🔴 METAPHYSICS: Secret of Primordial Agnosis vs. Corporeal

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 127

  • @KenT123456XXYYZZ
    @KenT123456XXYYZZ 4 роки тому +4

    I have made multiple purchases based on your recommendations with outstanding results. I have also learned many things from you and cannot take a lens off my D500 (thank you) without dread of an open wound in my camera body. You sir are a phenomenal resource that I cherish.
    I sincerely thank you.
    Kenneth Tucker

  • @charlesgodwin2191
    @charlesgodwin2191 4 роки тому +1

    The nature of the Absolute is to function/serve as a diversified unity (continuum of being) that actualizes as a unified diversity or Uni - verse.

  • @ILoveCiniminis
    @ILoveCiniminis 4 роки тому +5

    More of these metaphysics related videos. Enjoy watching them.
    Stay frosty

  • @poynt100
    @poynt100 4 роки тому +4

    Belief is the enemy of knowing. Came across this phrase many times.
    Also quite amazing is the fact that humans eat the environment, and defecates the environment, meaning that each of us is a donut shaped toroid!

  • @andyjs4629
    @andyjs4629 4 роки тому +1

    I'm certainly trying to solve my 'ignorance' and thank goodness I woke up to see my ignorance in plain sight..... gives me an empty vessel by which I can fill it full of truthful wisdom.... eternally grateful Ken

  • @dremovremen1764
    @dremovremen1764 4 роки тому +8

    Avidya? Maybe that's why Ancient Rus "druids" and medecine men were called "ведуны" (vedun).

  • @rohlininc9975
    @rohlininc9975 4 роки тому +1

    🙏🙏🙏. The image and the projection. Potential and actual. As always Ty Ken.

  • @georgeslater2875
    @georgeslater2875 4 роки тому +5

    True, particle 1/B, forms ring torus. Particle 0/A, pentagram trapped within ring torus. 2/c mirror opposite ring torus. 3/D particle flowing between, spherical torus. 4/E the measurements/energy.....we’ve been intentionally conditioned to the corrupted abc 123. Most don’t know where characters came from or question the numerical sequence, let alone denote the correct frequency/colour or sound/tone. Everything seen, heard, felt, is interference, even with the knowledge of order, I show remorse forgiveness to all those that have been born in to a world where the parents, guardians, family, friends and foes are nonsensical, the schools of remembrance (what religious artefacts/places were formed to do) are corrupted. In my community we were led to believe that if you be and do good you get nailed to a cross, a way to fear the golden ratio, 𝞿 pi relationship of equally balanced growth.

  • @Avishay90
    @Avishay90 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you for sharing Love will win, fear will not - Love fear 💖 than it will never win 🙏

  • @benwillis2064
    @benwillis2064 4 роки тому +3

    Love your videos I learn so much. I learn things I did not know I did not know. (:

  • @paranoiadevil
    @paranoiadevil 4 роки тому +2

    Insightful little discourse, the end of the video had me in tears laughing.
    Thank you for that 🙏

  • @janisgaines5330
    @janisgaines5330 4 роки тому +2

    I appreciate these videos the most!

  • @noelmckinney9559
    @noelmckinney9559 4 роки тому +2

    When the world disappears, the self appears.

  • @nunnoffyubehznass2150
    @nunnoffyubehznass2150 4 роки тому +1

    Time to watch this💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻 I'mma fucking take notes. Thank you Sir.

  • @aaabbb3738
    @aaabbb3738 4 роки тому

    when we sleep in a pitch blackb room . when we dream everything is illuminated by uncreated light we see things without eyes, we hear things without sound we touch things without a body

  • @brandonboulton2776
    @brandonboulton2776 4 роки тому +1

    Always a pleasure, and illuminating. Thanks for dispelling some of my ignorance. One isn't the loneliest number. Who'd a thunk girlfriend.

  • @eboneezeradams1821
    @eboneezeradams1821 4 роки тому +2

    Anything that is has a name and a value. In programming, that is a name value pair. One cannot exist without the other, because if there is a value, a value of what? The what is the is, the name, the name of the property. And a property, is the named attribute, existing only to assign value.

  • @lancelenoir2875
    @lancelenoir2875 4 роки тому +1

    Actually the reason that number starts 1 1 is because Fibonacci only had a pair of rabbits when be started breeding them in the backyard.

  • @Cryptic_Triptych
    @Cryptic_Triptych 4 роки тому +7

    All "numbers" are a fraction in relation to 1.
    Humans do not understand and cannot comprehend "zero" and "infinity".
    "Original sin" was conceived by the religious oligarchs to control humanity. The control mechanisms (LAWS) have only been increasing since that time.
    There is always a struggle between order and chaos. Solve et Coagula.

    • @goethe2447
      @goethe2447 4 роки тому +1

      Can you only count to 1?

    • @Cryptic_Triptych
      @Cryptic_Triptych 4 роки тому

      When everything is magnetism and dielectricity you only need to count to 1, because 1+1=1.
      ua-cam.com/video/0OdJUsIuveE/v-deo.html
      There are only three "numbers" +1, 0, -1

  • @WanagiWakanSkan
    @WanagiWakanSkan 4 роки тому

    One has value like any other number. More similar to your examples, Zero has indefinite qualities. Principle and attribute overlap, but also represent qualities unique from eachother. Illumination and light have both similar and unique qualities. Context shapes the connotation of text.

  • @KaiTakApproach
    @KaiTakApproach 4 роки тому

    Ah yes, the only weakness of Plotinus being that paradox explained in the Parmenides and plagiarized by Russell (who certainly did so knowingly) about the set of all sets and whether it contains itself. I suspect this is a flaw in the eternal debate between the One and the Multiplicity and our inability to perceive both as a recursion of one another.

  • @Shanham617
    @Shanham617 4 роки тому +2

    No your intros are my favorite part lol

  • @GnosisWizard
    @GnosisWizard 4 роки тому +1

    I don't think I've heard that before, consubstantial ignorance... That's a pretty cool way of thinking of the nature of emanation! 1/phi^-3... Such a nice equation.

  • @williamsifton6270
    @williamsifton6270 4 роки тому +2

    Believe..... Creates a society that's easy too control
    Teach a adult in a belief
    You have him only on the weekend
    Teach a child belief
    You have them for LIFE
    WHAT AN IGNORANT WORD!!

  • @JohnSmith-hm2ow
    @JohnSmith-hm2ow 4 роки тому +6

    "Us Humans"😁

  • @adolforosado
    @adolforosado 4 роки тому +1

    Great explanation, I appreciate your teachings.

  • @MultiUroX
    @MultiUroX 4 роки тому +2

    what if it has imaginary atributes? "Stares at quantum mechanics"

    • @jimleane7578
      @jimleane7578 4 роки тому

      Lol. I was thinking "nothingness" , but then it atribute becomes absence of...

    • @aaabbb3738
      @aaabbb3738 4 роки тому

      is lack of atributes an atribute ???

  • @drewsmith185
    @drewsmith185 4 роки тому +2

    Isn’t truly original sin really simply the improper (missing the mark) desire for a type of knowing that is counter to the ultimate perfection of the set apart oneness of all wisdom? Ultimately won’t we all choose to ‘give back’ this wisdom as an acknowledged improper misstep in our movement towards oneness with God and then ultimately be all in all with God?

  • @martinlicht1969
    @martinlicht1969 4 роки тому +1

    best video yet....more on this please...thank you

  • @mrygorndbrkdwn9905
    @mrygorndbrkdwn9905 4 роки тому +4

    I can imaging something with no attributes. Problem is as soon as I try to communicate it to you it immediately gains attributes not because it had them but because I must define it to convey it.

    • @zgo280
      @zgo280 4 роки тому

      What about a term that describes an absence? Like a shadow or a hole.

    • @mrygorndbrkdwn9905
      @mrygorndbrkdwn9905 4 роки тому +1

      zgo280 it’s always given an attribute as soon as you try to describe it to someone else. Even using a/n to describe it denotes that it is singular and separate from something else. Shadows have shape,a vacuum has pressure compared to another atmosphere. A void will have a boundary as soon as you describe it. Limbo is a place between two states. The paradox is as soon as you try to share it, attributes are given. Nothingness can be experienced but not shared.

  • @goldenpeanuts9
    @goldenpeanuts9 4 роки тому

    “Was I accurate succinct logical and intelligent in my analysis of humanity and the answer of course is yes” kw🔥

  • @poncholarpez6233
    @poncholarpez6233 4 роки тому

    I love it how you just dont give a fuck 😂

  • @DroneManMurphy
    @DroneManMurphy 4 роки тому +3

    You are the world’s best… At confusing people!

  • @Chaunton
    @Chaunton 4 роки тому

    Space doesn't have any attributes right? That's the only thing I can think of without attributes.
    Thanks for all your work and especially your vids sharing your work!

  • @yesimaBright
    @yesimaBright 4 роки тому

    The answer is yes... mic drop !!! For the win !!!

  • @cabo7907
    @cabo7907 4 роки тому +1

    The re reentry of so said lem to meet up with orbital modual is minimal

  • @cabo7907
    @cabo7907 4 роки тому +1

    Just started watching. As novice, electro/ magneticism been searching for cause of force lines. Always results. Never actual workings. That said, have watched, video on expanding earth, planets. Very compelling photos of all. Hard proof to me, hard to deny. My question is, that expansion indicates more inertia however more inertia must be powerd by what? Governing force?

  • @blaze1148
    @blaze1148 4 роки тому +2

    ......"screw the pooch" XD.

  • @SufiBear555
    @SufiBear555 4 роки тому

    We are fortunate to incarnate on earth of 50% mind and 50% heart, where involution is possible and the beginning of the path. I'd say the Beyond Beyond God is possibly Zero, where the Beyond God is One. But... what is the Whim? the movement upon the waters?

  • @messylaura
    @messylaura 4 роки тому

    when i watch some of your more intellectual videos i bring a bucket with me so i can pour my brain back into my head

  • @aaabbb3738
    @aaabbb3738 4 роки тому

    all true but one sided view of humanity also true the other side of humanity compassion empathy kindness love sacrifice love of truth ,beauty etc

  • @iyoutome
    @iyoutome 4 роки тому +2

    Question Ken. I don't know how to ask. Not knowing how to properly word it, this is an analogy of what I'm trying to ask. Can the absolute say, Hey Ken, You've been hanging around here in the aether for some time now. Wanna go back for some more? This has to do with no prima causa. To which I agree, but then one has to ask, how did we get here the this time?

    • @blaze1148
      @blaze1148 4 роки тому

      ...I think you need to re-word the question..

    • @iyoutome
      @iyoutome 4 роки тому +1

      @@blaze1148 Who manifested the embodiment? Is it a choice? Is it a lesson? Is it metaphysics and physics training?

  • @harmonic3350
    @harmonic3350 4 роки тому +2

    Could not "original sin" potentially be a metaphor for the amnesic state we arrive into the 3-D realm from our higher origins ("the fall")? Our unfortunate yet intended separation challenge of a dualism by birth, a position which the cultivated figure their way out of to reconvene with origin, spirit. The winners of the game. "Original sin" could be another well intentioned, esoteric, gnostic teaching and that fell victim at the hand of the twisted church controllers of dogma... Food for thought.

    • @blaze1148
      @blaze1148 4 роки тому

      ....interesting.

    • @harmonic3350
      @harmonic3350 4 роки тому +1

      Also, a more accurate definition of "sin" is disconnection from source; operating in ignorance. This original ignorant disconnection is more than plausible, its quite evident.

  • @memovillar
    @memovillar 4 роки тому +3

    What metaphysics books you recommend?
    Regards.

    • @parrotshootist3004
      @parrotshootist3004 4 роки тому +1

      Ken has about 2 youtube videos on that. Don't remember them all that well, they are several months - 1yr old.

  • @danpaulisbitski
    @danpaulisbitski 4 роки тому

    That’s a self refuting question. Imagine something that is essentially is nothing. Lol!

  • @richardclark5148
    @richardclark5148 4 роки тому

    Infinite Consciousness having a three dimensional experience.

  • @aaabbb3738
    @aaabbb3738 4 роки тому

    first cause [ god ] pertaining to a newly created being ie us. god blew the breath of life and we became living souls.... we are created beings, like babies are the new creation of parents

  • @michaelellegard8465
    @michaelellegard8465 4 роки тому

    Wouldn't all 'beliefs' be farcical? To know is to know. To believe is to not know.

  • @goethe2447
    @goethe2447 4 роки тому

    Shankara was a crypto-buddhist.

  • @charlesgodwin2191
    @charlesgodwin2191 4 роки тому

    That which is not that which is has no attributes, nor can it be experienced by that which is. At best it is an empty category that expresses what it is in terms of what it is not, ie. it is not that which is.

  • @chrisemms1492
    @chrisemms1492 4 роки тому +2

    Vacuum

  • @edgewyze7352
    @edgewyze7352 4 роки тому

    111=3 222=6. 333=9
    444=12=3 555=15=6 666=18=9 777=21=3 888=24=6 999=27=9
    3️⃣ 6️⃣ 9️⃣
    The universal constant vibrational algorithm

    • @aaabbb3738
      @aaabbb3738 4 роки тому

      check out ... marco rodin ] for more mind blowing arithmatics

  • @dahdahditditditditditditda7536
    @dahdahditditditditditditda7536 4 роки тому

    Per original sin, what if you partly *are* your parents, aka as in the movie Altered States? Could there be semi permanent entanglement consciousness passed (physically) at birth? Like Blair Brown's character having a prehistoric man's memories. Pretty wild idea, but attaches itself easily to some religious ideas. Just a thought ...

  • @Mx25a
    @Mx25a 4 роки тому

    Thank you a lot for your insight! Just a question: so "The One" is above sensible and inteligible realities, no? And if It is not a cause, so the soul is self-constituted?

  • @davidwaynechoate8059
    @davidwaynechoate8059 4 роки тому

    What is your interpretation of 'process philosophy , or even 'process thinking .' I am not sure if this is just Guy's recycling Plato again , or a recent , and different updated boot - strapped version of Plato's stuff with never tried software. I am beginning to find that people take Plato , make a few new - agey words , and pass it off as a new thing at Flying Saucer conventions

  • @MonkGD
    @MonkGD 4 роки тому

    *All

  • @drewsmith185
    @drewsmith185 4 роки тому +1

    Something that has no attribute - the forgotten thought.

    • @drewsmith185
      @drewsmith185 4 роки тому

      Forest Taniguchi I’m not sure - but it was my best stab. What do you think? That’s all I could muster.

  • @goldenbreathwork
    @goldenbreathwork 4 роки тому

    Best book/multimedia source on metaphysics of monism?

  • @armanddoucette8486
    @armanddoucette8486 4 роки тому

    Nous is the mind of the soul which "hopefully" translates through illumination into purity, Theosis or Theoria (action of) then yes, here it comes, into god. The promise for humans through true enlightenment is to become God through grace. Sorry if most of you Christians cannot accept that , but it is the promise. Ontologically joined to source. That is true Christianity which we absolutley do not accept in the west anymore.

  • @georgeyoung2000
    @georgeyoung2000 4 роки тому

    Seriously I'm sincere 100 hours meta

  • @niktesla3939
    @niktesla3939 4 роки тому +1

    Knowing how not to know.

  • @KonNighteye
    @KonNighteye 4 роки тому

    Lol the ending haha

  • @cabo7907
    @cabo7907 4 роки тому

    Seams like catch 22

  • @johmsmith8623
    @johmsmith8623 4 роки тому

    Doesnt space have no attributes or just no propertys?

  • @LUCIOdaMayTricks
    @LUCIOdaMayTricks 4 роки тому

    But what is that extrinsic attribute of the absolute you mentioned?

  • @goethe2447
    @goethe2447 4 роки тому +1

    Plotinus did not understand gnosticism.

  • @m4iled
    @m4iled 4 роки тому +1

    Great vid ty, I’m going to stop commenting now

  • @TheDeanbalkenstein
    @TheDeanbalkenstein 4 роки тому

    the extrinsic attribute of the absolute is being.

  • @eboneezeradams1821
    @eboneezeradams1821 4 роки тому +13

    Original sin....... a ridiculous concept.

    • @eboneezeradams1821
      @eboneezeradams1821 4 роки тому

      @kajestro m. I think the terminology is what is key. Original "sin", as if your new car came with a parking ticket before you even drove it is not only wrong, but a tool used by religions in much the same way for control right out of the womb, i.e. you need us. If anything, original ignorance is more fitting, because whereas the term sin connotes wrongdoing, ignorance is the absence of knowing, and it is up to each what level of ignorance they achieve before another incarnation. Could be one person has achieved enlightenment but still does not know everything there is to know, so they are still ignorant in that respect, or, could be another individual that lives in a trailer and worships a waffle iron, yet they are not so ignorant that they don't know how to plug it in. :-)

    • @goethe2447
      @goethe2447 4 роки тому

      Prove why?

    • @eboneezeradams1821
      @eboneezeradams1821 4 роки тому

      @@goethe2447 Already did. ^^^^

    • @parrotshootist3004
      @parrotshootist3004 4 роки тому

      If 'sin' is to make a mistake (rather than the judgement and condemnation that may well follow that mistake, or the pain it may inflict), and someone comes about selling 'orginal mistakes'; not sure where I was going with that, other than perhaps they have a point. Like partnering with someone too high Narcissistic personal damage (ie Narcissistic Personality Disorder), they can leave you feeling like you have done something wrong constantly, always at fault yet, for nothing.
      However it is for something. Its for accepting them and their BS power games.There is in fact an 'original mistake'.

  • @cipher940
    @cipher940 2 роки тому +1

    Tell me an attribute of Darkness.

  • @davidwaynechoate8059
    @davidwaynechoate8059 4 роки тому +2

    - Terence McKenna :Sacred Plants as Guides :New Dimensions of The Soul , it's two hrs. ,-, and you should watch it all . a few times . But since Terence is also a professional Lecturer , and Story teller , and Philosopher , and Author , with credentials even if that still means anything .
    - it explains in fifty different metaphors metaphysical ideas , terms , and concepts ( terence is working with a pretty crispy bunch of people)
    what counter-space is , or more correct , what it is not . Ken Wheeler
    says loss of inertia , but the brain washing of us causes it to be difficult to hear 'inertia , or loss of correctly , and these incorrectly defined single term definitions are great if you , Like Egg - head Ken - wheeler , or Terence McKenna, use the correct definition it can cause hyper - fast expression , but no one else understands it , though , but a handful of folks. So you become drained from having to say the same thing in a hundred different ways.

  • @DroneManMurphy
    @DroneManMurphy 4 роки тому +3

    John Lovitz! That’s it! I knew you reminded me of some body!!! 😂

  • @JJ-wi2uw
    @JJ-wi2uw 4 роки тому

    Isn't first cause the, "Big Bang"?

  • @cabo7907
    @cabo7907 4 роки тому

    Besides findings

  • @michaelellegard8465
    @michaelellegard8465 4 роки тому

    Interesting. Does the 'Ain' of the Kabbalah have attributes?

  • @ab-wh5tc
    @ab-wh5tc 4 роки тому

    XD. Like no 52!!! No need to edit....yeeeaaahhhh booooooiiiiii. N nice finish

  • @insanebrain213
    @insanebrain213 2 роки тому

    Hey and if you could think of something with zero attributes, there's still the attribute of potentiality right?lol

  • @dougesselman9948
    @dougesselman9948 4 роки тому +2

    O look at me everybody,I'm smart!

  • @pauljenkinson1452
    @pauljenkinson1452 4 роки тому

    Does thought have an attribute?

  • @SuperPotatoskins
    @SuperPotatoskins 4 роки тому +1

    DMT bb attribute that shit lmfao 😂

  • @cebro648
    @cebro648 4 роки тому +2

    So what do you think is the origin of consciousness? Do you believe that a soul exists?

  • @danpaulisbitski
    @danpaulisbitski 4 роки тому

    Fighting over beliefs is irrational and barbaric. Original sin is a concept that I disagree with but sin is not. Light does not cause illumination? Did you say that? What is the source/cause of light?

    • @blaze1148
      @blaze1148 4 роки тому

      ....the source of light is a 'disturbance' in the Aether.....define that as you will.

  • @torenguyette310
    @torenguyette310 4 роки тому

    I love you, you quacky son of a gun lol

  • @zzkjbry
    @zzkjbry 4 роки тому +1

    Space has no attributes :)

    • @zzkjbry
      @zzkjbry 4 роки тому +1

      @@foresttaniguchi3168 you only reference absence.

    • @blaze1148
      @blaze1148 4 роки тому

      @@foresttaniguchi3168
      ....therefore it still has 'attributes' but no properties.....like a shadow.

    • @zzkjbry
      @zzkjbry 4 роки тому

      You are confused mixing something up with nothing :)

    • @zzkjbry
      @zzkjbry 4 роки тому

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empty_set

    • @zzkjbry
      @zzkjbry 4 роки тому

      First you must consider what ken is asking you, by thinking of some thing you already fail to answer. He eludes too the answer in the question "there is nothing that you can think of".
      "The empty set has the following properties:
      Its only subset is the empty set itself:
      The power set of the empty set is the set containing only the empty set:
      Its number of elements (that is, its cardinality) is zero:"
      or zero is as zero does zero
      peace

  • @michaeleashoo
    @michaeleashoo 4 роки тому +1

    why is mankind editing the bible? answer, they started with writings that were not theirs. there is no o in hebrew.
    yes i am s pea king to u

  • @jaradonine3668
    @jaradonine3668 4 роки тому

    🧡

  • @aaabbb3738
    @aaabbb3738 4 роки тому

    .... attributes of darkness ... nothing ness? non existance ?

  • @ETALAL
    @ETALAL 4 роки тому

    Humans 🤪

  • @hemanthharrilall5878
    @hemanthharrilall5878 4 роки тому

    1. What is "Original Source Material".
    2. Have you read the Buddest or any other religious scriptures. You want people to read the Bible?
    3. You seem to know it all with the rest of mankind being ignorant. Huh really!
    4. "You Human Beings", what are you?
    5. In the world of the ignorant, you are the most wise.
    6. Your question, am I wrong? You are not wrong in your cult mantality.
    7. Stick to photography, you may gain some credibility.
    8 The comments below amazes me even more except for a few sensible ones. Quite a following you have there I must say. Interpretation is your key not the key of this vloger.
    9. Educate yourselves to think independently and don't follow like sheep.
    10. Is there a faculty of Metaphysics at any University on Earth? i would like to know.

  • @justsun12
    @justsun12 4 роки тому

    😂