*A like, share or sub helps a lot. Thank you* All Radeon 890M/Ryzen AI HX 370 Tests: ua-cam.com/play/PLqVHurHrK3FhWpyfU84FAQW0hJ0jj7EgZ.html 0:00 Devil May Cry 5, 1080p high 2:40 God of War,1080p original 4:08 Hellblade,1080p high 5:34 Cyberpunk 2077,1080p low 6:40 Resident Evil 6,1080p max 7:31 Robocop,1080p (85%) low 10:30 The First Descendant,1080p medium 11:49 Forza Horizon 5,1080p high (RT off) 13:19 Tomb Raider (2013),1080p max 14:22 Shadow of The Tomb Raider, 1080p high Vivobook S16 M5606WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Radeon 890M iGPU 32GB LPDDR5X-7500 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (RE6, DMC5: Ryzen 7 5700G) Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4GB 2x16GB DDR4-4000
they don't have the consistency of nvidia, one gen is mah, one is good, one is awful, and so on... the vast majority of people don't read the review and just listen to the seller, and the seller maybe know half the truth about what he sell and is based a lot on the former generation... so NV is just a safe bate for most to recommend. and people who do read the reviews and in to computers will just bite the bullet and pay 50-100$ for better power and better DLSS/RT...
@@bhaveshsonar7558 RDNA1 okish, no high end, no upscale options ( when lunched), no RT, i would rather have a 2060 over 5700XT today. RDNA 2 ok performance, bad RT, mediocre upscaler. some good card in the line like the 6800XT and 6700XT. RDNA 3 mah, they invest so much in the multi chip thing that they forgot to work on the actual architecture. i chose the 4070ti over the 7900XT. RDNA 4 finally fix the RT ( looks like it will be better but not as good as NV), still mediocre upscaler. oops no high end card again... what consistency? of being consistently mediocre ? and that is only the last 4 generations.
@@gametime4316 Truth in it's full form, unfortunately no matter how many AMD fans jump at me for always picking NVIDIA regardless of gen or build or purpose of the computer I am building, one thing always stays true, AMD's technology and implementation is awful, their RT performance is subpar and practically nonexistant pre-RDNA4 which still hasn't been properly benchmarked and ever since RDNA1's release they've been nothing but glorified gaming only graphics cards. Now imagine me buying an AMD card when I work fulltime with HLSL and CUDA... Career suicide if I ever decide to take workdays for home! They'd start calling me mid compile to ask if I died on the desk from waiting so long.
I'd expect 890M to reach 1060/RX580 comfortably or even 3050 6GB. because 780M was supposed to match desktop 1650 already. And 890M was supposed to be like 20 to 30 percent faster than 780M.
@@Abdi_Akhmet we'll see. but driver updates at best will increase the performance by 5%. 10% at most. there is never a case where performance improvement going up 30% across all tittles because of driver updates/optimization.
nah.. price wise you could buy at least half a dozen or so 1650 for the cost of one Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 - it's good for APU's going forward, but they need to be cheap to take over the Intel UHD as one of the most populous APUs on the market.
This is incredible, finally a real decent iGPU, i am really amazed because is an iGPU which is like smaller then a dGPU has no VRAM but RAM only and has this extreme performance this is incredible.
impressive in some game not so much in others. i think the games the 890 have a nice lead is games that the 4GB kill the 1650 or games that mesh shaders are used. just to put things in perspective the 1650 is about as strong as the RX 6400, the RX 6400 has the same core config as the 680M (12 CU RDNA2) but with out the infinity cache and GDDR6. is it the best APU out there, easy yes... could it been even better ? i think so ( with 16/32MB infinity cache and or a 196 bit bus)
AFMF 2 is much better than DLSS FG ever will be, it works on literally 100x the amount of games DLSS are in, while you can use DLSS in maybe 1~2% (that's being generous) of all games that ever existed, AFMF 2 works in around 70~80%, it works even in emulators now, there is no contest.
I believe not, 2900 is a crazy high clock even for dGPUs, if he could push more power in a ATX formfactor with better temps probly would get better performance
At this rate within a decade or so nVidia will be almost out of the gaming market, except for the Nintendo Switch and some niche market of desktop gamers. The future is for light-weight low-power gaming laptops, and as of now nVidia has no presence there at all. nVidia also has no presence in consoles, nor in handheld gaming devices.
Las comparaciones de rendimiento tienes que hacerlas en el Gameplay. Están usando las Cinemáticas para comparar. Da lo mismo el hardware son los mismos FPS
Beating an old gpu that was underpowered when it was released is not impressive. Try compare with ps5 soc, that is an apu as well and is equal to a rx 6700
*A like, share or sub helps a lot. Thank you*
All Radeon 890M/Ryzen AI HX 370 Tests:
ua-cam.com/play/PLqVHurHrK3FhWpyfU84FAQW0hJ0jj7EgZ.html
0:00 Devil May Cry 5, 1080p high
2:40 God of War,1080p original
4:08 Hellblade,1080p high
5:34 Cyberpunk 2077,1080p low
6:40 Resident Evil 6,1080p max
7:31 Robocop,1080p (85%) low
10:30 The First Descendant,1080p medium
11:49 Forza Horizon 5,1080p high (RT off)
13:19 Tomb Raider (2013),1080p max
14:22 Shadow of The Tomb Raider, 1080p high
Vivobook S16 M5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Radeon 890M iGPU
32GB LPDDR5X-7500
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (RE6, DMC5: Ryzen 7 5700G)
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4GB
2x16GB DDR4-4000
AMD has Really Come a Long Way Chipwise and Boys We're here for it!
The little R890M iGPU is pretty impressive! 😀
Price wise is awful
I could build better pc with that price
@@leexy3395That's actually true, a 890M cost more that an entry level gaming PC
@@leexy3395not really it's not a dog we don't even know the price of the apu
Its nothing compared to the Q2 2025 Strix Halo version... from 16 compute units to 40 compute units, double the performance.
Nice to see an iGPU squeezed into a laptop beating a desktop GPU (75W alone). Compare it with the 3050 mobile!
it has too. iGPU improvement has been very slow. and 1650 is being built on 12nm node which is a variant of 16nm process.
@@arenzricodexd440910 yrs ago we had A10 💀
So that’s why AMD rebounded In the market, they’re severely undervalued
they don't have the consistency of nvidia, one gen is mah, one is good, one is awful, and so on...
the vast majority of people don't read the review and just listen to the seller, and the seller maybe know half the truth about what he sell and is based a lot on the former generation...
so NV is just a safe bate for most to recommend.
and people who do read the reviews and in to computers will just bite the bullet and pay 50-100$ for better power and better DLSS/RT...
@@gametime4316they do have consistency
@@bhaveshsonar7558 RDNA1 okish, no high end, no upscale options ( when lunched), no RT, i would rather have a 2060 over 5700XT today.
RDNA 2 ok performance, bad RT, mediocre upscaler. some good card in the line like the 6800XT and 6700XT.
RDNA 3 mah, they invest so much in the multi chip thing that they forgot to work on the actual architecture. i chose the 4070ti over the 7900XT.
RDNA 4 finally fix the RT ( looks like it will be better but not as good as NV), still mediocre upscaler.
oops no high end card again...
what consistency? of being consistently mediocre ?
and that is only the last 4 generations.
They won't be beating an 3 trillion dollar company aka Nvidia any time soon
@@gametime4316 Truth in it's full form, unfortunately no matter how many AMD fans jump at me for always picking NVIDIA regardless of gen or build or purpose of the computer I am building, one thing always stays true, AMD's technology and implementation is awful, their RT performance is subpar and practically nonexistant pre-RDNA4 which still hasn't been properly benchmarked and ever since RDNA1's release they've been nothing but glorified gaming only graphics cards.
Now imagine me buying an AMD card when I work fulltime with HLSL and CUDA... Career suicide if I ever decide to take workdays for home! They'd start calling me mid compile to ask if I died on the desk from waiting so long.
I'd expect 890M to reach 1060/RX580 comfortably or even 3050 6GB. because 780M was supposed to match desktop 1650 already. And 890M was supposed to be like 20 to 30 percent faster than 780M.
I think it is already. Maybe in the future it will come with the updates.
@@Abdi_Akhmet we'll see. but driver updates at best will increase the performance by 5%. 10% at most. there is never a case where performance improvement going up 30% across all tittles because of driver updates/optimization.
@@arenzricodexd4409 yes, in this situation we can say only that performance like 30-40 series of rtx will expect in 2-3 years. I hope so
@@Abdi_Akhmetmore like 6 years lol
@@niebuhr6197 It's already here, Strix Halo can match rtx 4070 with 40 CUs
0:44 move fast baby don't be slow
My 1650 got massacred 😭😭
nah.. price wise you could buy at least half a dozen or so 1650 for the cost of one Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 - it's good for APU's going forward, but they need to be cheap to take over the Intel UHD as one of the most populous APUs on the market.
1650 still a great budget option
@@KimKim-mt2bb nvidia no longer make 1650. it is being replaced by 3050 6GB.
@@arenzricodexd4409rtx 3050 6gb sucks. People can buy 2070 for same price 2nd hand.Or maybe you could buy rx 6600 almost the same price
@@arenzricodexd4409 I would say 1650 is better than 3050 6gb bc it isnt a big jump in my opinion
This is incredible, finally a real decent iGPU, i am really amazed because is an iGPU which is like smaller then a dGPU has no VRAM but RAM only and has this extreme performance this is incredible.
yo even the laptop can match 5800x3d system
acually beat by large margin in fh5 and cp77
Nice work. Would love to see vs RTX 2050 & RTX 3050.
I always try to test on many different game engines, Any suggestions?
try cryengine?
Why don't you show wattage on the 1650 GPU? It would be nice to compare more than just the raw performance numbers..
The AI CPU is comparable to 5800x3d even without the 3D cache. this is crazy.
can't wait for these to ship with mini PCs
impressive in some game not so much in others.
i think the games the 890 have a nice lead is games that the 4GB kill the 1650 or games that mesh shaders are used.
just to put things in perspective the 1650 is about as strong as the RX 6400, the RX 6400 has the same core config as the 680M (12 CU RDNA2) but with out the infinity cache and GDDR6.
is it the best APU out there, easy yes...
could it been even better ? i think so ( with 16/32MB infinity cache and or a 196 bit bus)
There will be strix halo
@@bhaveshsonar7558 ya, too hot for handhelds but a step in the right direction
@@gametime4316 you don't have to run at max clocks/TDP, you can run lower clocks on a cut down SKU
@@yeshwantkethineni3694 ya but i think that at 30W it will be starved of power...
but it will be nice to see strix point vs strix halo at 30W.
@@bhaveshsonar7558 that thing is pretty much cpu being strap with gpu in single package.
10w performance? Can try old games
The only downside of this iGPU is that you don't have dlss.
Nither 1650
But look into AFMF2, AMD just announced it and AFMF2 along with FSR is insane, bumping from 60-80fps to 150 or above.
AFMF 2 is much better than DLSS FG ever will be, it works on literally 100x the amount of games DLSS are in, while you can use DLSS in maybe 1~2% (that's being generous) of all games that ever existed, AFMF 2 works in around 70~80%, it works even in emulators now, there is no contest.
no shit lol
@@GhOsThPk amfs2 is shit, useless as it looks like shit. Cant even compare. You are right about one thing: no contest :D
so for light gaming, all i need is a ryzen ai 300 cpu laptop.
Wait for the 40 CU strix halo with rdna 3 .. should easily beat the mobile 3070, rtx 4060..but with no memory contrainsts
but can 890m overclocked for now
I believe not, 2900 is a crazy high clock even for dGPUs, if he could push more power in a ATX formfactor with better temps probly would get better performance
How are thermals and heat after a long gaming session?🤔 and does FPS drop significantly during gametime?
FPS never drop, thermals are always fine even in max tdp mode
Wow. 890M is sometimes better, than the 1650. Does the powerusage show the powerusage of the whole APU?
What about the powerusage on the right side?
Geforce gddr5 or gddr6?
Do you have a 3050 laptop and 4050 laptop for test as well?
Thats still Strix Point, imagine the Strix Halo, probly will blow a 3070
bandwidth will probably most likely going to hamper Strix Halo performance.
@@arenzricodexd4409 So?
@@DesocupadoXtremo before this 780M also was talked about reaching RTX3060 like performance. the reality is it perform like 1650.
@@arenzricodexd4409only people with little idea about HW seriously considered that Amd could reach even the lowest powered 3060
This is great
Oh! You did this comparison already!
Great!
Let's see!
At this rate within a decade or so nVidia will be almost out of the gaming market, except for the Nintendo Switch and some niche market of desktop gamers. The future is for light-weight low-power gaming laptops, and as of now nVidia has no presence there at all. nVidia also has no presence in consoles, nor in handheld gaming devices.
This is mobile GPU in CPU vs desktop video card,. awesome!
Laptops will be strong.
Radeon 890M is pretty impressive 😅 really close to 1650 and outperforms 1650 in some games.
Is it GTX1650 with GDDR6 or GDDR5 memory?
memory overclock should make wonders
Try Baldur's gate 3 please
Shove this in a hand held?
890m is superior in several games with a percentage of 5 to 10 percent
Las comparaciones de rendimiento tienes que hacerlas en el Gameplay. Están usando las Cinemáticas para comparar. Da lo mismo el hardware son los mismos FPS
Beating an old gpu that was underpowered when it was released is not impressive.
Try compare with ps5 soc, that is an apu as well and is equal to a rx 6700
this is not a d GPU wtf are talking about idiot, matching even 'old" legit graphic card is very good
And PS5 draw 250 Watts more power than the laptop chip
1650 is top notch for 20 years old game.
How perform the 780m and 890m in apps like Blender oder other 3D apps in viewport performance and render performance?
Render is slow just like any amd card. You'll need Nvidia
Gtx 1650 GDDR6 ?
Ryzen 4070 looking good
Wow, defeating a five year old, super low end GPU; I am shocked...
GTX 1650 uses more power and still gets beaten. This test shows that new technology is always more efficient than the old ones.
Whats the wattage on the 1650?
whole system probably 200W
Wtf no actual gameplay 😡
I thought it would the same as 3060😂
no way bro
and this is rdna 3.5 right?? i wonder if rdna 4 would give massive increase
Put 400+ on memory clock on gtx 1650 and it will out matched that IGPU hahaha
and even its true, ITS A IGPU not a DGPU YOU IDIOT
Give me new Steam Deck
this APU is atleast 75W useless comparison.