no, it's not. it's just an overpriced gadget for people who have more money than they know what to do with. you're paying for the name and perceived status, nothing more.
I may be biased, as I own a PP; but, while I greatly respect your AP Jumbo, I love the Nautilus, and even much prefer it’s band. The contrasting polish/satin finish is stunning. Two stellar timepieces.
Have always preferred wearing the Audemars however more recently I decided to buy a Patek, got to say it but I prefer the Patek. Not sure if it’s because the watch has gained popularity in the last few years but I got allot of complements when I was wearing it. Definitely worth a buy.
4K with great lighting. Your beautiful photography showed off those pieces wonderfully. Sometimes it's hard to show off watches on camera. And it's often difficult getting a good enough look at them on UA-cam. So please, keep up the good work.
Prices actually more or less the same. You would also pay at least an additional 9-10.000 for moonphase complications. Personally I think the most beatiful Royal Oak and Nautilus are the original ones without the complications. They simply distract the lines in the original design
That's a difficult pick. The PP would just take for me. Your collection to be honest is what I would like to achieve. There isn't one watch I wouldn't love to have. Your a lucky (I'm sure deserved) man. Cracking reviews keep it up
I personally would prefer 5711 to 5712, but from the author's perspective, it makes sense to choose 5712. Both AP and Patek are gorgeous. True icons. Hope to have one someday.
As much as i enjoy the nautilus and how it fits on my wrist, i am not a fan of the dial layout of this particular model so I would go with the much simpler ap for this head to head.. My ideal choice between the two brands with models that have similar functions, would be the 26574 from ap. the dial is just so well executed that i could forego the power reserve function. regardless, excellent acquisitions and videos as always.
Both come with really excellent boxes but Patek’s box and papers are just have an even more luxurious feel. This is why Patek is #1 and any serious collector will tell you that it doesn’t get better than Patek. Even someone like Mr. Biver who worked for AP, helped restart Blancpain and today runs Hublot is most proud of his vintage Patek collection.
I like the fact you show the whole 'package' as it were. Boxes, papers etc and not just the watches. For my tiny wrists I'd have to go for the AP Royal Oak in 36mm. I think its discontinued now? What's your opinion between the 14790ST/O/0789ST/07 Vs. a 14790ST.OO.0789ST.10 ? Also I hear APs are a bit more delicate movement wise?
Patek wins here. Having a Nautilus is a privilege. It’s very difficult to get one and the watch movement is night and day with AP one. For now it’s about 8-10 years of waiting list... but if you want to be on this list you must be someone. That’s why my boss bought one 5711 at 55k on gray market instead of 30. I understood when I looked at this beauty for real. It’s the grail watch without doubt.
Either of these watches would make me very happy. I love the bracelet on the AP but, for me it would still be the Patek. Great video as usual, I love you reviews. 👍
Both are winners for me but if it has to come down to making a choice it had to be the AP for being original and of course the bracelet is the best in the industry....
I am aware of it...AP Royal Oak was introduced in 1972 Basel world and Nautilus was introduced in 1976, four years after AP...I like them both but just feel that the AP was the one that introduced the design with Gerald Genta...I still love them both....
This is quickly becoming one of my favorite watch channels. With all those complications, I have to say, PP > AP but AP's case back is outstanding. Great review!
Recently acquired my 15400 blue dial and I will say the Royal oak bracelet is by far the best bracelet. Much better then the Nautilus bracelet which I felt was so thin and light. But I love the case height of my 5711.
Personally I would go with Patek as it can be both sporty and classic. I see you have reviewed more Patek than AP so guessing you're on the same side as me ;) Also can you review A. Lange & Söhne? :D
Having worn both for a while I eventually settled on an AP 26331 (it’s basically a jumbo with a chronograph). Don’t get my wrong the 57xx series is fantastic but to me it really falls behind on the bracelet. Patek went back to using pins in the links not screws and that to me isn’t good enough on a watch like this. The Royal Oak bracelet hugs your wrist do damn well. The 5712 may still be my grail watch and I was thinking about it......until I tried a Lange Zeitwerk. I think that might be my ultimate unicorn and I won’t have to wait years for it. The reality is, with a significant sales history I can get on a 5712 list but not on a 5711 without owning a notable Patek already
You can tell more finishing went into the PP verses the AP. That kind of distinguishes the two watches. AP for impressing folks at the upscale bar. The PP for impressing the other gentleman on the yacht.
For me it's like comparing a Ferrari (the PP) with a high-end Mercedes (the AP). Yes, my first tendency is to go for the Ferrari, but the Mercedes would be much more practical day-to-day, less of a hassle to maintain, less expensive to service
It's good to reward ourselves sometimes . While I'm not one to spend on high-end watch (I spend too much money on travel, lol), I can appreciate your gorgeous and timeless watch. I love how it's a symbol of all your hard work.And i choose NKUWAN every time honestly
For me is ap then patek Oh and yesterday was the first ever time I saw a ap but a person was wearing it so don't think I saw it in a jewlery store or something
AP is sportier and PP is classier. The best is to have both. I love both. But the way I dress and the way I live my life, AP is better for me. Furthermore, the way PP increased the size to 41mm with 5811/1G, today I prefer by far 16202. It has a better movement and nothing will ever beat size 39mm.
the 5712 is the winner for me and the bracelet is much more comfortable and has a higher waterproof capabilities, more complicated... much more beautiful also
Greetings,these are the two best watch brands in the world but the cleanliness of the AUDEMARS PIGUET gives me what I love to see time on a watch that wonders ,thank you for this video ,greetings from Italy bye ...
The PP dial is somewhat unbalanced.. they should have played with the position of the subdials into a 3-6-9 position configuration and it would be perfect
I know that Patek is amazing and beautiful in its own right, but something kept making me more attracted to that AP. Regardless both beautiful watches!
Jumbo is my all time favourite,period.I don't even look at nautilus,although I know the importance of the watch and the army of admirers.First thing that puts me off is the bracelet.I can not stand polished and brushed parts together,and that goes also for the new rolex two tone bracelets,although I think the oyster is a fantastic bracelet.Nautilus is a far from bad or ugly watch,it is just Jumbo wins in my eyes,all the way.Great review of two such an iconic pieces.
I like the PP chain/bracelet and love the AP dial. Has anyone thought of mixing up luxury watches? Is it even possible? :D Then again the AP chain matches the dial so I'll give it to AP as well. I like how the iced out APs look. Does anyone even wear these watches outside or they are just for display as a collection?
The Royal Oak is the original creation, the Nautilus is just an inspiration/copy of the Royal Oak for Patek Philippe. The Royal Oak has more class, look so much better and have more masculinity than the Nautilus. The Nautilus looks like the women's version of the Royal Oak. x) Personally, I really love the lines of the Royal Oak as the Nautilus does me no effect and has absolutely no power of attraction on me. (For me, it's a women's watch) No matter what the experts may think... I don't care! Gerald Genta himself recognized that his most beautiful creation was the Royal Oak... ;) And even historically speaking, the AP has inspired so many creators in the industry while the PP "copy" absolutely not... Only one of them will have marked the history of his imprint. For me, there is absolutely no match...
You have an awesome collection! Beautifull all time classic timepieces. But the prices for ap and pp are just out of this world. Dont get me wrong, those are realy nice watches but are they realy worth 30k? I mean they might cost .5 to 1k to produce. But dont get me wrong. A realy beautifull collection of classics👍🏻
I had an AP Royal Oak about 4 years ago .. and it just didn't click.. sold it for a small loss and got two more Rolexes instead (shrug) .. it was nice, but .. I don't know.. was just odd looking and feeling and I didn't like the clasp after wearing it for a few weeks.. I think it was around .. 20k .. but the box was different, wooden lacquered, and the manual/papers were a larger book if I recall.. Anyways.. that PP looks nicer IMO ..
What I dislike at both, there is no “on the fly” adjustment on the bracelets. So for me is Rolex the more practical choice. On my glidelock I use 3 positions during the day.
No Comparison. The Patek Nautilus! Both watches were designed by Gerald Genta and therefore beautiful, but the watchmaking and build design of the Patek is far superior. Resale if you ever decide on a change is much easier and higher on the Patek. I have a Patek Nautiluc Chrono and if i sold it tomorrow it would be more than three times what i paid for it. I have a similar specification AP Royal Oak Offshore and it's resale value is less than when I bought it. Also customer support from Patek is exceptional. I recently took my wife's quartz AP into their official shop in Monaco for a battery change. No luck... They need to send it back to AP for a simple battery change and that will take two months. With this kind of customer service, I will not be buying anymore AP's.
I think your new purchase should be a Vacheron Constantin Overseas Chronograph. You have to unite the holy trinity, and its a gorgeous watch and it comes with a no tools quick release bracelet plus a leather and a rubber strap
I wouldn’t even aspire to owning any of these, but my choice is the AP. As others have mentioned, the bracelet makes up for the whole watch. Amazing how you captured the play with the light.
Great video, it’s interesting that up close I’d choose the AP, I just think from every angle it looks better, but totally appreciate the PP quality/rarity
Tough question, but yes is probably agree. I have the rose gold 41mm Royal Oak, and I just don’t think much beats that piece. Interestingly I’m also going to buy the white dial 5711.....great minds !
Love them both! I love both my 5711 and 15400. The bracelet on the 15400 is much better than nautilus. Love your videos always looking forward to them!!!
My expert conclusion is Patek is the better of the two because it comes with a bigger and nicer box! And the classy, brown velvet towel of Patek adds to the mark.
@@AY-qy4jn everyone can say anything they like, including you. Actually, every conceivable idea, no matter how weird or insane it is, there bound to be people who agree with it. So, at the end of the day, the fact remains true that your view represents you, and my views represent me, some people will agree with us, some people will not. That’s the way things are.
I’m still catching up on your vids as I’ve only recently discovered and subscribed to your channel, I like the matter of fact way you present and review really great watches and this review exemplifies that! Thanks for sharing.
Dont own a single of these watches. But couple of member in my family own one of them. In my country. The old money mid upper class people use Patek or Rolex and the new money mid upper class people use AP or Omega. I guess young people prefer flashier and sleek design. But sometimes people buy thing not because of the price but because the design reminds them of their past world. Neither one of them is better than one another. IMO in my country. At least in my family. Patek or rolex is like a Time machine to the past and while AP is to the future.
Patek is class,simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Even though the ap is more simple
Buying one of the most expensive watch which only tells time is simplicity? People don't really understand this quote...
Im talking about the design compared to the AP
no, it's not. it's just an overpriced gadget for people who have more money than they know what to do with. you're paying for the name and perceived status, nothing more.
I think the ap looks more simple tbh
For me AP is better looking, giveawey one of them 😂🤣
LOL that will prob be one of the biggest give away of youtube ever
@@zean233 Ill do youtube in a few years and Im saying only 1 thing... challenge accepted =)
Crrect
20,000$ giveaway basically
going to jeweler bust the AP yeah
Bruh, The AP is Different. Its just too cool.
"going to jeweler bust the AP yeah"
Offset _TM Going to the jeweller and fuck up my AP yeah diamonds look horrible just leave it as it is lmao
@@offset_tm4486 sliding on water like a jetski yeah (one year later, but still got that reference)
No no no im loyal to patek gang 👌🔥
@@achannelhere7276 or you can be a real baller and get frosted white gold skeleton AP with rainbow Bezel
I can’t even afford to watch this video
One day bro, start saving up 🙏🏽
ASVP NAZ That’s boss mentality right there🔥
Hahahah
Everyone can achive anything, focus on what you can really do, have passion for it and master it.
💀
I may be biased, as I own a PP; but, while I greatly respect your AP Jumbo, I love the Nautilus, and even much prefer it’s band. The contrasting polish/satin finish is stunning. Two stellar timepieces.
Naaah... you are biased. This AP bracelet is one of the most beautiful and best built bracelets ever on a watch!
I love that AP. If I had more money than I could spend I would definitely buy one. Patek Philippe is nice too but I like the AP much more.
Have always preferred wearing the Audemars however more recently I decided to buy a Patek, got to say it but I prefer the Patek. Not sure if it’s because the watch has gained popularity in the last few years but I got allot of complements when I was wearing it. Definitely worth a buy.
4K with great lighting. Your beautiful photography showed off those pieces wonderfully. Sometimes it's hard to show off watches on camera. And it's often difficult getting a good enough look at them on UA-cam. So please, keep up the good work.
I prefer the AP, but I certainy wouldn't turn away the PP, because it's a PP.
I see you like PP's
Leon Guyot I, myself am also a fan of PP’s
Not all PPs are made equal though
Ha! GAAAYYYYYY!!!
He's like his PP!
I've never been very interested in either of these watches... but this video makes them both look so beautiful.
The name AP itself manifests ...Awesome Product 👍🏻
*now I see why people love watches,the creativity and effort that goes into making one is astonishing...*
Thank you
Regardless of price and prestige, I just like the design and finish of the AP more.
Prices actually more or less the same. You would also pay at least an additional 9-10.000 for moonphase complications. Personally I think the most beatiful Royal Oak and Nautilus are the original ones without the complications. They simply distract the lines in the original design
I love these both equally. Both are stunning, and I hope to add both to my collection in the near future.
The Patek wins it for me. It's just pure class without looking as bulky as the AP, yet they weigh the same
That's a difficult pick. The PP would just take for me. Your collection to be honest is what I would like to achieve. There isn't one watch I wouldn't love to have. Your a lucky (I'm sure deserved) man. Cracking reviews keep it up
and you sir, are a very humble person :)
Both fantastic pieces. I can only dream of one day owning such an amazing watch.
I personally would prefer 5711 to 5712, but from the author's perspective, it makes sense to choose 5712. Both AP and Patek are gorgeous. True icons. Hope to have one someday.
As much as i enjoy the nautilus and how it fits on my wrist, i am not a fan of the dial layout of this particular model so I would go with the much simpler ap for this head to head..
My ideal choice between the two brands with models that have similar functions, would be the 26574
from ap. the dial is just so well executed that i could forego the power reserve function.
regardless, excellent acquisitions and videos as always.
Couldnt agreed more
Both come with really excellent boxes but Patek’s box and papers are just have an even more luxurious feel. This is why Patek is #1 and any serious collector will tell you that it doesn’t get better than Patek. Even someone like Mr. Biver who worked for AP, helped restart Blancpain and today runs Hublot is most proud of his vintage Patek collection.
So you say patek is better because of the box
The first time I saw an AP I didn't like the wristband at first but now I love it and is one of the reason why I want to buy one !
Perfect, very tastefully chosen watches to review. I love both of them
I would take the 5712, but have a lot of respect for the Jumbo, too!
The AP is just a work of art. I love that watch.
I like the fact you show the whole 'package' as it were. Boxes, papers etc and not just the watches. For my tiny wrists I'd have to go for the AP Royal Oak in 36mm. I think its discontinued now? What's your opinion between the 14790ST/O/0789ST/07 Vs. a 14790ST.OO.0789ST.10 ? Also I hear APs are a bit more delicate movement wise?
Patek wins here. Having a Nautilus is a privilege. It’s very difficult to get one and the watch movement is night and day with AP one.
For now it’s about 8-10 years of waiting list... but if you want to be on this list you must be someone. That’s why my boss bought one 5711 at 55k on gray market instead of 30.
I understood when I looked at this beauty for real. It’s the grail watch without doubt.
Chances are I wouldn't survive the waiting list.
Stainless Steel I’ll give you a tip, fly all the way to Macau and visit an AP guarantee they have it.
Great comparison. The bracelets on both really do look exquisite. I'm a bracelet fan...
Either of these watches would make me very happy. I love the bracelet on the AP but, for me it would still be the Patek. Great video as usual, I love you reviews. 👍
Both are winners for me but if it has to come down to making a choice it had to be the AP for being original and of course the bracelet is the best in the industry....
I am aware of it...AP Royal Oak was introduced in 1972 Basel world and Nautilus was introduced in 1976, four years after AP...I like them both but just feel that the AP was the one that introduced the design with Gerald Genta...I still love them both....
This is quickly becoming one of my favorite watch channels. With all those complications, I have to say, PP > AP but AP's case back is outstanding. Great review!
I've watched hundreds of watch videos. This is the first comparison I've seen of Patek and a Royal side by side. Marvelous 👏.
Recently acquired my 15400 blue dial and I will say the Royal oak bracelet is by far the best bracelet. Much better then the Nautilus bracelet which I felt was so thin and light. But I love the case height of my 5711.
This guy collects expensive as watches and here I’m with my Pokémon cards collections lmfao
There're very expensive ones out there.
Oof take this as a wake up call, grow up bro!
With these 2 timepieces it’s not a matter of which is better. It’s about which one appeals to you more.
DIal, hands = PP
Movement, backcase = PP
Bracelet = AP
Bezel = AP
.nautilus with royal oak bracelet would be ultimate.
☝️finally someone else agrees
Personally I would go with Patek as it can be both sporty and classic. I see you have reviewed more Patek than AP so guessing you're on the same side as me ;)
Also can you review A. Lange & Söhne? :D
Having worn both for a while I eventually settled on an AP 26331 (it’s basically a jumbo with a chronograph). Don’t get my wrong the 57xx series is fantastic but to me it really falls behind on the bracelet. Patek went back to using pins in the links not screws and that to me isn’t good enough on a watch like this. The Royal Oak bracelet hugs your wrist do damn well.
The 5712 may still be my grail watch and I was thinking about it......until I tried a Lange Zeitwerk. I think that might be my ultimate unicorn and I won’t have to wait years for it. The reality is, with a significant sales history I can get on a 5712 list but not on a 5711 without owning a notable Patek already
You can tell more finishing went into the PP verses the AP. That kind of distinguishes the two watches. AP for impressing folks at the upscale bar. The PP for impressing the other gentleman on the yacht.
Both are extremely beautiful! If i coult chose...i´m more in love with the Nautilus.
Patek has better packaging, but AP looks better (in my opinion)
For me it's like comparing a Ferrari (the PP) with a high-end Mercedes (the AP).
Yes, my first tendency is to go for the Ferrari, but the Mercedes would be much more practical day-to-day, less of a hassle to maintain, less expensive to service
It's good to reward ourselves sometimes . While I'm not one to spend on high-end watch (I spend too much money on travel, lol), I can appreciate your gorgeous and timeless watch. I love how it's a symbol of all your hard work.And i choose NKUWAN every time honestly
For me is ap then patek
Oh and yesterday was the first ever time I saw a ap but a person was wearing it so don't think I saw it in a jewlery store or something
AP is sportier and PP is classier. The best is to have both. I love both. But the way I dress and the way I live my life, AP is better for me. Furthermore, the way PP increased the size to 41mm with 5811/1G, today I prefer by far 16202. It has a better movement and nothing will ever beat size 39mm.
the 5712 is the winner for me and the bracelet is much more comfortable and has a higher waterproof capabilities, more complicated... much more beautiful also
AP looks more masculine
No,
Fuck yes
Greg M but the PP really melts down onto the hand...it may not look great simply sitting on a table...but it looks beautiful on the wrist
Oh yes oh no
Fun fact: the nautilus was originally designed for women. :D
Greetings,these are the two best watch brands in the world but the cleanliness of the AUDEMARS PIGUET gives me what I love to see time on a watch that wonders ,thank you for this video ,greetings from Italy bye ...
The PP dial is somewhat unbalanced.. they should have played with the position of the subdials into a 3-6-9 position configuration and it would be perfect
This could've been a really long video. Thanks for making it simple!
Gotta go with the AP, so much more versatile and smoother.
The Patek with the AP bracelet would be tremendous.
I know that Patek is amazing and beautiful in its own right, but something kept making me more attracted to that AP. Regardless both beautiful watches!
Thanks for sharing... I love the Patek design, it has a nice retro look.
Heavy hitting collection man, congrats!
The Jumbo certainly has presence but that 5712 is just something else!
Jumbo is my all time favourite,period.I don't even look at nautilus,although I know the importance of the watch and the army of admirers.First thing that puts me off is the bracelet.I can not stand polished and brushed parts together,and that goes also for the new rolex two tone bracelets,although I think the oyster is a fantastic bracelet.Nautilus is a far from bad or ugly watch,it is just Jumbo wins in my eyes,all the way.Great review of two such an iconic pieces.
always been an AP fan
Patek is in a class of its own...I started with Rolex but as I matured I appreciated the marvel that’s Patek.
Both are magnificent, If I have to choose one, I'd go for the AP
Both of them are ridiculously beautiful
I like the PP chain/bracelet and love the AP dial. Has anyone thought of mixing up luxury watches? Is it even possible? :D Then again the AP chain matches the dial so I'll give it to AP as well. I like how the iced out APs look. Does anyone even wear these watches outside or they are just for display as a collection?
What’s the retail vs market price for both those watches ? Would be nice to see a video with such details
The Royal Oak is the original creation, the Nautilus is just an inspiration/copy of the Royal Oak for Patek Philippe.
The Royal Oak has more class, look so much better and have more masculinity than the Nautilus.
The Nautilus looks like the women's version of the Royal Oak.
x)
Personally, I really love the lines of the Royal Oak as the Nautilus does me no effect and has absolutely no power of attraction on me.
(For me, it's a women's watch)
No matter what the experts may think... I don't care!
Gerald Genta himself recognized that his most beautiful creation was the Royal Oak... ;)
And even historically speaking, the AP has inspired so many creators in the industry while the PP "copy" absolutely not... Only one of them will have marked the history of his imprint.
For me, there is absolutely no match...
Both r outsTanding ..But AP is Glorious 4 mE
I'll Preper Patek , Nkt because Of its Look But Because Of Its Beautful History from 16s And A Very Good Market Value and Reputation
The 5712 is my dream watch, but in general I prefer AP, but that 5712 🤩
You have an awesome collection! Beautifull all time classic timepieces. But the prices for ap and pp are just out of this world. Dont get me wrong, those are realy nice watches but are they realy worth 30k? I mean they might cost .5 to 1k to produce. But dont get me wrong. A realy beautifull collection of classics👍🏻
It’s like the difference of going shopping at a mall or getting haute couture. There is no comparison. It’s not the “what” of it, it’s the “how”.
Those are two of the best looking watches out there! Thanks for the review.
I had an AP Royal Oak about 4 years ago .. and it just didn't click.. sold it for a small loss and got two more Rolexes instead (shrug) .. it was nice, but .. I don't know.. was just odd looking and feeling and I didn't like the clasp after wearing it for a few weeks.. I think it was around .. 20k .. but the box was different, wooden lacquered, and the manual/papers were a larger book if I recall.. Anyways.. that PP looks nicer IMO ..
Would like to see the Tissot PRX 35mm watch compared to the Nautilus 5712.
Both are stunning
What I dislike at both, there is no “on the fly” adjustment on the bracelets. So for me is Rolex the more practical choice. On my glidelock I use 3 positions during the day.
No Comparison. The Patek Nautilus! Both watches were designed by Gerald Genta and therefore beautiful, but the watchmaking and build design of the Patek is far superior. Resale if you ever decide on a change is much easier and higher on the Patek. I have a Patek Nautiluc Chrono and if i sold it tomorrow it would be more than three times what i paid for it. I have a similar specification AP Royal Oak Offshore and it's resale value is less than when I bought it. Also customer support from Patek is exceptional. I recently took my wife's quartz AP into their official shop in Monaco for a battery change. No luck... They need to send it back to AP for a simple battery change and that will take two months. With this kind of customer service, I will not be buying anymore AP's.
Thanksgiving..first time somebody shows the real weight betwen models...
That's a hitnail pecept!
Again Thanks You
I think your new purchase should be a Vacheron Constantin Overseas Chronograph. You have to unite the holy trinity, and its a gorgeous watch and it comes with a no tools quick release bracelet plus a leather and a rubber strap
Patek Philippe my favourite watches, but i think actually this design of Audemars Piguet looking more better, great watches! good video!
I prefer the Girard Perregaux Laureato over the PP and AP honestly. However i insist on stating you have a great two piece combo right there, whowww
5712 is a grail, my dream watch, I’ve never liked the 5711 or any AP’s really!
Why am I watching this video? I will never have such a watch in my life.))))))
Fantastic video, explanation, and of course watches. Just not sure you had to wear them in mid werewolf transformation...
I wouldn’t even aspire to owning any of these, but my choice is the AP. As others have mentioned, the bracelet makes up for the whole watch. Amazing how you captured the play with the light.
Great video, it’s interesting that up close I’d choose the AP, I just think from every angle it looks better, but totally appreciate the PP quality/rarity
What if they were as attainable and priced the same? Then what would you choose ? I’d choose the AP for sure!
Tough question, but yes is probably agree. I have the rose gold 41mm Royal Oak, and I just don’t think much beats that piece. Interestingly I’m also going to buy the white dial 5711.....great minds !
The AP strap is perfect !
How have I missed this video yesterday :(
Love it as usual! (haven't actually watched the video yet but i'm sure i'll love it)
Edit: Yep, I was right.
Audemars has the best finish i have ever seen on a watch.
The look on the AP is unbeatable. But the movement is a different thing.
Love them both! I love both my 5711 and 15400. The bracelet on the 15400 is much better than nautilus. Love your videos always looking forward to them!!!
My expert conclusion is Patek is the better of the two because it comes with a bigger and nicer box!
And the classy, brown velvet towel of Patek adds to the mark.
So I can say your sister is the best of women just because she comes with a bigger and nicer box?
@@AY-qy4jn everyone can say anything they like, including you. Actually, every conceivable idea, no matter how weird or insane it is, there bound to be people who agree with it.
So, at the end of the day, the fact remains true that your view represents you, and my views represent me, some people will agree with us, some people will not. That’s the way things are.
AP is by far a more classic looking watch. Hoping to have one before I clock the age of 35 which is 7 years away
I went with 15400 blue dial over the 15202 because I like the 3 hand movement better. To go with my 5711 white
The 5712 is my grail.
Both of those watches are exquisite.
Patek is much better looking...
No way. The Royal Oak was always the best looking Genta design.
Your opinion i basically wrong... AP wins
Per Hoeck lol that statement doesn’t even make sense.
@James Frankohy don't you just get em both ;D
I’m still catching up on your vids as I’ve only recently discovered and subscribed to your channel, I like the matter of fact way you present and review really great watches and this review exemplifies that! Thanks for sharing.
I love Patek 😍
For me i like AP more, its more casual and modern in my opinion.
Dont own a single of these watches. But couple of member in my family own one of them. In my country. The old money mid upper class people use Patek or Rolex and the new money mid upper class people use AP or Omega. I guess young people prefer flashier and sleek design. But sometimes people buy thing not because of the price but because the design reminds them of their past world. Neither one of them is better than one another. IMO in my country. At least in my family. Patek or rolex is like a Time machine to the past and while AP is to the future.
Two amazing watch, I prefer AP
I obviously can't afford a AP Royal Oak.
However I have a Casioak with a Mod Kit.