Reviewing the IC-R15 Communications Receiver

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 56

  • @KarlHobson
    @KarlHobson 6 місяців тому +8

    Thanks for a great review, well done Icom on producing this great reciver, fast scan speed, and has a brilliant Rx capability especially on Air Band Civil/Military Marine Ham and much more......I'm getting a lot of fun out of the IC-R15

    • @Scotscan
      @Scotscan 6 місяців тому +3

      Echo the comments - had a lot of hits on the radio out mobile - the scan speed is very impressive!

  • @dont4450
    @dont4450 6 місяців тому +2

    Truthfully, my icom ic r6 still does an amazing job pulling in stations with a signal stick antenna. I'm in New Hampshire, USA and pick up the UK, France, Italy, Mexico, China and more.

    • @markr.1984
      @markr.1984 5 місяців тому +1

      You're picking up ham or broadcast stations? You didn't say.

    • @dont4450
      @dont4450 5 місяців тому +1

      @@markr.1984 hi, broadcast, not ham.

  • @pulsar9716
    @pulsar9716 4 місяці тому +1

    Hopefully getting one before Christmas my bigger interest is what happens between 137-400mhz so it’s perfect, no keypad mite put others off but tbh I’d have it fully programed anyway.

  • @davidalan2469
    @davidalan2469 4 місяці тому +1

    I really like this and am hoping for an upgrade to the IC-R30 with the newer display.

    • @LewisMacKay2899
      @LewisMacKay2899 16 днів тому

      I’ve got an IC-R20 and I’m hoping there’ll be a new maybe IC-R40 if it’s called that similar to this IC-R15 but obviously wide receiver and all modes like the R20 and also full colour display

  • @brianwilliams8620
    @brianwilliams8620 6 місяців тому +4

    I'm sticking with my Icom IC R-30 Analogue and Digital Scanner This would be a step backwards if I purchased one

    • @PeTeR_HaNsSoN67
      @PeTeR_HaNsSoN67 6 місяців тому +1

      I love my R-30 :)

    • @Kowalski301
      @Kowalski301 3 місяці тому +1

      Well, this radio is not a replacement for R30, it's a replacement for the R20. Just look at the model number: R15 and R30, it's pretty obvious isn't it? Also, with inflation, this is basically half the cost of the R30, so expect half the functionality.

  • @markr.1984
    @markr.1984 5 місяців тому +1

    Some handheld ham transceivers scan at a blistering rate. My Kenwood TH-D75 that I've had only a few months is impressive on scan speed. My Yaesu VX-6 is very sluggish. You can ready the frequencies as the scan by!!

  • @markr.1984
    @markr.1984 5 місяців тому

    Didn't know they used 12.5 kHz frequency spacing in the UK for 2 meter ham. We use mostly 20 in the states.

  • @dont4450
    @dont4450 6 місяців тому

    My icom ic r6 picks up everything, shortwave included. It won't receive digital, but most digital frequencies are scrambled anyway. I'm using a signal stick whip on my r6, and I receive stations from Europe, south America, and Asia.

  • @Flightlevel350
    @Flightlevel350 6 місяців тому +5

    €520.- for an analog Scanner ? No SSB, No SW, No 4M ?

    • @patmeaden
      @patmeaden 2 місяці тому +1

      That includes the icon tax

    • @gfdemt917
      @gfdemt917 13 днів тому

      I picked up a gently used r30 for less than that

  • @michaelellard4664
    @michaelellard4664 6 місяців тому

    Excellent

  • @CPlusPlusDev
    @CPlusPlusDev Місяць тому

    Just curious ; if the police catch you using these radios is there a risk of being arrested?

  • @pauln4dmeedwards775
    @pauln4dmeedwards775 6 місяців тому

    What is the PMR BAND?

    • @deepblue69uk
      @deepblue69uk 6 місяців тому

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PMR446 - Private Mobile Radio on the 446Mhz radio band. GMRS is the equivilent in the US that's used at slightly lower frequencies.

    • @ErikN1
      @ErikN1 6 місяців тому

      @@deepblue69ukI would say FRS is a closer equivalent in the US being it’s also license free and severely power limited. I wish we had something like GMRS here in Europe so we could use repeaters and higher power without having to abide by the rules of amature radio.

    • @markr.1984
      @markr.1984 5 місяців тому

      @@deepblue69uk I'd say you're quite wrong about that. If your PMR frequencies really are in the 446 range, as you say, then our FRS/GMRS ones are quite a bit higher. They go from 462 up to 467!!

    • @deepblue69uk
      @deepblue69uk 5 місяців тому

      @@markr.1984 Quite right. I mis-read.

  • @dont4450
    @dont4450 6 місяців тому

    Will this pick up shortwave frequencies?

    • @cnick6
      @cnick6 6 місяців тому +1

      No.

  • @arthurtwoshedsjackson6266
    @arthurtwoshedsjackson6266 6 місяців тому

    Is that a Anytone BT-01 just in shot ? 😂

  • @richardsage3139
    @richardsage3139 6 місяців тому +2

    They couldn't even include d-star

  • @pauln4dmeedwards775
    @pauln4dmeedwards775 6 місяців тому

    Looks like the icom 52

  • @vabbes
    @vabbes 5 місяців тому +2

    So the same as the ID-51, but the ID-51 is cheaper AND has D-Star😂

  • @zerobow9413
    @zerobow9413 4 місяці тому +1

    Does it to SSB DMR pDMR tetra ??? fail

  • @romanhar4151
    @romanhar4151 3 місяці тому +3

    Only 76,0 … 500,0 MHz, only FM, WFM, AM - The old IC-R30 was better.
    Sorry, I have to say that everything Icom makes new is wors than the old deviced (also IC-E92D vs ID-51)
    More limited receiver. I was a huge Icom fan, but changed to Yeasu.

  • @gfdemt917
    @gfdemt917 13 днів тому

    Alinco has more features for way less$$$

  • @pauln4dmeedwards775
    @pauln4dmeedwards775 6 місяців тому

    It's a very hard radio to use for people with disabilities

  • @alan4441
    @alan4441 21 день тому

    Everything on VHF/UHF these days is digital making this overpriced scanner defunct ! What were Icom thinking of with this offering ?

  • @martinryan5069
    @martinryan5069 3 місяці тому +2

    Expensive no short wave ssb are you kidding me rip off get a second icr 30

  • @djmambito2
    @djmambito2 6 місяців тому +3

    Yes another review where nothing is tested in real life ... a real comms-person would want to know it's rf-behaviour in real life .. which means some real rf-measurements instead of only the menu/settings and whistles & bells ... in addition it is way to expensive anyway ... i refuse to pay double the price just because it has a Icom-label on it ... With videos like this you certainly didn't show that it is worth it since you do exactly the same as the rubbish chinese products where no-one ever does real rf-tests.

    • @HubertCoudurier-wf4nj
      @HubertCoudurier-wf4nj 6 місяців тому +3

      Have you tested it in real life ? I doubt it ! Ihave, and it is a great scanner with dual watch, dual recording and I would recommend it for the aviation enthusiast, it is perfect for this purpose, unlike the IC-R30 where half of the manual and possibilities are devoted to .... GPS ! what a waste ! just receive, scan, memorize, ... this is not a radio for the dedicated ham fanatic, but more for the people who enjoy real life in the neighbourhod of an airport...

    • @djmambito2
      @djmambito2 3 місяці тому

      @@HubertCoudurier-wf4nj , no i didn't test it because i dont have one ... so i rely on what others say ... like the one who made this video ... thats why i watch videos like this ... but there is no real testing nor measurements in this video ... so it doesn't tell me anything , so it is useless and nothing else but propaganda for Icom ... which is ok ... but dont call it review.

  • @richardsage3139
    @richardsage3139 6 місяців тому +1

    Lots of stuff to listen to on am fm vhf uhf that's laughable

    • @HubertCoudurier-wf4nj
      @HubertCoudurier-wf4nj 6 місяців тому

      you don't seem to know these ranges of frequencies with thousands of possibilities... it would be better if you knew what you are talking about ...

    • @martinryan5069
      @martinryan5069 3 місяці тому +2

      He does know that's why he is laughing rip off

  • @pauln4dmeedwards775
    @pauln4dmeedwards775 6 місяців тому +1

    No number DTMF pad, icom failed.

    • @ErikN1
      @ErikN1 6 місяців тому +1

      Why would you need a DTMF keypad on a receiver? I agree on the ID-50 and ID-52 though. Maybe the ID-52 successor will have a touch screen with a virtual keypad? Who knows.

    • @HubertCoudurier-wf4nj
      @HubertCoudurier-wf4nj 6 місяців тому +3

      DTMF is the only criteria to test a scanning radio ? what about all the excellent features of the IC-R15 ? dual watch, dual recording, ultra fast search and scan, easy display and programming, it is an excellent choice, probably the best, for any aircraft enthusiast ! I have two IC-R30 and one IC-R15, which is more convenient and simple and dedicated to airband monitoring.. and excellent FM too. attenuator works great with an exterior antenna too.. and just watch the speed of sanning ! 160 channels per second !

  • @pauln4dmeedwards775
    @pauln4dmeedwards775 6 місяців тому

    No touch screen, ICOM failed yet again

    • @Scotscan
      @Scotscan 6 місяців тому +4

      what a load of rubbish comments - that's not what the radio was built for

    • @darrylyoung1121
      @darrylyoung1121 6 місяців тому +1

      this ain't yaesu

    • @ErikN1
      @ErikN1 6 місяців тому +2

      I’d take a good button interface over a touch screen any day on a device like this. If it had a touch screen as an additional option but not required for operation that would be fine too, but nothing beats the tactile feedback of buttons.

    • @darrylyoung1121
      @darrylyoung1121 6 місяців тому +1

      @@ErikN1 +1 . same here.

    • @HubertCoudurier-wf4nj
      @HubertCoudurier-wf4nj 6 місяців тому +2

      this is quite unfair . DTMF is just a very tiny part of radio listening and only a few people are interested in that stuff...