Great thumbnail. I have a 2013 Tesla model S with 162,000 miles on the original battery. Best car I’ve ever owned. By the way, I consider my old Tesla is a American muscle car, made in the USA and 450hp.
They featured zero examples of the stock Model S vehicles defeating everyone at the local dragstrip. I love some of those early Tesla vehicles that trolled the hotrod crowd; some were suffering from damaged ego because their gas-guzzling vehicles are inextricably linked to their self esteem.
@@Pieman62295 there are plenty of people documenting battery degradation & it's definitely an issue long term; all vehicles are money pits that wear out. If you compare gas savings & low maintenance of an EV to an ICE, it's basically a wash long term: the EV will be cheaper until you have to replace the battery, at that point it'll cost more to repair than the car is worth, similar to any major mechanical work on an ICE drivetrain.
@@Pieman62295 Just like an ICE losing compression as it ages BEVs will lose capacity as individual cells fail and get dropped from the pack voltage/capacity. It just shortens the range and possible the acceleration but it's still will operate like new. A battery failure is a lot less likely than an engine failure but it is just as catastrophic. But it's a lot easier to test batteries mounted to motors before they leave the factory than engines mated to transmissions.
There are a lot of us Tesla owners who bought the car not to be green or save money. We bought them for their sheer performance. The instant torque of these cars are hard to convey to a Dodge gearheads. They really just have to drive one on the track to experience it.
re: "There are a lot of us Tesla owners who bought the car not to be green or save money." the fire ravaged residents of Maui, Quebec, and Greece thank you for your selflessness, concern, and empathy.
@@phillyphil1513 not sure what you are getting at but please go find your empathy elsewhere. We are discussing the adaptation of electric cars and you are discussing hugging trees.
Nobody is attacking EV owners. You don't see some random tesla getting vandalized. All people ask is to have choice as to what they want to buy for their own lifestyle , without being forcefully shoved down their gullet. EV's are good , but let live some of us who like ICE cars.
Reporters must have missed the recent reports showing that the Tesla Semi is out performing expectations and is basically killing it. 1600 miles in 48 hours - loaded with Soda…
@@markmeridian3360 I think the way Pepsi uses the trucks they wouldn’t go 2000+ miles in 48 hours. For long haul team drivers you are absolutely right. For solo drivers I think they are ok, not great. As the batteries get better the ability to work for long haul will get better. But a vast majority of trucks drive under 400 miles per day. These would be fantastic for container drayage.
@@markmeridian3360Long Haul trucking is just the wrong use for BEV Semi Trucks and it's not end all be all of the truck industry. Day Cabs is a massive proportion of the industry and way more demand than any BEV truck maker can currently supply.
Tesla Model S Plaid. 1000 + HP. Game over. I don't have a Plaid, but a Model S 75D. I went from a Chrysler 300 C to this car. The Tesla is so much fun to drive. The other thing I like about EVs is the tech, basically an iPhone on wheels.
And they weigh 5000 pounds and take hours to charge. Under the right conditions. I have an Alfa 4C. It can go as far as the Plaid, on it's 45 litre fuel tank (which takes about two minutes to fill) but only weighs 2200 pounds. It's by all metrics a greener car that will last longer, was cheaper and doesn't explode. And now it's nine years old and has never gone wrong and is heading towards the time where the battery would be replaced on the Tesla. Gotta get those little brown kids digging. Game over.
@@jamesdanton9033 Plug the car in at night and unplug it in the morning. The time is less that that at a gas station. Also the fuel is free, from a solar roof.
@@fred2028 I don't need to benchmark anything. It IS reliable. And I don't have a family, so I don't and have never needed a minivan. Yes, it is a greener, lighter, more agile, more reliable, longer lasting car that looks better and costs less. Or you can have a heavy, unreliable, overly expensive car that takes half a day to charge that takes little kids digging in the dirt to make... and that explodes. Or if you need a four door for a family, there's a Camry. It will last until the end of time, be greener and is one tenth the cost. Yes, I look at electric car buyers as dimwits. The numbers don't add up and then, I have a Tesla destination charger at my business and I watch the fun people have with them.
It may have been possible for Tesla to make the Semis earlier but Tesla was battery constrained. The batteries simply were worth more in cars than in Semis.
All the initial specifications about range and cost were dependent on the successful production of the 4680 cells. This production has been dismal with many problems. Only now, years later, does it look like the 4680 cell may become cost effective. No definite news, but it appears to me that 4680 cell production was halted at Giga Austin and new equipment installed. I expect them to re-start soon, maybe we will get some good news at the next stockholders meeting in about a month.
@@royh6526 I'm not sure how to calculate cost effectiveness...maybe a low yeild of usable cells, no matter what their cost. But of course if you have to throw away a lot of cells to have enough for a car, you'd use cheaper cells instead. So not even enough for many Model Ys with structural battery packs let alone for Semis. But also...energy density of 4680 was not as high as they wanted. This is just my opinion based on various reports. It isn't just the Semis that were battery constrained. I think Megapacks were as well. I think now Tesla uses iron phosphate cells in those and is getting enough to scale up production.
HEY CNBC, try asking the younger generation if they would PREFER a Tesla or a Dodge and see how that survey turns out. Well, I am pretty sure CNBC will skew the results towards whatever company pays them the most advertising revenue.
Today's youth just want to drive a black Tesla wearing a black suit with black tie. Might as well replace humanity with robots, nobody could tell the difference.
@@noseboop4354Thats a lie when I go thru the drive thru w my Chally they say I like your car...I know them kids not saying that about a Tesla...because they always say dodge challenger or charger is my dream car
@@Avenue77 Oh, so because a few kids humor you with a compliment, that means the majority of millennials prefer to drive obsolete, dinosaurs? Lol, get real. Even the video said millennials prefer EVs.
@@SME5724 No. Why would you ask? China is the world's largest car market and demonstrates how BEV adoption will be exponential in other markets, as well.
@@H3erobrineNotch You should find this hard to believe, since the Tesla Model Y is the world's best selling car. Legacy auto, like VW claims, chips shortages, then lack of demand (funny since demand seems unlimited for good BEVs), and they lose money on every single BEV they make. No wonder they are cutting back and making excuses. Legacy auto is dead in the water.
I worked on my thesis on EVs in 1992-1993 at Chrysler Liberty and we had a functional EV minivan. And GM had its EV1. This tell you how many opportunities we have missed.
Car makers have to switch to EV's because their business is failing; nobody is going to want to own a car that drains them of their finances when they have affordable, reliable, and sustainable public transportation 🚲🚌🚋🚝🚃🚟🛤
I’m 28, everyone I know who are true car enthusiasts still absolutely adore v8s and straight 6s. We aren’t going anywhere. Nothing can replace the rumble and pops n bangs
They could’ve covered Tesla’s massive impact on the EV market instead of talking about companies that have yet to figure out how to produce these vehicles profitably. The charging infrastructure for Tesla will drastically improve in the next 12 months with legacy automakers funding Tesla’s superchargers!
I am not sure why you think owning an EV is stressful. It certainly hasn't been for me. Matter of fact when I drive my EV I feel like a teenager again driving for the first time, and I have been driving for almost 60 years. However, if I was still driving gas vehicles, gas prices certainly would stress and worry me. Not with an EV though, my cost to drive is just 2 cents per mile. How much are you paying for gas?
@@muskrat3291By admitting you own an electric car, you also let slip your income level, which probably has a lot more to do with your low stress than whatever car you drive.
Muscle cars were always about getting the most acceleration in the hands of the common person. Bang for the buck. EVs are a pretty good path to that goal with current technology, and it's only going to get better. I've owned a lot of fast ICE cars, but Electric is pretty awesome for going fast in a straight line, ngl. I really hope the Dodge EV cars do well. I hate that everything is a crossover now.
Having both a quick EV and a noise making fast car, the noise starts to lose its charm after driving an EV for a while. There are many cars that I look at now and they sound fast, but for many of these, the noise does not mean they are actually quick. Also, the noise is great occasionally, but not all of the time.
As an EV owner and owner of old muscle cars, I favor my EV's as not only does the noise get old so does the smells of a ICE power plant. I worry about what i do with my old muscle cars but i would take an EV over them all day long. @@sevenflashowls
EVER NOTICE how CNBC almost always shows OLDER TESLAS during their broadcasts?? Look at this thumbnail, it is a (2012-to-2015)-(version of the model-S), ANYONE THINK THAT IS ON PURPOSE?? Pay attention. 👀
Yeah, that's the first thing I noticed. They use of a photo that's over a decade old in a video about the future of EVs. CNBC is totally biased against Tesla. They also didn't bother mentioning Tesla's biggest selling, most proven EVs, but instead focused on their relatively unproven semi b/c it's easier to bash and spread doubt than Tesla's proven EV cars.
If you can afford a $80,000 ICE muscle car when gas gets to a price of $10/gal, more power to you. But EV's with home charging are cheaper to operate and getting cheaper to buy. EV's have introduced right sizing range requirements base your application. The vast majority of our cars spend more time parked between our short commutes to work and back, so massive range is a convenience not necessity.
@@capitalismftw They've been saying that for the last 15 years yet us ev owners are still driving around for pennies compared to others. And with evs you can charge them off peak hours which makes your bill even smaller.
You really are missing some important aspects of Tesla: Vertically integrated...way fewer suppliers. Direct sales. No dealers. Software design is at the heart of the company. Tesla designs their own computer chips and makes a lot of their own electronics. Tesla is way ahead in developing self driving. Tesla is working hard to make robotaxis possible soon. Tesla is a leader in AI and has built Dojo. (Look it up.) Tesla is developing humanoid robots. Tesla will be refining lithium soon. Tesla is a leader in battery cell inovations. (4680) Tesla has a worldwide 50,000 unit charging network. Tesla has made the construction of cars more efficient. And they will be pushing this further on the lower priced vehicle they will make soon. Tesla has an insurance company. Tesla is growing in the energy field...stationary storage, solar, distribution. Tesla can tap into scientific and engineering talent from SpaceX. Tesla has 20+ billion on hand and can raise more easily if needed...basically an unlimited budget to expand. Tesla EVs have high profit margins. Ford loses $32,000 per EV. It is believed that BYD is the only other company making a profit on EVs.
Big business thinks of people as sheep, it's easy to steer people in the direction you want, with just a few persuasive claims about EV's. ... Foolish people are followers
25:40 Craig Fuller has absolutely no idea what he's talking about. The claim that the established automakers have any advantage over Tesla is completely ridiculous.
Yes. All the items he claimed are advantages are disadvantages. How is having a network of maintenance shops an advantage when your fleet needs one fifth as much maintenance? This network is a massive fiscal drag. The same for a dealership network. Completely unnecessary cost structures. And worst of all is the archaic attitude that has not changed and weighs down their ability to adapt and change with maniacal urgency.
Wherever I go and happen to stumble across non-Tesla charging stations, they are ALL out of order. Broken down and apparently no effort to repair them.
I bought a used 2018 Kia Soul EV and I love it! The only time I pull into a gas station now is to drive around the pumps laughing maniacally with my finger in the air. I charge at home at night for 2 1/2 cents per kilowatthour and drive 35 miles a day for less than a dollar.
@@pardunmeesuh5612 2.5 cents/kwh is pretty good but I got you beat. All my power from 9p - 7a is free with my electric plan and I have solar panels plus home batteries that power me the rest of the day.
44 years of engineering in big auto world wide .50 years of tuning motorcycles. I want responsive machine that perform, that for me is only the electric motor. Remember when Milk Float and Golf Cart were the insult of choice for the EV..........................silence. I drive my 10 year old Tesla P85 bought new in 2014 now 141,000 miles and still the best car Ive ever had. I ride a Zero SRF electric motorbike the most responsive torque laden for weight bike out there. No ones saying electric slow anymore, motorsport trophy's next, keep your transmissions, noise run in "classic" race series.
Tesla had years of losses before they started making a profit, so the Big two will have to navigate those waters also. That being said, there will always be a market for stick shift ICE sports cars, just like there's a market for horses.
@@anydaynow01 the main difference is Tesla started from scratch though. and traditional ICE companies work on tiny profit margins, while Tesla doesn't. things like mass layoffs, long wars with unions, tearing down factories are not feasible, so they will need to completely rethink the way their companies use their current resources in order to reach good margins with EVs. it's a huge effort and will take a long time. while Tesla will use that time to just move their tech forward as they have no legacy issues to fix.
EVs are bad for the environment, because, we have to mine for the minerals to put into the batteries. The Mining vehicles that are used produce way more carbon emissions and will cause climate change to happen faster. Also what happens if you are out in the middle of nowhere where there are no charging stations, and your EV runs out of Battery power, you will be stuck out in the wilderness.
You may want to get yourself up to date about mining. The mining industry is converting to battery electric vehicles. All the major mining equipment manufactures such at Caterpillar, MacLean, Epiroc, Hitachi, Komatsu, GE, Liebherr, Volvo, etc., produce battery electric vehicles. The Copper Mountain mine in Canada uses haul trucks that run on electricity supplied by overhead trollies and they out perform the diesel trucks. A lithium mine, also in Canada, is due to begin production and it 100% battery electric, same with a nickel mine in Canada, 100% battery electric. Same with a many mines around the world. EVs don't suddenly run out of charge. Do you suddenly run out of gas? My EV displays the range in miles and it shows the amount of battery left, both graphically and as a percentage. It also displays the distance to the nearest charging station and constantly updates as I drive. And the NAV system will automatically alert me if I don't have enough charge to get to my destination and give me directions to the nearest charging station.
@@muskrat3291Actually that is not true. The mining vehicles will always be operating on Fossil fuels since they are out in the middle of nowhere where there is no charging available. Do some actual research, not fake research.
This video is a year old. They just reloaded it onto UA-cam or it took a year to get around to it. Typical news content, it is already outdated. The title is not accurate. They really do not cover who change will happen. It is just her is something EV and here is another thing EV. With the cutrent UAW strike, the unboxed production method Tesla is rolling out, less parts with EVs, and giga castings, the amount of labor needed is shrinking rapidly. When Teslabots get more developed, they will offer a logical alternative to himan labor in many jobs. Right now, it is race between China and Western nations and China is actually ahead in many ways, but Tesla gives us hope as they are already battling Chinese builders in China and succeeding. The US can be one energy independent via EVs. It is great that consumers can charge at home and that public charging stations can be built with solar, battery backup, and the charging station without need to be connected to the power grid. Change is happening and it will help protect the US economy as well create better military strength. Oil dependent military vehicles creates amajor weakness in our military.
It's an interesting thing about "sound," because all sound _is_ just causing air to vibrate in certain ways, and it would make sense that you could create some sort of "music box" that would project a sound exactly like a muscle car, using all "natural, physical motion," but without having an actual massive gasoline engine driving it.
The "fast & furious" kiddies have been doing that for years. They put a speaker on their 4-cylinder to make it sound like a V8. Kinda like vegans try to make their food look like real food.
@@That-Guy_We have to talk about the compromise. A gasoline engine with computer controlled, feedback fuel injection, exhaust gas recirculation, and exhaust gas catalysis were a good compromise that provided vastly cleaner air and even better fuel economy. The changes in the past 15 to 20 years have been chasing diminishing returns while inflating the first cost of cars and exploding the repair costs. The government really shouldn't be centrally planning energy consumption. It's not in the constitution. In the absence of CAFE, most passenger sedans would look like early 2000s Toyota Corollas in terms of powertrain technology.
@@gregorymalchuk272 They are not planning energy consumption per say, they are trying to reduce air pollution and CO2. When it comes to transportation the issue is ground level pollution. EVs output zero emissions at ground level whereas ICE output carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and unburned hydrocarbons that are health hazards that cause damage to the human respiratory tract and increase a person's vulnerability to, and the severity of, respiratory infections and asthma, nose, throat and lung irritation, coughing and shortness of breath. Exposure to fine particles can also affect lung function and worsen medical conditions such as asthma and heart disease.
Maybe CNBC can copy and paste the picture of a NEW TESLA for once (look at this thumbnail) or do they need more advertising revenue to stay in business??? Damn I bet it annoys the hell out of CNBC that Tesla did NOT go bankrupt and they are about to crush the rest of the automotive industry over the next decade. 😂
They even went out of their way to say EVs are so complicated to make, ignoring the fact that EVs have less parts & are actually easier to manufacture at scale. This is just an ad for anachronistic outdated ideas. They should introduce the new Dodge Dinosaur. 😂
@@Lovejazz01 General Motors viewed Tesla in 2009 as a "bunch of engineers playing with laptop batteries." They now have the number one selling vehicle Q1 2023, edging out the Toyota Corolla. Legacy auto can't pivot & make money; they lose money on every EV, & they only make money with ICE.
Great video! Well I'm so happy I made the best decisions by having a good investment. Recently, I'm able to acquire my third house even at my age and I believe if things keep going well I would retire early
That's nice! But how did you manage to achieve all that even with the current economy that's very bad? Please I'll appreciate your assistance on how to go about it, I'm desperately looking for a way to pay up my debts and also achieve my goals
The best strategy to use in trading is to trade with a professional who understands the market quite well, that way maximum profit is guaranteed, I'll highly recommend Katrina susan
Actually this is not the first time am hearing of Brenda Brown and her exploits, how she handles investments and generates good profits, she has really made a good name for her self, but I have no idea how to reach her
And now tell me how much emission produce private cars. That percentage is low compared to cargo trucks and industry, so we all try to change something that doesn’t really have a big impact and don’t think about things that does
@@zoobrizz -- given used prices I'm seeing, I wouldn't lose much on my euv yet. But, I don't care, as it's saving me so much on commuting I should have it paid off in a year, and then it'll keep saving me money.
The companies that already developed specialized electric vehicle platforms (Tesla, Volkswagen Group, Hyundai/Kia and surprisingly Geely/Volvo) early on have an advantage on everyone else because they could build a wider range of EV's to cater to various customer needs for EV's. That's why Mercedes-Benz has spent a fortune developing its own EV platform, GM is developing a range of vehicles around the _Ultium_ battery pack design, and even Toyota is spending a fortune to develop the dedicate TNGA-E platform for future EV's from that company.
Other than Tesla, all the companies are struggling, although Rivian is doing well. Toyota just wants to find a new format because they don't want to follow Tesla's lead. Between Hydro and your mentioned TNGA, they are throwing a lot of money in a hole.
a mercedes eqs is just a stitched together ev, it is so far inferior to tesla, just like all others. it is too hard for legacy to switch, most will evaporate.
What is Geely/Volvo? There's Volvo and there's Geely. Geely Holding owns Volvo but Volvo makes a different car brand than Geely Auto. Geely Holding produces the SEA platform and that's used by many brands, including Smart who is owned/designed by Mercedes. Volvo is having all sorts of problems getting their EX90 out and its sister the Polestar 3--both on the SPA2 platform, not SEA--(Polestar is an offshoot of Volvo, used to be its sports skunkworks).
@@JohnSmith-pn2vl I agree. EVs have to be done from a software first approach, legacy auto-makers are terrible at developing software. Wheels, seats, motors are just peripherals required for mobility that you control from one central processing software brain. We've been through all this when it was realised that the most important part of a computer, tablet, mobile phone is the operating system ( which is the reason Microsoft, Google and Apple became so successful ), now add cars to that list. For cars the only available operating system is from Tesla, they're building a fast growing moat that is becoming impossible for anyone else to bridge, including Apple.
@@floridahummer Compelling argument. I guess I will sell my EV that has saved me over $2,500 in the last 12 months and is the best car I have ever owned. 🤣
@@That-Guy_The EV premium is in the tens of thousands of dollars, especially when specialized repairs are involved. So you're technically tens of thousands of dollars in debt via opportunity cost relative to buying a used Toyota Corolla or Honda Civic and driving it until the wheels fall off.
@@gregorymalchuk272 The Model 3 ($40k) is classed as a Compact-Executive car. Other cars in that segment are Audi S4($55k) BMW M340i ($54k) Volvo S60 ($52k) Mercedes C300 ($45k) Lexus IS ($41k) Jaguar XE S ($40k) Genesis G70 ($40k) and Cadillac CT4 ($35k). So, it is actually well priced for its segment. My Model 3 has already saved me $3,800+ in fuel and maintenance over my old gas car in the 13 months I have had it.
All the other class 8 offerings are less than 300 miles of range. Tesla does not need any "Special" experience to sell commercial trucks that are a decade ahead of their competition and improving.
are you talking class 8 commericial trucks because i have a CDL and i can tell you that is completely laughable. the EV semis dont work efficiently at all.
@@andrewdonohue1853 So do I. And if you think that the trucking companies will not adjust their operations to take advantage of a truck with 450 miles of loaded range that costs 60% less to operate? You are nuts. Pepsi in California is already proving they can run their trucks 18hours a day with only a single one hour charging session in the middle. Besides which the Tesla Semi is already being tested with the FSD Beta in house today. Tesla has their own fleet that is shuttling batteries and drive trains from Nevada to Fremont and back hauling raw resources to the Nevada plant.
@@andrewdonohue1853 A diesel drive train less than 28% efficiency at peak performance. The rest of the energy in the fuel is lost to friction and heat dissipation. An EV drive train is around 92% efficiency. It also has the ability to recoup energy as it travels. The reason why is because every time you back off the throttle in a traditional truck, the energy is lost through mechanical back pressure. Whereas in an EV that energy is put back into the batteries. Its even to the point where Featherlite has a 53' test dry van today that has solar roof and walls, its own battery and drive train onboard. It operates off a digital strain gauge on the pin to control the trailer speed/regenerative braking.
@@davefroman4700 that's a lie. Power must be generated at a generating station which is at a location remote from the charging location. Do you understand wire resistance, the longer the wire the more the resistance and loss. The resistance and voltage generate heat, which in turn increases resistance.... wires are less efficient in hot weather. 92% is a flat out lie. If you think batteries are going to run a commercial truck efficiently you're lying to yourself. Not only do you have the electric generation and electric transportation losses, the truck would be required to haul the batteries... instead of a few hundred pounds of diesel fuel your talking thousands of pounds of batteries, i believe maybe as much as 10k lbs of batteries. That is an energy loss you will not get back. I have a CDL and I'm typing this from. The cab of a kenworth diesel truck
@@Simon-dm8zvJust give him a few more years. Once the infrastructure is up and he figures out how much money he will be saving he'll be switching real fast lol
so they put horses head on a carriages so it wouldn’t spook the other horses. So this analogy is,so EV makes engine noises so I wouldn’t spook the other muscle cars.
I dont see any Tesla cars in the video except for trucks, that is weird . somehow most of the media hate Elon, how the hell u are talking about electric cars and not showing tesla cars in the video most of the time. Not a single company that you mentioned in the report comes even close to Tesla.
I'm still puzzled with 2 things Rivian did not do - build their platform on 800V and not give more extensive & flexible power export options along the lines of what Ford did with the F-150 Lightning
Just a reminder in California they plan on banning all Gasoline Cars by 2035. Considering how many people are leaving California I can't really blame them.
21:48 all of the large shopping centers with large parking lots should install solar panel canopies on their parking lots. 1. it reduces the exposure of vehicles to direct sunlight, so the cars dont become friggin ovens and as a result, use less energy to cool the car. 2. you use the land that would otherwise be doing nothing to produce energy which would help reduce energy costs. 3. the electricity from the PVs can help power charging stations for EVs.
My Dad bought an '85 Corvette which I drove anytime anywhere I wanted no questions asked. At the time it was an expensive car. It was brand new, cost 25,000 and 6,500 a year to insure it for me..a 16 yo teen. A house cost around 40,000 at that time. Wow, corvettes cost more than half of the price of buying a house. Wow...😳
Fleet is going to show efficiency and maintenance advantages of eVs where cost-benefit is key. I love seeing the Amazon-Rivian delivery vans out in the wild this year.
I understand the objection to E.V.’s based on price, or because you rent and can’t install a level 2 charger, but otherwise, or if you have specific use cases, but I think a lot of it is because people just don’t know any better. I currently have an ‘09 Z06 Corvette with a (modified) 575 rwhp, roughly 650 at the motor, but I’m leaning toward buying an E.V. next year. I’ll just address complaints I’ve seen, some of which used to be what I also believed were problems. Hours of charging? Yep, in my garage - I don’t have to do my weekly gas station visits. Heavy? Yes, which means a slightly lower tire life. It also won’t be a track car like my Corvette. I’m OK with that if the replacement E.V. has the right qualities. The E.V.’s I’m looking at accelerate much faster than my Corvette, so that quality will satisfy me. Too little range? I used to think this, but in looking back at actual long trips I’ve taken, I’m pretty sure I’ve never driven more than ~3 hours without taking a break to use the bathroom and eat. So, at a 70 mph average, that means a real 300 mile range would be fine for my worst case long distance travel. Catching fire? The data show that when E.V.’s catch fire, it’s BAD, but the data also show that they actually catch fire about 1/50th as often as ICE cars. Yes, it’s skewed by old ICE cars, which may be the majority of those cars that catch fire. But it’s still true that E.V.’s catch fire FAR less often that ICE vehicles.
@@noseboop4354 - Absolutely true, for now., that’s why it was the 2nd objection I listed, “or because you rent”. In any case, as E.V. purchases increase I suspect employers will start increasing charging stations, so it become natural to charge during the 8’ish hours you’re at work. In California, for instance, in the 1st quarter of this year E.V.’s made up 25% of new car purchases. I’m now retired, but where I used to work in Arizona a bit over 2 years ago my employer had installed about 2 dozen chargers - but that was for around 1000 people - so a low adoption rate. I also expect that even rentals will start getting chargers, whether it’s an apartment complex or houses.
I travel for work. There's no way I'd purchase an EV. I'm not going to be sitting at a charging station for 40 minutes or better. They aren't feasible for me at all.
@@billbillerton6122 - If you drive for more than 3 to 4 hours at a time without taking a break to eat or go to the bathroom, an E.V. clearly won’t work for you. It also depends on where you live, because many rural locations have poor charging infrastructure. On the other hand, more and more charging stations are being installed at hotel, specifically for travelers like you. Here’s an example from an article I read about Hilton Hotels: Hilton to Add 20,000 Tesla Chargers to Its Hotels Across North America The hotel company has teamed up with Tesla to add 20,000 Universal Wall Connectors at 2,000 Hilton hotel properties throughout the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.
You're silly Z06 will be quite the boat anchor when everyone's trying to charge their EVs all at once, The grid is already maxed out stupid..you're all done driving punk😢
@@OtisFlint V12 is alpha still (i.e., not available to the public). Apparently the move from heuristics & partial net to a pure neutral net, has been transformative. Many quite like v11.+ but it's unfortunate you had bad experiences. I believe FSD will hit a tipping point (soon), like most AI, all of a sudden go from good or even poor, to outstanding, then very soon after, superhuman. That's exponentiality for ya. ;^)
The "OEM's" will be a hurdle for ICE manufactures that they may not overcome along with all the debt they carry. So I think this is a prime opportunity for more start ups like TESLA ect...to become the new BIG 3 or more....the old big 3 have reached their life expectancy.
Yep, the vast majority of legacy automakers will go bankrupt, as accelerated by the UAW. Startups like Rivian are on shaky ground, unfortunately. Lucid is a pump and dump. Even Tesla almost went out of business. Like it or not, the future of the auto industry is 90% Tesla and Chinese cars.
CNBC appeals to mostly older people and they HATE TESLA!! Most older people (I am 56) will stay either stubborn or uninformed until they either die or unwillingly switch because the average Tesla will be much cheaper and the financial benefits will almost always “win-out”.
NOt about age. I know people in their 20s that hate TEsla because some people just don't like Tesla. Doesn't mean they don't like other BEVS. Tesla isn't the only BEV to consider.
Why would the type of motor be an issue. Most people want to get there. The most significant auto development for boomers is autonomy. When my mother could no longer drive she lost her independence. She died less the 2 years after. Hope and purpose are crucial to life. Autonomy will deliver this long after the elderly lose the ability to drive. That's MILLIONS of people with improved quality if life. I don't think that can be ignored.
EVs shouldnt have been left out of politics. 2 and a half decades in the car industry and am a fully certified senior master for Ford. I fully trust the evs, have worked on high voltage batteries etc. They are good but ask the public and you would think they bought one and it broke.
I dont understand why dodge just doesnt just put their inline 6 twin turbo into the charger & challenger as well as offer something new with an SRT 4 engine (turbo 4 banger but more power maybe 300hp). they used to offer the Neon SRT 4 back in the day
Yup. The moment obvious Chinese EV manufacturers start selling stateside …. Tesla and other US EV makers better up their game. I said ‘obvious’ china manufacturers because Volvo EVs are Chinese owned.
You can absolutely continue to drive gas and diesel muscle cars as long as there is still gas and diesel to fuel them which should be for a quite a long time, certainly many decades. The transition means new ones won't be built, but classics can still be driven.
To your claim that electric trucks are much heavier than diesels.. proove it! According to Tesla the weight penalty is less than 1 ton… and steadily improving
Why using a 2010 model S in the thumbnail? Think we don't know? 🤣
Great thumbnail. I have a 2013 Tesla model S with 162,000 miles on the original battery. Best car I’ve ever owned. By the way, I consider my old Tesla is a American muscle car, made in the USA and 450hp.
They featured zero examples of the stock Model S vehicles defeating everyone at the local dragstrip. I love some of those early Tesla vehicles that trolled the hotrod crowd; some were suffering from damaged ego because their gas-guzzling vehicles are inextricably linked to their self esteem.
how is the battery aging? I'm curious how much of the original capacity it still has after ten years.
Don't buy anything this liar is saying or selling.
@@Pieman62295 there are plenty of people documenting battery degradation & it's definitely an issue long term; all vehicles are money pits that wear out. If you compare gas savings & low maintenance of an EV to an ICE, it's basically a wash long term: the EV will be cheaper until you have to replace the battery, at that point it'll cost more to repair than the car is worth, similar to any major mechanical work on an ICE drivetrain.
@@Pieman62295 Just like an ICE losing compression as it ages BEVs will lose capacity as individual cells fail and get dropped from the pack voltage/capacity. It just shortens the range and possible the acceleration but it's still will operate like new. A battery failure is a lot less likely than an engine failure but it is just as catastrophic. But it's a lot easier to test batteries mounted to motors before they leave the factory than engines mated to transmissions.
Guy with a hanger full of old cars taking about being practical🤣
lol
If you’re practical long enough you end up with a lot of money to spend
There are a lot of us Tesla owners who bought the car not to be green or save money. We bought them for their sheer performance. The instant torque of these cars are hard to convey to a Dodge gearheads. They really just have to drive one on the track to experience it.
OKaàý Bôõméř
Speed and quickness without the noise. Some prefer noise.
ice cars are slow@@snookmeister55
re: "There are a lot of us Tesla owners who bought the car not to be green or save money." the fire ravaged residents of Maui, Quebec, and Greece thank you for your selflessness, concern, and empathy.
@@phillyphil1513 not sure what you are getting at but please go find your empathy elsewhere. We are discussing the adaptation of electric cars and you are discussing hugging trees.
First they laugh at you, then they attack you, then they join you.
Elizabeth
Just like superchargers
the attacking part is the roughest
@@sew_gal7340 but with they attack you. You know your are doing something right.
Nobody is attacking EV owners. You don't see some random tesla getting vandalized. All people ask is to have choice as to what they want to buy for their own lifestyle , without being forcefully shoved down their gullet. EV's are good , but let live some of us who like ICE cars.
Reporters must have missed the recent reports showing that the Tesla Semi is out performing expectations and is basically killing it. 1600 miles in 48 hours - loaded with Soda…
That video was from earlier this year.
@@markmeridian3360 I think the way Pepsi uses the trucks they wouldn’t go 2000+ miles in 48 hours. For long haul team drivers you are absolutely right. For solo drivers I think they are ok, not great. As the batteries get better the ability to work for long haul will get better. But a vast majority of trucks drive under 400 miles per day. These would be fantastic for container drayage.
@@markmeridian3360Long Haul trucking is just the wrong use for BEV Semi Trucks and it's not end all be all of the truck industry. Day Cabs is a massive proportion of the industry and way more demand than any BEV truck maker can currently supply.
Tesla old batteries have 2000 cycle life and new ones 6000
Hyrdogen trucks go further faster charging and better trucks. All are gimmicks IMO
Tesla Model S Plaid. 1000 + HP. Game over. I don't have a Plaid, but a Model S 75D. I went from a Chrysler 300 C to this car. The Tesla is so much fun to drive. The other thing I like about EVs is the tech, basically an iPhone on wheels.
And they weigh 5000 pounds and take hours to charge. Under the right conditions. I have an Alfa 4C. It can go as far as the Plaid, on it's 45 litre fuel tank (which takes about two minutes to fill) but only weighs 2200 pounds. It's by all metrics a greener car that will last longer, was cheaper and doesn't explode. And now it's nine years old and has never gone wrong and is heading towards the time where the battery would be replaced on the Tesla. Gotta get those little brown kids digging.
Game over.
@@jamesdanton9033
Plug the car in at night and unplug it in the morning. The time is less that that at a gas station. Also the fuel is free, from a solar roof.
@@jamesdanton9033 did you honestly compare a 2 seater car to a family sedan? And use Alfa as a benchmark for long term reliability?
@@fred2028he didn't think that through.
@@fred2028 I don't need to benchmark anything. It IS reliable. And I don't have a family, so I don't and have never needed a minivan. Yes, it is a greener, lighter, more agile, more reliable, longer lasting car that looks better and costs less.
Or you can have a heavy, unreliable, overly expensive car that takes half a day to charge that takes little kids digging in the dirt to make... and that explodes. Or if you need a four door for a family, there's a Camry. It will last until the end of time, be greener and is one tenth the cost.
Yes, I look at electric car buyers as dimwits. The numbers don't add up and then, I have a Tesla destination charger at my business and I watch the fun people have with them.
It may have been possible for Tesla to make the Semis earlier but Tesla was battery constrained. The batteries simply were worth more in cars than in Semis.
Cause regulatory credits an grandfathers failing grid
@@sparkysho-ze7nmWhat do you mean?
All the initial specifications about range and cost were dependent on the successful production of the 4680 cells. This production has been dismal with many problems. Only now, years later, does it look like the 4680 cell may become cost effective. No definite news, but it appears to me that 4680 cell production was halted at Giga Austin and new equipment installed. I expect them to re-start soon, maybe we will get some good news at the next stockholders meeting in about a month.
@@royh6526 I'm not sure how to calculate cost effectiveness...maybe a low yeild of usable cells, no matter what their cost. But of course if you have to throw away a lot of cells to have enough for a car, you'd use cheaper cells instead.
So not even enough for many Model Ys with structural battery packs let alone for Semis. But also...energy density of 4680 was not as high as they wanted. This is just my opinion based on various reports.
It isn't just the Semis that were battery constrained. I think Megapacks were as well. I think now Tesla uses iron phosphate cells in those and is getting enough to scale up production.
@@sparkysho-ze7nm Bunch of Insane nonsense. Tesla was struck off Federal EV tax rebate during that Semi Truck battery shortage problem.
Love or hate Tesla no matter what Tesla is King
HEY CNBC, try asking the younger generation if they would PREFER a Tesla or a Dodge and see how that survey turns out. Well, I am pretty sure CNBC will skew the results towards whatever company pays them the most advertising revenue.
shills will shill
Today's youth just want to drive a black Tesla wearing a black suit with black tie. Might as well replace humanity with robots, nobody could tell the difference.
@@noseboop4354Thats a lie when I go thru the drive thru w my Chally they say I like your car...I know them kids not saying that about a Tesla...because they always say dodge challenger or charger is my dream car
@@noseboop4354 Suits look cool asf, much better than jeans and t shirt
@@Avenue77 Oh, so because a few kids humor you with a compliment, that means the majority of millennials prefer to drive obsolete, dinosaurs? Lol, get real. Even the video said millennials prefer EVs.
EVs aren't selling. Look at the numbers. Many manufacturers are considering ditching them.
The Tesla Model Y is the world's best selling car. In China, BEVs currently have 24% market share and it's increasing exponentially.
@@machoopichoo2 you live in China ?
@@SME5724 No. Why would you ask? China is the world's largest car market and demonstrates how BEV adoption will be exponential in other markets, as well.
Link a article, I find this hard to believe.
@@H3erobrineNotch You should find this hard to believe, since the Tesla Model Y is the world's best selling car. Legacy auto, like VW claims, chips shortages, then lack of demand (funny since demand seems unlimited for good BEVs), and they lose money on every single BEV they make. No wonder they are cutting back and making excuses. Legacy auto is dead in the water.
California asked EV owners to limit their driving because the grid can not keep up. Fantastic yeah.
I worked on my thesis on EVs in 1992-1993 at Chrysler Liberty and we had a functional EV minivan. And GM had its EV1. This tell you how many opportunities we have missed.
Car makers have to switch to EV's because their business is failing; nobody is going to want to own a car that drains them of their finances when they have affordable, reliable, and sustainable public transportation 🚲🚌🚋🚝🚃🚟🛤
FUEL SUX!
No, it doesn't.
The world's first EV was made in the 1830s. Before gas or diesel cars.
ford was making EVS wow .. well over 100 years ago now. and was blackballed by GM. sabotaged by oil industry really
Regarding the Dodge enthusiasts, these old guys won't be around forever and their old ideas will die out
I'm glad for that.
Ford lost billions researching EVs and autonomous vehicles. Thank God they seen the light and stopped it.@@anthonybha4510
I’m 28, everyone I know who are true car enthusiasts still absolutely adore v8s and straight 6s. We aren’t going anywhere. Nothing can replace the rumble and pops n bangs
They could’ve covered Tesla’s massive impact on the EV market instead of talking about companies that have yet to figure out how to produce these vehicles profitably. The charging infrastructure for Tesla will drastically improve in the next 12 months with legacy automakers funding Tesla’s superchargers!
The Media hate Elon, personally I dont know why
Doctors say, ... if you want to live a long health life, stress free and without worry, ... then never, ... ever, .. ever buy an .. Electric Vehicle.
I am not sure why you think owning an EV is stressful. It certainly hasn't been for me. Matter of fact when I drive my EV I feel like a teenager again driving for the first time, and I have been driving for almost 60 years. However, if I was still driving gas vehicles, gas prices certainly would stress and worry me. Not with an EV though, my cost to drive is just 2 cents per mile. How much are you paying for gas?
What doctors? All doctors? Even the ones who drive EVs with a big smile on their face? What is your source?
@@muskrat3291By admitting you own an electric car, you also let slip your income level, which probably has a lot more to do with your low stress than whatever car you drive.
Muscle cars were always about getting the most acceleration in the hands of the common person. Bang for the buck. EVs are a pretty good path to that goal with current technology, and it's only going to get better. I've owned a lot of fast ICE cars, but Electric is pretty awesome for going fast in a straight line, ngl. I really hope the Dodge EV cars do well. I hate that everything is a crossover now.
The sole complaint of EVs is the lack of noise. But in terms of straight line speed, EVs destroy muscle cars
Eventually they will converge at a cheaper price for the same power/performance as an ICE, just from being simpler mechanically
Check Tesla model S Plaid (1000Hp) on NürnburgRing🏁Germany🏁🏎️
Having both a quick EV and a noise making fast car, the noise starts to lose its charm after driving an EV for a while. There are many cars that I look at now and they sound fast, but for many of these, the noise does not mean they are actually quick. Also, the noise is great occasionally, but not all of the time.
As an EV owner and owner of old muscle cars, I favor my EV's as not only does the noise get old so does the smells of a ICE power plant. I worry about what i do with my old muscle cars but i would take an EV over them all day long. @@sevenflashowls
I may be tripping, but did they do a video on this already?
I may be high but I think you’re right
yea they did. the channel is recycling content
yea all old stuff
ye i feel like I've seen this vid before
Some need to take that guy for a ride in a plaid.
EVER NOTICE how CNBC almost always shows OLDER TESLAS during their broadcasts?? Look at this thumbnail, it is a (2012-to-2015)-(version of the model-S), ANYONE THINK THAT IS ON PURPOSE?? Pay attention. 👀
Yeah, that's the first thing I noticed. They use of a photo that's over a decade old in a video about the future of EVs. CNBC is totally biased against Tesla. They also didn't bother mentioning Tesla's biggest selling, most proven EVs, but instead focused on their relatively unproven semi b/c it's easier to bash and spread doubt than Tesla's proven EV cars.
Well, they ARE owned by Ford so...
Putting all eggs in one basket will doom all car manufacturers , power needs to be diversified, multiple sources
Why is that? It had 0 diversification for a long time.
If you can afford a $80,000 ICE muscle car when gas gets to a price of $10/gal, more power to you.
But EV's with home charging are cheaper to operate and getting cheaper to buy.
EV's have introduced right sizing range requirements base your application.
The vast majority of our cars spend more time parked between our short commutes to work and back, so massive range is a convenience not necessity.
thats exactly the point@@intothemoat
when there is no option but electric, it will cost the same for charging lol you'd have to be naive to think otherwise @@IMGreg..
@@capitalismftw They've been saying that for the last 15 years yet us ev owners are still driving around for pennies compared to others. And with evs you can charge them off peak hours which makes your bill even smaller.
You really are missing some important aspects of Tesla:
Vertically integrated...way fewer suppliers.
Direct sales. No dealers.
Software design is at the heart of the company.
Tesla designs their own computer chips and makes a lot of their own electronics.
Tesla is way ahead in developing self driving. Tesla is working hard to make robotaxis possible soon.
Tesla is a leader in AI and has built Dojo. (Look it up.)
Tesla is developing humanoid robots.
Tesla will be refining lithium soon.
Tesla is a leader in battery cell inovations. (4680)
Tesla has a worldwide 50,000 unit charging network.
Tesla has made the construction of cars more efficient. And they will be pushing this further on the lower priced vehicle they will make soon.
Tesla has an insurance company.
Tesla is growing in the energy field...stationary storage, solar, distribution.
Tesla can tap into scientific and engineering talent from SpaceX.
Tesla has 20+ billion on hand and can raise more easily if needed...basically an unlimited budget to expand.
Tesla EVs have high profit margins. Ford loses $32,000 per EV. It is believed that BYD is the only other company making a profit on EVs.
Yep, gotta love the old stealerships.
Big business thinks of people as sheep, it's easy to steer people in the direction you want, with just a few persuasive claims about EV's. ... Foolish people are followers
Persuasive, steering. Do you mean how this video had gloom and doom music playing the entire time?
Well for most people's use cases EVs are the better option.
25:40 Craig Fuller has absolutely no idea what he's talking about. The claim that the established automakers have any advantage over Tesla is completely ridiculous.
correct
Yes. All the items he claimed are advantages are disadvantages. How is having a network of maintenance shops an advantage when your fleet needs one fifth as much maintenance? This network is a massive fiscal drag. The same for a dealership network. Completely unnecessary cost structures. And worst of all is the archaic attitude that has not changed and weighs down their ability to adapt and change with maniacal urgency.
@@kevinaschim8475 Yep, + massive debt, stealerships that add cost and everyone hates, incompetence, bureaucracy, etc.
Wherever I go and happen to stumble across non-Tesla charging stations, they are ALL out of order. Broken down and apparently no effort to repair them.
Nobody wanted EV's,we are forced to buy them
if nobody wanted them then no one would buy them. gas cars are still on sale you know right
I wanted them, have one and will never go back to a gas car.
Speak for yourself. I couldn't wait to get one -and the government incentives ensure that we, as a nation keep up with the world.
Volvo just announced it was pulling out of EVs and their stock soared 20% overnight!
Electric cars are a fad that will fade away in a few years.
🤣 no, I am never going back to gas cars and most people that by an EV feel the same.
I bought a used 2018 Kia Soul EV and I love it! The only time I pull into a gas station now is to drive around the pumps laughing maniacally with my finger in the air. I charge at home at night for 2 1/2 cents per kilowatthour and drive 35 miles a day for less than a dollar.
@@pardunmeesuh5612
2.5 cents/kwh is pretty good but I got you beat. All my power from 9p - 7a is free with my electric plan and I have solar panels plus home batteries that power me the rest of the day.
I've heard the same dinosaurs complain about moving from carbs to fuel injection back in the 80's. Technology moves on but some people don't.
We got rid of our EV ,best thing we ever did !!
I will never buy an electronic car.
I like how fast electric cars sound too
I dig hauling ass and no one knows unless they see me. Making a bunch of racket seems stupid once you get use to the stealthness of no sound.
44 years of engineering in big auto world wide .50 years of tuning motorcycles. I want responsive machine that perform, that for me is only the electric motor. Remember when Milk Float and Golf Cart were the insult of choice for the EV..........................silence. I drive my 10 year old Tesla P85 bought new in 2014 now 141,000 miles and still the best car Ive ever had. I ride a Zero SRF electric motorbike the most responsive torque laden for weight bike out there. No ones saying electric slow anymore, motorsport trophy's next, keep your transmissions, noise run in "classic" race series.
Well done!
Difficult. Big brands that have been building ICE vehicles for decades are making losses having to switch to EV's
they are used to losses so nothing changes really
EV = AV Anxiety Vehicle. Hybrid ❤️
Tesla had years of losses before they started making a profit, so the Big two will have to navigate those waters also. That being said, there will always be a market for stick shift ICE sports cars, just like there's a market for horses.
@@zoobrizzhybrids are no the solution
@@anydaynow01 the main difference is Tesla started from scratch though. and traditional ICE companies work on tiny profit margins, while Tesla doesn't. things like mass layoffs, long wars with unions, tearing down factories are not feasible, so they will need to completely rethink the way their companies use their current resources in order to reach good margins with EVs. it's a huge effort and will take a long time. while Tesla will use that time to just move their tech forward as they have no legacy issues to fix.
23:55 Pepsi wouldn't allow us to interview the drivers.... But they TOTALLY love it!😅😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
EVs are bad for the environment, because, we have to mine for the minerals to put into the batteries. The Mining vehicles that are used produce way more carbon emissions and will cause climate change to happen faster. Also what happens if you are out in the middle of nowhere where there are no charging stations, and your EV runs out of Battery power, you will be stuck out in the wilderness.
You may want to get yourself up to date about mining. The mining industry is converting to battery electric vehicles. All the major mining equipment manufactures such at Caterpillar, MacLean, Epiroc, Hitachi, Komatsu, GE, Liebherr, Volvo, etc., produce battery electric vehicles. The Copper Mountain mine in Canada uses haul trucks that run on electricity supplied by overhead trollies and they out perform the diesel trucks. A lithium mine, also in Canada, is due to begin production and it 100% battery electric, same with a nickel mine in Canada, 100% battery electric. Same with a many mines around the world.
EVs don't suddenly run out of charge. Do you suddenly run out of gas? My EV displays the range in miles and it shows the amount of battery left, both graphically and as a percentage. It also displays the distance to the nearest charging station and constantly updates as I drive. And the NAV system will automatically alert me if I don't have enough charge to get to my destination and give me directions to the nearest charging station.
@@muskrat3291Actually that is not true. The mining vehicles will always be operating on Fossil fuels since they are out in the middle of nowhere where there is no charging available. Do some actual research, not fake research.
Because batteries are recycled at end of life the materials only need to be mined once. Oil is a single use fuel that must be constantly extracted.
@@That-Guy_Actually you have to mine for the minerals multiple times, because the batteries only last for a certain amount of mileage.
@@johnantal2014
Batteries are recyclable. Also the current generation of EV batteries last 300k+ miles. LFP batteries are good for 500k+ miles.
This is an old re-upload I remember from a year ago.
This video is a year old. They just reloaded it onto UA-cam or it took a year to get around to it.
Typical news content, it is already outdated.
The title is not accurate. They really do not cover who change will happen. It is just her is something EV and here is another thing EV.
With the cutrent UAW strike, the unboxed production method Tesla is rolling out, less parts with EVs, and giga castings, the amount of labor needed is shrinking rapidly. When Teslabots get more developed, they will offer a logical alternative to himan labor in many jobs.
Right now, it is race between China and Western nations and China is actually ahead in many ways, but Tesla gives us hope as they are already battling Chinese builders in China and succeeding.
The US can be one energy independent via EVs. It is great that consumers can charge at home and that public charging stations can be built with solar, battery backup, and the charging station without need to be connected to the power grid.
Change is happening and it will help protect the US economy as well create better military strength. Oil dependent military vehicles creates amajor weakness in our military.
Don't waste time with EV TRUCKS !
I will always keep diesel FOR EVER
It's an interesting thing about "sound," because all sound _is_ just causing air to vibrate in certain ways, and it would make sense that you could create some sort of "music box" that would project a sound exactly like a muscle car, using all "natural, physical motion," but without having an actual massive gasoline engine driving it.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
just sell the fools mp3s
That's what Toyota already does; but it looks so increasingly childish and ridiculous, can't help it.
The "fast & furious" kiddies have been doing that for years. They put a speaker on their 4-cylinder to make it sound like a V8. Kinda like vegans try to make their food look like real food.
It’ll never be real. Hearing a v8 roar and the turbochargers spool up and flutter is an experience that cannot be replicated with electric cars.
The only time I will be forced to buy an electric car is when the planet runs out of oil. So until then adios!!!😅😂
I’m glad to see how Steve-O turned his life around 🙌
We should have a choice as to what we want to drive. Our choices are being taken away.
And you don't have the choice to put leaded gas in your car at the pump now. But sometimes it's good to not have some options if they cause harm.
@@That-Guy_yup
@@That-Guy_We have to talk about the compromise. A gasoline engine with computer controlled, feedback fuel injection, exhaust gas recirculation, and exhaust gas catalysis were a good compromise that provided vastly cleaner air and even better fuel economy. The changes in the past 15 to 20 years have been chasing diminishing returns while inflating the first cost of cars and exploding the repair costs. The government really shouldn't be centrally planning energy consumption. It's not in the constitution. In the absence of CAFE, most passenger sedans would look like early 2000s Toyota Corollas in terms of powertrain technology.
@@gregorymalchuk272
They are not planning energy consumption per say, they are trying to reduce air pollution and CO2. When it comes to transportation the issue is ground level pollution. EVs output zero emissions at ground level whereas ICE output carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and unburned hydrocarbons that are health hazards that cause damage to the human respiratory tract and increase a person's vulnerability to, and the severity of, respiratory infections and asthma, nose, throat and lung irritation, coughing and shortness of breath. Exposure to fine particles can also affect lung function and worsen medical conditions such as asthma and heart disease.
Maybe CNBC can copy and paste the picture of a NEW TESLA for once (look at this thumbnail) or do they need more advertising revenue to stay in business??? Damn I bet it annoys the hell out of CNBC that Tesla did NOT go bankrupt and they are about to crush the rest of the automotive industry over the next decade. 😂
They even went out of their way to say EVs are so complicated to make, ignoring the fact that EVs have less parts & are actually easier to manufacture at scale. This is just an ad for anachronistic outdated ideas. They should introduce the new Dodge Dinosaur. 😂
Legacy media hates Tesla because they need monopoly platforms to algorithmiclly promote their content, and X doesn't do that.
I came here to say that also, the thumbnail they used they want everyone to think that Tesla never made anything past the original Model S.
@@Lovejazz01 General Motors viewed Tesla in 2009 as a "bunch of engineers playing with laptop batteries." They now have the number one selling vehicle Q1 2023, edging out the Toyota Corolla. Legacy auto can't pivot & make money; they lose money on every EV, & they only make money with ICE.
Great video! Well I'm so happy I made the best decisions by having a good investment. Recently, I'm able to acquire my third house even at my age and I believe if things keep going well I would retire early
That's nice! But how did you manage to achieve all that even with the current economy that's very bad? Please I'll appreciate your assistance on how to go about it, I'm desperately looking for a way to pay up my debts and also achieve my goals
The best strategy to use in trading is to trade with a professional who understands the market quite well, that way maximum profit is guaranteed, I'll highly recommend Katrina susan
Actually this is not the first time am hearing of Brenda Brown and her exploits, how she handles investments and generates good profits, she has really made a good name for her self, but I have no idea how to reach her
gram
Brendabrown is the name to look for
And now tell me how much emission produce private cars. That percentage is low compared to cargo trucks and industry, so we all try to change something that doesn’t really have a big impact and don’t think about things that does
Private vehicles produce 18% of emissions from the Transportation sector. It is a significant number.
My Bolt is a great commuter, and surprisingly quick and comfortable for one of the least-expensive EVs on the market.
Bought an EUV last year. Works fine. No need for more. Spending this kind of money just to get around is insane.
My neighbor purchased one. It depreciated by 50% in 2 years.
@@zoobrizz -- given used prices I'm seeing, I wouldn't lose much on my euv yet. But, I don't care, as it's saving me so much on commuting I should have it paid off in a year, and then it'll keep saving me money.
The companies that already developed specialized electric vehicle platforms (Tesla, Volkswagen Group, Hyundai/Kia and surprisingly Geely/Volvo) early on have an advantage on everyone else because they could build a wider range of EV's to cater to various customer needs for EV's. That's why Mercedes-Benz has spent a fortune developing its own EV platform, GM is developing a range of vehicles around the _Ultium_ battery pack design, and even Toyota is spending a fortune to develop the dedicate TNGA-E platform for future EV's from that company.
Other than Tesla, all the companies are struggling, although Rivian is doing well. Toyota just wants to find a new format because they don't want to follow Tesla's lead. Between Hydro and your mentioned TNGA, they are throwing a lot of money in a hole.
a mercedes eqs is just a stitched together ev, it is so far inferior to tesla, just like all others. it is too hard for legacy to switch, most will evaporate.
Ultium is garbage based on the teardowns folks have done.
What is Geely/Volvo? There's Volvo and there's Geely. Geely Holding owns Volvo but Volvo makes a different car brand than Geely Auto. Geely Holding produces the SEA platform and that's used by many brands, including Smart who is owned/designed by Mercedes. Volvo is having all sorts of problems getting their EX90 out and its sister the Polestar 3--both on the SPA2 platform, not SEA--(Polestar is an offshoot of Volvo, used to be its sports skunkworks).
@@JohnSmith-pn2vl
I agree. EVs have to be done from a software first approach, legacy auto-makers are terrible at developing software. Wheels, seats, motors are just peripherals required for mobility that you control from one central processing software brain. We've been through all this when it was realised that the most important part of a computer, tablet, mobile phone is the operating system ( which is the reason Microsoft, Google and Apple became so successful ), now add cars to that list. For cars the only available operating system is from Tesla, they're building a fast growing moat that is becoming impossible for anyone else to bridge, including Apple.
Nice of CNBC to interview bunch of old people who are unwilling to adapt to changes.
EV'S are not the answer, and i will not own one, thank god
EVs are part of the answer and are awesome
@@That-Guy_ bollocks
@@floridahummer
Compelling argument. I guess I will sell my EV that has saved me over $2,500 in the last 12 months and is the best car I have ever owned. 🤣
@@That-Guy_The EV premium is in the tens of thousands of dollars, especially when specialized repairs are involved. So you're technically tens of thousands of dollars in debt via opportunity cost relative to buying a used Toyota Corolla or Honda Civic and driving it until the wheels fall off.
@@gregorymalchuk272
The Model 3 ($40k) is classed as a Compact-Executive car. Other cars in that segment are Audi S4($55k) BMW M340i ($54k) Volvo S60 ($52k) Mercedes C300 ($45k) Lexus IS ($41k) Jaguar XE S ($40k) Genesis G70 ($40k) and Cadillac CT4 ($35k). So, it is actually well priced for its segment. My Model 3 has already saved me $3,800+ in fuel and maintenance over my old gas car in the 13 months I have had it.
Tesla Semi is going to reshape the future of trucking industry.
Like a plague the auto industry will unleash new environmental disasters.
EVs are still the best and only way forward.
Imagine the coal furnaces blazing in the boilers of steam-electric generating stations powering EVs. 🤗
@@gregorymalchuk272 So what? As we all know, the grid is powered by several different sources of energy.
I'll never go back to gas junk all that maintenance too costly
The biggest scam of our lives
Batteries are such a stupid way to power a car. What a waste of resources.
All the other class 8 offerings are less than 300 miles of range. Tesla does not need any "Special" experience to sell commercial trucks that are a decade ahead of their competition and improving.
are you talking class 8 commericial trucks because i have a CDL and i can tell you that is completely laughable. the EV semis dont work efficiently at all.
@@andrewdonohue1853 So do I. And if you think that the trucking companies will not adjust their operations to take advantage of a truck with 450 miles of loaded range that costs 60% less to operate? You are nuts. Pepsi in California is already proving they can run their trucks 18hours a day with only a single one hour charging session in the middle. Besides which the Tesla Semi is already being tested with the FSD Beta in house today. Tesla has their own fleet that is shuttling batteries and drive trains from Nevada to Fremont and back hauling raw resources to the Nevada plant.
@@andrewdonohue1853 Have you ever driven a Tesla Semi?
@@andrewdonohue1853 A diesel drive train less than 28% efficiency at peak performance. The rest of the energy in the fuel is lost to friction and heat dissipation. An EV drive train is around 92% efficiency. It also has the ability to recoup energy as it travels. The reason why is because every time you back off the throttle in a traditional truck, the energy is lost through mechanical back pressure. Whereas in an EV that energy is put back into the batteries. Its even to the point where Featherlite has a 53' test dry van today that has solar roof and walls, its own battery and drive train onboard. It operates off a digital strain gauge on the pin to control the trailer speed/regenerative braking.
@@davefroman4700 that's a lie. Power must be generated at a generating station which is at a location remote from the charging location. Do you understand wire resistance, the longer the wire the more the resistance and loss. The resistance and voltage generate heat, which in turn increases resistance.... wires are less efficient in hot weather.
92% is a flat out lie. If you think batteries are going to run a commercial truck efficiently you're lying to yourself. Not only do you have the electric generation and electric transportation losses, the truck would be required to haul the batteries... instead of a few hundred pounds of diesel fuel your talking thousands of pounds of batteries, i believe maybe as much as 10k lbs of batteries. That is an energy loss you will not get back.
I have a CDL and I'm typing this from. The cab of a kenworth diesel truck
Big Oil will die soon. Long live Big Lithium!
We should all thank Tesla for transitioning us to an EV world.
Wouldn't have happened without them, for sure.
Agreed!!!;)🎉🎉🎉
Why. 60% of the electricity comes from fossil fuels
You can thank the Government for changing the rules to help Tesla out.
Put solar panels on the roof come on now
I'm not driving a car that sounds like a sewing machine.!
Oh yes you will.
@@Simon-dm8zv🤡
That's OK, theyll pur in a little vroom-vroom noise machine for you, Missie.
@@Simon-dm8zvJust give him a few more years. Once the infrastructure is up and he figures out how much money he will be saving he'll be switching real fast lol
@@Luka_3D Definitely
I was a mechanic in 1982. The word was, all the 440 and 454's would not be built in just a year or two. Now in 2023, you can still buy one.
Rivian has produced 9,395 in its first quarter. Already seen the R1S in Las Vegas.
Ask Harley what happens when you cater to older buyers and stay stuck in the past
😂
so they put horses head on a carriages so it wouldn’t spook the other horses. So this analogy is,so EV makes engine noises so I wouldn’t spook the other muscle cars.
its more like people said back then to the iphone, you cannot write email it has no buttons....
I dont see any Tesla cars in the video except for trucks, that is weird . somehow most of the media hate Elon, how the hell u are talking about electric cars and not showing tesla cars in the video most of the time. Not a single company that you mentioned in the report comes even close to Tesla.
The electricity fairy is going to power them all.
I'm still puzzled with 2 things Rivian did not do - build their platform on 800V and not give more extensive & flexible power export options along the lines of what Ford did with the F-150 Lightning
Ah yes Tesla fan boy that has no clue what’s actual going on in the markets.
@@Gsuneow who are you replying to?
Just a reminder in California they plan on banning all Gasoline Cars by 2035. Considering how many people are leaving California I can't really blame them.
You think people are moving just so they can listen to engine noise?😂
@@zzappligator No, but they are trying to getaway from all the crap that is happening in California with all the crime, homeless. and drugs going on.
@@SoraFan23 That doesn't relate to ICE bans and EVs.
21:48 all of the large shopping centers with large parking lots should install solar panel canopies on their parking lots. 1. it reduces the exposure of vehicles to direct sunlight, so the cars dont become friggin ovens and as a result, use less energy to cool the car. 2. you use the land that would otherwise be doing nothing to produce energy which would help reduce energy costs. 3. the electricity from the PVs can help power charging stations for EVs.
My Dad bought an '85 Corvette which I drove anytime anywhere I wanted no questions asked. At the time it was an expensive car. It was brand new, cost 25,000 and 6,500 a year to insure it for me..a 16 yo teen. A house cost around 40,000 at that time. Wow, corvettes cost more than half of the price of buying a house. Wow...😳
Hay, don't forget that trucks have diesel filters (DPF). running cleaner than before.
There's a big need to drive Solar Panels into homes as well as bulking up the utilities.
Fleet is going to show efficiency and maintenance advantages of eVs where cost-benefit is key. I love seeing the Amazon-Rivian delivery vans out in the wild this year.
One more gain', but in English.
Wrong video titel, should be " How Tesla forced all the Auto industry to move to EVs"
😆👍
Exactly what I had in mind 🎉
Wats tittel
do Ewé meen. "Title" ¿¿¿¿
👍
2 weeks later… EVs sales slowing down.
Electric cars need to be banned trump needs to come back
EVs are awesome and old treason don needs to go to prison.
Saying a hellcat is light, handles well, and stops well is devious
I understand the objection to E.V.’s based on price, or because you rent and can’t install a level 2 charger, but otherwise, or if you have specific use cases, but I think a lot of it is because people just don’t know any better. I currently have an ‘09 Z06 Corvette with a (modified) 575 rwhp, roughly 650 at the motor, but I’m leaning toward buying an E.V. next year. I’ll just address complaints I’ve seen, some of which used to be what I also believed were problems.
Hours of charging? Yep, in my garage - I don’t have to do my weekly gas station visits.
Heavy? Yes, which means a slightly lower tire life. It also won’t be a track car like my Corvette. I’m OK with that if the replacement E.V. has the right qualities. The E.V.’s I’m looking at accelerate much faster than my Corvette, so that quality will satisfy me.
Too little range? I used to think this, but in looking back at actual long trips I’ve taken, I’m pretty sure I’ve never driven more than ~3 hours without taking a break to use the bathroom and eat. So, at a 70 mph average, that means a real 300 mile range would be fine for my worst case long distance travel.
Catching fire? The data show that when E.V.’s catch fire, it’s BAD, but the data also show that they actually catch fire about 1/50th as often as ICE cars. Yes, it’s skewed by old ICE cars, which may be the majority of those cars that catch fire. But it’s still true that E.V.’s catch fire FAR less often that ICE vehicles.
Half of the population renting is a 'specific use case'.💀
@@noseboop4354 - Absolutely true, for now., that’s why it was the 2nd objection I listed, “or because you rent”. In any case, as E.V. purchases increase I suspect employers will start increasing charging stations, so it become natural to charge during the 8’ish hours you’re at work. In California, for instance, in the 1st quarter of this year E.V.’s made up 25% of new car purchases. I’m now retired, but where I used to work in Arizona a bit over 2 years ago my employer had installed about 2 dozen chargers - but that was for around 1000 people - so a low adoption rate. I also expect that even rentals will start getting chargers, whether it’s an apartment complex or houses.
I travel for work. There's no way I'd purchase an EV. I'm not going to be sitting at a charging station for 40 minutes or better. They aren't feasible for me at all.
@@billbillerton6122 - If you drive for more than 3 to 4 hours at a time without taking a break to eat or go to the bathroom, an E.V. clearly won’t work for you. It also depends on where you live, because many rural locations have poor charging infrastructure. On the other hand, more and more charging stations are being installed at hotel, specifically for travelers like you. Here’s an example from an article I read about Hilton Hotels:
Hilton to Add 20,000 Tesla Chargers to Its Hotels Across North America
The hotel company has teamed up with Tesla to add 20,000 Universal Wall Connectors at 2,000 Hilton hotel properties throughout the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.
You're silly Z06 will be quite the boat anchor when everyone's trying to charge their EVs all at once, The grid is already maxed out stupid..you're all done driving punk😢
I'm a car guy. But all my performance cars I've had is nothing, nothing to my Model Y. Which can haul my big family's needs too.
The story should say " How car makers are being forced to switch to EV's. Hopefully the next president with put a stop to all this.
Google Toyota. E V market has died on the vine.😂😂😂.
No mention that if Tesla or anyone else makes autonomous vehicles soon EVERYTHING will change.
FSD v12 being "nothing but net" is the path to autonomy. It's just a matter of time now. Nobody other than Tesla has the data to solve autonomy.
@@machoopichoo2 I haven't used V12 but the previous versions of FSD totally sucked.
@@OtisFlint V12 is alpha still (i.e., not available to the public). Apparently the move from heuristics & partial net to a pure neutral net, has been transformative. Many quite like v11.+ but it's unfortunate you had bad experiences. I believe FSD will hit a tipping point (soon), like most AI, all of a sudden go from good or even poor, to outstanding, then very soon after, superhuman. That's exponentiality for ya. ;^)
I've seen some of the Frito Lay Tesla trucks on the road already. I love that cool paint job.
The "OEM's" will be a hurdle for ICE manufactures that they may not overcome along with all the debt they carry. So I think this is a prime opportunity for more start ups like TESLA ect...to become the new BIG 3 or more....the old big 3 have reached their life expectancy.
Yep, the vast majority of legacy automakers will go bankrupt, as accelerated by the UAW. Startups like Rivian are on shaky ground, unfortunately. Lucid is a pump and dump. Even Tesla almost went out of business. Like it or not, the future of the auto industry is 90% Tesla and Chinese cars.
CNBC....Wall Street's principal advertising agent for Capitalism! Hell, they broadcast from the floor of the NYSE...how objective could they be?
CNBC appeals to mostly older people and they HATE TESLA!! Most older people (I am 56) will stay either stubborn or uninformed until they either die or unwillingly switch because the average Tesla will be much cheaper and the financial benefits will almost always “win-out”.
NOt about age. I know people in their 20s that hate TEsla because some people just don't like Tesla. Doesn't mean they don't like other BEVS. Tesla isn't the only BEV to consider.
Why would the type of motor be an issue. Most people want to get there. The most significant auto development for boomers is autonomy. When my mother could no longer drive she lost her independence. She died less the 2 years after. Hope and purpose are crucial to life. Autonomy will deliver this long after the elderly lose the ability to drive. That's MILLIONS of people with improved quality if life. I don't think that can be ignored.
Tesla is awesome, nothing comes close..
Yet another Tesla hit piece.
😂 didn’t age well. EV’s are terrible they can’t give them away the lie is over.
"The muscle car is NOT supposed to look like a melted jelly bean..." 👍
EVs shouldnt have been left out of politics. 2 and a half decades in the car industry and am a fully certified senior master for Ford. I fully trust the evs, have worked on high voltage batteries etc. They are good but ask the public and you would think they bought one and it broke.
I dont understand why dodge just doesnt just put their inline 6 twin turbo into the charger & challenger as well as offer something new with an SRT 4 engine (turbo 4 banger but more power maybe 300hp). they used to offer the Neon SRT 4 back in the day
What for?
Tesla destroyed the misconception that electric cars are slow.
To talk about EVs without including Chinese automakers is a joke !!! CNBC you threw a good one.
But that would have cut into CNBC's 7 minute Dodge fossil fuel muscle car commercial at the beginning of the video.
Yup. The moment obvious Chinese EV manufacturers start selling stateside …. Tesla and other US EV makers better up their game.
I said ‘obvious’ china manufacturers because Volvo EVs are Chinese owned.
Tesla equates to a cool EV system mated to an overall crappy car for $50,000 plus...give me a Toyota Hybrid any day of the week
You can absolutely continue to drive gas and diesel muscle cars as long as there is still gas and diesel to fuel them which should be for a quite a long time, certainly many decades. The transition means new ones won't be built, but classics can still be driven.
OPEC plus loves how unamerican you are
EV is future.But Not today,
Drive a ticking time bomb and burn your house down for only $60k.
To your claim that electric trucks are much heavier than diesels.. proove it!
According to Tesla the weight penalty is less than 1 ton… and steadily improving
The Lightning weighs 6,500 pounds-more than 35 percent more than the gas / Diesel trucks .
Amazing power Rimac Nevera & Tesla Model S, Plaid. Those are hyper power cars!!
I can appreciate Toyota for realizing that EV's are not the future and they are focused more on Hybrids and alternative fuel sources for ICE vehicles.