I have found only beanies fit us sadly and even then it’s kinda hard… Some don’t stretch enough, some are too tight and hurt (even after stretching so you have to super stretch) and designs get messed up
Thing is fossil record shows phyla came first the complete opposite of an evolutionary model. It cannot exist from that fact alone as it's the total reverse of biological progression under that model and even further we have less phyla now than in the past a second critical blow.
Thing is fossil record totally refutes a common descent narrative pigeonholed on this work because we see phyla coming first not last, and less phyla now than in the past. Two critical blows.
We already know about a few other species of the homo genus, aka human species. We were never the only one. We're just the last surviving one. And we did coexist with a few of them, it must have been exciting to meet other species very much like us. Some even interbred, so I guess it truly was "exciting" loll
A thing is, is how it's constructed. Einstein ( yes I'm using that example) had an average size brain but had many more neuronal connections than average. Yet, and I'm also going with some possibilities, there's also problems like learned helplessness. Where a person becomes dependent on some other for permission to do anything. Including on what to think about. So, nature and nurture, right. Right.
We've though that Denisovans were likely a species complex rather than a specific species, and since we have no type fossil Denisovans don't have a scientific binomial, so if they finally do get one it's likely going to be the name of one of these Chinese fossil ones. However, we don't have any genetic assessments of H. longi, H. juluensis, or any of the other human fossils from China. Right now some folks are slotting Denisovans in under the H. juluensis group and making some other splits for Chinese fossils, but I suspect that when the dust settles what we will have is a Denisovan complex that includes H. longi, H. juluensis, and others in bboth East and SE Asia. We need genetic assessments and we need more fossils preserving diagnostic features.
We have little to work with on Denisovans which is why they don't have a species name beside us trying to be careful especially with little evidence... at best they maybe a subspecies of H. sapiens no different than Neanderthals. It all comes down to us not being so quick to jump to it's a new species and to say it's a species complex is iffy itself since it clear indicator they were at best a subspecies of us because we find matching genetics within individuals from the Mongolian region
Maybe it's just a guy with a big head. I had a two classmates in high school who had massive heads. If archeologists find their remains 7000 years from now. They'll also think they're a different species. Because those heads were massive. And they were perfectly normal. No health defects or anything
"Big Head" and "Long" do seems kindof obvious physical traits to catecorize by, just like pygmis. Way better than the attempts to group us by colour, these definitions leave room for a larger variation.
Having larger brains does not automatically mean: having a greater intellect. There's also the complexity of any brain to consider. Large brains with a lower complexity than smaller brains could still mean that Homo Juluensis was not smarter than Homo Sapiens and/or Homo Neanderthalensis, possibly even less. Also consider the fact that we have never dug up any other technologically advanced civilization than our own, which is not much older than than 6500 years or so (before that, we were nomadic hunter-gatherers).
Interesting findings, as Prof Stringer said, whether it can actually be called a new species might need more research but the more fossils we find the better - certainly sounds like an unusually large group of hominids that I didn’t know anything about
Not sure what you are talking about. Science has ruled out common descent. Humans aren't from any apes or other hominids. Modern humans aren't even genetically from homo sapiens 10 000+ years ago! Let that one sink in. It's all still a mystery.
@@Richard-pd7rp The natural record refutes the evolutionary models' sequence of taxonomic rank progression with phyla coming first, the total reverse of sequence(in the avalon and cambrian explosion). More so on top of that with close to double the amount of phyla then vs now totally counter to the evolutionary models progression of increase.
Part of the issue here is that what defines a species doesn't seem to be well defined at least to the public. I know the definitions I learned in school aren't being applied in at least some cases.
These other Homo lineages probably had another take on spoken language than us. My theory is that because spoken language could only have been taught to children and peers with the teacher being fully aware of what language is, spoken language therefore must have won OUR ANCESTOR'S hearts UNANIMOUSLY because they understood that spoken language was a way to 1. consciously advance beyond the original, societal structure (wherein the alpha male doesn't have enough time to help everyone, and we all have a lot of problems that need to be addressed by professionals, nobody is specialized as a doctor or any other specialist, and luck is a big contributor to success, and people stole from each other so that "token economies" can't be said to have solved any problems) by ensuring, beyond all doubt, that in the future we would be able to hold criminal trials with appeals, so that "power" would be centralized in the appellate court; 2. to begin evolving in a different way than animals & never be able to "look back" on the previous "age" ever again, so that eating meat is no longer controversial and it can be concluded that there is a difference between Man and Animal. This all ties in with the Chinese view that Humankind originated in China because China has the oldest fossils (A 300,000-year record, if I'm remembering correctly). Russia, India, and some African entities make the same claim, with timelines in the same order of magnitude. The dominating theory is that Homo Sapiens began in Africa, went to Asia, and then went back to Africa. One thing is clear: we shouldn't expect it to be easy to propose such archaeological concepts without first defining "sociocultural" modes of advancement, such as spoken language (specifically, spoken language which differs from that of other animals). ~~~~~ Medically, our lineage has determined that autism is associated with larger brains and too many neurons. This is why we can't comprehend these larger brains in archaeological finds. Do you have anything to contribute that could help us? If you think it's a misleading BBC video spreading Chinese ethnocentricism, then what will you do when you find out about the BBC's take on Africa? Why does the Chinese man have the same voice as me?
@@Tool683 It gets even more interesting with 'Ring species'. Imagine a group of crabs who live on one part of a lake, over thousands of years, they slowly scuttle clockwise around the lake, leaving groups of crabs behind as they keep circling the lake. Eventually, the circle completes, and the crabs that complete the circle stand next to crabs that never left. Now, these returned crabs cannot interbreed with the crabs that never left (now a different species (cannot interbreed)). However, they can breed with the crabs 2 miles counter clockwise, who can likewise breed with the crabs 2 more miles counter clockwise, all the way around the lake to complete the circle. That's a ring species, where potentially crab 'A' cannot breed with crab 'C', but Crab 'A' can breed with crab 'B', who can in turn have offspring that can breed with crab 'C'. It can all get rather messy, potentially.
@@Tool683Agree. Considering polar and brown bears can interbreed (and have done hybridised to produce modern polar bears) that definition can’t always faithfully be applied. Especially not to plants.
@@Tool683breeding is often not the problem, having fertile offspring is. But this so-called biological species concept is flawed, there are lizards that reproduce through parthenogenesis for example. Not to mention all the single celled organisms that just do mitosis to reproduce. You're better off combining several species concepts
@@athmaid Sometimes group A can have fertile offspring with group B, B with C but not A and C. This is called a "ring-species" (calling it chain species would be more accurate imo).Also, two groups could be on the verge of speciation, so some combinations of individuals can still have fertile offspring while others can't. This may or may not have been the case with other human "species" we interbred with, which could explain the dominance of the homo sapiens. Parthenogenesis doesn't contradict the definition of species, though. No fertile offspring has been conceived with a non-member of the species. I would only use the term "species" for animals. Plants are way more versatile when it comes to hybridization and bacteria are completely different. They can release and adsorb DNA fragments from unrelated groups, for example, making their evolution even more non-linear.
Yes, if they don’t actually have DNA from these skulls and they never found a Denisovan skull yet then it’s possible that these Chinese skulls are Denisovans
Denisovans were another species of our genus homo. There were a few "human" species coexisting at some point. They all died out, sadly. We're the only ones left.
Homo - Homo antecessor Homo - Homo denisova Homo - Homo erectus Homo - Homo egaster Homo - Homo floresiensis Homo - Homo habilis Homo - Homo heidelbergensis Homo - Homo juliensis Homo - Homo longi Homo - Homo luzonensis Homo - Homo naledi Homo - Homo neanderthalensis Homo - Homo nesher ramla Homo - Homo rudolfensis Homo - Homo sapien
Chris Stringer is pointing out that these fossils would be better grouped with another group of Chinese or Asian fossils (Homo longi, perhaps Homo sapiens longi), not European fossils, but the edition make it seems like the other researcher is replying to a suggestion that Stringer lumped these Chinese fossils with European ones.
I'm always suspicious of drawing conclusions from a single characteristic like skull size. A quick glance at humans today shows people have wildly different sized heads with no obvious differences in cognition.
I think it's more to do with the shape of the skull, of course while people have different sized skulls today, the shape of all the skulls remains the exact same.
I wondered that also, like when they only have 1 example...imagine if the find Andre the Giants remains in a thousands years...they wouldn't say he was a normal human
Possibly. The odds are tiny though. It’s hard enough to get a fossil. But to get a fossil of that singular human with a freakishly large head? Seems pretty unlikely…
Having larger brains does not automatically mean: having a greater intellect. There's also the complexity of any brain to consider. Large brains with a lower complexity than smaller brains could still mean that Homo Juluensis was not smarter than Homo Sapiens and/or Homo Neanderthalensis, possibly even less. */edit:* Also consider the fact that we have never dug up any other technologically advanced civilization than our own, which is not much older than 6500 years or so (before that, we were nomadic hunter-gatherers).
"Having larger brains does not automatically mean: having greater intellect." You just described the current human species. Humanity is older than 6,500 years, which means you're an EEC? LMAOOOOOO!
Being intelligent is an obvious advantage in many situations. But not all. Having a big brain requires lots of energy, makes birth more dangerous because of the bigger baby head. So it might actually be a disadvantage in some places.
The larger brain size of Neanderthals was uncontroversially correlated to their larger body mass , how a cranial capacity of 1700 can be made to fit this model is unclear- how big were these guys?
Right. As much as the creationists complain, they must admit, the fellow anthropologists will critique harder with actual evidence. That’s how science is supposed to work and how it builds on itself over time.
@@CountJeffula Why would creationists care? Genetic testing has shown humans are not related to even homo sapiens past like 10 000 years ago. Fossil record has fully refuted common descent theory with phyla coming first not last, and less phyla now than in the past second major critical blow. Encode project proved humans have over 100 folder higher mutation rate per generation than allowed for a evolution narrative. List goes on and on.
@@CountJeffula Creationists care? Genetic testing has shown humans are not related to even homo sapiens past like 10 000 years ago. Fossil record has fully refuted common descent theory with phyla coming first not last, and less phyla now than in the past second major critical blow. Encode project proved humans have over 100 folder higher mutation rate per generation than allowed for a evolution narrative.
@@CountJeffula They care? Genetic testing has shown modern humans not related to homo sapiens past around 10 000 years. Fossil record fully refuted common descent with phyla first not last, and less phyla now than in past two critical blows. Encode project proved humans have over 100 fold higher mutation rate/generation than allowed for a evolution explanation.
@@CountJeffula Huh? Genetic testing shown> modern humans not related to homo sapiens past around 10 000 years. Fossil record refutes common descent> phyla first not last/less phyla now than in past two critical blows. Encode project>humans have 100 fold higher mutation rate a generation than allowed for a evolution explanation.
300,000 years ago! Larger brain makes them very interesting to me too! Ironic that a person with a smaller brain is defining a person with more brain size!
Larger brains are not always associated with more intelligence. That extra brain matter could be used for something other than thinking. For example, it is thought that the extra matter in the Neanderthal brain was devoted to visual processing, so maybe they were better at spotting animals in camouflage or something.
This is extremely premature. And to absorb Denisovans into the umbrella of Juluensis makes absolutely zero sense. All of this is absurd to change the entire paradigm over a few skull fragments. RIDICULOUS.
Of course it’s ridiculous. Follow the money and the people doing this. These people don’t have proof… they simply WANT it to be true so they write the history for themselves and hope nobody looks into it.
Even if they were more intelligent it could be that their brain required too much energy in relation to their available diet causing the cost to outweigh the benefit. It could be that early humans were the right amount of intelligent and efficient that we were able to improve our intelligence while our brains became more efficient rather than larger.
Your logic would assume that taller people have the capacity for greater intelligence than short people based on cranial capacity. You should study biology and spend less time reading comic books.
@Cobbido By the way. Elephants have a higher brain to body size ratio than humans. So do hippopotamus' and certain whales. You should spend less time lying. It's not a sign of "intelligence"
Its either a lost species of ape, or it's a nephilim hybrid. They wonder why they only find one of these "missing link"s, it's because there aren't more than one. Fallen angels mixed with human females created a unique nephilim child, some enormous and some smaller like humans. Also, there weren't two of each species on the ark, there were up to seven of each "kind". Larger apes could have perished as smaller apes were saved to reproduce. It seems like most of the smaller breed of the animals were saved. Wooly mammoth, wooly rhino, they were before the flood, those two didn't make it on the ark but other rhino and elephant "kind"s did. Even many dinosaurs made it on the ark, there are stories as far back as Alexander the great talking about dinosaurs in caves, stories from the Amazon and Congo, being the only habitable places that large dinosaurs could live, ofc preserved on the ark as eggs. Who knows what the variety of animals looked like before the flood, there were definitely more of each kind. There were probably twenty different kinds of tigers and lions but only some were saved. Its amazing how much the bengal and siberian tiger look alike, just different colors. Almost everything with larger tusks was left behind, like sabertooth tiger. It's amazing that there are dinosaur graveyards where thousands of dinosaurs were buried together like they were all caught off guard by the same flood. Some even have human bones lower in the sediment than dinosaur bones, and other places have foot prints and dinosaur prints formed at the same time when humans are supposed to be millions of years later than dinosaurs. Soon enough people will start paying attention to the Bible and seeing that it is our history. Even in Genesis it talks about the ocean opening up which you could only see the deep sea rift that was created, only been able to be seen a couple of hundred years ago, yet it was written about 4500 years ago in the Bible. One single landmass, Pangea where they all lived until the tectonic plates shifted and separated the land.
No, in fact, our brains have stopped getting bigger when childbirth became a serious cause of death, because of the baby head size. That's why our babies are born so small and weak, they're premature, so the head can get through We finish our development after being born. That's when our heads grow to freakishly large sizes lol.
Theres no evidence modern Humans brains are more powerful than ancient Humans, only smaller. A more relevant comparision is the smaller brains of dogs compared to wolves, the domesticated animal losing brain function it no longer needs. And dont equate technological level with intelligence, it follows its own curve. The Romans were just as smart as us, they didnt have smartphones.
These are not the ancestors of modern East Asian people. Modern East Asians came from the out-of-Africa migration that happened about 70,000 years ago. DNA proves this. This species lived in Asia 300,000 years ago. Also East Asians are a little bit mixed with Neanderthals like other non African people. But we haven’t found other species DNA in East Asians that could have been this new species. So it probably died out before the ancestors of East Asians got there.
Most of the hominid fossils we find in caves are the remnants of predators feeding upon them. Many have telltale marks from the teeth of leopards, bears, lions & other species that ate their pray in, or near caves, giving us the misguided impression that our early ancestors lived in caves.
Heard a theory years ago that Polynesian and some other Asian people come from a different line of genetic history. Maybe this has something to do with that? Interesting. So it's looking like Africa isn't the begin. We are still trying to figure that one out. Heard stories coming from Europe too. Mountain ranges around Turkey and Croatia they have found other very old humanoid skeletons.
There have been questions raised about the accuracy of Chinese fossil records because the government of that country tends to use them to push its own idea of Chinese superiority. Not sure where these fossils fall in regard to those controversies, but this video clip is missing *a lot* of relevant information. Since I haven’t seen these ideas put forward by the big players in the field, I take the claims in this video with a very big pinch of salt.
One should always remain sceptical, particularly about Chinese 'superiority', or any other political entity's claim. However, I don't think that criticism applies these days - perhaps it did 20 yrs ago. A lot of the relevant information you want can be found via the *links* in the Wikipedia article for Homo juluensis where both parties to this ^^^ discussion have produced papers
The CCP did encourage their scientists to investigate that possibility , but quietened down when the answer came back that no significant genetic differences could be identified and conceded that we are all one species.If recovery of Mitochondrial DNA is possible from their fossil specimens one could expect them to try and resurrect that idea for nationalist political reasons
Medically, our lineage has determined that autism is associated with larger brains and too many neurons. This is why we can't comprehend these larger brains in archaeological finds. Do you have anything to contribute that could help us? Who are the big players in the field? It's fascinating. You've become so defensive all of a sudden. Maybe we should measure your cranial capacity. You're clearly lying about there being big players in the field who are ALSO as defensive about this as you are. If you think it's a misleading BBC video spreading Chinese ethnocentricism, then what will you do when you find out about the BBC's take on Africa? Stop tempting me to make "your mom" jokes and break the law in order to ruin your lineage's future. The devil is clearly protecting you from me
Like white Europeans didn’t do the same thing? Dude, they tried to prove white people were more evolved due to skull size and shape than people of African descent - because racism.
@@theKingsAmbassadorsthat’s how thick you are, we didn’t come from an ape, we developed similarly on our own branch . Get educated and you’ll understand.
Whether or not it's a different species, it's Fascinating to find a variety of diverse fossils! It will also be fascinating to learn when and how they went extinct, since modern humans were in those areas for 10's of thousands of years longer than they were in the glacier locked regions of western europe 🤔
That's not enough to define this as a different species.. there is variation within a species and there is no genetic evidence saying this is a different species... we have to be careful with saying it's totally different, if they could interbreed with us and make fertile offspring that's a clear indication they are not a different species... subspecies at best. It's why Denisovans don't have a species name is because we're at least somewhat learning a lesson in classification
I always wonder what archeologists in the future would think if they found the remains of Shaquille O'Neal next to Kevin Hart? Im.sure they'd think they were two different species!!
No they wouldn't. It's not just about size. The whole skeleton is taken into account. The ratio between different body parts is important. Both Shaq and Hart have a similar ratio of arm to leg length, or upper arm to forearm, or upper leg to lower leg, or limb to torso, etc. Like, neither KH's and Shaq's arms hang down to the ground like other apes. Both their arms hang down to the same place on their body. Teeth and skull shape are very important too.
So this species disappears 50,000 years ago and Neanderthal disappears 45,000 years ago, different parts of the world. What happened to them, to the Denisovans?
"The world is changed. I feel it in the water. I feel it in the Earth. I smell it in the air. Much that once was is lost. For none now live who remember it."
@@szikszaylevi4909 Are you not aware of their views? They believe the Bible is literal, and as such reject evolution and always try to explain things by rejecting any and all evidence that would suggest otherwise, which includes rejecting that there's any connection between modern humans and other hominids. And regularly say things like "the fossils are too partial, it wasn't a human, but some ape" , or things like "apes and humans are completely distinct , no connection whatsoever. God created them separately" and such. They have programs, movies, youtube channels, museums, universities etc. that systematically try to twist, mis-interpret, mis-represent, straw man or straight out reject any facts and findings that challenges their literal interpretation of the Bible.
Meanwhile they are covering up the studies done on the Peru Mummies that are a completely differnt species all together and have now been proven to be 100% real organic specimens
East asian are good at business South Asian are good tech Southeast asian are good at social studies Yeah we asians are built different 😅 @@rossmcleod7983
Medically, our lineage has determined that autism is associated with large brains with too many neurons. This is why we can't comprehend these larger brains. Do you have anything to contribute to us that might help us?
Maybe the huge headed human species died out because of the difficulty during birth, and our species survived by evolving just as high intelligence but in a smaller brain🧠💨👍
I have allways read that neanderthal have 1600 cc. brains. So the difference isn't that extreme. And they seem to have lived in the same period. Perhaps we should look at them more as variation within a species.
lol where? Modern science has proven the reverse of what you just said. No common descent phyla came first, and more phyla in past than now. Modern humans not even genetically related to homo sapiens of the past. ENCODE projected proved human generational mutation rate over 100 fold too high. Discovery of DNA, finite start to universe, fine tuned universe, no naturalistic origin of life and the rationality of the mind we all use all require a God. The science has never been more against your position in all of human history.
what is even more ironic is your position is the one of magic, probability producing consistently rational outcomes is the definition of magic. God creating is mind. Mind>magic
lol where? Modern science has proven the reverse of what you just said. No common descent phyla came first, and more phyla in past than now. Modern humans not even genetically related to homo sapiens of the past.
ENCODE projected proved human generational mutation rate over 100 fold too high. Discovery of DNA, finite start to universe, fine tuned universe, no naturalistic origin of life and the rationality of the mind we all use all require a God. The science has never been more against your position in all of human history.
@ Humans share a remarkable amount of DNA with modern apes, highlighting our close evolutionary relationship. Among our closest relatives are chimpanzees and bonobos, with whom we share approximately 98-99% of our DNA. This similarity is not surprising, given that our lineages diverged only about 5-7 million years ago. Chimpanzees and bonobos are genetically equidistant to humans, and the small genetic differences between us contribute to the distinct traits, such as higher cognitive abilities and complex language, that define humans. Moving slightly further in our evolutionary tree, humans share about 98% of their DNA with gorillas. While gorillas are more distantly related to us compared to chimpanzees, they still exhibit behaviors and social structures that bear similarities to human societies. Gorillas, like us, have intricate family bonds and can even use tools, although their cognitive abilities are less developed than those of humans or chimpanzees. Orangutans, found in Southeast Asia, are among the more distant of the great apes in terms of shared DNA. Humans share about 96.9-97% of their DNA with orangutans. Despite this greater genetic distance, orangutans exhibit impressive problem-solving skills and complex behaviors. Their solitary nature and unique adaptations to arboreal life make them distinct from both humans and African apes. These high percentages of shared DNA emphasize the evolutionary connections between humans and modern apes. The differences, though relatively small in genetic terms, have led to the vast diversity in anatomy, behavior, and cognition that separates us today. Explain the above and why your sky wizard "made" all the various hominids?
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
No, I didn't die out. I'm right here and I still can't find a hat that fits.
😂😂😂
You win the comment section, my dude
👍👌💖
Signed, Trump
I have found only beanies fit us sadly and even then it’s kinda hard…
Some don’t stretch enough, some are too tight and hurt (even after stretching so you have to super stretch) and designs get messed up
same
We got new "ancient human species" before GTA 6
Jajajaja
@@EveryAmerican1459 LMAO
cringe GTA 6 comment
Cousin! Let’s go bowling!
😂😂😂😂
I call BS man, how would they know these guys were homos, maybe they just worked out together or something
Took me too long to get that...
😂😂
Most childish comment so far. Youve certainly got a lot of evolving to do.
You da real mvp
@GaryV-p3h
There's always an 8 year-old in the mix.
We’re finding more fossils. We’re gonna find out a lot more differences. Exciting times!
Reanimated mammoths would be exciting , this is interesting
Thing is fossil record shows phyla came first the complete opposite of an evolutionary model. It cannot exist from that fact alone as it's the total reverse of biological progression under that model and even further we have less phyla now than in the past a second critical blow.
Thing is fossil record totally refutes a common descent narrative pigeonholed on this work because we see phyla coming first not last, and less phyla now than in the past. Two critical blows.
Not really. Just evidence of more variation before modern humans emerged. Still fascinating and a great addition to humanity's knowledge though.
We already know about a few other species of the homo genus, aka human species. We were never the only one. We're just the last surviving one. And we did coexist with a few of them, it must have been exciting to meet other species very much like us. Some even interbred, so I guess it truly was "exciting" loll
"It's not how big it is, it's how you use it." -Homo Juluensis female, probably*
A thing is, is how it's constructed. Einstein ( yes I'm using that example) had an average size brain but had many more neuronal connections than average. Yet, and I'm also going with some possibilities, there's also problems like learned helplessness. Where a person becomes dependent on some other for permission to do anything. Including on what to think about.
So, nature and nurture, right. Right.
Problably, yeh.
And she would be absolutely correct.
@@spulwassersounds like she’s accustomed to below average 😂
It’s not the size of the spear but the luck with which you chuck it.
We've though that Denisovans were likely a species complex rather than a specific species, and since we have no type fossil Denisovans don't have a scientific binomial, so if they finally do get one it's likely going to be the name of one of these Chinese fossil ones. However, we don't have any genetic assessments of H. longi, H. juluensis, or any of the other human fossils from China.
Right now some folks are slotting Denisovans in under the H. juluensis group and making some other splits for Chinese fossils, but I suspect that when the dust settles what we will have is a Denisovan complex that includes H. longi, H. juluensis, and others in bboth East and SE Asia.
We need genetic assessments and we need more fossils preserving diagnostic features.
Amazing.
We have little to work with on Denisovans which is why they don't have a species name beside us trying to be careful especially with little evidence... at best they maybe a subspecies of H. sapiens no different than Neanderthals. It all comes down to us not being so quick to jump to it's a new species and to say it's a species complex is iffy itself since it clear indicator they were at best a subspecies of us because we find matching genetics within individuals from the Mongolian region
Maybe it's just a guy with a big head. I had a two classmates in high school who had massive heads. If archeologists find their remains 7000 years from now. They'll also think they're a different species. Because those heads were massive. And they were perfectly normal. No health defects or anything
😂
We had one of those guys in our class too. We nicknamed him "Spacey" b/c his head had a lot of space in it and it looked like an astronaut's helmet.
correct
Their poor moms--ow!
Theo,,,,, is that you?
"look at the big brains on this guy "
W Wording
"Big Head" and "Long" do seems kindof obvious physical traits to catecorize by, just like pygmis. Way better than the attempts to group us by colour, these definitions leave room for a larger variation.
Named Brad
They are covering up the nazca mummy's case. This is lame in comparison
Having larger brains does not automatically mean: having a greater intellect. There's also the complexity of any brain to consider. Large brains with a lower complexity than smaller brains could still mean that Homo Juluensis was not smarter than Homo Sapiens and/or Homo Neanderthalensis, possibly even less.
Also consider the fact that we have never dug up any other technologically advanced civilization than our own, which is not much older than than 6500 years or so (before that, we were nomadic hunter-gatherers).
Interesting findings, as Prof Stringer said, whether it can actually be called a new species might need more research but the more fossils we find the better - certainly sounds like an unusually large group of hominids that I didn’t know anything about
Did you know about the Paracus skulls?
It is not science. Beliefs are religion, not science.
Such an Amazing find! Prehistory continues to show that the human family tree is much more diverse than previously thought. 💀
Not sure what you are talking about. Science has ruled out common descent. Humans aren't from any apes or other hominids. Modern humans aren't even genetically from homo sapiens 10 000+ years ago! Let that one sink in. It's all still a mystery.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 😮! For true!? Where can I find more information please? And thank you 🙏
@@Richard-pd7rp Which?
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep This bit about modern humans not having descended from other hominids. I've not heard that one before.
@@Richard-pd7rp The natural record refutes the evolutionary models' sequence of taxonomic rank progression with phyla coming first, the total reverse of sequence(in the avalon and cambrian explosion). More so on top of that with close to double the amount of phyla then vs now totally counter to the evolutionary models progression of increase.
Looking forward to more about these exciting finds. We stand on broad shoulders.
You talking about Homo Broadshoulderensis?
Yes we are, now u can be satisfied
Haha, I like that
Check out the Paracus skulls.
💯💯
I can hear the voice of Dr Banjo from futurama disputing this
🤓🤓😅😅
But no one has found the missing link...
hoho! I've got you now, "professor"!
364 of them are MPs in the British House of Commons - all of them a day or two short of a full year.
The juvenile with the tiny brain and tiny hands is currently president-elect of the USA.
Part of the issue here is that what defines a species doesn't seem to be well defined at least to the public. I know the definitions I learned in school aren't being applied in at least some cases.
These other Homo lineages probably had another take on spoken language than us.
My theory is that because spoken language could only have been taught to children and peers with the teacher being fully aware of what language is, spoken language therefore must have won OUR ANCESTOR'S hearts UNANIMOUSLY because they understood that spoken language was a way to 1. consciously advance beyond the original, societal structure (wherein the alpha male doesn't have enough time to help everyone, and we all have a lot of problems that need to be addressed by professionals, nobody is specialized as a doctor or any other specialist, and luck is a big contributor to success, and people stole from each other so that "token economies" can't be said to have solved any problems) by ensuring, beyond all doubt, that in the future we would be able to hold criminal trials with appeals, so that "power" would be centralized in the appellate court; 2. to begin evolving in a different way than animals & never be able to "look back" on the previous "age" ever again, so that eating meat is no longer controversial and it can be concluded that there is a difference between Man and Animal.
This all ties in with the Chinese view that Humankind originated in China because China has the oldest fossils (A 300,000-year record, if I'm remembering correctly). Russia, India, and some African entities make the same claim, with timelines in the same order of magnitude. The dominating theory is that Homo Sapiens began in Africa, went to Asia, and then went back to Africa.
One thing is clear: we shouldn't expect it to be easy to propose such archaeological concepts without first defining "sociocultural" modes of advancement, such as spoken language (specifically, spoken language which differs from that of other animals).
~~~~~
Medically, our lineage has determined that autism is associated with larger brains and too many neurons. This is why we can't comprehend these larger brains in archaeological finds. Do you have anything to contribute that could help us?
If you think it's a misleading BBC video spreading Chinese ethnocentricism, then what will you do when you find out about the BBC's take on Africa?
Why does the Chinese man have the same voice as me?
@@Tool683 It gets even more interesting with 'Ring species'. Imagine a group of crabs who live on one part of a lake, over thousands of years, they slowly scuttle clockwise around the lake, leaving groups of crabs behind as they keep circling the lake. Eventually, the circle completes, and the crabs that complete the circle stand next to crabs that never left. Now, these returned crabs cannot interbreed with the crabs that never left (now a different species (cannot interbreed)). However, they can breed with the crabs 2 miles counter clockwise, who can likewise breed with the crabs 2 more miles counter clockwise, all the way around the lake to complete the circle. That's a ring species, where potentially crab 'A' cannot breed with crab 'C', but Crab 'A' can breed with crab 'B', who can in turn have offspring that can breed with crab 'C'. It can all get rather messy, potentially.
@@Tool683Agree. Considering polar and brown bears can interbreed (and have done hybridised to produce modern polar bears) that definition can’t always faithfully be applied. Especially not to plants.
@@Tool683breeding is often not the problem, having fertile offspring is. But this so-called biological species concept is flawed, there are lizards that reproduce through parthenogenesis for example. Not to mention all the single celled organisms that just do mitosis to reproduce. You're better off combining several species concepts
@@athmaid Sometimes group A can have fertile offspring with group B, B with C but not A and C. This is called a "ring-species" (calling it chain species would be more accurate imo).Also, two groups could be on the verge of speciation, so some combinations of individuals can still have fertile offspring while others can't. This may or may not have been the case with other human "species" we interbred with, which could explain the dominance of the homo sapiens. Parthenogenesis doesn't contradict the definition of species, though. No fertile offspring has been conceived with a non-member of the species.
I would only use the term "species" for animals. Plants are way more versatile when it comes to hybridization and bacteria are completely different. They can release and adsorb DNA fragments from unrelated groups, for example, making their evolution even more non-linear.
Don't expect annoying background music from a serious news channel!
The BBC hasn't been a serious broadcaster in a very long time. They're far too busy covering for kiddie fiddlers and tax avoiders.
I rather enjoyed it but I get you.
I wonder if they're Denisovans, really up to the experts to figure that out.
Probably a subspecies of Homo erectus.
Yes, if they don’t actually have DNA from these skulls and they never found a Denisovan skull yet then it’s possible that these Chinese skulls are Denisovans
What kind of hips did the females have to be able to bear those babies ???
Good point.
Great point, could you find female fossils that have larger hips?
Hip side doesn’t matter as much as pelvic opening
Many women died during childbirth.
what about how big their vaginas were 😂😂
Only 15,000 years ago?!? WOW
Beavis & Butt-head left the channel
Ngl, feels nice and weird at the same time to hear what seems like Singaporean accent on BBC.
There was a kid at my school who was definitely the missing link….
No word on how Denisovan's fit into this scheme?
Denisovans were another species of our genus homo. There were a few "human" species coexisting at some point. They all died out, sadly. We're the only ones left.
"A sniper's dream" comes to my mind...
🤣🤣🤣
The species died out after John Wick's great-grandfather was born
Homogary Cheeseman
😂 for slingshots.
😂😂😂😂
Honestly looks exactly like my anatomy
I think Arnold may fall into this category. Probably Tony Robins too. They both have enormous heads.
Tony Robbins descended from Guy Smiley, the gameshow host muppet on Sesame Street.
The jaws on that dude was enormous.
@@mtrest4 😁😁🤣🤣🤣🤣 Guy Smiley's character was wasted on kids it's such an adult humor character. But yes, I see the resemblance!
@@mtrest4
FYI, T.R. has a medical condition: look it up.
COME WITH ME IF YOU DONT WANT TO LIVE
@@iole96792 they often put some humor in just for the adults in the room!
YOU HAD ME AT POSSIBLE!!!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Most likely, when the dust settles, they'll all be renamed Homo Denisovanis.
I hope so.
Homo sapiens Denisovanis
@@neomatrix4412 *yes.*
Homo - Homo antecessor
Homo - Homo denisova
Homo - Homo erectus
Homo - Homo egaster
Homo - Homo floresiensis
Homo - Homo habilis
Homo - Homo heidelbergensis
Homo - Homo juliensis
Homo - Homo longi
Homo - Homo luzonensis
Homo - Homo naledi
Homo - Homo neanderthalensis
Homo - Homo nesher ramla
Homo - Homo rudolfensis
Homo - Homo sapien
@@21LAZgoo Homo sapiens Neanderthals
I saw one in Wetherspoons..
Chris Stringer is pointing out that these fossils would be better grouped with another group of Chinese or Asian fossils (Homo longi, perhaps Homo sapiens longi), not European fossils, but the edition make it seems like the other researcher is replying to a suggestion that Stringer lumped these Chinese fossils with European ones.
Chris Stringer!!!! Legend- I saw him give a lecture at the Natural History Museum years ago- he is amazing ❤
I'm always suspicious of drawing conclusions from a single characteristic like skull size. A quick glance at humans today shows people have wildly different sized heads with no obvious differences in cognition.
Shhh...they don't want to hear that logic and commonsense.
I think it's more to do with the shape of the skull, of course while people have different sized skulls today, the shape of all the skulls remains the exact same.
@@tricksor6589 Apes are apes, humans are humans, simple. Each was created for its purpose.
@@theKingsAmbassadorsyou're one to talk about logic and common sense 😂😂
@@athmaid And you believe, Absolute Nothing created Everything...
Seems like the human family tree is more of a bush.
I'm not saying they were giants but, they were giants.
It couldn't be just one guy that happened to have a big head? I'm just asking... I was told there are no stupid questions.... 🤪🤪
I wondered that also, like when they only have 1 example...imagine if the find Andre the Giants remains in a thousands years...they wouldn't say he was a normal human
@@011keepers Exactly! 👍👍
@@Tool683 😊 Thank you! And it makes more sense now that I understand there are more than just one skull. It's all fascinating!
Possibly. The odds are tiny though. It’s hard enough to get a fossil. But to get a fossil of that singular human with a freakishly large head? Seems pretty unlikely…
Having larger brains does not automatically mean: having a greater intellect. There's also the complexity of any brain to consider. Large brains with a lower complexity than smaller brains could still mean that Homo Juluensis was not smarter than Homo Sapiens and/or Homo Neanderthalensis, possibly even less.
*/edit:* Also consider the fact that we have never dug up any other technologically advanced civilization than our own, which is not much older than 6500 years or so (before that, we were nomadic hunter-gatherers).
"Having larger brains does not automatically mean: having greater intellect." You just described the current human species. Humanity is older than 6,500 years, which means you're an EEC? LMAOOOOOO!
@@simplylethul You should re-read my comment a bit more carefully ;-)
@JohnStopman no need to, our current species is pretty fcking dumb for being the "most intelligent" creature on this planet.
@@simplylethul 364 such specimens in the British House of Commons... living fossils.
Being intelligent is an obvious advantage in many situations. But not all. Having a big brain requires lots of energy, makes birth more dangerous because of the bigger baby head. So it might actually be a disadvantage in some places.
Interesting, I’ve discovered a new species myself, in this comment section. Now, regarding cranial capacity…. 🤣
Could this be the elusive debisovan? I hope so!
Definitely
They found ancient Harry Maguire.
The larger brain size of Neanderthals was uncontroversially correlated to their larger body mass , how a cranial capacity of 1700 can be made to fit this model is unclear- how big were these guys?
really big, like 2.3 meters on average
Where the hell did you get 2.3m from
@@athmaid go read the article, not just some half ased youtube video
Coming from a guy who has to buy hats from stores specifically for big heads, these must be my ancestors 😂.
Well, by declaring a new species, they certainly have set themselves up for a ton of peer review. But keep going. Love science!
Right. As much as the creationists complain, they must admit, the fellow anthropologists will critique harder with actual evidence. That’s how science is supposed to work and how it builds on itself over time.
@@CountJeffula Why would creationists care? Genetic testing has shown humans are not related to even homo sapiens past like 10 000 years ago. Fossil record has fully refuted common descent theory with phyla coming first not last, and less phyla now than in the past second major critical blow. Encode project proved humans have over 100 folder higher mutation rate per generation than allowed for a evolution narrative. List goes on and on.
@@CountJeffula Creationists care? Genetic testing has shown humans are not related to even homo sapiens past like 10 000 years ago. Fossil record has fully refuted common descent theory with phyla coming first not last, and less phyla now than in the past second major critical blow. Encode project proved humans have over 100 folder higher mutation rate per generation than allowed for a evolution narrative.
@@CountJeffula They care? Genetic testing has shown modern humans not related to homo sapiens past around 10 000 years. Fossil record fully refuted common descent with phyla first not last, and less phyla now than in past two critical blows. Encode project proved humans have over 100 fold higher mutation rate/generation than allowed for a evolution explanation.
@@CountJeffula Huh? Genetic testing shown> modern humans not related to homo sapiens past around 10 000 years. Fossil record refutes common descent> phyla first not last/less phyla now than in past two critical blows. Encode project>humans have 100 fold higher mutation rate a generation than allowed for a evolution explanation.
ive read on some subreddits that its a variant of denisovan, is this true?
Homo sunreddits were known for small brains and grouping together in large unhappy numbers.
They aren't sure yet
@@athmaid yeah, thats also what i thought they arent too sure
300,000 years ago! Larger brain makes them very interesting to me too! Ironic that a person with a smaller brain is defining a person with more brain size!
Larger brains are not always associated with more intelligence. That extra brain matter could be used for something other than thinking. For example, it is thought that the extra matter in the Neanderthal brain was devoted to visual processing, so maybe they were better at spotting animals in camouflage or something.
@@mudshovel289 Just like how the Blue whale's brain is way bigger than human brains, but the blue whale is clearly not more intelligence.
This video is interesting, I want to see more of this content.
This is extremely premature. And to absorb Denisovans into the umbrella of Juluensis makes absolutely zero sense. All of this is absurd to change the entire paradigm over a few skull fragments. RIDICULOUS.
Of course it’s ridiculous. Follow the money and the people doing this. These people don’t have proof… they simply WANT it to be true so they write the history for themselves and hope nobody looks into it.
You're just like those climate or covid deniers.
@@smurfyday Thefuckareyoutalkingabout lol
I still see these guys on the bus to work.
So denisovans will be named this???
yass queen
Bigger brain doesn’t necessarily mean more intelligence, the density of neurons is more indicative of an organism’s potential for intelligence
Even if they were more intelligent it could be that their brain required too much energy in relation to their available diet causing the cost to outweigh the benefit. It could be that early humans were the right amount of intelligent and efficient that we were able to improve our intelligence while our brains became more efficient rather than larger.
Brain size isn't correlated with intelligence. If it were elephants would of reached the moon.
relative to body size it very much does
@Cobbido No it doesn't. Is Shaq the smartest human on earth? Are NBA players known for their revolutionary discoveries?
Slime Molds....
Your logic would assume that taller people have the capacity for greater intelligence than short people based on cranial capacity. You should study biology and spend less time reading comic books.
@Cobbido By the way. Elephants have a higher brain to body size ratio than humans. So do hippopotamus' and certain whales. You should spend less time lying. It's not a sign of "intelligence"
Its either a lost species of ape, or it's a nephilim hybrid. They wonder why they only find one of these "missing link"s, it's because there aren't more than one. Fallen angels mixed with human females created a unique nephilim child, some enormous and some smaller like humans.
Also, there weren't two of each species on the ark, there were up to seven of each "kind". Larger apes could have perished as smaller apes were saved to reproduce. It seems like most of the smaller breed of the animals were saved.
Wooly mammoth, wooly rhino, they were before the flood, those two didn't make it on the ark but other rhino and elephant "kind"s did.
Even many dinosaurs made it on the ark, there are stories as far back as Alexander the great talking about dinosaurs in caves, stories from the Amazon and Congo, being the only habitable places that large dinosaurs could live, ofc preserved on the ark as eggs.
Who knows what the variety of animals looked like before the flood, there were definitely more of each kind. There were probably twenty different kinds of tigers and lions but only some were saved. Its amazing how much the bengal and siberian tiger look alike, just different colors.
Almost everything with larger tusks was left behind, like sabertooth tiger.
It's amazing that there are dinosaur graveyards where thousands of dinosaurs were buried together like they were all caught off guard by the same flood. Some even have human bones lower in the sediment than dinosaur bones, and other places have foot prints and dinosaur prints formed at the same time when humans are supposed to be millions of years later than dinosaurs.
Soon enough people will start paying attention to the Bible and seeing that it is our history. Even in Genesis it talks about the ocean opening up which you could only see the deep sea rift that was created, only been able to be seen a couple of hundred years ago, yet it was written about 4500 years ago in the Bible. One single landmass, Pangea where they all lived until the tectonic plates shifted and separated the land.
This too before GTA VI
We will have evolved into a new species before Rockstar releases GTA VI
When they find the skull of Goliath, they did name him a new specie called Homo Goliatesis. It never stops.
Just like computer chips the human brain got smaller and more powerful over time
Nah, I've got that new iPhone brain mutation - big shell, disappointing contents.
No, in fact, our brains have stopped getting bigger when childbirth became a serious cause of death, because of the baby head size. That's why our babies are born so small and weak, they're premature, so the head can get through We finish our development after being born. That's when our heads grow to freakishly large sizes lol.
bad comparison, the human consciousness isn't computational. It's not composed of trillions of tiny transistors.
Theres no evidence modern Humans brains are more powerful than ancient Humans, only smaller. A more relevant comparision is the smaller brains of dogs compared to wolves, the domesticated animal losing brain function it no longer needs.
And dont equate technological level with intelligence, it follows its own curve. The Romans were just as smart as us, they didnt have smartphones.
I found some thing new and get to name it. Scientific community: No... been here, done that.
East asian people with big brains, that sounds relatable
These are not the ancestors of modern East Asian people. Modern East Asians came from the out-of-Africa migration that happened about 70,000 years ago. DNA proves this. This species lived in Asia 300,000 years ago. Also East Asians are a little bit mixed with Neanderthals like other non African people. But we haven’t found other species DNA in East Asians that could have been this new species. So it probably died out before the ancestors of East Asians got there.
You forgot the small eyes and small p....
Just like elephants and their big brains...
These kinds of comments are generally either Asian worshipping neckbeard Westerners, or actual racists from East Asia.
Conclusion to having a new species based on a single incomplete specimen is beyond me.
And I am a biologist with a PhD.
£10 says you're not a biologist with a PhD. Most likely a moron with a pretty small D.
What if all the human fossils we find in caves, all were wierdos?
I'm sure there was tons of weirdos back then.
Most of the hominid fossils we find in caves are the remnants of predators feeding upon them. Many have telltale marks from the teeth of leopards, bears, lions & other species that ate their pray in, or near caves, giving us the misguided impression that our early ancestors lived in caves.
lol like the modern day basement dwellers
Very unlikely
Like the people today, that do the phone surveys.
Representing the rest of us.
A bigger head so a new species? Are these guys scientists Or just people obsessed with labelling.
See those Neanderthal skulls? They had huge eyeballs. To see a living Neanderthal would look scarey as hell to us.
Who saw a "neanderthal"? Who recorded it and described it?
@@theKingsAmbassadors sorry, you’ll never convince us to ignore science.
@@theKingsAmbassadors this dumbass dosent know what a fossil is 🤣🤣
@@theKingsAmbassadors Your mom.
I remember a welder named bud. They didn't make a welding helmet big enough.
Is it Homer Simpson? 😅
Homo homer
Homor Simian
@@ConceptsOfAName 😂
I have always known that Bobbleheads were real!😂😂😂
Hope they manage to extract ancient DNA from them, so we get a clearer picture!
*John Hammond intensifies*
Heard a theory years ago that Polynesian and some other Asian people come from a different line of genetic history. Maybe this has something to do with that? Interesting. So it's looking like Africa isn't the begin. We are still trying to figure that one out. Heard stories coming from Europe too. Mountain ranges around Turkey and Croatia they have found other very old humanoid skeletons.
Any “new discovery” coming from China always gets me skeptical.
Don’t know what to trust
Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution is a lot more complex in nature. It is possible for other human remains to be unearthed.
There have been questions raised about the accuracy of Chinese fossil records because the government of that country tends to use them to push its own idea of Chinese superiority. Not sure where these fossils fall in regard to those controversies, but this video clip is missing *a lot* of relevant information. Since I haven’t seen these ideas put forward by the big players in the field, I take the claims in this video with a very big pinch of salt.
I think Chris will not stop working until he knows the answer.
One should always remain sceptical, particularly about Chinese 'superiority', or any other political entity's claim. However, I don't think that criticism applies these days - perhaps it did 20 yrs ago. A lot of the relevant information you want can be found via the *links* in the Wikipedia article for Homo juluensis where both parties to this ^^^ discussion have produced papers
The CCP did encourage their scientists to investigate that possibility , but quietened down when the answer came back that no significant genetic differences could be identified and conceded that we are all one species.If recovery of Mitochondrial DNA is possible from their fossil specimens one could expect them to try and resurrect that idea for nationalist political reasons
Medically, our lineage has determined that autism is associated with larger brains and too many neurons. This is why we can't comprehend these larger brains in archaeological finds. Do you have anything to contribute that could help us?
Who are the big players in the field? It's fascinating. You've become so defensive all of a sudden. Maybe we should measure your cranial capacity. You're clearly lying about there being big players in the field who are ALSO as defensive about this as you are.
If you think it's a misleading BBC video spreading Chinese ethnocentricism, then what will you do when you find out about the BBC's take on Africa?
Stop tempting me to make "your mom" jokes and break the law in order to ruin your lineage's future. The devil is clearly protecting you from me
Like white Europeans didn’t do the same thing? Dude, they tried to prove white people were more evolved due to skull size and shape than people of African descent - because racism.
So you found my ancestors at last
Creationists will say it's Goliath's skull
The devil put them there to test our faith obviously duh
So you believe you came from an ape?
@@theKingsAmbassadors i dont know about you but i came from a man, my parents were
@@theKingsAmbassadors yes
@@theKingsAmbassadorsthat’s how thick you are, we didn’t come from an ape, we developed similarly on our own branch . Get educated and you’ll understand.
“Check out the big brain on Brad”
It reminds me of that girl that Chandler from ‘Friends’ was seeing with the big head 😂.. Biiig Heaaad!
So this is where Irish people came from.
could be.
this is from eastasia
@@onlinme7884i dont agree. These were irish bones
@@thomasvalen5814 did the scientist say anything about irish?
1700cc brain size. Checks out.
We love categorising things that are all unique.
Whether or not it's a different species, it's Fascinating to find a variety of diverse fossils!
It will also be fascinating to learn when and how they went extinct, since modern humans were in those areas for 10's of thousands of years longer than they were in the glacier locked regions of western europe 🤔
Interbreeding with Homo Sapiens maybe? , but if so there may be genetic traces in our genome , much like Europeans and Asians are1-2% Neanderthal
Interesting. I can't wait to see facial reconstruction. Maybe they're related to sasquatch, mountain men, and yeti...
That's not enough to define this as a different species.. there is variation within a species and there is no genetic evidence saying this is a different species... we have to be careful with saying it's totally different, if they could interbreed with us and make fertile offspring that's a clear indication they are not a different species... subspecies at best. It's why Denisovans don't have a species name is because we're at least somewhat learning a lesson in classification
Thank you !
Music playing over the voices makes it impossible to listen to the words. Why add music ?
I always wonder what archeologists in the future would think if they found the remains of Shaquille O'Neal next to Kevin Hart? Im.sure they'd think they were two different species!!
No they wouldn't. It's not just about size. The whole skeleton is taken into account. The ratio between different body parts is important. Both Shaq and Hart have a similar ratio of arm to leg length, or upper arm to forearm, or upper leg to lower leg, or limb to torso, etc. Like, neither KH's and Shaq's arms hang down to the ground like other apes. Both their arms hang down to the same place on their body. Teeth and skull shape are very important too.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@ElemergentWhat about Danny Devito to Shaq?
So this species disappears 50,000 years ago and Neanderthal disappears 45,000 years ago, different parts of the world. What happened to them, to the Denisovans?
Humans happened.
They are not new, they're called Trumpers.
Very orange and hairy. 🍑
Lmao 🤣💀
You're not new either. We watched the Nazi party, communism and socialism rise and fall.
Guess what TRUMP WON FOR A REASON.😂😂😂😂😂
"The world is changed. I feel it in the water. I feel it in the Earth. I smell it in the air.
Much that once was is lost. For none now live who remember it."
I feel it in my fingers, I feel it in my toes....too. 🖐️🥾🌿
Creationists are scratching their heads trying to twist this to make it fit
Why do you say so?
@szikszaylevi4909 Because I can
@@nobs997 I meant why would these discoveries make the creationist world view less of an option? I don’t see the contradiction.
@@szikszaylevi4909 Are you not aware of their views? They believe the Bible is literal, and as such reject evolution and always try to explain things by rejecting any and all evidence that would suggest otherwise, which includes rejecting that there's any connection between modern humans and other hominids. And regularly say things like "the fossils are too partial, it wasn't a human, but some ape" , or things like "apes and humans are completely distinct , no connection whatsoever. God created them separately" and such. They have programs, movies, youtube channels, museums, universities etc. that systematically try to twist, mis-interpret, mis-represent, straw man or straight out reject any facts and findings that challenges their literal interpretation of the Bible.
I told some about the Eve gene once.
Great find!
Who added the false human evolution animation to this presentation?
Meanwhile they are covering up the studies done on the Peru Mummies that are a completely differnt species all together and have now been proven to be 100% real organic specimens
I know some big headed East Asians who are descended from these guys. They’re all very smart.
“Roses are red, violets are blue, there’s always an Asian better than you.”
😂💯👍
@@rossmcleod7983 except that it's all tofu dreg.
The females in that lineage have a special reproductive tract adaptation which allows them to give birth to large-headed children.
East asian are good at business
South Asian are good tech
Southeast asian are good at social studies
Yeah we asians are built different 😅
@@rossmcleod7983
I wish they would research the Paracus more!
Here comes the religious fanatics saying it’s all fake and evolution is not real , prepare 😂😂
My head is huge.. can’t find a hat that fits. I’m also a genius. I believe those two facts are connected.
Boskop Man found in South Africa had a cranial capacity of 1,832cc. But since its in Africa they would rather not talk about it .
Medically, our lineage has determined that autism is associated with large brains with too many neurons. This is why we can't comprehend these larger brains. Do you have anything to contribute to us that might help us?
Agreed. Them Boers are too smart for their own good.
@@glennllewellyn7369 Funny man. Boskop man is a Khoisan ancestor.
Maybe the huge headed human species died out because of the difficulty during birth, and our species survived by evolving just as high intelligence but in a smaller brain🧠💨👍
Nowadays it’s like these guys are trying to divide the atom - coming up with new alleged species to get some popularity …
I have allways read that neanderthal have 1600 cc. brains. So the difference isn't that extreme. And they seem to have lived in the same period. Perhaps we should look at them more as variation within a species.
A much longer brain but died out, disease?
aliens
So you're saying, their head game is strong?
Trumpanzees? 🧐
And yet again religion is disproven. Because the data shows that humans were apes and not magically created in image of a sky wizard
lol where? Modern science has proven the reverse of what you just said. No common descent phyla came first, and more phyla in past than now. Modern humans not even genetically related to homo sapiens of the past. ENCODE projected proved human generational mutation rate over 100 fold too high. Discovery of DNA, finite start to universe, fine tuned universe, no naturalistic origin of life and the rationality of the mind we all use all require a God. The science has never been more against your position in all of human history.
what is even more ironic is your position is the one of magic, probability producing consistently rational outcomes is the definition of magic. God creating is mind. Mind>magic
lol where? Modern science has proven the reverse of what you just said. No common descent phyla came first, and more phyla in past than now. Modern humans not even genetically related to homo sapiens of the past.
ENCODE projected proved human generational mutation rate over 100 fold too high. Discovery of DNA, finite start to universe, fine tuned universe, no naturalistic origin of life and the rationality of the mind we all use all require a God. The science has never been more against your position in all of human history.
@ Humans share a remarkable amount of DNA with modern apes, highlighting our close evolutionary relationship.
Among our closest relatives are chimpanzees and bonobos, with whom we share approximately 98-99% of our DNA. This similarity is not surprising, given that our lineages diverged only about 5-7 million years ago. Chimpanzees and bonobos are genetically equidistant to humans, and the small genetic differences between us contribute to the distinct traits, such as higher cognitive abilities and complex language, that define humans.
Moving slightly further in our evolutionary tree, humans share about 98% of their DNA with gorillas. While gorillas are more distantly related to us compared to chimpanzees, they still exhibit behaviors and social structures that bear similarities to human societies. Gorillas, like us, have intricate family bonds and can even use tools, although their cognitive abilities are less developed than those of humans or chimpanzees.
Orangutans, found in Southeast Asia, are among the more distant of the great apes in terms of shared DNA. Humans share about 96.9-97% of their DNA with orangutans. Despite this greater genetic distance, orangutans exhibit impressive problem-solving skills and complex behaviors. Their solitary nature and unique adaptations to arboreal life make them distinct from both humans and African apes.
These high percentages of shared DNA emphasize the evolutionary connections between humans and modern apes. The differences, though relatively small in genetic terms, have led to the vast diversity in anatomy, behavior, and cognition that separates us today.
Explain the above and why your sky wizard "made" all the various hominids?
Would this explain the giant skulls in NZ
That's why Asians are good at maths
Most of these comments have nothing to do with the video and its content. Just people saying dumb things. Education is doomed.