WB Is Ruining Batman Arkham Origins
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 сер 2024
- WB has apparently decided that fun just is not allowed anymore when it comes to the Batman Arkham series and Batman Arkham Origins is of course taking the hit. #gaming #batman #batmanarkham
My discord server
/ discord
Trophy Boosting Discord For Playing Arkham Origins
/ discord
Our Store!
enchantedglamo...
My New Threads profile!
www.threads.ne...
My New Channel - The King Of Creepy!
/ @kingofcreep
Degenerate Plays
/ @realdegenerateplays
Enchanting ASMR
/ @enchantingasmr1162
Magical Jill
/ @magicaljill
Fiction Fringe
/ @fictionfringe7860
Join the community
/ degeneratejay
/ discord
www.instagram....
/ degenerate-jay-1004669...
/ degeneratejay
/ degeneratejay
www.tiktok.com...
If youre interested in this issue, I posted in the community tab of my channel how to get in further contact with WB Games Montreal.
Hey jay im a huge Batman Arkham orgins fan I platinum the game back in 2016 if you want to trophy boost I’m ur guy and I hope the servers come back online like they were recently
Hey bro, thank you for repetitively talking about the unnecessary hate Origins gets. If we don't speak up, this game WILL be lost. I don't want this masterpiece to be lost in time just because of a company that lacks to care for its own games. I can obviously tell you don't either.
a
The disrespect for Origins not being ported to next gen consoles is crazy, Shame on WB
Origins was my favorite Arkham game
At least....the Xbox 360 version is backwards on Series X...so there's that...but seriously, Origins should have been remastered and ported to the next gen consoles by now....
Technically current gen but yeah
@@forward4370it was next gen at the time duh
That's why PC is superior to consoles.
If they actually acknowledged Origins, imagine all the additional games they could possibly make within that prequel timeline with Roger Craig Smith
Yeah I've mentioned this before. I think a lot of people are a little concerned about that avenue, just because Kevin Conroy was so beloved and people do not want to see him replaced, but I don't see it as replacing him. There obviously need to be successors to his amazing work in order to preserve and continue the characters existence for Batman. There have been plenty of voice actors for him, though. I argue Kevin is the absolute pinnacle of voice actor for the character, RCS was amazing and also I even thought Jensen Ackles did a fantastic job. I only want to see them return to this universe if there's something good to do with it,but if there is I would love to see that.
Yeah Orgins still is a 1000 times better than Gotham Knights
@@DegenerateJay I think any other projects should bring back Paul Dini. He seemed, to me, to be the backbone of the Arkham story continuity. My brother thinks they disrespect Origins because of its poorer numbers on release, and companies tend to focus on numbers as if nothing else exists. If you truly believe there would be good numbers for Origins, which I think there would be, I think it'd be advantageous to find away to prove and demonstrate undeniable numbers for specifically Origins. I don’t know what sort of thing could be arranged to show that.
Jeez, I'd love to see a Batman and Robin (Dick) sequel to origins, maybe a Nightwing Spinn-Off too.
That's what I thought they were gonna do with gotham knights, unfortunately they went in a horrible direction with horrible game play.
Arkham Origins is so underrated and a remaster would give it the second life it deserves
Preach
Yeah, the downside is that they would probably not make the multiplayer on it or make you buy it.
Especially if they changed some of the problems with the game and improved them. I liked how you could fast travel in Origins if there was a remastered version of the game I would definitely play it and post it on my channel.
@@Taliikitsuneefuck multi-player
@@Taliikitsuneethe multiplayer was pretty fun ngl
"You're having fun in the way we don't want you to have fun!" - WB Probably
Especially as someone whos favorite is origins it really just annoys me that they not only neglect, but actively ruin parts of it
You have to have fun the way they want you to have fun at all times while constantly paying them. If you're having fun at their expense at any moment, it must be shut down.
Blame the audience up until lately I have never seen video's like this or comment supporting origins, everyone hated it up until like a year ago
@@RuntzSZNliterally
@WorthyFPS its because when the game launched, it had plenty of glitches and bugs and the devs said they wouldnt fix it since they were working on the cold heart dlc for the game
The fact that I saw someone borderline blaming you for it going offline in these comments just crushed my faith in humanity.
I want an Arkham Origins remaster already!
I hate how much power people who don't enjoy or know anything about the game control the entire life of it in their hands
I just cannot understand why this and AC1 have not been remastered yet, game developers are so out of touch
I think AC 1 deserves a remake much more rather than a remaster ! I’ve replayed that game recently and I still think that game hasn’t aged well in many many aspects, that game DESPERATELY needs a remake ! It’s a good game but it hasn’t aged well ! And the rumors saying they wanna remake AC IV 🙄🙄🙄
If they remake it they'll probably ruin it. Just enjoy the original.
Out of touch? You realize the main Arkham audience didn't like origins? So why would game devs make a remaster that flop?
@@mrscruffles801 No "they" will ruin nothing i love this game but i don't want to play it on PS3.
@@firsttry2 Just play the PC version. No need for a full remake.
The argument that writers and actors "make enough money already, they're rich" which even if that were true, just because someone makes alot of money doesnt mean they are getting paid what they deserve and arent underpaid for the work that they do.
Yeah but nobody listens on it because all they care about is whatever the company tells them
@@hughjassman1227 most people just see it as "the rich want to get richer" because in their mind if you're "famous" then you must be rich. Which again even if someone is being paid alot of money doesn't mean it's how much they deserve. Alot of people are butthurt and blaming the writers and actors for delayed their precious movies and shows when it's the production companies that are the ones who are responsible for delaying a project.
@@tokyodeathghoul2313 Yeah I find that. Very sad. If people work hard they deserve to get something for it.
I think it’s a shame Origins is getting buried
It had the best bosses of the series and the most interesting take on Batman from all the games
Arkham Origins is my favorite of the quadrilogy, and I actually found the multiplayer to be a lot of fun.
I can’t believe WB hasn’t at the very least done a remaster.
It would be so easy for them to port this game honestly since the Ps5 and Series X could just brute force everything
I met a lot of my friends on Arkham Origins Online. The amount of disrespect the game gets is so annoying.
Friendship Origins
"WE GOT ROBIN!!! OH GOODY!!"@@Daanyaal_
Same
WB has always acted like arkham origins as a bastard son, but it was such a good game, and had a great story, and loved Roger craig smiths voice, of course 2nd to the Legendary Kevin Conroy, he'll always be my 1st
"Well j, its unrealistic for them to stay up"
"Then why make them"
Exactly, I've been thinking that for awhile now. Especially when it comes to live-service games. It should be a mandatory policy for game companies, "if your not willing to stick to your guns and keep the game alive, then DON'T make a live-service game".
How hard would it be to convert something near end of service life from server base to peer peer multi-player? That would be an answer for those companies if it's remotely feasible or even possible, though I seem to remember some games doing that in the past.
indeed, though i am wondering about the 1000s of games that came out in the wake of the online-multiplayer boom in the last 20 years with shoe-horned MP that SHOULD be it's own stand-alone product. I'm wondering how much better populated Metal Gear Online would be if it wasn't hidden inside a single-player Metal Gear Solid title every time... then they went and made Metal Gear Survive and totally missed the damn point of Metal Gear multiplayer...
Similar case happened with Splinter Cell: Blacklist. Anyone who's played a Splinter Cell game knows that they have the Spies vs Mercs game mode that was very popular. For the longest time, there was this Discord channel with hundreds of member who would play the game almost everyday, and we'd do lobbies etc... But out of the blue, the servers started to not respond, so we decided to all together write up reports to their support system asking if they would check and fix the servers. A month ish pass and still no response, servers still down, so we managed to downgrade the Ubisoft app to an older version and run online lobbies through a third party program, which kind of fixed the issue, and we could enjoy playing the game mode again. To our surprise, a week after that, we all got warning e-mails saying that any further attempts to play online through an outdated Uplay program would result in an account ban lol. Imagine Ubisoft threatening to ban us for trying to play a multiplayer game that their new updates broke. They took faster to flag us for using an older version than to fix the actual game. The discord server is pretty much dead now which is so sad
WB is really just banging their heads against the wall with the way DC movies and video games are going
So unfortunate man. Origins is my all time favorite Batman and Arkham game. Hate to see how they've been treating it
I seriously wonder what WB has against this game. Besides the bugs I thought the game was pretty good.
They probably have no one in there workforce that cares to advocate for it.
Those bugs are gone nowadays ✌
@@samuelesquivel6202 even on PC and Xbox One via backwards compatibility?
@@jangofett1172 on Pc I heard it still have some issues but on ps3 runs fine
The game was nearly killed on arrival when it realised because purists claimed it wasn’t an Arkham game because Rocksteady didn’t it and/or Conroy and Hamill weren’t voicing Batman and Joker. That and the game was buggy as hell when it came out, though people cut Origins a break when Arkham Knight’s PC port came out and was possibly even buggier than Origins.
In short, while the game is pretty popular today, WB hasn’t forgotten (or is unwilling to let go of) how much everyone hated the game when it first came out, and wants nothing more to do with Arkham Origins even if opinions have changed for the better.
Bro, blame the community for the downfall of Origins, there's nothing more to it. They shit on the game so hard WB don't want to do anything with it. It's like a girl you reject and then years later you realize she was great but at that point she's moved on with her life and could care less about you. Shit on the community not WB at least when it comes to Origins.
Exactly. While the game is widely loved nowadays, WB hasn’t forgotten how much everyone hated it when it came out.
@@Red-Ranger3142Because it was a broken mess. It's WB's fault.
No. This is like having an evil hot crazy wacko girlfriend that you finally dump after she sets your house on fire. Then, she finds Jesus, gets psychological help and becomes a great person and wife material.
The game RIGHTFULLY got crapped on when it came out. It was a technical disaster full of game breaking bugs.
Not to mention that it was basically the same as Arkham City.
@@themonsterunderyourbed9408 Okay the game breaking bugs I’ll give you, but the fact that Arkham City is basically the same as Arkham Origins? WB was told to make an entry in a game series that they hadn’t worked on before in order to keep franchise hype alive while Rocksteady worked on Arkham Knight and had to make a game at least as big as Arkham City in the same amount of time Rocksteady had to make the much smaller Arkham Asylum.
Tasked to make such a large game in a series they were unfamiliar with in a 21 month time frame it only made sense to reuse assets. Sure it would have been nice if it was was more original but given the time restrictions given by the higher ups (who wanted another game released two years after City) I wouldn’t complain about reused assets when they had this task forced upon them.
Just a thought, but maybe get a petition going to deliver to WBs asking for a Remaster of Origins, raise the point that with a Remaster of a 10 year old game it will have the support of its older customers as well as new players. I just wanna play as Deathstroke again 😅
They should just take this multiplayer, add more maps and characters, then release it as a standalone. Guarantee it'll be more popular than Gotham Knights
Probably not, the reason the majority hated Gotham knights is because it had a gear system and people automatically thought microtransactions and live service. If they did resell the online for origins people would complain about making an arkham game with no story, no Kevin and microtransactions. Society likes to bully game companies to make single player games unless it's Cod, any other properties that try to transition to live service gets review bombed and hated.
That's just sad and Pathetic @@samburgerwithcheeze8145
The profit incentive is the worst enemy of the preservation of videogames as a media. Companies time and time again make anti consumer policies with all different things. They ban people for emulating decades-old games that have been out of the market for years (Nintendo for example), they ignore old videogames with a solid fanbase only because they calculate that selling plushies or something is more profitable, they make online games scarce by removing the option to install them after some time etc.
We need a videogame community that is only focused on having fun and enjoying games in every way possible.
What terrible timing, I was also looking to 100% the game on pc, and unless something changes it looks like that won't be possible anymore. Considering how many people have been making content about the arkham games over the years, it seems baffling that WB would try and sweep this game under the rug.
This echoes what is going on with Call of Duty and Activision. There is no upkeep with old COD servers and it is completely unsafe to play the games online on PC, due to hackers being able to download malware to your computer. People who have made community patches have been sent cease and desist letters for their hard work and contribution to maintain old, unprofitable games.
Why billion dollar companies like WB and Activision hate seeing their customers happy and continue to play their games and are actively ruining them is beyond me. This is even worse considering how ass Gotham Knights was, WB really has been driving the arkham franchise into the ground, which I'm sure is sad for all of us.
This was the only one where Batman actually fought the villains. Croc, Bane, Deathstroke. Lady Shiva? Forgot who the female was...he fought more bosses, I should say, in this one, than he did in the other games. I'd love for them to make it digital and playable on series X.
There's like a whole decade of stories and worldbuilding they could still go through between the events of Origins and Asylum, and that would give them an opportunity to do a real *Batman & Robin* type game, showing the origins, heh, of Dick joining Bruce's mission, him taking on his first real on the job partner, and how that shapes him from the end of Origins, where we see that he realizes he has to do more than just channel his rage at criminals, and how he gets to be the Batman we know in AA, AC, and AK.
A true bummer indeed. Fingers crossed at some point with the packets that were captured someone will be able reverse engineer and get the servers back online for ps3. Knock on wood! Great video!
This was my favorite MP game.. I haven't been able to play it in years and I really, REALLY miss it.
As a Batman fan, I think the multiplayer had a lot of potential. I bought Arkham Origins for the multiplayer primarily (wasn’t feeling the prequel story), and was unfortunately barely able to play due to how broken the search engine was. If they fixed it up, and continued to add content, I really do think it would have been very successful.
It was difficult to populate a room to play but I always fired off game invites and it usually worked. I really miss that game, I loved it! @@Zoogi.e
Penguin side mission gives you some online crates to open lol @@Zoogi.e
I had to sub after that variety channel bit. Too relatable
This just reminds me how a bunch of underrated games that had decent stories had multiplayer modes that most people will forget due to the fact that most of the still running servers are on 360 or ps3 servers that will almost never see the light of day again with my main point being origins, splinter cell blacklist and spec ops the line with the pc servers being basically dead and shut down years ago with the console servers still staying up with a small and dwindling player base
So pissed about this Bruh 🤦🏾♂️ Didn’t even get a chance to hop on the multiplayer cause I’ve been busy with other things these last couple weeks
If Origins got a next gen port sure, but this is an extra minigame mode in a game whose main selling point is a single player story. It's a miracle it didn't shut down 5 years ago, let alone now.
Honestly I want a arkham origins trilogy leading into arkham asylum with Roger craig smith as batman. I actually loved the more brutal younger version of Kevin's batman it was great!!
Hey, im apart of the pc arkham origins community. The servers went down about a month or two ago and we contacted wb about it and they actually turned it back on for us on pc
Is there a way this can be done for PS3?
I’ve recently replayed and finished the first 3 Arkham games and I was shocked that Arkham city became my least favorite!!!!!!!!! It had always been my fav 😂 and ironically origins has become my fav ! 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 SHOCKING!! And the fact what WB does towards this game is just disgusting 🤢
I've been playing Origins online on and off for a couple years. Temporary outages are sadly pretty normal. Usually only a few hours, sometimes a day or two.
I don't know the technical details but as I understand it Origins online was officially terminated back in 2016 because of some contract issue with the servers. Because the physical servers are also used for some other games it was easier just to put a lock on Origins than to actually shut down the Origins part of the server.
They either don't know or don't care that the servers are still being unofficially used (which I think is more likely). Either way the Origins servers don't get proper maintenance attention.
EDIT:
Just remembered there's a guy working on making private servers for Origins Online. I don't know where he is with that project but last I heard it seemed to be going pretty well. If it works we won't have to worry about the official servers inevitably going down.
Edit 2:
The private server is called Arkham Revived and from a quick scroll through the comments here and the discords it looks like it is functional.
It still frustrates me that arkham orgins still doesn't have a remaster, even though it honestly needs one the most.
Exactly.
It seems like people are finally starting to realize how great Arkham Origins was. It has some of the best boss fights in the entire series, the voice acting is phenomenal, it has some of the coolest cutscenes in the whole series, the christmas setting is amazing. It’s just an awesome game.
Return to Arkham's performance on the base Ps4 and Xbone was disgusting. I find it surprising that i was able to platinum both Return to Arkham Asylum and City on it.
Xbox one X and Series X has 60fps (X Enhanced) but only in Riddler's revenge and Asylum's Challenge mode. (Asylum in Story was 45fps)
Origins had INCREDIBLE multiplayer. I still think about it to this day haha
Honestly, I love the idea of the Arkham multiplayer. I’ve never gotten a chance to play it (I’ve been having some issues getting my PlayStation 3 to connect to the Internet) but I always thought it would be a really surreal experience.
If you end up playing as one of the henchmen, you were essentially have to fight the character you’ve been playing most of these games as. It’s fun to say “Mandy’s henchman are idiots, but another thing to actually plays at henchman and see if you can do any better.
Well, the same time if you’re playing as Batman and robin, it’s a greater challenge than the main game in someways, since instead of fighting against an AI, that you can easily anticipate, you know, I have to play against other players, who most likely are familiar with how Batman plays. They know not to stand under gargoyles, and to keep a lookout for grates that can be used against them.
And then, as the cherry on top, if you play your cards, right, you have a chance of playing as Joker and Bane.
All of this sounds really cool and honestly could’ve been a game. All lights are on, but I’m happy that it was packaged with a game I already love. (Even if I have yet to experience the multiplayer.)
So the fact Warner Bros. seems to want to everything in their power to make you forget the multiplayer and the rest of the game in general is kind of sad.
Just regarding your network issues:
Try connecting to a 2.4GHz network, see if that works. If not, try checking the components inside the console.
Don’t worry Jay! the PC community have made a whole new server called “Arkham Revived” the multiplayer is now playable again on PC
This makes me think of EA cancelling "Alice: Asylum" because they can't drain microtransactions from it. :/ A LOT of fans are asking EA to change their minds.
Origins was on sale for $5 on Steam a couple days ago and I haven't had the chance to play the multiplayer before. I took the opportunity and bought the game a couple times to gift it to some friends, just for the multiplayer to stop working. I've been playing a lot of origins, and it sucks to know that there's a whole different section of the game I might not ever be able to experience, all because WB won't give the game the respect it deserves
ok I think it still works on PC but that's gotta suck for anyone that plays it on ps3
5$ for my Xbox 360 is how much i Physically got it for in Gamestop 2019@@dojindori
I do not understand why so many companies want to release games that are half cuz the people that buy those games tell other people that they're incomplete and the other people either don't end up buying it at all or they wait about 8 months for the game to be how it should have been at launch they would make more sales off the rip if they just gave us a completed game
servers still work on PC with the revived servers, just gotta update a file, thankfully
The Multiplayer has been dead (read: unplayabe) since launch in Australia. The platinum was never achievable Down Under, as far as I know. I was never able to join a game.
Arkham Origins, the aligned transformers games and Evolve are some of my favourite multiplayer experiences. All of which are gone officially now, especially on console.
These games made my childhood and core memories with friends, all of which I'll never be able to go back to.
I agree with everything you said up to the writers part...I'm a video editor, I have a degree and several courses and I've spent a long time without being able to live with this job alone. Where am I going to go on strike? I know that this type of product has its value measured only by market offer...
If I had gone on strike, I would have suffered much more and would not be where I am today. How do they have this right if they are not so privileged?
This is another puzzling thing abut WB Games. Shadow of Mordor had 1 online trophy/achievement, once the servers were closed, they actually patched the game to make the trophy be obtainable offline. Mad Max had an online scrap system where you'd earn scrap while NOT playing the game (which were tied to 2 challenges), when the servers closed, it made the challenge trophy/achievement unobtainable because you could no longer earn scrap and it was never patched. Mad Max is still for sale on the PSN Store for $25 (CDN) with a key feature removed from it's game. Why patch Mordor but not Mad Max? Why even bother having online features for single-player games?
I do give Arkham Origins respect because this was made to give Rocksteady more time to develop Arkham Knight and it was AMAZING!!!
So it was a rushed cash grab meant to keep up the release cycle and line the pockets of CEOs and keep investors happy?
Hey Jay how are you?
I'm alright hbu?
Doin alright. I'm a fan of your content. Keep doin what you do
WB just stands for wasted botential
My only issue is that origins still isn’t functionable and has game breaking bugs that require complete restarts
For Mad Max game from Avalanche studio, but with the cooperation of WB Montreal , it's impossible to have the platinum, because they shut down the servers and there's two trophies online.
Origin is my second favorite arkham game. Wish it get a remaster like the others
I like origins for the multiplayer, it’s the only Arkham game I never completed, but that’s because I was annoyed the game used assets from the older games including parts of the map.
However the multiplayer is sick, and I wish WB would reconsider because I wanted to buy this game again specifically for the multiplayer.
Also Someday I hope AI can replace shutting down multiplayer games, by using ai for replacements to real players
You wait... the next thing will be the announcement of the paid "WB season pass" with which you regain access to the old servers. Everybody wins...!
Origins multiplayer with the boys in middle school was peak gaming…..
#FreeArkhamorigins come on boys we can make this a movement we're going to get the game back
'A company with WB which has so much money behind it-' WB is 50 billion dollars in debt.
What will anyone do, this world is just like that
I love Batman Arkham Origins and tbh, it's probably my favorite of the series. And I loved the multiplayer, it was a ton of fun, and honestly, I'd love to find a way to play that again, I've been replaying the game and I'm loving it. I'm playing it on PC now, so, I'm sure I can find a mod to play the multiplayer, but yea lol.
I had this game on disc while it was still releasing DLC. When the mr. Freeze Cold Cold Heart DLC available I bought. I could not get this to work anyway with my gate. I ended up calling and going through websites everything and could not get one so I ended up having to buy the game digitally as well. After that it worked fine, but their support was absolutely no help at all.
How did you buy the game digitally? been trying like a bastard to find some kind of digital code for the game looking for some kind of miracle in the vain hope of actually being able to play it again
When it was digital on xbox it was 19.99$ but i still have it Physically anyway and have x16 Anisotropic filtering when playing it on my One X@@MrLeerolljankins
I just found out that online still work but there's no one in the lobby unless you work with the Discord people
bro thank you so much for making this video i 100 percent agree with everything . Thank you !
Becuase these corporations don't give a shit, all they care about is money. They don't care if the fans are happy, they don't care if you like thier product, they just care about things that'll sell and make as much money as possible
It would be funny if some guy hated you that much that he saw your vid and walked straight to the server room😂
The cinematically in Origins were top notch. I really loved that game, except for the map. It was a little cumbersome traversing the bridge.
I agree with everything in this video. I went out of my way to play this game at 60fps buying an expensive laptop and everything years ago. Still couldn’t port it when doing return to Arkham? That’s why I didn’t buy it. It was my favorite of all the Arkham games. If they got it on the new consoles at 60fps I’d buy it day one.
With WB I'm at a point where I expect nothing but incompetence and stupidity.
With Uncharted 2/3 servers gone its still possible to get the trophies because they had LAN modes which could be exploited to get online through xlink kai. The only true servers that are left on ps3 are pretty much only Battlefield 3 and Call of Duty Games. Cod devs can afford it but Battlefield devs made a 300 IQ move. They allowed servers to be RENTED. ON A PS3. You can literally hop on PS3 BF3 online and go into server rental and pay for it. This keeps both companies and players happy. Why not more devs thought of it is beyond me.
Still got my disc of this great game
First thing i see was an Underrated Multiplayer to start the video
Man that abusive relationship analogy really hit the nail on head 🤯👍
Honestly I love Origins but never got the chance to play the multiplayer but it looks super super fun! Imagine if they ever did another Arkham game they could refine the multiplayer and you're able to choose what Gang you wanna be apart of in this huge Gang War and you're able to play as Heros like Red Hood Nightwing or Batgirl that'd be awesome!
This game has been my favorite since release. Black Mask and the Deathstroke boss fight are some of the best parts of the series, not to mention the game has the best dlc, Cold Cold Heart.
Imagine an arkham origins remaster including an arkham blackgate expansion too without the 2.5D
Lets go new vid
I saw a really good video by a guy named Endymion about gaming corporations and why allot of them were attacking games like Elden Ring. Basically, Elden Ring was a game that guaranteed players a great time but over performed that guarantee and made the game so much more enjoyable, and tons of games corporations hate that! It means that these gaming corporations will have to meet that standards of the customer rather than the customer meeting the standards of the company, and oh boy does the company have low goals when it comes to making games. No customer should ever have to lower their standards for a product built by billion dollar companies.
Arkham origins is my favourite batman game.I wish wb just remastered it.
WB messed up making Gotham Knights. They should of made the long rumoured Origins 2. Just think bout it. They could of released Origins 2 and Origins Remake. 2 separate products that would sell. And they could sold a double pack. They left so much money on the table.
They missed out on adding it three times return to Arkham the Arkham collection and then the rerelease on the switch
I never played the Arkham games online but I can see where you’re coming from. It’s frustrating as it seems as though WB just cannot see what ‘we’ all see - common sense decisions seem to get F’d up by them with every DCEU/Arkhamverse/Origins-verse decision. It’s literally like they go out their way to do the opposite of what people like/want. I’m a massive DC fan and a huge fan of ALL the Arkham games. And I too don’t feel excited about SS:THJL or the movie reboots. Everyone can point and complain about the amount of content that Marvel has produced but no-one can deny that they are the kings and queens of world building and driving personal investment from the viewers and players. I can’t stand the fact that Cavill, Gadot, Fisher etc are all out the picture but maybe James Gunn will turn things around - here’s hoping
Only one Arkham gmae had online and that was Origins the others just have leaderboards.
I'd love to see it remastered. If they're going to remove the servers for the original, remaster it for current gen and pc. Polish graphics and performance, add some new sp and mp skins, new mp maps, game modes, weapons etc. That would be amazing
Honestly, if they just took care of the screen tearing, I'd be happy with that.
@@themonsterunderyourbed9408 the performance on pc isn't great. Not the worst but I did have some consistent issues too
If this game was remastered and polished more for next gen consoles, this game would do amazing today
I can't help the feeling in situations like this that they know a large number of people will prefer playing the older games more than the newer ones. It's happened with loads of EA titles for example. Especially I noticed this since they took over the F1 series. They are routinely now just removing the titles from as little as 2 years ago from Steam. The reason is obvious. I am still playing the 2019 version of their game, which I paid like $15 for and will never spend another penny on. And there is just so much DLC and "games as a service" BS in newer versions which gets worse as each year passes.
Sad story my mom said she got this game for me for Christmas but never did so I never got to play at all. I remembered this game in my adult years 3 years ago so I bought to play on Xbox .Surprise never got to enjoy the multiplayer. Have watched a lot of people play it sad I’ll never get to. Be glad for your memories guys I fucking love all the Arkham games ,sad I’ll never get to play origin’s multiplayer.
Maybe they should make a Robin game or like a Teen Titans ultimate alliance type game because Batman is ran to the ground.
Crazy how it’s arguably the best game in the series yet they act like it doesn’t exist 😭
3:44
There's a lot of reasons why a game's servers can be shut down even if it's irrelevant to the cost. EA keeps Spore servers up despite it being at a loss, for example.
The biggest ones are security risks for other players, lots of hackers due to an outdated or no longer functional anti-cheat, DDoS or DoS attacks, no longer wanting to do maintenance on something without a playerbase, or making room for another Server because the old one doesn't have enough players to justify it's existence.
So many of those could apply to Batman Origins that I wouldn't even know which one to pick, but the point is it just isn't practical to keep something around when there is no demand and other things need attention. 100 players sounds like a lot to us, but that is absolutely nothing to a company like WB. At least we have Community Servers on PC as a mod, by the sound of it; that tends to be the best way to preserve these kinds of games.
12:45
That's also funny to mention; that usually happens because the company is actually developing a remake or modern port themselves. Halo, GTA, RDR (allegedly), etc. are all examples of that. Nintendo is an exception, though.
Rockstar did the same thing to GTA online for PS3 and it still had loads of people playing it
Personally, I loved the concept of Arkham Origin's multiplayer: a Batman-themed, three-team battle pitting the Caped Crusaders against the warring gangs of Joker and Bane.
The concept of a shooter game set in crime-ridden Gotham is heavily slept on, and the best we got apart from Origins was Gotham City Impostors.
Hell, WB could probably make a GTA-style game set on the streets of Gotham, with the ever present threat of Batman and his allies coming down on you hard at any given time.
Ugh I’d love to see this and Blackgate come to Switch, along with an updated version of the multiplayer….I’d pay good money for that
Damn I thought it was gone ages ago. Now I have missed my chance. 😞
This game deserves the remaster it was a good game in my opinion was two of the best boss fights, deathstroke,(this still is one of my favorite one v one fights ))) and fight bane
This game needs a remaster including the multiplayer then some sequels set before Asylum like a Long Halloween Based game set a year or two after this one
I liked origins, i thought it was a great game with great voice acting, it had the best boss fights (besides the mr freeze fight in city). A remaster of origins could kead to great sequels to that time line. But from what i see WB roesnt care anymore how things look, the new flash movie and the WB games coming out.
Batman Arkham Origins should be remastered to see if theres interest in continuing the Arkham Origins timeline or get an Batman Arkham Origins remake