Lec 2 | MIT 9.00SC Introduction to Psychology, Spring 2011
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 тра 2024
- Lecture 2: Science and Research
Instructor: John Gabrieli
View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/9-00SCS11
License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
More courses at ocw.mit.edu
I am sitting under a tree in a village in India and studding psychology, taught by a professor teaching in MIT. Thank you internet.
Thank JIO
@@himanshupratapsingh1603 he pays for jio, he should thank mit
Haha ... what an awesome comment!
I feel you, man :) Greetings from a small town in Ukraine!
Next Newton on the way fellas!!
I love his quirky demeanors.
Yes, like his ahah aha aha laugh
Me too
Yes my favorite
They make him really intresting right?
Добрый
maybe its me but he comes off as really love Psychology. Best kind of people to learn from.
My old psych teacher was like this. Coming vack 10 years to relearn and it's refreshing to see someone talk about this subject so ecstatically
This guy loves what he does
Until he's the patient being worsen
this is an amazing time we live in. Knowledge is free and available for the taking. all we have to do is stop and pick it up.
These lectures have been so helpful to me as a teenager hoping to become a psychologist like my parents one day! Thank you Professor Gabrieli!
Hey kind advice from a student who is actually nobody from nowhere
If you really want to become a psychologist then ask a lot of questions from your parents
A lot means a lot
Because Being a student from a nobody's family I know how great it is to have your parents as your teachers
My parents didn’t let me do wathc these things as a teenager bc they’re witch craft!
I love this class. God bless the internet and MIT. Beautiful, thnks professor G!
@wise guy its the name of the college who does the video
im so entranced by his lectures - they’re so thought-inducing, u can rlly tell that he does what he does because he loves it. so glad to have this series act as an eye-opener to the basics of psychology as an aspiring psychologist!
I can listen to him telling all kinds of psychology stories forever, so contagiously happy and passionate! Thanks MIT! Thanks Professor John Gabrieli!
I’m 13, and listening to this professor made me want to study psychology when I’m older.
Nugget great, always keep an open mind and think critically!
Study it, and more!
If you can listen to all of his classes and still love it, you are definitely made to study it.
@Jason Hardin why not?
@@dohnjoe5401 you can study for the love of the subject. not everything you learn has to be for a future job
I am studying Phycology from Kenya and I think this professor is awesome! He makes it so understable. Thanks MIT.
52:55 you can tell by his laugh that he genuinely enjoys talking about what he teaches. Being confident in what you teach, and engaging enough to elicit a laugh from your students when you slip a joke in shows a lot about how good of a professor he is!
really
i like this professor. Those stats are wonderfully interesting
this is the most interesting psychology lecture ive ever listened to. so good.
I love how relaxed Gabrieli is, and seems like a friendly guy. Paul Bloom knows his shit and has a few funny moments, but he doesn’t seem as approachable as Gabrieli.
love MIT and sometimes I wonder ..what. wonderful thing internet is ....blessed !!
+
This is a prerequisite to understanding the human brain course taught by Nancy Kanwisher and I'm enjoying him enormously. He's a terrific teacher. I worked in Neuroscience research for almost 20 years and the stuff we knew then is so primitive now.
I'm taking this course this summer, so happy i could have an idea what this course is going to be about thx MIT
I’m literally 13 and in love with these lectures this man is so amazing at his job and you can tell he wants to be there teaching 🐸
He is a good professor. He is good at his job, he cares and it shows he wants you to truly learn.
He is honestly the most likeable teacher i have ever seen
Thank you for sharing this. I really love psychology and I think to enrol soon.
This man loves what he does makes me want to study psychology more and more
The bright rat or dull rat explains a lot and gave me insight on a personal issue thank you so much
Thank you for the free class!
Terimakasih banyak. Saya di Klirong, Kebumen, Indonesia bisa menonton dan belajar banyak sekali dari seorang MIT professor
I agree with you fully. It is the same thing with using I.Q tests as an accurate measure of intelligence. Factors such as mood, concentration, energy levels etc., play a role in how well you do on the test. If such an experiment were carried out, we would have to keep these factors in mind and take the results with a grain of salt. However, such an experiment would give us an insight into the learning process of the student and help further research into helping students learn better.
Also IQ only measures a very limited aspect of intelligence. Theres other things way more powerful and meaningful such as emotional control, social awareness, grit, the ability to recognize the intentions of others and see past outward rhetoric
And when it comes to mastery of a field of study, nothing compares to passion and persistent focus
@@skybirdnomad hey there! I wrote that comment 10 years ago and wow, so much has changed. I've finished grad school and am now in a career related to psychology and philosophy. Funny how that works haha.
I think IQ is entirely a sham and it is frontloaded with a bunch of classist stuff.
I just read Freakanomics. It was a very good book, I do reccomend it and it was awesome seeing it referenced in this video
thank you so much for this course. im loving it. Can anyone tell me what the textbook is for this class?
So grateful for these MIT open courses, thank you! On a side note, we should stop judging and giving responsibility to people (including ourselves). If a crime or a misdeed is committed, a society should act to protect its citizens by limiting the perpetrator ability to do it again (through jail, hospitals, therapy etc..). To judge is in our human nature, yet I think we would better put that off
I can’t thank you enough for this upload❤️✌🏼
Im highly considering going back to college for psychology. I am curious, if anyone can answer this, are these videos in order(as in is the second video literally from the second day of class) ? Just trying to get a head start before actually returning to college(possibly trying to to use clep to test out of intro to psych at odu if I can).
Yes...
I'm always looking for new interesting lectures on Psychology/Philosophy, please let me know if you guys have any recommendations, would be highly appreciated
Loved the last part of the lecture! So true!!!
At 16:19 there is an error. it says John B. Watson lived from 1978 - 1958. Should it be 1978?
with the practical issues which are discussed in this lecture with the current research methods, how good are the results of the psychology researches?
how are they considered reliable?
Glad to come acrossed with these in my algorithm.
I love this Proffesor he's so charismatic and he has a funny laugh!
Thank you so much, your input has been invaluable, in my personal views.
thank you for this great resource!
Bravo, Dr. Gabrieli -
I enjoyed the lecture very much :)
- Milner Benedict III
Thank you professor and MIT, amazing course
The linear algebra professor ought to erase the board at the end of the lecture.
He's a dick for not erasing the board.
sa'ad ibn Asaad Husain omg that was annoying me too
I EXPECTED THINGS LIKE THIS DON'T HAPPEN AT MIT AND HARVARD???
wise guy Look at the math on the blackboard. That’s linear algebra :)
wise guy That’s not the point. The previous class was linear algebra and the professor from linear algebra neglected to erase the board.
I don't think these people are very friendly but I still love them.
Dude this guy is the man!!
¿How is it used the vectorial product in psychology?
do you have any books related with this class? or you can recommend some books to help me learn psychology.
A decent read on psychology for early learning is "The Road Less Traveled" by Scott M Peck, I believe it's a series with 3 books.
Great lecture, thank you John.
This professor is beyond amazing. I'd love to hang out with him fr haha
Penswordking You are right, this result suggest that both effects work to some degree. Men are more likely to say "yes" in general, but when the women are rotating, the two effects cancel each other out.
bro i wake up and look at my history to see part 1 and 2 fully watched through the night
Maybe, in the speed dating example, the stationary position primes the desk bound partners to see themselves as judges, or managers; and the rotating position primes people to see themselves as applicants/contestants/ defendants?
Could that be why the rotating partners ate more likely to say yes than the stationary ones?
Hey that's an interesting perspective!!
Interesting and fun lecture. Thanks to the organizations, the team, and the professor!
wow...thank you so much...forever
His laughter is like Ross from friends.
Excellent. Thank you, MIT and Professor Gabrieli.
It would be interesting to conduct an experiment that tests the overall quality (in terms of a rating) of the same lecture viewed online versus the lecture experienced physically - i.e. a classroom experience. In which situation are people more likely to 'learn' and, therefore, rate the lecture accordingly?
seems interesting
Thank you Internet.
thank you very much and very interesting final point. i wondered about the speed dating statistics. To me the graphs imply that the person at the desk is more selective but still that men are less selective then women. as the rotating women are still less selective then the rotating men. Even if sitting at the desk makes you more selective.
I understand Environmental effects and how some people grow with the mental pressures they believe is the truth. Even adults from my experiences are still unable to choose ethically to help solve or conclude correctly in many cases.
I really love psychology and I think to enrol soon
I really liked his way of talking and smile too :)
Fantastic lecture.
cool i love psychology
Great professor 👨🏫
The example of littering is probably related to people conforming to the perceived norms of acceptable behaviour.
Great so far
Here is myy opinion on gravity!
This Lecture is even good For Personality development
So if people can act “weird” during experiments and a lot of the subjects come from a specific pool of people, How many Psychological discoveries are we missing out on?
I cant help seeing the linear algebra scribbled in the background
what an intelligent man !
Very easy to answer, the online version is better, you can rewind, watch the difficult parts over and over,google stuff,etc.
Some chill Linear Algebra in the back
(cont) On the other hand, if you feel that it's just part of your studies and you have to be there you might not be as interested. Plus, since this is MIT, I suspect many have other majors and might just have needed a course to fill some quota and in fact aren't as interested as people who actively sought the lectures out online. In short, I think there are so many factors at play that the effect of the experience of sitting in a classroom is negligible. I could be wrong of course.
as an aeronautical engineering student sometimes i think how I can consubstantiate this major with that :) any idea????
Psychology could be helpful in the human relationship aspect but in your case especifically I'd say consumer behavior psychology or some from of statistic analysis focused psychology, which could help predict tendencies in buyer and human interest enabling you, as an engineer, to potentially innovate through products or solve issues related to your field either in the beginning of its appearance on the market or even before it becomes apparent. Classes in Economics or Marketing could also teach that, with less focus on the people side.
Learned a lot
He told them students are more stressed and less empathetic before they filled out their questionnaire. How will that affect their answers?
who else fell asleep on YT and woke up to this video XD
no one.. just me, yeah thought so
i wish my professors were like that :)
Thank you very much sir...
Why is there linear algebra in the bacground?
Typo at 16:25. John Watson was born in 1878 not 1978.
In relation to the warmth promoting interpersonal warmth study, more recent studies suggest that the original study does not replicate. Ex: Lynott et al. 2014.
This professor is fabulous. I would have married him in a heartbeat.
HotDogLA this is so creepy and wrong
Clearly you didn’t listen to lecture,
@@user-qi6fj4gy1j yes u didn't I would have also married him in a heartbeat 🤪
Intelligence is INSANELY attractive at least to me, so I completely get where you’re coming from.
She's talking about 20:10.
In relation to the money study, more recent studies suggest that the original study does not replicate. Ex: Rohrer, Pahsler and Harris. 2019.
HAHAHAH... I couldn't fall asleep at all in this interesting lecture from the beginning till the end with those funny experiments and statistic analysis. For the issue of brain injury, how come I still can't remember the missing page of my crucial memory in my life book at all when I got brain injury-ABT by neurological explanation. This is still a myth for me to search............ STF
Thanks!
A movie version of this lecture would be played by Jeff Goldblum
Perhaps I'm not getting something but why is he saying that the evolutionary explanation is eliminated in the date selection experiment? Based on those graphs it seems to me that it went from being very asymmetrical to being about the same, which still means that there is an effect that males are less selective. If it was entirely due to who gets up and who stays put then we would expect the reversal of the trend not the disappearance of it. This just shows there are more factors at play.
Yes now (2023) we know social media is bad specially for teenagers
“Well he did X how come I can’t do X”
“Well he did X and got a slap in the wrist / got away with it, I bet I can too”
“Well he did X and got caught, but he doesn’t know what I do so I’ll get away with it”
“Well he did X perfectly and still got caught - but he doesn’t have my luck”
^ 31:32 here’s what I think goes through the mind of a person who sees X criminal / illegal / immoral / unethical activity and performs the activity. I believe someone who was already going to do X is more likely to do it and that those people are members of society therefor I agree that X happens, you’ll see more X occur.
Now, what’s implied is: “if YOU see X, YOURE likely to replicate it”
That I cannot agree with. If it is adjusted to: “if you see X, you are more likely to do another version of X” I can see how that would work. I might not murder someone after seeing a murder, but I might give ‘em the cold shoulder - for me, acting as though you’re dead is the equivalent of killing you….
Psychology is fun 😊🎉
I like this guy!!!
When he said "and I'm a late marrier..", I lost it xD
So if I somehow understand this lecture, there is little certainty in our classifications and assumptions, and most importantly, our typical studies based of samples are contaminated with flaws and bias and hence suffer from desired expectations design. As if all the above weren’t enough to question every study finding and methodical presumptions such as evolutionary psychology, we must also select a representative sample for the population under investigation. Is there such a thing such as a representative sample? Of course inferential statistics says yes purely based on mathematical models and computations of degree of confidence and probability, but those models in their very essence disregard the distracting details and only make sense in the most abstract fashion. Summing up all the obstacles facing psychological studies, we must account for the accumulative effect of all possible errors compromising the final findings. The best way to be sure is to be unsure, or so was said.
I am glad this is the same dude in the previous video I watched. I like this dude. Kinda annoying how he makes jokes and laughs to himself. Still he captivates myself, and makes it interesting
Yes he really does need to control those outbursts of mild hysteria. If he just kept his voice at a lower register whilst doing it that would be an improvement. Not a difficult problem to overcome.
Who cares.
Now my perceptions all wake up back from Lecture 6 to this Lecture 2 for audit this class. Not again. what is going on most of the student in MIT with no responds and answers at all toward this cool Prof.'s question? Kind a disappointed for the student sitting in such top-notch lecture in the world....What a shame and waste!!.......... STF...................
What the hell is the grammar of this comment?
@@harleywright3332 still trying to figure it out
Thanks
“The broken window theory” may sound like a metaphors, but represents a super bug reality, which is a direct consequence of poverty and ruthless capitalism. There are people who are naturally more equipped to face the challenges and demands of life than others. Nevertheless, there are those who fall behind and in need of public economic planning and welfare. We are not exaggerating if we say that poverty is behind crimes, disease, mental illnesses, teenage delinquency, suicide and illiteracy. On the other hand, ruthless capitalism is behind political tension, corruption, war, pollution, economic collapse and failed response to pandemics.
Who was the guy who said gravity was a scientific consensus? Anyone know the ref?
Well, an apple is always gonna fall if you drop it,
Can someone at MIT can link all the videos of this course ? This professor is great !
Full course playlist: ua-cam.com/play/PL44ABC9278E2EE706.html. Course materials: ocw.mit.edu/9-00SCS11. Best wishes on your studies!
@@mitocw thank you.
Wow. How sad that the first video has over 260k views and 1.8k likes, but the second one has less than a third. So many undedicated people in this world.
I don't think he was saying that it is causal, just observing the data that he has been given and making an uneducated guess...I agree that there is more variables involved with coming to the conclusion mentioned, but it does not necessarily make it a wrong one, just one with little evidence to support it.
***** Try harder edgelord.
Many people test something out and decide they dont like it. Does not mean they are undedicated.
r/iamverysmart
Alexa, play Despacito