Very interesting! You are amplifying the di-electric field by aligning the coil horizontally! You could say this coil is the "polar opposite" of a solenoid coil :D The reason you don't feel either repulsion or attraction between the coils is, like you pointed out yourself, that the two mirrored north and south pole vortices are occupying the same space, which means that the centrifugal and centripetal forces reaching out of each pole (that have their spin direction mirrored between the poles), balance out in the same space so that each of the coils won't be affected by other coherent (north-south aligned) magnetic fields. But you will still see the compass needle align itself along the magnetic field, because the coil still has coherent magnetic alignment (north-south), and because the needle has its poles separated enough that each pole's magnetic spin vortices can align separately with the coil's. Basically, any object with magnetic field coherence and with enough distance between it's two poles will be affected, or rather affect itself when near the coil.
Remember you are creating a standing Magnetic field running in both directions in balance to itself hence the two don't repel each other because both are like gyroscopic balanced fields rotating in both directions at once as a standing wave one wave north south the other south north unlike a thyroid wound transformer where the wire is wound crossing the direction of magnetic flow
Check the field with your compass when the two coils are together. Because n and s originate at the center of each coil, the difference in the poles cancel when they are brought together. Thats why solenoid coils are wound vertically.
If you want to try something amazing make a disk with neodymium magnets embedded in it evenly spaced then place two bifilar coils on either side and spin the inner magnet disk.
Doing this would likely disrupt the transmitter capability of our parasitic nanotech that has effectively glommed onto our bio-tissues, and finally allow us to slough it out. Disrupt the field, people! Evict this s#!* once and for all . . .
I've seen a few now that have gotten into the bifilar pancakes, and you are bang on with it, and understanding the standing wave energy transfer aspect of it! and resonance, Well done Sir!
Good information, You cannot feel a strong magnetic atraction-repulsion because the magnetic flux density of this coils is small due to the great surface area
Fortunately, unlike gravity the magnetic field created in an electromagnet has a 'gas pedal.' For example: on a thin plastic lab table reach under with a magnet placed against the underside surface of the thin plastic table top,, then on top of the table, put a small metal object like a coin (a nickel, say) or something ferrous and small in size. Now under the table move the magnet around -- the object on top of the table will follow the magnet. Now put a 50 pound iron block on the table top and move the magnet around under the table's surface again. The magnetic field is too weak to move the 50lbs iron object. But get a larger electromagnet with a high voltage -- you can then move the 50lb iron object because the magnetic field is stronger. What I'm implying is, I believe if you put higher voltage on your electromagnets the sense of attraction/repulsion will be more noticeable. If you think about it, you could power up those coils with very high voltage to the point of corona that will ionize surrounding air. Somewhere below that voltage level you'll feel the repulsion or attraction between the 2 coils more pronounced.
you'll need to measure the field with the Gauss meter. the explanation to why attraction and repulsion is very weak is because there's a differential between the applied voltage and the radius of the coil . So as the field expands the field velocity or flux ( measured with a Gauss meter ) gets weaker . try measuring the reading difference between the small magnets and large ones. At a frequency, the smaller the SPACE the higher the capacitance just like comparing ultra violet to infrared waves.
Thank you, This is the best explanation of the paths of the sun and the moon. I know you may not be a FE but you are showing the paths of the sun and moon in perfect harmony. Thanks. Trace the paths of the eclipses on a flat map, and it makes circles as you are showing.
yes, in fact there is only a static field when there is dc. I found out the compass needle deviated due to the dc pulsed coil (to get the parallel coil resonant). So a resonant coil, does not have a static magnetic field.
@@TravisTellsTruths no. He said he made a mistake. He forgot that he isn't using true AC to run the coil, he is using pulsed DC which will make a field that will not change direction, BUT it IS varying in size and strength. It is not static like a magnet
Hi Ivo, Excellent video and perspective on the field. Thanks for sharing I think you have shown that there is no North or South poles, that's just terms we use when using two magnets together. kk
KenKlondike there is a qualitative difference between a North Pole field South Pole field. If you expose seeds to the south pole of a magnet they will flourish and be healthy many of the seeds will sprout most of them. If you expose the same seeds to a North Pole field you will have far fewer sprouting acidic sick plants. Look up the magnetic blueprint of life Davis. ua-cam.com/video/Dv4aqgZa7oc/v-deo.html
I guess it's because the mag flux is through the center hole of air, and air cannot hold the coil body (not attached), that might be why the coils don't attract to each other well, if you paste an iron coin to each coil hole, they might then attract to each other and hold the coils together (attached).
Bifilar coil geometry aligns with the dielectric plane of inertia, solenoid follows more closely the geometry of the dielectric hyperbaloid, wich for those who don't know, is the causation of the magnetic toroid
Can u buit 2 cube with water and iron filings inside then sandwhich the bifilar to those cubes and smash the on button so we can see the 3d model of magnetic field?
It is unclear in your description if you are talking about a standard pancake coil that would produce a conjoined N/S pole or a bifilar coil which I think would have the fields cancel themselves out. This would be an excellent comparison to demonstrate the difference along with your solenoid. Also try putting a nail in the center of the coils with a washer to demonstrate the respective strength of the fields and the amount of force required to dislodge it.
I use a series connected bifilar coil, that does not cancel the magnetic fields. As described in nikola tesla's patent 512340. a ferrous core would enhance the induction and there for the magnetic field strenght.
Thru my think process and other vide to give me an idea and comment below, well, it shows all ideas that are different is connect to one to new idea and understanding. So, the poles that is smaller together show a magnetic field that is small which it curves over the edge, which it is 180 curve, so that magnetic field is an average of smaller magnet field which it curves over to edge to edge, and the center of edge, the smaller one where windings lines, so the primary is dielectric field where the space is at, the magnet field where is mass is at, so the magnet field is intensity range, so it is not a barrier which all spaces are a dielectric field, so the dependently of mass is depend on magnet field so both are linked. So, the dielectric field is a pressure field in which it is one direction that has seemingly two-pole which it is one pole whole that is forward from the back and back away from forward, which attracts to repel. So, the compass move strongly when the pole is wider because the dielectric field is bigger in space so the center is higher, which each average center of wingings to add up to the whole center, so when you have two mass that meets at center, so it interacts which it is standing mass so the volt increase so that is why it is important to have windings. So, you didn't use magnet which it is special made so not natural made, so it shows in same way how magnet work, so when combining two knowledge, the easy magnet to harder magnet so you can understand how anything work. So, the turns to space to turns so each turns create an electricity since it depends by impact of dieletricity field which each is north, so all north go forward, and all south go forward, so it curves around the mass thru the magnet field, thru two planes that are vertical 180 and horizontal 180, so it becomes 90 degree, which it is really two 180 squares. so those two 180 meets that create push and pull, but the close pole is too small so the impact of N and S is weak, if further away, the impact of N and S is stronger, but not too far. So, it is about a balance of anything. So, all space is a dielectricity field which it is non-electricity but the source of electricity which two dielectric field that meets which N and S, so it causes interact to create current thru bigger intensity of magnet which two meets. So, two-pole that is closer together creates cancel out magnet field which it is a dynamic magnetic field that expand to contract which two magnet field meets so it cancel out like the impact cause jolt like push a person and the person will be jolt as it move faster in motion base on my push, so the person move faster than the person's alone than apart that don't cancel out which it is a standing magnet field. So, it is not smooth expand, which it can be, but it also can be a jolt, so it depends how fast you push and pull and back and forth in a faster way, so that is what impulse is, so the dielectric expand which like in gravity wheel where the spin is faster so the pressure is higher so it pushes you to wall, like in car. So, it is accelerating. So, when the magnet field collapse it is because another magnet field push it out and if it gets weak, so it gets de-expand by expanding of the weakening magnet field. So, it is about a balance that is a tug of war. So, the N side is impact field to join another impact, so it is not parallel in motion, but interact which I say join. So, interact might be better in word because I look for impact on opposite of impact, so it says disjoin, so interact is join. The S side is losing impact which it is disjoin so it absorbs to dielectricity field so in macro point of view it is attracts, so it join as it is repeling from macro point of view which the dieletricity field causes impact which it is magnet field so when the dieletricity field impact another dieletricity field so it creases electricity so as current thru magnet so it join so that is impact that is after repel. To summary above: Dielectricity field, magnet field, electricity field in order as source field that is either repel or attract, so the repel part is disjoined so it absorbs dielectricity field of that mass, so the mass is a geography and orientation of dielectricity field, so it also a space density as a range that is low to high depending on mass itself. So, the attract field is a join so it repels dieletricity field of that mass so well, I did look for opposite word of interact, so it says disjoin, so I use to join, so join do not fit well with interact? So, the impact of two joins, so that interacts which a person says I will join you, it doesn't mean interact, so, the wrong term to use. So, will use the opposite of interact so the interact of two joins creates a current which the current form a magnetic field which magnet field reduces or increase in impact as a range so the dielectricity field expand base on impact. So, there is standing dielectricty, s magnet field, s electricity field, or dynamic dielectricity field, d magnet, etc, so base on above video, you put current, so the dielectricity field expand, even the pole to pole do not expand because it is not horizontal expand, but vertical expand which the space density increase with higher current, so when you put high volt thru separate pole, the repel and attract is higher, so the repel and attract is higher when it is close together. Even more clear that is dielectricity is an energy field that has direction parallel to mass like you turn magnet it repels or attracts even it is same mass, but the direction does change. Magnet is an intensity field as a range that depends on mass, so it is a carrier when the dielectricity field meets as cancel out of repel and attract so it becomes a standing wave so that standing wave is a current thru the magnet field so magnet field is a bridge, a carrier bridge which the carrier is electrons. Magnet field does depend on the impact which magnet has its own impact within so the current is very low. So, it is all about perspective, but it is all same at a micro level to macro level like fractal pattern. So, mass is a radiant energy mass since it is small to hold the mass itself so interact of opposite dielectricity to become electricity field which it is holding by magnet field and it can be move which if the volt move thru the mass, the result of wire absorbs current is certain, so the magnet is same because the mass does not move unless it is impacted by another opposite mass. So, your cd that is two of them, is exactly the same in wire connect, so one side is same that is one color to another side. So, both side is a revolving like a mirror which forward curve and backward curve from mirror, which it depends by parallel position mass but the opposite side of position mass. So, below to above mass is same as a mirror, so it proves it is all about a different kind of interact of one, which you have two cd that meets, so it creates oppose magnet field so at same time create electricity field. So, it is not from motion alone as a primary but interacts of two opposite. So, if interact of two opposite is constant in position per distance so it is standing field so mass is a standing magnet field. So, the electricity field is the jolt of dieletricity field. So, it creates next level of density like water that is one line in bathtub so when you put finger in it, the water rise, so my finger is a mass that is standing magnet so it interacts with opposite magnet of water so it raises so magnet field expand or collapse depending on mass itself that is para- or other kinds. So, when magnetic field is in motion vertical, so the dielectricity field is in motion horizontal, so it is 90 degree. Or 180 square, well, not 180 square, but 180 cube. So, the volt go down or up depending on magnet collapse to expand in order.
I found this old video that addresses the intereaction (in one small part of the video) of flat magnets. Hope it's useful, if you haven't seen it before. Professor Eric Laithwaite: Motors Big and Small-1971. It's on UA-cam. Cheers-Stewart Caldwell, PhD
You said the magnetic field was static maybe if you pulse the coils at a resonant frequency the result might be different, or try a wider center hole to create a bigger vortex
+Jason Mc.Dougall indeed, I did. I made the hole PHI ratio to the windings, and I'm pulsing them with short energetic spikes of energy, creating non magnetic resonance. I've got more videos about this.
Very cool! Its getting me exited a scalor attacked.lol little joke but it is intence understanding. It remind me of the bifillor galaxy coil i. Created. You will love it.let me repost it on my fb if i can find a pic of it. Bravo well done.
Would you get different results if the coil were deformed into a conical shape? I am imagining that there may be interference between your coils and so I wonder if the airgap created by the conical arrangement would be enough to prevent the interference.
is the Efield more perpendicular to magnetic field in this coil, or would it be more so with conical coil i wonder. so there is a north pole in center and a diffuse south pole like our PLANEt?
hi Mr. Ivo I know you have been working alot with pancake coils, and I was wondering what would happen to the magnetic field in the center if we add a small piece of iron core; Will the magnetism be concentrated in this small circular area?? What is your guess?
the inductance of the coil would be amplified. So the magnetic field strenght would be stronger. Iron is good for DC, but not for high frequency AC (resonance), then a MnZn ferrite core would be better. I would also suggest using an iron or ferrite core, with a hole in the center (like a donut).
MasterIvo! I am truly enjoying your videos, much to learn and plenty to rewatch! I enjoy your approach and explanation! Thank you! Question: when you utilize a dielectric material (99.9% Bismuth) to go through the midpoint on the bifilar coil, is there a change in the amount of voltage? I am curious if there would be something like an inverted motor solution which could be leveraged with bifilar coils and dielectric material to simulate the 'Bloch wall' shifting as it does with most permanent magnet motors. Just fun thoughts, and spreading the knowledge I have happened across in my journeys! Take care,
18:05 I think because this is all copper, you won't feel the force. You need some magnetic metal plates on the back of each one, then you would feel it I think.
I wondered whether the windings are interfering with one another when you put the two coils side by side. Would a bismuth insulator placed between them ptoduce a different effect?
when u got bifilar coil, south magnetic part of the field from upper coil and north part of the bottom coil cancel them self transforming into dielectric flat plane.
I wouldnt say they cancel out. its like attracting magnets, north and south. the field transform into a (new field) dielectric plane. That also is spiraling like the magnetic field, but now not spacial 3d(magnetic), but flat. Still, the spiraling field, also is observable outside the coils, as a high frequency electric field. All fields are ether(light) fields, the configuration of the field is what is makes it dielectric or magnetic
I think they don’t stick together because the magnetic field is not compounded like that of a solenoid The magnetic field is evenly distributed and not summed
Two people that have made some good progress in this area are: Thane Heins RegenX coil and SkyCollection. Search out their video's or email them and you might get some further ideas for progress.
Speed him up tg 1.5. I kept thinking"for what? What's it good for? How powerful is it?" Which he did address, but they're so weak, I can't see any use for them unless Tesla had figured that out.
Hello, can you make a tutorial video on how to build an induction cooker from scrach? ( components needed, AC 220V so we can plug it directly to the grid, outer diameter of the coil 40cm, temperature reaching 500°Celsius. Thanks
Nothing strange about your results of the field strength, you have a relatively weak field there to be detected by your hends and fingers but quite strong to easily move the very very light compass needle. Part of that is is that you have a very inefficient magnetic circuit, i.e. that of air and no high permeability magnetic material to concentrate the field. I also believe that you have a DC comppnent to the current in your coil, which is caused by - and correct me if I'm wrong - the "unipolar" series of rectangular pulses as shown on your oscilloscope screen. It is this that is causing your polarization of the coil which the compass is detecting. You do not show any values on your scope reading such as the peak voltage of your sine wave and the driving square wave. From memory, your coil resonates at something like 630 kHz, as you are likely aware that the response speed of the compass needle is virtually slower than a snail compared to the resonant frequency of hundreds of kHz or cycles per second so it will respond to the average value same way as it would to a steady DC of the same value. The DC component I mentioned above for a square wave drive, i.e. a wave that has an equal on and off time will have an average DC value of 50% of your peak value. So say you are measuring the voltage of 5V peak, its average will be half of that at 2.5V. How are you measuring your sine wave? Is the scope probe connected across the diven coil? Is the scope DC or AC coupled? Give us some values other than just the resonant frequency. A nice diagram or drawing of your test set up showing how everything is connected would also be of great help to be able to understand your claims. Yor claim, if I understand you correctly that the N and S poles are occupying the same space is also in error as no matter how thinly you slice things, if you can measure the coil thickness and thickness it has because it is wound of a measurable thickness wire, will have the poles seperated by half this thickness, it just gives you an illusion that they ocupy the same space, and I don't mean this in any negative or insulting way, it's all in your imagination. I'm 62 and have been in electronics field, including working on RF equipment with tuned resonant circuits from my late teens, I would in no way consider myself an expert in the field, maybe above average to quote Johnny5, but not a master, unless your use of the word master has a different meaning to what I think it means. Stay inquisitive. Hope there are not too many typos in this. Tablets aren't easy to type on with my fat fingers.
thanks. I agree mostly but, keep in mind, this video is 2 years old, and I've learned a lot (and shared a lot) since then. Master is a title given to me by the children I worked with. I also think it's a rather provoking youtube name, and It indicates my belief of the (spiritual) master within, that I want to acknowledge. It also indicates the apprentice within. as both go together as one.
@@MasterIvo : Re the age of video , I realised that after viewing few more and after I had already posted the comment. Hopefully no offence taken as none was intended.
@@MasterIvo: Just out of curiosity, if you have access to an inductance and capacitance meter to measure the total inductance of the coil and then seperate the two bifilar coils in the middle then measure the capacitance between the two coils. I'd be interested if the resonant frequency that you measured in your test (645kHz) matches that of the calculated value of fr = 1/(2*Pi * (Sqrt(LC))). I'd use some lower frequency such as 10 kHz to measure the L & C as using one closer to theresonance point would likely cause errors in measured values.
I did and it doesn't correlate with the calculated frequency. It was a while back but, remember it measured around 50pF. while it should be 150pF. as you said probably due to measurement error. probe itself was 50pF and I used cheap LCR meters. I now concentrate on impulsing a series resonant bifilar coil. rather interesting effects it gives.
If you ran a steel rod through the center of the coil, would it become magnetized and take on the character of a regular bar magnet?? Your video has made me wonder about that type of magnet... I've never seen one before like that.
Since you are an expert in bifilar pancake coils, do you know if this coil outperforms a standard air loop type coil in terms of broader magnetic field range assuming the same oscillator circuit?
Both windings are on same plane or the pairs are vertical in 2 wire thick pancake? Do you subscribe to spherical spinning voids maintained by counterspace rotational input to counteract small aether viscosity? These combine to form faraday dielectric tubes with ends upon a conductor. Void collase create shockwaves. You know this model?
Yes on the same plane, and yes, they pair vertical in a two wire thick speaker wire pancake. Between the windings is the dielectric field concentrated. I know the model more or less, but for me it seems in complete. I like to think in field vortices, and ring vortex fields.
Scalar waves must be hf hv transients to draw predominantly upon counterspace which acts as a single point "ground" each point drawing from counterspace is considered a zero impedance zero delay songle point ground. There is no space between points in couterspace. It is the power source that tries to maintain intertia and there is no time there in that quantized void. It is a closed manifold held to fixed (in steady state) volume spinning at c. A table is held up by the void interaction. Interia and action reaction are maintained there unless out of steady state.
When tubes between windings on a solenoid leave the coil, the m tubes access cs to form one tube by reconnection in counterspace. They are like wormholes that access rotational energy and small aether sink and sources as a non spacial non temporal void. Without cs angular momentum additions the viscosity would not maintain newtons laws.
Hi, if I have 50meter of wires, and made out of it one bifilar coil, then got another 2 bifilar coils made out of 25meter each and connected the two small ones in series. What will be the difference in inductance between the one big bifilar coil and the two small ones connected in series? or the inductance will be the same?
Hey Master Ivo. Can you please do a experiment with bipolar magnet for me? i wanna know that if our bipolar coil be connected and its power be in use, It gets hot?
does that mean we could then use this coil to make a motor turn also? or what would happen if you made a stator that would take this type of coil put magnets around like a normal motor and use a speed control would it turn? how powerful would it be or could you then use the induction power for other things also with no load impact? i would like any real opinions before attempting to make such a motor myself.
No cedar rapids fpv racing , to make a motor the magnetic fields would have to alternate to make the motor move. I dont think a pancake coil is suitable for that. the strength of this coil lies in its dielectric field. Ive seen these coils used to make a magnet turn, but i dont think they are ideal for that
it looked to me what i saw was the compass pointed only one way when you turned on the coil. so in theory it could be used to push one way only and it made me think about the magnet wheels i've seen. they never work due to eddy current but the try to use a magnet to do the pushing. i was thinking to use this to do the pushing. would that be possible then? of course also if you make the wheel turn then connect a generator viola.
cedar rapids fpv racing i don't really understand what you are saying. maybe try it yourself? the easy way is to roll up speaker wire(or any 2 parallel wires) into a disk.
What happens to the current if an electrical conductor is passed through the Center of one of these coils? Is there a resistance presented or an inductance effect?
Master Ivo so you’re saying the electrical energy was transformed to heat, and you didn’t measure if any current was present. I guess the magnetic field got the electrons moving. How does one control that? Is it a matter of adjusting voltage? Perhaps pulsed DC? A 555 timer circuit, or a transistor, possibly both, a PWM?
@@gregorykusiak5424 sorry, I'm incorrect. I didn't see on which video you replied. I thought we were talking about the radiant circuit I posted 19 april 2019 ua-cam.com/video/1Flj1i0zQ-8/v-deo.html
i've wondered about crystal power... with negative impedance and siemens (impulse, etc...); only with air coils and no magnetic core or iron core... since copper is reluctant and shields the magnetic effect of the coil... and aluminum shielding the electrical or electro part of electromagnetism... what if one wound a(n) helical (air) coil (multilayer, single row... pancake) and placed one on each end of the air coil, as a lid on both sides of the air coil (solenoid, in this case) and shielded the electro (electrical field) of the electromagnetic effect and had a "synthetic" iron core that way to increase the inductance... hence, no iron or physical core at all, only conductors... flux cored? MMF cored; rather... an MMF "flux" core sausage coil (solenoid) and pancaked (a helical, two helicals, or good stack of pancakes (helicals on both end points)) with grannies thick homemade molasses (aluminum)
also, for stability over the permiability of air, in this case, more permeance (right terminology?)... only, with aluminum, shielding out electro of electromagnetism, "synthetic" permiability or however this is tapped into the earths ("vortex") magnetism? nice library of videos and very knowledgeable... oh yeah, and copper electroplated aluminum (foil or mylar foil) sealed/canned around the outside of the whole coil for even more stability and strength/intensity... even wet, cotton coated copper (graphene copper/silver electroplated) wire and possibly introducing steel wire into the winding... even, copper bottom lid/base and aluminum layer between a single pancake (coil as a lid) and the solenoidal air coil... etc... (making poor iron (powder or steel, not ferrite) cores/wire more effective by a low reluctance (copper) vacuum sealed shield or outer layer of the EMI to a higher reluctance source (the coil&/core and its MMF/flux))... a "condensed" EMI coil to match a typical iron/ferrite cored coils performance!
i see a lot of these videos and I'm seeking a starting point. Would the pancake coil be considered as the equator slice of a sphere? Why aren't pancake coils, starship coils, and rodin coil designs combined with tesla coil designs. I have ideas but no real equipment.
Big Bones, yes you can also see it as the middle (bloch wall) of a magnet, or the middle of a toroid (donut). Good question, why isn't this used more? Maybe we first need to understand it better.
With regard to the Hall Effect: There is a little-known invention by Prof. Palmer Craig (1930s) that employed thin films of bismuth sandwiched between flat coils connected in series to exploit a large Hall Effect that appears in a narrow band with weak (terrestrial) magnetic fields. He was able to power radios with it. I suspect that it could be embodied in other forms such as the bifilar coil... www.rexresearch.com/craig/craig.htm
interesting information. but using thin bismuth films isn't easy as it is hard to produce. and it gives only small voltages. fig 2 of the patent in you link seems to show pancake coils with bismuth (capacitor) plates in between. Nodir D has also talked about this setup (without bismuth)
Craig's PhD thesis details the various methods he used to produce Bi films. The best also was easiest: sublimation in vacuo onto mica -- tabletop/garage labwork, no big deal.
The "magnetic field" is just the shearing component of the di-electric field. go read "Elementary lectures on electric discharges, waves and impulses, and other transients (Steinmetz 1911)" the "magnetics" is just a change/difference/shear in the electric field moving at the speed of light.
Hello I've been doing research into Nikola Tesla's old work. The way that you describe the field as being static. Could this be what Tesla was meaning when you described a method of transmitting energy using a non hertzian wave?
they allready are in series. one winding ends in the middle and is connected to the other winding on the outside. the multiple coils are also connected this way. So the wire always turns the same direction.
@@MasterIvo friend I admire the work that enhances, a cordial greeting. My concern is the following: if you used a neodymium magnet to test the magnetic field through attraction or repulsion, do you think it would have a different result or would it be the same?
What yoiu said aboit the cylinder centre i saw a guy turn tube into xoil wiyh thin metal alway yhrough tube in centre with wite attached boyh end and attached to smaller external coil ... paper particles were being propelled throiuhh centre
It's not strange that nothing is happening, they're getting hot because your system has a fault in it. They should not warm up at all if working with the correct kind of power. Have you tried using a natural dielectric power, like the RF that Tesla's oscillators make? I'm not talking about AC, which is just reversing DC, i mean circular RF power. (DC is horribly inefficient power, and experiences more EMR, as it's like trying to force water through a tube instead of sending waves through it.)
+CosmoGenesis Project can you tell me what circular RF power is? radio frequency Pulsed dc has worked good for me. I am now trying to work with Back emf impulse currents.(with high voltage spikes)
Hmm, that's hard to say. What i mean is like natural electromagnetism, what nature produces, the coaxial circuit with transverse helical precession and longitudinal scalar oscillations. I'm not much of an engineer, at least not yet, so i'm not the best at practical applications, but for example Tesla's standing coils and the like generated RF arcing, which could traverse the skin cleanly and safely. iirc, the AC power that comes off the transformer is NOT what comes down the transmission lines. I've seen a number of things working with AC and RF separately, and they behave totally differently. Like normal dielectric currents tend to bypass a lot of circuitry and go straight to the end. Like if you have rectifiers or anything and a light bulb or motor on the other end, it'll go through it like it's not even there, and run the light/motor. Even when it comes to wanting to ground things, with an RF ground, you have to have branches underground, when AC or DC you can just drive a straight post down. I'm still tryng to work out if there's a better name for it, all i can think of is coaxial dielectric, because it's analogue sinusoidal signals, not what people are used to working with in modern days with any reasonable amount of power, because the world of RF was taken over by telecommunications and Tesla's power projection was canned. Now a days it's illegal to make too much RF with large scale spark gaps and such because you interfere with telecommunications. Look at it this way, you can strobe a DC current at RF frequencies, but it's not analogue power. You can alternate (reverse) DC at radio frequencies to make AC, but it's not oscillating, it's alternating. Tesla's power was oscillating. Alternating current was used for telegraph and such long before Tesla's work. RF behaves like static electricity (the notion of static electricity might be misconceived to begin with). The "RF" power is clean power, and can run motors and things for much prolonged periods due to not losing energy to heating and undesired vibrations. Just a friendly suggestion from someone who's developing a dielectric-universe type of unified field theory.
Thanks for sharing. I've also seen these diectric resonant sine waves jump over diodes, as if they were not there. Someone once said, its massless. This might be a good clue. it is as if it has no inertia.
It's waves with high scalar component. Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric (LMD). When you have a clean helical EM, it can go right through things with only it's dielectric interactivity taken into account - just as light traverses through all kinds of substances and can only be affected by the dielectric resistance & capacitance of the substance. It's like having your electricity flow cleanly down a hill via least resistance, instead of forcing it to take a particular path down a hill. All i can say for sure is that it's not the same as AC you get from the wall socket, and things require way less power if you run them directly from a Tesla oscillator ("alternator"), because it's running as it's supposed to, instead of losing excess power to heat and vibrations, which is like trying to shove a square bit into a circular hole.
Ah found a word i needed: natural EM with longitudinal orientation is a *_torsion_* phenomenon. For example, considering right hand rule, and the way we have electricity used now, we have the longitudinal oriented perpendicular to the wire because people are constantly thinking of electricity as only transverse. The problem is that if we use only transverse, we have high EMR, making the current lossy and slower (it interacts with the material more), because the oscillations are perpendicular to the current, instead of promoting it in a helical fashion. I'm just remembering how the LMD+TEM test works now.
Can you please answer this question! With the same pancake coil if you power it with All Voltage with little as possible or if possible no amperage... and then Vice versa with All amperage and little to no voltage, which would make for a better/stronger magnetic force ???
All amparage, would give the strongest magnetic field. I pulsed a coil into resonance with back EMF (all voltage) and it did not deviate the compass needle (could be that the magnetic vortex becomes a ring vortex).
in addition, the bifilar coil produces a even stronger magnetic field, from a pulsed current, when it is tuned with the right size parallel capacitor. This also tunes down the resonant frequency.
a ring vortex is a longitudinal wave form. looks like a dolphin blowing air rings under water. a torroid turning in on itself. its a field we cant measure properly (yet). a "normal" magnetic field looks like a water vortex (tornado) .
Master Ivo here is my thoughts. The Faraday Disk, its gains are better with voltage from what I understand, that gives it more spin force, like a flywheel. Also giving more surface area for the pancake coil. The thicker the copper disk the more amperage, the longer the diameter the more voltage you get, This will be DC. Also knowing people melt metal with amperage would make me want to use voltage. In the video I showed you, if I fail at making the same results(cast into disks) bringing the disks together, spin with one wire brush at the center and the other on the outer edge and there is your improvement on the Faraday Disk. So if I fail at that, then just take the copper disks and soldier a pancake coil onto the side, make two, manually power one on the coils making the magnet and then you spin the other copper disk to produce electricity (mostly voltage/longer diameter) and that electricity will be powering its pancake coil. And if f everything is flowing the right way (with the spin direction in alignment with the field off the coils) ... shouldn't you be able to remove your manual powered source on the one pancake coil. And they keep each other powered (spinning on same shaft in opposite directions), that's if you have your disks the proper size to achieve the over-unity property?
what happens when you stack multiple bifilar pancake coils on top of one another while running a current through them? Also have you experimented with crystals in your designs? God Bless!
@@MasterIvo On this topic, -firstly thank you for your videos, Do you know ( of a calculation, that tells ) what the iron core size should be, in comparison to the copper coil ( - aswell as what shape - for the best possible outcome ) ?
@@JussiTuukkanen best would be iron surrounding the coil on all sides including the center hole. with DC iron will saturate depending on the current intensity, and the inductance of the coil. The magnetic field is strongest in the center hole of the coil.
Indeed you are right. But I am more surprised by the amount of energy this coil can store, as shown by the enormous voltage rise, due to the increased capacitance of the coil windings.
Ay, it is an interesting bit to explore. I'd be interested in the changes of the Q of the coil's self resonance; mono- vs -bifilar. Also consider the action of a "delay line", which a bifilar coil is, depending upon the phasing of its turns. Interesting stuff happens when delayed reflections are timed to be in phase with the excitation energy at some given point along the circuit. Cool stuff. ;-)
Yes interesting. As far as I understand right now, the q is influeced by the resistance of the wire. So it theory it should be the same for both coils. About the delay line, isn't that always happening with resonant coils?
It seems the capacitance is the same between the windings (as a unifilar coil), but the voltage difference between the windings is much higher, therefor it can store more energy in its dielectric field (more voltage in a capacitor equals more stored energy), resulting in a much higher voltage resonant sine. What interests me, is it looks like a charging capacitor, but its not, because it has no charge time. As soon as the voltage is applied, the dielectric field is there. Instantly.
Yep, DC resistance of the coil will effect Q, but don't forget that the ratio of capacitance to inductance does so significantly. It is difficult to accurately predict (manufacture consistently) RF coils that rely upon the coil's internal distributed capacitance(s) for its resonance; best to minimise that, that's why the PI-wound coils we so often encounter, and use external capacitance to peak the circuit. That gives us more control over the resonant frequency, the Q, and so harmonic responses.
Yeah I watched another video of yours and it's interesting one of the coils you showed was an air coiled I built the generator with an air coil several of them and magnets and I'm able to produce AC power to power my house. When you were playing around with the magnets were you getting DC voltage or ac voltage I'm pretty sure you can get both let me know
@@MasterIvo that's awesome I built a couple of years ago and I ended up jumping into something a little different with the magnets creating power that way I enjoyed it it's fun I'm sure you know this you're doing a great job with these videos keep up the good work
Yes I have, but not all. I'm really interested in Ernst Alexanderson his work, but haven't found much yet. (he was his apprentice). If you have suggestions, I would love to hear it. (he designed the RCA Bolinas antenna array, that worked in longitudinal mode).
Ok, can upgrade this video to show long screw that screw series of pancake, which the windings is equal to hollow coil, so can divide edge which two pancake touch, so edge to divide one winding to show how many wires as a loop to equal one edge, so that means you can add all different edges to equal hollow coil, so have both hollow coils to see if repel or attract. And two series of pancake coil to show repel and attract. So, that would be good teaching, and base on notebook you show null point is connected to one winding, but separate null points at bottom and top winding, but not thru as it interacts, so it is a null column. Which null point to depend on mass as a sphere that matches parallel to the sphere of null point, Well, it can be square mass, but it will be sphere null because everything curve, which there is no straight line in parallel to the edge of mass, so it curves up. The edge is not smooth as it is not even radius unless the even radius is bigger than diameter of mass. So, I am not sure, but the point of how null point is shaped?? As a square, circle, etc, but the basic as one whole it is a sphere. Base on other videos about magnet and ferro cell to connect to your video, so, the mass and energy are interlinked, so the bigger gap of space, the bigger gap of a dielectricity field which it is an energy that does not accept mass, so it is a primary repel. It is connected to secondary repel and secondary attract, so primary and secondary work together, so it depends on secondary and secondary is depend on primary, so it is about conserved of interlink which connects to conserve of balance and conserve of mass / mass energy. So, you show high depth of windings, but you don't say high depth of null point which it is a column, well, it is not because of it can't be connect to how many depth of windings, but connect to hollow of edge windings, which you show for pancake that is depth windings, not edge windings, which depth windings is better since it produces null center that is primary repel at different space of N and S, Back and Front. You mention top null and bottom null, but there is a gap, so above the gap is air, so below the top gap is another windings, which it has smaller gap that is half a radius of a diameter of two edges of windings, so the smaller mass between, the stronger null point will be. So, it is balanced to mass. The mass of vertical is a gap so it is a non-mass to horizontal mass that is small mass with a gap in between, so if it is thicker so the gap of space is equal to the gap of mass, so the null point will be bigger. So, the null point does depend between two mass and diameter of mass itself which half of the diameter is a radius at the center of two edges of mass that is wiring. So, keep doing more experience and make it thicker, wider as a sheep, and thicker as a whole so a bigger diameter sphere as a wire with gap to non-gap as a space. It would be good teaching how the null center is created. It is good to connect to understanding of magnet because copper is flexible and is a carrier of volt, so it is easy, so it gives higher understanding to magnet since magnet as a wiring is harder because orientation of mass to adjust that justify as magnet is higher work so it is all smooth, but copper is easier work with?? Can let us know as a pin so you saw the idea and will update the video.
To be clear base on above, so null center do depend by revolving magnet field which it is within one plane that is center of two mass, as one plane, which next plane is the second one at horizontal level, which the depth level is vertical, so the width level is horizontal, so it curves from null point of vertical level to horizontal level, so there is next null point, so but that null point is too small, so it has no barrier between to create null point, so the null point of edge of vertical level is higher than horizontal level which the barrier is too wide, so the diameter of space is wider than diameter of mass. So, horizontal and vertical are not in balance so no null point as interact which is null column curves. So, but for one plane, which I explain one plane for vertical which has null point, but another plane for horizontal, so it doesn't balance two planes, as 2D. So, but one plane as one cd that is a series of null point that add up to most center which the null pint is bigger which center null point diameter is smaller than series diameter of additive from the same plane for horizontal that is edge to edge, within two edge, there is a series of null point to add up to bigger than diameter of center, so diameter of center is strong. And half of the radius of center is smaller than mass diameter as a whole, in series diameter of mass, that is wiring to next wiring. Magnet field is in parallel to mass shape but it is in 360 degrees. Perhaps magnet field is the same shape as mass, but the dielectricity field is a different and constant circle?
dielectric field is concentrated between the 2 windings (due to voltage difference. Magnetic field, is a volume of Aether, that is swirling around the coil like a water whirlpool (1 on both sides). Set in motion by the transverse movement of the dielectric field (faraday tubes).
@@MasterIvo Ok, you say voltage difference which means what? It is not clear, so you mean voltage difference that is between one winding that is one volt, and another winding that is another volt which it is different, so between that different voltage to equal concentrated dielectric field which it is an add from different of two voltage, which left and right is different not like a mirror, or it means different base on location so it label as different so it is different of position which one winding which it is a volt of one to another winding that is volt of another, but both volts is same, but it is different position, so it equals dielectric field as a concentrated which two different position is an addition to result that is dielectric field like a mirror. So, the dielectric field is a mirror that is not real, but from real, which is visual so non-mirror of two to an equal mirror. So, a mirror that we have doesn't mean we have a real person behind the mirror which means I have a twin for sure, but a mirror shows a twin which is a revolving so light reflects back fully so 180 reflect back to our eye. So, dieletricity field does depend on different of a position of the same voltage so it adds which it is a concentrated, so two will add to one so that one is in a radius of two edges, so it is not 2 which 2 is a difference of 1, so it is more accurate -1 and +1 to equal 0, so 0 is 1, but 1 is real, so 0 is non-real as non-mass, so 1 is mass and 0 is non-mass. Well, both work well, can use - 1 and +1, or 1 and 1, so it is about context. So, two 1's, to equal 2 that is center, which 2 is the radius of two 1's, so like a mirror is concentrated of light that adds to our viewing which is a double since it reflects. So, a mirror adds an equal amount; so do dieletricity field to add as an equal amount. So, concentrated is a context, which a mirror adds, but doesn't add because it reflects back, so it seemingly add, but dielectricy field doesn't depend on reflecting, but add of two to equal 3. So, it is not just number alone, but exactly like a mirror is a reflect 180, so can't be less than 180 or it will not look like a twin back to me as revolving, so 2 is same positions which the same position must be constant so null point is same concentrated, and if want different position, so the higher volt must justify different position of another from the one above. So, equal winding of all windings that is 20 which each one of 20 is same position so the diameter is the same to an equal diameter that is touching to cause equal null point. Or one winding of one diameter and another winding of another diameter that is bigger so the position can be wider so null point will be in equal size, so it is about diameter which is a process as an individual to the result which it is the total. So, process and results are different yet link together. So, a mirror is linked to 180 reflects light, but not link with less or more, or the mirror will look different, not as smooth as 180. So, it is about balance.
In connect to above, so it is all about equal position which the copper itself has equal position at micro level, then there is a gap, which you can see with perspective seeing which it is a line that is a gap, so copper is a series of add of volt which copper itself is a line as a gap which it has different atom to next atom, so then bigger gap. So, what you show winding is same principle in copper that is interlink of atoms to certain volt size, so the next volt size is same at another position, so two same volt size which you can see as copper, so it creates null which you can't see because it is too small but thru ferrocell, you can see null center which the light move around. So, the volt size for the magnet is bigger than copper. So, the null point to depend by secondary which expands to the macro level, which is primary of diameter and diameter to a diameter which both diameters are touching, so the smaller the touching, the null center gets bigger which depends by diameter. So, the gap and non-gap, which is the same, so it equals a null point that creates volt. So, if there is no volt that means there is no null center, well, if there is null center that means there is minimum volt which you can see as light at most micro level which can't get any colder, so the heat is still there, so temperature is connected to mass and energy, so temperature is result of two. Volt as current as heat as light which you can see. So, the temperature is connected to seeing mass which is heat itself. In magnet that is with ferrocell, which the light curve over, which the light is heat as mass-energy, so it curves over, so it doesn't mean the null point is heated but it is cold as empty which it repels light as primary repels, but base on video that I watch which it is clear 'watch?v=rUZsojDdEbE', so the light curves, so there are two curves, which the end of curves interact so it blends, so there are two null points from the magnet that repels. Or opposite for magnet that attracts so the light curve down, so it is only 1/4 curve, for repel, there is 1/2 of the curve, which combines two 1/2 which equals 180 degrees. So, the center of the curve is dieletricity field. So, base what I type above for volt that equal non-volt which it is dielectricity which you can see as non-mass that light does not interact, which light does move thru magnet field. So, there is a balance of magnet field and dielectricity field. The electricity field part is light. So, there is primary attract and primary repel which is connected to secondary attract and secondary repel, which secondary that you can see with a magnet, but primary which you don't see with dieletricity field. So, dieletricity field is a combination of stationary-dynamic electricity and aether that is which I use dielectricity because it is still electricity which we can see, so add di, so it is stationary part, so dielectricity is lowest heat which is pulsing at most lowest heat, which you can see as light. So, it is activated electricity field, so or dielectricity is the pure aether. Or can be three fields that are subdivided of Aether which dielectricity, electricity, and as a carrier for electricity is magnet field, so dielectricity is zero magnet in vertical motion, but in horizontal motion, up and down, on and off, like the light that is on and off. So, there is a diamagnet field. So, for stationary electricity and magnet is using die and di, and for dynamic is not using die and di. So, it is all about aether as stationary and dynamic. So, there are four fields, but really two fields of different levels of activity.
It would increase the inductance at dc, but the material doesn't work on high frequency RF. then MnZn ferrite is the better choice. I added this material to the coil. but the ferrite needs to be pre manufactured to be properly working
there are actually 2 conjugating magnetic field vortices reciprocal to one-another. One is centripetal and the other is centrifugal. Without this, there would be no possibility of a Bloch wall (dielectric plane). argos.vu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Unjjiji.png Here is a top down view i.pinimg.com/originals/ef/04/35/ef04355707d3667ee6fd58269fac5b10.jpg
Yes, I have noticed an increase in well-being when touching the resonant bifilar coil, I think it's related to the strong dielectric field of the resonant bifilar coil.
being near might still work, when more energy is present in the resonant fields of the coil, but there's another concept I'm exploring right now that might be much more powerful, I intend to use Nikola tesla's Radiant Energy in combination with the bifilar coil. this seems to produce a field that is much more potent to your health. I hope to post the results of these test in the coming months.
Master Ivo ua-cam.com/video/9m3IKfQlSEA/v-deo.html Would you look at this video they have a machine that is sold as a radiant energy that promotes health benefits but at a very high cost. I think one could built something similar at much cheaper price. I would be very intrested in seeing your results and what you think about that video and what it could be. lakhvosky had built a electric resonance machine that was said to have even cured cancer. Could you analize the link I shared and maybe provide what you think what or how that machine is constructed? Thank you
Thank you Enrique Cafuentes for sharing that link! I think that is a genuine radiant energy device. when I felt the energy of my coils it also was noticed in the back of my neck, I also do think the ancient Egyptians used this tech. You can see them touch it and hear the electric discharges. Normally this hurts, but Radiant energy is healty. there is a book, by Gerry Vassilatos, called " Secrets of Cold War Technology", there is an link in my latest video (in the description). Chapter 1 of this book gives great detail in how this might work. Im in the process of making a video series about it right now, so stay tuned. the basic of the tech inside that device, is based on disruptive discharging a capacitor in staccato unipolar fashion. the capacitor is charged with dc currrent, and super fast ultra short discharged through a coil. This gives rise to Radiant Energy effects. it appears to seek ground, so the energy is going from his feet to where the guys hands are (in his neck). he provides a ground path for the energy. Very excited to see this video. Such a shame they are not sharing and are trying to get rich from it, while It indeed could be beneficial for all. Stay tuned, I will share all I can find out, on my channel. And yes, this doesn't need to cost very much. It's all about the knowledge behind it.
Hi Ivo,i replicated one of these bifilar pancake coils of yours and did some dc current measurements. My coil resistance (when in series) is 2.4 Ohm (1.2 Ohm each) so when putting about 4V DC on it, it pulls around 1.5A Using a compass like you do, i clearly see there is a magnetic field, but when using my magnetic pole detector (www.ebay.nl/itm/General-Tools-AMY6-Magnetic-Tester-Pole-Detector-Identifier-Magnet-Portable-Tool-/112036818740?hash=item1a15ea2f34:g:-PUAAOSw-4BXbIMO) it only detects a north pole on one side in the middle, so the field is really very weak.Using a Hall sensor i can detect the field, but again it is very weak.I think it is way to weak for you to feel the repulsion or attraction when using 2 of those coils.The hall sensor kind of shows the magnetic field shape, but its hard to draw it here. Itsu
I agree, the field is flat, and therefor appears to be weak. It needs more current to show up more clear. I tried this, and then the repulsion/attraction was more clear. The South pole seems to be weaker from my experiments, so the stronger north shows up.
When you say, 'speed of light', this is just a conception created by science which wants to measure everything. According to Ken Wheeler, and I agree with him, there is no such a thing as speed of light. Light is rate of induction, a coaxial circuit.
Yes I agree, the rate of induction. But thats revering to the rate of magnetic induction. The rate of dielectric induction is even higher, due to it's longitudinal character
"Light can not be anything else but a longitudinal disturbance in the Aether, involving alternate compressions and rarefractions. In other words, light can be nothing else than a sound wave in the Aether" A quote from Nikola Tesla. And The Aether acts incomprehensible. Like a liquid.
its the dielectric inertia plane that drives the dielectric field ( lost of inertia) high dielectric saturation (high pressures) repels magnetism (low pressures). the dielectric represents as voidance into counter space(mass) wich can be visible through a spark gap..
I cant follow your train of thoughts completely. but I do think the Hall effect, works both ways. So a strong dielectric field, will deflect a relative weak magnetic field. The dielectric and magnetic fields, always like to be at 90 degrees relative to each other. So when a magnetic field encounters a strong dielectric field (between the windings) the magnetic field, will tend to be at 90 degrees, not parallel. if it is parallel it will be deflected to 90 degrees. But I'm not sure about this.
Two questions. First, can you validate that this video ua-cam.com/video/rOdTDkgEdAY/v-deo.html is not a fake? Second, could pancake coils used instead produce a better monopole magnets? Also wondering with either coil, would more wraps make the end result better!
thats a great vid David, I've seen it before. I think this might be true. I wonder what happens If both pieces come together. a bifilar (tube or pancake? i think tube is best) coil might do the trick even better yes. more windings is more "plate area" for the dielectric to store. what about using mercury (liquid)!
thanks for sharing Mark S! great insight. now for another "secret": the resonant frequency can be tuned by adding parallel capacitance. this brings the frequency down. if the right parallel capacitance is chosen, there is a larger (maximum) voltage rise. (if the added parallel capacitance is to big, the voltage rise wil be lower in amplitude).
Hi Ivo. I started with testing before few days and its quite interesting. Am using this approach for basic tests. i.pinimg.com/originals/ad/95/9a/ad959a7121dc846f7289ace50cc1cc0d.jpg . Coil is powered with 12/2A adapter and if i put magnet above the coil( some 1 cm above ) , i can feel that the magnet is jumping ( try'ed on both magnet poles ) in 1 second range. My questions are: 1. ) How can i increase magnetic field , do you have some schematics 2.) how can i get one pole magnetic field ( if i can ) 3.) I was planning to limit power consumption input up to 30W Would this be enough to make some serious tests ? Best regards !
1, add more windings, add more voltage/current. 2 series connect the coil from out side rim to outside rim, OR inside rim to inside rim. now both sides of the center hole has tje samr magnetic polarity 3 just limit the current, so the wires of the windings dont melt. pwm, can also be used. Watch out when you turn off the current, it will create a massive inductive spike (impulse) for more info look to my more recent videos
This is what I've always been looking for. Simply incredible work on these coils.
Very interesting!
You are amplifying the di-electric field by aligning the coil horizontally! You could say this coil is the "polar opposite" of a solenoid coil :D
The reason you don't feel either repulsion or attraction between the coils is, like you pointed out yourself, that the two mirrored north and south pole vortices are occupying the same space, which means that the centrifugal and centripetal forces reaching out of each pole (that have their spin direction mirrored between the poles), balance out in the same space so that each of the coils won't be affected by other coherent (north-south aligned) magnetic fields.
But you will still see the compass needle align itself along the magnetic field, because the coil still has coherent magnetic alignment (north-south), and because the needle has its poles separated enough that each pole's magnetic spin vortices can align separately with the coil's.
Basically, any object with magnetic field coherence and with enough distance between it's two poles will be affected, or rather affect itself when near the coil.
Remember you are creating a standing Magnetic field running in both directions in balance to itself hence the two don't repel each other because both are like gyroscopic balanced fields rotating in both directions at once as a standing wave one wave north south the other south north unlike a thyroid wound transformer where the wire is wound crossing the direction of magnetic flow
Check the field with your compass when the two coils are together. Because n and s originate at the center of each coil, the difference in the poles cancel when they are brought together. Thats why solenoid coils are wound vertically.
If you want to try something amazing make a disk with neodymium magnets embedded in it evenly spaced then place two bifilar coils on either side and spin the inner magnet disk.
Doing this would likely disrupt the transmitter capability of our parasitic nanotech that has effectively glommed onto our bio-tissues, and finally allow us to slough it out. Disrupt the field, people! Evict this s#!* once and for all . . .
@@rwhelanable have you done it? im very interested in that
Sounds interesting af
A generator...
I've seen a few now that have gotten into the bifilar pancakes, and you are bang on with it, and understanding the standing wave energy transfer aspect of it! and resonance,
Well done Sir!
Thanks !
Good information, You cannot feel a strong magnetic atraction-repulsion because the magnetic flux density of this coils is small due to the great surface area
Thank you for your demonstration. Very helpful and keep experimenting!
thanks Sonny Skyler. I am.
You remind me of Jim Morrison - riders on the storm! Sing it!
Induced Voltage is what accelerates particles. Seems to me if you set electrical arcs to meet at a 90-degree angle, you can Time Travel.
lol
Fortunately, unlike gravity the magnetic field created in an electromagnet has a 'gas pedal.' For example: on a thin plastic lab table reach under with a magnet placed against the underside surface of the thin plastic table top,, then on top of the table, put a small metal object like a coin (a nickel, say) or something ferrous and small in size. Now under the table move the magnet around -- the object on top of the table will follow the magnet. Now put a 50 pound iron block on the table top and move the magnet around under the table's surface again. The magnetic field is too weak to move the 50lbs iron object. But get a larger electromagnet with a high voltage -- you can then move the 50lb iron object because the magnetic field is stronger. What I'm implying is, I believe if you put higher voltage on your electromagnets the sense of attraction/repulsion will be more noticeable. If you think about it, you could power up those coils with very high voltage to the point of corona that will ionize surrounding air. Somewhere below that voltage level you'll feel the repulsion or attraction between the 2 coils more pronounced.
you'll need to measure the field with the Gauss meter. the explanation to why attraction and repulsion is very weak is because there's a differential between the applied voltage and the radius of the coil . So as the field expands the field velocity or flux ( measured with a Gauss meter ) gets weaker . try measuring the reading difference between the small magnets and large ones. At a frequency, the smaller the SPACE the higher the capacitance just like comparing ultra violet to infrared waves.
indeed
Thank you, This is the best explanation of the paths of the sun and the moon. I know you may not be a FE but you are showing the paths of the sun and moon in perfect harmony. Thanks.
Trace the paths of the eclipses on a flat map, and it makes circles as you are showing.
There is a static magnetic field when you give it dc too.
yes, in fact there is only a static field when there is dc. I found out the compass needle deviated due to the dc pulsed coil (to get the parallel coil resonant).
So a resonant coil, does not have a static magnetic field.
@@MasterIvo so when its in resonance it does have or doesn't have a static magnetic field
@@TravisTellsTruths no. He said he made a mistake. He forgot that he isn't using true AC to run the coil, he is using pulsed DC which will make a field that will not change direction, BUT it IS varying in size and strength. It is not static like a magnet
Hi Ivo, Excellent video and perspective on the field. Thanks for sharing
I think you have shown that there is no North or South poles, that's just terms we use when using two magnets together.
kk
KenKlondike there is a qualitative difference between a North Pole field South Pole field.
If you expose seeds to the south pole of a magnet they will flourish and be healthy many of the seeds will sprout most of them. If you expose the same seeds to a North Pole field you will have far fewer sprouting acidic sick plants. Look up the magnetic blueprint of life Davis.
ua-cam.com/video/Dv4aqgZa7oc/v-deo.html
One side of a magnet represents magnetic field compression and the other side magnetic field expansion.
I guess it's because the mag flux is through the center hole of air, and air cannot hold the coil body (not attached), that might be why the coils don't attract to each other well, if you paste an iron coin to each coil hole, they might then attract to each other and hold the coils together (attached).
good one Apollo D. I think you are right.
So what will we see if turned on and viewed through a ferrell cell?
Bifilar coil geometry aligns with the dielectric plane of inertia, solenoid follows more closely the geometry of the dielectric hyperbaloid, wich for those who don't know, is the causation of the magnetic toroid
Can u buit 2 cube with water and iron filings inside then sandwhich the bifilar to those cubes and smash the on button so we can see the 3d model of magnetic field?
It is unclear in your description if you are talking about a standard pancake coil that would produce a conjoined N/S pole or a bifilar coil which I think would have the fields cancel themselves out. This would be an excellent comparison to demonstrate the difference along with your solenoid. Also try putting a nail in the center of the coils with a washer to demonstrate the respective strength of the fields and the amount of force required to dislodge it.
I use a series connected bifilar coil, that does not cancel the magnetic fields. As described in nikola tesla's patent 512340. a ferrous core would enhance the induction and there for the magnetic field strenght.
Thru my think process and other vide to give me an idea and comment below, well, it shows all ideas that are different is connect to one to new idea and understanding. So, the poles that is smaller together show a magnetic field that is small which it curves over the edge, which it is 180 curve, so that magnetic field is an average of smaller magnet field which it curves over to edge to edge, and the center of edge, the smaller one where windings lines, so the primary is dielectric field where the space is at, the magnet field where is mass is at, so the magnet field is intensity range, so it is not a barrier which all spaces are a dielectric field, so the dependently of mass is depend on magnet field so both are linked. So, the dielectric field is a pressure field in which it is one direction that has seemingly two-pole which it is one pole whole that is forward from the back and back away from forward, which attracts to repel. So, the compass move strongly when the pole is wider because the dielectric field is bigger in space so the center is higher, which each average center of wingings to add up to the whole center, so when you have two mass that meets at center, so it interacts which it is standing mass so the volt increase so that is why it is important to have windings.
So, you didn't use magnet which it is special made so not natural made, so it shows in same way how magnet work, so when combining two knowledge, the easy magnet to harder magnet so you can understand how anything work. So, the turns to space to turns so each turns create an electricity since it depends by impact of dieletricity field which each is north, so all north go forward, and all south go forward, so it curves around the mass thru the magnet field, thru two planes that are vertical 180 and horizontal 180, so it becomes 90 degree, which it is really two 180 squares. so those two 180 meets that create push and pull, but the close pole is too small so the impact of N and S is weak, if further away, the impact of N and S is stronger, but not too far. So, it is about a balance of anything. So, all space is a dielectricity field which it is non-electricity but the source of electricity which two dielectric field that meets which N and S, so it causes interact to create current thru bigger intensity of magnet which two meets. So, two-pole that is closer together creates cancel out magnet field which it is a dynamic magnetic field that expand to contract which two magnet field meets so it cancel out like the impact cause jolt like push a person and the person will be jolt as it move faster in motion base on my push, so the person move faster than the person's alone than apart that don't cancel out which it is a standing magnet field. So, it is not smooth expand, which it can be, but it also can be a jolt, so it depends how fast you push and pull and back and forth in a faster way, so that is what impulse is, so the dielectric expand which like in gravity wheel where the spin is faster so the pressure is higher so it pushes you to wall, like in car. So, it is accelerating. So, when the magnet field collapse it is because another magnet field push it out and if it gets weak, so it gets de-expand by expanding of the weakening magnet field. So, it is about a balance that is a tug of war.
So, the N side is impact field to join another impact, so it is not parallel in motion, but interact which I say join. So, interact might be better in word because I look for impact on opposite of impact, so it says disjoin, so interact is join. The S side is losing impact which it is disjoin so it absorbs to dielectricity field so in macro point of view it is attracts, so it join as it is repeling from macro point of view which the dieletricity field causes impact which it is magnet field so when the dieletricity field impact another dieletricity field so it creases electricity so as current thru magnet so it join so that is impact that is after repel.
To summary above: Dielectricity field, magnet field, electricity field in order as source field that is either repel or attract, so the repel part is disjoined so it absorbs dielectricity field of that mass, so the mass is a geography and orientation of dielectricity field, so it also a space density as a range that is low to high depending on mass itself. So, the attract field is a join so it repels dieletricity field of that mass so well, I did look for opposite word of interact, so it says disjoin, so I use to join, so join do not fit well with interact? So, the impact of two joins, so that interacts which a person says I will join you, it doesn't mean interact, so, the wrong term to use. So, will use the opposite of interact so the interact of two joins creates a current which the current form a magnetic field which magnet field reduces or increase in impact as a range so the dielectricity field expand base on impact. So, there is standing dielectricty, s magnet field, s electricity field, or dynamic dielectricity field, d magnet, etc, so base on above video, you put current, so the dielectricity field expand, even the pole to pole do not expand because it is not horizontal expand, but vertical expand which the space density increase with higher current, so when you put high volt thru separate pole, the repel and attract is higher, so the repel and attract is higher when it is close together.
Even more clear that is dielectricity is an energy field that has direction parallel to mass like you turn magnet it repels or attracts even it is same mass, but the direction does change. Magnet is an intensity field as a range that depends on mass, so it is a carrier when the dielectricity field meets as cancel out of repel and attract so it becomes a standing wave so that standing wave is a current thru the magnet field so magnet field is a bridge, a carrier bridge which the carrier is electrons. Magnet field does depend on the impact which magnet has its own impact within so the current is very low. So, it is all about perspective, but it is all same at a micro level to macro level like fractal pattern. So, mass is a radiant energy mass since it is small to hold the mass itself so interact of opposite dielectricity to become electricity field which it is holding by magnet field and it can be move which if the volt move thru the mass, the result of wire absorbs current is certain, so the magnet is same because the mass does not move unless it is impacted by another opposite mass. So, your cd that is two of them, is exactly the same in wire connect, so one side is same that is one color to another side. So, both side is a revolving like a mirror which forward curve and backward curve from mirror, which it depends by parallel position mass but the opposite side of position mass. So, below to above mass is same as a mirror, so it proves it is all about a different kind of interact of one, which you have two cd that meets, so it creates oppose magnet field so at same time create electricity field. So, it is not from motion alone as a primary but interacts of two opposite. So, if interact of two opposite is constant in position per distance so it is standing field so mass is a standing magnet field. So, the electricity field is the jolt of dieletricity field. So, it creates next level of density like water that is one line in bathtub so when you put finger in it, the water rise, so my finger is a mass that is standing magnet so it interacts with opposite magnet of water so it raises so magnet field expand or collapse depending on mass itself that is para- or other kinds. So, when magnetic field is in motion vertical, so the dielectricity field is in motion horizontal, so it is 90 degree. Or 180 square, well, not 180 square, but 180 cube. So, the volt go down or up depending on magnet collapse to expand in order.
High frequency pulse
Static magnetic field
New Star Trek trailer looks great!
;)
Time to make adjustments to my vimana!
Another excellent video! Cheers!🍺
Thanks, give me an update when you make progress :)
I found this old video that addresses the intereaction (in one small part of the video) of flat magnets. Hope it's useful, if you haven't seen it before. Professor Eric Laithwaite: Motors Big and Small-1971. It's on UA-cam. Cheers-Stewart Caldwell, PhD
thanks for sharing
You said the magnetic field was static maybe if you pulse the coils at a resonant frequency the result might be different, or try a wider center hole to create a bigger vortex
+Jason Mc.Dougall indeed, I did. I made the hole PHI ratio to the windings, and I'm pulsing them with short energetic spikes of energy, creating non magnetic resonance. I've got more videos about this.
In a speculative sense, your resonant coil is magnetized in a standing wave it would seem.
Very cool! Its getting me exited a scalor attacked.lol little joke but it is intence understanding. It remind me of the bifillor galaxy coil i. Created. You will love it.let me repost it on my fb if i can find a pic of it. Bravo well done.
Would you get different results if the coil were deformed into a conical shape? I am imagining that there may be interference between your coils and so I wonder if the airgap created by the conical arrangement would be enough to prevent the interference.
Nikola Tesla was an amazing man 100 yrs ahead of his time.
put a Tesla air coil on top of it and a exciter coil on the outside.
What if your bifilar is in mobius ? Means the the going in coil and the going out coil are not side by side, but are twisted together ?
is the Efield more perpendicular to magnetic field in this coil, or would it be more so with conical coil i wonder. so there is a north pole in center and a diffuse south pole like our PLANEt?
oh heck yeah, you've been at this a long time!
Wish i Had been youtubing earlier in life!
But we are making up for lost time, that's for sure!
yep started in the summer of '16 but learned so much since then
hi Mr. Ivo I know you have been working alot with pancake coils, and I was wondering what would happen to the magnetic field in the center if we add a small piece of iron core; Will the magnetism be concentrated in this small circular area?? What is your guess?
the inductance of the coil would be amplified. So the magnetic field strenght would be stronger.
Iron is good for DC, but not for high frequency AC (resonance), then a MnZn ferrite core would be better.
I would also suggest using an iron or ferrite core, with a hole in the center (like a donut).
thanks for your insights
You have two polarised disks acting as a capacitor, maybe make adipole by putting them together?
Where do you get your cooper from ??
MasterIvo! I am truly enjoying your videos, much to learn and plenty to rewatch! I enjoy your approach and explanation! Thank you!
Question: when you utilize a dielectric material (99.9% Bismuth) to go through the midpoint on the bifilar coil, is there a change in the amount of voltage? I am curious if there would be something like an inverted motor solution which could be leveraged with bifilar coils and dielectric material to simulate the 'Bloch wall' shifting as it does with most permanent magnet motors.
Just fun thoughts, and spreading the knowledge I have happened across in my journeys!
Take care,
thank you MonkGD, I have a piece of bismuth, so I will give it a try. remind me if i forget :)
What is the size of the wire you used?
it was thin, My guess is 0.5mm2. In my latest experiments I use 2.5mm2 for reduced resistance and increased capacitance.
18:05 I think because this is all copper, you won't feel the force. You need some magnetic metal plates on the back of each one, then you would feel it I think.
and more power (current)
I wondered whether the windings are interfering with one another when you put the two coils side by side. Would a bismuth insulator placed between them ptoduce a different effect?
when u got bifilar coil, south magnetic part of the field from upper coil and north part of the bottom coil cancel them self transforming into dielectric flat plane.
I wouldnt say they cancel out. its like attracting magnets, north and south. the field transform into a (new field) dielectric plane. That also is spiraling like the magnetic field, but now not spacial 3d(magnetic), but flat. Still, the spiraling field, also is observable outside the coils, as a high frequency electric field. All fields are ether(light) fields, the configuration of the field is what is makes it dielectric or magnetic
I think they don’t stick together because the magnetic field is not compounded like that of a solenoid
The magnetic field is evenly distributed and not summed
Wystarczy zobaczyć rozkład pola magnetycznego w cewce i wszystko staje się mniej tajemnicze :)
Amazing! 🙏
Two people that have made some good progress in this area are:
Thane Heins RegenX coil and SkyCollection. Search out their video's or email them and you might get some further ideas for progress.
Thanks for the tips
Speed him up tg 1.5. I kept thinking"for what? What's it good for? How powerful is it?" Which he did address, but they're so weak, I can't see any use for them unless Tesla had figured that out.
make them series resonant, and feed them high voltage IMPULSES. that's what tesla did
That unusual magnetic/dielectric field breaks my brain; a lot;
I had the same! still a mystery sometimes
thanks 4 the info
Hello, can you make a tutorial video on how to build an induction cooker from scrach? ( components needed, AC 220V so we can plug it directly to the grid, outer diameter of the coil 40cm, temperature reaching 500°Celsius. Thanks
No I won't. I stick to my research. takes a lot of time and energy to make a video. Take a look at ZVS induction heaters
Nothing strange about your results of the field strength, you have a relatively weak field there to be detected by your hends and fingers but quite strong to easily move the very very light compass needle. Part of that is is that you have a very inefficient magnetic circuit, i.e. that of air and no high permeability magnetic material to concentrate the field.
I also believe that you have a DC comppnent to the current in your coil, which is caused by - and correct me if I'm wrong - the "unipolar" series of rectangular pulses as shown on your oscilloscope screen. It is this that is causing your polarization of the coil which the compass is detecting. You do not show any values on your scope reading such as the peak voltage of your sine wave and the driving square wave.
From memory, your coil resonates at something like 630 kHz, as you are likely aware that the response speed of the compass needle is virtually slower than a snail compared to the resonant frequency of hundreds of kHz or cycles per second so it will respond to the average value same way as it would to a steady DC of the same value. The DC component I mentioned above for a square wave drive, i.e. a wave that has an equal on and off time will have an average DC value of 50% of your peak value. So say you are measuring the voltage of 5V peak, its average will be half of that at 2.5V.
How are you measuring your sine wave? Is the scope probe connected across the diven coil?
Is the scope DC or AC coupled? Give us some values other than just the resonant frequency.
A nice diagram or drawing of your test set up showing how everything is connected would also be of great help to be able to understand your claims.
Yor claim, if I understand you correctly that the N and S poles are occupying the same space is also in error as no matter how thinly you slice things, if you can measure the coil thickness and thickness it has because it is wound of a measurable thickness wire, will have the poles seperated by half this thickness, it just gives you an illusion that they ocupy the same space, and I don't mean this in any negative or insulting way, it's all in your imagination.
I'm 62 and have been in electronics field, including working on RF equipment with tuned resonant circuits from my late teens, I would in no way consider myself an expert in the field, maybe above average to quote Johnny5, but not a master, unless your use of the word master has a different meaning to what I think it means.
Stay inquisitive.
Hope there are not too many typos in this. Tablets aren't easy to type on with my fat fingers.
thanks. I agree mostly but, keep in mind, this video is 2 years old, and I've learned a lot (and shared a lot) since then.
Master is a title given to me by the children I worked with. I also think it's a rather provoking youtube name, and It indicates my belief of the (spiritual) master within, that I want to acknowledge. It also indicates the apprentice within. as both go together as one.
@@MasterIvo : Re the age of video , I realised that after viewing few more and after I had already posted the comment. Hopefully no offence taken as none was intended.
non taken :) hope you liked the other vids
@@MasterIvo: Just out of curiosity, if you have access to an inductance and capacitance meter to measure the total inductance of the coil and then seperate the two bifilar coils in the middle then measure the capacitance between the two coils. I'd be interested if the resonant frequency that you measured in your test (645kHz) matches that of the calculated value of fr = 1/(2*Pi * (Sqrt(LC))). I'd use some lower frequency such as 10 kHz to measure the L & C as using one closer to theresonance point would likely cause errors in measured values.
I did and it doesn't correlate with the calculated frequency. It was a while back but, remember it measured around 50pF. while it should be 150pF. as you said probably due to measurement error. probe itself was 50pF and I used cheap LCR meters.
I now concentrate on impulsing a series resonant bifilar coil. rather interesting effects it gives.
As the wire thickness becomes smaller then North and South poles merge at the limit. A Nouth pole?
a sorth pole?
If you ran a steel rod through the center of the coil, would it become magnetized and take on the character of a regular bar magnet?? Your video has made me wonder about that type of magnet... I've never seen one before like that.
yes I think it would become magnetised.
Since you are an expert in bifilar pancake coils, do you know if this coil outperforms a standard air loop type coil in terms of broader magnetic field range assuming the same oscillator circuit?
no I don't know. It's just different.
Flat magnet is of thickness of the dielectric gap. H Field cancels between the pancakes.
H field does not cancel. windings are series wound, both clockwise.
Both windings are on same plane or the pairs are vertical in 2 wire thick pancake?
Do you subscribe to spherical spinning voids maintained by counterspace rotational input to counteract small aether viscosity? These combine to form faraday dielectric tubes with ends upon a conductor. Void collase create shockwaves. You know this model?
Yes on the same plane, and yes, they pair vertical in a two wire thick speaker wire pancake. Between the windings is the dielectric field concentrated.
I know the model more or less, but for me it seems in complete. I like to think in field vortices, and ring vortex fields.
Scalar waves must be hf hv transients to draw predominantly upon counterspace which acts as a single point "ground" each point drawing from counterspace is considered a zero impedance zero delay songle point ground. There is no space between points in couterspace. It is the power source that tries to maintain intertia and there is no time there in that quantized void. It is a closed manifold held to fixed (in steady state) volume spinning at c. A table is held up by the void interaction. Interia and action reaction are maintained there unless out of steady state.
When tubes between windings on a solenoid leave the coil, the m tubes access cs to form one tube by reconnection in counterspace. They are like wormholes that access rotational energy and small aether sink and sources as a non spacial non temporal void. Without cs angular momentum additions the viscosity would not maintain newtons laws.
Hi, if I have 50meter of wires, and made out of it one bifilar coil, then got another 2 bifilar coils made out of 25meter each and connected the two small ones in series. What will be the difference in inductance between the one big bifilar coil and the two small ones connected in series? or the inductance will be the same?
Amr AbdelWahab I would suggest winding the coils with 5m and 2x 2.5m and test it
Hey Master Ivo. Can you please do a experiment with bipolar magnet for me? i wanna know that if our bipolar coil be connected and its power be in use, It gets hot?
does that mean we could then use this coil to make a motor turn also? or what would happen if you made a stator that would take this type of coil put magnets around like a normal motor and use a speed control would it turn? how powerful would it be or could you then use the induction power for other things also with no load impact? i would like any real opinions before attempting to make such a motor myself.
No cedar rapids fpv racing , to make a motor the magnetic fields would have to alternate to make the motor move. I dont think a pancake coil is suitable for that. the strength of this coil lies in its dielectric field. Ive seen these coils used to make a magnet turn, but i dont think they are ideal for that
it looked to me what i saw was the compass pointed only one way when you turned on the coil. so in theory it could be used to push one way only and it made me think about the magnet wheels i've seen. they never work due to eddy current but the try to use a magnet to do the pushing. i was thinking to use this to do the pushing. would that be possible then? of course also if you make the wheel turn then connect a generator viola.
cedar rapids fpv racing i don't really understand what you are saying.
maybe try it yourself? the easy way is to roll up speaker wire(or any 2 parallel wires) into a disk.
do you know what NT meant by false currents written in this patent?
probably back emf
What happens to the current if an electrical conductor is passed through the Center of one of these coils? Is there a resistance presented or an inductance effect?
I played with some aluminum foil, It messed the signals up, and after tuning again, the aluminium foil got hot. Not really tested any further.
Master Ivo so you’re saying the electrical energy was transformed to heat, and you didn’t measure if any current was present. I guess the magnetic field got the electrons moving. How does one control that? Is it a matter of adjusting voltage? Perhaps pulsed DC? A 555 timer circuit, or a transistor, possibly both, a PWM?
@@gregorykusiak5424 sorry, I'm incorrect. I didn't see on which video you replied.
I thought we were talking about the radiant circuit I posted 19 april 2019
ua-cam.com/video/1Flj1i0zQ-8/v-deo.html
Master Ivo do you have any insight to my original questions?
@@gregorykusiak5424 A conductor in the center would probably cause an inductance effect
Amazing 😍
i've wondered about crystal power... with negative impedance and siemens (impulse, etc...); only with air coils and no magnetic core or iron core... since copper is reluctant and shields the magnetic effect of the coil... and aluminum shielding the electrical or electro part of electromagnetism... what if one wound a(n) helical (air) coil (multilayer, single row... pancake) and placed one on each end of the air coil, as a lid on both sides of the air coil (solenoid, in this case) and shielded the electro (electrical field) of the electromagnetic effect and had a "synthetic" iron core that way to increase the inductance... hence, no iron or physical core at all, only conductors... flux cored? MMF cored; rather... an MMF "flux" core sausage coil (solenoid) and pancaked (a helical, two helicals, or good stack of pancakes (helicals on both end points)) with grannies thick homemade molasses (aluminum)
also, for stability over the permiability of air, in this case, more permeance (right terminology?)... only, with aluminum, shielding out electro of electromagnetism, "synthetic" permiability or however this is tapped into the earths ("vortex") magnetism? nice library of videos and very knowledgeable... oh yeah, and copper electroplated aluminum (foil or mylar foil) sealed/canned around the outside of the whole coil for even more stability and strength/intensity... even wet, cotton coated copper (graphene copper/silver electroplated) wire and possibly introducing steel wire into the winding... even, copper bottom lid/base and aluminum layer between a single pancake (coil as a lid) and the solenoidal air coil... etc... (making poor iron (powder or steel, not ferrite) cores/wire more effective by a low reluctance (copper) vacuum sealed shield or outer layer of the EMI to a higher reluctance source (the coil&/core and its MMF/flux))... a "condensed" EMI coil to match a typical iron/ferrite cored coils performance!
Put iron o each side, then you'll see how it works.
Sir how come sinusoidal alternating current in a coil produce static magnetic field ? Won't it reverse as well ?
yes sinusoidal will give alternating magnetic field. Pulsed DC not
@@MasterIvo OK I got it....
i see a lot of these videos and I'm seeking a starting point. Would the pancake coil be considered as the equator slice of a sphere? Why aren't pancake coils, starship coils, and rodin coil designs combined with tesla coil designs. I have ideas but no real equipment.
Big Bones, yes you can also see it as the middle (bloch wall) of a magnet, or the middle of a toroid (donut). Good question, why isn't this used more? Maybe we first need to understand it better.
With regard to the Hall Effect: There is a little-known invention by Prof. Palmer Craig (1930s) that employed thin films of bismuth sandwiched between flat coils connected in series to exploit a large Hall Effect that appears in a narrow band with weak (terrestrial) magnetic fields. He was able to power radios with it. I suspect that it could be embodied in other forms such as the bifilar coil... www.rexresearch.com/craig/craig.htm
interesting information. but using thin bismuth films isn't easy as it is hard to produce. and it gives only small voltages. fig 2 of the patent in you link seems to show pancake coils with bismuth (capacitor) plates in between. Nodir D has also talked about this setup (without bismuth)
Craig's PhD thesis details the various methods he used to produce Bi films. The best also was easiest: sublimation in vacuo onto mica -- tabletop/garage labwork, no big deal.
The "magnetic field" is just the shearing component of the di-electric field. go read "Elementary lectures on electric discharges, waves and impulses, and other transients (Steinmetz 1911)"
the "magnetics" is just a change/difference/shear in the electric field moving at the speed of light.
great book, but 1914 right?
Hello I've been doing research into Nikola Tesla's old work. The way that you describe the field as being static. Could this be what Tesla was meaning when you described a method of transmitting energy using a non hertzian wave?
I dont think so.
This might clear things up for you... ua-cam.com/video/yk4CJLjNwfQ/v-deo.html
great link FLUX_CAPACITOR also the links below that video. In addition the longitudinal wave is produced when the coil is at resonance.
Can you make them in series like a figure-8 or beyond?
they allready are in series. one winding ends in the middle and is connected to the other winding on the outside. the multiple coils are also connected this way. So the wire always turns the same direction.
Hola amigo es muy interesante tu vídeo la repulsión de la bobina no la probaste con un imán de neodimio para ver qué sucede
hola, gracias, por favor, google translate English
@@MasterIvo friend I admire the work that enhances, a cordial greeting. My concern is the following: if you used a neodymium magnet to test the magnetic field through attraction or repulsion, do you think it would have a different result or would it be the same?
thanks! It will be the same. the field is weak, but it is there
Donation sent to LTC just now.
Thank you
Thanks! I recieved it. Much appreciated.
@@MasterIvo your welcome just wish I could give more
You can See IT If you use small magnetic cubes myby 5x5x5 mm
What yoiu said aboit the cylinder centre i saw a guy turn tube into xoil wiyh thin metal alway yhrough tube in centre with wite attached boyh end and attached to smaller external coil ... paper particles were being propelled throiuhh centre
got a link?
@@MasterIvo I'll have a look
how would i add 38 mhz??
It's not strange that nothing is happening, they're getting hot because your system has a fault in it. They should not warm up at all if working with the correct kind of power. Have you tried using a natural dielectric power, like the RF that Tesla's oscillators make? I'm not talking about AC, which is just reversing DC, i mean circular RF power. (DC is horribly inefficient power, and experiences more EMR, as it's like trying to force water through a tube instead of sending waves through it.)
+CosmoGenesis Project can you tell me what circular RF power is? radio frequency Pulsed dc has worked good for me. I am now trying to work with Back emf impulse currents.(with high voltage spikes)
Hmm, that's hard to say. What i mean is like natural electromagnetism, what nature produces, the coaxial circuit with transverse helical precession and longitudinal scalar oscillations. I'm not much of an engineer, at least not yet, so i'm not the best at practical applications, but for example Tesla's standing coils and the like generated RF arcing, which could traverse the skin cleanly and safely. iirc, the AC power that comes off the transformer is NOT what comes down the transmission lines.
I've seen a number of things working with AC and RF separately, and they behave totally differently. Like normal dielectric currents tend to bypass a lot of circuitry and go straight to the end. Like if you have rectifiers or anything and a light bulb or motor on the other end, it'll go through it like it's not even there, and run the light/motor.
Even when it comes to wanting to ground things, with an RF ground, you have to have branches underground, when AC or DC you can just drive a straight post down. I'm still tryng to work out if there's a better name for it, all i can think of is coaxial dielectric, because it's analogue sinusoidal signals, not what people are used to working with in modern days with any reasonable amount of power, because the world of RF was taken over by telecommunications and Tesla's power projection was canned.
Now a days it's illegal to make too much RF with large scale spark gaps and such because you interfere with telecommunications.
Look at it this way, you can strobe a DC current at RF frequencies, but it's not analogue power. You can alternate (reverse) DC at radio frequencies to make AC, but it's not oscillating, it's alternating. Tesla's power was oscillating. Alternating current was used for telegraph and such long before Tesla's work. RF behaves like static electricity (the notion of static electricity might be misconceived to begin with). The "RF" power is clean power, and can run motors and things for much prolonged periods due to not losing energy to heating and undesired vibrations.
Just a friendly suggestion from someone who's developing a dielectric-universe type of unified field theory.
Thanks for sharing. I've also seen these diectric resonant sine waves jump over diodes, as if they were not there. Someone once said, its massless. This might be a good clue. it is as if it has no inertia.
It's waves with high scalar component. Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric (LMD). When you have a clean helical EM, it can go right through things with only it's dielectric interactivity taken into account - just as light traverses through all kinds of substances and can only be affected by the dielectric resistance & capacitance of the substance. It's like having your electricity flow cleanly down a hill via least resistance, instead of forcing it to take a particular path down a hill.
All i can say for sure is that it's not the same as AC you get from the wall socket, and things require way less power if you run them directly from a Tesla oscillator ("alternator"), because it's running as it's supposed to, instead of losing excess power to heat and vibrations, which is like trying to shove a square bit into a circular hole.
Ah found a word i needed: natural EM with longitudinal orientation is a *_torsion_* phenomenon. For example, considering right hand rule, and the way we have electricity used now, we have the longitudinal oriented perpendicular to the wire because people are constantly thinking of electricity as only transverse. The problem is that if we use only transverse, we have high EMR, making the current lossy and slower (it interacts with the material more), because the oscillations are perpendicular to the current, instead of promoting it in a helical fashion. I'm just remembering how the LMD+TEM test works now.
Can you please answer this question!
With the same pancake coil if you power it with All Voltage with little as possible or if possible no amperage... and then Vice versa with All amperage and little to no voltage, which would make for a better/stronger magnetic force ???
All amparage, would give the strongest magnetic field. I pulsed a coil into resonance with back EMF (all voltage) and it did not deviate the compass needle (could be that the magnetic vortex becomes a ring vortex).
in addition, the bifilar coil produces a even stronger magnetic field, from a pulsed current, when it is tuned with the right size parallel capacitor. This also tunes down the resonant frequency.
Master Ivo what is a ring vortex ?
a ring vortex is a longitudinal wave form. looks like a dolphin blowing air rings under water. a torroid turning in on itself. its a field we cant measure properly (yet). a "normal" magnetic field looks like a water vortex (tornado) .
Master Ivo here is my thoughts. The Faraday Disk, its gains are better with voltage from what I understand, that gives it more spin force, like a flywheel. Also giving more surface area for the pancake coil. The thicker the copper disk the more amperage, the longer the diameter the more voltage you get,
This will be DC. Also knowing people melt metal with amperage would make me want to use voltage.
In the video I showed you, if I fail at making the same results(cast into disks) bringing the disks together, spin with one wire brush at the center and the other on the outer edge and there is your improvement on the Faraday Disk.
So if I fail at that, then just take the copper disks and soldier a pancake coil onto the side, make two, manually power one on the coils making the magnet and then you spin the other copper disk to produce electricity (mostly voltage/longer diameter) and that electricity will be powering its pancake coil. And if f everything is flowing the right way (with the spin direction in alignment with the field off the coils) ... shouldn't you be able to remove your manual powered source on the one pancake coil. And they keep each other powered (spinning on same shaft in opposite directions), that's if you have your disks the proper size to achieve the over-unity property?
what happens when you stack multiple bifilar pancake coils on top of one another while running a current through them? Also have you experimented with crystals in your designs? God Bless!
never tried. probably draw a lot of current and make strong fields.
crystals? I use diodes and mosfets, those are crystal based technologies
Also I wonder why I can't access the other comments on this video???
I have no idea.
@@MasterIvo it's only on you first 3 uploaded videos. Anyways thanks for your contribution. I'm working hard with your knowledge.
thanks, I turned the comments off and on again, for the first 3 videos. maybe this fixed it for you.
@@MasterIvo edit change. It's ok, thanks for trying. May just be a glitch. Who knows in the land of the tube.
Neither I can’t access.
is it because they were connected to the same power outlet in series? What would happen if you connect them to different ones ?
the power wasn't high enough probably, and its only a small coil, without a iron core
Master Ivo Okay, thank you
@@MasterIvo On this topic, -firstly thank you for your videos, Do you know ( of a calculation, that tells ) what the iron core size should be, in comparison to the copper coil ( - aswell as what shape - for the best possible outcome ) ?
@@JussiTuukkanen best would be iron surrounding the coil on all sides including the center hole. with DC iron will saturate depending on the current intensity, and the inductance of the coil. The magnetic field is strongest in the center hole of the coil.
@@MasterIvo Okay, Great, thank you very much ( i will think about this )
Don't be so "surprised". It is natural that distributed capacitance and inductance in ANY coil will result in a resonance.
Indeed you are right. But I am more surprised by the amount of energy this coil can store, as shown by the enormous voltage rise, due to the increased capacitance of the coil windings.
Ay, it is an interesting bit to explore.
I'd be interested in the changes of the Q of the coil's self resonance; mono- vs -bifilar. Also consider the action of a "delay line", which a bifilar coil is, depending upon the phasing of its turns. Interesting stuff happens when delayed reflections are timed to be in phase with the excitation energy at some given point along the circuit. Cool stuff. ;-)
Yes interesting. As far as I understand right now, the q is influeced by the resistance of the wire. So it theory it should be the same for both coils. About the delay line, isn't that always happening with resonant coils?
It seems the capacitance is the same between the windings (as a unifilar coil), but the voltage difference between the windings is much higher, therefor it can store more energy in its dielectric field (more voltage in a capacitor equals more stored energy), resulting in a much higher voltage resonant sine. What interests me, is it looks like a charging capacitor, but its not, because it has no charge time. As soon as the voltage is applied, the dielectric field is there. Instantly.
Yep, DC resistance of the coil will effect Q, but don't forget that the ratio of capacitance to inductance does so significantly. It is difficult to accurately predict (manufacture consistently) RF coils that rely upon the coil's internal distributed capacitance(s) for its resonance; best to minimise that, that's why the PI-wound coils we so often encounter, and use external capacitance to peak the circuit. That gives us more control over the resonant frequency, the Q, and so harmonic responses.
UA-cam video "How to build a simple ferrocell" to view magnetic field.
Yeah I watched another video of yours and it's interesting one of the coils you showed was an air coiled I built the generator with an air coil several of them and magnets and I'm able to produce AC power to power my house. When you were playing around with the magnets were you getting DC voltage or ac voltage I'm pretty sure you can get both let me know
I never worked with magnets. I use impulsed resonant coils. They are AC but high frequency, So I rectify to DC
@@MasterIvo that's awesome I built a couple of years ago and I ended up jumping into something a little different with the magnets creating power that way I enjoyed it it's fun I'm sure you know this you're doing a great job with these videos keep up the good work
interesting research sir, is it same as what physic scientist call a black hole? tq
thanks, no black hole
Nice video. Have you read some of the work by CP Steinmetz?
Yes I have, but not all. I'm really interested in Ernst Alexanderson his work, but haven't found much yet. (he was his apprentice). If you have suggestions, I would love to hear it. (he designed the RCA Bolinas antenna array, that worked in longitudinal mode).
@@toymaker3474 yes, he is who I meant to refer to tnx for correcting his name
Ok, can upgrade this video to show long screw that screw series of pancake, which the windings is equal to hollow coil, so can divide edge which two pancake touch, so edge to divide one winding to show how many wires as a loop to equal one edge, so that means you can add all different edges to equal hollow coil, so have both hollow coils to see if repel or attract. And two series of pancake coil to show repel and attract.
So, that would be good teaching, and base on notebook you show null point is connected to one winding, but separate null points at bottom and top winding, but not thru as it interacts, so it is a null column. Which null point to depend on mass as a sphere that matches parallel to the sphere of null point, Well, it can be square mass, but it will be sphere null because everything curve, which there is no straight line in parallel to the edge of mass, so it curves up. The edge is not smooth as it is not even radius unless the even radius is bigger than diameter of mass. So, I am not sure, but the point of how null point is shaped?? As a square, circle, etc, but the basic as one whole it is a sphere.
Base on other videos about magnet and ferro cell to connect to your video, so, the mass and energy are interlinked, so the bigger gap of space, the bigger gap of a dielectricity field which it is an energy that does not accept mass, so it is a primary repel. It is connected to secondary repel and secondary attract, so primary and secondary work together, so it depends on secondary and secondary is depend on primary, so it is about conserved of interlink which connects to conserve of balance and conserve of mass / mass energy. So, you show high depth of windings, but you don't say high depth of null point which it is a column, well, it is not because of it can't be connect to how many depth of windings, but connect to hollow of edge windings, which you show for pancake that is depth windings, not edge windings, which depth windings is better since it produces null center that is primary repel at different space of N and S, Back and Front. You mention top null and bottom null, but there is a gap, so above the gap is air, so below the top gap is another windings, which it has smaller gap that is half a radius of a diameter of two edges of windings, so the smaller mass between, the stronger null point will be. So, it is balanced to mass. The mass of vertical is a gap so it is a non-mass to horizontal mass that is small mass with a gap in between, so if it is thicker so the gap of space is equal to the gap of mass, so the null point will be bigger. So, the null point does depend between two mass and diameter of mass itself which half of the diameter is a radius at the center of two edges of mass that is wiring. So, keep doing more experience and make it thicker, wider as a sheep, and thicker as a whole so a bigger diameter sphere as a wire with gap to non-gap as a space.
It would be good teaching how the null center is created. It is good to connect to understanding of magnet because copper is flexible and is a carrier of volt, so it is easy, so it gives higher understanding to magnet since magnet as a wiring is harder because orientation of mass to adjust that justify as magnet is higher work so it is all smooth, but copper is easier work with??
Can let us know as a pin so you saw the idea and will update the video.
To be clear base on above, so null center do depend by revolving magnet field which it is within one plane that is center of two mass, as one plane, which next plane is the second one at horizontal level, which the depth level is vertical, so the width level is horizontal, so it curves from null point of vertical level to horizontal level, so there is next null point, so but that null point is too small, so it has no barrier between to create null point, so the null point of edge of vertical level is higher than horizontal level which the barrier is too wide, so the diameter of space is wider than diameter of mass.
So, horizontal and vertical are not in balance so no null point as interact which is null column curves. So, but for one plane, which I explain one plane for vertical which has null point, but another plane for horizontal, so it doesn't balance two planes, as 2D. So, but one plane as one cd that is a series of null point that add up to most center which the null pint is bigger which center null point diameter is smaller than series diameter of additive from the same plane for horizontal that is edge to edge, within two edge, there is a series of null point to add up to bigger than diameter of center, so diameter of center is strong. And half of the radius of center is smaller than mass diameter as a whole, in series diameter of mass, that is wiring to next wiring. Magnet field is in parallel to mass shape but it is in 360 degrees. Perhaps magnet field is the same shape as mass, but the dielectricity field is a different and constant circle?
dielectric field is concentrated between the 2 windings (due to voltage difference.
Magnetic field, is a volume of Aether, that is swirling around the coil like a water whirlpool (1 on both sides). Set in motion by the transverse movement of the dielectric field (faraday tubes).
@@MasterIvo Ok, you say voltage difference which means what? It is not clear, so you mean voltage difference that is between one winding that is one volt, and another winding that is another volt which it is different, so between that different voltage to equal concentrated dielectric field which it is an add from different of two voltage, which left and right is different not like a mirror, or it means different base on location so it label as different so it is different of position which one winding which it is a volt of one to another winding that is volt of another, but both volts is same, but it is different position, so it equals dielectric field as a concentrated which two different position is an addition to result that is dielectric field like a mirror. So, the dielectric field is a mirror that is not real, but from real, which is visual so non-mirror of two to an equal mirror. So, a mirror that we have doesn't mean we have a real person behind the mirror which means I have a twin for sure, but a mirror shows a twin which is a revolving so light reflects back fully so 180 reflect back to our eye. So, dieletricity field does depend on different of a position of the same voltage so it adds which it is a concentrated, so two will add to one so that one is in a radius of two edges, so it is not 2 which 2 is a difference of 1, so it is more accurate -1 and +1 to equal 0, so 0 is 1, but 1 is real, so 0 is non-real as non-mass, so 1 is mass and 0 is non-mass. Well, both work well, can use - 1 and +1, or 1 and 1, so it is about context. So, two 1's, to equal 2 that is center, which 2 is the radius of two 1's, so like a mirror is concentrated of light that adds to our viewing which is a double since it reflects. So, a mirror adds an equal amount; so do dieletricity field to add as an equal amount. So, concentrated is a context, which a mirror adds, but doesn't add because it reflects back, so it seemingly add, but dielectricy field doesn't depend on reflecting, but add of two to equal 3. So, it is not just number alone, but exactly like a mirror is a reflect 180, so can't be less than 180 or it will not look like a twin back to me as revolving, so 2 is same positions which the same position must be constant so null point is same concentrated, and if want different position, so the higher volt must justify different position of another from the one above. So, equal winding of all windings that is 20 which each one of 20 is same position so the diameter is the same to an equal diameter that is touching to cause equal null point.
Or one winding of one diameter and another winding of another diameter that is bigger so the position can be wider so null point will be in equal size, so it is about diameter which is a process as an individual to the result which it is the total. So, process and results are different yet link together. So, a mirror is linked to 180 reflects light, but not link with less or more, or the mirror will look different, not as smooth as 180. So, it is about balance.
In connect to above, so it is all about equal position which the copper itself has equal position at micro level, then there is a gap, which you can see with perspective seeing which it is a line that is a gap, so copper is a series of add of volt which copper itself is a line as a gap which it has different atom to next atom, so then bigger gap. So, what you show winding is same principle in copper that is interlink of atoms to certain volt size, so the next volt size is same at another position, so two same volt size which you can see as copper, so it creates null which you can't see because it is too small but thru ferrocell, you can see null center which the light move around. So, the volt size for the magnet is bigger than copper.
So, the null point to depend by secondary which expands to the macro level, which is primary of diameter and diameter to a diameter which both diameters are touching, so the smaller the touching, the null center gets bigger which depends by diameter. So, the gap and non-gap, which is the same, so it equals a null point that creates volt. So, if there is no volt that means there is no null center, well, if there is null center that means there is minimum volt which you can see as light at most micro level which can't get any colder, so the heat is still there, so temperature is connected to mass and energy, so temperature is result of two. Volt as current as heat as light which you can see. So, the temperature is connected to seeing mass which is heat itself. In magnet that is with ferrocell, which the light curve over, which the light is heat as mass-energy, so it curves over, so it doesn't mean the null point is heated but it is cold as empty which it repels light as primary repels, but base on video that I watch which it is clear 'watch?v=rUZsojDdEbE', so the light curves, so there are two curves, which the end of curves interact so it blends, so there are two null points from the magnet that repels. Or opposite for magnet that attracts so the light curve down, so it is only 1/4 curve, for repel, there is 1/2 of the curve, which combines two 1/2 which equals 180 degrees. So, the center of the curve is dieletricity field. So, base what I type above for volt that equal non-volt which it is dielectricity which you can see as non-mass that light does not interact, which light does move thru magnet field. So, there is a balance of magnet field and dielectricity field. The electricity field part is light. So, there is primary attract and primary repel which is connected to secondary attract and secondary repel, which secondary that you can see with a magnet, but primary which you don't see with dieletricity field. So, dieletricity field is a combination of stationary-dynamic electricity and aether that is which I use dielectricity because it is still electricity which we can see, so add di, so it is stationary part, so dielectricity is lowest heat which is pulsing at most lowest heat, which you can see as light. So, it is activated electricity field, so or dielectricity is the pure aether. Or can be three fields that are subdivided of Aether which dielectricity, electricity, and as a carrier for electricity is magnet field, so dielectricity is zero magnet in vertical motion, but in horizontal motion, up and down, on and off, like the light that is on and off. So, there is a diamagnet field. So, for stationary electricity and magnet is using die and di, and for dynamic is not using die and di. So, it is all about aether as stationary and dynamic. So, there are four fields, but really two fields of different levels of activity.
Hi Ivo, what will happen if you have an iron rod/nail in between?
With direct current, it will be slightly attracted/magnetised
Master Ivo thus creating a magnetic field.. does it amplify the bifilar magnetic field? is that the principle the fluxliner uses?
Fluxliner?
it a UFO which uses electromagnetic field to travel faster than light. on drawings it appear to be using something similar to the bifilar
It would increase the inductance at dc, but the material doesn't work on high frequency RF. then MnZn ferrite is the better choice. I added this material to the coil. but the ferrite needs to be pre manufactured to be properly working
there are actually 2 conjugating magnetic field vortices reciprocal to one-another. One is centripetal and the other is centrifugal. Without this, there would be no possibility of a Bloch wall (dielectric plane).
argos.vu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Unjjiji.png
Here is a top down view
i.pinimg.com/originals/ef/04/35/ef04355707d3667ee6fd58269fac5b10.jpg
indeed, like Ken Wheeler said. I wonder if the fields also have the possibility to form a pure close looped ringvortex.
Magnetic Field is spread over more space!
@master ivo could this have any health benefits?
Yes, I have noticed an increase in well-being when touching the resonant bifilar coil, I think it's related to the strong dielectric field of the resonant bifilar coil.
Master Ivo Do you think it has an effect of negatively charging you? Is it only when touching it or being near can have the same effect?
being near might still work, when more energy is present in the resonant fields of the coil, but there's another concept I'm exploring right now that might be much more powerful, I intend to use Nikola tesla's Radiant Energy in combination with the bifilar coil. this seems to produce a field that is much more potent to your health. I hope to post the results of these test in the coming months.
Master Ivo ua-cam.com/video/9m3IKfQlSEA/v-deo.html Would you look at this video they have a machine that is sold as a radiant energy that promotes health benefits but at a very high cost. I think one could built something similar at much cheaper price. I would be very intrested in seeing your results and what you think about that video and what it could be. lakhvosky had built a electric resonance machine that was said to have even cured cancer. Could you analize the link I shared and maybe provide what you think what or how that machine is constructed? Thank you
Thank you Enrique Cafuentes for sharing that link! I think that is a genuine radiant energy device.
when I felt the energy of my coils it also was noticed in the back of my neck, I also do think the ancient Egyptians used this tech.
You can see them touch it and hear the electric discharges. Normally this hurts, but Radiant energy is healty.
there is a book, by Gerry Vassilatos, called " Secrets of Cold War Technology", there is an link in my latest video (in the description).
Chapter 1 of this book gives great detail in how this might work. Im in the process of making a video series about it right now, so stay tuned.
the basic of the tech inside that device, is based on disruptive discharging a capacitor in staccato unipolar fashion. the capacitor is charged with dc currrent, and super fast ultra short discharged through a coil. This gives rise to Radiant Energy effects.
it appears to seek ground, so the energy is going from his feet to where the guys hands are (in his neck). he provides a ground path for the energy.
Very excited to see this video. Such a shame they are not sharing and are trying to get rich from it, while It indeed could be beneficial for all.
Stay tuned, I will share all I can find out, on my channel. And yes, this doesn't need to cost very much. It's all about the knowledge behind it.
They will start rotating
and then they will levitate
You do not say how two bifilar wires are connected, series or parallel?
Series, like in the patent 512340
Hi Ivo,i replicated one of these bifilar pancake coils of yours and did some dc current measurements.
My coil resistance (when in series) is 2.4 Ohm (1.2 Ohm each) so when putting about 4V DC on it, it pulls around 1.5A
Using a compass like you do, i clearly see there is a magnetic field, but when using my magnetic pole detector
(www.ebay.nl/itm/General-Tools-AMY6-Magnetic-Tester-Pole-Detector-Identifier-Magnet-Portable-Tool-/112036818740?hash=item1a15ea2f34:g:-PUAAOSw-4BXbIMO)
it only detects a north pole on one side in the middle, so the field is really very weak.Using a Hall sensor i can detect the field, but again it is very weak.I think it is way to weak for you to feel the repulsion or attraction when using 2 of those coils.The hall sensor kind of shows the magnetic field shape, but its hard to draw it here.
Itsu
I agree, the field is flat, and therefor appears to be weak. It needs more current to show up more clear. I tried this, and then the repulsion/attraction was more clear. The South pole seems to be weaker from my experiments, so the stronger north shows up.
When you say, 'speed of light', this is just a conception created by science which wants to measure everything. According to Ken Wheeler, and I agree with him, there is no such a thing as speed of light. Light is rate of induction, a coaxial circuit.
Yes I agree, the rate of induction. But thats revering to the rate of magnetic induction. The rate of dielectric induction is even higher, due to it's longitudinal character
"Light can not be anything else but a longitudinal disturbance in the Aether, involving alternate compressions and rarefractions. In other words, light can be nothing else than a sound wave in the Aether"
A quote from Nikola Tesla.
And The Aether acts incomprehensible. Like a liquid.
invite you to try Marco Rodin coil and math ....
your drawing of the bifilar coil only shows 2 leads
yes, I skipped the center tap (bridge between the windings).
What is the standing wave of nano brain implants ?
I don't really know, but If something is nano sized the resonant frequency must be extremely high, even higher than ultraviolet light.
Hey did you know that this pankace tesla coil can heal people. I think you can modified this to medically help peoples
Yes I know, and I Am doing this. I build a circuit into a chair whereby you can sit on the coil. The video is called "the ascention seat"
So... there's no Bloch Wall zone ?
the bloch wall is there, where the dielectric field is the strongest. it's in between the windings. so the coil itself is the bloch wall.
its the dielectric inertia plane that drives the dielectric field ( lost of inertia) high dielectric saturation (high pressures) repels magnetism (low pressures). the dielectric represents as voidance into counter space(mass) wich can be visible through a spark gap..
can you try putting a magnetic viewing film over the coil , it will interesting to see whats going on
at the center of the coil thanks.
I cant follow your train of thoughts completely.
but I do think the Hall effect, works both ways.
So a strong dielectric field, will deflect a relative weak magnetic field.
The dielectric and magnetic fields, always like to be at 90 degrees relative to each other.
So when a magnetic field encounters a strong dielectric field (between the windings) the magnetic field, will tend to be at 90 degrees, not parallel. if it is parallel it will be deflected to 90 degrees. But I'm not sure about this.
I could do that, but I think the field needs to be strong enough, for the film to work. If it works, I will share the results.
And Put IT on the top
N, S pole = ?
clockwise vs counterclockwise aether rotation
Two questions.
First, can you validate that this video ua-cam.com/video/rOdTDkgEdAY/v-deo.html is not a fake?
Second, could pancake coils used instead produce a better monopole magnets? Also wondering with either coil, would more wraps make the end result better!
thats a great vid David, I've seen it before. I think this might be true. I wonder what happens If both pieces come together. a bifilar (tube or pancake? i think tube is best) coil might do the trick even better yes. more windings is more "plate area" for the dielectric to store. what about using mercury (liquid)!
Master Ivo I wonder if I was to use copper ribbon instead of wire, how much of a difference that would make
David Prock a ribbon has much distance between the windings, the windings need to be close together (like plates of a capacitor). but its worth a try
No more secrets Mark S, sharing is caring
thanks for sharing Mark S! great insight. now for another "secret": the resonant frequency can be tuned by adding parallel capacitance. this brings the frequency down.
if the right parallel capacitance is chosen, there is a larger (maximum) voltage rise. (if the added parallel capacitance is to big, the voltage rise wil be lower in amplitude).
My god! 😵💫
Hi Ivo. I started with testing before few days and its quite interesting. Am using this approach for basic tests. i.pinimg.com/originals/ad/95/9a/ad959a7121dc846f7289ace50cc1cc0d.jpg . Coil is powered with 12/2A adapter and if i put magnet above the coil( some 1 cm above ) , i can feel that the magnet is jumping ( try'ed on both magnet poles ) in 1 second range. My questions are: 1. ) How can i increase magnetic field , do you have some schematics 2.) how can i get one pole magnetic field ( if i can ) 3.) I was planning to limit power consumption input up to 30W Would this be enough to make some serious tests ? Best regards !
1, add more windings, add more voltage/current.
2 series connect the coil from out side rim to outside rim, OR inside rim to inside rim. now both sides of the center hole has tje samr magnetic polarity
3 just limit the current, so the wires of the windings dont melt.
pwm, can also be used.
Watch out when you turn off the current, it will create a massive inductive spike (impulse)
for more info look to my more recent videos