You're not supposed to close an eye unless you're shooting at longer ranges through a scope, in the military they taught us to shoot with both eyes open so that's actually an inaccuracy that cod got right
@@0326Vet nono i know that having both eyes open with a close range optic is a better way to do it, what I was pointing out is that the cold War player model doesn't even look in the direction they're aiming at all
@@0326Vet I'm not sure how well you can see it in the video but I've seen other videos where the character literally looks like 90° away from where he is actively shooting
Not to mention that with all the battlefield's wonderful engine and smooth game. The game only 44gb while cod:cw is 180gb. Basically they don't know how to optimize the damn game.
@@A_Stranger2256 true, especially the semi-changing of Operation Gunnerside (what the "Nordlys" war story is loosely based on) and several cosmetics (Willhelm Tannstedt). Otherwise, pretty decent game
Yeah bf5 was beautiful and I liked the game but all their woke shit ruined the game for me also the hit markers where kinda annoying even tho I know they have been in every battlefield I just wish the guns felt more real and powerful.
@@reggiestockton8166 true bf1 was amazing but I still like seeing planes fly above me and other details so I still play bf5 every so often but only to look around.
@@iDayVids What are y'all saying? Both are terrible games compared to their predecessors however Cold War has probably by now outsold BFV and even though CW won't last , BFV also didnt. It died 2 years after launch... CW probably will die this year or the year after. Either way both are terrible games relative to their predecessors.
@@thocka5144 i actually played couple days ago and Yea.. it was Bad, little too effort on the story and too short, i like the maps design tho, bf3 had better campaign for sure, but still like bf4 tho! Multiplayer gets a 10
If you wanna talk about a Battlefield game that was ahead of it's time, it was definitely BF3. When that came out in 2011.. man there was no other game as detailed and realistic looking as that. Seeing the tracers coming out of weapons and the destructions. That was insane.
All I can say is the Frostbite engine was ahead of its time. Bringing you more immersion. Let's see what the next Battlefield can bring to the table. I cant wait...
Almost every (or every) walls in CoD can't even be destroyed, while in battlefield you can even blow up a building or even tear down a whole skyscrapers.
I loved Modern Warfare's attention to detail when it came out and the direction cod was taking but for me I lost ALL hype again when I saw Cold War. Just felt like every cod game before again.. Back to BF it is this year again boys!
Modern Warfare was so terrible. I've played every COD since 4 religiously and the multiplayer was God awful. And Warzone was the worst experience I've ever had playing a BR. But hey, to each their own. Warzone was the last straw for me with COD. They proved where their priorities lay and it's not with pleasing their community. I'm never touching COD again. At least until new devs get hold of it.
@@AdiSidiq MW is actual garbage. The engine is good, but the camping, mounting, camo challenges, side modes, scorestreaks, maps, and basically everything else is trash. Every player on that game hasn't showered in years judging by how sweaty they are, and everyone posts up and mounts at a core area of the map with a literal 0 recoil weapon. Everyone i know hates the game and has no fun in it, including me
I went back to BF5 and BF1 after playing warzone and modern warfare for some time. I was shocked how beautiful these games and how more advanced their graphics are in comparison to the newer COD. Of course the feel and immersiveness is on another level also...
And they run so smooth. Nobody talks about how fluid BF1/V is compared to MW19 and CW. I’m on console and I seem to always get the max available fps in BF games vs COD where it struggles to keep up.
Or just don't play on PC lol... hacking and cheaters aren't nearly as big an issue on console. And series X has all the power and benefits of a PC. Especially once BF2042 comes out since it's optimized for next-gen.
@@thocka5144 It got a lot of hate at launch due to the way it was presented and advertised. Don't think many people were impressed by the war stories (campaigns), some thought it was lacking a bit of content at launch but after the Pacific Storm update, many players came back and enjoyed it.
@@crowgoesskwaa This is my first BF and installed it 3 days ago. I find lobbies without a problem still even after 2 years so I was surprised that this game was so much hate
@@crowgoesskwaa the only thing I hate about this game is after you die you have to wait and wait and that’s annoying especially you get angry after many deaths and the waiting game is like salt in the wound
@@drgreencabral3001 I think that's a good thing, cod is more fast paced and bf won't be able to take that from them easily but they do amazing with aesthetics
They are two completely different game styles. If I want realistic war shooter, I'll play Arma. If I want competitive team play, I go to rainbow six. If I want fast arcade shooter to chill, I play cod. That's why I actually like cold war more than modern warfare. The graphics and detail are not as good, but there aren't doors and camp spots up the ying yang like MW. MW was pretty, but catered to a more tactical slow play style that just isn't cod.
Probably the funniest part of this video for me was shooting grenades to detonate them midair. The battlefield side was fine but the call of duty side cracked me up. You can’t detonate grenades by shooting them but you can detonate C4? C4 is really stable. It will not explode if shot. You can even burn it and it won’t explode. It’s the electrical current that makes it go off. It was just funny because they got it exactly wrong for both C4 and grenades lol.
I find this hilarious that they're comparing a 2017 game to a 2021 game. It's just proves furthermore that battlefield Cares more about its game and doesn't just produce crap for money.
@imagine Jars bf dropped in close to an unplayable state without Americans, horrible maps, horrible severs, and no real campaign. I could care less about how my feet sit on the ground or how the wind blows when I fart… ohh let’s not forget bf 2042 is dripping with 6 maps and a hand full of gamemodes and that’s it there’s ur $60-$70. How tf u even gonna say cod just putts out stuff for money and not look at ur own game dummy. Wake up every video game company out there that costs for their game (other than single player games) is a money grab. Y do u think all the good games are free to play?
@@TheBeast-ts2qp 7 maps and a handful of game modes are enough to keep us entertained until they start releasing more stuff with their seasons. I can’t speak for cod but I’d definitely rather have 7 maps that feel like an open world sandbox arena than 8 tiny maps at launch.
@@TheBeast-ts2qp one of the maps is bigger than a pubg map. And then there’s 5 other maps to go along with it and then probably more just a couple months after launch. A couple of game modes is literally all battlefield players have needed for the past 10 years because of the sandbox experience. As for the ‘money grab’, at least the devs look at the small details which you need for immersion and soul (which COD has none of). Imagine being a game developer and having less dignity than EA. That says a lot about Infinity Ward or whoever the fuck is running the COD franchise.
Idk if you knew but there are three teams that work on cod so they get the same time as battlefield to make games and still can't get attention to detail
@@pinheadlarry7335 Call of duty is much faster paced than battlefield, therefore attention to small detail isn't as big of a priority. To be honest, I personally don't give a shit about any of it other than I'd like to see call of duty have destructible buildings/walls.
@@SteelWorksGuy nah that's the one thing I don't like being compared to bf. If cods maps were destructible then the flow of each map would be even worse than it already is, unless they can pull it off ofc. But after seeing the new games my hope for them being able to isn't high
no no, it shows how in cold war he grabs magazine with bullets and saves it but in bf5 he throws both magazines with bullets and empty magazines on ground.
I have both the games each game had its flaws but I personally prefer BFV over CW. The details dont really matter to me that much but what really downgrades CW is the skill based matchmaking. Thats why BF is way more fun to me... Each round you have a new challenge when there are players better than you but that really helps you to get better too
@@catboy3471 the gameplay, fun, and things I can do in BF is 100 times more than any CoD title ever… lol The new CoD boasts weather and minor destruction LOL… oh my BF has been doing like serious weather and destruction for a DECADE lol FACTS And you speak of “relevance”?? WTF lol Gotta love that CoD boy ignorance and blind bias Btw I used to be a CiMoD brainwashed game me just like you years ago before I go educated
@@catboy3471 LOLOLOL ahhhh the ignorance again lol FACT: CoD sells more because like McDonalds it has a larger audience I.e. more children and younger demographics… another analogy… Toyota sells more cars a year than Ferrari, but that certainly doesn’t make the Toyota better than the Ferrari!! Lol BF has more adults where CoD has more children… look it up genius I don’t care about sales because I don’t work for EA/Dice so it makes no difference to me… I make no profit lol I care about quality and gameplay, long term playability, vehicles, dedicated servers, massive destruction, larger player counts, server browsers in game, teamwork, squadding up together with friend, massive explosions, flying helicopters and jets, driving tanks, bringing buildings down for campers who hide in them, having actual gravity in a game so sniping is more skill based, and on and on… Things CoD cannot provide… Anyway bottom line is PLEEEEASE stay playing CoD and do not come to BF although I know millions of CoD fans are going to come over and play 2042, get their butt spanked and then back back to the kiddie version to CoD lol
the details have nothing to do with the output frequency of a game, the developers could easily put all these details, but it would be a wrong thing to do, because they would make cod much uglier, and above all it would no longer be the cod that we all know, and the details do not make a game more better than another, also because it seems to me that lately cod has been more successful than bf5
@@WilliamHoskins08 I just got back into it earlier today, and it is a very good breath of fresh air from the current directions FPS games are going. Don’t just hate on it, give it a little chance.
@@appleater787 I mean he is not wrong to give hate as battlefield fans always trash on CoD for its lack of attention of detail even though both are have good gameplay
@@frankwoods9772 the only cod I respect was the mw series, CW ruins warzone and other shit, got janky ass animation, lack of sound design, etc. Honestly it's a step down from mw19, just pure dissapointment
Fun fact: 1:50 This feature is called inverse kinematics, & usually used in games for walking (the only use I’ve seen so far). Basically, your computer tells a, let’s say foot, to go to a specific coordinate. Then, the computer will rotate & move the leg for the program, instead of you manually animating it in a(n) animation software/game engine. Correct me if I’m wrong. I don’t know much about IK, I’ve only seen use for it in game development.
Rushed production and barely enough time and having to work at home. Infinity Ward usually have it better to these scenarios with having more time, a bigger budget, and they didn’t have corona then. Meanwhile, Treyarch gets there balls strangled for the past couple years with Activison at least they tried 😔
@@tjgamin3045 It's a combination of two things mainly: 1. Unless you're sniping, your brain has an easier time lining up shots quickly with both eyes open, something to do with depth perception and the way your brain is designed to process information. 2. Combat awareness, so you can always see everything at all times, since the US doctrine is suppressive fire followed by heavy weapons fire it allows for soldiers to be more aware of their surroundings and snap to a target they might not have seen otherwise, and again it makes it faster to aim at such ranges accurately.
Also in BF 5 you can reload a specific gun that still has full rounds in the magazine,instead of saying "30" in the magazine it says "31" because of the one round that is still in the chamber of the gun
Cold War is such a lazily made game it’s actually incredible. I only play it for the zombies because MW is so much better it’s hard to think that Cold War preceded it.
The way I see it, Cold War is more arcade-esque whereas Battlefield V is simulation-themed, where they can fit more details. Both games have their ups and downs, and I like them both for what they are.
@@baseddrugdealer5086 Again, what the hell is so "simulation-themed" about those aspects? Warzone had a larger map than any Battlefield map ever, so I guess CoD is more "simulation-themed"? Call of Duty puts just as much effort and detail to its weapons and gunplay (since MW2019 anyway) as Battlefield does. Oh, and BFV outfits? "SImulation-themed'? Please.
Even in a BFV tactical reload, the bullets are kept in your inventory while the mags are dumped. And in WW2, there were tactical reloads, just wasn't practiced among soldiers who carried clips instead of mags.
I mean, you can do a tactical reload with any gun that has a magazine. I’ve tested every single gun out in the game and there’s a number of different guns with different reload animations based on how many rounds are left in a magazine, tho not all guns have them. The ones I can recall are the Bren gun, 1911 and type 99
@@kobi7955 What the hell are you saying? No it isn't , it's historical revisionism , it's set in WW2 , the soldiers use rifles from WW2 and the factions are from WW2 , so are the locations. Damn man , you're coping so hard...
@@thishandleisnotavaliable Return to Castle Wolfenstein also had all of that and that's an alternate take on WW2 Edit: Inglorious Bastards too Edit Part II: Also in the universe that BFV takes place in the military had no problem with recruiting women into the army as standard infantry units while IRL they were only really prevalent in the medical field as nurses or scouts/snipers in the red army which makes it an alternate take on WW2 like I said
There's no correlation there because CODs engine can handle large maps much better than Frostbite's, the playerbase just hates them becasue it removes all competitive elements from the gameplay. Warzone, locked 60fps even on last gen console and a map twice the size of Battlefield's largest map, and with over twice the playercount performs well
But to spend 60 on campaign for a mediocre game like cod... why? Youre pissing your money away for an unoriginal story and the same copy paste formula thats been prevalent for years now.
@@travissmith5945 I know that COD is just a mediocre game, but im always buy it when the price is getting lower. Tho im curiosity with the story even its unoriginal, especially for my brother that love to play FPS game. My bad if my english's broken
You have a point with everything but closing one eye for aiming. Both got it correct considering by the time of the Cold War militaries were training their soldiers to shoot with both eyes open because it was found to be more accurate.
@@untrust2033 "this character is latin american and we really need to hammer it to the players, have them say something in mexican or what ever language they speak there" - the Devs probably
10:15 You’re supposed to keep both eyes open no matter what you’re shooting. COD got that right, but maybe people closing their eyes back then was historically accurate which would be a point for Battlefield.
@@RacBack_ First, learn English. Second, learn how to handle guns safely. Third, learn how to shoot. There’s only one way to shoot and it’s with both eyes open.
Actually no, i had practiced with guns for a while and I can say there's a big difference between one eye and 2, with one you can focus on your target perfectly but at the same time you can't see your surroundings fully, while with both eyes (unless you're ultra trained) you won't be able to focus on your target nor your aim but rather your surroundings cause your eyes cannot focus on various things at a time, only one of them
Bfv is such a older game too and yet runs laps over Cold War it shows that if you put time and effort and thought into a game instead of chasing $ every year it can give you a beautiful game
Such an old game? It’s not even 3 years old yet! People like you are the reason CoD sucks. There’s a reason why they can keep put out lazy cash grab. Because people like you keep buying it!
Although bf throws an un-empty mag on the ground, reloading an un-empty gun will still give you +1 round. For ex: reloading a 30 round magazine give you 30+1 in the chamber= 31 rounds. Cod does not
*Fun fact* :- call of duty mobile actually shows 12 round in a revolver while reloading , while in cold war if u equip 12 round in holster there will only be 6 rounds
People seem to forget that its a completely different game, although having bullet deflection off surfaces is a very nice touch. Well done Battlefield.
the only thing keeping CoD from dying is warzone while the rest of CoD games just died within a year because it kept the same multiplayer count since CoD1 and an awesome single player campaign, meanwhile battlefield 3 and 4 which is 10 and 8 years old is still living strong and even more stronger after the battlefield 2024 hype
@@oxfordmule7472 oh yes thet DEFF FOCUS ON GUN BALANCING... My g, they nerfed the aug like 3 times and none of the nefts did shit to the gun, lets not talk about the dmr, mg82, or the ffar
@@delayedplayer No thanks im already tired of seeing people camping ofc you can get exciting games when people play seriously but i aint getting lucky.
As what i personally experience, cod games are built for arcade kind of gaming with some aspect of realism while battlefield bring an whole new level of realism and immersion in every released they made.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Vanguard vs Battlefield 5 - Attention to Detail & Graphics Comparison
ua-cam.com/video/yzO3SwkNh7M/v-deo.html
ok
Compare it to Modern Warfare 2019 instead
The thing about shooting bombs is stupid bombs in the cold war didnt just blow up like in ww2
Vanguard va battlefeild 2042
It’s OK to say that battlefield is better than Cold war
Another detail in bf v is when you are shooting a sniper rifle, the soldier count how many shots you have done.
Try to do it so many times ended up dieing everytime 😅
11:04
@@DatStapleBoi yep
Not how many shot but how many kills, I think it starts at 4
I think it is actually when you get headshots only
In battlefield v your gun can also get bloody when shooting people at close range.
@Anti Degenerate Get Out Now
I’ve seen this in the campaign a lot
Edit: it also happens with melee weapons
If you shoot People from close range then you are a sweat.
@Anti Degenerate pudo ser peor
@@epistimonkapetanios I bayonet people, soooooo
In the previous one, MW2019 VS BF1 it was actually pretty close, they both had great attention to detail. But this wasnt even close haha.
Agreed
BFV won for sure
@@Name-ke6sf bf5 sucked and most of the battlefield fans agree
@@WilliamHoskins08 As a BF player, I can confirm, it was complete ass.And that's putting it lightly
@@WilliamHoskins08 lol I love the game, sure beats cod. Been here since launch and ill be here til 2042 and even after
BF5 may not have been the best battlefield game but it has some incredible details. Really shows how good the frostbite engine is
Yep, dice put in alot of detail to the game, maybe BFV could have had a better run but sadly its already received its final update.
Honestly. If BFV ran and controlled like bf4. It would be insanely popular
@@Copperhounddog except for movement and gunplay yeah
@@archives1802 at least battlefield 2042 coming soon though
Battlefield’s physics was always incredible
Battlefield: **closes one eye while aiming**
Cold war: **looks at sky, ground and at a tree**
You're not supposed to close an eye unless you're shooting at longer ranges through a scope, in the military they taught us to shoot with both eyes open so that's actually an inaccuracy that cod got right
@@0326Vet nono i know that having both eyes open with a close range optic is a better way to do it, what I was pointing out is that the cold War player model doesn't even look in the direction they're aiming at all
@@martyboi5609 ah
@@0326Vet I'm not sure how well you can see it in the video but I've seen other videos where the character literally looks like 90° away from where he is actively shooting
🤣
Not to mention that with all the battlefield's wonderful engine and smooth game. The game only 44gb while cod:cw is 180gb. Basically they don't know how to optimize the damn game.
Cold War is 60
@@bigboyevan8686 no, it's like 118.
No it’s 180gb
Bf4 is like 40gb lmao
Bf5 is 100+ and it came out years earlier, dont just lie
Cold war is the most "fuck it they'll buy it game ever"
its been that way for awhile now 😂 thats actually the entire game industry with a few/if any exceptions
I disagree, madden is way ahead of COD. At least COD has a decent story every release. Madden has been hot garbo for way longer.
@@kickintheace true dat
@@A_Stranger2256 eh, BFV was pretty janky at launch, but currently it's a decent gem with some rough sides
@@A_Stranger2256 true, especially the semi-changing of Operation Gunnerside (what the "Nordlys" war story is loosely based on) and several cosmetics (Willhelm Tannstedt).
Otherwise, pretty decent game
Illustrates putting effort into a game vs shitting out a new clone every year
Cold war isn’t a clone they just made that game in 5 months, unlike modern warfare where they did that shit in 3 or more years
@@lamebread1879 it is a clone a terrible one at that shit was so booty
Both games are big pieces of shit tbh.
Lol hardline was so trash i would never buy battlefield again. They haven't made good game since bad company. Nobody plays bf after a month
@@MicroageHD there’s nothing wrong with bfv
I have over 300 hours in BFV and I swear I haven’t noticed 95% of these details 😂
when randomfrankp comments and only gets 2 replys
bruh
when randomfrankp comments and only gets 3 replys
bruh
when comments and randomfrankp only 4 gets replys
ubrh
Probably because it is chaos like 98% of the time, the other 2% is just running to new objective
This is why COD doesn’t focus on them and saves the bandwidth for game movement and gun play. Which is why it’s far superior to battlefields.
This makes me even more excited for Battlefield 2042
Same, I think it'll be the first bf game I'll buy since bf4 on ps3😅
I'm exited too but gonna play smart and not preorder it, especially how the last massive game for preorder is a dumpster fire
Yeah bf5 was beautiful and I liked the game but all their woke shit ruined the game for me also the hit markers where kinda annoying even tho I know they have been in every battlefield I just wish the guns felt more real and powerful.
@@bigshlump928 bf5 was ass, bf 1 was legendary. Still get flashes of PTSD from BF1
@@reggiestockton8166 true bf1 was amazing but I still like seeing planes fly above me and other details so I still play bf5 every so often but only to look around.
Another point where BFV wins: the soundtrack, it is terribly beautiful
Had me in the first half not going to lie
@@alecvalles584 up until terribly
Grammar
Wdym terribly beautiful?
Aye Blackburn what’s up bro Blackburn for life
The real competitor for battlefield is actually modern warfare.
I think the same
Not even.
Agree CW is designed as an arena arcade shooter so technically cold war is designed for a different market of people
We should be comparing the lates games of both franchises, shouldn't we? What difference does it make if it is from the past not the present.
@@augustskarklitis593 we are looking at the evolution and it sucks
Another detail is: You have more fun in BF5 then in CW.
Quite the opposite
@@FAlty75 at least bfv has a lifespan.
@@FAlty75 battlefield 5 is honestly very fun to play even with the flaws.
@@iDayVids What are y'all saying?
Both are terrible games compared to their predecessors however Cold War has probably by now outsold BFV and even though CW won't last , BFV also didnt.
It died 2 years after launch...
CW probably will die this year or the year after.
Either way both are terrible games relative to their predecessors.
@@thishandleisnotavaliable cold war is already dead everyone went back to mw or just plays warzone instead
"Cold War characters also turn head towards explosion."
*Turns the complete opposite way*
I wouldn’t want to turn towards a explosion either
ua-cam.com/video/dNBAgUXFswQ/v-deo.html
Let's be honest the destruction comparison is unfair xD
And let's be honest Cod works at Launch and Battlefield doesn't BECAUSE of the walls
@@TheSYPHERIA No battlefield ever work at launch lol, but it the passing right to play a good game, and not a copie of 10 years ago.
@@angerskarin9222 I mever had problems on bf1 and V's launch so suck it
😆
Yeah CoD wasnt born for this lol
Bf4 almost came out a decade ago had attention to details as much as modern day games. Bf4 was truly ahead of its times
Had also one of the best story modes
@@thocka5144 lol no, it sucks
@@nicolasalbornoz7175 What I remember was cool but I was a kid so maybe u right
@@thocka5144 i actually played couple days ago and Yea.. it was Bad, little too effort on the story and too short, i like the maps design tho, bf3 had better campaign for sure, but still like bf4 tho! Multiplayer gets a 10
If you wanna talk about a Battlefield game that was ahead of it's time, it was definitely BF3. When that came out in 2011.. man there was no other game as detailed and realistic looking as that. Seeing the tracers coming out of weapons and the destructions. That was insane.
*Destruction test*
Me: "Welp I already know who's gonna win this one"
cod mobile
@@Someone-nt8wz what man
@@Aadu0803 did u notice i change my username
@@Someone-nt8wz what you mean by that?
@@Aadu0803 Its destruction test
All I can say is the Frostbite engine was ahead of its time. Bringing you more immersion. Let's see what the next Battlefield can bring to the table. I cant wait...
I agree 100%
So far it's looking good. Just hope DICE iron out the performance issues. A little disappointed by the graphics tho
Battlefield is only impressive for a week or two it's gonna be pay 2 win like every other ea game and it gets neglected after a month.
@@el_Chupo Battlefield? Pay 2 Win? I think you are talking about a different franchise mate
@B R E A D nope u only pay for skins good try
Battlefield will always be superior in terms of attention to detail, but MW2019 was hella impressive for what it did - Cold War is a joke.
MW2019 did 100 steps toward so Cold War do 1000 steps backwards next year
Man MW was amazing for a cod game, cw sucks
Yeah, the animations, reloads, smoke from weapons, and a few other things are actually better than Battlefield.
IW vs Treyarch summarized
cold war is an arcade shooter so not sure why it would try to be super realistic
I've have around 500+ hours in BFV and I've only now noticed that shots can ricochet off the ground. I thought shots only ricochet off of tanks.
I knew the can bounce off tanks, that usually means I’m fucked if they use that to spot me
The real question is can those shots kill someone?
@@narwhalking752 well its projectile based bullets so yeah
@@leopard2a783 I know they’re projectile but have they been tested on killing someone?
These are the little details that make battfield amazing.. even if u not really notice it, it gives U a good "realistc" feeling
Cod:wow I just destroyed a wall😯
Battlefield:oh crap there goes another building 😒
What??
@@wojak7006 ??
Almost every (or every) walls in CoD can't even be destroyed, while in battlefield you can even blow up a building or even tear down a whole skyscrapers.
@@krengreyhart4086 do you recommend me mw 2019 or bf 6?
@@wojak7006 my advice: bf 2042.
I loved Modern Warfare's attention to detail when it came out and the direction cod was taking but for me I lost ALL hype again when I saw Cold War. Just felt like every cod game before again..
Back to BF it is this year again boys!
Modern Warfare all the way! Cold War is just far away behind
Modern Warfare was so terrible. I've played every COD since 4 religiously and the multiplayer was God awful. And Warzone was the worst experience I've ever had playing a BR. But hey, to each their own. Warzone was the last straw for me with COD. They proved where their priorities lay and it's not with pleasing their community. I'm never touching COD again. At least until new devs get hold of it.
Lol what??? Modern warfare still never had as much detail as BF. It wasn’t even that great
Lmao. Imagine not playing a game because the attention to detail isn't there. it's a video game. it's supposed to be fun, not realistic.
@@AdiSidiq MW is actual garbage. The engine is good, but the camping, mounting, camo challenges, side modes, scorestreaks, maps, and basically everything else is trash. Every player on that game hasn't showered in years judging by how sweaty they are, and everyone posts up and mounts at a core area of the map with a literal 0 recoil weapon. Everyone i know hates the game and has no fun in it, including me
I went back to BF5 and BF1 after playing warzone and modern warfare for some time. I was shocked how beautiful these games and how more advanced their graphics are in comparison to the newer COD. Of course the feel and immersiveness is on another level also...
And they run so smooth. Nobody talks about how fluid BF1/V is compared to MW19 and CW. I’m on console and I seem to always get the max available fps in BF games vs COD where it struggles to keep up.
@@RhythmAndPlay yeah COD in general is poorly coded
@@RhythmAndPlay while also having 100x the amount of shit going on lol, bfv was bad but at least I can feel my eyes after playing
@@williewilson2250
It’s not bad you 🐑
@@melcorchancla9431 in terms of how bf is it was but definitely better than any cod
6:24 imagine not having a detail that even gta has
Yeah, I play red dead redemption 2 and it also has that detail. It's one of the biggest small details I've really noticed
Bro it was in the first uncharted game which came out in like 2008
@@MrLemon-vt4ky youre talking about the most detailed game
Battlefield is beautiful
Beautlefield
@@blueglue52 jejeje :)
Hell yeah
i love both games
I love battlefield with online gamplay and mechanics
But I also love call of duty for story line
Battlefield finds the Beauty that no one would really seen in war
Or just don't play on PC lol... hacking and cheaters aren't nearly as big an issue on console. And series X has all the power and benefits of a PC. Especially once BF2042 comes out since it's optimized for next-gen.
@@potato23116 it's unavoidable, they'll find a way
@@potato23116 have you not seen warzone?
@@0326Vet battlefield is pretty good about getting those people off the game. Been playing for over 8 years only ran into 2
@@williamdawson4023 then you're just lucky, BF4 and BF1 is full of them
Modren warfare has some details like BF5 but cold war just messed it up
Bro this cap battlefield way better than modern warfare
@@Ziiusane Cap
Cold War did not messed it up
@@starverdict3246 talking bout modern warfare g, I love Cold War but modern warfare booty cheeks
@@Ziiusane bruh compare it to MW19
Say what you will about BFV, the attention to detail for atmospheric feel is insane.
Do you know why BFV has that much hate?
@@thocka5144 It got a lot of hate at launch due to the way it was presented and advertised. Don't think many people were impressed by the war stories (campaigns), some thought it was lacking a bit of content at launch but after the Pacific Storm update, many players came back and enjoyed it.
@@crowgoesskwaa This is my first BF and installed it 3 days ago. I find lobbies without a problem still even after 2 years so I was surprised that this game was so much hate
@@crowgoesskwaa the only thing I hate about this game is after you die you have to wait and wait and that’s annoying especially you get angry after many deaths and the waiting game is like salt in the wound
I still think bfv sucks :v
i personally think battlefield has always been a little more serious looking and feeling than COD
Yea u right I think battlefield is trying to hard
@@drgreencabral3001 I think that's a good thing, cod is more fast paced and bf won't be able to take that from them easily but they do amazing with aesthetics
They are two completely different game styles.
If I want realistic war shooter, I'll play Arma.
If I want competitive team play, I go to rainbow six.
If I want fast arcade shooter to chill, I play cod.
That's why I actually like cold war more than modern warfare. The graphics and detail are not as good, but there aren't doors and camp spots up the ying yang like MW.
MW was pretty, but catered to a more tactical slow play style that just isn't cod.
This makes me excited to hopefully see some improvements and even more details in battlefield 2042!
Its looking good so far
ua-cam.com/video/OzeXlPxx85I/v-deo.html
This did not age well
@@lmaodead2900 this DEFINITELY didn't age well
@@lmaodead2900 lmao, how wrong I was
Probably the funniest part of this video for me was shooting grenades to detonate them midair. The battlefield side was fine but the call of duty side cracked me up. You can’t detonate grenades by shooting them but you can detonate C4? C4 is really stable. It will not explode if shot. You can even burn it and it won’t explode. It’s the electrical current that makes it go off. It was just funny because they got it exactly wrong for both C4 and grenades lol.
Same with GTA, lol, but there is not even a remote.
@@Frosty_V0 tazing C4 should be fun though
You literally need explosives to explode c4 lol
In real life is almost impossible to denote a grenade on mid air cause grenades explodes really fast.
@@TMoDDD 10 seconds is long enough
I love how a tank came in to demonstrate Destruction completely unplanned.
Bruh like seriously? They literally make crates smh
@@9am395 what the fuck does this mean
@@timmeh0537 an ancient form of language called sarcastic comedy
Holy hell I replied to the wrong comment-
@@timmeh0537 Lmao my bad
1:32 Okay that was fucking cool.
Bum.
@@christianadriandelarosagar7261 ?
@@NA-yv8rv kaboom.
Bum.
You can do it in in bf4 and up.
I find this hilarious that they're comparing a 2017 game to a 2021 game. It's just proves furthermore that battlefield Cares more about its game and doesn't just produce crap for money.
@imagine Jars bf dropped in close to an unplayable state without Americans, horrible maps, horrible severs, and no real campaign. I could care less about how my feet sit on the ground or how the wind blows when I fart… ohh let’s not forget bf 2042 is dripping with 6 maps and a hand full of gamemodes and that’s it there’s ur $60-$70. How tf u even gonna say cod just putts out stuff for money and not look at ur own game dummy. Wake up every video game company out there that costs for their game (other than single player games) is a money grab. Y do u think all the good games are free to play?
@@TheBeast-ts2qp 7 maps and a handful of game modes are enough to keep us entertained until they start releasing more stuff with their seasons.
I can’t speak for cod but I’d definitely rather have 7 maps that feel like an open world sandbox arena than 8 tiny maps at launch.
@@TheBeast-ts2qp tf you mean ‘without Americans?’ The game was perfectly fine without the American division.
@@TheBeast-ts2qp one of the maps is bigger than a pubg map. And then there’s 5 other maps to go along with it and then probably more just a couple months after launch. A couple of game modes is literally all battlefield players have needed for the past 10 years because of the sandbox experience. As for the ‘money grab’, at least the devs look at the small details which you need for immersion and soul (which COD has none of). Imagine being a game developer and having less dignity than EA. That says a lot about Infinity Ward or whoever the fuck is running the COD franchise.
Too bad they shot themselves in the foot at the launch of the game. Telling fans not to buy the game lmao
COD just focuses on pumping out a new game every year to feed the cash cow.
Idk if you knew but there are three teams that work on cod so they get the same time as battlefield to make games and still can't get attention to detail
@@pinheadlarry7335 Wow, I did not know that. That makes it even worse XD.
@@invertMASA yeah honestly, and this was comparing a 2020 game to a 2018 game so I bet bf2042 is just gonna be a different level
@@pinheadlarry7335 Call of duty is much faster paced than battlefield, therefore attention to small detail isn't as big of a priority. To be honest, I personally don't give a shit about any of it other than I'd like to see call of duty have destructible buildings/walls.
@@SteelWorksGuy nah that's the one thing I don't like being compared to bf. If cods maps were destructible then the flow of each map would be even worse than it already is, unless they can pull it off ofc. But after seeing the new games my hope for them being able to isn't high
2:27 You didn't empty the clip. Battlefield V does have separate reload animations for an empty or loaded gun
He probably ran out of things to put in the video.
no no, it shows how in cold war he grabs magazine with bullets and saves it but in bf5 he throws both magazines with bullets and empty magazines on ground.
@@swolzer I have definitely seen ammo saving like cold war in battlefield v. The video is wrong.
@@kickheadsmuoke689 bruh just look at luger reload animation
@@kickheadsmuoke689 like bruh
Why does the destruction feel so satisfying
Cause it’s battlefield, there known for this
First time?
This makes me even more excited for battlefield.
@@catboy3471 why so fucking salty all he said was he was excited for battlefield
@@catboy3471 cry fan boy
@@catboy3471 go cry
@@princeandkissonkoandwong1664 what did he say?
Wait what catboy said?
Wasn't MODERN WARFARE like way better than COLD WAR?
No
Yes
Yeah and its not even close
@@estrofolo806 how
I like cold war's gameplay more
Quality over quantity always wins.
@@Oppen1945 Exactly.
Quality over quantity in a battle for quality... fair comparison. (Dont get me wrong i think cold war is shit, but your comparison aint it chief)
I have both the games each game had its flaws but I personally prefer BFV over CW. The details dont really matter to me that much but what really downgrades CW is the skill based matchmaking. Thats why BF is way more fun to me... Each round you have a new challenge when there are players better than you but that really helps you to get better too
Yea it’s a great feeling when you finaly beat that top player on the server in a fair fight.
2:38 ah yeah the famous BOLD action
I wish there that sniper animation from BF1 when you wanted to use the heavy duty bullets
@@javierm2203 the bold penetrator bullet
Bold of you to assume that it’s not a bold action
@@kingeling i don't get it
@@michelepiperno4310 yes ik it’s not funny
I like at the part 4:20 a guy in chat (at the top left corner) says “U GUYS ARE NOT PLAYING”
😂😂😂
Immersion: one thing Call of Duty will never have and I love about Battlefield
Iq something u don’t have
@@catboy3471 LOLOLOLOL what a comeback
@@catboy3471 the gameplay, fun, and things I can do in BF is 100 times more than any CoD title ever… lol
The new CoD boasts weather and minor destruction LOL… oh my BF has been doing like serious weather and destruction for a DECADE lol
FACTS
And you speak of “relevance”?? WTF lol
Gotta love that CoD boy ignorance and blind bias
Btw I used to be a CiMoD brainwashed game me just like you years ago before I go educated
@@catboy3471 LOLOLOL ahhhh the ignorance again lol
FACT: CoD sells more because like McDonalds it has a larger audience I.e. more children and younger demographics… another analogy… Toyota sells more cars a year than Ferrari, but that certainly doesn’t make the Toyota better than the Ferrari!! Lol
BF has more adults where CoD has more children… look it up genius
I don’t care about sales because I don’t work for EA/Dice so it makes no difference to me… I make no profit lol
I care about quality and gameplay, long term playability, vehicles, dedicated servers, massive destruction, larger player counts, server browsers in game, teamwork, squadding up together with friend, massive explosions, flying helicopters and jets, driving tanks, bringing buildings down for campers who hide in them, having actual gravity in a game so sniping is more skill based, and on and on…
Things CoD cannot provide…
Anyway bottom line is PLEEEEASE stay playing CoD and do not come to BF although I know millions of CoD fans are going to come over and play 2042, get their butt spanked and then back back to the kiddie version to CoD lol
Well buddy they are very different games. Lmao people say the same shit about tarkov and battlefield.
The fact that Battlefield does not have the same frequency of releases as Call Of Duty is explaining a lot of this
the details have nothing to do with the output frequency of a game, the developers could easily put all these details, but it would be a wrong thing to do, because they would make cod much uglier, and above all it would no longer be the cod that we all know, and the details do not make a game more better than another, also because it seems to me that lately cod has been more successful than bf5
@@shinobu6993 ur fried lol
@@oli2173 better to be fried than burned
@Andrei Salvaleon you can’t compare that masterpiece to cod👎🏽cod has never been or will ever be as good as halo
@@shinobu6993 actually it's not easy to put these details and yall trying to compare games that are totally different
Cw basically has little to no attention to detail. Only the basic, and sometimes not even that.
Yeah but it's not like that trash game battlefield lol
@@WilliamHoskins08 I just got back into it earlier today, and it is a very good breath of fresh air from the current directions FPS games are going. Don’t just hate on it, give it a little chance.
@@appleater787 I mean he is not wrong to give hate as battlefield fans always trash on CoD for its lack of attention of detail even though both are have good gameplay
@@frankwoods9772 I’m a fan of both, but I just find battlefield a lot of fun, as it has sandbox features
@@frankwoods9772 the only cod I respect was the mw series, CW ruins warzone and other shit, got janky ass animation, lack of sound design, etc.
Honestly it's a step down from mw19, just pure dissapointment
DICE are professionally good at adding attention to detail.
Fun fact: 1:50 This feature is called inverse kinematics, & usually used in games for walking (the only use I’ve seen so far). Basically, your computer tells a, let’s say foot, to go to a specific coordinate. Then, the computer will rotate & move the leg for the program, instead of you manually animating it in a(n) animation software/game engine.
Correct me if I’m wrong. I don’t know much about IK, I’ve only seen use for it in game development.
One of the most detailed Battlefield game is Battlefield 1
My favorite personally
@@diegobarriga8330 mines bf4
Mine 1,5,4
The saving the magazine detail is kinda new
It was in MW too
Fun fact: The "saving the mag" trend started being famous since COD MW19 came out but The first "saving the mag" feature was from killing floor 2
@Craze Killing Floor 2.
@@craze1773 Rainbow 6 siege had it before MW as well
It’s in battlefield 4 with many guns. Including the deagle
How COD went from MW2019 to this piece of garbage is beyond me.
Same
Rushed production and barely enough time and having to work at home. Infinity Ward usually have it better to these scenarios with having more time, a bigger budget, and they didn’t have corona then. Meanwhile, Treyarch gets there balls strangled for the past couple years with Activison at least they tried 😔
I never played cold war, why is it so bad like everyone says?
@@devilman8101 most people don’t like it because of the SBMM
@@devilman8101 the reason why people don't like cold war is because of skill based matchmaking the lack of content rushed production.
Imagine walking im the trenches then seeing some guy rolling around in the mud and another filming him
Fun fact: The military trains you to keep both eyes open while aiming.
Why is that? Just curious.
@@tjgamin3045 It's a combination of two things mainly: 1. Unless you're sniping, your brain has an easier time lining up shots quickly with both eyes open, something to do with depth perception and the way your brain is designed to process information. 2. Combat awareness, so you can always see everything at all times, since the US doctrine is suppressive fire followed by heavy weapons fire it allows for soldiers to be more aware of their surroundings and snap to a target they might not have seen otherwise, and again it makes it faster to aim at such ranges accurately.
Also look at the target not the damn sky
@@sega6095 LMAO
I still can’t believe I bought Cold War. Such a bad game.
Same
It really isn’t that bad
@@splatooner808 yeah i its not that great but its not a bad game
same. i did not finish the campaign and forgot i purchased it
The zombies are really good and campaign but the multiplayer is pretty lackluster
Also in BF 5 you can reload a specific gun that still has full rounds in the magazine,instead of saying "30" in the magazine it says "31" because of the one round that is still in the chamber of the gun
First battlefield where this was featured in was bf4
@@miku2033 no, bf 3 have that too
Common knowledge
Yes. I love DICE put this detail because some weapon are open bolt.
@@dieiceNGC OH MY GOSH THATS SUCH AN AMAZING IDEA!I hope DICE would put that detail on the upcoming battlefield game
Apart from some issues with the gameplay loop, bfv has aged very well
in my opinion it is the best bf game yet, after BF 4.
Bf 2042 didn’t though
Cold War is such a lazily made game it’s actually incredible. I only play it for the zombies because MW is so much better it’s hard to think that Cold War preceded it.
Cw were made in 5 months lol
@@sayhi2urmam792
Fuck it might be considering the shit going on in activision-blizzard
@@catboy3471 it still was made in a short time with no effort because they only care about money
The phrase 'only in battlefield' comes to mind after watching this
Cold war was a downgrade compared to mw2019.
Don't forget how downgraded Zombies is too
@@javierm2203 I had more fun with warzone zombies then coldwar lol
@@javierm2203 zombies is as good as it always had been, what did they downgrade?
Tell me somethin that i don't know it's massively downgraded compared to mw massively there's no question
Not in the gameplay tho
The way I see it, Cold War is more arcade-esque whereas Battlefield V is simulation-themed, where they can fit more details. Both games have their ups and downs, and I like them both for what they are.
🥱
What the hell is so "simulation-themed" about Battlefield? They pay more attention to detail sure, but they are nowhere near mil-sim.
Yeah. CoD is usually close ranged fast paced maps where BF has slower paced and larger maps/game modes. Like TDM is 100 kills whereas Conquest is 800
@@rifath8152 The large map sizes, weapons and outfits
@@baseddrugdealer5086 Again, what the hell is so "simulation-themed" about those aspects? Warzone had a larger map than any Battlefield map ever, so I guess CoD is more "simulation-themed"? Call of Duty puts just as much effort and detail to its weapons and gunplay (since MW2019 anyway) as Battlefield does. Oh, and BFV outfits? "SImulation-themed'? Please.
But to be far bfV reload animates are from ww2 and in that time there was no tactical reload...
I wanna see the tactical reload for the Gustav cannon
@@burnttoaster7425 xD
Lol
Even in a BFV tactical reload, the bullets are kept in your inventory while the mags are dumped. And in WW2, there were tactical reloads, just wasn't practiced among soldiers who carried clips instead of mags.
I mean, you can do a tactical reload with any gun that has a magazine. I’ve tested every single gun out in the game and there’s a number of different guns with different reload animations based on how many rounds are left in a magazine, tho not all guns have them. The ones I can recall are the Bren gun, 1911 and type 99
We can make conclusion that Battlefield V is more realistic in many ways
@@ohsnap6359 nope, many more
Except in historical accuracy...
@@thishandleisnotavaliable Because it's an alternate take on WWII....
@@kobi7955 What the hell are you saying?
No it isn't , it's historical revisionism , it's set in WW2 , the soldiers use rifles from WW2 and the factions are from WW2 , so are the locations.
Damn man , you're coping so hard...
@@thishandleisnotavaliable Return to Castle Wolfenstein also had all of that and that's an alternate take on WW2
Edit: Inglorious Bastards too
Edit Part II: Also in the universe that BFV takes place in the military had no problem with recruiting women into the army as standard infantry units while IRL they were only really prevalent in the medical field as nurses or scouts/snipers in the red army which makes it an alternate take on WW2 like I said
Battlefield soldiers can stand inside concrete, while COD Cold War soldiers can stand on the water surface...Idk which is better lmao
One is Jesus and the other is a ghost.
@@solaireofastora1664 Holy Ghost and Ghost
You love to see it. I love how somehow battlefield can do this on massive maps yet cod can hardly do this on small maps.
There's no correlation there because CODs engine can handle large maps much better than Frostbite's, the playerbase just hates them becasue it removes all competitive elements from the gameplay.
Warzone, locked 60fps even on last gen console and a map twice the size of Battlefield's largest map, and with over twice the playercount performs well
@@ifb6368 you don't understand what I'm talking about I think
@@ifb6368 I'm talking about good environments and realistic graphics. Something cod really doesn't do so I think the comparison is legitimate
@@ifb6368 also please explain how cods engine handles larger maps better. Because my experience has never been bad on bf compared to cod
Warzone can't even handle a Fov slider on last gen lol. Battlefield V can at it still running smoothly
2:28 In battlefield’s defense, the type 100 does have a tactical reload where you save the mag. But it is also the only gun in the game with that
The repetierpistole (pistol that you reload with stripper clips) also has your soldier catch the leftover bullets
Good job on this video mah dude!
I'm glad you like it
I’ll play devils advocate for a sec: in Cold War, there are special voice lines when you get stuck by a Semtex.
There are over 5 minutes of voice lines for beening burnt as a german in battlefield 5
Soldiers in BF5 also scream when they are near a grenade
@@kgkomrin Yeah I’m aware, again I was just saying.
The water explosion looks beautiful in BF5
Watching buildings crumble in bfv is so nice
1:14 That one teammate that is destroying team's own tank xD
The reason he’s lagging on bfV is because he has 277+ ping
The dislikes for this video were the cold War players who got absolutely T R I G G E R E D
Based on my experience Battlefield is good at graphics and multiplayers, COD is better at campaign and storyline (just IMO)
No one plays battlefield for the campaign that's CODs speciality
It’s almost as if those are the reasons why people play them.
But to spend 60 on campaign for a mediocre game like cod... why? Youre pissing your money away for an unoriginal story and the same copy paste formula thats been prevalent for years now.
@@travissmith5945 I know that COD is just a mediocre game, but im always buy it when the price is getting lower. Tho im curiosity with the story even its unoriginal, especially for my brother that love to play FPS game. My bad if my english's broken
I can agree with that
You have a point with everything but closing one eye for aiming. Both got it correct considering by the time of the Cold War militaries were training their soldiers to shoot with both eyes open because it was found to be more accurate.
In the cold war clip the character looks at everything but the sights
Cold War is a never ending fever dream
Wow I’ve been missing out on Battlefield, this makes CW look cheap. I will be buying Battlefield 2042.
CW looks cheap compared with xbox 360 GTA V
@@andresgarciaml3155 cw looks cheap compared to cod mobile
2042 seems to lack what makes BF special. Maybe that will change on launch
CW looks cheap compared to CW...
Wait
12:01 Did I just hear "Throwing grenada"
"We need a russian character, but can't afford a russian voice actor"
Sebastian Vargas is Colombian, not Russian.
@@RickettsJr My point is it just sounds awkward to switch words for the native equivalent for what seems to just be aesthetic reasons.
LMAO
@@untrust2033 "this character is latin american and we really need to hammer it to the players, have them say something in mexican or what ever language they speak there" - the Devs probably
@@nicolaslabra2225 no need to have it be spanglish and just mix to different languages. Just have them speak full sentences in only that language
10:15 You’re supposed to keep both eyes open no matter what you’re shooting. COD got that right, but maybe people closing their eyes back then was historically accurate which would be a point for Battlefield.
There are teo types of way of aming there booth eyes open and one eye closed
@@RacBack_ First, learn English. Second, learn how to handle guns safely. Third, learn how to shoot.
There’s only one way to shoot and it’s with both eyes open.
Closing one eye gives you better focus and aim with your gun
Especially rifles so get your gun info correct Canadian
@@slakeNsurge until recently its was tought to close your non dominant eye while aiming a gun
Actually no, i had practiced with guns for a while and I can say there's a big difference between one eye and 2, with one you can focus on your target perfectly but at the same time you can't see your surroundings fully, while with both eyes (unless you're ultra trained) you won't be able to focus on your target nor your aim but rather your surroundings cause your eyes cannot focus on various things at a time, only one of them
The magazines on Wake island scare the shit outta me when they explode, cuz usually I'm in them
2:11
That girl was Jesus, standing on water
Bfv is such a older game too and yet runs laps over Cold War it shows that if you put time and effort and thought into a game instead of chasing $ every year it can give you a beautiful game
Such an old game? It’s not even 3 years old yet!
People like you are the reason CoD sucks. There’s a reason why they can keep put out lazy cash grab. Because people like you keep buying it!
Although bf throws an un-empty mag on the ground, reloading an un-empty gun will still give you +1 round. For ex: reloading a 30 round magazine give you 30+1 in the chamber= 31 rounds. Cod does not
Even though BFV was a flop, battlefield never ceases to amaze me with the little details they add in. Whether it be in map design, guns, or gameplay.
Great video, bf5 got too much hate. Love that game wish there was more content . Cold War is B O A R I N G
CoD does have IK for legs depending on ground level 4:43 for example, it just doesn't happen everywhere, like big cliffs
*Fun fact* :- call of duty mobile actually shows 12 round in a revolver while reloading , while in cold war if u equip 12 round in holster there will only be 6 rounds
J358?
@@Aadu0803 yeah
They have differences but we can all agree we dont pay much attention to these details and just play and have fun
Cod: there a camper in the building
BF: 7:54
I dont think that was planned on his part
It just happened
Yeah, fuck da building
I always found Battlefield to be more detailed.
It lose with cod mw 2019
0:47 that bullet detail was on the 2142 as I can remember, I think it was also on the BF 2
Cold War: There a camper in this house
Battlefield 5: What house?
People seem to forget that its a completely different game, although having bullet deflection off surfaces is a very nice touch. Well done Battlefield.
Cold War is such a big step down from Modern Warfare
@Anti Degenerate no I dont think they would its still a shit ass game
@Anti Degenerate why are you spamming links everywhere. And also Cold war has SBMM so no. It wouldn't be good or fun.
Gameplay no it was a return to the BO2 formula
@@chucknorris6640 if you call being a steaming pile of dogshit "a return to the bo2 formula" then yeah I guess you're right
Battlefield better. cod lost its fuel and it's falling from the sky rapidly.
dude cod didnt put some of bfV features because some of it will affect combat, they are more focus on balancing weapons
@@oxfordmule7472 “they are more focus on balancing weapons” when the mg82 just got a recoil nerf that did nothing
@@oxfordmule7472 balance in COD yikes
the only thing keeping CoD from dying is warzone while the rest of CoD games just died within a year because it kept the same multiplayer count since CoD1 and an awesome single player campaign, meanwhile battlefield 3 and 4 which is 10 and 8 years old is still living strong and even more stronger after the battlefield 2024 hype
@@oxfordmule7472 oh yes thet DEFF FOCUS ON GUN BALANCING... My g, they nerfed the aug like 3 times and none of the nefts did shit to the gun, lets not talk about the dmr, mg82, or the ffar
Thanks for this! I now have more appreciation for two games I’ve never played 🙃
Lol same, i dont even know why im here 😂
Battlefield is by far the best fps ever made
Nah
@@metallicfingers nobody asked you
@@JonathanSimmons42 it's yt comments, the world doesn't revolve around you. nobody asked you either
Have you seen Modern Warfare yet?
@@delayedplayer No thanks im already tired of seeing people camping ofc you can get exciting games when people play seriously but i aint getting lucky.
"U are not playing" on the chat. Hilarious.
😂😂😂
Good video! Could you make one comparing Battlefield 1 with another Call of Duty?
Battlefield 1 vs modern warfare ua-cam.com/video/fzXtXhmr_IQ/v-deo.html
You're dead.
@@Stay_Frosty oh nice, thank you
@@Ywthg5w6gwvyw mmmmm, actually I am in Switzerland 🇨🇭
@@para9745 but I thought you died Mussolini.
As what i personally experience, cod games are built for arcade kind of gaming with some aspect of realism while battlefield bring an whole new level of realism and immersion in every released they made.
Unfortunately, these men child still going to be like this after decades.
@@no-bodymr6419 feel u hahaha