SaltEMike Reacts to Inside Star Citizen: Firebird Is The Word

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • The Video - • Inside Star Citizen: F...
    Check out my main channel - / @saltemike
    Check out my clips channel -
    / @saltemikeclips
    Check Out My Twitch Stream to see this live: / saltemike

КОМЕНТАРІ • 267

  • @Gunnberg85
    @Gunnberg85 4 місяці тому +41

    Theory crafting: Create the raw material "Biomass". A designated amount of Biomass is required to generate one clone. The med vehicle can only hold so much biomass and thus can only fully create so many clones. Healing injuries may take the same resource but in smaller quantities. Thus, the beds can heal numerous times but only fully regenerate a few times.
    Result: No infinite respawns.

    • @HansangVibration
      @HansangVibration 4 місяці тому +4

      actually cool idea

    • @Gunnberg85
      @Gunnberg85 4 місяці тому

      @@HansangVibration Thanks :)

    • @seeker_rodan3113
      @seeker_rodan3113 4 місяці тому +1

      I second this

    • @mayoluck
      @mayoluck 4 місяці тому +2

      Just use the same med gel as the gun but in larger quantities. Its not rocket science, but we are talking about CIG.

    • @wb2463
      @wb2463 4 місяці тому +3

      Yeah, this would made med vehicles and medic gameplay so much better! And start tying professions together if cargo runners can supply you with extra "biomass" while on the go, almost, dare I say it, like an economy.

  • @Casey093
    @Casey093 4 місяці тому +5

    Great how they fit a medical bed in the back of a small vehicle, but cannot fit more than a handful of beds on a 75 m long ship.

  • @bnut1979
    @bnut1979 4 місяці тому +9

    "What did we learn this week? That the BMM won't see the light of day before 1.0 and the medical gameploop is dead."

    • @Gm-ce5kg
      @Gm-ce5kg 4 місяці тому +1

      negative, please go back to spectrum

  • @Minishimirukaze
    @Minishimirukaze 4 місяці тому +22

    The firebird is a two pump chump. Change my mind.

    • @Ragecon87
      @Ragecon87 4 місяці тому +1

      Idk who thinks we want these small missile boats…. I’ve never even seen anyone flying the talon version

    • @Minishimirukaze
      @Minishimirukaze 4 місяці тому

      @@Ragecon87 right? I want a caterpillar with missile rack modules. They can fly out of the sides of the ship before curving to the target.

    • @Ragecon87
      @Ragecon87 4 місяці тому +3

      @@Minishimirukaze 😂 now that would be a missile boat try and out maneuver 1000 missiles

    • @Warsheep2k6
      @Warsheep2k6 4 місяці тому

      @@Ragecon87 thats because missiles suck at the moment i fitted my sabre with 2 481 racks just for the lulz but arrows fly everywhere TFs think straightlining is cool and the other missiles cant even take a shield down from a fighter if theyd hit

  • @anom794939393
    @anom794939393 4 місяці тому +17

    raven gold standard is a slap in the face to cutlass and connies. ships so many people fly. also it not being available in game is bs.

    • @mustrumridcully3853
      @mustrumridcully3853 4 місяці тому +2

      Old ships dont get new money - new ships generate income. It's an easy way to get more money in. CIG dont own the Raven - Intel do, so Intel decide how many are released - not CIG. You dont sell something to someone, then complain you cant use it.

    • @hephaestion12
      @hephaestion12 4 місяці тому +2

      Yep you guys will get mk 2s to buy not gold standard 😂

  • @jasonmack760
    @jasonmack760 4 місяці тому +38

    Why, oh why, do people complain so much about Star Citizen selling things? You buy the game, at an Early Access price no less, and... After that, you're under no obligation to spend so much as *one more dime* on it. You have access to the full game as it exists today, and to everything in its future, any other money you kick to them is solely at your discretion.

    • @tricktap8502
      @tricktap8502 4 місяці тому

      Because they try to present it as anything but what they're really trying to do, sell ships..No one likes a salesman and everyone hates a lying one.

    • @snoop_lion
      @snoop_lion 4 місяці тому +14

      Because they are putting effort into making quick and easy ships to sell that are just variants of other ships. Rather than putting all resources into oh Idk finishing the dang game maybe? Finishing modularity. Adding more missions. Optimizing the game to run better and fix bugs. Or even Finish the BACKLOG of ships previously sold perhaps. All these things they could be doing and should be doing, and they are just being digital ship merchants instead. But you are right, I'm not giving them a single dime anymore and I think more players should do that if they want to see a real game start to be made.

    • @snoop_lion
      @snoop_lion 4 місяці тому +4

      @@BigFreakinTexan I have seen this exact same comment posted on other star citizen vids. Is this a copy pasta joke or bot posting?

    • @nip3004
      @nip3004 4 місяці тому

      How do I have the full game if I can never have the raven? That is a part of the game

    • @lukeperman7964
      @lukeperman7964 4 місяці тому +1

      If they don't have sales, we won't have any game as they need to fund the game somehow

  • @VolksAlphaRogue
    @VolksAlphaRogue 4 місяці тому +21

    One thing that I think is a little out of touch is the Dev's comment 'People ask me all the time, where is the Medivac... so it is here now' .... I dont think that is the Medivac people are asking about... *COUGH* RSI Apollo Medivac

    • @TheWasd1234
      @TheWasd1234 4 місяці тому +2

      The dev knows. Its a joke they mentioned mid video ugh

    • @sodiufas
      @sodiufas 4 місяці тому

      I personally saw people wnating ursa medivac a few times on reddit, idk.

    • @JohnSmith-ue3pt
      @JohnSmith-ue3pt 4 місяці тому

      it was a tasteless joke

  • @CopperRavenProductions
    @CopperRavenProductions 4 місяці тому +2

    Wait... the Shrike has 24 size 3s and a small fighter. But the firebird is a medium with 12 missels. Am I missing something?

  • @ultrasquall22
    @ultrasquall22 4 місяці тому +2

    What's the point of keeping an Apollo Triage or Apollo Medivac now? Can just keep an Ursa in the back of anything and it serves the same purpose.

  • @skatman3278
    @skatman3278 4 місяці тому +2

    They should have called it the Nursa. Absolute missed opportunity.

  • @ddavis5442
    @ddavis5442 4 місяці тому +16

    CIG missed a big opportunity here, the Firebird really should have been an Dampner ship to pair with the Emp version. The missile version is DOA

    • @Tsudico
      @Tsudico 4 місяці тому +2

      I agree, out of all ships with dampening, RSI has 3. I would go farther and make it able to snare like the Mantis.

    • @ddavis5442
      @ddavis5442 4 місяці тому

      @Tsudico maybe they'll get smart and make a Sabre Phoenix or something with a dampner/QED. About the only people that would want this is people maybe looking to upgrade from the talon, if this is even an upgrade from that. If your talking missile boat the Lancer MISS smokes this with more shielding, almost triple the firepower and more missiles. Plus better armor and cargo with a missile reloader. Game.... Set.... Match.

    • @Tsudico
      @Tsudico 4 місяці тому

      @@ddavis5442 There is already the Constellation Phoenix so I doubt they will do that. Perhaps they can make the QED Sabre Peregrine.

    • @ddavis5442
      @ddavis5442 4 місяці тому

      @@Tsudico that's a mouth full, but I like it hahah

    • @BlazeBlevinspace
      @BlazeBlevinspace 4 місяці тому

      I like the firebird nice looking ship.

  • @redslate
    @redslate 4 місяці тому +2

    Sabre is Medium Stealth; Talon is Light. That's the tradeoff w/regards to the Shriek.
    With all med-beds enabling "respawn," we can expect in-game death to be fleshed out more (à la "Death of a Spaceman").
    Ex. If you manage to make it back to a Tier 1 bed, your character is fully healed/revived with minimal (if any) long-term impact.
    Tier 2 revive, maybe you end up with a moderate injury/permanent battle scars (compounding over time).
    Tier 3 revive, you may incur a severe, life-altering wound (lose a limb, an eye, etcetera).
    Just speculating, but it's likely something along these lines. Respawning in a Tier 3 bed isn't going to be an inconsequential "mulligan."

    • @Warsheep2k6
      @Warsheep2k6 4 місяці тому

      Right now it will be and I somehow doubt it will stay the way it is also its 20m thats good for combat but as soon as you hit even a bunker youre out of respawn range JT other pvp centric maps this thing will get nuked out of existence by scourges before you can say ursa medivac even more priority then storms and novas

  • @TheGuilev
    @TheGuilev 4 місяці тому +3

    firebird is gold Standard but not the F7 or F8...

  • @gracefulhorror731
    @gracefulhorror731 4 місяці тому +1

    Has the freelancer max been standardized? It looked super clean in the end of the ursa medivac section. Based on my memory of how clunky I remembered it.

  • @Leptospirosi
    @Leptospirosi 4 місяці тому +1

    CIG want to sell medical ships and vehicles for IAE and that's all. Once the Apollo will be ready, they will explain how you actually need (to buy) a real medical ship to do any medical stuff and we can just melt our old stuff.
    I've been saying Star Citizen has been run by marketing for years, doing things that hurt the game for the good of sales.
    These clowns are telling us "we hear you" but they don't: they just need something, easy to put in game, to push more sales. I've been telling we need medical beds to be properly manned to increase Heal wounds Tier higher then rated, which will promote people running around, on Pisces and Cutlass R, doing medical services. Instead CIG Marketing Department just though to throw everything out of the window, screwing player medics, until they will be able to sell the next "Magic Respawn" ship with sub par medical mechanics.
    Good job: you never disappoint! 👏👏👏

  • @wouterhak2694
    @wouterhak2694 4 місяці тому +1

    *yust to clarify THIS IS MY OPINION* the firebird is dead on arrival yust two s3 gunns sucks and the main feuture is its missiles but you cant switch out the racks for more rockets so you shoot twice and youre done and you are stuck with two s3 gunns i mean cmon why not have yust 1 emp and this ship would be so much better,so now to compare the normal sabre/comet can switch the racks holding up to 16 size 1 rockets or 8 size 2 and has 4 s3 gunns the firebird will only be bought by idiots yust for how it looks i bet this ship will be around 200 dollars and its even worse then a mantis.

  • @jonnyterk
    @jonnyterk 4 місяці тому +1

    No ship or item power wise, shouldn't be available to earn in game, by anyone who starts playing at anytime. Cash dollars should be able to get you exclusive skins, or non power or ability type trinkets, but any ship, armor, gun, base etc etc should be available in game at anytime by anyone. Sure maybe make it difficult to acquire like you have to gain maximum reputation with a faction or whatnot and then complete an endgame type boss or raid, and/or super expensive with uaec. but never only available with cash dollars or had to do something in 1985 or never available again. Game should be balanced and fair to any player at anytime in game.

  • @The1RandomFool
    @The1RandomFool 4 місяці тому +1

    A ship that nobody can buy again should probably be one of the lowest priorities to get gold standard. The ship outlasted the drive. I replaced the Optane drive with a M.2 drive several years ago. I'm a little disappointed the firebird filled in the wing holes. And 12 missiles seems a little on the low side to me.

  • @MichaelDBruce
    @MichaelDBruce 4 місяці тому +1

    Biggest problem with the saber firebird is that, 12 missiles doesnt seem like enough, missiles are currently broken in game and have been broke every other patch... Aside from looking like a raven, im not sure what this ship is offering

  • @BobWobbles
    @BobWobbles 4 місяці тому +1

    I wish they'd just do something about the stock Sabre. Give it some speed/acceleration and/or handling buffs. I love the Sabre but there's no reason to fly it when there are hornets etc

  • @mynameisprivate158
    @mynameisprivate158 4 місяці тому +2

    Easy fix for the new med beds: You can respawn in any medical bed but it takes the bed 20 minutes to "3D print" your new body and it ties up the med bay for that whole time,or you can sit in the bed for 2 minutes to replace just your arm that was blown off and the next person on your team can get treatment! So medical would still be a needed assette to pull people off the battlefield and treat wounded. Especially if there is a x vs x FPS PVP battle going on and a couple people are already dead so the respawn queue is already 40 minutes before you can start your 20 minute regen!!

    • @jearlblah5169
      @jearlblah5169 4 місяці тому

      20 minutes is too long. Maybe more like 5, and 10 seconds for healing

  • @jonnyterk
    @jonnyterk 4 місяці тому +1

    What about the future? with death of a space man? Does each respawn count towards permanent death? With death of a space man, you wouldn't want to respawn correct??

  • @Equinoxcode
    @Equinoxcode 4 місяці тому +1

    Medical vehicles should be reliant on a medical resource for respawning. So if you dont have your med vehicle stocked with said resource you cant respawn

  • @Ragecon87
    @Ragecon87 4 місяці тому +3

    Someone commented in chat with a good option, if you have a T1 injury but respawn in a lower tier bed you will still have that injury

    • @watermelon58
      @watermelon58 4 місяці тому

      thats how it should be or the entire medical system is pointless its the dumbest system ever right now

    • @mattb8754
      @mattb8754 4 місяці тому

      They won't do that. They'll wait until after everyone buys the nursa then nerf the respawn ability.

  • @karmabad6287
    @karmabad6287 4 місяці тому +1

    Would have prefered emp"s rather than another useless missile ship. Well, cross fingers for an emp module.

  • @itllBuffGaming
    @itllBuffGaming 4 місяці тому +1

    "Everyone asked for the Midivac". Are we sure people didnt mean the Apollo Medivac? Its in the name lmao

  • @soyentak5076
    @soyentak5076 4 місяці тому +2

    They should just introduce emp warheads on missiles

    • @mustrumridcully3853
      @mustrumridcully3853 4 місяці тому +1

      That is what the Sentinel is supposed to have - not an EMP.

  • @IdleWorker
    @IdleWorker 4 місяці тому +1

    I'd also warn everyone tempted to buy a polaris: we havent heard ANYTHING about it since january, and they might very well BMM it after the invictus sale (because they know they can now). Buyers beware.

  • @FollowTheFreeman
    @FollowTheFreeman 4 місяці тому +1

    As a Raven owner, this is fucked up. Can't trust CIG to stick to any standards. New sale? What ship can we copy paste with minimal effort. I fucking hate the direction this game has gone.
    Completely kills any hope I had of selling this fucking thing for a profit. Done even following this game, 4.0 can eat shit.

    • @mayoluck
      @mayoluck 4 місяці тому +1

      Bro im trying to dump my account and its never been harder. That big money group has come and gone. The new group of players are the nickel and dime group.

  • @megaweasel706
    @megaweasel706 4 місяці тому +1

    the non-ability to respawn on any medical bed isnt difficulty, its tedium... tedium isnt fun gameplay. Im glad youll be able to respawn on the ursa. however I hope we see consumable requirements for respawns soon

    • @justalex4214
      @justalex4214 4 місяці тому

      This. Med orgs are just whining now because they have to larp a bit more now to live out their medic fantasies but from a gameplay point of view this change is a huge win for general daily play.

  • @reamoinmcdonachadh9519
    @reamoinmcdonachadh9519 4 місяці тому +4

    Ray's Guide fellow thinks this change to med beds presages the advent of Death of A Spaceman as a coming thing SOONER than people expect.

    • @frogger2011ify
      @frogger2011ify 4 місяці тому +2

      Can't see death of a space man ever being a thing, there's nothing to take from your character from death beyond things it may have purchased in its life. Rep is laughable and skills are not or should ever be a thing. Every game that tried a similar mechanic either died because of it or rolled back the idea

    • @latjolajban81
      @latjolajban81 4 місяці тому

      @@frogger2011ify Well skill was supposed to be a big thing in SC

    • @frogger2011ify
      @frogger2011ify 4 місяці тому

      @@latjolajban81 MMO Skills were never going to be in the game.....player personal skill yes MMO skills and abilities no

    • @latjolajban81
      @latjolajban81 4 місяці тому

      @@frogger2011ify Player personal skill is what I meant.

  • @mcvellrobinson9186
    @mcvellrobinson9186 4 місяці тому +1

    There's no money in improving ships they've already sold us!

    • @mayoluck
      @mayoluck 4 місяці тому

      Yep, they should have to finish stuff they sold yrs ago. Im still wating on coat from 2012 and like 5 ships from the last 7ys.

  • @FallenPhantom0
    @FallenPhantom0 4 місяці тому +1

    Hopium is rough Mike 😂😂😂

  • @SierraWater
    @SierraWater 4 місяці тому +1

    the firebird looks sick imo.

  • @ferdinandoarmeni6328
    @ferdinandoarmeni6328 4 місяці тому +2

    freedlancer needs love. Thats all i can say here.

  • @project.jericho
    @project.jericho 4 місяці тому +1

    Missile boats are shit.

  • @Citizen-Nurseman
    @Citizen-Nurseman 4 місяці тому +3

    At least they spawned a variant out of that gold standard work
    But yep, absolutely wierd choice to have chosen that one

    • @itsdibbles
      @itsdibbles 4 місяці тому

      i assume the pass was done because of the variant lol

    • @TheMonkey55
      @TheMonkey55 4 місяці тому

      The variant was created so they could get the greenlight to gold standard the Raven.... and make money. It was on the radar because of the Ship Showdown where it was artificially removed bc they couldnt sell it at the BIS sale.

  • @BigFreakinTexan
    @BigFreakinTexan 4 місяці тому +3

    As a Raven owner, when I first heard about the Firebird, I wasn't too happy with my "rare" ship no longer being rare. Now that I've see what the Firebird is, I'm actually pretty stoked on it. It's capabilities are unique enough that I feel like the two ships serve very different purposes. One is a stealthy ship with powerful EMP capabilities and the other is a stealth missile ship. I think calling the Firebird a "missile boat" isn't quite accurate since it only carries 12. That being said, a fast, maneuverable stealth ship with 12 missiles will introduce some interesting gameplay. I'm thinking of it as a very nimble mini-Eclipse.

  • @ConradLarsonGaming
    @ConradLarsonGaming 4 місяці тому +1

    I'm hoping that eventually the Firebird will get its own variant that has EMPs. Effectively they'll 'retire' the Sabre Raven and we'll get the Sabre Thunderbird. But to just bring out a 'legally distinct' EMP Sabre first would be too obvious.

  • @defnotscott8667
    @defnotscott8667 4 місяці тому +1

    Man, I had my wallet ready for the Raven or a non-exclusive version of the Raven. Pretty disappointed that the Firebird is a missile boat..

  • @KuruptU4Fun
    @KuruptU4Fun 4 місяці тому +1

    The Raven is a unique ship that is highly exclusive, it's also a ship that's practically made of glass (just like the Bucc) and really has to work to avoid combat then dive back into it to discharge those two EMP's. Since it's made of glass and has 2 size 3 weapons then it's likely the best components it should use is stealth ones, military ones are going to make it very detectable.
    The Firebird also fills a niche role that only one other ships has, the Talon, and that role also needs to be filled out with options. So just because the Raven is exclusive and has those 2 EMP "poppers" doesn't mean those can't be used in other types of ships. A Mantis (or Bucc) interdictor variant with those two EMP poppers could do the same thing, just a different option.
    That doesn't stop CIG from making a different ship outside of the Sabre lineup, we don't know if that idea is on a drawing board yet.

  • @seekerhooligan781
    @seekerhooligan781 4 місяці тому

    Wtf? I am playing this game less and less, and that says something considering I WAS loving SC.
    3.23- EVA..great.. visuals.. great.. turning armor into "loadouts" weak, turning ships into "loadouts" ..weak, hangars?, many other items?, New Old ships?? Not fixing wayyy more necessary problems?, mini map, great, loot, great, starmap - Working? .. see where I'm going here? Why don't they clean up the yard before tackling a new rando project?
    So.. With MM in 3.23, My HOSAS is pretty useless, all my current ships are nerfed, feel like I'm fighting my own ship to fly it, dead slow, and boring to fly in combat, racing, basic flight, (in PU or AC) and really only useful to melt down now, but we've introduced a NEW old missile boat that you can't have unless you're "exclusive" , so you can contribute to lame DPS battles hovering at the edge of combat, fitting perfectly into MM overcomplicated arcade gameplay. Enjoy!
    At least we get a half assed reboot of a med truck that has new paint though. That makes up for my complete lack of excitement from MMs ruining my 3.23 experience.
    Just garbage. I won't be recommending my friends to jump in during Invictus as I was previously planning to.

  • @izraphailzero5610
    @izraphailzero5610 4 місяці тому

    THEY EDITED IT!
    8:07 there was a phrase initially "we want new generation of citizens to get this shape" or something like this!
    I even was joking in the comments under the video!
    They removed this part! LMAO
    UPD: actually - my bad, its there but 11:33.
    But still - they're saying it directly: We want to milk new generation of citizens

  • @sospeti
    @sospeti 4 місяці тому

    The Firebird is a cool looking ship but the fire power is lacking IMHO. 12 S3 missiles justify calling it a missile ship?. And once they are gone you've got nothing. The Ares Inferno can have 20 S3 missiles and an OP S7 gatling with 3.6k bullets that can do damage. Not sure what role the Firebird will play. Group bounties out of question unless you want to restock after each target. Maybe single ERT mssions, but even than against multiple targets you will have problems.

  • @mnmlSausE45
    @mnmlSausE45 4 місяці тому

    Dude I was looking forward to the last patch, I skipped the last two patches 3.22 / 3.21 /.
    I played 3.23 for like 3 - 4 days - it got boring. I wanted the Corsair, I got it. And when I played in duo.... came out really shit. Because the game is what it is.
    Then I started looking around the spectrum... and spent two nights reading the Medzin debate. (beacons should stay - you can rework them ... but nobody of that stupid money making fabric listen to examples and/or solutions of thair community)
    But finally with thair new changes they split the community - aplause .
    And through one post I came across you ... and I have to honestly say ... that I am currently disgusted by the way everything is being presented. And yes, it disgusts me.
    Audacity wins out once again.
    But it's good that there are people like you who can see through it to open other people's eyes.
    piece !

  • @ObiWeebKenobi
    @ObiWeebKenobi 4 місяці тому

    11:17 Let me stop you right there John Crewe, I got a better ship for them that can A shoot its payload TENS of kilometers away from the target before they're even detected on scope, B most likely take out said target in one shot, and C fly much faster than the Firebird. (most likely) Hell, it's even an Aegis ship! It's called.......THE ECLIPSE.

  • @seraph8672
    @seraph8672 4 місяці тому

    And the ursambulance…. “Of the top 3 things everyone always asks me about… I ignore the most and second most important question but I have a stupid truck with a respawn capable med bed to further murder medical rescue gameplay because we didn’t feel like we already killed it enough, check that out”
    Thanks. I hate it.

  • @Randomgameplayer101
    @Randomgameplayer101 4 місяці тому

    Nah, they are just ignoring promises they made. 600i rework? Banu? Polaris? Who asked for this rework? They just want to sell ships, don't buy anything unless its in the game. They literally don't care about past promises

  • @qutatron
    @qutatron 4 місяці тому +1

    If they implement exp point and skill system (wich they talked about this long time ago) , backspacing can maybe reduce gained exp.

    • @uliseto
      @uliseto 4 місяці тому

      I do hope we lose skills at least

  • @stephanmilius3598
    @stephanmilius3598 4 місяці тому

    Wow... people are really overreacting alot. Now of a sudden the medical gameplay is dead. I bet that not everbody will have a respawn vehicle around or will in all cases be able to sucessfully use it (out of range or blown up). CIG will adjust that gameplay if needed downstream. And one the shards hold more people, activivating the rescue beacon might become more useful because of higher player density and resulting lower response time. Some people are just crybabies.

  • @TheMonkey55
    @TheMonkey55 4 місяці тому

    I would gladly trade my EMP's on the Raven for the Missile pods on the FireBird. The EMP gameplay is garbage and both ships are not impressive combat wise.

  • @Pyrilium1043
    @Pyrilium1043 4 місяці тому

    If they want to make medical more valuable, they need to make it a resource recovery gameplay. For example, make ORGS stockpile resources in bases that in turn control an area. To claim an area you need to deplete the resources like respawns, fuel, etc. Rescuing downed ORG mates would return or prevent resource loss allowing for longer sieges.

  • @paratrooperz1
    @paratrooperz1 4 місяці тому

    im happy in the games CURRENT state to have tier 3 med bed respawn i wans angry when they took it away! but in the future i want it exclusive to tier 1....
    we need some more game features and flushing out to bring out the MMORPG side of the game but till then its still to easy to die due to bugs and other random things so i say let us enjoy many of the features we grown accustomed until a game loop is nearly filled out....
    i dont like the ursa being a respawn point in future because it ruins death of spaceman and make this to arcade like.

  • @michaeltreon4034
    @michaeltreon4034 4 місяці тому

    I dunno, I hate loging out and waking up in a bed millions of miles away...looking forward to persitance... med vehicle isn't going to get your geared enough to go get your gear...unless you plan ahead...and planning ahead is what I like about this game...

  • @fatman9994
    @fatman9994 4 місяці тому

    As long as 1.0 isn't supposed to be full release and is instead just a beta, then I'm fine with not all ships being out. If they think they can call it 100% released/live without releasing ships that have been in concept for damn near a decade, that's what I'd have an issue with

  • @Xaxxus
    @Xaxxus 4 місяці тому

    IMO, rather than making all these beds into respawns, they should allow all beds to heal all injuries. Otherwise there’s no real benefit to a bed over a med gun. Because injuries can just be silenced with drugs.

  • @Kallivakgames
    @Kallivakgames 4 місяці тому +1

    Making it easier to play missions means more data for cig thus med bed respawning.
    Making flight easier for new players= fresh money to keep developing.
    We are play testing a core tech incomplete alpha.
    Thanks mike for the perspective

  • @vital-wyn1310
    @vital-wyn1310 4 місяці тому

    Firebird would have been a cool ship to make either a racing ship or give it those new gatlin laser weapons to make it feel more futuristic like the raven. Ursa is cool but the respawn is a major step in the wrong direction from what we’ve been told for a while now. Since the firebird is what it is I’d hope to at least have seen something unique in its targeting system to help make sense of the unique position of the launchers. Don’t hate it but it feels like they were so close to bringing something special. Give it more missiles and make it an anti- anti air mechanic lol. Your storm as is firing at me, let me return the favor 😂

  • @fajarn7052
    @fajarn7052 4 місяці тому +1

    What did I learn this week? Man, that MISC Freelancer MAX is a thing of beauty.

    • @TUROCK320
      @TUROCK320 4 місяці тому

      ? boobies front shield ?
      what happend ofr MISC freelancer series ?

  • @hephaestion12
    @hephaestion12 4 місяці тому

    Whoa all the true ship meet enjoyers coming out for this comment section 😬. As long as the raven stays super weak in the meta i dont care about it existing. Just keep it out of the way of people who actually want to play and progress and improve their skills in a videogame.

  • @IXxJordan
    @IXxJordan 4 місяці тому

    Anyone know if the Medical Ursa Will fit in a Zeus? - I dont know the measurements, but wondering if it would be potentially possible.

  • @ZaneDragonBorn
    @ZaneDragonBorn 4 місяці тому

    Look I am fine with it being "exclusive" so long as I am able to steal that ship as a pirate... Then at least its achievable to get by the good or bad. Maybe the owner doesn't want it anymore? hand it off to somebody.

  • @justalex4214
    @justalex4214 4 місяці тому

    I was really excited about the firebird, but since it's a missile boat I'm probably not going to get it... missiles just suck so much and are so unreliable...

  • @JJS563
    @JJS563 4 місяці тому

    There is something in gaming dev culture called "Power creep".
    Things have to get more powerful to be able to sell more ships. We have seen this happen over the years at CIG so yeah

  • @blodrush25
    @blodrush25 4 місяці тому

    i also just calculate how much money they have gotten over the years it's so much you can build a bridge from Danmark to sweden 4 km long 4 lanes both sides over the ocean that's how much money they have gotten thet just sick that they keep ask for more do you know how much money that is Mike this game need to be done asap they keep asking for more an more money
    what happen when the game is finish i never think is going to be because this is a good deal for them not to finish the game do we craft everything in game or do they kappe sell ships an do they charges money each month after when you have spend so much money on this as a player what is the plan here to Rip more money out of the player i really want to know what you think here Mike.

  • @Xaxxus
    @Xaxxus 4 місяці тому

    The firebird is a huge disappointment to me. I would rather they had made a raven MK2 and gave it to the masses.
    IMO the raven was one of the dumbest things they could have done for a ship promo.

  • @junebwoi
    @junebwoi 4 місяці тому

    Is the cutlass gold standard yet or is that too 'cheap' to work on?
    Also will they revert the medical change when the sale is done? lol SHAMELESS

  • @blodrush25
    @blodrush25 4 місяці тому

    medical rovers are great if the signature is very very low so you can't make a fly over an detect it so easy all other ships even at distance you can easy track an are no use in Combat because you can see them within 5 km that need to be reduced to 1 km if its a small ship like cx8r or something like that so the ships an rovers can be useful in combat an the enemy team need to find them first to knuck the other team out of the park.

  • @cybee89
    @cybee89 4 місяці тому

    Right now the new update 3.32.1 got big problem like the maps and other 3 icons are gone. And the vultur you can't use the latter 😅

  • @frogger2011ify
    @frogger2011ify 4 місяці тому

    They will rush the game out so they don't get sued. They know they are at market cap (no new players to be had for this type of game) space games I. General have a small market

  • @werm69
    @werm69 4 місяці тому

    the last thing this game needs is another ship. Work on content, game loops, and stability so that people have stuff to actually do without getting bored in two weeks and leaving the game for months.

  • @latch9781
    @latch9781 4 місяці тому

    *"I think people are obsessing with modularity in Star Citizen a little too much"*
    -Mike while wearing a cap with a big 'ol *M* on it

  • @Krycius
    @Krycius 4 місяці тому

    No one in their right mind will fire 6 size 3's knowing most will miss, unless maybe their firing at Larger ships conny sized and bigger.

  • @SkintAlot
    @SkintAlot 4 місяці тому

    what if your respawn point was set at a tier of bed that cannot heal a higher tier of injury, so when you respawn you are on full health and no longer bleeding but you keep your injury until you get to a bed that is capable of healing that injury.

  • @NegativeProcess
    @NegativeProcess 4 місяці тому

    12 missiles and you can shoot 6 at a time, so u launch twice and now its a lack luster dog fighter? I cant see how thats "fun" for any kind of ship combat

  • @janschmid281
    @janschmid281 4 місяці тому

    I have seen a lot of saber raven on sale on other sites, ship code an whole accounts. Is this even allowed by cig, most other games ban you for buying accounts.

  • @seraph8672
    @seraph8672 4 місяці тому

    Dafuq we need another missile ship for? The ones we have aren’t worth a damn because missiles don’t work properly.

  • @Eneeki
    @Eneeki 4 місяці тому

    The Ursa medi-vac is awesome. It let me put a med bed into my daily flyer, the Spirit. This little vehicle just made that ship perfect!

  • @IamOmegon
    @IamOmegon 4 місяці тому

    I think there should be a limited amount of respawns per type of bed then give us something we have to refill or swap out on the medical bed to re-enable spawn

  • @deltaecho2621
    @deltaecho2621 4 місяці тому

    Jesus dude, God forbid other players get/have something you don’t and can’t readily get.

  • @kirillian777
    @kirillian777 4 місяці тому +1

    The saber raven. Looks like a wider avenger titan at the rear

  • @kennethjensen730
    @kennethjensen730 4 місяці тому

    Ive decided only to buy the back log of ships, until they are done, im not gonna spend a penny on another New ship.

  • @jirikrajnak9047
    @jirikrajnak9047 4 місяці тому

    it's apparent that our protagonist really does love the game, otherwise he wouldn't be as critical as he is.

  • @thomasinlondon2849
    @thomasinlondon2849 4 місяці тому

    I just had a look at the Medivac Ursa in-game. Fantastic texturing, the weathering is great.

  • @Ragecon87
    @Ragecon87 4 місяці тому

    Firebird gameplay shoot two volleys of rockets and then leave to a station to rearm…….. so bad

  • @makimera
    @makimera 4 місяці тому

    the medical ursa feels like they took the interior from the medical pices and just copied and pasted it into the ursa.

  • @ibes1508
    @ibes1508 4 місяці тому

    Gold standard raven aka remove landing lights and add cockpit buttons.... oh wow

  • @MontySaurusRex_
    @MontySaurusRex_ 4 місяці тому

    We don't need more punishments or consequences right now. The game is still too buggy.

  • @Synamatique
    @Synamatique 4 місяці тому

    if you respawn on a t3 medbed you should respawn with all of your t1 and 2 injuries
    an idea

  • @bnut1979
    @bnut1979 4 місяці тому

    So glad they got the Saber Raven gold pass done. /s Seriously, wtf....

  • @thomasjohansson779
    @thomasjohansson779 4 місяці тому

    Shall we take bets, this ship firebird gonna kick as under the sale, the next update nerf.

  • @Stayler17
    @Stayler17 4 місяці тому

    You're saying 1.0 is gonna come in 5 years?
    There's no way that's happening

  • @TacticalBeard
    @TacticalBeard 4 місяці тому

    I mean I’m still going to send out a beacon this will just mean more med ships are around for me to call

  • @mj_darkstar
    @mj_darkstar 4 місяці тому

    doesn't the change in med bed regenerating kill the medical profession game play?

  • @dvgese
    @dvgese 4 місяці тому

    So right about the gold standard. Bad form really, just to sell another ship.

  • @Haegemon
    @Haegemon 4 місяці тому

    I would have been happier with a gold standar for the Mustang and the Aurora.

  • @TokyoJim618
    @TokyoJim618 4 місяці тому

    I bet the contract doesn't include nurfing the ship to the point that makes it useless.

  • @allencareau4701
    @allencareau4701 4 місяці тому

    I agree best way to sale something is to say its shit lol firebird suck ....

  • @Dashfinite
    @Dashfinite 4 місяці тому

    Can't wait for the reaction to the Ursa Medivac trailer 🤣 Its so tonedeaf

  • @itsdibbles
    @itsdibbles 4 місяці тому

    Adjust the connie Andromeda missile controller, now plox