What should you consider before stepping up to a 2 Line EN C wings - Theo De Blic

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @Itsallgoodtogo
    @Itsallgoodtogo Рік тому +1

    This is gonna be a good one

  • @michlblacksmith
    @michlblacksmith 9 місяців тому

    I also did not get all the maneuvers for a 2-liner? And what about the distinction between a Mid C-2 Liner e.g. Airdesign Volt 4, Zoom XC2, Gin Camino 2 compared to a High C-2 liner e.g. Ozone Photon, Phi Scala Light 2 Niviuk Artik R,,...

  • @Unternehmersprechstunde
    @Unternehmersprechstunde 10 місяців тому

    @FlyingKarlis Sorry that I didn't understand: which manover exactly is necessary in case of flying a 2-liner? Fullstall? And if yes, why?

    • @AdrianCiuplea
      @AdrianCiuplea 7 місяців тому

      Stall & spin. To be able to clear cravattes

    • @Unternehmersprechstunde
      @Unternehmersprechstunde 7 місяців тому

      @@AdrianCiuplea Ok, thanks. Great Videos by the way 😀

  • @ripmanridin7092
    @ripmanridin7092 Рік тому

    Good info...........thanks!

  • @jerbearflying9305
    @jerbearflying9305 Рік тому

    Amazing contents 👌

  • @markmcgoveran6811
    @markmcgoveran6811 Рік тому

    It would seem to me mathematically that a two liner would be far less prone to distortion from line changes and stretching.

    • @FlyingKarlis
      @FlyingKarlis  Рік тому

      How do you mean?

    • @markmcgoveran6811
      @markmcgoveran6811 Рік тому

      @@FlyingKarlis let's consider this miracle in two parts the cloth and the lines. If you have most of the curve being selected by the cloth and very few points of connection like only to then if one of them stretches a little bit the whole curve changes a little and that is less of an aerodynamic disaster then something with more lines and one in the middle that is overstretched with a bulge and then pulled back into conformity. If you looked at this from the side just a cross-section of the single place where those lines connect, if the front line is a little bit loose on one side the curve is essentially the same. If the line is a little bit loose on a backside or maybe even stretched on both sides the curve of the wing remains the same because it's enforced by the rigidity generated by the air pressure coming in the mouth. You would have basically the same Wing aerodynamic lie with a weird twist to it and you could steer all of that out with a use of the brakes. I have no calculations related to how it would collapse with this twist already. I considered a crash a guy had who consistently flue on a paramotor 100 pounds overweight and when they did the crash analysis he had one line that was stretched 12 mm. In my own personal mathematical analysis if you have only two points you keep the same shape and you don't have a distortion of the wing shape if you have three points and you have some stretch you can get a distortion that changes the profile. Does that make sense?

  • @raoulduke1914
    @raoulduke1914 10 місяців тому

    The next question is: are 3 liner C gliders dead? what manufacturer will dare to put resources into developing new 3 liner in C category? So soon pilots will be forced to go from high B to a 2 liner it looks like.

  • @chamberofparawaiters6090
    @chamberofparawaiters6090 Рік тому +1

    Hi, it's weird. The Skywalk Mint is built with stabilo. Anyway, your contents are great...

    • @theoflies
      @theoflies Рік тому +3

      Some C 2 liner do have stabi line which is a great news ! I was mainly with the Photon in mind and After checking recently many brands did make the effort of putting a stabilo line on their C 2 liner :)

    • @alximiaxtreme
      @alximiaxtreme Рік тому +1

      Bonanza 3 also has stabilo lines

  • @Florian24
    @Florian24 Рік тому

    i went from 3 liner C to 2 liner C

    • @FlyingKarlis
      @FlyingKarlis  Рік тому

      How is it for you?

    • @Florian24
      @Florian24 Рік тому +1

      i feel good under the 2 liner, no big difference, went from queen 2 under the B3@@FlyingKarlis