Field due to infinite plane of charge (Gauss law application) | Physics | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 89

  • @ingolfura.4327
    @ingolfura.4327 3 роки тому +132

    I'm not from India, but from northern Europe. And I must say your videos are absolutely fantastic. Your explanations are so clear and thought out, and the production quality is off the charts mate. Teaching is truly your calling, and I hope that you will Keep on producing as much as you're able. Kudos.Great!

  • @araujo4015
    @araujo4015 2 роки тому +30

    Im from Brazil and i must say, i was struggling to learn this but your explanation was so clear... this is by far the best video i found, you should be proud of your skills

  • @srikrishnarr6553
    @srikrishnarr6553 7 місяців тому +5

    North or South , East or West two things are common which are doubts in physics and appreciating the teacher who came with an apt presentation and explanation to clear the doubts....marvellous video

  • @justlearn3444
    @justlearn3444 3 роки тому +27

    i agree alakh sir teaches awesome but, i have forgotten his contents many times, but sir watched your videos, my mind forgot to forget :), concepts get more closer to heart , thank you sir

    • @YenaShah
      @YenaShah 3 роки тому +1

      Same!

    • @projjalm
      @projjalm 3 роки тому +9

      I don't like Alakh sir lol... he's creepy.

    • @bluehourcore
      @bluehourcore 3 роки тому +7

      plus alakh sir's videos are rlly long, these are short and concise but both of teach really well

    • @Nancy_Shorts13
      @Nancy_Shorts13 2 місяці тому

      Alakh sir videos are great ..and takes patience to understand . But here the videos are visually explained , so you can feel the physics into depth .

  • @headhunter7824
    @headhunter7824 3 роки тому +7

    sir I'm not from India, some of my Indian friends (from delhi) have suggested your channel ,I'm thankful for what u explained , I wasted lot of money in online courses, now I'm gaining knowledge by your channel

  • @s1mpelness771
    @s1mpelness771 4 місяці тому +2

    I think your the best teacher out there, you went through every detail that my lecturer didint make clear , I watched alot of other videos , but none of them as clear as urs , thanks man

  • @carterschuller1583
    @carterschuller1583 6 місяців тому +4

    as an American physics student, it's a beautiful video!

    • @dropperhoonmein
      @dropperhoonmein 4 місяці тому +2

      hey, I always wanted to know is the level of maths and physics taught in American High schools and Indian High schools same ?

    • @carterschuller1583
      @carterschuller1583 4 місяці тому +1

      @@dropperhoonmein good question thanks for asking :) I’m not very familiar with the Indian high school system but in most cases I would say no, I think most Indian high-school goes further. That said subjects like integration and differentiation which seem to be commonly taught in Indian high schools. Are only seen in American high-school if you take optional “AP” or “IB” classes. So in mostly cases likely Indian students go more in-depth yet you’ll certainly have quite a few American students that are matching if not ahead of those Indian students. All that said, I’m not completely sure! Let me know what your experience was like if you went to school in India.

    • @dropperhoonmein
      @dropperhoonmein 4 місяці тому +1

      @@carterschuller1583 First of all thanks for the reply, I completed my high school in 2023 and took a drop year for my prep for competitive exams for college and as you said here high school calculus is very tough and the level of calculus, geometry and algebra in competitive exams ( like JEE ) is way beyond tough, but the worst part is even after going though this tough syllabus and these highly competitive exams I dono why our country has high unemployable graduates.

    • @Nancy_Shorts13
      @Nancy_Shorts13 2 місяці тому

      ​@@dropperhoonmeinwhy your name is dropper😂😂

    • @dropperhoonmein
      @dropperhoonmein 2 місяці тому

      ​@@Nancy_Shorts13 cuz I took a year drop for JEE
      (I used this account as a study account during my drop year so that I won't be distracted with other stuff while studying)

  • @Fighter_goal
    @Fighter_goal 8 місяців тому +2

    Hello from Bangladesh ❤

  • @tonysingh4178
    @tonysingh4178 3 роки тому +11

    You give expanation to every single argument that comes into my mind . Whenever i watch your videos i feel so so happy . Thankyou so much for making such wonderful videos and for making our concepts crystal clear. Whenever i am confused in some topic i just type the topic and then khan academy . THANK YOU SIR 😌

  • @camzanabasnet2354
    @camzanabasnet2354 2 роки тому +2

    ......our teacher suggest to watch this video.... And I was surprised why he did so... But now after watching it I come to know.... U r simply amazing and so do your teaching style... ❤❤❤❤lots of love

  • @harjinderkaur6066
    @harjinderkaur6066 3 роки тому +6

    After going through several videos finally found what I was looking for,simply amazing 👏
    Thank apot sir!

  • @nikhildhania5021
    @nikhildhania5021 4 роки тому +4

    You are AMAZING SIR....
    Student from Haryana......

  • @zaibullah5221
    @zaibullah5221 3 роки тому +5

    Sir salam cordially to your concept about physics..

  • @Unidentifying
    @Unidentifying Рік тому +2

    extremely well explained, WOW . Its good that the pace is a bit slow for such important concepts

  • @pinkydevi8323
    @pinkydevi8323 3 роки тому +3

    Just to the point and easy explanation... Much appreciated 👍

  • @m.karimulla1803
    @m.karimulla1803 4 роки тому +3

    Sir your English is awesome to understand every person

  • @kristinely8929
    @kristinely8929 3 роки тому +3

    you are simply amazing

  • @Nancy_Shorts13
    @Nancy_Shorts13 2 місяці тому +1

    Wonderous Video❤️

  • @yash1152
    @yash1152 2 роки тому +2

    1:48 - selection criterion for surface
    2:11 - 3 spl cases

  • @nandana8287
    @nandana8287 2 роки тому +5

    I'm soo grateful that I found this channel :) .Your explanations are superb . All my doubts would be cleared at the end of the video.

  • @manavrawal8918
    @manavrawal8918 2 роки тому +2

    Great Explanation, Fantastic teacher!!

  • @nafinmahmoud9010
    @nafinmahmoud9010 3 роки тому +1

    this kind of video makes me feel to drop uni and get a degree-level knowledge on my own from utube videos

  • @sannivasadhukhan6741
    @sannivasadhukhan6741 Рік тому +1

    Thanks a lot Sir. Please keep producing such videos.

  • @tamiltamilan2208
    @tamiltamilan2208 4 роки тому +4

    Hello sir please make an NEET exam crash course because the exam is approaching and please make a crash course and give a handful of tricks and tips and hints to Solve the physics questions also to crack NEET exam so please so please give a handful of tricks tips and hints the Solve the physics questions of NEET exam

  • @bobosanakhumanthem5063
    @bobosanakhumanthem5063 3 роки тому +1

    clearly understood sir... thanks to you sir

  • @yash1152
    @yash1152 2 роки тому

    thanks a lot for being in ur true accent - this helped me to stay focussed and didnt distract me.
    (context: the copied/forced accent in other/older videos was very distracting for me)

  • @thiyaneshs144
    @thiyaneshs144 3 місяці тому

    thank you so much to make me understand for choosing a cylinder

  • @amribnaas
    @amribnaas 6 місяців тому

    thanks khan academy

  • @lariosphotography4721
    @lariosphotography4721 Рік тому

    I've been trying to look for a rigorous vector calculation. Using Gauss's law is contingent on the fact that you already *know* the direction of the field lines due to the infinite plane of uniform charge density. Using E = k integral(dq/r^2)r^, I want to *show* that the unit vector (r^) ends up in the positive z direction (assuming the plane lies along the x-y plane) for points above the plane, and in the negative z direction for points below the plane.

  • @physicsperadox7849
    @physicsperadox7849 2 роки тому

    That explanation is pretty dope .. but it's Lil bit complicated insted of doing this ... You can imagine it as a rod and try to calculate it it'll be much easier

  • @flestenbawaqnah3742
    @flestenbawaqnah3742 2 роки тому +1

    Fantastic😍

  • @nomann5244
    @nomann5244 10 місяців тому +1

    but what is the proof that in this case we can use gauss law. is there any mathematical proof or just memorization?

  • @stepheno7333
    @stepheno7333 10 місяців тому

    somone give that man some top he deserve it

  • @yoshikiwong9118
    @yoshikiwong9118 Місяць тому

    I tried on my own and I use cube instead and got the same answer!

  • @niranjan7457
    @niranjan7457 3 роки тому +3

    @ 7:10
    SIR, CAN WE USE A RECTANGULAR CUBOID, AS IT TOO IS FLAT, AND CAN ENCLOSE THE ENTIRE SHEET? IN OUR TEXTBOOKS IT's GIVEN LIKE THAT

    • @abdomenebadellah
      @abdomenebadellah 3 роки тому

      Good question

    • @tonysingh4178
      @tonysingh4178 3 роки тому +1

      Yes we can , there will be six surfaces and on two surfaces only the angle between ds and e will not be 90 degree but zero . So yes we can use.

  • @gnikkings
    @gnikkings 2 роки тому

    Very counter intuitive that the distance doesn't matter.

  • @m.karimulla1803
    @m.karimulla1803 4 роки тому +1

    I am the first viewer of your video 7:28pm

  • @nicolateslawithcokacola8155

    Sir you are great 😃

  • @yashkevinsingh1975
    @yashkevinsingh1975 3 роки тому

    Loved this

  • @nish4113
    @nish4113 4 роки тому

    Very best sir

  • @manojmaheshwari4055
    @manojmaheshwari4055 4 роки тому +6

    Sir why can't you add the related videos (infinite charged wire and sphere)in the description.

  • @justlearn3444
    @justlearn3444 3 роки тому

    simply beautiful

  • @MaryashrafBaly
    @MaryashrafBaly 3 роки тому

    Wow! ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @brighttips8203
    @brighttips8203 2 роки тому

    thnks sir

  • @m.karimulla1803
    @m.karimulla1803 4 роки тому

    Sir make gaseous state lectures

  • @Jerk741
    @Jerk741 2 роки тому

    If it is infinite cube, maybe in 4th dimension it would be directly proportional to the r.

  • @InvincibleEdits2005
    @InvincibleEdits2005 2 роки тому

    Mind blowing 💀

  • @benjaminkhoo7257
    @benjaminkhoo7257 6 місяців тому

    May be a silly question but I still don't fully understand why it's 2EA, aren't the two Es acting in opposite directions?

    • @Nancy_Shorts13
      @Nancy_Shorts13 2 місяці тому

      Electric field doesn't cancel out on being opposite . It's not force , it's the intensity of force acting on unit charge

  • @GodSahil
    @GodSahil 5 місяців тому +1

    we can't we take a cube as gaussian surface?

    • @Nancy_Shorts13
      @Nancy_Shorts13 2 місяці тому

      It would be the same result as taking cylinder . The area on the left side of Gauss eqn will cancel out the area on right side of the eqn

  • @radhekrishna6245
    @radhekrishna6245 3 роки тому

    Please come in front of us in the end and starting of video

  • @omegagamer4383
    @omegagamer4383 3 роки тому +1

    Sir why the area always show outward direction???

    • @oceaness1583
      @oceaness1583 3 роки тому

      To calculate flux through a surface, we have to take into account the outward normal to the surface and the angle it makes with the direction of electric field ( or electric field lines). This helps us understand the quantity of field lines passing through the surface or if any passes through it at all. (If you have studies about electric flux, you must know that area is considered a vector quantity here)

  • @arshsharma8627
    @arshsharma8627 3 роки тому +1

    I am afraid...any number, howsoever big is alwar closer to zero than to infinity....

  • @m.karimulla1803
    @m.karimulla1803 4 роки тому +1

    Sir do all the lectures with your language only sir

  • @kidschannel6614
    @kidschannel6614 2 роки тому

    Why didn't we used a rectangle why only cylinder. I mean rectangle also have flat ends?

  • @manojmaheshwari4055
    @manojmaheshwari4055 4 роки тому +1

    Sir,why can't we choose ah cuboid which has flat surface at the both side of the plate and passes through the sheet.

    • @DushyanthEdadasula
      @DushyanthEdadasula 3 роки тому +1

      One can choose any shape. The answer remains the same because the flux doesn't pass through the walls.

    • @manojmaheshwari4055
      @manojmaheshwari4055 3 роки тому

      @@DushyanthEdadasula but while choosing cylinder during integration of da we put A ( which is the area of flat surface of cylinder on both sides i.e: circle ) but when we choose cuboid the area of flat surfaces become the area of square ... Please clear me anyone

    • @DushyanthEdadasula
      @DushyanthEdadasula 3 роки тому

      @@manojmaheshwari4055 you're on the right track.

    • @DushyanthEdadasula
      @DushyanthEdadasula 3 роки тому

      In fact you can choose a tube with any kind of cross section. The 'A' on both sides will cancel anyway, leaving you with the same answer.

    • @manojmaheshwari4055
      @manojmaheshwari4055 3 роки тому +1

      @@DushyanthEdadasula ya ur right bro ... Tq bro 🙏🏻

  • @PrabhjotSingh_24
    @PrabhjotSingh_24 3 роки тому

    sir can we use a cuboid instead of a cylinder and put it the same was as the cylinder

    • @walterblack91
      @walterblack91 2 роки тому +1

      yes....any shape, it doesn't matter because in the end area cancels outs

  • @jasirirshad5133
    @jasirirshad5133 Рік тому

    Can someone clear this doubt of mine that if we're talking about charge enclosed by the gaussian surface why dont we take it as (2×sigma×a) as we've two sides of sheet ?

    • @AbhiramGSrivathsa
      @AbhiramGSrivathsa Рік тому

      It's a thin sheet so the charges reside on the plane

    • @avishasrivastavaxi-e7255
      @avishasrivastavaxi-e7255 9 місяців тому

      @@AbhiramGSrivathsaso charges reside on one side only?

    • @AbhiramGSrivathsa
      @AbhiramGSrivathsa 9 місяців тому

      @@avishasrivastavaxi-e7255 the charges are embedded in the thin sheet. it's very thin so one single charge is visible on both the sides of the sheet

  • @raghavsrivastava2910
    @raghavsrivastava2910 3 роки тому

    Sir why not use a cube?

  • @karunyareddy1458
    @karunyareddy1458 2 роки тому

    Sir is this sheet a conductor or insulator?

    • @Nancy_Shorts13
      @Nancy_Shorts13 2 місяці тому

      Doesn't matter as long as the charge is static

  • @rajivdas2133
    @rajivdas2133 Рік тому

    R40difgi

  • @khanzada7257
    @khanzada7257 2 роки тому +1

    Ziyada darama na kia ker, jaldi jaldi explain kia kary, 2 mint k topic ko 20 mint my explean karty ho

    • @manavrawal8918
      @manavrawal8918 2 роки тому +3

      Agar tujhe itni charbi hai to khud hi padh ke samaj le na.

    • @Nancy_Shorts13
      @Nancy_Shorts13 2 місяці тому

      Nonesense ... Very rude and eligt student