Flaris LAR01 High Performance Light Jet

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
  • Private jets ​www.aeroavion....
    Support Mojogrip on Patreon / mojogrip
    Flares LAR01 is a high performance 5-seater light jet manufactured by Metal-Master in Poland. The latest prototype of the jet appeared at an exhibition in Poland and our good friend @sxmstevo was able to ask a few questions on video.
    The Flaris light jet is built to fly and travel fast, while making best of it’s useful payload. The jet has only one engine and can be operated by a single pilot. So think of this more like an owner operated family aircraft. Here are some of the performance data.
    Capacity: Seats up to 5 people
    Speed: up to 437 miles per hour
    Stall speed: 72 miles per hour
    Range: up 1955 miles on a full tank
    Climb rate: 5900 feet per minute
    Price: $1.8 million
    If this light jet is successful to market, it would be in direct competition with Cirrus SF50 light jet. They both cost around the same price and practically serve the same missions, except the Flaris Jet claims to be faster and more useful on a grass field or shorter runway.
    Shout out to @sxmstevo on Instagram for submitting this video.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 612

  • @mojogrip
    @mojogrip  5 років тому +21

    On April 5 2019, Flaris LAR01 made it's maiden flight ua-cam.com/video/7BKXQWgWavk/v-deo.html

    • @stanleymasterson1135
      @stanleymasterson1135 3 роки тому

      Any company foolish enough to use rear hinged doors will never sell me a plane

    • @donaldjohnson257
      @donaldjohnson257 3 роки тому

      @@stanleymasterson1135.......Forgive me, but why??

    • @stanleymasterson1135
      @stanleymasterson1135 3 роки тому

      @@donaldjohnson257 You know what they say... "If you have to ask..."

    • @donaldjohnson257
      @donaldjohnson257 3 роки тому

      @@stanleymasterson1135....Have to ask what?

    • @stanleymasterson1135
      @stanleymasterson1135 3 роки тому

      @@donaldjohnson257 Yikes, he has memory loss as well

  • @fobypawz418
    @fobypawz418 3 роки тому +13

    could this be the most economical multi-passenger jet ever made? I sure hope so! it's gorgeous!

  • @danielmilewski7659
    @danielmilewski7659 4 роки тому +9

    Polish engineering. I am proud!

  • @mass4552
    @mass4552 5 років тому +21

    Always fascinated to see what can be stuffed into a small airframe and still retain performance. Thanks for the work you do bringing these videos to us.

  • @kleinbottled79
    @kleinbottled79 3 роки тому +1

    1:10 "It can be adjusted for the high person."
    Perfect.

  • @jonathanallen9596
    @jonathanallen9596 5 років тому +8

    Impressive range, cruising speed and stall speed for a single engine jet

  • @stevebond727200
    @stevebond727200 4 роки тому +21

    You gotta love the question: "Are the seats adjustable?"

  • @stevo2988
    @stevo2988 5 років тому +6

    It's a great project!! one will get far and fast with less fuel consumption and much lower operating cost compared to other aircrafts with similar range and speed. Thanks for sharing!!

  • @junuvojam8453
    @junuvojam8453 5 років тому +60

    For all those people bitching about the space/price and comparing it to the Cirrus Vision jet; this plane (so far) is 200K cheaper (flyaway), needs less than half the runway, does not need pavement, flies 50% faster, goes further, doesn't need to be stored in hanger and has cheaper operating costs.
    Spoiler alert: the Vision jet is only 100Kph faster than their prop plane. Its also around ~3x the price, IMO if they can certify this to FL450 IFR and meet their costings then this is a much better option than the Vision Jet, and the logical steep up from an SR22.

    • @codmott286
      @codmott286 5 років тому +11

      Anyone in the market for a 1.8m aircraft isnt going to care about another 200k. Both these planes will still be landing on the same runways, it's not like this thing is gonna be doing back country flying on to private grass strips. And who cares about FL450? While you're spending the next half hour getting there the Cirrus will already gain 200 miles on you cruising at FL250 which is plenty.
      I still think the best pressurized cruiser for under 2m is the Lancair Evolution.

    • @marchills4131
      @marchills4131 5 років тому +6

      Cite please for actual performance figures to back up those claims.

    • @scottiemelancon5969
      @scottiemelancon5969 5 років тому +7

      This plane hasn’t done any of which you speak.

    • @gmcjetpilot
      @gmcjetpilot 5 років тому +3

      Your comments about flying at flight level 450 (ridiculous not even a B767 is certified above FL430) and getting the cost down, well that ain't going to happen.. who the f flies a jet off soft fields (which implies short as well). There's nothing special about this plane that makes it unique or more suited for soft fields. I guarantee you this plane will never go into production, guarantee it.

    • @junuvojam8453
      @junuvojam8453 5 років тому +5

      @@gmcjetpilot GMC people that don't want to drive their asses all the way to the airport. Or don't mind but don't want to live next to an airport. Heaps of prop planes taking of soft or improvised strips.

  • @OneGenericName
    @OneGenericName 5 років тому +2

    Beautiful aircraft got goosebumps with the engine start and taxi

  • @AviationNut
    @AviationNut 5 років тому +24

    In 50 years we're probably gone see a whole bunch of these single engine jets.

    • @adrianbishop6102
      @adrianbishop6102 5 років тому +3

      Aviation Nut yeah, dropping my kids off at school and soccer practice....

    • @garymyers6638
      @garymyers6638 5 років тому +3

      Aviation Nut Sikorsky was famously quoted as saying the aircraft was only half invented in that you needed a runway and specialized storage facilities. Vertical lift off aircraft with smaller foot prints will be the most normal mode of civilian aircraft in fifty years.

  • @aleksandrnestrato
    @aleksandrnestrato Рік тому

    I love that central stick with two throttles!

  • @edmonddantes1617
    @edmonddantes1617 5 років тому +1

    super cute plane. very nice. plus love the fact it has parachute

    • @Trex531
      @Trex531 4 роки тому

      Cirrus Vision Jet also has parachute and the G2 version got full automatic emergency landing system, in case pilot passes out.

  • @lejink
    @lejink 5 років тому +5

    Removable wings is an interesting feature on a jet
    Could save a few bucks on hanger space

    • @majorchungus
      @majorchungus 2 роки тому

      If you can afford a jet, you shouldn't be worried about hanger rent.

  • @harrymakongwa1147
    @harrymakongwa1147 5 років тому +15

    How to use the parachute in case of emergency.
    1.Pull the cable forward(to open the parachute cover),then pull again downward(to deploy the parachute.
    2.Switch the landing gears(tyres to be open and ready)
    3.Shut down the engine or reduce the cruising speed to less than 80 knots.
    4.Prepare yourself and those you are with psychogically for the worse if parachute fails .
    5.Get ready for the impacts when the plane touch the ground or fall ..
    6.If you survive come to the comment section as give your testimony ..
    7 .You can detatch the wings and use it on the road ..

    • @iki96
      @iki96 5 років тому +3

      How to PROPERLY use the parachute in case of an emergency:
      Step 1: Pull the cable parachute to open the parachute cover.
      Step 2: Parachute cover gets sucked into the engine.
      Step 3: Engine failure and potential fire breaks out.
      Step 4: Get engulfed in flames because your fuel is in the fuselage.
      Step 5: Enjoy the BBQ!

  • @elektro3000
    @elektro3000 5 років тому +6

    I love it, I'd be interested in buying one...

  • @shimy333
    @shimy333 5 років тому +6

    Many negative comments.... I think it looks great

  • @NN-uu9qo
    @NN-uu9qo 5 років тому

    Really love the door and center stick.

  • @chilarai1
    @chilarai1 5 років тому +2

    I wuz born too early. Its going to be an exciting next few decades for personal air transport.

  • @mojogrip
    @mojogrip  5 років тому +53

    According to the manufacturer, the doors have a locking system combined with pressurization which makes it impossible to open in flight.

    • @codmott286
      @codmott286 5 років тому +11

      I dont think the concern isn't accidental opening but rather explosive decompression.

    • @tropicthndr
      @tropicthndr 5 років тому +19

      The doors are the speed brakes on landing, you pop both open on touchdown and you get so much drag you don’t have to use wheel brakes.

    • @badr_marfou
      @badr_marfou 5 років тому +4

      tropicthndr are you sure of that 😅 doesn't sound safe at all

    • @patfisher9259
      @patfisher9259 5 років тому

      MojoGrip x. Dvs, ?S c l

    • @wyunaboy
      @wyunaboy 5 років тому +3

      Nothing is impossible, when major factory like boeing and airbus can get it wrong..if this door fail, it will fail spectacularly..scary thought.

  • @momonamafg1917
    @momonamafg1917 5 років тому

    Wow so many ppl bitching about the doors speed why don't you guys just wait and see,,,,don't be haters ,,,,,we should all be happy for a new builder who is trying to lower the price of jet ownership !!

  • @willusa2927
    @willusa2927 4 роки тому +12

    That's my type of airplane has parachute right on the plane

  • @sleelakrishnan
    @sleelakrishnan 4 роки тому +1

    This jetpack was so much beautiful 😍😍😘

  • @ShawnC.T.
    @ShawnC.T. 5 років тому +1

    I like this small jet, if I had the scratch, I'd definitely consider purchasing one...

  • @BriShep123
    @BriShep123 3 роки тому

    I love this plane. Same engine as the SF50 but longer range.

  • @ananda_miaoyin
    @ananda_miaoyin 5 років тому +9

    I would like to see some actual performance but it looks like we are approaching the Jetsons´ Age! Nice video.

    • @jeanjenner4510
      @jeanjenner4510 5 років тому +2

      Maximum Ramp Weight: 6,040 lbs.
      Maximum Takeoff Weight: 6,000 lbs.
      Full Fuel Payload: 498 lbs.
      Useful Load: 2,499 lbs.
      Fuel Capacity: 2,000 lbs. usable/295 gal.
      Wingspan: 38.7 ft.
      Length: 30.7 ft.
      Height: 10.9 ft.
      Cabin Length: 11.5 ft.
      Cabin Width: 5.1 ft.
      Cabin Height: 4.1 ft.
      Pressure Differential: 6.1 psi
      Maximum Cruise Speed: 308 kts
      Cruise Speed: 300 kts
      Maximum Operating Altitude: 28,000 ft.
      Maximum Climb Rate: 2,500 fpm
      Maximum Economy Range: 1,200 nm
      Stall, Landing Configuration: 67 kts.
      Takeoff Distance: 2,036 ft./3,192 ft. (50-ft. Obstacle)
      Landing Distance: 1,628 ft./3,011 ft. (50-ft. Obstacle)

    • @bliglum
      @bliglum 4 роки тому

      Sure, if the Jetsons were super rich elite 0.01%'ers to be able to afford a $2,000,000 car! LOL

    • @michaelamick8295
      @michaelamick8295 4 роки тому

      @@bliglum he must have been thinking of Jetson's boss, Mr. Spacely.

  • @purebloodheretic4682
    @purebloodheretic4682 5 років тому +1

    The Coloumbians are gunna love this one!😉

    • @ShawnC.T.
      @ShawnC.T. 5 років тому

      duncan wood Lol, smh...

  • @williamchambers5419
    @williamchambers5419 5 років тому

    All show, no go! I want to see more than just rolling down the taxiway!

  • @jeanjenner4510
    @jeanjenner4510 5 років тому

    50-knot stall speed with flaps... amazing

    • @maciejpeikert8966
      @maciejpeikert8966 5 років тому +2

      My mistake in this video. Should be around 70, depending on the weight.

    • @jeanjenner4510
      @jeanjenner4510 5 років тому

      @@maciejpeikert8966 Thanks for the correction - Cirrus list the 2017 Vision Jet (SF50) stall speed in Landing Configuration at 67 kts. That is still pretty good.

  • @ilkeracar6567
    @ilkeracar6567 3 роки тому

    Perfect family jet

  • @cryptomaniacs5533
    @cryptomaniacs5533 5 років тому +4

    It's nice to have more options in the single engine light jet category, but for the price, I'd much rather have the Cirrus.

    • @wojciechmuras553
      @wojciechmuras553 2 роки тому

      Would you? Flaris seems to be noticably faster, have a vastly improved range, and need a quarter of the runway a Cirrus needs.
      Admittedly, VisionJet has the undoubtable benefit of already existing...

  • @angelotig
    @angelotig 5 років тому +1

    Let’s see this jet in the air

  • @sjvche7675
    @sjvche7675 5 років тому

    Gives new meaning to suicide doors - great speed brakes.

  • @orgonsolo6291
    @orgonsolo6291 5 років тому

    I really liked the design and the cool features. It did have some quirks there yeah, and people talk about the doors.. I hope the engine is up to par. Thumbs up for the effort from me and wish you luck!

  • @zendean5207
    @zendean5207 4 роки тому

    Let's see it fly.

  • @janettemolina7948
    @janettemolina7948 5 років тому

    Nice plane, it looks very safe and its benefits are fantastic, it is a practical plane and based on praticidade and undoubted experience of its manufacturers, a concept of plane that marks the future of aviation, a concept of air taxi very interesting.

  • @wuffos
    @wuffos 5 років тому +1

    It taxies really great.☺

  • @puiphillips4609
    @puiphillips4609 4 роки тому

    The sexy rounded windows give the impression of offering quite restricted visibility but that may just be a false impression from the views of the plane that are shown.

  • @terriecotham1567
    @terriecotham1567 5 років тому

    You have to love all the new aircraft & avionics coming out like this jet was that 820 feet take off with 1900 + miles range along with 5900 Clime rate not bad for the rich as they say its small so no super long runway and will work from a grass strip along with a BAS type chute not bad .
    You have to wonder what types of aircraft will be flying 100 to 150 years from now new ways of building them along with all glass cockpits displays that give the pilot more data than the fighter pilots in the SR 71 had.
    Thanks for posting

  • @paultaylor9939
    @paultaylor9939 5 років тому +26

    Soon as he said the price I would go for a twin Cessna

    • @MrLeewsee
      @MrLeewsee 5 років тому +2

      yeah, how about a used citation for a fraction of the price. the annual operating costs would be much higher though!

  • @MikeKobb
    @MikeKobb 5 років тому +1

    Throttle position in that prototype looks awkward. Will be interesting to see how it evolves. I like the idea of being able to fly with the stick in my right hand, though.

  • @franzfms86
    @franzfms86 5 років тому +2

    This is totally awesome.

  • @prex345
    @prex345 5 років тому

    Looks very tight on interior space.

  • @shauncampbell969
    @shauncampbell969 4 роки тому +1

    I thought there would be Flight footage, not just a tiny clip. Interesting none the less
    Shaun of NYC

  • @KingOfBanks
    @KingOfBanks 5 років тому +1

    Looks interesting, good luck with the project!

  • @solstar4778
    @solstar4778 5 років тому +2

    Gull wing doors would be more appropriate for this jet-something to consider in the future🤠

  • @8literbeater
    @8literbeater 4 роки тому

    I see some people are comparing this to the Cirrus Vision. If you had ever seen a Cirrus you would know that they aren't similar. There is no comparison.

    • @8literbeater
      @8literbeater 4 роки тому

      For example, the Cirrus weighs twice as much as this thing.

  • @americangooeyduck5743
    @americangooeyduck5743 5 років тому +6

    Really cool seeing more and more of these single pilot jet aircraft coming out and of course that will mean pricing will start going down with jet operated aircraft because for most of your weekend warriors private pilots this is out of range LOL on top of that I’ve looked into it it’s definitely not easy to get your endorsement for jet especially for again a weekend warrior little bit different somebody getting into commercial flying now that’s a career but on top of the price tag the operating cost per hour I think that would be enough to turn me off I’m curious what operating cost is estimated to be an hour? Anyways what a beautiful plane though really surprised at it currently being set for 25,000 ceiling I just seems kind of low for that kind of aircraft and the speeds that it’s able to perform maybe that’s just me

    • @2tall2009
      @2tall2009 5 років тому

      A FL250 is normal for a single engine jet, the Vision jet has a max of FL280, the D-jet was going to be FL250 also, and all 3 are using the same engine FJ33

  • @geobely
    @geobely 5 років тому +2

    I love the doors and the center joystick but what ever happen to the piper single jet Altair ?

  • @PilotFun101
    @PilotFun101 5 років тому +8

    Thank you for sharing!!

  • @gabbyhayes1568
    @gabbyhayes1568 5 років тому +2

    It sounds like it'll be half the price of the Honda jet, but then again it's a smaller aircraft too.

  • @kleinbottled79
    @kleinbottled79 3 роки тому

    No no the stick and throttle positions look fine.

  • @alexdarcydestsimon3767
    @alexdarcydestsimon3767 Рік тому

    I remember watching this video quite a few times but somehow i did not put a "like" on it.
    I couldn't remember why until i saw the suicide doors.

  • @avflyguy
    @avflyguy 5 років тому

    It's going to be certified in Poland first. UM.... thinking of the Wilga for some reason. Although the PZL M-18 Dromader was fairly decent AG sprayer 30 years ago. It even had a back seat to carry the mechanic along. What could possibly go wrong

  • @ayokay123
    @ayokay123 3 роки тому

    Sounds too good to be true, especially if they can surpass the 25,000 ceiling height.
    Only negative is that it looks like that luggage compartment won't even hold a standard carry-on. Perhaps the video is misleading.

  • @hendriksmedia
    @hendriksmedia 5 років тому

    A very fluent speaker.

  • @Phenolisothiocyanate
    @Phenolisothiocyanate 4 роки тому +6

    I've got two words for you: Predator drones.

  • @sasquatchhadarock968
    @sasquatchhadarock968 5 років тому

    Center stick? I like it.

  • @raselahmad6500
    @raselahmad6500 5 років тому

    this is amazing and unbelievable.

  • @coolhari2000
    @coolhari2000 5 років тому +2

    Looks like the same fuselage as the vision jet!!!

  • @AZIFMIKAYRE
    @AZIFMIKAYRE 5 років тому +10

    A mini cooper with wings

  • @superbmediacontentcreator
    @superbmediacontentcreator 5 років тому +3

    This thing would be sheer torture in bright sun... whew...

  • @birdman1843
    @birdman1843 4 роки тому

    Reminds me of the Cirrus

  • @carlosc3768
    @carlosc3768 5 років тому +1

    The "spacious" interior reminds me of the Lotus Evora....

    • @rosebarnes9625
      @rosebarnes9625 4 роки тому

      It's a plane, why can't they strech the cabin 2 ft? Probably improve aerodynamics and only cost $140.00 in extra material.... what's $140.00 on a $1.8 M plane?

  • @rollsroyce6920
    @rollsroyce6920 5 років тому +2

    Would be nice to watch the flight.

  • @cbdcbd5996
    @cbdcbd5996 5 років тому

    real comfy! LOL.. that guy is probably all of 5'4!!!

  • @trangenusa
    @trangenusa 5 років тому

    I like it better than the rear V tail design, which is breaking off. and it's single engine so you don't have to get certified in multi-engine.
    And I'll bet it saves on fuel too. And with that parachute, it's like an air bag in a car, to take care of all your passengers.

  • @bige6560
    @bige6560 5 років тому +1

    i wanna fly this

  • @sichere
    @sichere 5 років тому +1

    "When" you need to use the emergency chute is more of a certainty unlike "if" or "in case" you need to use the emergency chute.

  • @LarryTheTubaBoy
    @LarryTheTubaBoy 5 років тому

    1:07 Ah yes, good, the seats can be readily adjusted for high people... folks like myself and Harrison Ford can appreciate that.

  • @thecman26
    @thecman26 5 років тому

    Cool plane!

  • @bigemugamer
    @bigemugamer 5 років тому

    0:48 - 1:30 easy to understand tutorial on how to properly enter and exit this type of vehicle.

  • @rogerbrant7232
    @rogerbrant7232 5 років тому +1

    Listening to this guy is like watching a car rust .... Geeesss

  • @thehusarpl8822
    @thehusarpl8822 3 роки тому

    Maby its small but this price, speed, range and you need only 250m runway... the best single engine aircraft!

  • @paidtourist6563
    @paidtourist6563 3 роки тому

    If they raise the flight level to at least 41,000 feet and install the Garmin 3000...I'm sold. Til then, I think the Vision Jet is still a bit more attractive to a pilot

  • @XaymacaJah
    @XaymacaJah 5 років тому

    oohh ok.. I see the idea for the vault like locks now.

  • @gendaminoru3195
    @gendaminoru3195 5 років тому

    Ill conceived, but then I am biased by the Aerostar jet and friend's Premier for VLJs, and my friend who design the Eclips 400 in a weekend.

  • @drampadreg1386
    @drampadreg1386 3 роки тому

    Hmm. since the patent on the PT-6 expired there are a lot of turbine props with similar performance, some even faster and they may not cost so much to run, but they probably cost about the same money. Maybe I'll wait for the long range jet suit, hope it has autopilot.

  • @RAo-hx8jc
    @RAo-hx8jc 9 місяців тому

    Awesome plane . Fast enough to not need a restroomZ I am an enthusiast but I can’t see why people spend millions for these planes with no toilet, it escapes me.

  • @AClark-jy2yf
    @AClark-jy2yf 5 років тому

    Imho, would be much better with side-sticks or yokes and center throttle lever. Should at least make it optional. Maybe current layout is due to cramped cabin space?

  • @hotdogpaluca
    @hotdogpaluca 4 роки тому

    I think they could have had a better presenter . He could have told us how tall he was as he got in so a self comparison. Nice plane with super performance but for me I'm still looking for an 86 or 87 Malibu.

  • @juancatabares
    @juancatabares 5 років тому

    I think it would be a good drone !!

  • @radwi69
    @radwi69 5 років тому

    Wow, my next dream “vehicle "..... but 1.8 is bit too steep for polish made flying vessel!

  • @rfresh1011
    @rfresh1011 5 років тому +2

    The doors being hinged at the rear is big mistake...what were they thinking?

    • @saxonsoldier67
      @saxonsoldier67 5 років тому

      Polish joke inserted here. Poles do things bass ackwards.

    • @mieszkosuweren
      @mieszkosuweren 5 років тому

      @@saxonsoldier67 brits are fake news

  • @garrygballard8914
    @garrygballard8914 5 років тому +1

    Very interesting ! Don't like luggage compartment so far back, weight and balance concerns. Plus its really small for four people. Leg room for back seat is cramped at best good seating for children. Would like to know more about the structural Integrity for the engine mounts and structure. What was the pricing ?

    • @achraf1245
      @achraf1245 5 років тому

      For the cheap price of 1.8 m $

  • @rlguerrero2263
    @rlguerrero2263 5 років тому

    Seems the perfect solution for crosscountry operation between the agricultural regions of Brazil.
    There is a disadvantage of being produced in american dolars , what multiplie his prices on the Brazilian market. If was build in reais, woould have a bigger potential market.

  • @kitosman9057
    @kitosman9057 5 років тому

    NICE ...WITH SAFETY IF ANYTHING WHEN WRONG....

  • @wildcard5269
    @wildcard5269 4 роки тому

    Great Presentation but the take-off distance is too long which relates to power if not load of the aircraft.

  • @rlguerrero2263
    @rlguerrero2263 5 років тому

    So far, 53 comments out of 356 are skeptical about the safety of the doors. Seems this must be changed otherwise will kill the project entirely.
    And could the parachute be positioned on the side of the engine mounting?

  • @michaelc2528
    @michaelc2528 5 років тому

    Sweet little bird!

  • @sleelakrishnan
    @sleelakrishnan 4 роки тому

    I am so loving it 😍😍😍😍😍

  • @kadj1016
    @kadj1016 5 років тому +25

    Does this thing actually fly? I have heard a lot of talk, and saw some taxiing down the runway, but missed the actual flying part.

    • @zygmund18
      @zygmund18 5 років тому +9

      it doesnt fly, When I was in on the summer internship as a aircraft mechanic in 2015 I saw the prototype. Co-workers in there told me the maiden flight will be performed in next few weeks, almost 4 years and nothing happened, whole project is another scam to drain off public funds. Company which funds design of flaris has never made any single plane, this company is called metal master

    • @kadj1016
      @kadj1016 5 років тому +4

      Thanks Adam.. I thought it kind of suspicious when they taxi'd all over and never left the ground.

    • @jacekzielinski5164
      @jacekzielinski5164 5 років тому

      They just had permission to fly..
      Certification just starting then...

    • @biggestfastestmostamazing6952
      @biggestfastestmostamazing6952 5 років тому +1

      The first flight was today. They did a total 26 take offs and landings.

    • @meldondglord7930
      @meldondglord7930 4 роки тому

      You are liar. They already are very close to get certification later this year.

  • @chmielo82
    @chmielo82 5 років тому

    Great Plane !!! love it

  • @Watcher-vh5rd
    @Watcher-vh5rd 4 роки тому

    for 1.8 million i would expect this plane to have 2 engines.

  • @RLTtizME
    @RLTtizME 5 років тому +2

    When I eat Mexican food, I get Flaris like you wouldn't believe. I can clear a room.

  • @Sularus76
    @Sularus76 5 років тому

    Hey a Mojo. I'm in FL and hold a private pilots certificate. I'm bilingual fluent in Spanish. I say all this incase you have thought about expanding your channel and want someone to do Spanish content for you. I figure it's easier than starting my own channel and it's a plus for you. I'm not greedy and easy going. I also have a BS in Aviation and Aerospace with concentrations on airport and FBO management. Before that I was in IT for 15 years. Made it up to IT director and General manager which is a super weird title to give the IT guy. Shoot me a message if your interested. Thanks and keep up the good work. By the way I'm also Starting a Cozy build on my property. Hope to hear from you.

  • @sleelakrishnan
    @sleelakrishnan 4 роки тому

    awesome buddy

  • @wololo10
    @wololo10 7 місяців тому

    The flat panels bezels look much better

  • @YanksOnTop
    @YanksOnTop 5 років тому

    That whole detachable wing-thing just freaks me out...

    • @okamijubei
      @okamijubei 4 роки тому

      Even it has an emergency parachute?

  • @kevinrtres
    @kevinrtres 4 роки тому

    250m takeoff 600m landing, not bad....compare that to a LongEZ for perspective.