا ہے اور اسے اجازت دی جاتی ہے
اور وہ دن بھی قریب ہے ، جب یہ سجدہ کرے گا
تو اس کا سجدہ قبول نہ ہو گا اور اجازت چاہے گا
لیکن اجازت نہ ملے گی
۔ بلکہ اس سے کہا جائے گا کہ جہاں سے آیا تھا وہیں واپس چلا جا
۔ چنانچہ اس دن وہ مغرب ہی سے نکلے گا ۔ اللہ تعالیٰ کے فرمان (سورۃ یٰسٓ آیت 38 ) میں اسی طرف اشارہ ہے ۔
صحیح بخاری حدیث نمبر 3199
Kindly look into Dr Weinstein opinion on string theory and portals for space travel
He mathematician from hardward and there is no one in Pakistan even discussing his take on subject issue
mutazali series completed???
No. More coming.
Has philosophy become irrelevant?sir we have not witnessed dominant philosophers as such ,since Bertrand Russell..is it due to the advancement in empirical sciences?
Thinking about quantum physics we are still thinking about physical. Matter and energy are both physical world things. So Quantum physics is not META PHYSICS.
Do you agree with me?
So whatever we will discover in future, it will be physical world.
What is meta physical world and who will ever explain this?
This question is still unanswerable?
❤
If the cat is alive or dead?
Easy-peasy 🎉
👍👍👍
یہ کائنات ابھی ناتمام ہے شاید
کہ آ رہی ہے دمادم صدائے کن فیکوں
اور وہ جو ایک نظریہ تھا
کہ دنیا میں چار عناصر ہیں
پانی مٹی أگ اور ہوا
اس نظریہ کے بارے میں مکمل تفصیل بتائیں
It was the dominant thought from the Greek era till the discovery of the periodic tables.
Sir youv have in the above vlog that smallest partical of mass was called atom in greek for more than 2000 yeas ago....
یہ چار عناصر ایٹموں پر مشتمل تھے، اس میں کنفیوژن کیا ہے۔
3:05 am 28/apr/2024
Quantum physics and philosophy are two side of same coin. If some one is obsessed with one , he is bound to be obsessed with other as well
یہ بالکل اسی طرح ہے جیسے پرانے ماڈل کے ٹیلیوژن پر جب سگنل نہ آرہے ہوں تو جو اس وقت اسکرین پر آرہا ہوتا ہے جسے ٹی وی اسٹیٹک نوئیس بھی کہا جاتا ہے۔۔۔
جب اینٹینے کا دور تھا
ہم اس وقت کہتے تھے کہ ٹی وی پر مکھیاں آرہی ہیں۔۔۔۔۔
مخصوص سگنل کے زریعے ٹی وی پر تصویر لانا یا بھیجنا ایک کنٹرولڈ یا پریڈکٹ کام ہے ۔۔۔۔ لیکن وہ تصویر یا کسی چینل کا چلنا۔۔۔ یا نمودار ہونا ۔۔۔
اس اسٹیٹک نوئس والے پلیٹ فارم پر ہی وارد ہوتا ہے ۔۔۔۔۔۔
جب سگنل نہیں آرہے ہوتے تو مکھیاں یا دانے ایک غیر مخصوص یا ان پریڈکٹ طرح سے مسلسل حرکت میں رہتے ہیں ۔۔۔
گو کہ نان اسٹیٹک نوئیس کو بگ بینگ کے سگنل کہا جاتا ہے ۔۔۔۔
آپ ان دانوں کا اندازاہ نہیں لگا سکتے کے کب کوئی کہاں ابھرے گا اور کب کوئی کہاں غائب ہوگا ۔۔۔۔
اس کا اندازہ لگانے کے لیے ان مسلسل سگنل کو جاننے کی ضرورت پڑتی ہے جو سگنل مسلسل ٹی وی کا ٹرانسمیٹر وصول کر کے اسکرین پر دکھا رہا ہوتا ہے یہ ایک مستقل قدرتی سگنل ہے اور جو بہت وسیع ہے ۔۔۔
لیکن اسی سگنل میں سے جب ہم براڈکاسٹر کے زریعے ایک مخصوص سگنل نشر کرتے ہیں تو اسی پلیٹ فارم پر اس مخصوص سگنل کے تحت اس مستقل سگنل پر تصویر نمودار ہوتی ہے ۔۔۔۔۔یا وہ مستقل سگنل ایک مخصوص سگنل کو نمودار کرتا ہے۔۔۔۔
جیسے ایٹم ایک مخصوص تصویر ہے ۔۔۔
ایک مستقل انپریڈکٹ پلیٹ فارم پر ۔۔۔
جیسے ٹی وی کی مثال دی۔۔۔
عدم سے وجود کے مراحل میں جسے سائنس انپریڈکٹبل کہ رہی ہے ۔۔۔۔
اس پلیٹ فارم کو سمجھنے کے لیے اس سے ایک قدم اور آگے جانا پڑے گا ۔۔۔
۔۔
اسی طرح جس طرح ٹی وی میں جسے ہم نو سگنل کہتے ہیں بنیادی طور پر وہ ایک مستقل سگنل ہے جو کائنات میں ہر جگہ ہے۔۔۔۔
ڈیٹا جیسے جیسے ملتا جاے گا یہ چیزیں بھی
وہ سگنل کہاں سے آتا اسی کی تو کھوج نہیں لگ رہی۔
@@saimch.9388 میرے علم کے مطابق کھوج اس چیز کی نہیں کہ سگنل کہاں سے آرہا ہے۔۔۔۔۔
بالکہ اس چیز کی ہے۔۔۔کہ اس سگنل یا پلیٹ فارم کے کام کرنے کے طریقہ کو سمجھ کر یا ڈی کوڈ کر کے ۔۔۔۔اپنی کوڈنگ کے مطابق کیسے اسے استعمال میں لایا جاے۔۔۔۔۔۔
اس پلیٹ فارم کو جو کہ ابھی تک پریڈکٹ نہیں ہو پارہا ۔۔۔اسے پریڈکٹ کر کے اپنے استعمال میں لایا جاے
نئی تخلیق کی جاے۔۔۔۔
مثال کے طور پر جب ایٹم کو پھاڑتے ہیں تو وہ روشنی اور حرارت میں یا انرجی میں تبدیل ہوگیا ۔۔۔۔
ایٹم اور اس کے پھٹنے تک ہر چیز پریڈکٹ ہے یا ہر اگلے مرحلے کا اندازہ لگایا جاسکتا ہے۔۔۔۔۔۔
سوال یہ ہے کہ انرجی سے ہم ایٹم کیسے بنائیں۔۔۔۔یا ایٹم کیسے بنا ۔۔۔۔۔؟
بنیادی طور پر انرجی اور ان نینو پارٹیکل جن سے مل کر ایٹم بنتا ہے
یا وہ پارٹیکل انرجی سے کیسے ظہور میں آتے ہیں اور انکے درمیان باونڈنگ کس ربط یا ضابطے کے تحت ہے
۔دونوں کے درمیان تعلق سمجھنے کے لیے انرجی کا رویّہ یا بہیویر ۔۔۔ابھی تک اس کو پری ڈکٹ نہیں کیا جا پا رہا۔۔۔۔۔
انرجی کا رویہ کس ضابط سے کام کرتا ہے کوانٹم فزکس میں۔۔۔۔۔
وہ ضابطہ یا قانون ابھی تک سمجھ نہیں آرہا
وقت کے ساتھ انسان سمجھ لے گا کہ کس وقت انرجی کا یہ رویہ کن وجوہات کی بنا پر ایسا ہے
اور کن وجوہات سے یہ تبدیل ہوتا ہے۔۔۔۔
انرجی کے رویّہ یا ریسپانسب کا ربط اور وجوحات اس کے لیے صورتحال عمل اور اس کے ریسپانس کا وسیع ڈیٹا درکار ہو گا جس شاید شاید ہم اس ربط کا آوٹ کم پریڈکٹ کر سکیں
میرے علم کے مطابق کھوج اس چیز کی نہیں کہ سگنل کہاں سے آرہا ہے۔۔۔۔۔
بالکہ اس چیز کی ہے۔۔۔کہ اس سگنل یا پلیٹ فارم کے کام کرنے کے طریقہ کو سمجھ کر یا ڈی کوڈ کر کے ۔۔۔۔اپنی کوڈنگ کے مطابق کیسے اسے استعمال میں لایا جاے۔۔۔۔۔۔
اس پلیٹ فارم کو جو کہ ابھی تک پریڈکٹ نہیں ہو پارہا ۔۔۔اسے پریڈکٹ کر کے اپنے استعمال میں لایا جاے
نئی تخلیق کی جاے۔۔۔۔
مثال کے طور پر جب ایٹم کو پھاڑتے ہیں تو وہ روشنی اور حرارت میں یا انرجی میں تبدیل ہوگیا ۔۔۔۔
ایٹم اور اس کے پھٹنے تک ہر چیز پریڈکٹ ہے یا ہر اگلے مرحلے کا اندازہ لگایا جاسکتا ہے۔۔۔۔۔۔
سوال یہ ہے کہ انرجی سے ہم ایٹم کیسے بنائیں۔۔۔۔یا ایٹم کیسے بنا ۔۔۔۔۔؟
بنیادی طور پر انرجی اور ان نینو پارٹیکل جن سے مل کر ایٹم بنتا ہے
یا وہ پارٹیکل انرجی سے کیسے ظہور میں آتے ہیں اور انکے درمیان باونڈنگ کس ربط یا ضابطے کے تحت ہے
۔دونوں کے درمیان تعلق سمجھنے کے لیے انرجی کا رویّہ یا بہیویر ۔۔۔ابھی تک اس کو پری ڈکٹ نہیں کیا جا پا رہا۔۔۔۔۔
انرجی کا رویہ کس ضابط سے کام کرتا ہے کوانٹم فزکس میں۔۔۔۔۔
وہ ضابطہ یا قانون ابھی تک سمجھ نہیں آرہا
وقت کے ساتھ انسان سمجھ لے گا کہ کس وقت انرجی کا یہ رویہ کن وجوہات کی بنا پر ایسا ہے
اور کن وجوہات سے یہ تبدیل ہوتا ہے۔۔۔۔
انرجی کے رویّہ یا ریسپانسب کا ربط اور وجوحات اس کے لیے صورتحال عمل اور اس کے ریسپانس کا وسیع ڈیٹا درکار ہو گا جس شاید شاید ہم اس ربط کا آوٹ کم پریڈکٹ کر سکیں
Unfortunately ,we can't understand this universe