@@nuntana2 GoT doesn't stack up to Lost even without it's abysmal final season. Lost is much more relatable and natural, and it's also not based on a book like GoT so it's more original. I'd say GoT has a better and more complicated story but Lost is a better experience.
It's kinda funny but when I saw the very first scene of the others for the first time in season 3 my first thoughts were "hey man, they're looking kinda friendly". Almost Ethan seemed to be a good man then
Great protection Claire has - took 55 seconds for 4 of the 5 gunmen to get to Ethan even though they were looking right at him the whole time. And then after watching Jack fight him by himself for a full minute, all he gets from the others is John Locke: "He's over here! Jack's got him" LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
I assume they didn't want to get too close as they didn't want him to run away clearly shown by the fact that Ethan didn't know they had guns meaning he could have been forced to run and then they would have to shoot him anyways.
@@_wanted_outlaw3007 Exactly! Also, he seemed to have a degree of super strength considering he was able to hang Charlie from a tree as well as lift him with one hand without effort, was skilled enough to beat the shit out of Jack, smart enough to fool them all into thinking he was one of them, and stealthy enough to kill one of them even when they were prepared and had traps set. The guy was clearly dangerous. Not to mention he also had the advantage of them being on his home turf. For all they knew, Ethan could've brought more of his friends with him, hence why it took all of them to capture him.
@@ghostfacekiller4371 yes dude was absolutely built but he's not going to want to go up against five gunmen. If he saw them or had even an Inkling there was something more going on he would have skedaddled. It doesn't matter how strong he was as his chest could not stop bullets. clearly he was not an idiot but he wasn't smart enough to have avoided the trap.
Sublime scene; Jack kicking ROM's ass that is. No let up, just keeps thumping away - he had to have it. And don't agree with those down on Jack, he is one of the coolest characters to feature in any TV show. Brilliant!
Ethan should have beaten jack with ease here, than ran off into the jungle. Locke should have than found him and gotten into an epic battle with Ethan. Obviously Locke would end up making Ethan his bitch because Locke is an alpha mother ####er. That would have been way more epic
@@kbanghart if Ethan and Keamy fused together and became one person with both of their strength, speed, and fighting skills combined they would be tpugh enough to survive one full second in a fight against Locke
Honestly Charlie probably saved them from a lot of trouble by just killing Ethan. They would’ve sent more people to rescue him and fuck with the survivors had he been kept alive
People always are angry that Charlie killed Ethan because he could have given answers, but consider these things. First, as Charlie says, "do you really think he was gonna tell us anything?". People try to say Sayid could have tortured the information out of him, but I don't think so. Sayid didn't want to torture anybody and even if he would I doubt Ethan gives it up right away. This brings me to my next point-the Others would have inevitably came to either rescue or kill Ethan before he would talk. No way the Others were just gonna let someone stay captured. Especially when that person is their best doctor. They likely have to kill a few castaways before they could get to wherever Ethan was going to be detained. Ultimately, it was probally for the best Charlie killed Ethan.
This is a silly take, even if Ethan didn't break under torture - which we don't really have any reason to believe - he was still valuable collateral to trade with the others. The others were sending people there irrespective of whether they had Ethan or not, at least this way they had leverage and a good idea of what they'd look for. And even if for some reason Ethan was immune to torture tactics, there was absolutely no reason not to try it first and kill him afterwards. Charlie quite clearly acted out of selfish and impulsive reasons and then tried to give weak rationalisations afterwards.
@@Hankblue @Guillaume "which we don't really have any reason to believe" considering the lengths we see see the others go to later on to not talk as well as knowing how loyal Ethan was to them, it gives pretty good reasons to believe he wouldn't talk. What leverage would they have keeping Ethan if the others were willing to let him die or more likely kill him to prevent information leaking out? Oh I agree Charlie did it purely out of emotion. Logically it would have made sense to try and torture him for a day and then kill him. However, this wasn't gonna happen. Sayid didn't want to torture anyone at this time and even if he did and failed I doubt Jack lets him die. Look at what happened with Ben in season 2. I imagine something similar taking place if Ethan was captured. Ultimately, it's pretty clear the risks of Ethan being alive outweighed the benefits of him possibly giving information. Best case scenario the others manage to negotiate a peaceful trade for Ethan and the losties get some information. Worst case multiple of them die
@@ajl9772 I mean this is season one, neither the characters nor the viewers have any reason to believe he wouldn't talk. Sure if you want to talk about an omniscient viewer they could make that assumption, but an omniscient viewer would also still has every right to be angry at Charlie for being stupid and impulsive. Also, how are you simultaneously asserting that he wouldn't talk, but then also saying "the others would come and kill/rescue him to make sure he doesn't talk"? These two stipulations are inconsistent with one another. There are any number of ways they could leverage Ethan. a) He was valuable to the others outright as a surgeon. b) They could have had him think he'd escaped and then followed him to the others to gain information about them. c) They could have used him as bait to capture more others trying to kill/rescue him. There were dozens of ways they could have used him to their advantage. I don't think the risks of him being alive outweighed the benefits at all. If you want to talk hyptheticals I can just as easily stipulate a scenario where keeping Ethan alive and using him as leverage was the difference between people living and dying.
@@Hankblue My point was that everything worked out for the best based on what we later learn so the whole omniscient viewer thing is irrelevant to this conversation. Im saying Ethan wouldn't talk, but that doesn't mean the others would trust this to be the case. Why would the take the slightest chance he may talk when they can make it absolutely zero? Nice try, but the 2 do not contradict each other. Option A assumes Ethan talks and tells him their value, which again how much did they truly value him. They sent their valuable surgeon in alone to clean up his mess. They tried to follow Ethan before and failed miserably. Yes they could have tried to use him as bait. How you think that plays out? The others had an actual army lol. Yes there are several ways the could have used him for their advantage and they all likely end in failure. Im sure you could write a good fan fiction. However, it's a fact the others hilariously outmatched the survivors in both numbers and resources. The survivors got a 2nd opportunity later where they had a hostage and how did that play out again? Odds are overwhelmingly in the others favor. Risk easily outweighs the rewards of keeping him alive.
@@ajl9772 What do you mean "everything worked out for the best"? There are plenty of things that could have worked out better, and leveraging Ethan could easily have been an integral part of that. I like how you're super selective about your counter factuals picking out only hypotheticals where stuff could have gone wrong, and disregarding all counter-factuals that involve stuff working out better. Oh so for you, who watched all of like 15 minutes of screen time involving Ethan, there's no chance he would talk. But for the others who knew him for decades there's a chance he talks. I'll probably go with the judgement of the people that have known him orders of magnitude longer then 🤔
The thing is though, they wanted answers from Ethan that they were never gonna get anyways. Ethan would have escaped, and took Claire with him. My thought on this is that Charlie knew that that’s how things would go down, he knew that as long as Ethan was alive, Claire wouldn’t be safe.
Ethan Rom was the antagonist in season 1 of this show Lost. He kidnapped Claire, killed Scott and terrorized the camp. He was an Other, not a survivor of Oceanic Flight 815. He wasn't on the plane. Charlie got revenge on him by using Jack's gun to shoot him 6 times, killing him. He got what he deserved.
Probably one of the best death scenes, that is of a villain. The motivations of the Others aside, Ethan deserved every moment of that ass beating and those 6 shots. Dude was a coward, doctor or not.
Ethan had more combat experience and probably more fighting experience. But that didnt matter that was a fight jack was going to win he was put for blood
Team Charlie on this one. Ethan nearly killed Charlie by hanging him. That man was capable of anything and would have killed more people if they let him live. The Others would have found a way to release Ethan. The real question is why wouldn’t Charlie kill him? You guys are correct he acted out of revenge. At the same time he did everyone a favor by killing him.
PS,I am a Lost fanatic,have watched all seasons on DVD with commentry,and deleted scenes.I Have at least another 108 scenes,yes,I did that,with editing and timeline problems that prove my point,from season 1,They we're all living separate lives,timelines,Death, Purgatory,Afterlife etc
How hurley later describes this really annoys me. Charlie got "upset". Upset my ass... Hurley has no idea on what charley felt as he usually is with his pacifism. I would have done the same thing.
Ye, because just as Charlie, you are a moron. Charlie was the most useless person and killed the only person, who could've given valuable information about this place. You would have done the same thing, sure dawg ;)
Love the show,but here is were you get the timelines.Jack different tattoos on arms,switched,left to right.As you watch the show from season 1,Continuity breaks continues,to show a different timeline.Locke throwing knives,they change,Kate,her rubber bracelet,left arm,right arm,drive with the farmer telephone poles,switched left to right,Said killing the golpher body moved,Locke getting money from his dad,cash is moved,etc
Is it just that Felt sad for his death after knowing his story in the further seasons? He wasn't a Physcho, Ben Linus turned a Good Doctor into a Kidnapper
Charlie was mad he got his ass kick. He actually didn't need to kill him. I'm sure the Arab guy could have gotten answers from Ethan with his torture methods.
When Claire was first kidnapped I thought FOR SURE she was gonna show up again but missing the baby, that would've been wild. Instead they went the typical amnesia route, which was kinda disappointing.
Answer me this… How is it that Ethan didn’t recognized Locke after Oceanic 815 crashed? Locke teleported back to the Nigerian plane crash and tried to reason with Ethan (who shot him) about being their leader. Locke disappears with the flashes and Ethan is somehow cool with the idea that the passenger from Oceanic 815 looks exactly like the teleporting guy. That scene was unnecessary because Ethan never developed any interest towards Locke. It would have been a cool way to pay off his curiosity towards Locke if in season 1 Ethan asked suspicious questions. Such as: “Hey… are you sure we never met before?” , “Have you ever been shot?”, “Does the name ‘Richard’ means something to you?”
I'm watching Lost for the first time... Sawyer is growing on me which is shocking to me. He's such a badass he just needs to direct that to actually helping the group. the "uh uh uh jungle boy, not even for one second" line is great -- I'm hoping that if theres more people on the island that are bad, Sawyer can unleash the beast on em. Jack winning this fight is great though after getting obliterated by Ethan a couple episodes again.
At some stage the writers were going to have Locke fight Ethan before Jack did, apparently Locke would manage to stab or injure Ethan in the ensuing melee, but would ultimately lose and get knocked out by Ethan, at which point Jack would come along and this fight would happen. But they excluded it for whatever reason, my guess is if Ethan was injured it'd devalue Jack winning in the rematch. Plus another problem is Locke is pretty old, like he's still a badass, but honestly I don't think he'd beat Ethan, a younger Locke might have, though.
@@dreadrath Old comment I know but I just wanted to pitch in. I envision Locke dispatching Ethan easily. With all that training he did in the show, zipping a blade into a man's chest from a distance wouldn't be unimaginable. Hell even a skull. Say the gap was closed, Locke would garrote the neck, spinal, or other vital areas. Not impossible, especially with the length of blade he uses. Far less likely for anyone to be able to defend a blade with their bare hands without serious or fatal injury, although I will add it is more than possible for Ethan to take out Locke permanently. A tackle and ripping the knife from his grip, using it against him. Risky but it could work. Locke 8/10 encountera wins imo.
@@TheJackHamlet I guess it comes down to circumstance, like who has the drop on who. Yeah in close quarters I'd give it to Ethan, Locke is a bit too old for that kind of combat (Maybe a younger Locke with old Locke's skills would have a chance) I mean Locke throws a good punch but Ethan is a beast in hand to hand (Kind of funny that they both beat the crap out of poor Charlie) Locke could hold out for a little while I suppose, but Its possible Ethan might have a blade of his own, though from what we saw, he never really used one, so its hard to say. I'm inclined to agree with you on a fight over a distance since Locke usually has a gun and knives, but ethan have his gun at the ready too. If Loicke reacts first they could end up getting wounding or killing, a knife then a bullet. But if Ethan reacts first, Locke ain't faster than a bullet. There's also the hunter/stalker skills of both men, Locke admitted Ethan may have known more about tracking, but that might also be because Ethan had superior knowledge of the island. Either way, if they're both after eachother, it might come down to who is the stealthiest and most cunning and is able to ambush the other first, and quickly enough that the other can't react in time.
I watched this because in episode 16 Hurley said Charlie shot him in the chest 4 times. But I thought I remembered it was 6 times, and I was right. Did anyone else notice that?
Honestly, it’s better that Charlie killed him there. Ethan seems like a really tough guy, he probably wouldn’t have given anything up while being tortured, and he’s also a pretty strong guy, he most likely would have escaped eventually anyway.
Charlie died Season 3 episode 22 through the looking glass. Makhalil exploded making Charlie drown while Desmond tried to hurry to save Charlie, it almost worked. Charlie is later seen in flash sideways.
Sorry but I always thought this was the stupidest move of all time. Charlie is a total waste of space. By killing Ethan he placed Claire and everyone else in greater danger. Sayid could have gotten the information out of him. And this is the guy who later abducts Sun just so he can humiliate Locke?
![Lost - Jack and Locke argue who should push the button [2x03 - Orientation]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/T0YYU_WWOOc/mqdefault.jpg)
"uh uh uh jungle boy, not even for one second" best line ever.
Qzar 😂😂😂😂
Love it.
Sawyer had the one liners for days
Sawyer had the best dialogues
I love Sawyers one liners 😂
I wish I could experience LOST for the first time again.... this is one of the more memorable scenes.
craftalaser yea
I'm experiencing lost for the 6th time. It's just as good as my first time
It was brilliant... real wonder in the early series’... second only to Game of Thrones
@@nuntana2 GoT doesn't stack up to Lost even without it's abysmal final season. Lost is much more relatable and natural, and it's also not based on a book like GoT so it's more original. I'd say GoT has a better and more complicated story but Lost is a better experience.
Thx disney+
I know they needed him alive but damn that psycho deserved it.
Like Epstein
@Holden Mcgroine torture
It's kinda funny but when I saw the very first scene of the others for the first time in season 3 my first thoughts were "hey man, they're looking kinda friendly". Almost Ethan seemed to be a good man then
@@frite6090 exactly, just a guy fixing a sink lol
Great protection Claire has - took 55 seconds for 4 of the 5 gunmen to get to Ethan even though they were looking right at him the whole time. And then after watching Jack fight him by himself for a full minute, all he gets from the others is
John Locke: "He's over here! Jack's got him" LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
@Romanogers4ever Sayid would of took Ethan apart too!
I assume they didn't want to get too close as they didn't want him to run away clearly shown by the fact that Ethan didn't know they had guns meaning he could have been forced to run and then they would have to shoot him anyways.
@@_wanted_outlaw3007 Exactly! Also, he seemed to have a degree of super strength considering he was able to hang Charlie from a tree as well as lift him with one hand without effort, was skilled enough to beat the shit out of Jack, smart enough to fool them all into thinking he was one of them, and stealthy enough to kill one of them even when they were prepared and had traps set. The guy was clearly dangerous. Not to mention he also had the advantage of them being on his home turf.
For all they knew, Ethan could've brought more of his friends with him, hence why it took all of them to capture him.
@@ghostfacekiller4371 yes dude was absolutely built but he's not going to want to go up against five gunmen. If he saw them or had even an Inkling there was something more going on he would have skedaddled. It doesn't matter how strong he was as his chest could not stop bullets. clearly he was not an idiot but he wasn't smart enough to have avoided the trap.
I'm glad they had 5 people there for backup when no one did anything
For real tho. Only Jack did something
wow. This comment is 10 years old and i just came here to say that they wanted jack to get his payback.
i know but still i’m happy jack got to get his revenge 😂
Jack didn't even care about Claire lol he just wanted to get payback for his first ass-kicking
Jason well he got his payback
Yeah, an awesome beat down
Alot of people forget he killed Scott one of the random so it was extra personal for Jack he cared for everyone
No he wanted payback for Claire after all thats jack’s sister . Spoiler its true
@@seanwelsh3245No that wasn’t Ethan who killed Scott . The guy who did came from the water . Ethan was already on the island
My parents used to watch this show when I was little, and for some reason this scene always stuck with me...
Sublime scene; Jack kicking ROM's ass that is. No let up, just keeps thumping away - he had to have it. And don't agree with those down on Jack, he is one of the coolest characters to feature in any TV show. Brilliant!
agreed. In the last episode, he's better than most action heroes in blockbuster movies
Ethan should have beaten jack with ease here, than ran off into the jungle. Locke should have than found him and gotten into an epic battle with Ethan. Obviously Locke would end up making Ethan his bitch because Locke is an alpha mother ####er. That would have been way more epic
@@thelavinator6343 meh. Locke never came across as that badass
@@kbanghart if Ethan and Keamy fused together and became one person with both of their strength, speed, and fighting skills combined they would be tpugh enough to survive one full second in a fight against Locke
@@thelavinator6343 LMAO Wait, you're talking about the new combined Locke / smoke monster right? Not the normal human Locke lol
Honestly Charlie probably saved them from a lot of trouble by just killing Ethan. They would’ve sent more people to rescue him and fuck with the survivors had he been kept alive
"HD"
Oh the irony. Dont get so triggered and calm down.
enjoy 240p
240p. Lol
"I wasn't going to let that animal near her ever again."
Sawyer: uhuhuh jungleboy, not even for one sec :D
my favourite line
People always are angry that Charlie killed Ethan because he could have given answers, but consider these things. First, as Charlie says, "do you really think he was gonna tell us anything?". People try to say Sayid could have tortured the information out of him, but I don't think so. Sayid didn't want to torture anybody and even if he would I doubt Ethan gives it up right away. This brings me to my next point-the Others would have inevitably came to either rescue or kill Ethan before he would talk. No way the Others were just gonna let someone stay captured. Especially when that person is their best doctor. They likely have to kill a few castaways before they could get to wherever Ethan was going to be detained. Ultimately, it was probally for the best Charlie killed Ethan.
This is a silly take, even if Ethan didn't break under torture - which we don't really have any reason to believe - he was still valuable collateral to trade with the others. The others were sending people there irrespective of whether they had Ethan or not, at least this way they had leverage and a good idea of what they'd look for.
And even if for some reason Ethan was immune to torture tactics, there was absolutely no reason not to try it first and kill him afterwards. Charlie quite clearly acted out of selfish and impulsive reasons and then tried to give weak rationalisations afterwards.
@@Hankblue @Guillaume "which we don't really have any reason to believe" considering the lengths we see see the others go to later on to not talk as well as knowing how loyal Ethan was to them, it gives pretty good reasons to believe he wouldn't talk. What leverage would they have keeping Ethan if the others were willing to let him die or more likely kill him to prevent information leaking out? Oh I agree Charlie did it purely out of emotion. Logically it would have made sense to try and torture him for a day and then kill him. However, this wasn't gonna happen. Sayid didn't want to torture anyone at this time and even if he did and failed I doubt Jack lets him die. Look at what happened with Ben in season 2. I imagine something similar taking place if Ethan was captured. Ultimately, it's pretty clear the risks of Ethan being alive outweighed the benefits of him possibly giving information. Best case scenario the others manage to negotiate a peaceful trade for Ethan and the losties get some information. Worst case multiple of them die
@@ajl9772 I mean this is season one, neither the characters nor the viewers have any reason to believe he wouldn't talk. Sure if you want to talk about an omniscient viewer they could make that assumption, but an omniscient viewer would also still has every right to be angry at Charlie for being stupid and impulsive. Also, how are you simultaneously asserting that he wouldn't talk, but then also saying "the others would come and kill/rescue him to make sure he doesn't talk"? These two stipulations are inconsistent with one another.
There are any number of ways they could leverage Ethan. a) He was valuable to the others outright as a surgeon. b) They could have had him think he'd escaped and then followed him to the others to gain information about them. c) They could have used him as bait to capture more others trying to kill/rescue him. There were dozens of ways they could have used him to their advantage.
I don't think the risks of him being alive outweighed the benefits at all. If you want to talk hyptheticals I can just as easily stipulate a scenario where keeping Ethan alive and using him as leverage was the difference between people living and dying.
@@Hankblue My point was that everything worked out for the best based on what we later learn so the whole omniscient viewer thing is irrelevant to this conversation. Im saying Ethan wouldn't talk, but that doesn't mean the others would trust this to be the case. Why would the take the slightest chance he may talk when they can make it absolutely zero? Nice try, but the 2 do not contradict each other.
Option A assumes Ethan talks and tells him their value, which again how much did they truly value him. They sent their valuable surgeon in alone to clean up his mess. They tried to follow Ethan before and failed miserably. Yes they could have tried to use him as bait. How you think that plays out? The others had an actual army lol. Yes there are several ways the could have used him for their advantage and they all likely end in failure. Im sure you could write a good fan fiction. However, it's a fact the others hilariously outmatched the survivors in both numbers and resources. The survivors got a 2nd opportunity later where they had a hostage and how did that play out again? Odds are overwhelmingly in the others favor. Risk easily outweighs the rewards of keeping him alive.
@@ajl9772 What do you mean "everything worked out for the best"? There are plenty of things that could have worked out better, and leveraging Ethan could easily have been an integral part of that. I like how you're super selective about your counter factuals picking out only hypotheticals where stuff could have gone wrong, and disregarding all counter-factuals that involve stuff working out better.
Oh so for you, who watched all of like 15 minutes of screen time involving Ethan, there's no chance he would talk. But for the others who knew him for decades there's a chance he talks. I'll probably go with the judgement of the people that have known him orders of magnitude longer then 🤔
They foreshadowed this moment the whole episode. I wasn't shocked at all when it happened, in fact, I was waiting for it
The thing is though, they wanted answers from Ethan that they were never gonna get anyways. Ethan would have escaped, and took Claire with him. My thought on this is that Charlie knew that that’s how things would go down, he knew that as long as Ethan was alive, Claire wouldn’t be safe.
“Nice one doc” best line from the best season
Ethan Rom was the antagonist in season 1 of this show Lost. He kidnapped Claire, killed Scott and terrorized the camp. He was an Other, not a survivor of Oceanic Flight 815. He wasn't on the plane. Charlie got revenge on him by using Jack's gun to shoot him 6 times, killing him. He got what he deserved.
“Previously on ‘Lost’”...
@@ATMyles😂😂😂
Jack and Charlie fucked him UP. Probably one of the best scenes from the first season.
Crazy that this is 20 years old. Feels like we've been in more or less the same cycle of pop culture for decades.
Jack wanted this so bad 😂
And Sawyer's uh uh uh jungle boy !!
“uh uh jungle boy, not even for a second” i laughed so hard when I watched it for the first time
Yup me too and I still do! Sawyer's nicknames were always better than spot-on.
Probably one of the best death scenes, that is of a villain. The motivations of the Others aside, Ethan deserved every moment of that ass beating and those 6 shots. Dude was a coward, doctor or not.
Ethan had more combat experience and probably more fighting experience. But that didnt matter that was a fight jack was going to win he was put for blood
One of my favorite episodes from Season 1. Jack owed Ethan that ass whooping.
Team Charlie on this one. Ethan nearly killed Charlie by hanging him. That man was capable of anything and would have killed more people if they let him live. The Others would have found a way to release Ethan. The real question is why wouldn’t Charlie kill him? You guys are correct he acted out of revenge. At the same time he did everyone a favor by killing him.
PS,I am a Lost fanatic,have watched all seasons on DVD with commentry,and deleted scenes.I Have at least another 108 scenes,yes,I did that,with editing and timeline problems that prove my point,from season 1,They we're all living separate lives,timelines,Death, Purgatory,Afterlife etc
Lol I’m a year late but Im intrigued. Can you list a few?
How hurley later describes this really annoys me. Charlie got "upset". Upset my ass... Hurley has no idea on what charley felt as he usually is with his pacifism. I would have done the same thing.
Ye, because just as Charlie, you are a moron. Charlie was the most useless person and killed the only person, who could've given valuable information about this place. You would have done the same thing, sure dawg ;)
Love the show,but here is were you get the timelines.Jack different tattoos on arms,switched,left to right.As you watch the show from season 1,Continuity breaks continues,to show a different timeline.Locke throwing knives,they change,Kate,her rubber bracelet,left arm,right arm,drive with the farmer telephone poles,switched left to right,Said killing the golpher body moved,Locke getting money from his dad,cash is moved,etc
Is it just that Felt sad for his death after knowing his story in the further seasons?
He wasn't a Physcho, Ben Linus turned a Good Doctor into a Kidnapper
I remember vividly how me and my friends gasped/cheered the second Jack did that awesome tackle on Ethan.
at first i was glad Ethan was killed,but when i watched third season,i realized, that Ethan wasn't bad guy at all and he could be as useful as Jack...
Nikita Stepanenko nope. He tried to kill Charlie. He deserved to die.
Charlie was mad he got his ass kick. He actually didn't need to kill him. I'm sure the Arab guy could have gotten answers from Ethan with his torture methods.
Stone Cold Steve Autism Charlie was supposed to die anyways hell we knew that only when Desmond saw it coming
I know Charlie was meant to die, but for what Ethan did to him, Ethan deserved it.
@@KentPetersonmoney but who knows if Ethan would have been telling the truth anyway.
I love this. Charlie is fantastic. ♥
When Claire was first kidnapped I thought FOR SURE she was gonna show up again but missing the baby, that would've been wild. Instead they went the typical amnesia route, which was kinda disappointing.
Also, gotta love Sawyer's lines.
Glad I'm not the only one. They're delivered with such intensity.
2:48 THAT'S FOR KLLING SCOTT!!!!!!
Answer me this…
How is it that Ethan didn’t recognized Locke after Oceanic 815 crashed?
Locke teleported back to the Nigerian plane crash and tried to reason with Ethan (who shot him) about being their leader. Locke disappears with the flashes and Ethan is somehow cool with the idea that the passenger from Oceanic 815 looks exactly like the teleporting guy.
That scene was unnecessary because Ethan never developed any interest towards Locke. It would have been a cool way to pay off his curiosity towards Locke if in season 1 Ethan asked suspicious questions.
Such as: “Hey… are you sure we never met before?” , “Have you ever been shot?”, “Does the name ‘Richard’ means something to you?”
Because that time-line was it's on separate thing they kind of explained it in a episode in s5
@@seanwelsh3245wdym separate. The time travel always happened in universe.
Currently rewatching LOST all over again and I’m on this episode. Found out that it’s being streamed for free via the IMDB app.
Same here, I'm watching the series for the 6th time. I usually watch every 2 and a half years. It still is great
I would’ve done the same fucking thing, he literally hung Charlie
Strange how violent the show was when you get back and watch it a second time. Especially towards the last few seasons.
One of my favourite scenes, and a good episode. But for some reason damon lindelof described it as "everything a lost episode should not be".
It's crazy seeing Jack's fights later in the series, against sawyer and the MIB. Much better actor later on
Much better fighting doesn't equate to better "acting". I get what you're saying though
One of my favorite scenes!
Great fight scene. Sawyer has perfect delivery too!
What a scene with the perfect music
Jack off screen after this happend: that’s 6% of are ammo nigga WHAT THE FUCK.
It's funny/interesting how easily the viewer becomes the psychopath as well, wanting Ethan the character to die.
Alex Clarke Thats not really psychopatic. Ethan is a murderer and a pregnant woman kidnapper, seriously, he's fucked up.
“charlieeeee”
Jungle boy 🤣😂😅
Sawyer vs Ethan, that would be a fast fight
I'm watching Lost for the first time... Sawyer is growing on me which is shocking to me. He's such a badass he just needs to direct that to actually helping the group.
the "uh uh uh jungle boy, not even for one second" line is great -- I'm hoping that if theres more people on the island that are bad, Sawyer can unleash the beast on em.
Jack winning this fight is great though after getting obliterated by Ethan a couple episodes again.
Apparently Charlie does know how to shoot
Hes untrained doesnt mean he cant pull a trigger.
Jaeden Baker still bull crap pistols are notoriously hard to use even for shooters skilled with long guns.
And that is why u shouldn’t give anyone a gun
everything changes when everybody has a gun- lemme guess - and it all did, rite?
Yes the show went from Lost and turned into death wish LOL
Screw Jack. This should've been Lockes battle. Than again, Locke would have made Ethan look weak and pathetic.
You do realize Jack would beat the shit out of Locke right ?
At some stage the writers were going to have Locke fight Ethan before Jack did, apparently Locke would manage to stab or injure Ethan in the ensuing melee, but would ultimately lose and get knocked out by Ethan, at which point Jack would come along and this fight would happen. But they excluded it for whatever reason, my guess is if Ethan was injured it'd devalue Jack winning in the rematch. Plus another problem is Locke is pretty old, like he's still a badass, but honestly I don't think he'd beat Ethan, a younger Locke might have, though.
@@dreadrath Old comment I know but I just wanted to pitch in. I envision Locke dispatching Ethan easily. With all that training he did in the show, zipping a blade into a man's chest from a distance wouldn't be unimaginable. Hell even a skull. Say the gap was closed, Locke would garrote the neck, spinal, or other vital areas. Not impossible, especially with the length of blade he uses. Far less likely for anyone to be able to defend a blade with their bare hands without serious or fatal injury, although I will add it is more than possible for Ethan to take out Locke permanently. A tackle and ripping the knife from his grip, using it against him. Risky but it could work. Locke 8/10 encountera wins imo.
@@TheJackHamlet I guess it comes down to circumstance, like who has the drop on who. Yeah in close quarters I'd give it to Ethan, Locke is a bit too old for that kind of combat (Maybe a younger Locke with old Locke's skills would have a chance) I mean Locke throws a good punch but Ethan is a beast in hand to hand (Kind of funny that they both beat the crap out of poor Charlie) Locke could hold out for a little while I suppose, but Its possible Ethan might have a blade of his own, though from what we saw, he never really used one, so its hard to say.
I'm inclined to agree with you on a fight over a distance since Locke usually has a gun and knives, but ethan have his gun at the ready too. If Loicke reacts first they could end up getting wounding or killing, a knife then a bullet. But if Ethan reacts first, Locke ain't faster than a bullet. There's also the hunter/stalker skills of both men, Locke admitted Ethan may have known more about tracking, but that might also be because Ethan had superior knowledge of the island.
Either way, if they're both after eachother, it might come down to who is the stealthiest and most cunning and is able to ambush the other first, and quickly enough that the other can't react in time.
i was clpaing and crying from cheer
2:49 BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG!!!!!!
Neymar mato a ozil
Lost was too crazy continue to watch
uh uh uh jungle boy not even for one sec
Winner by knockout
I watched this because in episode 16 Hurley said Charlie shot him in the chest 4 times. But I thought I remembered it was 6 times, and I was right. Did anyone else notice that?
Kanker Dildo Hurley didn't pay attention
Kanker Dildo Oooor charlie shot 6 times but only hit Ethan 4 times because he's an untrained shooter
That was flat out murder
@@KentPetersonmoney to be fair, Ethan did technically kill Charlie by hanging him, but Jack revived him. Don't forget that.
I counted 6
What episode
This was probably actually one of the most violent shows of the mid 2000s
What episode is this
Season 1 episode 13 I think.
Good for Charlie
Honestly, it’s better that Charlie killed him there. Ethan seems like a really tough guy, he probably wouldn’t have given anything up while being tortured, and he’s also a pretty strong guy, he most likely would have escaped eventually anyway.
Last comment forever..watching show now
Ethan best villain
And Charlie's fucks up once again
i would do the same tbh
1:48
Sabía pelear el doctor
Charlie died Season 3 episode 22 through the looking glass. Makhalil exploded making Charlie drown while Desmond tried to hurry to save Charlie, it almost worked. Charlie is later seen in flash sideways.
Samuel Van Handel wait, is this intending to spoil?
I just finished season 1. Thanks for information.
Lol this is literally a spoiler with no context.
Wow thank you litterly just watching it for the first time on quarantine
P
stupid unnecessary charlie
Sorry but I always thought this was the stupidest move of all time. Charlie is a total waste of space. By killing Ethan he placed Claire and everyone else in greater danger. Sayid could have gotten the information out of him.
And this is the guy who later abducts Sun just so he can humiliate Locke?