That's why I withheld on the 2020 M1 Macs, knowing how strong those were last year and knowing we'd get stronger chips this year and an extra year to get all software devs on board. Ableton is finally running native M1, Beta version but it's running!
Can you rerun this test with Serum? Serum has a M1 beta as do a much of other instruments now. Keyscape is a real memory hog. Would love to see how 64gogs a ram performs with multiple instances of serum and keyscape.
@@plokitheplok exactly, he's so wrong with this comment. 98% of my plugins, even Waves is M1 native (who usually jumps late to the party, like they did with their interface scaling which they adopted way later than most other plugin brands). Even some DAWs are M1 native already, Bitwig, Reaper, Studio One, FL Studio, etc.
That's a great speced machine seems like it is worth the investment. Thank you for sharing. I have been doing research and might get a Mac with the M1 chip maybe I will just get the air but this new one is very interesting. I currently have a 2014 razor blade and it works well but I've been thinking of getting a Mac again and getting back into logic. Currently I am using ableton for production and ProTools for recording and mixing
The main reason being the efficiency and power of the M1 with low heat and noise. I am also very curious as I'm watching this video now to know how efficient logic would run at a very low sample rate like 32 MS. Because for recording vocals and being able to hear the effects close to zero latency I think this chip might have the power to do so especially with stock logic plug-ins that are actually very good in my opinion
I've got a 16" M1 Max ordered and I cant wait for it to come! Kind of wish I could've got the 14" however I got the 16" M1 Max with 32 gpu cores, 32gb ram and 1tb storage for £2700 on a student site. Wouldve actually cost more to get the 14" even with the student discount I get on apple so hoping the 16" isnt too much to carry around
also would love to know this site! could you try to post with spaces or full stops between the letters? Im a student looking but can't find it that cheap!
You should be able to get 400+ Virtual instrument tracks with the upcoming Mac Pro with 4x as many M1 Max Cores. Maybe half that if it’s a heavy hitter like Diva? … insane
Nice video!! If you double click the cpu in logic at the top it will open a small window to show you per core usage. Further, getting overload messages as you’re quickly turning channels on while playing is very different than if you turned them on and then it hit play. So you’d likely get more mileage from both. Either way the M1 is very tasty! Nice work!!!
Hey Brandon Wells. I just discovered your channel and this very video I wanted to see eventhough I am holding off getting a new macbook . 500+ subscribers and you are going up. I can’t believe how powerful is with the new M1 Max as I am a composer myself. Full support from Malaysia. Cheers 🍻 ❤️🔥
76 tracks to 165 tracks is bananas. This laptop is powerful enough for 99.9% of music producers and if it’s not, you’re going to need to buy some $10,000+ 24-32 core desktop machine.
Pro producers who need a 10k desktop machine, should just wait for the Apple Silicon Mac Pro. It’s expected to have 4x the performance of m1 Max, w/ 40 cores. I doubt any computer under $70k will touch it.
A much better track test count would be to use chords instead of monophonic midi clips; at least four or five note chords. I suggest using u-He's Diva in HQ mode.....my order does'nt arrive until the third week of December. Can't wait to try to crush it with my high cpu hog vst's. ;)
sure! I know it's mostly running through Rosetta at the moment so it's not the cleanest workflow. But I can show how it's handling the Kontakt instruments that I own
Could you see if it can handle real time microphone vsts or logic's pitch correction/autotune in live mic usage (not prerecorded) without any latency at low buffer? All macbooks I have owned had trouble keeping up with the latency or cpu, never had a sweet spot. Thanks for the vid, been waiting for a m1maxxed out logic test.
Sculpture is not a VST but a native apple, optimised Logic plugin. Test real world, with third party plugins that need to go through rosetta. You know, all audio professionals do not use Logic plugins alone.
how did you download Logic Pro on those laptops? When I read the system requirements for Logic Pro it said MacOs 13.5 or later, and both of those laptops were previous versions. I want to get Logic, but I couldn't cuz it said I needed MacOs 13.5 or up. My laptops version is 10.15.7. Anything Im wrong about or Don't know about???
Nice video. I notice you have the apogee duet 2. Any issues on the new mac with it? Also how do you route your re-amping with the kemper you have in the background? I want to get into dolby atmos mixing so looking at the RME Digiface USB and the ferrofish pulse 16.
Yeah it’s quite buggy now, but I’m also on Monterey so maybe it’s a combination of both. I don’t re-amp, the kemper just plugs in to the 2nd channel of my duet.
Ok I see you are using my new logic benchmark test.. I did that one over at gearspace. 165 tracks is insane, will give you that. My imac pro 8 core though, just the base model, gets 160.. cause logic makes extensive use of AVX 512 instructions which is on the Xeons.. so 10 cores vs 8 cores, 165 tracks vs 160.. not so big an improvement now in my eyes.
So basically I can do parallel processing with 4 instances of Bus Force, 1 instance of Mini V, and top down mix/master with a heavy mastering chain without bouncing any audio and I won't get any stupid system overload messages? Tell me it's so? I ask because I am on a 2019 16" RN, and it's a pain having to lose audio quality via bouncing in place or bouncing track in place options in Logic, and I can hear my Mini V losing warm low end that I cannot get back even with a Pultec EQ whenever I bounce the stupid track.
I thought I was being paranoid but word is even Hans Zimmer says he can tell when audio is bounced in Logic Pro before bouncing the whole project, to be able to reduce CPU usage. There IS audio quality loss when BIP-ing or track in place BIP-ing from file ^CommandB or ^B. ^CommandB has less quality loss but takes longer to process the bounce whereas the ^B is faster but so much quality is lost from the synth it's not even funny.
That is incredible. At my level I definitely won't need those amount of tracks and plugins simultaneously, but wtf have apple created 😮 It is so powerful. If next year is good I 'might' upgrade the M1 Great video buddy, thank you for the demo 🤜🏾🤛🏻
Firstly Cheers🌟✨🤛 How about if you expand say 150 tracks plus effects to loop for 8 mins to simulate a electronic tunes length and assuming this plays then leave it looping over a studio sessions worth of time? So its kinder closer to real world session/stress test? 〽️🕶
Interesting test, however you physically swapped the computers around after introducing them, then continually refer to them as "this one" and "this one". Fine if watching super carefully but when testing anything it helps to really *specify* - also verbally - which one is being tested at the time. Also it's a comparison of 16GB DDR4 vs 64 unified (high bandwidth) memory. Also what sample rate and bit depth are the sessions? So many variables to be clarified. And no bussing?
Who cares if the ram is unified or not mr. Smart*ss? you do know that a wav track/recording @ 32bit@192khz (sample rate which most don’t even work with) it takes 768kb/s ram bandwidth per track, that’s not even 1mb worth of bandwidth. DDR4 @ 2133mhz has a bandwidth of 17gb/s. In order to reach 1gb of that bandwidth you need more than 1000 tracks @ 32bit x 192khz playing back simultaneously, what about 17gb? LOL Wether a memory is unified or not, you’ll need more than 17000 tracks @192khz in order to surpass the bandwidth limitation of DDR4 @ 2133mhz. DDR4 @ 3200mhz has a bandwidth of 25gb/s. So your irritation towards “bandwidth variables” is redundant. His approach was more pragmatic and real world related, where one would buy a new laptop, then testing the same stress scenarios on both the new and the old one for a conclusion. Ultimately, the newer one is expected to be faster which is the case here, so your point is? It’s not even like he tested Mac vs PC, otherwise you would have a point, but 2 machines from the same brand? You’re tripping.
@@costinvaly1 thanks for the maths, I was simply pointing out the additional variable in the comparison between two computers being RAM not just CPU. And memory handles more than just audio but congrats if you only run one app at a time.
@@TWEAKER01 I know that the computer handles more than just audio simultaneously, but I stuck to only the scenario relevant to this video which is purely daw stress test. Unless you’re rendering a complex 3D animation in the background, ram bandwidth won’t matter between a MacBook Pro from 2018 (which is still pretty powerful and recent) and the latest M1 variant. So ram bandwidth is a redundant variable between the 2.
@@costinvaly1 What's relevant in this video is audio production real world use. But there's no improvement or significant difference whatsoever between 16GB DDR4 and unified 64GB - in real world high demand use - for a system designed to make use of the RAM available. Right...
awesome video ... I would be interested in what happens when the room temperature is set for summer conditions. in winter everything is fine with my i5 too, but in summer it literally explodes… maybe you could test it in front of a fireplace… & what happens when 2 or more monitors are pluged in? are the fans turning on? also when the macbook is closed? cheers
I don't have a fireplace or two monitors, but the MBP 2018 fan would just stay full blast whether it's solo on my desk, or plugged into my main BenQ monitor.
the test is interesting but not true, because most users also use third-party vts and not just those of logic such as Native, spitfire audio, kontakt, etc .... it would be interesting to make this comparison and not just midi tracks but also audio with automatisms etc ... let's say a real studio job and in my opinion it does not open more than 100 tracks in this way ps thanks for the video
Thank you for the video. I’m curious, how is the fan noise when running heavier projects over a longer period of time? I like the size, just worried it will be close to as bad as with my current intel MacBook.
There is a difference between the laptops. There is not a 15 inch M1 Pro/Max computer, only a 16 Inch. The 16 Inch is bigger therefore it has bigger fans. With bigger fans the computer works better and the fans are quieter. But for most daily tasks, the 14 inch will work just fine. I have the 16 inch since I am a heavy power user.
--** I USE MORE THAN 75 TRACKS ! **-- Hi ! I'm running a music recording studio, and do mainly voices over .wav/.mp3 beats (clients demands). I have a MacBook Pro 2019 15 inches Intel Core i9 8-Core 2,3 GHz, w/ 16go ram, jobbing with an UAD Apollo interface. 3 things I want to highlights : 1) My MacBook Pro make really too much noise after 20 minutes of intense music production/ recording/ mixing. (due to the thickness of these MacBook Pro's generations) 2) I usually have more than 50 tracks w/ effects on in my projects (minimum, because when i mix, I like to create separate tracks to adds différents effects (quicker / more possibilities than write automation, I like to let my main tracks clean, and do modifications on duplicate tracks).) 3) even if it's not about "tracks limitation before overloading", it's becoming severely difficult to navigate true your sessions while 75 tracks is ON, full of effects (w/out reverb), with 5 fx sends on each. It's full of glitch ! Conclusion : I'm more looking for Fluidity in my navigation and mixing / recording process, more than purely performance. I think the M1 max can handle this job easily. Thank-you for your review, Joris
I actually haven’t used it much without being plugged in so far. I run everything on a CalDigit dock station, which also powers it, so I haven’t tested much battery yet
I personally got tired of the 15. I loved it at first, but after a while, it just wasn’t necessary anymore. Im really liking this 14. It’s only technically an inch, but my desk feels more spacious now and fits my camera bag better.
why everyone does the same test, why not try to play +10 vstis with effects with minimal latency and high quality sample rate etc and see if the sound will break or not... for example c'mon....
Remember, these new M1 PRO and MAX chips are built on the M1 technology, so they are the slowest of this type Apple will ever make. The M2 is already coming, the iPhone 13 uses this new tech..
Apple plans several years ahead. There are likely at least 4 models planned faster than the current. Why buy m2 when m6 will be out and m2 will be the slowest they’ve ever produced.
Yes I know that like barely any music plug-in companies are compatible with M1, it’s very annoying. it’s been more than a year now
That's why I withheld on the 2020 M1 Macs, knowing how strong those were last year and knowing we'd get stronger chips this year and an extra year to get all software devs on board. Ableton is finally running native M1, Beta version but it's running!
barely any? I barely have ani non-native M1 plugins left, and i have... still too many plugins.
Can you rerun this test with Serum? Serum has a M1 beta as do a much of other instruments now. Keyscape is a real memory hog. Would love to see how 64gogs a ram performs with multiple instances of serum and keyscape.
@@plokitheplok exactly, he's so wrong with this comment. 98% of my plugins, even Waves is M1 native (who usually jumps late to the party, like they did with their interface scaling which they adopted way later than most other plugin brands). Even some DAWs are M1 native already, Bitwig, Reaper, Studio One, FL Studio, etc.
@BrandonWells How is the compatible with M1 in these days?
The loudest part of my recordings now is the sound of my external disk hard drive. I love this laptop
lol that MB fan has been on every recording of mine up until now
adds white noise post*
mine is arriving in two weeks, cant wait!
That's a great speced machine seems like it is worth the investment. Thank you for sharing. I have been doing research and might get a Mac with the M1 chip maybe I will just get the air but this new one is very interesting. I currently have a 2014 razor blade and it works well but I've been thinking of getting a Mac again and getting back into logic. Currently I am using ableton for production and ProTools for recording and mixing
The main reason being the efficiency and power of the M1 with low heat and noise. I am also very curious as I'm watching this video now to know how efficient logic would run at a very low sample rate like 32 MS. Because for recording vocals and being able to hear the effects close to zero latency I think this chip might have the power to do so especially with stock logic plug-ins that are actually very good in my opinion
Amazing video bro
Dope video man! I enjoyed and subbed 👊🏾💥
You won be over with this video. Subbed. Nice work bro.
I've got a 16" M1 Max ordered and I cant wait for it to come! Kind of wish I could've got the 14" however I got the 16" M1 Max with 32 gpu cores, 32gb ram and 1tb storage for £2700 on a student site. Wouldve actually cost more to get the 14" even with the student discount I get on apple so hoping the 16" isnt too much to carry around
congrats! Happy music making
@maysamopm it won’t let me post it the comment keeps getting removed
also would love to know this site! could you try to post with spaces or full stops between the letters? Im a student looking but can't find it that cheap!
@@georgebloomfieldmusic Ill leave a comment on the most recent upload on your channel that might work? Check and see
@maysamopm Look on the bottom, students. Then you can start buying from there.
You should be able to get 400+ Virtual instrument tracks with the upcoming Mac Pro with 4x as many M1 Max Cores.
Maybe half that if it’s a heavy hitter like Diva? … insane
Nice! Eagerly awaiting mine to arrive next week.
Very helpful! Thanks so much!
Bro my fan is blowing just watching this video.
😂😂😂
Could get a specced out one as refurbished… gotta save up!
Thanks for this. Really digging your channel btw
Very good and honest test.
Nice video!! If you double click the cpu in logic at the top it will open a small window to show you per core usage. Further, getting overload messages as you’re quickly turning channels on while playing is very different than if you turned them on and then it hit play. So you’d likely get more mileage from both. Either way the M1 is very tasty! Nice work!!!
Super useful! Thank you for this!!
Dude, you're clipping your master!
Hey Brandon Wells. I just discovered your channel and this very video I wanted to see eventhough I am holding off getting a new macbook . 500+ subscribers and you are going up. I can’t believe how powerful is with the new M1 Max as I am a composer myself. Full support from Malaysia. Cheers 🍻 ❤️🔥
thanks for the support, jayrin!
@@BrandonWells Oh yes. with please brandon
Now it would be interesting to be able to see the temperatures of the computer!!
Make sure to set your processing thread count to the full 10 in settings!
Love the Video and the vibe overall! Thanks for the review. :))
You got subbed sir 😌
Thanks!
Very usefull video, thank you!
Nice video bro
I wonder how this would look running a full mix
500tracks that’s like film score kind of stuff
76 tracks to 165 tracks is bananas. This laptop is powerful enough for 99.9% of music producers and if it’s not, you’re going to need to buy some $10,000+ 24-32 core desktop machine.
Pro producers who need a 10k desktop machine, should just wait for the Apple Silicon Mac Pro. It’s expected to have 4x the performance of m1 Max, w/ 40 cores. I doubt any computer under $70k will touch it.
@@truthbydesign5146 is it outb
A much better track test count would be to use chords instead of monophonic midi clips; at least four or five note chords. I suggest using u-He's Diva in HQ mode.....my order does'nt arrive until the third week of December. Can't wait to try to crush it with my high cpu hog vst's. ;)
THAT'S INSANE!!! Could you plz do a video test about kontakt on m1 max macbook? I think many people rely on kontakt. Thanks a lot!!
sure! I know it's mostly running through Rosetta at the moment so it's not the cleanest workflow. But I can show how it's handling the Kontakt instruments that I own
@@BrandonWells would be ace! quite curious
Us film score producers have 250+ Kontakt instances going.
damn that's a lot of tracks lol
Could you see if it can handle real time microphone vsts or logic's pitch correction/autotune in live mic usage (not prerecorded) without any latency at low buffer? All macbooks I have owned had trouble keeping up with the latency or cpu, never had a sweet spot. Thanks for the vid, been waiting for a m1maxxed out logic test.
This is a good idea! I’ll add to my list
Sculpture is not a VST but a native apple, optimised Logic plugin. Test real world, with third party plugins that need to go through rosetta. You know, all audio professionals do not use Logic plugins alone.
I got 169 tracks on my M1 pro 10 core with 128 buffer. You might want to get your M1 pro checked out....
I wanna see how many waves plugins it can hold
nice videos 🙏🏻 subbed
What about mixing Dolby atmos? Does it get system overload while using Dolby atmos on the m1 Macbook?
I dont do much mixing, let alone with dolby atmos
Best stress test i ve seen on the new mac.
Awesome vid! How long does the battery last during a session?
Thanks for doing this. Think I'm going to get this same setup. Wonder how it compares with the M1 Pro.
Im sure it’s close!
And yet you probably had your buffer pretty low… so for a mix, you could even run more tracks and plugs
yeah I’m so dumb and forgot to change those settings. nonetheless, impressive performance
how did you download Logic Pro on those laptops? When I read the system requirements for Logic Pro it said MacOs 13.5 or later, and both of those laptops were previous versions. I want to get Logic, but I couldn't cuz it said I needed MacOs 13.5 or up. My laptops version is 10.15.7. Anything Im wrong about or Don't know about???
Nice video. I notice you have the apogee duet 2. Any issues on the new mac with it? Also how do you route your re-amping with the kemper you have in the background? I want to get into dolby atmos mixing so looking at the RME Digiface USB and the ferrofish pulse 16.
Yeah it’s quite buggy now, but I’m also on Monterey so maybe it’s a combination of both. I don’t re-amp, the kemper just plugs in to the 2nd channel of my duet.
nice video but I don't think it tells much about music production capabilities... Nobody uses builtin logic plugins and samplers...
Ok I see you are using my new logic benchmark test.. I did that one over at gearspace. 165 tracks is insane, will give you that. My imac pro 8 core though, just the base model, gets 160.. cause logic makes extensive use of AVX 512 instructions which is on the Xeons.. so 10 cores vs 8 cores, 165 tracks vs 160.. not so big an improvement now in my eyes.
So basically I can do parallel processing with 4 instances of Bus Force, 1 instance of Mini V, and top down mix/master with a heavy mastering chain without bouncing any audio and I won't get any stupid system overload messages? Tell me it's so? I ask because I am on a 2019 16" RN, and it's a pain having to lose audio quality via bouncing in place or bouncing track in place options in Logic, and I can hear my Mini V losing warm low end that I cannot get back even with a Pultec EQ whenever I bounce the stupid track.
I thought I was being paranoid but word is even Hans Zimmer says he can tell when audio is bounced in Logic Pro before bouncing the whole project, to be able to reduce CPU usage. There IS audio quality loss when BIP-ing or track in place BIP-ing from file ^CommandB or ^B. ^CommandB has less quality loss but takes longer to process the bounce whereas the ^B is faster but so much quality is lost from the synth it's not even funny.
That is incredible. At my level I definitely won't need those amount of tracks and plugins simultaneously, but wtf have apple created 😮
It is so powerful. If next year is good I 'might' upgrade the M1
Great video buddy, thank you for the demo 🤜🏾🤛🏻
Thanks for watching! Technology is crazy right lol
Firstly Cheers🌟✨🤛
How about if you expand say 150 tracks plus effects to loop for 8 mins to simulate a electronic tunes length and assuming this plays then leave it looping over a studio sessions worth of time? So its kinder closer to real world session/stress test?
〽️🕶
Interesting test, however you physically swapped the computers around after introducing them, then continually refer to them as "this one" and "this one". Fine if watching super carefully but when testing anything it helps to really *specify* - also verbally - which one is being tested at the time. Also it's a comparison of 16GB DDR4 vs 64 unified (high bandwidth) memory.
Also what sample rate and bit depth are the sessions? So many variables to be clarified. And no bussing?
Who cares if the ram is unified or not mr. Smart*ss? you do know that a wav track/recording @ 32bit@192khz (sample rate which most don’t even work with) it takes 768kb/s ram bandwidth per track, that’s not even 1mb worth of bandwidth. DDR4 @ 2133mhz has a bandwidth of 17gb/s. In order to reach 1gb of that bandwidth you need more than 1000 tracks @ 32bit x 192khz playing back simultaneously, what about 17gb? LOL
Wether a memory is unified or not, you’ll need more than 17000 tracks @192khz in order to surpass the bandwidth limitation of DDR4 @ 2133mhz. DDR4 @ 3200mhz has a bandwidth of 25gb/s. So your irritation towards “bandwidth variables” is redundant. His approach was more pragmatic and real world related, where one would buy a new laptop, then testing the same stress scenarios on both the new and the old one for a conclusion. Ultimately, the newer one is expected to be faster which is the case here, so your point is? It’s not even like he tested Mac vs PC, otherwise you would have a point, but 2 machines from the same brand? You’re tripping.
@@costinvaly1 thanks for the maths, I was simply pointing out the additional variable in the comparison between two computers being RAM not just CPU. And memory handles more than just audio but congrats if you only run one app at a time.
@@TWEAKER01 I know that the computer handles more than just audio simultaneously, but I stuck to only the scenario relevant to this video which is purely daw stress test. Unless you’re rendering a complex 3D animation in the background, ram bandwidth won’t matter between a MacBook Pro from 2018 (which is still pretty powerful and recent) and the latest M1 variant. So ram bandwidth is a redundant variable between the 2.
@@costinvaly1 What's relevant in this video is audio production real world use.
But there's no improvement or significant difference whatsoever between 16GB DDR4 and unified 64GB - in real world high demand use - for a system designed to make use of the RAM available. Right...
That’s crazy
awesome video ... I would be interested in what happens when the room temperature is set for summer conditions. in winter everything is fine with my i5 too, but in summer it literally explodes… maybe you could test it in front of a fireplace… & what happens when 2 or more monitors are pluged in? are the fans turning on? also when the macbook is closed? cheers
I don't have a fireplace or two monitors, but the MBP 2018 fan would just stay full blast whether it's solo on my desk, or plugged into my main BenQ monitor.
what's the buffer size?
the test is interesting but not true, because most users also use third-party vts and not just those of logic such as Native, spitfire audio, kontakt, etc .... it would be interesting to make this comparison and not just midi tracks but also audio with automatisms etc ... let's say a real studio job and in my opinion it does not open more than 100 tracks in this way ps thanks for the video
Do you have a dock you prefer for the m1 max? I'm looking for one that will charge while in music production.
I love my cal digit ts3, have been using it for years now
Insaaaaaaneee!!!!!
buffer side? Sample rate?
wow dude actually showed the specs most people just say the chip they have LMAO
Thank you for the video. I’m curious, how is the fan noise when running heavier projects over a longer period of time? I like the size, just worried it will be close to as bad as with my current intel MacBook.
Been using it for a week now on all my pro workflows with video and audio, and I’ve only heard fans come on when exporting video from Davinci Resolve
Thanks!
Is that the 16 or the 14 inch?
If its the 14 is there a big difference compared to the 15 inch in screen size?
There is a difference between the laptops. There is not a 15 inch M1 Pro/Max computer, only a 16 Inch. The 16 Inch is bigger therefore it has bigger fans. With bigger fans the computer works better and the fans are quieter. But for most daily tasks, the 14 inch will work just fine. I have the 16 inch since I am a heavy power user.
@@aarushanshankar2075 what’s your specs
can you guess how much tracks reaper will handle on thia one hahhaaha.....
What sample rate?
Is that 48khz session?
44.1
--** I USE MORE THAN 75 TRACKS ! **--
Hi ! I'm running a music recording studio, and do mainly voices over .wav/.mp3 beats (clients demands).
I have a MacBook Pro 2019 15 inches Intel Core i9 8-Core 2,3 GHz, w/ 16go ram, jobbing with an UAD Apollo interface.
3 things I want to highlights :
1) My MacBook Pro make really too much noise after 20 minutes of intense music production/ recording/ mixing. (due to the thickness of these MacBook Pro's generations)
2) I usually have more than 50 tracks w/ effects on in my projects (minimum, because when i mix, I like to create separate tracks to adds différents effects (quicker / more possibilities than write automation, I like to let my main tracks clean, and do modifications on duplicate tracks).)
3) even if it's not about "tracks limitation before overloading", it's becoming severely difficult to navigate true your sessions while 75 tracks is ON, full of effects (w/out reverb), with 5 fx sends on each. It's full of glitch !
Conclusion : I'm more looking for Fluidity in my navigation and mixing / recording process, more than purely performance.
I think the M1 max can handle this job easily.
Thank-you for your review,
Joris
Hows the battery life with average usage for you?
I actually haven’t used it much without being plugged in so far. I run everything on a CalDigit dock station, which also powers it, so I haven’t tested much battery yet
how do you feel about the 14 in ch size compared to the 15?
I personally got tired of the 15. I loved it at first, but after a while, it just wasn’t necessary anymore. Im really liking this 14. It’s only technically an inch, but my desk feels more spacious now and fits my camera bag better.
@@BrandonWells yeah makes sense. also that 16 inch feels very very big. thanks :-)
what is even 680% of the CPU???? :O
change processing threads from auto to 8 cores.. without this change your not using all cpu's so your results suck
why everyone does the same test, why not try to play +10 vstis with effects with minimal latency and high quality sample rate etc and see if the sound will break or not... for example c'mon....
Remember, these new M1 PRO and MAX chips are built on the M1 technology, so they are the slowest of this type Apple will ever make. The M2 is already coming, the iPhone 13 uses this new tech..
Apple plans several years ahead. There are likely at least 4 models planned faster than the current. Why buy m2 when m6 will be out and m2 will be the slowest they’ve ever produced.
apple is waste of money build a pc for 3000,- and you can load and play 650+ serums at the same time cpu is at 50%
for what ?? better music is 1 track , an valve radio , or an voice and guitar ,, that is it ... rest is digital toys dead world ,,, no music more
Does anyone know if this will allow me to record with my mic, with auto tune and plugins in real time, with no latency now?
How much rpm m1 fan while recording if it completely silent ??