5700xt oc8 and everything at 100% worked. Thanks for setting it straight cause I went from 10-20fps to 50-60fps. I gotta say, this game in vr is pretty damn cool when it's clear and smooth.
I'm guessing by this statement "1.0 (100% steam resolution) x 1.0 (individual game supersampling) = 1.0 (100%)" that "steam resolution" is the 'Resolution Per Eye' in the SteamVR/General tab, and the "individual game supersampling" is the 'Custom Resolution Multiplier' in the SteamVR/Video > Per Application Video Settings. So each should be 100%, correct? I already have no stutter, very smooth, but distant objects are very fuzzy and not at all sharp. Closeup (instrument panel) looks great, tho. Which one do you recommend I adjust and in which direction? I'm very confused by a number of different terms that might mean the same thing - render scale, render resolution, pixel density, super sampling, etc. I've watched just about everything on UA-cam and I still don't understand where to set things.
Hi Steve, the easiest way to think of things is like this. Steam sets the resolution of the headset. At 100% in steam the resolution is 4K roughly speaking. If your pc can not run the G2 at 4K, reducing the percentage in steam reduces the resolution of the headset making it easier for the GPU. Super sampling in game takes the settings you have and upscales them, making the image better but adding more cost of processing on both cpu and GPU. Some people reduce the resolution of the G2 so that there system can run the headset without stutter or frame drops. Then tweak the image with SS. It’s a bit of a balancing act depending on the speed\strength of the system
I don't care what anyone says. Your advice was perfect. I can now run Assetto Corsa Competizione with no fps stuttering and no motion sickness. To me there is no visual difference between 50% and 100% for settings in VR. The biggest difference are settings in the actual game.
Thanks that means a lot. Glad you can finally enjoy this sim. As soon as I get my 5900x setup I hope to prove that the cpu is just as important as the GPU. I’m not coming from the angle of high end is best, just that IPC and single core performance as well as decent multithreading goes hand in hand with the GPU at 4K. People currently like my self who had a higher end card, with a weaker cpu, are just leaving a lot of performance on the table.
Hmmm but I am still not sure if everything is 100% correct here. I understanding the explanation, but the per eye resolution Steam sets is so much higher than 2160x2160, I can't believe that all this is necessary to make up for lens effects. I think how Steam acts here is fine and bring best quality for the other headsets, but with the G2s already high resolution it bringt most systems into trouble, even many of the better ones. Plus I can't really see that the image quality is really degrading when going down to 70%, didn't do much research below. So why don't put it down if it removes stutters and frame latency...
The figures are confirmed by Valve and HP. Lowing to 70% lowers the resolution in the headset and increases system performance. Research barrel distortion and frensal lenses and you will get more ideas. If you have dropped it to 70% and your happy, go with it. It’s your experience not ours. There is max performance and optimal, everyone’s mileage will vary.
@@HlspwnsWorld I believe, but I don't get why they tell people to not change it at all. The R2s resolution is insane (in a good and bad way ;) ) I run it on a laptop with i9 11900H, 32GB, nVidia RTX3800 16GB, SSD. I optimized everything and took care that no thermal throttling occurs. And yeah Half Life Alyx runs great in any settings. But when I run poorly optimized stuff like some Pavlov custom maps for example I still get huge fps drops. And many people even have weaker hardware. Then you need to reduce at least the per game render resolution to get it playable at all. So it would be the better way not to tell people not to touch this but give some deeper Information in which way it affects performance and quality and what to expect when changing it. Same for this Video.
@@mr.thomas7282 I work in the I.T support sector, I see on a daily basis people who have no intention of understanding a product they own, let alone solving a problem. They simply expect to be provided an instant fix\answer. Taking that general view, that’s my opinion of the internet. I really appreciate your comment, and understand what you are saying, but the more complicated you make things the more dependent people become on your support. The reason I don’t change the steam VR setting is because it’s global. You change that and every steam VR game you own changes. Now if your hardware is not quite up to the job, thats a quick way to reduce the overhead. But as you have mentioned some games run great with max performance others don’t. I always tweak settings from within games, so changes are made at a game level and not at a global level. It makes things so much easier to manage.
@@HlspwnsWorld I totally get your point. I also keep it on Auto or 100% and do adjust per game rendering solution if necessary. I think I did not express myself very good. I wanted to say after watching this Video I had the impression that changing this would not be a good ideal at all, but people with weaker hardware might still need it.
You have been asking, I can try through the lense. Not sure about FPS counter in a WMR headset. But I will do a settings video. I am going to go through all my races sims with the G2. Getting the headset so late, has left me with little time to get things done, so near to Christmas, cyberpunk 2077, and a few other things I’ve got on. If UA-cam was my day job I’d be smashing it with the videos. Sadly it’s not, so just hang in there. I’ll do PC2 this weekend
@Joel M It’s taken some trial and error, but I have finally got Project Cars 2 looking good at 4K. It’s been a faff and a trade off in frame rate, but I’ve done it. Ran out of time tonight. But I’ll get a video together tomorrow. Was worth the hassle.
A sw developer recommended me general Steam 150% (barrel Reverb G2 correction) and in ACC resolution scale 50% and SS depending on your hw CPU - GPU. works with 1080ti 2080ti 3070 3080 3080ti 3090. allows low latency without spikes, no extra load on the CPU and keeps the GPUs within 88% of the load (then depends on the graphics setting in ACC). tested on 5600x B550 1080ti 2080ti 3080 3080ti 3090. the increase in sharpness given by the Steam SS 150% is essential, as the lens controls the image quality
Interesting; but your increasing the scaled resolution and decreasing the in game resolution. The game runs without issue on the CPU, the load is on the GPU because of the VR side. I don’t really see a great return in downsampling something that’s easy to run and increasing the resolution of the bit that’s really hard to run. Just wondering how much all of this counts with AMD FX in the latest shader patch. As soon as the temperature drops I’ll do some investigation
my headset sweet spot is super easy to get into, but gets very blurry very quickly past the first 5% of my vision. These contradict eachother so I feel like the issue with the sweetspot might be something having to do with the rendering throughout the display.
@@HlspwnsWorld actually i run steam ss 200 steam acc 28 that gives me 2996x2932 136% mid SS to the lenses and cover the barrel of G2. Than i run also DSR 1.5x 33%. than in Acc Res scale is 70% and pixel density 190% with extra 130% sharpness. This combo gives me clarity in far field over 200 mt
But your last video helps me to avoids stuttering in DCS in the sound too. Before your video I let Steam VR at 100% for DCS and 1 in the super sampling DCS's settings. And after your video I put DCS at 50% and the DCS's super sampling at 1.5. After that no more big stuttering and a clear sound without interruptions. So, I think it depends of softwares and we must try each one to see what is the best setup for each games.
You're absolutely right, some games have unbearable performance drops at the native g2 resolution steam (100%). My method is to leave the steam resolution setting at 100%. If I need to 'under-sample' a game for a boost in performance, I can just edit the super-sampling multiplier within steam for that particular title only. The default setting for the individual titles is at 100%. So overall; 1.0 (100% steam resolution) x 1.0 (individual game supersampling) = 1.0 (100%) Under-sampling for performance I would only change the individual game setting; 1.0 (100% steam resolution) x 0.5 (individual game SS) = 0.5 (50%) That way you can keep the higher resolution across the board for your collection & conveniently keep a tailored setting for titles in which you require more performance - at the expense of resolution. This way you can capitalise on the native g2 resolution by default instead of always having it at 50% across the board.
So the HP recommended graphics card to be able to use at full resolution is minimum GTX 1080 or similar... yet at 100% people with 30 series cards are reporting terrible performance.... Is the reality that HPs recommended graphics cards is really nonsense??
@@AdamShinwell I have a 1070 and no problem at all with reprojection. Maybe when planes are very close to me, due to the speed, there's a phantom image, but, that's all. After for the new GPU, it's on the Nvidia's side. Probably a driver problem.
@@AdamShinwell yes doing that, I have the same quality I had before. 100% Steam VR and 1 in DCS super sampling, and now the same quality but with a nice sound 50% steam VR and 1.5 DCS super sampling. I can go to 1.7 to have better little texts sharpen, but I did a compromise on both. Because 1070 ^^
@@ericveschi4904 You run at 100%? I have a 1080ti but running as an external GPU to a laptop (in a Razer external case) and have really bad frame drops at 100% but i'm hoping this is down to the eGPU setup (throttling due to Thunderbolt connection to the GPU). I have ordered the parts for a new standalone PC (delivered this week), new everything apart from GPU as I'm hoping I can still get some good use out of the 1080ti. Will find out hopefully this week when it arrives!
I have no experience of the pimax. The G2 is starting to deliver, but it’s certainly a headset where you have to tweak the game settings to get it looking just right.
@@HlspwnsWorld Yes, I normally do high super sampling at around 150 to 200 depending on what game your playing..also depends on what graphics card you have..so my rule of thumb is high steam vr Super Sampling and lower game settings yes you could go the other route with 100 percent resolution in Super Sampling and higher settings in game..butt I seem to run into some dropped fps and stuttering in doing that..my 2080 super gives me a draw line in Steam Vr that hits right on 150 Super Sampling..I plan on getting a 3080 in the future, so I can get a good stable vr game experience..I use Valve index as my HMD I truly look forward to getting 144 hz at 150-200 SS and keeping my settings at high or medium..that's all I want..I don't want Ultra settings at 200 SS because I would be lucky to get 90 fps ..no thank you..please let me know your thoughts 👍
@@HlspwnsWorld With my valve index i have my SS to 280% for dcs, i use a 1080ti i just have to deal with 30fps so i can read the text, i am planning on buying a g2 when they are in stock
nobody cares about your Valve Index, this is about the Reverb G2 which has much higher resolution than yours, so whatever you do doesn't have anything to do with this.
I think this is still not right...hp need to address this asap ,if u go into steam vr u can change what 100% means...its so confusing,,if you go into the reverb menu with the contriller and change setting s it changes what res 100% is
buy FPSVR on Steam and look the value Steam SS % that is generated by steam general rex x steam per app. ex: 200x28=56% of total Steam VR..but the general work on lenses the per app works by give the resolution to VR headset
Thanks for the info, now i would like share my pc spec and my experience with reverb g2. I7 9700k rtx 3080TI 32gb ram 3600. Steam vr at 100% its imposible play with 60fps with PC2,ACC,Automobilista 2, even ET2. Depends of players ...youll decided play smooth or at 30 or less fps at 100% rescale.thrust me my pc its olny for games. Oh i preffer dont say nothing about fs2020 xP ...sad..but...now its like this... i preffer play smoth in vr. if someone have idea how play with 100% scale and minimum 60fps please...let us know peace!!
I would check your thermals to make sure your not getting too hot 🥵 I’d also run a decent virus and malware scanner. Something is not right with your claims 🤣
@@HlspwnsWorld yeah, I thought with a rtx 3080ti could play 100% scale in steam vr and not everything in ultra.. But... Even minimums settings for example in DCS the game crash... 😅 Aah... Yeah maybe next or next of next generation gpu😂
Your CPU is not bad, but I would go with something with more Cores and Threads, especially for simulators. TBH not sure if a 3080 TI would be held back by your CPU. I9 9900K or newer I9 would be better.
It’s down to the power of your CPU or GPU, but even with a RTX 3090 people are having to change either scaling or in game settings. We do not have graphics cards that can max a G2 yet. We maybe 2 generations away from that atm
@@HlspwnsWorld completely agree. i think i will stay on G2 for years to come. still trying to find the sweet spot. i think for my PC (i7-8700k, 32Gb ram, RTX 3070) it's around 66-70% without changing any in game settings to the games i play (DCS, iRacing).
@@gregkar2736 Nice system. Have you considered upgrading your cpu and mobo? Or do you find that your cpu is still not held back? Genuinely interested as I feel my 1700x is holding me back in frame rate
@@HlspwnsWorld i think i7-8700k is still ok i have OC it at 5.0ghz though. I am at 100% now in iracing and 50% in DCS. still trying to dial it in, but nvidia drivers are absiluteley trash these days, giving VR users a hard time
@@gregkar2736 I’m still waiting for my 5900x to be delivered (On a pre order waiting list), I’m begging to get fed up of waiting, if Intel became available with good yields I may switch as I’m now entering the 4th month of waiting
5700xt oc8 and everything at 100% worked. Thanks for setting it straight cause I went from 10-20fps to 50-60fps.
I gotta say, this game in vr is pretty damn cool when it's clear and smooth.
I'm guessing by this statement "1.0 (100% steam resolution) x 1.0 (individual game supersampling) = 1.0 (100%)" that "steam resolution" is the 'Resolution Per Eye' in the SteamVR/General tab, and the "individual game supersampling" is the 'Custom Resolution Multiplier' in the SteamVR/Video > Per Application Video Settings.
So each should be 100%, correct? I already have no stutter, very smooth, but distant objects are very fuzzy and not at all sharp. Closeup (instrument panel) looks great, tho. Which one do you recommend I adjust and in which direction?
I'm very confused by a number of different terms that might mean the same thing - render scale, render resolution, pixel density, super sampling, etc. I've watched just about everything on UA-cam and I still don't understand where to set things.
Hi Steve, the easiest way to think of things is like this. Steam sets the resolution of the headset. At 100% in steam the resolution is 4K roughly speaking. If your pc can not run the G2 at 4K, reducing the percentage in steam reduces the resolution of the headset making it easier for the GPU.
Super sampling in game takes the settings you have and upscales them, making the image better but adding more cost of processing on both cpu and GPU.
Some people reduce the resolution of the G2 so that there system can run the headset without stutter or frame drops. Then tweak the image with SS. It’s a bit of a balancing act depending on the speed\strength of the system
@@HlspwnsWorld This makes a lot of sense, finally! Thanks for this explanation!
Thank god someone is finally doing it right!
I don't care what anyone says. Your advice was perfect. I can now run Assetto Corsa Competizione with no fps stuttering and no motion sickness. To me there is no visual difference between 50% and 100% for settings in VR. The biggest difference are settings in the actual game.
Thanks that means a lot. Glad you can finally enjoy this sim. As soon as I get my 5900x setup I hope to prove that the cpu is just as important as the GPU. I’m not coming from the angle of high end is best, just that IPC and single core performance as well as decent multithreading goes hand in hand with the GPU at 4K. People currently like my self who had a higher end card, with a weaker cpu, are just leaving a lot of performance on the table.
There's something wrong with your eyes if you can't tell the difference between 50% and 100% in Steam VR.
@@Coxy-b34 it’s a massive difference. I have to supersample in game setting up to 1.7 to make 50 percent good
Hmmm but I am still not sure if everything is 100% correct here.
I understanding the explanation, but the per eye resolution Steam sets is so much higher than 2160x2160, I can't believe that all this is necessary to make up for lens effects.
I think how Steam acts here is fine and bring best quality for the other headsets, but with the G2s already high resolution it bringt most systems into trouble, even many of the better ones.
Plus I can't really see that the image quality is really degrading when going down to 70%, didn't do much research below. So why don't put it down if it removes stutters and frame latency...
The figures are confirmed by Valve and HP. Lowing to 70% lowers the resolution in the headset and increases system performance.
Research barrel distortion and frensal lenses and you will get more ideas.
If you have dropped it to 70% and your happy, go with it. It’s your experience not ours. There is max performance and optimal, everyone’s mileage will vary.
@@HlspwnsWorld I believe, but I don't get why they tell people to not change it at all.
The R2s resolution is insane (in a good and bad way ;) ) I run it on a laptop with i9 11900H, 32GB, nVidia RTX3800 16GB, SSD. I optimized everything and took care that no thermal throttling occurs. And yeah Half Life Alyx runs great in any settings. But when I run poorly optimized stuff like some Pavlov custom maps for example I still get huge fps drops. And many people even have weaker hardware. Then you need to reduce at least the per game render resolution to get it playable at all.
So it would be the better way not to tell people not to touch this but give some deeper Information in which way it affects performance and quality and what to expect when changing it. Same for this Video.
@@mr.thomas7282 I work in the I.T support sector, I see on a daily basis people who have no intention of understanding a product they own, let alone solving a problem. They simply expect to be provided an instant fix\answer.
Taking that general view, that’s my opinion of the internet. I really appreciate your comment, and understand what you are saying, but the more complicated you make things the more dependent people become on your support.
The reason I don’t change the steam VR setting is because it’s global. You change that and every steam VR game you own changes. Now if your hardware is not quite up to the job, thats a quick way to reduce the overhead.
But as you have mentioned some games run great with max performance others don’t.
I always tweak settings from within games, so changes are made at a game level and not at a global level. It makes things so much easier to manage.
@@HlspwnsWorld I totally get your point. I also keep it on Auto or 100% and do adjust per game rendering solution if necessary. I think I did not express myself very good. I wanted to say after watching this Video I had the impression that changing this would not be a good ideal at all, but people with weaker hardware might still need it.
Please I need a project cars 2 through the lense with fps counter and settings 🙏❤️
You have been asking, I can try through the lense. Not sure about FPS counter in a WMR headset. But I will do a settings video. I am going to go through all my races sims with the G2. Getting the headset so late, has left me with little time to get things done, so near to Christmas, cyberpunk 2077, and a few other things I’ve got on. If UA-cam was my day job I’d be smashing it with the videos. Sadly it’s not, so just hang in there. I’ll do PC2 this weekend
Also recording WMR is a lot more challenging than it was with the Oculus
@Joel M It’s taken some trial and error, but I have finally got Project Cars 2 looking good at 4K. It’s been a faff and a trade off in frame rate, but I’ve done it. Ran out of time tonight. But I’ll get a video together tomorrow. Was worth the hassle.
@@HlspwnsWorld thank you so much can't wait 🙏❤️
@@HlspwnsWorld did u may have a upload time for me? 🙏
A sw developer recommended me general Steam 150% (barrel Reverb G2 correction) and in ACC resolution scale 50% and SS depending on your hw CPU - GPU. works with 1080ti 2080ti 3070 3080 3080ti 3090.
allows low latency without spikes, no extra load on the CPU and keeps the GPUs within 88% of the load (then depends on the graphics setting in ACC). tested on 5600x B550 1080ti 2080ti 3080 3080ti 3090. the increase in sharpness given by the Steam SS 150% is essential, as the lens controls the image quality
Interesting; but your increasing the scaled resolution and decreasing the in game resolution. The game runs without issue on the CPU, the load is on the GPU because of the VR side.
I don’t really see a great return in downsampling something that’s easy to run and increasing the resolution of the bit that’s really hard to run.
Just wondering how much all of this counts with AMD FX in the latest shader patch. As soon as the temperature drops I’ll do some investigation
does setting the SS to 150% in steam actually solve the sweetspot problem?
my headset sweet spot is super easy to get into, but gets very blurry very quickly past the first 5% of my vision. These contradict eachother so I feel like the issue with the sweetspot might be something having to do with the rendering throughout the display.
@@beanos2287 the 150% resolve the barrel, not the sweetspot. that's phisically an hw spot created by the lens themselves. better lenses better spot
@@HlspwnsWorld actually i run steam ss 200 steam acc 28 that gives me 2996x2932 136% mid SS to the lenses and cover the barrel of G2. Than i run also DSR 1.5x 33%. than in Acc Res scale is 70% and pixel density 190% with extra 130% sharpness. This combo gives me clarity in far field over 200 mt
Everyone was messaging me, I didn't believe them, so I checked on onlin, didn't belibe that, so I messaged people on Twitter.
But your last video helps me to avoids stuttering in DCS in the sound too. Before your video I let Steam VR at 100% for DCS and 1 in the super sampling DCS's settings.
And after your video I put DCS at 50% and the DCS's super sampling at 1.5.
After that no more big stuttering and a clear sound without interruptions.
So, I think it depends of softwares and we must try each one to see what is the best setup for each games.
You're absolutely right, some games have unbearable performance drops at the native g2 resolution steam (100%).
My method is to leave the steam resolution setting at 100%. If I need to 'under-sample' a game for a boost in performance, I can just edit the super-sampling multiplier within steam for that particular title only.
The default setting for the individual titles is at 100%. So overall;
1.0 (100% steam resolution) x 1.0 (individual game supersampling) = 1.0 (100%)
Under-sampling for performance I would only change the individual game setting;
1.0 (100% steam resolution) x 0.5 (individual game SS) = 0.5 (50%)
That way you can keep the higher resolution across the board for your collection & conveniently keep a tailored setting for titles in which you require more performance - at the expense of resolution.
This way you can capitalise on the native g2 resolution by default instead of always having it at 50% across the board.
So the HP recommended graphics card to be able to use at full resolution is minimum GTX 1080 or similar... yet at 100% people with 30 series cards are reporting terrible performance.... Is the reality that HPs recommended graphics cards is really nonsense??
@@AdamShinwell I have a 1070 and no problem at all with reprojection. Maybe when planes are very close to me, due to the speed, there's a phantom image, but, that's all. After for the new GPU, it's on the Nvidia's side. Probably a driver problem.
@@AdamShinwell yes doing that, I have the same quality I had before.
100% Steam VR and 1 in DCS super sampling, and now the same quality but with a nice sound 50% steam VR and 1.5 DCS super sampling. I can go to 1.7 to have better little texts sharpen, but I did a compromise on both. Because 1070 ^^
@@ericveschi4904 You run at 100%? I have a 1080ti but running as an external GPU to a laptop (in a Razer external case) and have really bad frame drops at 100% but i'm hoping this is down to the eGPU setup (throttling due to Thunderbolt connection to the GPU). I have ordered the parts for a new standalone PC (delivered this week), new everything apart from GPU as I'm hoping I can still get some good use out of the 1080ti. Will find out hopefully this week when it arrives!
pimax 8kx or g2?
I have no experience of the pimax. The G2 is starting to deliver, but it’s certainly a headset where you have to tweak the game settings to get it looking just right.
I normally leave steam vr at 150 percent with Valve index..and games that have super sampling I don't touch..
That’s quite an up sample, but if it works, it saves any messing around.
@@HlspwnsWorld Yes, I normally do high super sampling at around 150 to 200 depending on what game your playing..also depends on what graphics card you have..so my rule of thumb is high steam vr Super Sampling and lower game settings yes you could go the other route with 100 percent resolution in Super Sampling and higher settings in game..butt I seem to run into some dropped fps and stuttering in doing that..my 2080 super gives me a draw line in Steam Vr that hits right on 150 Super Sampling..I plan on getting a 3080 in the future, so I can get a good stable vr game experience..I use Valve index as my HMD I truly look forward to getting 144 hz at 150-200 SS and keeping my settings at high or medium..that's all I want..I don't want Ultra settings at 200 SS because I would be lucky to get 90 fps ..no thank you..please let me know your thoughts 👍
@@HlspwnsWorld With my valve index i have my SS to 280% for dcs, i use a 1080ti i just have to deal with 30fps so i can read the text, i am planning on buying a g2 when they are in stock
nobody cares about your Valve Index, this is about the Reverb G2 which has much higher resolution than yours, so whatever you do doesn't have anything to do with this.
I think this is still not right...hp need to address this asap
,if u go into steam vr u can change what 100% means...its so confusing,,if you go into the reverb menu with the contriller and change setting s it changes what res 100% is
buy FPSVR on Steam and look the value Steam SS % that is generated by steam general rex x steam per app. ex: 200x28=56% of total Steam VR..but the general work on lenses the per app works by give the resolution to VR headset
Thanks for the info, now i would like share my pc spec and my experience with reverb g2.
I7 9700k rtx 3080TI 32gb ram 3600.
Steam vr at 100% its imposible play with 60fps with PC2,ACC,Automobilista 2, even ET2.
Depends of players ...youll decided play smooth or at 30 or less fps at 100% rescale.thrust me my pc its olny for games.
Oh i preffer dont say nothing about fs2020 xP
...sad..but...now its like this...
i preffer play smoth in vr.
if someone have idea how play with 100% scale and minimum 60fps please...let us know
peace!!
I would check your thermals to make sure your not getting too hot 🥵
I’d also run a decent virus and malware scanner. Something is not right with your claims 🤣
Oh to play 100% with max settings at 4K in VR please wait for the next next gen GPU 🤪
@@HlspwnsWorld lol😜
@@HlspwnsWorld yeah, I thought with a rtx 3080ti could play 100% scale in steam vr and not everything in ultra.. But... Even minimums settings for example in DCS the game crash... 😅
Aah... Yeah maybe next or next of next generation gpu😂
Your CPU is not bad, but I would go with something with more Cores and Threads, especially for simulators. TBH not sure if a 3080 TI would be held back by your CPU. I9 9900K or newer I9 would be better.
100% is impossible. it's just impossible, i run it at 72% and it's perfect (RTX 3070)
It’s down to the power of your CPU or GPU, but even with a RTX 3090 people are having to change either scaling or in game settings. We do not have graphics cards that can max a G2 yet. We maybe 2 generations away from that atm
@@HlspwnsWorld completely agree. i think i will stay on G2 for years to come. still trying to find the sweet spot. i think for my PC (i7-8700k, 32Gb ram, RTX 3070) it's around 66-70% without changing any in game settings to the games i play (DCS, iRacing).
@@gregkar2736 Nice system. Have you considered upgrading your cpu and mobo? Or do you find that your cpu is still not held back? Genuinely interested as I feel my 1700x is holding me back in frame rate
@@HlspwnsWorld i think i7-8700k is still ok i have OC it at 5.0ghz though.
I am at 100% now in iracing and 50% in DCS. still trying to dial it in, but nvidia drivers are absiluteley trash these days, giving VR users a hard time
@@gregkar2736 I’m still waiting for my 5900x to be delivered (On a pre order waiting list), I’m begging to get fed up of waiting, if Intel became available with good yields I may switch as I’m now entering the 4th month of waiting