Props to Ana for admitting she bought into the laptop-as-Russian-propaganda narrative. I have a lot of respect for her these days, it really feels like she woke up one day and realized that journalism should actually be about the truth. Big kudos 👍
When facts are presented, they always look like anti-conservative. That's not bias. NPR was always neutral and simply reported facts and/or two points of view on a subject.
They've been very bias on the border with illegal crossings, they've been very bias on COVID lab leak being misinformation, we now know thats not true, very bias on hunters laptop which we also now know is true, very critical reporting on Republicans but not the Democrat politicians literally chanting death to America and inciting insurrections
I prefer factual reporting. I used to listen to a lot of NPR many years ago during my daily long commutes. However during Obama's Presidency I heard a mild shift I wasn't sure about, which is what, in the end turns out to be what TYT and every other "media" does, concentrate on their opinions. Why not stick to the facts and provide education on policy, history and information that allows me to use my own critical thinking skills to develop my own opinions. It's limiting.
TYT, NPR and others at least reports on facts alot of the time. But yes, there are some subjects where bias interferes with fair coverage as is the case with any media company. There's alot worse than NPR and TYT.
I’ll never forgive the old guard feminists who fawned over Hillary like worker ants fawn over the queen and the DNC both colluding to ensure Bernie got frozen out. The one positive outcome of the POS Trump getting elected was seeing their faces and reactions when Trump was declared the winner.
I’ll never forgive the old guard feminists who fawned over Hillary like worker ants fawn over the queen and the DNC both colluding to ensure Bernie got frozen out. The one positive outcome of Trump getting elected was seeing their faces and reactions when Trump was declared the winner.
I’ll never forgive the old guard feminists who fawned over Hillary like worker ants fawn over the queen and the DNC both colluding to ensure Bernie got frozen out. The one positive outcome of Trump getting elected was seeing their faces and reactions when Trump was declared the winner.
Did you actually listen to this entire video? Toward the end she clearly distinguishes between an opinion channel like TYT and a (purportedly) news channel like NPR. These things must be held to different standards. News is not opinion and opinion is not news. Or do you actually listen to TYT for news?
Ever since the Republicans threatened NPR's funding way before 2016, and started accepting corporate sponsors, they haven't had the same journalistic integrity. I barely watch now.
Deciding not to cover an irrelevant and obviously manufactured scandal about Hunter's laptop was not bad journalism. That isn't important information for real reporters to amplify.
I have noticed, from This American Life to just any feature story outside of the headlines, it is like all racial minority and queer stories. Like for sure we need some of that stuff, but it must be like 70% of their total air time. Outside of game shows and headline news and that one Canada hour that airs at 10PM, it is probably 90%. I stopped listening because all their feature stories were so niche and had nothing to do with my life. Like every once in awhile there was a good story about a gay immigrant ballet instructor's struggle with Lyme disease, but it can't be wall to wall that shit.
Listening to stories about other cultures isn't fun? Npr is attempting to educate their mostly white base of listeners about other people's experiences in life. And that's a problem for you? Cool dude, just stare in a mirror if you're that self-interested.
Seems to me tyt and anna twists themselves in a knot to defend trump😂😂they don't even try to hide it anymore making trump the victim is the new ploy for tyt😂😂😂😂😂
@danpeezy2274probably not, but the American system and its politics certainly are with a fascist and extremist right-wing rapidly stealing a voice for racist and bigoted minority priorities seeking to strip the vast majority of its population of fundamental basic human rights, framing it exclusively around fundamentalist and extremist religious views.
Remember that Leftist BLM riot when 50 Secret Service officers were wounded outside the White House, May 31, 2020? Perhaps not b/c mainstream media quickly shifted the narrative to talk about only Trump holding a Bible upside down; as if the arson of 250-year-old St. John's Church was irrelevant.
Being fair doesn't mean trusting a proven liar the 100th time. Eventually being fair means being skeptical of someone like Trump when he says something.
“When you’re a journalist you focus on fairness, objectivity, not neutrality and you want to get to the bottom of the story. You want to get to the facts.” Well that rules out the young jurks! 😂
You think this is truth?! This guy cherry picked a few examples and colored the whole program in his "opinion" not some objective reality. And it's not one topic it's topic after topic after topic she's choosing to talk about this right winger stuff.
I have listened to NPR a long time and after the tax funding was cut to 25% of their budget in 2000, in 2001 NPR began to be more conservative and was quite full of anti-obama content and quite full of pro-Trump propaganda and normalization of his presidency. This man just wants NPR to sound more like Fox News. Cutting the tax fund allowed NPR to become tax supported conservative propaganda now controlled by wealthy individual and corporate donors, because when you own more than half the platform you decide the editorial content.
The guy who gave them all that info about the laptop is now in jail as a russian spy? So yes people were right to not give that story any airtime. It was an absolute joke.
I started listening to NPR in 1986 and stopped around 2018. Their reporting and subjective ideology started to contrast with objective reality and my daily experience .
Even NPR had to slightly shift its reportage on Israel-Gaza after public outcry on the unfair Israel bias. My suspicion is Uri's sudden awakening to liberal/leftist bias is very much connected to that. Saying this, I do not disagree with his critique. I do question the motive.
Is it that or is it that politics have gone so far right it appears NPR has changed? Because I've been around to watch the 'left' become the center and the right go off the deep end...
@@lunchboxs197 NPR has gone hard left. You can observe this yourself by simply paying attention to their messaging and what their priorities are. It sounds funny but you can learn a lot by simply listening to the other side too. Go watch some Fox News or Daily Wire. I've found that both sides of the political divide use pretty much the same strategy; ignore the radicals on their own side while highlighting the radicals on the other side. Both sides mislead their audience by omitting anything that challenges their narrative.
@@wtfdoihavetodohere nope. The entire country has gone right. NPR is still dead center just sharing information. Their "messaging" is sharing facts. That's it. The fact that the delusional puds on the right constantly lie and make up fake information doesn't change NPR.
Or you could defund the whole institution as an incentive to start over; start fresh; with a whole new crop of people, a whole new institution, learning the mistakes of the previous institution and vowing not to repeat them. To me, this is not about the liberal vs. conservative thing, this is about starting over. I've been saying this ever since I heard about NPR getting the Gabby Giffords story wrong.
How would that change anything, though? The right doesn't believe in public anything, so they would only participate to destroy public television. How about Republicans develop a spiirit of civic mindedness? A desire to contribute to the public good, so they can support a common goal of accurate and broad-minded reporting?
Almost none of media from the Guardian, NYT, NPR, CNN etc etc etc had anything but objectivity. I am a lifelong NPR listener but couldn't stand the absurd and inane shows and the high self regard bordering on arrogance and ignorance, etc. and I just had to quit listening 6 yrs ago. I've really lost something...one I used to greatly value.
Anna where is the commentary on the parts you disagreed with this former NPR employee? You told us you would point that out too. I only heard you speak on what you agreed with him.
Seeing it and voting according to it in your personal life, yes. Leaving out facts because you think they will lead people to the wrong conclusions, according to your personal beliefs? That's called propaganda. If you don't get that, I sure hope you aren't a journalist. Journalists reports the facts available from a place of neutrality and trust the public to reach their own conclusions.
@@FredGoldust there are no fair news at the moment, has not been for 25 years. what is happening is that they are not making it up, the other side just does not talk about certain things or events, since both side have echo chambers, they think the other side just lies, but the truth is that the 2 side pick up diferents stories to push their propaganda. so when someone mentions a story from the other side, they never heard about it at all, making them thing it is a lie.
I would bet my retirement account on the fact that you could not find a single NPR reporter let alone staff member who voted for Trump... Let alone KNOWS anyone in a personal capacity who voted for Trump.
@@johnandrews2768 It makes perfect sense for an organization that lobbies for (or against) a position to hire people who support that position; for an organization that purports to report, analyze and comment on politics generally might have some balance between political commitments of the staff members. If you really think that having EVERY member of the NPR editorial staff (87) that Berliner examined to be registered Democrat will not bias coverage of the news than why does this same community push a diversity narrative EVERY single day on almost every story they cover? NPR's claims of balanced, impartial, nuanced reporting is a joke. It's a left-wing version of Fox news: it's commentary...not coverage of politics.
@@brianshea4177 I think that job of journalism is to report FACTS, and TRUTH, and REALITY, not to find the balance between the left and right..which is why it makes sense to not have any right wingers on your staff...they have lost all connection to reality...they should have no place in REAL journalism, so if this reporting is true then thank you NPR
Give me a break. You’re so similar to Trump supporters who also demand consensus on all conservative issues like the 2nd Amendment, J6 “political prisoners”, Roe v Wade….
I met NPR in '93. We had a great relationship until a few years ago. Either I've changed or they have. We are now divorced. Free advice to journalists: do not begin a sentence with "ya know...". Um, i mean, like, right? Have they dumbed it down deliberately?
In my personal opinion, the current political and social climate over the past decade has become so polarized as a result of the radical and aggressive stance that the right wing conservatives has taken against the basic values and principles that our nation has strived to achieve and the contrast of the extremely harsh and oppressive stances that the current Republican Party have taken makes any moderate to liberal points of view appear radically biased when in reality those points of view merely reflect the thoughts and opinions of the majority of the American people. The right wing tries to convince us that black is white, that up is down, that grass isn’t green and the sky isn’t blue. And when someone opposes their claims and points out the obvious truth, they’re called biased. I’m a long time avid viewer and listener of NPR and I, personally, have not noticed that they have become more biased in their reporting. But this is just my own humble opinion.
What planet are you living on? The very reason you believe that democrat propaganda is because that's all you listen to. The entire piece is about NPR being democrat propaganda. It obviously worked on you.
I legitimately disagree and think this line of thinking is juvenile. It's an idealistic view that clings to an almost academic disposition of all things being fair. While you can absolutely argue the benefit of hindsight, journalists likely weren't losing sleep at night worrying if they were impartial in their reporting of the Nazi's.
If anything, NPR and other media outlets have tried too hard to be "fair" to Trump and to artificially even things out between "both sides". Often, the plain truth isn't good for Trump. That's not NPR's fault.
Maybe we go back to telling the truth and worrying about everyday things that affect our lives, instead of playing into the bullshift political games and grifting? America is having the rug pulled out from under it while tearing itself apart with stupidity.
Public Broadcasting has always had that whiff of almost comically earnest humanism. That's because those are the kind of people who get.involved with it. I know, having worked on and off the air at various oublic radio stations over the years. If people with other views want to be part of it, give of your time. But the fact us, when it comes to giving anything, the the right tends to fall short.
I like Ana but I am left wandering Is Ana's critique of NPR is just based on the word of a disgruntled editor, or is it based on her combing through NPRs archives of shows from 2016 onwards to come up with her conclusion on the biases of NPR?
I used to be a huge NPR fan. I was a sustaining member but yes it started to change around 2016, and it started to be off putting, but I kept listening, but 2020 with the fallout of George Floyd I stopped listening and I’m no longer a member. He’s exactly right. Luckily some folks like Ana have seen the light.
NPR lost me when they drop the show left right and center and clearly started becoming mostly propaganda and not respecting the audience that they can't take the truth and what really matters is good journalism
I stopped listening to TYT for a good while after the 2016 elections because this channel was largely indistinguishable from most mainstream news sites. Trump is R--gate 24/7. And for most news organizations that was a profitable business. It wasn't just NPR that went this direction.
Trying to be fair with some politicians sometimes don’t work. The ones that look to put out false info with use your fair process to further their agenda. Thus making you to bend your natural rules
I think I gave the TYT two thumbs up in one week... I need a cold compress. Listened subscribed to NPR since 1981had to stop listening and donating in 2016...
This is right wing whining. Congratulations for boosting Bari Weiss. The problem with NPR isn’t that it’s not open to right wing views, it’s that it’s too white-collar establishment biased. NPR bashes the left all the time, which is what 2016 made clear as well. NPR’s audience is overwhelmingly white collar latte liberals (which is annoying because I’m white collar and enjoy lattes myself!). Neutrality is not the same as objectivity.
"If you're a journalist you report the news, you don't make decisions...based on which politician you could be helping or hurting." Generally could be true, but when those politicians are trying to fukk your country over and become fascist dictatorships those rules go right out the window. Being a journalist does not mean you have to report on everything ever done. You get to choose the stories you write. Do the journalists at Golf magazine write a piece on how great the new Titleist golf clubs are and include reasons why maybe you should buy the Walmart golf clubs instead? No, they're writing about Titleist clubs.
Look, it’s very obvious that Republicans don’t listen to NPR because they are more determined that ideology is more important than facts. It’s more geared for liberal progressive thinking and so of course, NPR is going to provide more content for the majority of their audience that they want to hear. They provide factual news and opinion pieces.
I agree with your comment; but you also stated the problem. The job of the media, IMO, is to find and report the truth, not to tell their viewers what they want to hear. Right now, the public can’t even agree on facts, let alone get down to the truth.
There is almost zero progressive and liberal about NPR. They are corporate neoliberal Zionist neo-cons, maybe libertarian, but definitely NOT traditional liberal progressives.
This is just wild! Ana is saying Medhi Hasan is lumping conservatives into a singular Qanon pile, claiming there is a great degree of diversity in conservative thought, then in the next breath says NPR is limited to the singular democratic position!!! Is there no diversity on the liberal side?!!! 😂😂😂
The liberal side has little diversity. That's why the left is mad at liberals. Yet you guys believe that anything left of liberal is too extreme and shouldn't be paid attention to.
Pretty much lost my support. When the survival of Democracy is on the line, "journalistic integrity" needs to bend to the necessity of supporting the survival of the country that your ideals can live in. Cenk's anti Biden rants being a case in point.
I can see why balanced reporting seems offensive to you. You are used to 24/7 Trump bashing and that type of reporting has been normalized in your mind as fair.
this whole NPR thing is one disgruntled mans opinion. How is he judging the difference between "tough, straightforward coverage of a belligerent, truth impaired president" and what were "efforts to damage or topple trump"...after all, simply reporting his misdeeds (which was without doubt news) was damaging. unless he has evidence this is merely him claiming he can read minds.
Nope. NPR is part of the fourth estate trying to get rid of the outsider ( tangerine man). You need a more rounded understanding of the topic before putting up such short-sighted comments.
Exactly , what was NPR supposed to do , support a fascist takeover by the GOP ???? 💯 I'm glad they support freedom and democracy in America and didn't push the GOP's Russian-backed propaganda..💯💯💯
She moved up in the tax brackets, that's probably why. She noticed she wasn't getting the value for her dollars from government anymore. Yet she's not making enough to buy the services from government that the "rich" get.
@@eniselmenic5056 don’t have time to go digging, but let’s not be naive that TYT takes balanced perspectives. I know I was left unsettled by their takes on the Israel-Palestine issue. And, in this video, she admits to taking biased perspectives on various trump issues. oh, I would also say their opinions of Joe Rogan and anyone who was skeptical of the vaccines and how they were rolled out were highly motivated by ideology as opposed to science. Sorry I don’t have others off the cuff, but over a long time have observed the same type of reporting that is obviously from an ideological rather than journalistic perspective.
@@rjones8576 how can you say the opinion on antivaxers was ideological not scientific when the reality is that vaccines were safe and effective?... the science was right and so were TYT
NPR lost me as a donor and listener based on their anti-Bernie bias in 2016.
NO THIRD PARTIES, VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO TO STOP THE TRUMPER CULT OR ELSE YOU'RE THE ENEMY!1!1
I used to donate to NPR
They are worthless now.
You still donate to NPR, whether you want to or not...
Woah look at Ana being fair and unbiased.
LOL
Props to Ana for admitting she bought into the laptop-as-Russian-propaganda narrative. I have a lot of respect for her these days, it really feels like she woke up one day and realized that journalism should actually be about the truth. Big kudos 👍
That only leaves about five thousand other false reports she pushed that she needs to admit to. 🙄
@@christiansmith5047 LOL She's a mush-mouthed dwerp like most Fat Yam lovers. LOL
@@christiansmith5047 Well yeah, but ya gotta cheer for anyone escaping the woke thought-bubble :-)
Respect to Ana for admitting her faults.
Pathetic Blah Blah!
When facts are presented, they always look like anti-conservative. That's not bias.
NPR was always neutral and simply reported facts and/or two points of view on a subject.
..plz don't believe your lying eyes & ears ..you disagree with an insider with over decades..lib?.😅
@CarlosBlancas-hg4eh you don't believe any of them except this one
They've been very bias on the border with illegal crossings, they've been very bias on COVID lab leak being misinformation, we now know thats not true, very bias on hunters laptop which we also now know is true, very critical reporting on Republicans but not the Democrat politicians literally chanting death to America and inciting insurrections
What Wikipedia Teaches Us About Balancing Truth and Beliefs | Katherine Maher | TED
new head of NPR.
truth not as important as influence
87 editors that vote democrat.
0 editors that vote republican.
Yeah, I'd say that there's not much diversity at NPR.
Republicans don't support public anything, their only intention would be to dismantle NPR.
Please cite the 87 editors data you state.
That what education does
@@ernestoisjust1048 It was in the interview. TYT didn't include that.
I saw the full interview on another site.
@@donpoohjunio4060 Education?
Sounds more like strict indoctrination.
Well done once again Ana!
Ana, see? The Rushies love ya. LOL
ana has to make a constant, concerted effort not to say “go woke and go broke.” she wants to so badly 😶
What do you think "concerted" means?
@@christiansmith5047 it means don’t be a butthole
I prefer factual reporting. I used to listen to a lot of NPR many years ago during my daily long commutes. However during Obama's Presidency I heard a mild shift I wasn't sure about, which is what, in the end turns out to be what TYT and every other "media" does, concentrate on their opinions. Why not stick to the facts and provide education on policy, history and information that allows me to use my own critical thinking skills to develop my own opinions. It's limiting.
Puts people to sleep, that's why they like drama around Trump etc it gets views
TYT, NPR and others at least reports on facts alot of the time. But yes, there are some subjects where bias interferes with fair coverage as is the case with any media company. There's alot worse than NPR and TYT.
I'll never forgive NPR for the way they treated Bernie in 2016 and 2020.
@ev.h.3455 Yes, and I'm pumping your mom regularly.
I’ll never forgive the old guard feminists who fawned over Hillary like worker ants fawn over the queen and the DNC both colluding to ensure Bernie got frozen out. The one positive outcome of the POS Trump getting elected was seeing their faces and reactions when Trump was declared the winner.
I’ll never forgive the old guard feminists who fawned over Hillary like worker ants fawn over the queen and the DNC both colluding to ensure Bernie got frozen out. The one positive outcome of Trump getting elected was seeing their faces and reactions when Trump was declared the winner.
In the piece he did not mention that. He still has the bias, but it is the neoliberal.
I’ll never forgive the old guard feminists who fawned over Hillary like worker ants fawn over the queen and the DNC both colluding to ensure Bernie got frozen out. The one positive outcome of Trump getting elected was seeing their faces and reactions when Trump was declared the winner.
Does Anna realize she works in the Echo chamber she's describing
Anna has been trying to change in the last year so I think she's aware
Did you actually listen to this entire video? Toward the end she clearly distinguishes between an opinion channel like TYT and a (purportedly) news channel like NPR. These things must be held to different standards. News is not opinion and opinion is not news. Or do you actually listen to TYT for news?
@@consciouscrypto3090 the truth is there are no both sides when it come to this argument, one party is anti democratic the other is not chose one
Ever since the Republicans threatened NPR's funding way before 2016, and started accepting corporate sponsors, they haven't had the same journalistic integrity. I barely watch now.
They've NEVER had integrity.
Deciding not to cover an irrelevant and obviously manufactured scandal about Hunter's laptop was not bad journalism. That isn't important information for real reporters to amplify.
I have noticed, from This American Life to just any feature story outside of the headlines, it is like all racial minority and queer stories. Like for sure we need some of that stuff, but it must be like 70% of their total air time. Outside of game shows and headline news and that one Canada hour that airs at 10PM, it is probably 90%.
I stopped listening because all their feature stories were so niche and had nothing to do with my life. Like every once in awhile there was a good story about a gay immigrant ballet instructor's struggle with Lyme disease, but it can't be wall to wall that shit.
It's run by freaks
Listening to stories about other cultures isn't fun? Npr is attempting to educate their mostly white base of listeners about other people's experiences in life. And that's a problem for you? Cool dude, just stare in a mirror if you're that self-interested.
It can't be that hard for news anchors to stay neutral on the job, they used to do that all the time.
Seems to me tyt and anna twists themselves in a knot to defend trump😂😂they don't even try to hide it anymore making trump the victim is the new ploy for tyt😂😂😂😂😂
@danpeezy2274probably not, but the American system and its politics certainly are with a fascist and extremist right-wing rapidly stealing a voice for racist and bigoted minority priorities seeking to strip the vast majority of its population of fundamental basic human rights, framing it exclusively around fundamentalist and extremist religious views.
The only people surprised by the NPR story are the journalists working at NPR.
You surprised your Mum. You actually strung words together.
My biggest gripe with NPR and most mainstream media is their normalization of the insurrectionist traitor trump.
Remember that Leftist BLM riot when 50 Secret Service officers were wounded outside the White House, May 31, 2020? Perhaps not b/c mainstream media quickly shifted the narrative to talk about only Trump holding a Bible upside down; as if the arson of 250-year-old St. John's Church was irrelevant.
🤡
EVERYTHING Ana just said about NPR is true about TYT, and to an even greater extent.
Exactly
Being fair doesn't mean trusting a proven liar the 100th time. Eventually being fair means being skeptical of someone like Trump when he says something.
“When you’re a journalist you focus on fairness, objectivity, not neutrality and you want to get to the bottom of the story. You want to get to the facts.” Well that rules out the young jurks! 😂
Anna insisting on all of this right wing stuff, is driving me crazy.
Hey, truth is all that matters not sides
she is a NAZI!
You think this is truth?! This guy cherry picked a few examples and colored the whole program in his "opinion" not some objective reality.
And it's not one topic it's topic after topic after topic she's choosing to talk about this right winger stuff.
@@DriveandThrive I know it's the truth. Look up Gavin O'Blennis, fisa, and it's pretty obvious to most people what is going on with the lawfare.
Ana will be on the Daily Wire payroll very soon 😂
@danpeezy2274 "registered Republicans" you mean nazis?
I hope so. And Cenk too. Then the rest of you morons can stay here and listen to Jon Iadarola 😂
I have listened to NPR a long time and after the tax funding was cut to 25% of their budget in 2000, in 2001 NPR began to be more conservative and was quite full of anti-obama content and quite full of pro-Trump propaganda and normalization of his presidency. This man just wants NPR to sound more like Fox News.
Cutting the tax fund allowed NPR to become tax supported conservative propaganda now controlled by wealthy individual and corporate donors, because when you own more than half the platform you decide the editorial content.
The guy who gave them all that info about the laptop is now in jail as a russian spy? So yes people were right to not give that story any airtime. It was an absolute joke.
🤡😂
The degradation of npr started under bush/Cheney.
TYT pivoting hard
I started listening to NPR in 1986 and stopped around 2018. Their reporting and subjective ideology started to contrast with objective reality and my daily experience .
Even NPR had to slightly shift its reportage on Israel-Gaza after public outcry on the unfair Israel bias. My suspicion is Uri's sudden awakening to liberal/leftist bias is very much connected to that. Saying this, I do not disagree with his critique. I do question the motive.
The fact of the matter is George Floyd was murdered on live TV so don't try too sugar coat it so stay away from that conversation
I have listened to NPR since ancient times and they have indeed changed their tone.....
Is it that or is it that politics have gone so far right it appears NPR has changed? Because I've been around to watch the 'left' become the center and the right go off the deep end...
@@lunchboxs197 NPR has gone hard left. You can observe this yourself by simply paying attention to their messaging and what their priorities are. It sounds funny but you can learn a lot by simply listening to the other side too. Go watch some Fox News or Daily Wire. I've found that both sides of the political divide use pretty much the same strategy; ignore the radicals on their own side while highlighting the radicals on the other side. Both sides mislead their audience by omitting anything that challenges their narrative.
@@wtfdoihavetodohere nope. The entire country has gone right. NPR is still dead center just sharing information. Their "messaging" is sharing facts. That's it. The fact that the delusional puds on the right constantly lie and make up fake information doesn't change NPR.
Yep Ana is waking up. 👍
Or you could defund the whole institution as an incentive to start over; start fresh; with a whole new crop of people, a whole new institution, learning the mistakes of the previous institution and vowing not to repeat them.
To me, this is not about the liberal vs. conservative thing, this is about starting over. I've been saying this ever since I heard about NPR getting the Gabby Giffords story wrong.
Indeed. The government should not be in the business of funding any particular news entity.
How would that change anything, though? The right doesn't believe in public anything, so they would only participate to destroy public television. How about Republicans develop a spiirit of civic mindedness? A desire to contribute to the public good, so they can support a common goal of accurate and broad-minded reporting?
I agree 100%. This idea was long overdue to be used...
Almost none of media from the Guardian, NYT, NPR, CNN etc etc etc had anything but objectivity.
I am a lifelong NPR listener but couldn't stand the absurd and inane shows and the high self regard bordering on arrogance and ignorance, etc. and I just had to quit listening 6 yrs ago. I've really lost something...one I used to greatly value.
Anna seems to have a more mature perspective than most on this channel. We will see how much longer she will last.
Some of this is the most honest news reporting that I’ve heard on this UA-cam station. Wow!
Anna where is the commentary on the parts you disagreed with this former NPR employee? You told us you would point that out too. I only heard you speak on what you agreed with him.
NPR has become corporate media radio
Being an objective journalist does not mean that you cannot stand for a principal position or that you give up the ability to see right from wrong
Seeing it and voting according to it in your personal life, yes. Leaving out facts because you think they will lead people to the wrong conclusions, according to your personal beliefs? That's called propaganda. If you don't get that, I sure hope you aren't a journalist. Journalists reports the facts available from a place of neutrality and trust the public to reach their own conclusions.
NPR. Just neoliberals. Whats with the surprised pilachu face.
Grow up Ana. News isn’t supposed to be fair or both sides. It’s supposed to be objective and present facts regardless of what they are
No such thing as objective news
You think fair news is ignoring facts on one side and making them up about the other
@@FredGoldust there are no fair news at the moment, has not been for 25 years. what is happening is that they are not making it up, the other side just does not talk about certain things or events, since both side have echo chambers, they think the other side just lies, but the truth is that the 2 side pick up diferents stories to push their propaganda. so when someone mentions a story from the other side, they never heard about it at all, making them thing it is a lie.
PURPLE PILLED ANA
'When you point one finger at another, you point three back at yourself.' Thank you for showing us who you are TYT.
UGARTE: You think I'm a parasite.
RICK: I don't object to you being a parasite. Just a cut-rate one.
The hight of idiocy and hypocrisy is ANA lecturing NPR about journalistic principles, hypocrisy or bias!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Cenk bro you need another co-host. Shes going to become to become a right winger any day now tick tick tick
It’s the nature of free market capitalism. Eventually they all have to sell out.
You prefer propaganda not facts
she is already a nazi how have you not noticed????? next thing you know she will be doing the salute
Maybe the insider became more conservative. NPR has not changed in my listening.
Lol
I would bet my retirement account on the fact that you could not find a single NPR reporter let alone staff member who voted for Trump... Let alone KNOWS anyone in a personal capacity who voted for Trump.
Bro Trump doesn't believe in science how can anyone with a functioning brain support him.
@@kylesmoran👈🤡😂
This is the most pro NPR statement I have ever heard
@@johnandrews2768 It makes perfect sense for an organization that lobbies for (or against) a position to hire people who support that position; for an organization that purports to report, analyze and comment on politics generally might have some balance between political commitments of the staff members. If you really think that having EVERY member of the NPR editorial staff (87) that Berliner examined to be registered Democrat will not bias coverage of the news than why does this same community push a diversity narrative EVERY single day on almost every story they cover? NPR's claims of balanced, impartial, nuanced reporting is a joke. It's a left-wing version of Fox news: it's commentary...not coverage of politics.
@@brianshea4177 I think that job of journalism is to report FACTS, and TRUTH, and REALITY, not to find the balance between the left and right..which is why it makes sense to not have any right wingers on your staff...they have lost all connection to reality...they should have no place in REAL journalism, so if this reporting is true then thank you NPR
Ana can’t indicate what “diversity of opinion” means when it comes to modern republicans without showing her hand of becoming one herself.
Yes, Ana the die-hard Republican. 🤡
Give me a break. You’re so similar to Trump supporters who also demand consensus on all conservative issues like the 2nd Amendment, J6 “political prisoners”, Roe v Wade….
@mrsmartypants_1 they haven't realized they're no different than extremist on the right lol
yep ana has become a full blown nazi, cenk is slowly starting to go nazi style as well
I met NPR in '93. We had a great relationship until a few years ago. Either I've changed or they have. We are now divorced.
Free advice to journalists: do not begin a sentence with "ya know...".
Um, i mean, like, right?
Have they dumbed it down deliberately?
@@RockBrentwood I appreciate your thoughtful reply.
Ps, "amp up" is the correct phrase.
progressive, liberal, and democrat are not synonyms. it's terrible they've all come to mean the same thing for the masses.
progressives = trash, liberal = garbage, democrats = rubbish...oh look, synonyms!
In my personal opinion, the current political and social climate over the past decade has become so polarized as a result of the radical and aggressive stance that the right wing conservatives has taken against the basic values and principles that our nation has strived to achieve and the contrast of the extremely harsh and oppressive stances that the current Republican Party have taken makes any moderate to liberal points of view appear radically biased when in reality those points of view merely reflect the thoughts and opinions of the majority of the American people. The right wing tries to convince us that black is white, that up is down, that grass isn’t green and the sky isn’t blue. And when someone opposes their claims and points out the obvious truth, they’re called biased. I’m a long time avid viewer and listener of NPR and I, personally, have not noticed that they have become more biased in their reporting. But this is just my own humble opinion.
This piece is about NPR doing the same thing but on the left
What planet are you living on? The very reason you believe that democrat propaganda is because that's all you listen to. The entire piece is about NPR being democrat propaganda. It obviously worked on you.
I legitimately disagree and think this line of thinking is juvenile. It's an idealistic view that clings to an almost academic disposition of all things being fair.
While you can absolutely argue the benefit of hindsight, journalists likely weren't losing sleep at night worrying if they were impartial in their reporting of the Nazi's.
If anything, NPR and other media outlets have tried too hard to be "fair" to Trump and to artificially even things out between "both sides". Often, the plain truth isn't good for Trump. That's not NPR's fault.
Yup, that’s exactly the time I lost trust in them after the many many years of listening.
It’s videos like this that give TYT credibility and make me more willing to listen to their viewpoints. Trust is key
NPR? Never heard of her. Honestly I have never listened to them nor do I know anyone that does. Democracy Now>>> Npr.
Well Anna - NPR have just fired him so they don't seem to be in any "reflective mood"
A five-day suspension without pay is hardly firing.
The Young Turks, This is awesome! I subscribed because I want to see more!
they're inching closer and closer to fair journalism
This entire presentation could be interpreted as a savage critique of TYT.
Why is Cenk not on with Ana?
Because he afraid of clear thinking.
When she wants to boost right-wing talking points, she's on her own.
@@Chronix- Oh, I see. And Uri Berliner is boosting right-wing talking points?
Maybe we go back to telling the truth and worrying about everyday things that affect our lives, instead of playing into the bullshift political games and grifting? America is having the rug pulled out from under it while tearing itself apart with stupidity.
Public Broadcasting has always had that whiff of almost comically earnest humanism. That's because those are the kind of people who get.involved with it. I know, having worked on and off the air at various oublic radio stations over the years. If people with other views want to be part of it, give of your time. But the fact us, when it comes to giving anything, the the right tends to fall short.
NPR is pure propaganda
I like Ana but I am left wandering Is Ana's critique of NPR is just based on the word of a disgruntled editor, or is it based on her combing through NPRs archives of shows from 2016 onwards to come up with her conclusion on the biases of NPR?
I used to be a huge NPR fan. I was a sustaining member but yes it started to change around 2016, and it started to be off putting, but I kept listening, but 2020 with the fallout of George Floyd I stopped listening and I’m no longer a member. He’s exactly right. Luckily some folks like Ana have seen the light.
Same. To think i actually gave money to NPR at one time. NPR is an extension of the DNC
NPR lost me when they drop the show left right and center and clearly started becoming mostly propaganda and not respecting the audience that they can't take the truth and what really matters is good journalism
I stopped listening to TYT for a good while after the 2016 elections because this channel was largely indistinguishable from most mainstream news sites. Trump is R--gate 24/7. And for most news organizations that was a profitable business. It wasn't just NPR that went this direction.
Last time I listened to NPR, they were doing a story about unhoused female hygiene needs.
Last time I listened it was a story of a banjo luthier who had to apologize for his cultural appropriation of the instrument...
NPR and PBS should get MORE funding.
😂
National progressive radio. Defund NPR
NPR has been going down with corporate donations over the past forty years.
Money and greed ruin everything nice.
💯 % agreed.
Trying to be fair with some politicians sometimes don’t work. The ones that look to put out false info with use your fair process to further their agenda. Thus making you to bend your natural rules
What Wikipedia Teaches Us About Balancing Truth and Beliefs | Katherine Maher | TED
new head of NPR.
truth not as important as influence.
"..disbelief, anger and despair.."
Anyone that cared about our Republic had at least some of these feelings when Trump got elected.
If we're being honest, I'm gonna say Ana is definitely the eye candy at TYT
🤩 ❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥
Not Cenk?
Until she starts talking. That voice is shrill. Imagine an argument with her.
@@nikita-dh5je he pretty goo looking 🤗
@@StoutandSteady 😆 touche
Refreshing balanced reporting. Go Anna!
TYT has been getting way better lately, support from Egypt
I think I gave the TYT two thumbs up in one week... I need a cold compress.
Listened subscribed to NPR since 1981had to stop listening and donating in 2016...
This is right wing whining. Congratulations for boosting Bari Weiss. The problem with NPR isn’t that it’s not open to right wing views, it’s that it’s too white-collar establishment biased. NPR bashes the left all the time, which is what 2016 made clear as well. NPR’s audience is overwhelmingly white collar latte liberals (which is annoying because I’m white collar and enjoy lattes myself!). Neutrality is not the same as objectivity.
"If you're a journalist you report the news, you don't make decisions...based on which politician you could be helping or hurting."
Generally could be true, but when those politicians are trying to fukk your country over and become fascist dictatorships those rules go right out the window. Being a journalist does not mean you have to report on everything ever done. You get to choose the stories you write. Do the journalists at Golf magazine write a piece on how great the new Titleist golf clubs are and include reasons why maybe you should buy the Walmart golf clubs instead? No, they're writing about Titleist clubs.
Look, it’s very obvious that Republicans don’t listen to NPR because they are more determined that ideology is more important than facts. It’s more geared for liberal progressive thinking and so of course, NPR is going to provide more content for the majority of their audience that they want to hear. They provide factual news and opinion pieces.
I agree with your comment; but you also stated the problem. The job of the media, IMO, is to find and report the truth, not to tell their viewers what they want to hear. Right now, the public can’t even agree on facts, let alone get down to the truth.
There is almost zero progressive and liberal about NPR. They are corporate neoliberal Zionist neo-cons, maybe libertarian, but definitely NOT traditional liberal progressives.
i agree that companies should do that IF THEY ARE FOR PROFIT! but this is a non profit so they really shouldnt be doing that
When npr acted like the Bush / Cheney lie factory had legitimate arguments for invading Iraq they lost me.
You bet. They started giving air time to a complete set of wackos and treated them like they had valid viewpoints.
His name is Uri, meaning he is Russian.
People who still believe in Russiagate are no better than republican birthers who thought Obama was born in Kenya.
NPR has been broken for a long time. Too much corporate cash.
There's only one thing that matters..
If it ain't reality,
If it ain't the truth.
Then it's b*******...
😊
This is just wild! Ana is saying Medhi Hasan is lumping conservatives into a singular Qanon pile, claiming there is a great degree of diversity in conservative thought, then in the next breath says NPR is limited to the singular democratic position!!!
Is there no diversity on the liberal side?!!! 😂😂😂
But NPR is not the whole of the democratic party.
@@uche007us …irrelevant to this conversation. do you know what you are even responding to?
The liberal side has little diversity. That's why the left is mad at liberals. Yet you guys believe that anything left of liberal is too extreme and shouldn't be paid attention to.
Pretty much lost my support. When the survival of Democracy is on the line, "journalistic integrity" needs to bend to the necessity of supporting the survival of the country that your ideals can live in. Cenk's anti Biden rants being a case in point.
I can see why balanced reporting seems offensive to you. You are used to 24/7 Trump bashing and that type of reporting has been normalized in your mind as fair.
@@Russellviews
Lots of unwarranted assumptions there.
Sounds like a troll.
Opinions abound.
There are no facts, only interpretations.
@@Russellviews
More trollish garbage. Find somewhere else to play.
this whole NPR thing is one disgruntled mans opinion. How is he judging the difference between "tough, straightforward coverage of a belligerent, truth impaired president" and what were "efforts to damage or topple trump"...after all, simply reporting his misdeeds (which was without doubt news) was damaging. unless he has evidence this is merely him claiming he can read minds.
Nope. NPR is part of the fourth estate trying to get rid of the outsider ( tangerine man).
You need a more rounded understanding of the topic before putting up such short-sighted comments.
The most important problem in the world to talk about, according to Anna: "NPR ISN'T RIGHT WING ENOUGH!!!" kinda pathetic Anna.
It's not right wing at all.
Agreed
If America elected a fascist and we did obviously. I would want our press to avoid helping it.
Yes. Traitor Joe is a fascist who persecutes political opponents.
Have you read the Aesop fable "the wind and the sun"?
@@jackied962 kind and gentle persuasion is how trump should be talked into walking into oncoming traffic as far as I'm concerned
Trump is a fascist because of the mean tweets
Exactly , what was NPR supposed to do , support a fascist takeover by the GOP ???? 💯 I'm glad they support freedom and democracy in America and didn't push the GOP's Russian-backed propaganda..💯💯💯
That's fine, if only the USA still had moderate Republicans. Happy to hear from them,but they're nearly extinct.
Trump has to much fairness. Dude constantly gets multiple chances and benefit of the doubt in all aspects from political business and personal life
He truly should be in jail already..like years ago already.
I wonder if the voters on the right stay home or vote third party when they don’t support their candidate at the same rate as the voters on the left?
Anna just say you’re conservative now for some odd reason
She's clearly not conservative but she can see how insane the left has become
@@craighalpin896Indeed
She moved up in the tax brackets, that's probably why.
She noticed she wasn't getting the value for her dollars from government anymore.
Yet she's not making enough to buy the services from government that the "rich" get.
@@Juan-os4hs makes sense
@@Alex-vw4xl
Can you remind me what my comment was again, YT is hiding it from me?
It wildly ironic to hear her say journalistic fairness..this piece could have been about TYT instead of NPR.
WHAT EXACTLY WHERE THEY UNFAIR ABOUT? USE EXAMPLES
TYT isnt funded by taxpayers, totally different situation.
@@eniselmenic5056 don’t have time to go digging, but let’s not be naive that TYT takes balanced perspectives. I know I was left unsettled by their takes on the Israel-Palestine issue. And, in this video, she admits to taking biased perspectives on various trump issues. oh, I would also say their opinions of Joe Rogan and anyone who was skeptical of the vaccines and how they were rolled out were highly motivated by ideology as opposed to science. Sorry I don’t have others off the cuff, but over a long time have observed the same type of reporting that is obviously from an ideological rather than journalistic perspective.
@@rjones8576 the topic was JOURNALISTIC FAIRNESS. now you are talking about "balanced perspectives"... your honesty is in question.
@@rjones8576 how can you say the opinion on antivaxers was ideological not scientific when the reality is that vaccines were safe and effective?... the science was right and so were TYT
Ana proves, again and again, that she is the most astute and realistic journalist. Period.
Everything NPR is guilty of TYT has it in spades, just for some reason NPR is more respected
2024 is the year of truth and awakening...Ana is living proof of the awakening 🤣
I’m a republican who watch TYT regular because I think they have open minded and analyze news from both sides than CNN, FOX, or MSNBC etc
I voted for Hillary in 2016. I stopped listening to NPR after the election. I knew Russian collusion was a lie. Voted for Trump in 2020.
Wait a minute...Trump was in cahoots with Russia...that was proven...in the Mueller report
Read it.
@tombstoneshadowspdx Mueller, the guy that hates Trump? 😂 It was proven the Russia hoax, was just that a hoax..
You are the stupid!
LOFL How proud your folks are of the shite they took together.
Trump and Putin are still working together today. Why do you think Mike Johnson keeps blocking aid to Ukraine?