There is a shock wave in call of duty. There always has been, it's just very subtle and hard to notice. If you're playing at a high frame rate and record at a high frame rate. You can slow it down and see it yourself.
I think the reason why it was underestimated is because the producer tried to release 2042 instead of being more interested in the game. It would be great if a little more attention was paid to it, for example, Russians were added, new game modes were added, servers for 128 people were opened, innovations such as filling while aiming were added. It's my favorite game of the series and it still has a great prone mechanic that many games don't have. A game with high potential. I wish the producers could see this too.@@drinknukacola5315
True, for example if you shoot a 1845 Colt Navy, it’ll smoke more than a Glock 21, and if you shoot an GAU-8 Avenger Gatling Cannon it will smoke due to how fast the rounds are shot. EDIT: the 1845 is a black powder pistol.
BFV's sound design is where they literally peaked. I would be in a building with a teammate firing a bolt action, and the pop of his gun in the room would reverberate along the shell dropping on the wooden floor with its little bounce sounded so realistic. They manage to capture the perfect volume and effects for these to feel like you're in an indoor range without needing ear protection.
battlefield V is also just more diverse, with planes and tanks, you have to be strategic, and the game is full of little gimmicks, historical references (example: devastation is rotterdam, and the raid bomber raid that can rarely happen is based on the bombing of rotterdam, and has the cathedral in it) many of the locations are historically accurate, and the guns all look and sound good. vanguard has a few references, but not nearly as much as BFV, and is overall in between bad and mediocre.
I think it all depends on what you prefer in terms of playstyle. You are very much correct, BF V is more diverse and strategic, however, I've spent maybe 20 hours on BFV since it came out and have ground out every single gun in Vanguard to max weapon level, BF V may be more diverse but Vanguard just has more replayability to me, doesn't get boring as quickly.
Notice how the soldier looks away from his target when aiming down the sights at 3:32 also you can swim in Battlefield V and for some reason, you can swim in the previous COD game but not in Vanguard
Best explaination for ya: Back in 2013, BF4 built on BF3's swim system by including being able to shoot a pistol as well as diving. CoD capitalized on this with the release of Advanced Warfare by Sledgehammer Games in 2014, which allowed a similar system but it was more of a gimmick and the movement felt more free. In 2015, Treyarch made BO3 which boasted the advanced and crazy movement, and basically just made water a playable space. They then recycled the animations, physics, and effects across BO4(2018) and BOCW(2021). But SHG introduced direct water combat to CoD, why doesn't Vanguard have it? Well, AW was on the older CoD engine, and they have since updated to the engine that MW2019 has, which probably doesn't support water combat physics.
13:02 You CAN peek in BFV. When you aim at a ledge at a certain angle your soldier will sway his gun to the side indicating you can peek, in which you can ADS to do so. This also applies to horizontal cover blocking your view, you can also set a bind to manually lean so you don't have to position yourself to auto-lean.
Honestly, in the state BF5 is in rn, I can say that it didn't deserve all the hate it got in the past 4 years. The maps are beautiful, the guns sound amazing, sniping is so satisfying, planes feel great, tanks feel great, gunplay is smooth, plenty of guns (though not as much as battlefield 4, probably due to there not being that many ww2 suitable guns), and it's just a blast with friends. Its a great game once you get past some bugs here and there. Glad to see that it's still holding up well
@The Apple Of Judgement atleast its not some generic "hero and sacrifice always needed and works bla bla we're the hero bcs we save people and country bla bla bla" Moments its more bad than redheaded girl with robot arm bcs its always the american and its allies as heroes and axis as villains even though both of them not even a hero they're just a villain that is greedy for lands and materials, they atleast makes it more variable, more fun, its a game not a documentary or even real life, a game is where we have fun(some for exercising ur heart and tells stories of some people) not a documentaries kind.
@@norbertosodoy3771 Yes it does best MW in attention to detail, graphics, optimization, performance, animations (you can argue for reloading animations)
man it hurts my soul to see that BFV was left in a somewhat unfinished state. It has over time gotten pretty good gameplaywise and I'm shure that it is still fun to play. Unfortunately, content about eastern front and d-day are some essential things that are missing, therefore it just feels incomplete in my eyes...such a shame it did not live to the legacy of the masterpiece it could have become. Probably, the damage was already irreversable from the day it released.
@@csupidavid Vanguard was very unnecessary because we just got a ww2 game in 2017. Also, Cold War has a great campaign and, in my opinion, better zombies. As for multiplayer, both are as toxic as the other and though it is definitely not like that mw2 lobby where your mother was the main topic, both games’ multiplayer is similar.
12:47 you can actually peek, but not with the door. Just hold the gun and aim at the angle next to the door and the soldier will peek based on your mouse hover. This was even in Battlefield 1.
I think it was more of an artistic choice because Vanguard feels a lot more clean and alternate history while cod World War II acts more dirty and the war is the main subject
@@1upproductions423 Also, historical accuracy seems like an afterthought in Vanguard, or at least not a main goal. They're now adding less WW2 guns and some sequences in the campaign are plain non realistic.
@@1upproductions423some of it has to do with the WW2 engine having more impressive material systems than the Modern Warfare/Vanguard engine. It’s a shame that branch of the COD engine is being thrown away as the developers all pivot to the MWII engine since that WW2 engine broke a lot of technical ground in rendering for COD.
Battlefield 5 was very bad in terms of concept at the time of release, but it has game mechanics and really elaborated content. Battlefield 5 is being played a lot these days because the expansion packs that came later added a character to the game. But when we look at Battlefield 2042, I see that it has turned into a simplified game that lacks the little details we see in Battlefield games, both in terms of concept and game mechanics. I hope this only applies to one game.
One thing thats interesting is that you can see that a lot of the firing animations in bfv have the reciprocating charging handles/motions not timed properly with firing. Not sure if this is an artistic change thats meant to keep it looking smoother. Would also be nice to see an upclose comparison of the details/textures of the weapons between the game. An interesting aspect in regards to the audio for ejected shells is that both bfv and bf2042 (and probably older games too) simply just play a specific sound file based on where you are standing, there is no directionality at all or any other logic, it just plays a sound a set time after firing.
Something I think is overlooked is that battlefield 5 multiplayer tries to make you feel like a brand new GI however vanguard makes you takes control of a highly trained professional and that’s why bf5 is more immersive!
i also (just) noticed that in BF5 when the character replaces the mg42 barrel instead of grabbing the hot barrel with their hand (i mean why would you) they use a shell cassing
In Vanguard when grenades are being thrown, the operators would call them out. You should have an enemy player throw a grenade at you and hear their responses.
All in all bf has always been better but cod surprised me in this video I haven’t played cod since aw but I definitely didn’t expect some of the detail in vanguard
I think for the vanguard m1 garand when you fire 5 bullets, it doesn’t keep all 3 in the clip since in order to open the internal magazine it has to eject one bullet. Idk if I’m 100 percent correct but I just wanted to point out that it might not be as accurate.
Another thing is that in BF5, if there’s an explosion that really hurts but doesn’t kill you, your character will cuss or react in their language (like if you’re British and this happens I’ve heard my soldier go “shit!” quite a few times lol and I’ve heard German soldiers say the same thing in German)
Except for the fact that theres plenty of documentation, training manuals from the time period, and people replicating it today that show that garand thumb isn't a thing that happens when you load a full clip. It happens when you are messing around with the rifle without a clip in it, or if you very carefully set it up. Alongside that the garands ammo count in bfv is wrong. 8 round clip, fire 3 rounds. 4 in the clip and 1 in the chamber, when they open it and eject clip it manages to somehow put the round in the chamber back in the clip?
@@johntravoltage959 brother you can’t have 8 + 1 in the chamber with an m1 garand. Brother you might be the stupidest person I’ve seen all week. And garant thumb literally can happen, if you do it right it won’t but on a war zone, there’s a high chance of it happening.
I believe both games have great little details. though I think both franchises are in a bad spot right now, I hope as a battlefield fan both COD and BF get better again. Let’s get back into our friendly rivalry! :)
I wish we could but it's kinda hard when btf 2042 is an absolute dumpster fire and a lot of cod fanboys, unlike you, a very respectful person, they just destroy you because of 2042 :( i want to go back in time
@@sgtmonkeypirate I guess, shit to you is fun to others 🤷♂️ just give people a break and do what you like. Nobody cares at the end of the day. Some will enjoy, some will hate. Live your life and give others a damn break 😁 vanguard lobby's are full !
I’m sure most people have noticed but the quality of games has been rapidly decreasing and I think it started with COD: Cold War because that was the beginning of where people thought they could just start pumping out games and not putting proper quality and detail and making the next game worse than the last. Cold War came out in half of the time COD games normally take to create (2 years) which made it only half as good. If Treyarch took more time on their game it would have been possibly the best COD game to hit.
It was originally shg’s game. But due to mass disagreements during game development, Treyarch had to take over a game they had to redo from almost scratch
In bf5 with the lee enfold the way they hold it by the trigger is historically accurate. Idk how to describe it but they held it like that so the can reload faster in irl. ( look it up)
Well, actually with the M1-Garand, they both got it wrong. After he fires 3 rounds, there should only be 4 rounds in the clip (yes, it's actually called a clip in this instance...) since one round was in the chamber that would have ejected. But also, there's nothing really holding the rounds in the clip when it's not full so they wouldn't have stayed attached to it anyway...
Lmao nice lies brother Give me any footage of vanguard that doesn’t look like a PS3 game and looks better than this ua-cam.com/video/jbRig-bTMaU/v-deo.html
Soldiers in World War II would not have soft skin after even a few days of combat. Most soldiers in that war were incredibly young, yet in Vanguard, they all look like they’re 30 or 40
One thing to note is also during the iris comparison you can see that the soldier’s face in bfv is dirty which makes more sense while the soldier in vanguard has a clean face
The glass streaks aren't from cleaning, old school glass panes had imperfections in them, especially in areas that were more remote because they rarely had talented artisans
I play Battlefield Vietnam (yeah, I know. Dont judge) It does have its fair share of bugs, but overall it's a good game. The only problem I have is that on the AK style guns, weapons bolt and firing selector are on the left side, not the right. Coolest part is that sometimes, not often, if you shoot the M-16 enough, it will jam. Also, I have no mods. My Linux OS wont let put them on my computer.
10:50 interesting detail, it’s weird how they both got barrel smoke wrong, it’s not a puff of smoke, it’s more like a cigarette. One thin line of smoke, like csgo
Also the third person animations of the soldiers are exceptionally well done, base on position, are interactive with water and others stuff like being close to other's characters, or structures, having different grounds and else.
Vanguard character are just built different. They don't scared about explosive blowing them up. They're even can destroy doorknob by just throwing equipments.
I do believe shimmering exists in the campaign in el alamein. Could be wrong about that, but i am not surprised that vanguard has on average less attention to detail in the smaller things. But more on the bigger things. Like grenades rolling off uneven terrain or gun moving out of the way, it did have a awful development run and it was plagued with problems, so in not frankly surprised its lacking in a ton of aspects compared to a finished game.
I think many details are left overs from MW2019 because they use the same engine. MW2019 is surprisingly detailed and realistic so it's almost obvious they would use the engine again.
@@arneshpal7702 hahahaha no. There is no chaos like this in vanguard ua-cam.com/video/KFhU3ZA0zBk/v-deo.html No graphics like this ua-cam.com/video/jbRig-bTMaU/v-deo.html No team play, no graphics, no sound design, everything is shit, modern warfare is way better.
2:23 BFV does the m1 bazooka better than vanguard but the bazooka has almost no recoil at all, also you can't push the projectile all the way into the rocket. Vanguard badly over exaggerates the recoil, both games forget to pull the wire before launching.
El detállate de la M1 garand de BFV está muy muy padre, se le atora el dado al cambiar el cartucho como pasaba en la vida real, por eso mucho soldados tenían el dedo machucado al usar esa arma
I have played a ton of cod and battlefield but I just enjoy battlefield so much more with BF4 being my favorite I had so much fun and soon many memories with BF4 on the ps3
I thinl battlefield 5 is still better but when comes to the bullets and hearing them bounce off diffrent things and some of the very minor details we have to remember bf 5 came out 2 to 3 years before vanguard.
For all weapon animations IW should get credit instead of sledgehammer as they themselves had declared that Vanguard runs of MW 19 engine but modified version
Hi👋 Why don't you want to take BF2042 or MW3? A good a number of players + support (however, in Battlefield it will no longer be content). If you, like me, are a huge fan of the World War 2, unfortunately, you have already missed the best parts of it in the Call of Duty series - WaW and WW2. In the Battlefield series, IMHO I don’t think 1942 is a good one. So, returning to the topic, as an avid fanboy of BF and COD, I’ll tell you that mechanically, gameplay-wise, graphically, stylistically, Vanguard and BF5 are the best in recent years. I would prefer BF5: the anti-cheat was recently updated, the online presence on PC is stable (more than 2042), the experience is as immersive as possible, quite a lot of equipment, maps (but no Eastern Front), cosand interaction, and so on. In Vanguard there is a more interesting gunsmith for weapons, many attachments are given for weapons, which is unrealistic, there is a lot of grind in general. There is a sticky zombie mode. There aren't too many players. In general it turns out like this. And don’t consider other World War II shooters (like Enlisted), they are all very low quality
yeah im huge fan of ww2 and i also too prefer bf5 over vanguard, i saw some mechanics and graphics between bf 5 and vanguard, bf 5 much better when ended watching he vid comparison@@dr.romanfell1933
I don't understand why people compare call of duty vanguard that has totally diffrent gameplay base, it's quick deathmatch with a fast gameplay while on the other hand battlefield 5 is based on historical accuracy and it has huge maps.It's totally diffrent.
In vanguard they removed certain features and didn’t add any new features other than destructible barriers and windows to make combat easier if you were to consider how unfair the warzone titles are with op weapons
What. Call of duty is made by various developers, some of whom are owned by activison. It’s not 5 people. 5 people could not pull off something on the level of call of duty. You need a huge developer, and a large publisher backing it. Same thing with battlefield. EA publishes it, doesn’t make it. DICE does that even though it’s owned by EA, the same can be said for infinity ward, one of the main Cod developers. It doesn’t matter how big the studio is. Look at 2042.
People hate when u shoot garnades out of the sky in bf1and 5 but thats why the shotgun was used in ww1 they mainly gave them to people that shot sporting clays or trap
both hold up well, for people that says battlefield v is way better, i cant agree anymore, the shadows in bfv doesnt have high resolution map even on ultra, some effects are ruined cuz of taa, reflection is a meh due to artifacts, lets exclude ray tracing... i see people here who say that bfv is better than cod are probably "youtube commenters" than people who actually played the game. tho im not saying battlefield v doesnt hold up this day.. its still a good game but defo not the best
I'd prefer to have them plough all the effort into better hit detection and gameplay, over most of these details that you never really notice during actual play... I'm more bothered by it taking 5 headshots to kill the guy with a sniper. I don't care how much detail his eyes have...🤦♂️
The problem with BFV wasn't the game itself. It was the time when it was released. After BF 3, BF 4 and BF 1 (ofc Hardline but be honest nobody takes this game seriously) People were hungry of another amazing game. The main problem was lack of content. Small amount of maps, shitty customization etc. Gameplay was still amazing and i loved it. Imagibe if we swapped BF V's and BF 2042's dates of release the game wold get reviews like: "after trash game BF 2042 next BF gets back what it used to be in the period of WW2. Of course if still think if in BF V we got more maps and more fronts like: all soviet fronts, Poland, Italy and more maps to every fron which has been added we would have another amazing BF.
Get Private Internet Access at 82% off with 3 bonus months: www.privateinternetaccess.com/StayFrosty
3:43 there should only be 4 rounds in the ec bloc clip cuz the 5th round is in the chamber and no way that 1 round can put itself back to place
There is a shock wave in call of duty. There always has been, it's just very subtle and hard to notice. If you're playing at a high frame rate and record at a high frame rate. You can slow it down and see it yourself.
or u can just use a free vpn like proton vpn lol
Also in bf5, as a sniper, getting multiple headshots in a row makes your character start to count them in their language. Only the headshots tho
I didn't notice this until I got like 5 kills, and then the sixth kill I got I heard the chick say 6.. And I realized that was 6 headshots I got 😅
Really? That’s amazing this is definitely the most underrated battlefield of the series.
I think the reason why it was underestimated is because the producer tried to release 2042 instead of being more interested in the game. It would be great if a little more attention was paid to it, for example, Russians were added, new game modes were added, servers for 128 people were opened, innovations such as filling while aiming were added. It's my favorite game of the series and it still has a great prone mechanic that many games don't have. A game with high potential. I wish the producers could see this too.@@drinknukacola5315
@@drinknukacola5315that’s hardline too also a very good shooter game loose the battlefield title and we have and awesome spin off
@@drinknukacola5315 that defines it as an underrated game for you?
the barrel smoke in bfv is more accurate, not all guns emit smoke after firing
I was going to say this. Most guns will emit a flash, as you can clearly see on the MP40. Not all guns will smoke afterwards.
True, for example if you shoot a 1845 Colt Navy, it’ll smoke more than a Glock 21, and if you shoot an GAU-8 Avenger Gatling Cannon it will smoke due to how fast the rounds are shot. EDIT: the 1845 is a black powder pistol.
BFV's sound design is where they literally peaked. I would be in a building with a teammate firing a bolt action, and the pop of his gun in the room would reverberate along the shell dropping on the wooden floor with its little bounce sounded so realistic. They manage to capture the perfect volume and effects for these to feel like you're in an indoor range without needing ear protection.
One of the reasons I play, just the sound alone is enough to make me flinch in my seat 😅
and the soldier screaming in bf1/bf5 was brutal
As time goes on, people will realize how criminally underrated BFV was.
It was never underrated. It was rated well
@@noobplaysark1318 no, BFV is one of the best WW2 games (maybe the best one)
@@pabloolivares7425 its not the best but its good
@@fladigman9763 battlefield games have something special, his ambient, the frenetic gameplay... Is just so cool and awesome to play
World at War is one of the best WW2 games i.m.p.
battlefield V is also just more diverse, with planes and tanks, you have to be strategic, and the game is full of little gimmicks, historical references (example: devastation is rotterdam, and the raid bomber raid that can rarely happen is based on the bombing of rotterdam, and has the cathedral in it) many of the locations are historically accurate, and the guns all look and sound good. vanguard has a few references, but not nearly as much as BFV, and is overall in between bad and mediocre.
I think it all depends on what you prefer in terms of playstyle.
You are very much correct, BF V is more diverse and strategic, however, I've spent maybe 20 hours on BFV since it came out and have ground out every single gun in Vanguard to max weapon level, BF V may be more diverse but Vanguard just has more replayability to me, doesn't get boring as quickly.
Notice how the soldier looks away from his target when aiming down the sights at 3:32 also you can swim in Battlefield V and for some reason, you can swim in the previous COD game but not in Vanguard
Because water was actually a part of the game in the previous cod. They've had swimming in bo3, bo4, advanced warfare.
@@twodollarking8009 also cold war
Best explaination for ya:
Back in 2013, BF4 built on BF3's swim system by including being able to shoot a pistol as well as diving. CoD capitalized on this with the release of Advanced Warfare by Sledgehammer Games in 2014, which allowed a similar system but it was more of a gimmick and the movement felt more free. In 2015, Treyarch made BO3 which boasted the advanced and crazy movement, and basically just made water a playable space. They then recycled the animations, physics, and effects across BO4(2018) and BOCW(2021). But SHG introduced direct water combat to CoD, why doesn't Vanguard have it? Well, AW was on the older CoD engine, and they have since updated to the engine that MW2019 has, which probably doesn't support water combat physics.
@@twodollarking8009 also in cod ghosts i believe,in the flooded map or any maps with water
@@spartacussmith7070 yeah
13:02 You CAN peek in BFV. When you aim at a ledge at a certain angle your soldier will sway his gun to the side indicating you can peek, in which you can ADS to do so. This also applies to horizontal cover blocking your view, you can also set a bind to manually lean so you don't have to position yourself to auto-lean.
Honestly, in the state BF5 is in rn, I can say that it didn't deserve all the hate it got in the past 4 years. The maps are beautiful, the guns sound amazing, sniping is so satisfying, planes feel great, tanks feel great, gunplay is smooth, plenty of guns (though not as much as battlefield 4, probably due to there not being that many ww2 suitable guns), and it's just a blast with friends. Its a great game once you get past some bugs here and there. Glad to see that it's still holding up well
@The Apple Of Judgement I'm well aware of that. That's my only main gripe. It's no reason to hate on the game
Tanks are not that good. A tiger tank can die in 3 shots by a sherman
@The Apple Of Judgement its not hate on vets? Its a Video game.
@The Apple Of Judgement atleast its not some generic "hero and sacrifice always needed and works bla bla we're the hero bcs we save people and country bla bla bla" Moments its more bad than redheaded girl with robot arm bcs its always the american and its allies as heroes and axis as villains even though both of them not even a hero they're just a villain that is greedy for lands and materials, they atleast makes it more variable, more fun, its a game not a documentary or even real life, a game is where we have fun(some for exercising ur heart and tells stories of some people) not a documentaries kind.
@I hate myself it’s so unfair bro how can a tank die in 3 shots
Even though it came out 4 years ago, Battelfield 5 is still better than the newest COD entry’s
We can agree both of them is better than Defectfield 2042
Can he beat? Modern warfare
@@norbertosodoy3771 bf5 is set in ww2 and cod mw is set in modern so it's difficult to compare
@@puzzle_girl47 vanguard has better gameplay and sound design but brother the graphics in vanguard are awful.
@@norbertosodoy3771 Yes it does best MW in attention to detail, graphics, optimization, performance, animations (you can argue for reloading animations)
Also, something as simple as snow falling off the roof in Battlefield 5 is so satisfying
man it hurts my soul to see that BFV was left in a somewhat unfinished state. It has over time gotten pretty good gameplaywise and I'm shure that it is still fun to play. Unfortunately, content about eastern front and d-day are some essential things that are missing, therefore it just feels incomplete in my eyes...such a shame it did not live to the legacy of the masterpiece it could have become. Probably, the damage was already irreversable from the day it released.
Recent cod reviews:
Vanguard- 6/10
Cold War- 7/10
Warzone-9.5/10
Modern Warfare-9/10
Bo4-4/10
WWII-8/10
How did cold war get a higher rating than vanguard?
@@csupidavid Vanguard was very unnecessary because we just got a ww2 game in 2017. Also, Cold War has a great campaign and, in my opinion, better zombies. As for multiplayer, both are as toxic as the other and though it is definitely not like that mw2 lobby where your mother was the main topic, both games’ multiplayer is similar.
@@csupidavid úgy barát hogy ez a legjobb cod ezek közül. A vanguard egy szar de az mw se túl jó csak tulertekelt
@@bryceparrish09 in my opinion mw is overrated while cold war is underrated
@@kristofletai6999 game still trash tbh
12:47 you can actually peek, but not with the door. Just hold the gun and aim at the angle next to the door and the soldier will peek based on your mouse hover. This was even in Battlefield 1.
How quickly the soldier snaps his head at the explosion and back is creepy af.
Interestingly the weapons get muddy in WW2 but not in Vanguard
I think it was more of an artistic choice because Vanguard feels a lot more clean and alternate history while cod World War II acts more dirty and the war is the main subject
@@1upproductions423 Developer laziness = Artistic choice ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@@1upproductions423 Also, historical accuracy seems like an afterthought in Vanguard, or at least not a main goal. They're now adding less WW2 guns and some sequences in the campaign are plain non realistic.
@@fabiandrinksmilk6205 every game doesn’t have to be more historically accurate you goofball
@@1upproductions423some of it has to do with the WW2 engine having more impressive material systems than the Modern Warfare/Vanguard engine. It’s a shame that branch of the COD engine is being thrown away as the developers all pivot to the MWII engine since that WW2 engine broke a lot of technical ground in rendering for COD.
Battlefield 5 was very bad in terms of concept at the time of release, but it has game mechanics and really elaborated content. Battlefield 5 is being played a lot these days because the expansion packs that came later added a character to the game. But when we look at Battlefield 2042, I see that it has turned into a simplified game that lacks the little details we see in Battlefield games, both in terms of concept and game mechanics. I hope this only applies to one game.
Nah btf 2042 isn't considered a btf game for me, there's just no actual battlefield vibe to it
@@boy--kisser the game is well made for a fan made game lol
@@pinecat3594 i wish it was a fan made
I love your videos man keep them up
Thanks man
One thing thats interesting is that you can see that a lot of the firing animations in bfv have the reciprocating charging handles/motions not timed properly with firing. Not sure if this is an artistic change thats meant to keep it looking smoother.
Would also be nice to see an upclose comparison of the details/textures of the weapons between the game.
An interesting aspect in regards to the audio for ejected shells is that both bfv and bf2042 (and probably older games too) simply just play a specific sound file based on where you are standing, there is no directionality at all or any other logic, it just plays a sound a set time after firing.
Something I think is overlooked is that battlefield 5 multiplayer tries to make you feel like a brand new GI however vanguard makes you takes control of a highly trained professional and that’s why bf5 is more immersive!
I can't believe why you don't have 1m subscribe
Love the vid as usual, keep up the good work.
Glad you enjoy it!
@@Stay_Frosty as always.
As cod fan vanguard is literally killing call of duty
The alternate cod Universe that war zone spawned in is killing Cod
1:55 It looks less like she's trying to point her gun in a safe direction and more like she's scared and saying "Please don't hit me."
i also (just) noticed that in BF5 when the character replaces the mg42 barrel instead of grabbing the hot barrel with their hand (i mean why would you) they use a shell cassing
In Vanguard when grenades are being thrown, the operators would call them out. You should have an enemy player throw a grenade at you and hear their responses.
All in all bf has always been better but cod surprised me in this video I haven’t played cod since aw but I definitely didn’t expect some of the detail in vanguard
13:00 Battlefield has no peek mechanic instead you can just blow up the whole fuckin building
BF5 is a masterpiece cinematic underrated game
I think for the vanguard m1 garand when you fire 5 bullets, it doesn’t keep all 3 in the clip since in order to open the internal magazine it has to eject one bullet. Idk if I’m 100 percent correct but I just wanted to point out that it might not be as accurate.
This is correct. Somehow in battlefield v the garand manages to eject the live round in the chamber perfectly back into the clip as its being ejected.
@@johntravoltage959 Yea I noticed that black magic lol
If you're wondering, you must first nest the text layer, then apply the transform effect
Another thing is that in BF5, if there’s an explosion that really hurts but doesn’t kill you, your character will cuss or react in their language (like if you’re British and this happens I’ve heard my soldier go “shit!” quite a few times lol and I’ve heard German soldiers say the same thing in German)
8:31 I saw some water dripping down on his helmet. :O
3:50 BFV has some amazing details
Except for the fact that theres plenty of documentation, training manuals from the time period, and people replicating it today that show that garand thumb isn't a thing that happens when you load a full clip. It happens when you are messing around with the rifle without a clip in it, or if you very carefully set it up.
Alongside that the garands ammo count in bfv is wrong. 8 round clip, fire 3 rounds. 4 in the clip and 1 in the chamber, when they open it and eject clip it manages to somehow put the round in the chamber back in the clip?
@@johntravoltage959 brother you can’t have 8 + 1 in the chamber with an m1 garand. Brother you might be the stupidest person I’ve seen all week. And garant thumb literally can happen, if you do it right it won’t but on a war zone, there’s a high chance of it happening.
I believe both games have great little details. though I think both franchises are in a bad spot right now, I hope as a battlefield fan both COD and BF get better again. Let’s get back into our friendly rivalry! :)
I very much agree with this opinion as a Battlefield Boy
I wish we could but it's kinda hard when btf 2042 is an absolute dumpster fire and a lot of cod fanboys, unlike you, a very respectful person, they just destroy you because of 2042 :( i want to go back in time
there might be some similiarities but the biggest difference is, I can run battlefield V but not vanguard
3:12 you know what you should test? shining a flashlight into a man's eyes in a dark area, and seeing if their eyes adjust
Batlefield 5 Win brutal 👌
Still, I'm spending countless hours on vanguard (not on BFV...)
@@Medzo2 why? Lmfao that game is shit
@@sgtmonkeypirate I guess, shit to you is fun to others 🤷♂️ just give people a break and do what you like. Nobody cares at the end of the day. Some will enjoy, some will hate. Live your life and give others a damn break 😁 vanguard lobby's are full !
@@Medzo2 don’t care + didn’t ask. No really, who cares that you play vanguard but not V here ?
@@melcorchancla9431 Hi Mr Nobody, who asked you? No one...so go play whatever you want, or don't want, the world won't notice at all 😬
At 8:30 in the video we can notice the explosion will make the water land on the soldiers helmet.
I’m sure most people have noticed but the quality of games has been rapidly decreasing and I think it started with COD: Cold War because that was the beginning of where people thought they could just start pumping out games and not putting proper quality and detail and making the next game worse than the last. Cold War came out in half of the time COD games normally take to create (2 years) which made it only half as good. If Treyarch took more time on their game it would have been possibly the best COD game to hit.
It was originally shg’s game. But due to mass disagreements during game development, Treyarch had to take over a game they had to redo from almost scratch
I like how many people saying CoD is best of most games, but it lacks a lot of open world stuff.
In bf5 with the lee enfold the way they hold it by the trigger is historically accurate. Idk how to describe it but they held it like that so the can reload faster in irl. ( look it up)
They hold on the bolt while firing so they can easily cock it
Well, actually with the M1-Garand, they both got it wrong. After he fires 3 rounds, there should only be 4 rounds in the clip (yes, it's actually called a clip in this instance...) since one round was in the chamber that would have ejected. But also, there's nothing really holding the rounds in the clip when it's not full so they wouldn't have stayed attached to it anyway...
In Battlefield V the M8 Greyhound also has a shimmering effect over the engine
Thar might be the gas emitting from the engine
@@SlyCooper1920 no It's direktly above the vents under which the engine is. But it could be gas.
The devs at sledge took those military vets complaints of always keeping your weapon pointed forward seriously
most people compare things like guns stats and different vehicles in games but nah my man is out here with "boom" and "ouch"
Vanguard has better looking character models with softer skin. The only thing that is graphically better looking in bfv is the iris.
Pour les personnages je suis d accord pour se qui et du reste , que se soit graphimes , son , Battelfield 5 et au dessus
Lmao nice lies brother
Give me any footage of vanguard that doesn’t look like a PS3 game and looks better than this ua-cam.com/video/jbRig-bTMaU/v-deo.html
Soldiers in World War II would not have soft skin after even a few days of combat. Most soldiers in that war were incredibly young, yet in Vanguard, they all look like they’re 30 or 40
I don't know how having a babyface in a warzone is aesthetically better even if it's graphically superior
When you get down on the icy ground and crawl and then stand you will notice the ice on your clothes if you are only in Battlefield V.
One thing to note is also during the iris comparison you can see that the soldier’s face in bfv is dirty which makes more sense while the soldier in vanguard has a clean face
The glass streaks aren't from cleaning, old school glass panes had imperfections in them, especially in areas that were more remote because they rarely had talented artisans
2:11
Why is this so funny lmao
I play Battlefield Vietnam (yeah, I know. Dont judge) It does have its fair share of bugs, but overall it's a good game. The only problem I have is that on the AK style guns, weapons bolt and firing selector are on the left side, not the right. Coolest part is that sometimes, not often, if you shoot the M-16 enough, it will jam. Also, I have no mods. My
Linux OS wont let put them on my computer.
10:50 interesting detail, it’s weird how they both got barrel smoke wrong, it’s not a puff of smoke, it’s more like a cigarette. One thin line of smoke, like csgo
As far as I've seen, CoD is focused on gameplay orianted details while Battlefield is more of a Physics oriated build
11:19 "you cant hear the bullets bouncing of the wall"
*standing outside not next to a wall*
11:26
3:11 what's detail??
Explosions near or in the water cause drops of water to fall from both the soldiers' uniforms and helmets, minute 8:30 and 8:40
Also the third person animations of the soldiers are exceptionally well done, base on position, are interactive with water and others stuff like being close to other's characters, or structures, having different grounds and else.
Vanguard character are just built different. They don't scared about explosive blowing them up. They're even can destroy doorknob by just throwing equipments.
"built different" lol ok kid
Lmao good jokes
I do believe shimmering exists in the campaign in el alamein. Could be wrong about that, but i am not surprised that vanguard has on average less attention to detail in the smaller things. But more on the bigger things. Like grenades rolling off uneven terrain or gun moving out of the way, it did have a awful development run and it was plagued with problems, so in not frankly surprised its lacking in a ton of aspects compared to a finished game.
I think many details are left overs from MW2019 because they use the same engine. MW2019 is surprisingly detailed and realistic so it's almost obvious they would use the engine again.
Granades rolling down slopes is a gameplay feature not detail
the best - im from KSA🇸🇦❤️
حبيبي تحياتي لك من الجزائر أهل السعودية احلى ناس
@@abdouu2271 احلى شعب الجزائر🇩🇿 ❤️🇸🇦
I think vanguard should be renamed to Battlefield 5 Lite
Opposite actually 😂
@@arneshpal7702 hahahaha no.
There is no chaos like this in vanguard ua-cam.com/video/KFhU3ZA0zBk/v-deo.html
No graphics like this ua-cam.com/video/jbRig-bTMaU/v-deo.html
No team play, no graphics, no sound design, everything is shit, modern warfare is way better.
@@arneshpal7702 not really
2:23 BFV does the m1 bazooka better than vanguard but the bazooka has almost no recoil at all, also you can't push the projectile all the way into the rocket. Vanguard badly over exaggerates the recoil, both games forget to pull the wire before launching.
El detállate de la M1 garand de BFV está muy muy padre, se le atora el dado al cambiar el cartucho como pasaba en la vida real, por eso mucho soldados tenían el dedo machucado al usar esa arma
battlefield v is a clear example that 2042 did not have to be nearly as bad as it was/still is
I have played a ton of cod and battlefield but I just enjoy battlefield so much more with BF4 being my favorite I had so much fun and soon many memories with BF4 on the ps3
I thinl battlefield 5 is still better but when comes to the bullets and hearing them bounce off diffrent things and some of the very minor details we have to remember bf 5 came out 2 to 3 years before vanguard.
For all weapon animations IW should get credit instead of sledgehammer as they themselves had declared that Vanguard runs of MW 19 engine but modified version
That has nothing to do with the animations, sledgehammer still had to make them.
Wtf does game engine have to do with animations quality lmao?
BattleGOD V all my life ❤️
hi i am currently eating a waffle
Thanks, I actually needed to know that.
can confirm, i am the waffle being eaten
oh god help me i am being consumed as i speak
Thanks man, i need to eat some too.
*snap* nice
hi im doing something
How impressive is BF 5... And it runs so damn smooth
I play BF5 to chill it’s a really fun game dk how they ruined 2042
If only BFV did a good job with historical accuracy... this game could have been awesome
It's just that windows are washed more often in Vanguard)
Maybe they just cleaned the glass really well in vanguard🧐
guys by the end of school year im getting ps4 so wich game do u suggest me to buy? i like em both so its hard to decide
Hi👋 Why don't you want to take BF2042 or MW3? A good a number of players + support (however, in Battlefield it will no longer be content). If you, like me, are a huge fan of the World War 2, unfortunately, you have already missed the best parts of it in the Call of Duty series - WaW and WW2. In the Battlefield series, IMHO I don’t think 1942 is a good one. So, returning to the topic, as an avid fanboy of BF and COD, I’ll tell you that mechanically, gameplay-wise, graphically, stylistically, Vanguard and BF5 are the best in recent years. I would prefer BF5: the anti-cheat was recently updated, the online presence on PC is stable (more than 2042), the experience is as immersive as possible, quite a lot of equipment, maps (but no Eastern Front), cosand interaction, and so on. In Vanguard there is a more interesting gunsmith for weapons, many attachments are given for weapons, which is unrealistic, there is a lot of grind in general. There is a sticky zombie mode. There aren't too many players. In general it turns out like this. And don’t consider other World War II shooters (like Enlisted), they are all very low quality
yeah im huge fan of ww2 and i also too prefer bf5 over vanguard, i saw some mechanics and graphics between bf 5 and vanguard, bf 5 much better when ended watching he vid comparison@@dr.romanfell1933
People : COD is better
Other people : no battlefield is
Me that just want to play both of them : 😅👆
Was that finger stuck animation in battlefield v real?
Yeah, i even got It.
8:19 in Cod WW2 is present this detail .-.
I think grenades not rolling in bf5 might be on purpose to make them more predictable
Awesome Gameplay 😊
I don't understand why people compare call of duty vanguard that has totally diffrent gameplay base, it's quick deathmatch with a fast gameplay while on the other hand battlefield 5 is based on historical accuracy and it has huge maps.It's totally diffrent.
Historical Accuracy? Lol
@@danukakavishan4645 yes
None of this games are historically accurate
@@ToughChap you're delusional
@@Gonnie6969 well count me among the delusionals too 🤷♂️
I love how you can hear the shell hitting the floor whilst it's still visibly flying through the air in BFV xD
“Peak feature isn’t available in battlefield” proceeds to make own door 🚪
In vanguard they removed certain features and didn’t add any new features other than destructible barriers and windows to make combat easier if you were to consider how unfair the warzone titles are with op weapons
i dont really like vangyard since im a campain player first and multiplayer secind but i can accept the work they did great video tho
This is unfair on cod, bf is made by EA a massive company but cod is made by a tiny company with 5 employees and is definitely not a huge company
what
What. Call of duty is made by various developers, some of whom are owned by activison. It’s not 5 people. 5 people could not pull off something on the level of call of duty. You need a huge developer, and a large publisher backing it.
Same thing with battlefield. EA publishes it, doesn’t make it. DICE does that even though it’s owned by EA, the same can be said for infinity ward, one of the main Cod developers.
It doesn’t matter how big the studio is. Look at 2042.
Looks like people can't tell that this is a funny joke
This joke was so bad that people thought he was serious
@@danielsong4778 😐
Is comparing singleplayer details valid when you compare it with multiplayer which of course will be less detailed due server issues ?
vanguard is like battlefield v in very low quality
actually in the other way around, vanguard has higher texture resolution, higher shadow resolution maps
@@marcm.official but doesn't look like it does, because of shitty AA, so point still stands
Arma 4 has the most realistic weapon physics of all other games I’ve played
How to make a Vanguard player cry when you’re a Battlefield player
Say *Atleast we can swin unlike yoy*
Yeah and they will cry even harder when they find out that bf 2042 (2021), Black Ops Cold War (2020) and the upcoming MW2 (2022) has swimming.
People hate when u shoot garnades out of the sky in bf1and 5 but thats why the shotgun was used in ww1 they mainly gave them to people that shot sporting clays or trap
why I'd there recoil on the RPGs?
Because RPGs have recoil? Isnt that obvious
both hold up well, for people that says battlefield v is way better, i cant agree anymore, the shadows in bfv doesnt have high resolution map even on ultra, some effects are ruined cuz of taa, reflection is a meh due to artifacts, lets exclude ray tracing... i see people here who say that bfv is better than cod are probably "youtube commenters" than people who actually played the game. tho im not saying battlefield v doesnt hold up this day.. its still a good game but defo not the best
yeah but lets be honest bf5 is better than cod
Vanguard is the worst then, no?
@@riezki4086 nothing is better and worse, i can admit that vanguard's graphics can beat bfv on some aspects, same goes to bfv
I'd prefer to have them plough all the effort into better hit detection and gameplay, over most of these details that you never really notice during actual play...
I'm more bothered by it taking 5 headshots to kill the guy with a sniper. I don't care how much detail his eyes have...🤦♂️
Yeah lol this is useless
vanguard soldierwhen you get to close: AHH GET AWAY FROM ME
battle field soldiers: (put night sounds here)
7:51 один xyй??
The problem with BFV wasn't the game itself. It was the time when it was released. After BF 3, BF 4 and BF 1 (ofc Hardline but be honest nobody takes this game seriously) People were hungry of another amazing game. The main problem was lack of content. Small amount of maps, shitty customization etc. Gameplay was still amazing and i loved it. Imagibe if we swapped BF V's and BF 2042's dates of release the game wold get reviews like: "after trash game BF 2042 next BF gets back what it used to be in the period of WW2. Of course if still think if in BF V we got more maps and more fronts like: all soviet fronts, Poland, Italy and more maps to every fron which has been added we would have another amazing BF.
Vanguard is like codm but reskinned
did you really just say that
@@Venzelli Yeah, so?
@@jaydenvenegas8105 vanguard aint a reskinned codm bro you got it all reversed
@@Venzelli oh no it was a joke
战地V注重还原战争样貌，COD更多的是竞技性
Compare a battlefield I don't know which 1 to call of duty world war 2 Think that would be interesting
The developers that made B5 really made Vanguard a joke.