@stevenfarley4738 Yes! And "Awesome" Most of the time it feels like that one is used by someone who isn't the least bit interested in whatever it was you just said.
I remember few years bck flying from San Francisco to Portland. That year was the worst gusty wings ever and the pilot try to land 5 times and we could not land. We ended up in Seattle to re fuel and wait for the wind to die out. We ended up renting a car and drove back to Portland.
Nice Video - Camera Video Stabilization sometimes makes it hard to see the turbulence, other than the wing tips.... BUT ALSO Check out the 25:53 mark Plane Spotting #PlaneSpotting
Interesting video. Thanks for recording. I would say mild turbulence at best. Also, Interesting name regarding the 787 but the picture is not a 787 wing...more like a 737- MAX. Enjoy your travels!
Yes, I agree that the plane in the video is one of Delta's A-330's. The author's profile name includes "787" but the profile pic has winglets which the 787 does not. We aviation nuts notice these things!..😅
![[4K] - Full Flight - Delta Airlines - Boeing 757-200 - Atlanta (ATL) - Orlando (MCO)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fBlozbB2eYk/mqdefault.jpg)
![[4K] – Full Flight – Delta Airlines – Boeing 757-200 – Atlanta (ATL) – Orlando (MCO)](/img/tr.png)
Clickbait. Not “super turbulent.”
Is "super" the most overused adjective in the English language today?
or maybe "destroyed" at least on clickbait video titles!!
The word "amazing" should be on the list
@@Beargizmo3and”tons”. We Americans have developed such limited vocabularies.
@stevenfarley4738 Yes! And "Awesome" Most of the time it feels like that one is used by someone who isn't the least bit interested in whatever it was you just said.
What turbulence?
Nice video though I didn't see much turbulents!👌
Seems like the plane was coming in fast, gears down before flaps 2! Nice video 👍
Was a good landing video but wouldn't try to sell "super turbulent" to those that were on Singapore 321.
Nice landing along with some old aircraft as well such as the a300s, 767s, and the 757s one of the USAF.
Thats a normal landing. Nothing turbulent about that.
I'd rather experience the predictable, light buffeting in the clouds than unexpected clear air turbulence which scares the &*^$#@ out of me.
Great Video!
I remember few years bck flying from San Francisco to Portland. That year was the worst gusty wings ever and the pilot try to land 5 times and we could not land. We ended up in Seattle to re fuel and wait for the wind to die out. We ended up renting a car and drove back to Portland.
Nice Video
Breezy
Nice Video - Camera Video Stabilization sometimes makes it hard to see the turbulence, other than the wing tips....
BUT ALSO Check out the 25:53 mark Plane Spotting #PlaneSpotting
No sign of turbulence. Everyone wanting to get on the turbulence bandwagon
Interesting video. Thanks for recording. I would say mild turbulence at best. Also, Interesting name regarding the 787 but the picture is not a 787 wing...more like a 737- MAX. Enjoy your travels!
Looks like an Airbus wing. (Winglet)
Yes, I agree that the plane in the video is one of Delta's A-330's. The author's profile name includes "787" but the profile pic has winglets which the 787 does not. We aviation nuts notice these things!..😅
@@RLTtizMEyeah thats the most clear distinction
34:06 VPOTUS was in town!
At the 25:53 mark
I was there right after Air Force 2 left. Everyone was calling it Air Force One.
I thought I saw the Tic Tac! 😦
If that super turbulent, well you have a good camera stabilizer, congrats...what aircraft are you in?
Didn't see any "super turbulent".
I didn't see any turbulence
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
How about unique?
What was Air Force 2 doing there? B757.
At the 25:53 mark
Probably nothing.
wasting my tax dollars!
@@fred5727 LOL!
@@RLTtizME LOL!
Fly much? Normal decent through clouds. 👎
Don't quit your day job yet...for making UA-cam videos 🤦🏻♂️
I must confess I don't see anything particularly interesting.
Booo
"𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗯𝘂𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘁" lol!