p-values: What they are and how to interpret them

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 чер 2024
  • This StatQuest is all about interpreting p-values. You've seen them online or in publications, or heard about them, whispered in dark, rave filled dance clubs, but you've never understood what they were all about. This 'Quest is here to explain everything you wanted to know about how to interpret p-values. Bam!!!
    To learn how the p-values were calculated in this video, see...
    • How to calculate p-values
    ...and...
    • Fisher's Exact Test an...
    For a complete index of all the StatQuest videos, check out:
    statquest.org/video-index/
    If you'd like to support StatQuest, please consider...
    Buying The StatQuest Illustrated Guide to Machine Learning!!!
    PDF - statquest.gumroad.com/l/wvtmc
    Paperback - www.amazon.com/dp/B09ZCKR4H6
    Kindle eBook - www.amazon.com/dp/B09ZG79HXC
    Patreon: / statquest
    ...or...
    UA-cam Membership: / @statquest
    ...a cool StatQuest t-shirt or sweatshirt:
    shop.spreadshirt.com/statques...
    ...buying one or two of my songs (or go large and get a whole album!)
    joshuastarmer.bandcamp.com/
    ...or just donating to StatQuest!
    www.paypal.me/statquest
    Lastly, if you want to keep up with me as I research and create new StatQuests, follow me on twitter:
    / joshuastarmer
    0:00 Awesome song and introduction
    0:17 Conceptual motivation for p-values
    4:32 p-value defined
    7:07 Different thresholds for a statistically significant p-value
    9:16 p-values and hypothesis testing
    9:47 p-values do not measure effect size
    #statquest #pvalue

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @statquest
    @statquest  2 роки тому +31

    Support StatQuest by buying my book The StatQuest Illustrated Guide to Machine Learning or a Study Guide or Merch!!! statquest.org/statquest-store/

    • @dezj9427
      @dezj9427 Рік тому +1

      After watching this video, I bought the book! Thanks!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  Рік тому

      @@dezj9427 Hooray! Thank you for your support!

  • @hamman_samuel
    @hamman_samuel 3 роки тому +555

    In an ideal world, all teachers should be this clear, intuitive, and fun!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 роки тому +20

      Thank you! :)

    • @dengzhonghan5125
      @dengzhonghan5125 3 роки тому +3

      I would say in an unreal word.

    • @seriouscoder1727
      @seriouscoder1727 3 роки тому +1

      It,s null hypotesis

    • @ck-jl6no
      @ck-jl6no 2 роки тому

      in malaysia we dun understand what bam means... lol

    • @chenzhiyao834
      @chenzhiyao834 2 роки тому

      I really like the vedio produced by Statquest. Much clearer explanationation than my lecturer

  • @lindasegerious9248
    @lindasegerious9248 4 роки тому +743

    I'm sorry, but, for some of us, that the ice-cream truck arrives on time is extremely important.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 роки тому +71

      You made me laugh! :)

    • @kanundash
      @kanundash 4 роки тому +27

      @@statquest BAM!!!

    • @jtbauer3789
      @jtbauer3789 4 роки тому +4

      @@statquest Hi Josh, great stuff, though I am still a bit confused. :) So that I can get the fact straight ... Question 1: "The threshold of 0.05 means if A and B are the same, there is only 5% of the tests will exhibit p-values that are less than 0.05". This statement is then equivalent to "If A and B are different, 95% of the tests will exhibit p-values that are great or equal than 0.05". If so, how can you come to a conclusion in the video at 8:48 that A and B are different just because they have ONE p-value which is less than 0.05? Question 2: When you say if some one wants to be very strict, he can set the threshold to be 0.0001. In this case, what will the corresponding p-value be, also 0.0001?

    • @hemersontacon3168
      @hemersontacon3168 4 роки тому +38

      ​@@jtbauer3789 Let me put this in a different way. Suppose that you are the guy trying to develop this new drug A. To be 100% sure that your drug really works and that isn't just luck or placebo that are curing people you would need to test this new drug in every person in the world, or even in the universe. For obvious reasons, this is not possible. To still be able to prove that your drug is curing people you can run this statistical test with a portion of people. We can say that this portion of people is a sample of your universe of people. For this statistical test, you need to establish a hypothesis that nullifies what you are actually trying to prove (this is the tricky part). In this case, this null hypothesis could be that your drug A is no different from drug B that we previously know that doesn't work. The origin of this knowledge about drug B it's not relevant for this test, you can just assume this previous knowledge. You also need to choose a threshold. Now comes the practical part of the test as explained in the video. You create two groups of people from your sample of people and each group is treated with only one of the drugs. You count, for each group, how many people got cured and how many were not cured. With these values, you calculate the p-value. The calculation of p-value needs an apart explanation. You just need to know that the p-value is the probability that the null hypothesis is true. Then if you get a p-value under the chosen threshold, this means a very low probability, it's very unlikely that the values that you observed in this one experiment happened only by luck (placebo or whatever). In conclusion, you can deny the null hypothesis and you can be pretty confident that your drug A does work.

    • @littleKingSolomon
      @littleKingSolomon 3 роки тому +3

      @@jtbauer3789 the equivalent statement should be that: if A and B are different, 95% of the the tests will exhibit p-values that are less than 0.05 since it will be more likely that the test will report significant differences thus producing smaller p-values most of the time. or if A and B are different, 5% of the tests will exhibit p-values that are greater or equal to 0.05(only 5% of the test should suggest that A and B are the same)

  • @jaggyjut
    @jaggyjut 3 роки тому +34

    It’s 12:25 am and finally understood what is p-value. BAM!!!

  • @PritishMishra
    @PritishMishra 3 роки тому +37

    You can't imagine how much *EASY you are making* these confusing things or other people who are making this stuffs confusing !!! Love you man...

  • @firdawsnesrinemahboubi4519
    @firdawsnesrinemahboubi4519 Рік тому +14

    I'm astonished ... you explain the intuition behind this in 11 minutes while my teacher spent 3 hours trying to explain this !
    Glad my sis recommended you ! ^^

    • @statquest
      @statquest  Рік тому

      Glad it was helpful!

    • @Moiez101
      @Moiez101 Рік тому +1

      my professors spent hours and multiple slides trying to explain P-values and still did like 20% as good of a job as statquest.

  • @yashlakdawala7232
    @yashlakdawala7232 3 роки тому +17

    Finally I don't dread this question in an interview. Godspeed to you!

  • @bhagyashreehote479
    @bhagyashreehote479 3 роки тому +6

    Cannot imagine a better and simpler explanation to p-values. Amazing! Loving all the contents of StatQuest. Feels like finding the key to the Real Treasure of stats concepts!! Hurray!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you very much!

  • @emilylee2008
    @emilylee2008 2 роки тому +9

    I was struggling in my stats class lately but your videos SAVED me, thank you so much. I'll definitely be watching more of your videos. I wish my prof was as incredible as you!

  • @phoenixfire9313
    @phoenixfire9313 2 роки тому +57

    You explain things so clearly, these videos are a gift to us all, especially to those like me studying for a statistics exam! Many thanks from Canada

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 роки тому

      Good luck! Let me know how the exam goes.

    • @EbonyPope
      @EbonyPope 5 місяців тому

      @@statquest If the p-value doesn't decide effect size what does it then? And what does determine effect size?

  • @nicw1387
    @nicw1387 3 роки тому +8

    omg I love how calm your voice is, I can actually feel relaxed trying to learn stats - thank you!

  • @fabiof.deaquino4731
    @fabiof.deaquino4731 4 роки тому +65

    The StatQuest must go on! Thanks a lot, Josh. Stay strong and safe!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 роки тому +8

      Yes!!! I hope you stay strong and safe as well. :)

  • @mykhailozadorozhnyi4983
    @mykhailozadorozhnyi4983 3 роки тому +8

    Thank god, you saved me. It was explained so perfect! May my gratitudes reach you wherever you are

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 роки тому

      Thank you very much! :)

  • @ajaybhat1161
    @ajaybhat1161 Рік тому +4

    These videos are concise & easier to grasp than the 2hr Stats lectures at college. Thanks, Josh & Stats Quest Team!!

  • @QuizzQuest08
    @QuizzQuest08 4 роки тому +5

    among all the videos I watched regarding pvalues, I'd say this is the most easy to understand. good job!

  • @SHAMSHERSINGH-iu6pd
    @SHAMSHERSINGH-iu6pd 2 роки тому +21

    I wish I had a teacher like you in my college days. You are out of the world. Really really love your work. Have a doubt in stats don’t worry!! We have Sir Josh Starmer.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 роки тому

      I'm really glad you like my videos! :)

  • @stephenpuryear
    @stephenpuryear 4 роки тому +18

    Josh, this is really good! It covers that main points and helps us all focus on them. As a calibration person, I always find it interesting when I find situations in which we assume the perfection of the accuracy of our input data. This is not at all a criticism of your excellent effort, because if you tried to cover all considerations, you would never publish anything. This is what sank Charles Babbage. I appreciate how you pointed out the assumptions that are sometimes hidden in "hypothesis test". This is why juries find some people "not guilty" instead of "innocent". There is an important sense in which those two things are not equivalent to each other. Thank you again!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 роки тому

      Thanks! :)

    • @SHASHANKKASHYAP08
      @SHASHANKKASHYAP08 11 місяців тому +1

      I really like this sentence, "This is why juries find some people "not guilty" instead of "innocent".

  • @darceysinclair8929
    @darceysinclair8929 Рік тому +7

    this channel saved me from joining the marine corps

  • @iamtrash288
    @iamtrash288 2 роки тому +2

    I'm watching this deep into the night and the consious part of my brain is half-foot in the dreamland, quarter-foot in the limbo and only about the rest in the real world. This kind of explanation managed to get me to get this faster than it lulled me into sleep, so have my like good sir

  • @drashtipatel8938
    @drashtipatel8938 3 роки тому +1

    You are absolutely awesome!! I watched a bunch of videos but yours was the only one where i got to understand the actual concept..Thanxxx a lot! You’re such a saviour.🤩

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 роки тому

      I'm glad the videos are helpful! :)

  • @floriaamalan9029
    @floriaamalan9029 Рік тому +3

    Best thing I've ever watched! Thanks for being so clear and giving examples.

  • @meax4k216
    @meax4k216 3 місяці тому +5

    I would give this video 10/10 p values

  • @mohammadrezaghiasy6618
    @mohammadrezaghiasy6618 2 роки тому +2

    Hey Mr Josh
    I can't Imagine the statistical World without you!
    THANK YOU ❤️

  • @alinyrodrigues97
    @alinyrodrigues97 3 роки тому +10

    Thank youuu! You deserve a Nobel prize for providing such useful content for free. This helped me a lot. Now you have one more subscriber ❤

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 роки тому

      Thank you very much! :)

    • @caclso4909
      @caclso4909 Рік тому +1

      yooo wtf u look like alexandra botez

    • @alinyrodrigues97
      @alinyrodrigues97 Рік тому

      @@caclso4909 oh, I wish! She's gorgeous

  • @sidagarwal43
    @sidagarwal43 4 роки тому +88

    Amazing explanation Josh Sir, I have been watching the stats playlist during this quarantine. Thanks for the amazing content. Stay Safe

  • @diencai1812
    @diencai1812 4 роки тому +11

    You are a legend! Thank you for your clear explanation with some fun along the way.

  • @SebastianCrain
    @SebastianCrain 8 місяців тому +1

    This is the 4th video about p values I've watched and you finally make it make sense, thank you

  • @m.candace4967
    @m.candace4967 4 місяці тому +1

    My brain has been so enlightened, thus I feel so much better about p-values as well :D How many times did I read about this trying to understand it?! But this video concisely elucidated the concept so well, I'll return here if I need a refresh. Thank you Josh and Statquest! Double Bam!!

  • @pavitrasubramaniyan7270
    @pavitrasubramaniyan7270 3 роки тому +11

    thank you so much for making this A1 content to help us students out, we are so indebted and grateful to you.. :"(

  • @davikaacademy4264
    @davikaacademy4264 3 роки тому +6

    This is the reason I have started my channel here to help others understand mathematics like you. This is very good approach in this field ,DAVIKA Academy which is my channel am working on both pure, applied and statistical mathematics. Once more keep it up let us transform the educational sector .

  • @raghavgaur8901
    @raghavgaur8901 4 роки тому +4

    Hi Josh,I really appreciate your efforts in making these videos

  • @Dr.HusseinEid
    @Dr.HusseinEid Рік тому +2

    Omg. Thank you very much i read alot of articles talking about p value but i was confused but now after watching your video i mastered p value😊 i am abdy kany from somalia

    • @statquest
      @statquest  Рік тому +1

      Awesome! And good luck with your studies! :)

  • @sakurasuzuki9575
    @sakurasuzuki9575 7 місяців тому +13

    I finally got the concept of p-value and I’ve heard and read so many explanations, still left confused.
    Thank you so much, you’re making the world a better place❤️

    • @statquest
      @statquest  7 місяців тому +1

      Glad it was helpful!

    • @EbonyPope
      @EbonyPope 5 місяців тому

      If the p-value doesn't decide effect size what does it then? And what does determine effect size?

    • @EbonyPope
      @EbonyPope 5 місяців тому

      If the p-value doesn't decide effect size what does it then? And what does determine effect size?@@statquest

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 місяців тому +1

      @@EbonyPope It depends on what you are measuring. For example, if you are measuring the height between two groups of people, the effect size could be the difference in the average heights.

    • @EbonyPope
      @EbonyPope 5 місяців тому

      @@statquest Ok but what does the p value measure then? The likelihood of the null hypothesis being true? I understand that I reject it when it's equal or less my significance level. But apart from that? How do I interpret a very low or very high p-value? What does it tell me if for example p is 000000.1?

  • @rohanshirude5117
    @rohanshirude5117 2 роки тому +7

    now I understand the P value, don't know its just hyped terminology! Thanks man , the video is great.

  • @beingnothing34
    @beingnothing34 2 роки тому +2

    Amazing explanation! The excitement your explanation generates, blurs the difference between an entertainment video and an education one!! :)

  • @intuitivecontrolsystem4436
    @intuitivecontrolsystem4436 2 роки тому +1

    These series of lectures are a gift to humanity.

  • @mardinmardin7108
    @mardinmardin7108 2 роки тому +3

    So intuitive and well explained!! Great job!

  • @DaisyDorothy
    @DaisyDorothy 4 роки тому +16

    this helped, good explanation!.

  • @rahulkumar-go7mz
    @rahulkumar-go7mz 4 роки тому +2

    You're teaching is very unique and easy to understand. Keep up the good work.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 роки тому +1

      Thank you very much! :)

  • @giraldiego
    @giraldiego 2 роки тому +2

    If my Null Hypothesis is I will understand the concepts explained for you, then I get a p-value of 1 every single time.
    Best teacher ever, period!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 роки тому +2

      BAM!!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  11 місяців тому +1

      @@JohnYoga The p-value is related to the assumption that the null hypothesis is correct. If it is correct, then our data should have a relatively high probability, and thus, we get a relatively high p-value.

  • @pkmath12345
    @pkmath12345 4 роки тому +13

    Sweet. P-value is one of what students are confused about the most in the study of statistics. With normal distribution, p-value is both theoretical and practical. This would elaborate this point as well. Nicely done!

  • @Ron-yi3xu
    @Ron-yi3xu 3 роки тому +6

    Josh Starmer's Stat Quest is excellent.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 роки тому

      Thank you very much! :)

  • @webtechbysuraj5942
    @webtechbysuraj5942 Рік тому +1

    His "hello" is like waking me up from a deep sleep....that's awesome!!💌

  • @manalin6917
    @manalin6917 Місяць тому +1

    Way better than my university tutor explained, thanks you! Big help! Subscribed!

  • @aakashyadav2117
    @aakashyadav2117 4 роки тому +7

    Thanks a lot for this amazing video, I knew what p values meant but you gave me a whole knew way to think about it.
    A lot of statisticians are against using p values. I have tried to understand the reasons, but haven't made much progress. If possible please make a video of it or write it up on a blog.

    • @nmertsch8725
      @nmertsch8725 4 роки тому +3

      The problem with p values is that they are easy to manipulate and you need more information about an experiment than just the p value to assess if the results show anything.
      Let's say I have 100 drugs, test if they cure a diseases and say they are a good drug if the respective test resulted in a p value smaller than 0.01.
      Now even if no drug has any value we expect one p value smaller than 0.01, because we did so many tests.
      This happens a lot and instead a much smaller threshold should be used (e.g. by Bonferroni correction).
      What I read in a medical paper lately was that they tested I two groups of size 3 were different and got "p

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 роки тому +10

      A week from today I'll release a StatQuest on something called "p-hacking" that explains how p-values are abused. Then I'll release a video on power calculations that shows how to fix the problem.

    • @aakashyadav2117
      @aakashyadav2117 4 роки тому

      @@nmertsch8725 So here chances of getting p less than .01 is because we are comparing Large (100) no treatments. If we would be comparing just 2 treatments one control and new one than using p values would be fine??
      Apologies for such a late reply.

  • @borisdjakovic
    @borisdjakovic 4 роки тому +173

    Daddy, what are p-values?
    Sit down son, and let me tell you the story about drugs

  • @robsonsilvadasilva
    @robsonsilvadasilva 4 роки тому +2

    This channel is being really useful for me. Learning a lot. Thanks from Brazil. Take Care!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 роки тому

      Thank you very much! And thank you for supporting StatQuest. :)

  • @aashishmalhotra
    @aashishmalhotra 2 роки тому +2

    Thanks for being such a nice teacher. You made teaching beautiful and fun!

  • @ruxiz2007
    @ruxiz2007 3 роки тому +5

    I love the songs you sing at the beginning of the lectures each time.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you very much! :)

  • @KyurinDiary
    @KyurinDiary 4 роки тому +4

    BAMMMMM i got it now! thank you so much!

  • @bunkertons
    @bunkertons Рік тому +2

    Dude, you're getting me through STATS right now! Thank you! 🥰

  • @Alchemist_171
    @Alchemist_171 4 роки тому +1

    Hurray! I'm on the right quest now. Thank you, sir!

  • @hamade7997
    @hamade7997 3 роки тому +3

    Josh, I am not sure if I am going to pass my exam or not. But if I do, it is thanks to you. You are a king among kings when it comes to clear, meaningful instructions about statistics. Thank you so, so much for the time and effort you put into these videos. It makes studying bearable. Thank you, thank you, thank you.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 роки тому +1

      Good luck with your exam! :)

    • @hamade7997
      @hamade7997 3 роки тому +2

      @@statquest Thank you! I just finished. I'll let you know how it went (:

  • @mostinho7
    @mostinho7 2 роки тому +6

    Thanks for great intuition video. Hope you do more mathematically rigorous videos also ❤️
    9:00 interpretation of large or tiny p value.
    A small p value doesn’t necessarily mean that there’s a big difference between the drugs, but it means that there is a statistically significant difference (even if that difference is small)

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks!

    • @nestorrabanal4451
      @nestorrabanal4451 2 роки тому +1

      @@statquest Thanks for all your videos! I got one question, how is it possible that drug A and B are different if they have 35% and 34% cured people respectively?

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 роки тому +3

      @@nestorrabanal4451 The larger the sample size, the more power we have to detect small differences between groups (or drugs, in this case). For more information about "power", see: ua-cam.com/video/Rsc5znwR5FA/v-deo.html

    • @nestorrabanal4451
      @nestorrabanal4451 2 роки тому +1

      @@statquest Thanks for your answer Josh!

  • @digigoliath
    @digigoliath 3 роки тому +1

    Hooray!!! I made it to the end! And now I get the idea behind p-values.

  • @collingillespie2725
    @collingillespie2725 2 роки тому +1

    I love the jingles. They are short and delightfully lacking in enthusiasm. Thanks for the great videos!

  • @Sidbaazi1863
    @Sidbaazi1863 4 роки тому +22

    Though I am not a biology guy, but by watching your videos, I guess I can learn statistics and biology at same time.
    Thanks a lot Josh.

  • @jaskiratl.4434
    @jaskiratl.4434 2 роки тому +4

    It's been over a year and there are still comments being hearted and getting replies lol, I love the commitment.

  • @Leon_Binswanger
    @Leon_Binswanger 23 дні тому +1

    Amazing Video, solved a lot of confusion for me! Thank you very much.

  • @paulafromlodz
    @paulafromlodz Місяць тому +1

    Amazing explanation and great voice! It is a pleasure to listen to You and all examples are funny. Live the pictures and examples. Thank you!

  • @ashutoshkumarjha41
    @ashutoshkumarjha41 2 роки тому +4

    Thanks, for such creative interpretation of p value. Sometimes it appears to me that i have to cram a lot of formula in stats and that is quite irking for me.But your video is simple, adorable and short in which you have used set induction and then illustrated through various distinct examples. Lovely!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 роки тому

      Glad it was helpful!

    • @chetankumar9463
      @chetankumar9463 2 роки тому

      Bhai mujhe bhi samjha do. Mere kuch palle nhi pada

  • @fengshandian
    @fengshandian 4 роки тому +4

    Thank you so much! I'm a bit confused about why the closer a p-value is to 0, the more confidence we have that Drug A and B are different as if the threshold is 0.05 which means if A and B are same and if we did this exact same experiment a bunch of times, then only 5% of those experiments would result in the wrong decision. Then if the p-value is 0.03. It means only 3% of those experiments would result in the wrong decision. Why it doesn't mean it is more likely that A and B are same?

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 роки тому +6

      The p-value tells us how different the observed data are from what we would expect if the data were the result of random chance. The smaller the p-value, the less likely that the data were the result of random chance.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 роки тому

      @OKUBO SELESTINE OPIYO It's not exactly "the the p-value, meaning there was less random chance influencing the results", it is more that "if it were random chance, then the event we saw would be very rare".

  • @priyadharshinig4527
    @priyadharshinig4527 4 роки тому +2

    The explanation was very easy! It really helped me a lot. Thanks a lott!

  • @reyhandwiprasetyo1449
    @reyhandwiprasetyo1449 10 місяців тому +2

    The best explaining video i ever watched.

  • @pradeepkumar-ew1ze
    @pradeepkumar-ew1ze 3 роки тому +3

    I reject the null hypothesis that "there is a statquest video that don't start with a awesome song" :)

  • @physics19941994
    @physics19941994 3 роки тому +5

    Sir, I will do a case study on your teaching methodology

  • @brindhaganesan3580
    @brindhaganesan3580 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much Sir for this crystal clear explanation. Fun and interesting watch. Huge respect.

  • @staynomadic5828
    @staynomadic5828 4 місяці тому +1

    Loved it... was struggling to understand how the p value actually determine the differences in effect. This video explained it all. Thanks a lot StatQuest

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 місяці тому

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @EkaluxUaareemitr
    @EkaluxUaareemitr 3 роки тому +6

    Is it just me who laughs every time he says "small p"-value?

  • @rocky90091
    @rocky90091 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing explanation! Please keep them coming 🙏

  • @guillermorosales3978
    @guillermorosales3978 Рік тому +1

    Excellent explanation, simple, summarized and clear

  • @Lehmann108
    @Lehmann108 4 місяці тому +1

    One of the best explanations of p values!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 місяці тому

      Glad you think so!

  • @duygiangnguyen7942
    @duygiangnguyen7942 3 роки тому +1

    A really great explanation. Thanks so much!

  • @LucasSantos-yb2qo
    @LucasSantos-yb2qo 3 роки тому +1

    You made me sign on the first "hooray and bummer", but at the end of the video I realized u made a good material and worth the following, nice job XD

  • @mehmetkazanc5855
    @mehmetkazanc5855 10 місяців тому +1

    I graduated with your videos. I can say that the best and most clear explanation about my interested topics :)

    • @statquest
      @statquest  10 місяців тому

      BAM! Thank you!

  • @Veigaburame
    @Veigaburame 3 роки тому +2

    I spent like 2 days read about NULL HYPOTHESIS and when I came here you just said that to prove whether the drugs are the same or not.... Sir you are intelligent indeed!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you! :) I also have another video that is all about the null hypothesis: ua-cam.com/video/0oc49DyA3hU/v-deo.html

  • @nick_g
    @nick_g 3 роки тому +1

    These videos are excellent. Thank you!

  • @mehak8392
    @mehak8392 2 місяці тому +1

    I AM SO GRATEFUL I FOUND THIS!!!

  • @trishamaefrancisco6032
    @trishamaefrancisco6032 Рік тому +1

    Your "Horrayyy!" Makes me smile while learning from your videos.😆

  • @msaparajita849
    @msaparajita849 Рік тому +1

    The last point about p values and the difference between the two samples is seriously 🤯 BAM! 👍🏽👍🏽

  • @rafaelv.valadares2721
    @rafaelv.valadares2721 Рік тому +1

    Bam!!! Thanks! This video is going to help me in a presentation at work!

  • @chuongnguyen6091
    @chuongnguyen6091 2 роки тому +1

    thank you for the good work! you made things simple and fun!

  • @narangfamily7668
    @narangfamily7668 7 місяців тому +1

    tysm! you are truly a gifted teacher

  • @univbae
    @univbae 27 днів тому +1

    Wow I heard exactly what I needed to know! Thank you man !! Horraaaay

  • @maksimgrinkov5857
    @maksimgrinkov5857 2 роки тому +1

    Man, you're awesome. I wish there were more content like this

  • @rishabhsingh8416
    @rishabhsingh8416 2 роки тому +1

    thank you very much Josh, I was very confused with this topic

  • @Aya_riiia
    @Aya_riiia 2 роки тому +2

    This is like dora the explorer for students like me 😭😭❤️ You saved me a lot of times bro!

  • @zhanbolatmagzumov6409
    @zhanbolatmagzumov6409 2 роки тому +1

    it is the best explanation I`ve ever seen. Thanks a lot!

  • @shekharsachdev7710
    @shekharsachdev7710 4 роки тому +2

    Thank yu so much sir for such clear explanations. You rock. Hurraaayy 🎉

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 роки тому +1

      Thank you very much! :)

  • @hopefulnyigma
    @hopefulnyigma 2 роки тому +1

    Awesome explanation. Thanks

  • @neelshah8908
    @neelshah8908 Рік тому +1

    This is really fun way to learn! BIG THANKS

  • @alecvan7143
    @alecvan7143 4 роки тому +2

    Love those new slide transitions

  • @giuliobrunetti8402
    @giuliobrunetti8402 3 роки тому +1

    That's actually a great video! Well done!!

  • @aaronrodriguez5454
    @aaronrodriguez5454 23 дні тому +1

    I really needed the, "if johnny has 3 apples" level of explanation

  • @arvindgond4149
    @arvindgond4149 3 роки тому +2

    Very clear cut and nice way u explained it 😍😍
    Thank you sir 🙏🙏

  • @eglo12
    @eglo12 3 роки тому +1

    Mate..., it’s just amazing! Thanks

  • @jackignatev
    @jackignatev 4 роки тому +2

    I fancy this acid intro design!

  • @alyahyai
    @alyahyai 4 роки тому +2

    that was good, thanks .. & double BAM!

  • @fairyhanfloss
    @fairyhanfloss 2 роки тому +1

    i love StatQuest thank you Josh

  • @lorenajuca5544
    @lorenajuca5544 3 роки тому +1

    What an amazing explanation!