AS Biology - Student's t-test and Spearman's rank (OCR A Chapter 10.6)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024
  • **Just spotted a mistake in my notes!**
    For the "left hand side" of the critical value diagram, when t-value or Spearman's rank coefficient is LOWER than critical value at p=0.05, it should say:
    "Therefore less than 95% confidence that there is significant difference or there is a correlation"
    NOT "more than 95% confidence" which is the same as the one on the right...
    I USED THE WRONG ARROW ON THE LEFT!!
    So: my handwritten one is wrong, but my verbal explanation and the typed out example is CORRECT!
    Sorry! :(
    There are a few possible types of questions in exams on stats:
    Pick a statistical test to prove a certain point (so you'll need to know the purpose of each test)
    Calculate the actual value (use the equation given and be careful)
    Interpret the value in comparison to the critical value given in probability table
    Formulate a good conclusion.
    The calculations aren't that bad if you're careful, so here we'll be focusing on how to interpret and structure a good conclusion to get the marks.
    Please subscribe for more content and comment below to let me know what you think! :)
    Facebook: BioRach - A-level Biology Online
    / biorachproject
    Twitter: @BioRachProject
    Bi...
    Background music:
    I Don't See the Branches, I See the Leaves by Chris Zabriskie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (creativecommon...)
    Source: chriszabriskie....
    Artist: chriszabriskie....

КОМЕНТАРІ • 39

  • @BioRach
    @BioRach  5 років тому +83

    ***Just spotted a mistake in my notes!***
    For the "left hand side" of the critical value diagram, when t-value or Spearman's rank coefficient is LOWER than critical value at p=0.05, it should say:
    "Therefore < 95% confidence that there is significant difference or there is a correlation"
    NOT "> 95% confidence" which is the same as the one on the right...
    I USED THE WRONG ARROW ON THE LEFT!!
    So: my handwritten one is wrong, but my verbal explanation and the typed out example is CORRECT!
    Sorry! :(

    • @sharfanc
      @sharfanc 2 роки тому +6

      Thank you for the clarification, but you needn't dread too much. I am certain that many have intercepted that error and corrected it of their own accord. Not only did we have the capacity to correct the mistake, bit it also proved to be an exercise for intellectual engagement- preventing your audience from erroneously copying down the information without genuine understanding of the content. Again, excellent explanation and clarity of information. Pursue your voyage to spread the dominion of knowledge!💯

    • @ayesha1929
      @ayesha1929 2 роки тому +55

      @@sharfanc bro pulled out every high vocab word from the dictionary 💀💀...we get it...its not that deep...

  • @lycheemango3547
    @lycheemango3547 3 роки тому +13

    Please keep making these videos! They are the most amazing revision resources and really help some of the trickier topics the books tend to overcomplicate! We have plant hormones coming up soon and it's great to see you are still making these videos! Keep up the good work! :)

  • @ishs7869
    @ishs7869 5 років тому +31

    Oh my goodness thank you so much!!, we had the most terrible biology teacher in year 12 that completely missed the biodiversity topic as well as others but you’re videos are really helping me to catch up ready for my exams🙏🙏

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  5 років тому +3

      Glad you find the videos helpful! :D Good luck with your revision and thanks for watching :)

  • @slinkyneko
    @slinkyneko 6 років тому +24

    This was super helpful! I wish my teachers could have explained it as well as you did. Thanks!

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  6 років тому +3

      Slinky Neko thanks for watching, glad you find it helpful! :)

  • @Crackheads305
    @Crackheads305 4 роки тому +6

    You are really great. I just love your explanation ♥️

  • @malanhemal6574
    @malanhemal6574 2 роки тому +3

    Hi Biorach,
    What's the difference between an unpaired and paired t test?

  • @ElectrophilicAddition
    @ElectrophilicAddition 6 місяців тому

    Thank you for making it so clear!

  • @kiransandhu3415
    @kiransandhu3415 2 роки тому +1

    Hi Miss, I'm just going through these videos, and they are so helpful and to the point! Thanks for covering the content in an easy and understandable way! My teacher was right for recommending you!
    As I'm going through, I've noticed there isn't a 10.5 video? I was just wondering if you have a video for this part of the topic?

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  2 роки тому +2

      Glad that you found the videos helpful! :)
      No I haven't made a video for 10.5, since I've prioritised the topics that I think are the trickest for people, but will be making more videos this year to cover the gaps, so watch this space!

  • @michelleokueguale3164
    @michelleokueguale3164 6 років тому +7

    Hi biorach i recently found your videos and I have to say they are really good and clear and straight to the point. Would you be able to make videos on the cardiac cycle Bohr shift transport of oxygen. Could you make a video dedicated to biodiversity in the new ocr a biology please thank you 😊

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  6 років тому

      Hi Michelle, thanks for watching and I'm very glad that you find them helpful! :) Unfortunately I may not be able to dash out more videos anytime soon (in case you're preparing for exams still), but these topics will be on the top of my list of topics to do!

  • @danyah2629
    @danyah2629 3 роки тому +7

    i'm confused... how do you calculate the degrees of freedom for Spearman's rank?

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  3 роки тому +5

      Spearman's rank doesn't use degrees of freedom - you just refer to the data table and look for the p value from 'n', which is the number of pairs of data.

  • @apatchy0664
    @apatchy0664 4 роки тому +3

    Is the critical value always 5%? I have no idea where to start with this - teaching myself in lockdown

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  4 роки тому +8

      Oof, tough one to self-teach this one!
      There are other critical values apart from the one at 5% (you can see them all in the critical value tables). However statisticians have decided that 95% certainty is the benchmark, hence we use the critical value at p = 0.05
      Note that 95% confidence is 5% uncertainty.
      Actually in some exam Qs, you can use the CV at p = 0.01, where you're measuring it at a 99% benchmark. This will make your conclusion even more "precise", but we normally just set it at 95%. But I doubt you'll ever be asked to do so, the one Q I've seen that has the CV at p=0.01 is in its mark scheme, as alternative points that can be made, but not exclusively it.

  • @justin-nx9jz
    @justin-nx9jz Рік тому

    is this the same for chi squared? as my teacher said its flipped but I think he is wrong

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  Рік тому

      Yes it is the same way to interpret chi squared. If the chi value is larger than the CV, then we are more than 95% sure there is significant difference between the observed and expected numbers. If less, then there is no significant difference, which usually implies there is epistasis or autosomal linkage involved (when using chi squared for genetics).

  • @piasytric
    @piasytric Місяць тому

    On the smaller side, did you mean to write

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  28 днів тому +1

      Yes I did! I wrote about this in the description since it wasn't possible for me to instantly remake the entire video... I'm aiming to remake this in the future, but well done for spotting my mistake! :)

  • @adamgrecula4498
    @adamgrecula4498 Рік тому +1

    Hello Biorach,
    Amazing video but i would just like to ask, our biology teacher taught us that we aren't allowed to say that 'we accept the null hypothesis', but rather we should say 'we are unable to reject the null hypothesis'. I also study psychology and choosing statistical tests is also a common exam question and came up in 2/3 papers this year. I was taught for psychology that we say that 'we accept the null hypothesis'.
    I was wondering whether there is a significant difference (excuse the pun 😂) between these ways of saying that the null hypothesis is correct.
    Thank you for saving my biology exams!

    • @harrietjeffery750
      @harrietjeffery750 Рік тому +1

      bit cringe mate x

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  Рік тому +1

      It's absolutely fine to say "accept null hypothesis" in Biology - I haven't seen any past paper mark scheme that says otherwise! One thing to note though is that you should continue to elaborate on that point, so write a statement about the original hypothesis (e.g. we are more/less than 95% sure there is significant difference between A and B).
      Hope this helps! And I always appreciate Biology puns!! 😉

  • @tahirnanji
    @tahirnanji 6 років тому +4

    lifesaver

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  6 років тому +2

      Thanks for watching! Glad you find them helpful :D

  • @kiransandhu3415
    @kiransandhu3415 2 роки тому

    will we ever have to work out the critical value?

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  2 роки тому

      You'll need to find the critical value using the data table given. So it's important to know how to work our the degree of freedom, so you can find the CV in the data table.

  • @chesskez7074
    @chesskez7074 6 років тому +3

    So useful thankyouuuu

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  6 років тому

      Glad it's helpful! Thanks for watching :D

  • @ZestyGecko7
    @ZestyGecko7 Рік тому

    do we need to memorise the equations of Rs and t or is it given?

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  Рік тому

      The equations will be provided. You do not need to memorise them.

  • @malanhemal6574
    @malanhemal6574 2 роки тому

    Hi Biorach, I love your videos, but sometimes the things you say are cut. So, what you say is not fully heard. I thought it might helpful for me and other students who watch your videos.
    Love your videos, thank you !
    Have a Great Day!

  • @kairiannah
    @kairiannah 5 років тому +1

    cheers Rach

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  5 років тому

      no worries XD thanks for watching!

  • @munaaliii
    @munaaliii 4 роки тому +1

    Can we have your email, miss. and Thank you so much you explain so clearly and calmly, very helpful.

    • @BioRach
      @BioRach  4 роки тому +1

      Feel free to contact me via my Facebook page or Twitter if you've got any questions :) glad you found the videos helpful!