Considering they're both top comic publishers and are most widely known for superheroes, AND are adapting their major stories to film, comparison is inevitable I fear. However, I do believe it's possible to enjoy both! I'm a Marvel fan all the way (love Spidey) but I've recently gotten into Batman's New 52 run and I love it. Whilst I have my preference, I respect both companies, and can't wait for Batman v Superman!
When I want to watch comical, bright comic book movies, I watch a marvel film. If I want more of a darker gritty superhero movie, I watch dc. I enjoy them for what they are
here's what i think is gonna happen. just before iron man and spidey reveals his identity to the public on stage, cap stops him and there iron man and cap battles it out and spidey finally joins cap's team. that way it won't ruin the spidey reboot with revealing his identity too early.
All I'd want is a a Peter with Earth-1610's new appearance (ultimate). It doens't need to be around that universe,but just his physical teenager-look (or early 20s) was enough.
There's a 5 percent chance the true Spider-Man stays dead. And he only died in one universe. So just calm down. Peter will always be the ultimate Spider-Man. Irreplaceable
Zakaria Dalel actually no, he's not it was revealed after the green goblins return from death he admitted that one of the side-effects of the oz formula is immortality , Peter came back but left the mantle of spider-man to miles
One thing they can't do? Spiderman de-masking. How does it get revered? From what I know (I could be wrong, pretty sure it's correct, though) Mephisto is all like "Hey Spiderman, I'll make everyone forget if you never be with Mary Jane and she loses her memory of you guys together." and he takes it. They're not gonna do that in the movie. Spiderman won't be de-masked. Obvious difference.
Making a new Spideman With Miles Morales is about as Dumb as making the new Spiderman Ben Riley, Kane Parker, Spiderman 2099, and Spiderman Noir. Throwing these people in doesn't make sense. They all called themselves a Spiderman at one point. IT WILL NEVER MAKE THEM THE ORIGINAL
Anubhav Kumar I dunno, I think the hyphen is a matter of personal preference. If you want to fuse the two words together, you can, but I guess you're right in that the original/proper spelling used in the comics themselves includes the hyphen. Am I making sense, or am I just babbling like a moron?
Anubhav Kumar Then obviously, this Dan Slott guy is an idiot. (No clue who he is. With my luck, I just insulted the creator of Spidey or something :P )
Thank you Mark for putting this whole Spider man MUST be in civil war nonsense in perspective. I read the book, and the story would play out the same with or without Spiderman. 6 fucking pages!? lol Not too mention, Spiderman hasn't got the same legacy in the movies as he did in the books. It will have little to no impact. Put Black Panther back in civil war and save Spiderman for another movie.
No Miles Morales To me it's the same as putting a white Black Panther Some characters can be changed races. And still be called the same person Kingpin can Beast can Thing can Maybe Johnny Storm cause that's what they are going with Sentry Long shot Colossus is supposed to be I think Russian Like there are people that can switch but having a Compltley new Spiderman thrown in is the same as throwing in 2099 or Cain or Ben Riely
You do realize that miles is a whole new spiderman and peter parker himself passed on the torch. So there no like changing peter parker to a african american/hispanic spiderman.
To bad kick ass 3 will never happen-The comic was actually done with a good story and great ending. Civil War was a good story- marvel needs to make sure they don't screw it up- they need to keep Spiderman as Peter Parker even if it is a younger version of him. The attitude of a young and cocky Spiderman would fit into the marvel Universe Phase 3 story well.
Juan Pablo Cadena Aguilar not according to this- www.kpopstarz.com/articles/179036/20150227/kick-ass-3-update-chloe-grace-moretz-aaron-taylor-johnson.htm Chloe herself says that she probably wouldn't return for KA3 and that the series was dead. She blames pirating for it.
I like Miles Morales but not as a film spiderman. To me the, putting Miles as Spiderman is age really acceptable, like there's nothing wrong with it, but that also doesn't work, because it just shows that they are just doing it to change and try and separate the story from The Amazing Spiderman. Miles Morales shouldn't be introduced as the new Spiderman, as there are other Spiderman iterations that can be put on film. Like my favoutire. The 90's Spiderman, the animated series. Just like Toby was most like the 60s/70s Garfield was most like 2000's/now and they can make another one
I just like Miles costume haha, what do you think of having Superior Spider-Man (for his own movie or just part of one). Or Spider-Man 2099? So many different version. I know I'm the only one in the world that will say this, but I liked the Spidey movies with Toby (yes all 3 were great) and I liked The Amazing Spider-Man and was hoping for a 3rd one because it seemed like at the end of each movie The Gentleman was gathering members for the Sinister Six. And to end my rant I have one more comment, the Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon is terrible.
Honestly, I hope marvel doesn't use Mark Millar's actual story for Civil War. He is a good concept guy but he usually executes them poorly. His comics are largely about shock value, gratuitous violence and smut.
Yeah, major plot twist for the upcoming Civil War movie - they changed it, so now, it's the Commonwealth nations and not the Avengers fighting each other XD
atleast this movie isn't being made because its predecessor underperformed at the box office. *ahem MOS ahem*. Marvel plans things and doesn't make their decisions out of being reactionary.
not even close- Watchmen was a story about Superheroes and how they both use and abuse their powers and the consequences they have to deal with afterwards- Civil War is a war about a Superhero registration act. Meaning everyone wearing a mask and has superpowers had to register with the government or be put into a superhero prison. Ill grant you that Watchmen is a solid comic- A standard classic. But Civil war doesn't hold a candle to it- and I actually am a big fan of marvel comics
ok but how about the dark knight returns? in the second part superman,a superheroe in side with the goverment (like ironman) is used to fight and older superheroe with problems with the goverment which was batman (like captain america), batman beats supes with the help of robin and green arrow (cap beats ironman with the help of vision) and humiliates them, however in the afternath they are both appearently death also, civil war was caused by the bad use of superpowers (the nuke explosion) wich causes the conflict (same as wathcmen)
only half right- in Watchmen the government just tried to outlaw mask wearers. remember the scene where the two night owls talked- Nixon forcing them out? they didn't want any kind of registration act. they just wanted them gone and besides you said Civil War was a Watchmen copy- not the dark knight returns. Civil war is marvel DKR is DC same as Watchmen DKR is another classic comic- in the DC cannon- If I remember right there wasn't any kind of nuke theme in Civil War- just super villains out of control- ironman reluctantly sides with the government and then he builds a super prison that to house the criminals with superpowers and anyone with powers who refused to register themselves with the government. Captain America finds out about this and chooses to fight on the other side. DKR and Watchmen did have the nuke theme in common but the stories were pretty different. Superman was used by Regan to handle international nuke and other crisis across the globe- not necessarily to fight the old superheroes. That was just done because Regan wanted the vigilante thing to stay quite. It was only when Batman refused that the two decide to fight it out. Nixon used Dr. Manhattan in the same way but never asked him to fight any other Superheroes. That is where the two stories differ.
all the civil war stuff was caused by a nuke explosion caused by a group of young heroes, dont remember their name, but it destroy a city, and also in civil war ironman wasnt designed to fight cap either, cap refused (same as batman) to cooperate
Why is Civil War a Captain America movie? (Sigh)... I'm still not watching that shit Marvel, no matter how great you make the war. But hey tell you what get Spidey and your other interesting heroes for Avengers 3 and I'll consider watching that shit to, personaly I don't like Hulk, Iron Man, Captain America, Hawkeye, what's her name that kicks people, and any of those others, Thor is okay, but I much prefer the God over Marvels hero.
I don't hate Marvel I like Spider-Man, Blank Panther and X-Men, I mean that's pretty much it but yeah. I think its mainly because I grew up watching the 90's Spider-Man cartoon, as well as Batman and Superman, then came Justice Leauge Unlimited, and The Batman. Maybe if I read more like Spider Woman (whom I know a tiny bit about) and unknown ones like that I'd like more. I just wish Civil War was its own movie instead of being a Captain America movie. Oh and on my list above I forgot Deadpool, I like him to, but I guess he is Anti-Hero, so I don't really count him for Marvel heroes I like... and I'm ranting sorry.
werewolf914 I was thinking that if they ever made a civil war movie it would be two parts. The first part would be "Captain America Civil War" and the second "Ironman Civil War" so we see the war from both perspectives
It's a movie bro, they have no choice but to show EVERY side. Plus Iron Man is only making guest appearances since his trilogy is over for now. Trust me man, it's gonna be a great movie. Marvel doesn't let down the fans
I bloody love both DC anc Marvel, dont feel a need to compare them, just enjoy them for what they are
Considering they're both top comic publishers and are most widely known for superheroes, AND are adapting their major stories to film, comparison is inevitable I fear. However, I do believe it's possible to enjoy both! I'm a Marvel fan all the way (love Spidey) but I've recently gotten into Batman's New 52 run and I love it. Whilst I have my preference, I respect both companies, and can't wait for Batman v Superman!
FINALLY SOME PEACEFUL COMMENTS
Spread the love, homie.
Agreed. This isn't sports where you only like one team.
When I want to watch comical, bright comic book movies, I watch a marvel film. If I want more of a darker gritty superhero movie, I watch dc. I enjoy them for what they are
SAM JACKSON IS 67? DAMN
Arcilios He's actually 66, but still. I thought he was late 50's, maybe 60 at most.
here's what i think is gonna happen. just before iron man and spidey reveals his identity to the public on stage, cap stops him and there iron man and cap battles it out and spidey finally joins cap's team. that way it won't ruin the spidey reboot with revealing his identity too early.
spidey won't reveal his identity, it would not make sense bc no one knows him in the MCU, there has not been any reference to him yet
Peter " O.G." Parker
06:47 That laugh , it was as if he didn't really get it
i think the more important aspect of the the spiderman ip is that they can finally use agent venom in shield, lol
civil war was an epic series!
All I'd want is a a Peter with Earth-1610's new appearance (ultimate). It doens't need to be around that universe,but just his physical teenager-look (or early 20s) was enough.
"Best selling comic for 20 years".
"Yeah yeah, it's pretty good".
There's a 5 percent chance the true Spider-Man stays dead. And he only died in one universe. So just calm down. Peter will always be the ultimate Spider-Man. Irreplaceable
Well this is awkward, but the ultimate spiderman (parker) is dead
Zakaria Dalel actually no, he's not it was revealed after the green goblins return from death he admitted that one of the side-effects of the oz formula is immortality , Peter came back but left the mantle of spider-man to miles
Have you been reading Ultimate recently? He's alive.
I dont read ultimate so my facts are off 😅
No worries, this was a fairly recent reveal.
Can't wait
Genius in the building.
And by the way, who's Cross Evans?
Dat European-UK/Scottish/Irish accents.
No one was Irish there, only Welsh, English and Scottish
sorta sounded Irish.
Well scrertw you dude
I thought that "scrertw" would be Irish
WELSH!!!
Sounds gay
One thing they can't do? Spiderman de-masking. How does it get revered? From what I know (I could be wrong, pretty sure it's correct, though) Mephisto is all like "Hey Spiderman, I'll make everyone forget if you never be with Mary Jane and she loses her memory of you guys together." and he takes it. They're not gonna do that in the movie.
Spiderman won't be de-masked. Obvious difference.
@werewolf914
Yes exactly man. Exactly
I like miles suit too
I just don't want them to change Spiderman for the sake of Changing spiderman
Making a new Spideman With Miles Morales is about as Dumb as making the new Spiderman Ben Riley, Kane Parker, Spiderman 2099, and Spiderman Noir.
Throwing these people in doesn't make sense. They all called themselves a Spiderman at one point. IT WILL NEVER MAKE THEM THE ORIGINAL
Writing Spider-Man without the hyphen, and you call yourself a Spidey fan.
Anubhav Kumar I dunno, I think the hyphen is a matter of personal preference. If you want to fuse the two words together, you can, but I guess you're right in that the original/proper spelling used in the comics themselves includes the hyphen. Am I making sense, or am I just babbling like a moron?
Mattias Westby Dan Slott got angry at people on twitter for writing Spiderman instead of Spider-Man
Anubhav Kumar Then obviously, this Dan Slott guy is an idiot. (No clue who he is. With my luck, I just insulted the creator of Spidey or something :P )
Mattias Westby He's the current writer of Spider-Man =P
I like this guy.
I really don't care. I just want to see Spidey 😊. Who cares about the comics? Or the story line? I just want Spidey. 👌
Yay! Miles Morales is joining the MCU!
No.
chase whichard YES!!
He's not. Marvel confirmed it's Peter Parker
Michael McKenzie
Really? Thank god.
Thank you Mark for putting this whole Spider man MUST be in civil war nonsense in perspective. I read the book, and the story would play out the same with or without Spiderman. 6 fucking pages!? lol Not too mention, Spiderman hasn't got the same legacy in the movies as he did in the books. It will have little to no impact. Put Black Panther back in civil war and save Spiderman for another movie.
66..."black don't crack" ;)
No Miles Morales
To me it's the same as putting a white Black Panther
Some characters can be changed races. And still be called the same person
Kingpin can
Beast can
Thing can
Maybe Johnny Storm cause that's what they are going with
Sentry
Long shot
Colossus is supposed to be I think Russian
Like there are people that can switch but having a Compltley new Spiderman thrown in is the same as throwing in 2099 or Cain or Ben Riely
You do realize that miles is a whole new spiderman and peter parker himself passed on the torch. So there no like changing peter parker to a african american/hispanic spiderman.
To bad kick ass 3 will never happen-The comic was actually done with a good story and great ending. Civil War was a good story- marvel needs to make sure they don't screw it up- they need to keep Spiderman as Peter Parker even if it is a younger version of him. The attitude of a young and cocky Spiderman would fit into the marvel Universe Phase 3 story well.
IT'S ACTUALLY HAPPENING, also the Hit-Girl prequel
Juan Pablo Cadena Aguilar not according to this- www.kpopstarz.com/articles/179036/20150227/kick-ass-3-update-chloe-grace-moretz-aaron-taylor-johnson.htm Chloe herself says that she probably wouldn't return for KA3 and that the series was dead. She blames pirating for it.
Sexty seven :') accent is amazing...
I like Miles Morales but not as a film spiderman. To me the, putting Miles as Spiderman is age really acceptable, like there's nothing wrong with it, but that also doesn't work, because it just shows that they are just doing it to change and try and separate the story from The Amazing Spiderman. Miles Morales shouldn't be introduced as the new Spiderman, as there are other Spiderman iterations that can be put on film. Like my favoutire. The 90's Spiderman, the animated series. Just like Toby was most like the 60s/70s Garfield was most like 2000's/now and they can make another one
I just like Miles costume haha, what do you think of having Superior Spider-Man (for his own movie or just part of one). Or Spider-Man 2099? So many different version. I know I'm the only one in the world that will say this, but I liked the Spidey movies with Toby (yes all 3 were great) and I liked The Amazing Spider-Man and was hoping for a 3rd one because it seemed like at the end of each movie The Gentleman was gathering members for the Sinister Six. And to end my rant I have one more comment, the Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon is terrible.
Honestly, I hope marvel doesn't use Mark Millar's actual story for Civil War. He is a good concept guy but he usually executes them poorly. His comics are largely about shock value, gratuitous violence and smut.
Wow, so Mark Millar is British. I guess I had the wrong assumptions...
For some reason, the dude with the beard always bothers me when he's on a video. I just have to bail
Scottish accent, british accent, and australian accent... what even
Yeah, major plot twist for the upcoming Civil War movie - they changed it, so now, it's the Commonwealth nations and not the Avengers fighting each other XD
HAIL HYDRA!!!!!
HAIL HYDRA
I think we should find an ultimatum, guys!
For the beyonders sake, do not mention the awfuk story arc
HAIL HYDRA!!!!!
If Miles Morales is Spider-Man then I will officially boycott this movie
WELSH ACCENT
Omg
Am I the first comment
Who cares
rekt
No one dose that's the whole point in this comment I'm just doing what everyone else dose it's called rehashing everyone is doing it and so should you
"Everyone else is doing it and so should you"
lolwat
atleast this movie isn't being made because its predecessor underperformed at the box office. *ahem MOS ahem*. Marvel plans things and doesn't make their decisions out of being reactionary.
Watchmen copy
not even close- Watchmen was a story about Superheroes and how they both use and abuse their powers and the consequences they have to deal with afterwards-
Civil War is a war about a Superhero registration act. Meaning everyone wearing a mask and has superpowers had to register with the government or be put into a superhero prison.
Ill grant you that Watchmen is a solid comic- A standard classic. But Civil war doesn't hold a candle to it- and I actually am a big fan of marvel comics
ok but how about the dark knight returns? in the second part superman,a superheroe in side with the goverment (like ironman) is used to fight and older superheroe with problems with the goverment which was batman (like captain america), batman beats supes with the help of robin and green arrow (cap beats ironman with the help of vision) and humiliates them, however in the afternath they are both appearently death
also, civil war was caused by the bad use of superpowers (the nuke explosion) wich causes the conflict (same as wathcmen)
only half right- in Watchmen the government just tried to outlaw mask wearers. remember the scene where the two night owls talked- Nixon forcing them out? they didn't want any kind of registration act. they just wanted them gone and besides you said Civil War was a Watchmen copy- not the dark knight returns. Civil war is marvel DKR is DC same as Watchmen DKR is another classic comic- in the DC cannon- If I remember right there wasn't any kind of nuke theme in Civil War- just super villains out of control- ironman reluctantly sides with the government and then he builds a super prison that to house the criminals with superpowers and anyone with powers who refused to register themselves with the government. Captain America finds out about this and chooses to fight on the other side.
DKR and Watchmen did have the nuke theme in common but the stories were pretty different. Superman was used by Regan to handle international nuke and other crisis across the globe- not necessarily to fight the old superheroes. That was just done because Regan wanted the vigilante thing to stay quite. It was only when Batman refused that the two decide to fight it out.
Nixon used Dr. Manhattan in the same way but never asked him to fight any other Superheroes. That is where the two stories differ.
all the civil war stuff was caused by a nuke explosion caused by a group of young heroes, dont remember their name, but it destroy a city, and also in civil war ironman wasnt designed to fight cap either, cap refused (same as batman) to cooperate
Why is Civil War a Captain America movie? (Sigh)... I'm still not watching that shit Marvel, no matter how great you make the war. But hey tell you what get Spidey and your other interesting heroes for Avengers 3 and I'll consider watching that shit to, personaly I don't like Hulk, Iron Man, Captain America, Hawkeye, what's her name that kicks people, and any of those others, Thor is okay, but I much prefer the God over Marvels hero.
You obviously don't like marvel. That's fine with me since it's your opinion but I don't see how civil war is a bad thing.
Damn bro, you just hate it all. Watch a DC movie man. OR if you can make a better one come up with a dope script.
I don't hate Marvel I like Spider-Man, Blank Panther and X-Men, I mean that's pretty much it but yeah. I think its mainly because I grew up watching the 90's Spider-Man cartoon, as well as Batman and Superman, then came Justice Leauge Unlimited, and The Batman. Maybe if I read more like Spider Woman (whom I know a tiny bit about) and unknown ones like that I'd like more. I just wish Civil War was its own movie instead of being a Captain America movie. Oh and on my list above I forgot Deadpool, I like him to, but I guess he is Anti-Hero, so I don't really count him for Marvel heroes I like... and I'm ranting sorry.
werewolf914 I was thinking that if they ever made a civil war movie it would be two parts. The first part would be "Captain America Civil War" and the second "Ironman Civil War" so we see the war from both perspectives
It's a movie bro, they have no choice but to show EVERY side. Plus Iron Man is only making guest appearances since his trilogy is over for now. Trust me man, it's gonna be a great movie. Marvel doesn't let down the fans