Not in the back, you don't want kids hitting an emergency stop button on the motorway! However I thought the law was you had to have someone in the driver's seat and paying attention, so why is he in the back by himself?
"We are all a part of this human experiment." I'm not a lab rat. How dare anyone experiment in a public space exposing others to the dangers of a 'futurist's' wet dream.
The fact that the support person knew instantly he was in a parking lot without the guy having to divulge that first tells you everything you need to know.
My question is, if he's always helping people, why are these big corporations always attacking them? What did Elon Musk ever do to them? Is it because of competition, corporations and companies? I have no clue. Competition's pretty big then good luck.
Yes, because media-hyperbolised anecdotal evidence beats statistics (of accidents caused by human drivers for example) every time. That's how you do science, kids! Btw, psychology students, here's your textbook example of availability bias :)
I dont know why but the Waymo mishaps are absolutely hilarious to me, i was laughing so hard watching the video of Waymo cars all the sudden starting honking at each other in the middle of the night waking people up in San Francisco when that video came out.
If you were in an accident, will you support banning cars? It's not a rational response. As long as autonomous is safer than human drivers, it should be legal. Why is it expected to be perfect?
Yes, let’s ignore all the countless good experiences and only count the bad ones. With that logic, all technology shouldn’t be supported since they sometimes don’t work. Planes sometimes crash - I guess we should ban air travel?
You're basically sharing the road with a load of learner drivers who are completely unsupervised. Plus, they're owned by a large private company, which we all should know by now can't always be held accountable.
Lol that's a dumb takeaway. This had nothing to do with the type of motor in the vehicle. If it had been a driverless car with a traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) instead, would you claim you'd never get into an ICE vehicle again? Ridiculous.
@@kscar363 Read to understand before reacting…dude doesn’t like EVs and dislikes driverless ones even more, nothing dump with someone having that opinion, infact it’s a popular one.
@@kscar363 Actually, it's called an informed decision, based on fact. You should really read up on lithium and where the minerals come from, before insulting those of us who do know. K...thx buh-bye now!
well good then theyll have more money for all the lawsuits they are going to have to pay when humans end up injured. Do you know theyre trying to do this stupid crap with semis too? Yeah just ask the strip mining CEO of Boeing what happens when you worry about your pocket book before people. Lives are lost. How many people have to die or get hurt before people pull their heads out their rear ends and just accept that some things just can not be trusted to be done by anything other than a human being who can react. Stop any computer commanding or prompting of any transportation vehicles. Who engineers any system for an airplane that pushes the nose down ? Ever? Never for any reason, stretch of imagination, under the sun should pilots have to fight to keep their airplanes from nose dives. Nothing on any machine should be programmed to be computer commanded. That is just... Cmon people. Damn.
Give me a human being any day. I love talking to the drivers from all over the world in my city. Technology ain’t all it’s cracked up to be. Make some tech to fix world hunger or something like that please.
This is seriously hallarious 😂 I have felt the same way in life with people and that’s even with a driver in the taxi never mind with a driverless car 😂
This is the reason that Airplanes always need human pilots. Becuse eveyone with any common sence would not trust a autopilot without a fail safe to override the autopilot.
the car said can u press the stop journy button on the APP and he didnt say no he said well cant you so he knew he could stop the car but diddnt and potentialy put people in danger as soon as he lookd at the app
bbc, were one of many options in list of destinations was - take me for a spin? or did he jump out of window and kick that immigrant engineer who programs them?
Came here to see if they had posted the news of the vote where Labour voted AGAINST having an inquiry into UK grooming gangs. A vote that Labour voted against. It's one of the biggest issues in the UK, but good old BBC have things like this instead. I am 50, and for the past 20 years, I have kept an eye on politics/news more closely. Yes, both sides have bias, but even I am shocked that a party would vote against something that has affected 1000s of people in the past and 1000s more now. Labour really is sickening, even more than I thought they would be.
Fun fact: there have ALREADY been enquiries and their findings will be being implimented into new legislastion..... .......buuuuuuut, if there is yet _another_ enquiry then any new legislation would then not be put forward until after that next enquiry. You are _laughably_ ignorant and, as a result, so very, very, _veeeeeeeeerry_ easily led around by the right wing. 😅 You didn't even know that their had, again, ALREADY been multiple enquiries. Lol, look at you trying to act out your fake pearl-clutching. 😅
Didn't the Tories also vote against an inquiry years ago? And not implement any changes one of the previous inquiries suggested years ago also? I noticed Labour has implemented a change the inquiry suggested, that people who know of said grooming activity and do not report it could be criminally charged, I am sure you are also aware of this in your studies.
@@mrmrgaming Fun fact: there have ALREADY been enquiries and their findings will be being implimented into new legislastion..... .......buuuuuuut, if there is yet _another_ enquiry then any new legislation would then not be put forward until after that next enquiry. You are _laughably_ ignorant and, as a result, so very, very, _veeeeeeeeerry_ easily led around by the right wing. 😅 You didn't even know that their had, again, ALREADY been multiple enquiries. Lol, look at you trying to act out your fake pearl-clutching. 😅
What about the grooming of the thousands of white girls? What about Robinson who brought this all to light and is now in an isolation cell in a maximum security prison for publishing his documentary of the grooming?
"We hope you enjoyed the ride" -Johnny Cab
“Sue me, d*ckhead”
LOL.
Think if you fell a sleep and woke up hours later and the taxi hadnt left the parking lot 😅
I swr it happened to me on the circle line in london when I was a kid and fell asleep
Can't he stop the car? What if the car catches fire, is he trapped inside? No emergency button?
Exactly
Not in the back, you don't want kids hitting an emergency stop button on the motorway! However I thought the law was you had to have someone in the driver's seat and paying attention, so why is he in the back by himself?
You waived your right to health and safety when you got in that vehicle.
@tomr200199
It's impolite to sit in the front of a taxi. AI has feelings too.
He could just jump in the front and apply brakes 😂
"We are all a part of this human experiment."
I'm not a lab rat.
How dare anyone experiment in a public space exposing others to the dangers of a 'futurist's' wet dream.
i am.. lol.. at a study atm .
I don't want to be exposed to your dangerous human driving.
Welcome to America
The fact that the support person knew instantly he was in a parking lot without the guy having to divulge that first tells you everything you need to know.
Wait till Elon's taxi steers you into an oncoming truck.
💯💯💯💯💯
My question is, if he's always helping people, why are these big corporations always attacking them? What did Elon Musk ever do to them? Is it because of competition, corporations and companies? I have no clue. Competition's pretty big then good luck.
100% people will be kidnapped in one of these things
@@simpletown323 But on the other side, technically if all cars became autonomous, all car jackings and road rage incidents will stop wouldn't they?
@@darylring898 No, 👎
Who in their right mind gets into one of these.
I don't believe this guy....it looks like setup use case IT guy
Yes, because media-hyperbolised anecdotal evidence beats statistics (of accidents caused by human drivers for example) every time. That's how you do science, kids!
Btw, psychology students, here's your textbook example of availability bias :)
Not many with right minds left in this world….
@@robertchmielecki2580incredibly well said
2:08 wtf news anchor 😂😂
Surely you were like ×UUGHHR× 😂
I dont know why but the Waymo mishaps are absolutely hilarious to me, i was laughing so hard watching the video of Waymo cars all the sudden starting honking at each other in the middle of the night waking people up in San Francisco when that video came out.
Why does a driverless car have a steering wheel? Are there mints and a comb in the glovebox too?
lol
Isnt there some kind of manual override ? My claustrophobia couldn't handle this
Seriously, he still supports this nonsense after going through that. Some people need a harsher experience to learn their lesson.
Ok boomer.
If you were in an accident, will you support banning cars? It's not a rational response. As long as autonomous is safer than human drivers, it should be legal. Why is it expected to be perfect?
Yes, let’s ignore all the countless good experiences and only count the bad ones. With that logic, all technology shouldn’t be supported since they sometimes don’t work. Planes sometimes crash - I guess we should ban air travel?
cry about it. Waymo is great its new tech so few bugs are normal but it does not have caused any accidents
You're basically sharing the road with a load of learner drivers who are completely unsupervised. Plus, they're owned by a large private company, which we all should know by now can't always be held accountable.
The freaky truth: AVs are being tested on public roads, with no external signal in many cases, and no emergency escape button for passenger. Strange!
Human test dummies😂
Future is twisted 😂
I don't believe this guy....it looks like setup ---- use case IT guy
Tesla: We do a little trolling
Is this AI's form of road rage?!?
I'd never get into an EV, let alone a driverless EV posing as a taxi!
Lol that's a dumb takeaway. This had nothing to do with the type of motor in the vehicle. If it had been a driverless car with a traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) instead, would you claim you'd never get into an ICE vehicle again? Ridiculous.
@@kscar363 Read to understand before reacting…dude doesn’t like EVs and dislikes driverless ones even more, nothing dump with someone having that opinion, infact it’s a popular one.
@@kscar363 Actually, it's called an informed decision, based on fact. You should really read up on lithium and where the minerals come from, before insulting those of us who do know. K...thx buh-bye now!
This is what happens when you try to humans obsolete
Why TF are these cars allowed on the road? I thought the technology was no where near ready yet. Another 10 years maybe.
Why is a taxi driving without a human behind the wheel?
They ran out of pedos?
So you don’t have to pay some bloke to drive?
Many such taxis in China. No driver.
And it won't move if you don't buckled up.
well good then theyll have more money for all the lawsuits they are going to have to pay when humans end up injured. Do you know theyre trying to do this stupid crap with semis too? Yeah just ask the strip mining CEO of Boeing what happens when you worry about your pocket book before people. Lives are lost. How many people have to die or get hurt before people pull their heads out their rear ends and just accept that some things just can not be trusted to be done by anything other than a human being who can react. Stop any computer commanding or prompting of any transportation vehicles. Who engineers any system for an airplane that pushes the nose down ? Ever? Never for any reason, stretch of imagination, under the sun should pilots have to fight to keep their airplanes from nose dives. Nothing on any machine should be programmed to be computer commanded. That is just... Cmon people. Damn.
@@wdp7128 and drives straight into buildings and lorries and many get ahhhhhhhh...squished
Self-Driving = Not Even Once
Could this anchor ask any more pointless questions than she did?
Have you seen the driverless bicycle
🤣🤣🤣
People are silly using this sort of vehicle 😅
No music. Here. Circles by Atlantic Starr.
Give me a human being any day. I love talking to the drivers from all over the world in my city. Technology ain’t all it’s cracked up to be. Make some tech to fix world hunger or something like that please.
This technology is still new. It's bound to have bugs.
"Jane, stop this crazy thing." - The Jetsons
Human invention has not been without flaws!
Legend has it his plane made by Space X, is now spinning uncontrollably in circles.
Is it Brakeless, as well? Why not hop over into the driver side and take control??
lol you are kidding, right?
Wow! The things the BBC will report on to avoid having to talk about what everyone else is talking about. Shouldn't be surprised really
Driverless cars. The key word is DriverLESS!!!
"THE CAR 🚗 MOVIE 🎥 2025 😂😅😂 EDITION"
❤🇬🇧❤
😂😂😂 You're only a part of this experiment if you're willing to get in!!! 😂😂😂
There is a stop button.
He didn't press it to make a story for Instagram hits.
this is good journalism! I hope the make a documentary about it
If he just yelled out STOP! What would have happened?
Robots have feelings too I guess.
Mike Jones, Mike Jones, four fours I'm tipping.
THIS IS IT.
All this so you can't get a job as a driver.
What was this introduction... please, I can't bare this level of embarrassment...
This is seriously hallarious 😂 I have felt the same way in life with people and that’s even with a driver in the taxi never mind with a driverless car 😂
Suddenly that one joke from Good Burger 2 became real
'Welcome to JohnnyCab ! Have a nice day !!'.
The machines are trying to say Somthing lol
Anyone who trusts a self drive car is living on cloud cookoo land.
That's what happens you ride the top british and indian engineered Jaguar
If these things decide there is a bridge over a river when there isn't is there anything you can do about it or do you just have to drown?
This is the reason that Airplanes always need human pilots.
Becuse eveyone with any common sence would not trust a autopilot without a fail safe to override the autopilot.
This is not funny, but...
Bad Johnny cab 😂
Gains grounds verses stands ground being pole position
Still drives better than most of us.
these garbage cars are death traps
Why did he get into this death trap in the first place!?!? Use your head buddy!
the car said can u press the stop journy button on the APP and he didnt say no he said well cant you so he knew he could stop the car but diddnt and potentialy put people in danger as soon as he lookd at the app
"Glitch." Kinda like the Glitch with ED-209
Not a tight circle so no sickness
Other road users are paying for the experience if it bugs out, has an accident etc too.
Funny but ridiculous that these are allowed on the roads. They constantly demonstrate that they are far from ready
Why didn’t he just stop the car?
We see what you’re doing BBC.
Why do we need self driving cars?
We don't. We never have done and we don't now.
3:40 when the elevator breaks it's also a human experiment
incredible.
Diesel forever ♥️
bbc, were one of many options in list of destinations was - take me for a spin? or did he jump out of window and kick that immigrant engineer who programs them?
Hmmm... the BBC are staying very quiet on *the grooming gang scandal.*
I wonder why? 🤔🤔🤔
Stop hijacking comments with irrelevant spam posts 🤮🤬
And the MPs and BBC ARE addressing it.
Over at Sky comments are off on the subject.
They literally posted a vid on the subject an hour before this one.
Shut up, u fool.
Cyberdine test run
Yo let my boy Supahotfire out
amazing नेपालमा नेताले घुमाउँछ। जनतालाई यता कारले
Imagine if Musk got into one of his cars and it drove straight into the Pacific. Imagine, go on, imagine. Oh deep joy.
imagine a lorry coming straight at you and you can't escape...these garbage cars are death traps
The think is looking for parking, choose driverless take away someone’s job
Ai Car doing donuts? Not good
next thing you know it’s shoplifting
Driverless cars don't need to be perfect, they just heed to be safer than human drivers which is a very low standard.
But I'm thinking is that safe? The glitch was to go in circles, what if the glitch was to drive into traffic? Nope not for me yet.
Control , Alt, Delete 😅
Putin must to feel the same ......regardless to Ukraine
2:08 ...
2:09 😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Welcome to Johnny Cab...
AI's gonna drive us mad.....
bootloop
How is this suicide mission even allowed .. a lot of people will die trying all this driverless woke craziness
How is this "woke???"
What is woke?
@@simpletown323it’s “woke” for dumb people like that who are unable to wake up and understand what’s going on around them 🤣
@@simpletown323 maybe because they didn't reject a black passenger...
Lol🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂
It reminds me about the story written by Woody Allen where he makes enemies with all tech things and a talking elevator won’t let him out!
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 Timothy 3:1
Came here to see if they had posted the news of the vote where Labour voted AGAINST having an inquiry into UK grooming gangs. A vote that Labour voted against. It's one of the biggest issues in the UK, but good old BBC have things like this instead.
I am 50, and for the past 20 years, I have kept an eye on politics/news more closely. Yes, both sides have bias, but even I am shocked that a party would vote against something that has affected 1000s of people in the past and 1000s more now. Labour really is sickening, even more than I thought they would be.
Fun fact: there have ALREADY been enquiries and their findings will be being implimented into new legislastion.....
.......buuuuuuut, if there is yet _another_ enquiry then any new legislation would then not be put forward until after that next enquiry.
You are _laughably_ ignorant and, as a result, so very, very, _veeeeeeeeerry_ easily led around by the right wing. 😅
You didn't even know that their had, again, ALREADY been multiple enquiries.
Lol, look at you trying to act out your fake pearl-clutching.
😅
Didn't the Tories also vote against an inquiry years ago? And not implement any changes one of the previous inquiries suggested years ago also? I noticed Labour has implemented a change the inquiry suggested, that people who know of said grooming activity and do not report it could be criminally charged, I am sure you are also aware of this in your studies.
Go watch Parliament this morning. Badenoch is your problem, trying to block the CHILD PROTECTION BILL. Uninformed comments make us all sick!
ua-cam.com/users/livec2YONFjchOs
@@mrmrgaming Fun fact: there have ALREADY been enquiries and their findings will be being implimented into new legislastion.....
.......buuuuuuut, if there is yet _another_ enquiry then any new legislation would then not be put forward until after that next enquiry.
You are _laughably_ ignorant and, as a result, so very, very, _veeeeeeeeerry_ easily led around by the right wing. 😅
You didn't even know that their had, again, ALREADY been multiple enquiries.
Lol, look at you trying to act out your fake pearl-clutching.
😅
What about the grooming of the thousands of white girls?
What about Robinson who brought this all to light and is now in an isolation cell in a maximum security prison for publishing his documentary of the grooming?
They are not going to anything, such shameful on his own people.
What fool would get in a driverless car…Would fools be so venturing to ride pilotless aeroplanes or trains?🤨🥱🥸
trains are already driverless. Auto pilot is already there and it is getting better and betterd
😂