The Singapore Warship | How Strong is it?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @BehindAsia
    @BehindAsia  Рік тому +22

    Just how strong do you think Singapore's Warships are? Let us know down below!

    • @royston0125
      @royston0125 Рік тому +4

      would like to see links to sources (not doubting just enjoy looking throught them

    • @katprowler6805
      @katprowler6805 Рік тому +1

      I agree. It's a paper tiger. Look at Israel... they are far stronger than Singapore but having a hard time even fighting Hezbollah and thats even with a blank check given from the US.
      SG has advanced weaponry but it will run out of missiles and bombs very quickly.

    • @teckkeeang4363
      @teckkeeang4363 Рік тому +11

      @@katprowler6805mind to share which country are you from? Have you ever serve in the forces? Do you know what is Singapore defence strategy?

    • @obiwan6010
      @obiwan6010 Рік тому +12

      ⁠@@katprowler6805Would it be really fair to say that the IDF is having a hard time fighting Hezbollah when the conflict between these 2 entities is only limited to the exchange of sporadic missiles and gunfire along the border thus far?

    • @fkh3100
      @fkh3100 Рік тому +8

      @@katprowler6805 Singapore is the Israel's student.
      Yes, Israel is more powerful than Singapore. And we are grateful to Israel that we are one of top 30 military powers.
      If Israel want frigates, we will help designing frigates for them

  • @tommytstang
    @tommytstang Рік тому +54

    I had served in the RSN for 11 years as a Marine Engineering Specialist/ Even in my days, the RSN was formidable with the older equipment and has often held our own against Malaysia, New Zealand, Australia and Britain during the annual nations naval exercises. This documentary also forget to mention that the RSN Submarine squadron and the Maritime air petrol aircrafts

    • @Vebjorn_wotBlitz2507
      @Vebjorn_wotBlitz2507 11 місяців тому +3

      Respect

    • @ujisusanto8599
      @ujisusanto8599 11 місяців тому

      Pesawat tempur di atas gedung x ya

    • @dna6882
      @dna6882 5 місяців тому +1

      The nz navy, to my great shame is a Meer shadow of its former self....

  • @dakapil8398
    @dakapil8398 Рік тому +60

    As a Singaporean, I am more proud we are living harmoniously with our neighbours than i am proud we have a formidable navy

    • @tanjoseph8922
      @tanjoseph8922 11 місяців тому +6

      Well said. Proud that we are living in relative harmony in this region ❤

    • @Cloud7050
      @Cloud7050 11 місяців тому +2

      Even if there are tough aspects like cost of living, one thing I'll continue to be thankful for is the low rates of crime.

    • @forcexjr1566
      @forcexjr1566 11 місяців тому +2

      We are extremely lucky that ASEAN generally has a common consensus that living in peace and tolerating one another is the way to go, unlike the Middle East.

    • @mustaffabinhassan8225
      @mustaffabinhassan8225 11 місяців тому

      Before Aug 7, we regarded the Israel military as the BEST but they disappointed us.

    • @simroysten7963
      @simroysten7963 10 місяців тому

      @@mustaffabinhassan8225 Most of their ammunition sent to Ukr and US Congress under Trump's control refused to resupply them.

  • @___Danny___
    @___Danny___ Рік тому +28

    we may not be the biggest or heaviest tonnages navy in this region but we are able to make sure every assets we had is operational.

    • @gigaslave
      @gigaslave 11 місяців тому

      Our Mindef budget is in fact spent carefully, so yes, the guns all work.

  • @Cloud7050
    @Cloud7050 11 місяців тому +12

    I feel like we may be able to deal with small threats effectively, but can get easily outnumbered in a true conflict.

  • @eatdriveplay
    @eatdriveplay Рік тому +23

    There are multiple inaccuracies in this video…. Some things are overstated, others are understated. It’s like an AI with hallucinations put this together with flawed data and a big headline just to get views.

    • @167mm167
      @167mm167 11 місяців тому

      ha ha ...never mind..just for fun...

    • @Philbyyyy
      @Philbyyyy 8 місяців тому +1

      Most likely AI

  • @Eminence_in_shadow
    @Eminence_in_shadow Рік тому +9

    Is not about hardware & money ~ is about the people 🇸🇬

  • @rebootmyth8753
    @rebootmyth8753 Рік тому +9

    You're just listing \data without actually providing any insight.
    And you just talked about navy capability without mentioning an entire category of vessels - submersibles.

  • @unideath32
    @unideath32 Рік тому +13

    Given the LST years of service and the evolving navy, a new set of amphibious carriers similar to USS American can replace the LST with the recent acquisition of f35b

  • @verycursedplane6557
    @verycursedplane6557 Рік тому +6

    The Missile is also wrong for the Victory Class. We have the Barak 1 which is less capable than the Barak 8 stated in the video

  • @ronaldhee6608
    @ronaldhee6608 Рік тому +14

    You completely left out the submarines.

  • @muhammadfahmi7159
    @muhammadfahmi7159 4 місяці тому

    5:50 The Sentinel class is previously a Fearless Class patrol vessel which was replaced by the Independence Class LMV. There will be new ships in years to come to replace the current Sentinel Class.

  • @roychingyunn8423
    @roychingyunn8423 11 місяців тому +2

    A proud singaporean here we got trains everywhere buses nereby places u can buy food which is always below 7 or so dollars and etc i love it here

  • @paulkami
    @paulkami Рік тому +180

    As a Singaporean and a military enthusiast, I feel that you over exaggerated the power of Singapore navy.

    • @AdvocatorOfTruthKing
      @AdvocatorOfTruthKing Рік тому +20

      Once the MRCVs are in service it won’t be an exaggeration.

    • @Dino-pk5hc
      @Dino-pk5hc Рік тому +5

      @@AdvocatorOfTruthKing yes, you guys are living in 'convenience' ... MRT, BUS, EVEN GETTING FOOD ....

    • @lingth
      @lingth Рік тому +36

      I think if you look at the size of the navy in comparison to the country's seas and or land mass. I would say it's much better now then before.
      In the past Singapore dun even have frigate level ships, we only had Missile Gunboats or Patrol vessels..and their anti air is a measly Manpad Mistral shoulder fired missile, or the 76mm gun.. and having 2 or 4 Harpoons. We didn't even have a ship that can launch a helicopter from in the past.
      So for Singapore to have 6 Frigates with a 32 VLS cells, I would say it's much improved since the 1980s.

    • @averydrunkidiot
      @averydrunkidiot Рік тому +1

      @@Dino-pk5hc yeah well being lazy isnt being bad it just makes life easier so you can do something that makes life hard

    • @CrossbredmiMiyang
      @CrossbredmiMiyang Рік тому +19

      As an enthusiastic yourself how enthusiastically educated you are ?

  • @gbsgamingproject7433
    @gbsgamingproject7433 8 місяців тому +2

    MRCV progam is The design is still an attack ship, I think this is more of a Destroyer type, even cruiser to cruise ships such as the Chinese Type 055, Italian DDX, German F128, and Spanish Destroyer Filht 3, all of which weigh 10,000 tons and above, which obviously have a lot of VLS. Maybe Singapore is still embarrassed to call it a Destroyer because it doesn't want to be said to have started an arms race in Southeast Asia, because none of its neighbors have started a Destroyer program, we all know that Singapore always wants to be the strongest in Southeast Asia and get the new nickname Israel of southeast Asia.

  • @mapperid
    @mapperid Рік тому +6

    As an Indonesian, I see Singapore as a small country with overkill and advanced military equipment
    as LKY said Singapore must be a thorn between their neighbors. It harbors major big companies worldwide so they don't mess up with them.

    • @chandrasegar9466
      @chandrasegar9466 Рік тому +2

      Survival for a tiny island...

    • @roychingyunn8423
      @roychingyunn8423 11 місяців тому +1

      Umm i a singaporean so i dunno what u trying to say but umm i respect whatever ur opnion is🫵🏻👍🏻😀

  • @MetalpigTV
    @MetalpigTV Рік тому +15

    Singapore has one of Southeast Asia's strongest warships

    • @bitubora2142
      @bitubora2142 Рік тому +3

      China & India laught at corner😂😂😂

    • @LimWJ2023
      @LimWJ2023 Рік тому +3

      Not the strongest in ASIA... But strongest in South East Asia In terms of military technology, training and equipments.. Sufficient to protect itself. It should get itself some small aircraft carriers from china to built a mobile mini airbases due to the countries small landmass in the event of long distance missiles bombardment on their land airfields.

    • @MetalpigTV
      @MetalpigTV Рік тому +1

      @@LimWJ2023 Thanks for correcting... edited already :P

    • @eddycannon9900
      @eddycannon9900 Рік тому

      Sophisticated & stealth anti-ship missile is 1000x cheaper than the slow moving warship

  • @ashmarsim
    @ashmarsim Рік тому +12

    You forgot to mention our submarines.

    • @AJ-eo1cn
      @AJ-eo1cn Рік тому +1

      This video is about warship. Which part you don't understand?

    • @scht03
      @scht03 Рік тому +7

      @@AJ-eo1cn Warships are generally divided into seven main categories, which are: aircraft carriers, cruisers, destroyers, frigates, corvettes, submarines, and amphibious warfare ships.

    • @ashmarsim
      @ashmarsim Рік тому +7

      Don't be rude, it is you than don't understand. A warship is any military vessel and this includes subs.

    • @AJ-eo1cn
      @AJ-eo1cn Рік тому

      @@scht03 Don't just cut and paste from google blindly. 👎👎 Submarine is not a ship. It's a boat. Learn your history.

    • @AJ-eo1cn
      @AJ-eo1cn Рік тому

      @@ashmarsim Whatever.. If you think it's rude ok then. 😂😂 Submarine is not a ship. Its a boat Mr Smart guy.😂😂😂

  • @Krisj1262
    @Krisj1262 11 місяців тому +7

    When it comes to a 'show down' Singpore bristles with some integrated defence systems that also includes the Airforce and PDF. It will make any aggressor think twice to take us on! Every Singaporean is geared to fight (including our NS). I was one of the first 1949 batch and am proud even now to step forward to defend! I come from a lineage which says ' we can die at six or 100 but to defend your country is your DUTY! '. UNITED WE WIL STAND !!!😊

    • @bong9476
      @bong9476 11 місяців тому

      1949! So how old are you now!

  • @GK2OCtroop1Frankie
    @GK2OCtroop1Frankie Рік тому +2

    Did you mention the SG218 Submarines?

  • @sohmingjian
    @sohmingjian Рік тому +11

    E Harpoon will soon be replace with Blue Spear ASM, also they carry both Aster 15 & 30, max rng for Aster 15 is 30KM (15km vs ASM) but max rng for Aster 30 is 100+ (30km only vs ASM)

    • @MarkzOng
      @MarkzOng Рік тому +6

      Shhh .. dun boast, something own self know can already lol.

    • @panda63725
      @panda63725 Рік тому +2

      Why are u leaking defense information? Wheather or not ur info is correct or wrong. Is Singaporen so easily spit defense info when watching a UA-cam video? Then it is easy to infiltrate Singapore defense by simply boasting your ego.

    • @sohmingjian
      @sohmingjian Рік тому

      @@panda63725 i dun need 2 tell u all this info r avail.

    • @hackereverss1
      @hackereverss1 11 місяців тому

      its not an secret. an simple search on the google,
      u will find those information already.@@panda63725

  • @justinng4970
    @justinng4970 11 місяців тому +1

    There are some inaccuracies in the video. Picture of RSS Supreme (73) is used for both Stalward and Supreme (which is misnamed). RSS Vigour also has Supreme as it's picture. Mistakes among others.

  • @philipchan79
    @philipchan79 Рік тому +11

    I hope the new MRCVs are 10K tons. The ship will have 64-cell VLS, up to 24 Blue Spear missiles and OTO 127/64 LW Gun.

    • @CrossbredmiMiyang
      @CrossbredmiMiyang Рік тому +6

      It should be close to 12k tons but look at the design and model it’s should be equipped with 32 cells VLS with 128 SAM , blue spear missiles, oto gun etc but it will be serve some sort like a landing platform for unmanned aircraft. It’s neither a destroyer nor frigate but a multi purpose or multi role launcher… anyway it will serve to be a formidable force.

    • @compounding999
      @compounding999 Рік тому +1

      @@CrossbredmiMiyang when will the new MRCVs be in service?

    • @rayray2015
      @rayray2015 Рік тому

      2030
      @@compounding999

    • @philipchan79
      @philipchan79 Рік тому +1

      @@CrossbredmiMiyang The new MRCVs are confirmed 8,800 tons. So no more 64-cell VLS, maybe just 48/32-cell VLS. No more 127mm naval gun, just OTO Melara 76 mm gun. China navy new 052DL is also around 8000 tons.

    • @sergeantblue6115
      @sergeantblue6115 11 місяців тому +1

      From the designs(in my view) it’s basically a constellation class frigate in terms of armament, 1 lightweight gun, 32 vls and 8-24 harpoons.
      Realistically would be about 16 harpoons for me, unless ur America, nobody is insane enough to put that many on a single vessel, even if it’s big.
      Also vls would probably not be the mark41 so they’ll stick to the European ones that are not quad packable so still 32 max capacity.

  • @CCLow-jr7um
    @CCLow-jr7um 11 місяців тому +1

    How is it the 6 submarines they have are not mentioned?

    • @mingtang2680
      @mingtang2680 11 місяців тому

      subs are highly classified

  • @PangKenLim
    @PangKenLim Рік тому +11

    This is something Sarawak should be able to looking forward to preparing for and build up own navy and protect own sea territory.

    • @zehahaha603
      @zehahaha603 Рік тому

      Does sarawak not have the royal malaysian navy for that?

    • @muhammadafiqsyahmi3408
      @muhammadafiqsyahmi3408 Рік тому

      ade je...tapi biasela semangat "S2S"😴@@zehahaha603

    • @PangKenLim
      @PangKenLim Рік тому +4

      @@zehahaha603 Do you think Malaya navy able to protest Sarawak, Sarawak must leave the illegal federation of Malaysia someday if you understand MA63 was null and void.

    • @zehahaha603
      @zehahaha603 Рік тому +2

      @@PangKenLim I have heard of the MA63 constitutional issue, can’t say whether I believe the Malaysian navy can protect sarawak

    • @PangKenLim
      @PangKenLim Рік тому +2

      @@zehahaha603 Several times in history was Sarawak rangers saving their life this is the real history.

  • @maxjek2374
    @maxjek2374 4 місяці тому

    What is a landing ship tank?

  • @Notsosmartyetnotsostupid
    @Notsosmartyetnotsostupid Рік тому +4

    For show only as a deterrent. Singapore cannot get into a war. Its safe haven / hub status needs to stay out of conflicts.

    • @michaellee3314
      @michaellee3314 11 місяців тому +1

      Not sure what you are talking about. Definitely not for show only. What if deterrence failed? And who say we cannot get into a war? Are we not training very hard for it. We may not want war but what if it finds us and we got not choice?

  • @reybombay4095
    @reybombay4095 Рік тому +10

    You can tell if a country is rich by the size and quality of its military forces.

  • @tre_techie
    @tre_techie Рік тому +1

    Maybe buy a few carriers and tons of fighter jets since it is so rich?

    • @muhdnasriii5468
      @muhdnasriii5468 Рік тому

      i dont think carriers are needed for sg since its small and the airforce fleet should be more than enough to defend sg as well

    • @LimWJ2023
      @LimWJ2023 Рік тому

      Good suggestions.. They can purchase small carriers as mobile airbases to backup due to it's limited landmass in the event of a sudden long distance missiles bombardment.

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 11 місяців тому

      @@LimWJ2023 Who's going to defend it if everyone is serving on the carrier? It's a bad idea, and not even new. Thailand has an aircraft carrier but no one gives it any respect now do they? Most people don't even know about it! Aircraft carriers are not deus ex machina solutions, you can very easily fuck up with carriers too.

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 11 місяців тому

      Oh goodie, we can be Thailand number two. Go look up what happened to their carrier.

  • @engkiatpoh9696
    @engkiatpoh9696 6 місяців тому

    Hapoon missile is subsonic and weapon range is only 200-300km, they can only reach 200km in 10-15min. While more modern Mach 3 and above anti ship missile can cover 300-400km in 6-8min, which give target less time to deploy counter measurement
    And its Aster 15 may not be able a defend against modern anti missile that travel minimum Mach 3 - Mach 6 at 300-400km range.

  • @SShiJie
    @SShiJie 11 місяців тому +1

    I sometimes imagine Singapore to have an Aircraft Carrier (I know its impossible because of Maintanence)

    • @kokhowe
      @kokhowe 11 місяців тому

      Not just maintenance, but the support ships needed to protect the aircraft carrier will be too costly for Singapore to handle.

    • @Clipsdiscover
      @Clipsdiscover 11 місяців тому

      We also don’t need one

    • @raytan1661
      @raytan1661 8 місяців тому

      Will also spend more good salary on these talented personnel with promotion regularly😢

  • @Aeyo
    @Aeyo Рік тому +12

    Singapore doesn't have powerful navy but Singapore has powerful people.

  • @25foxbat1
    @25foxbat1 Рік тому

    the subs were left out 😮 ?

  • @temasek65
    @temasek65 Рік тому +6

    How formidable are the vessels to withstand anti ship ‘Neptune’ missiles?

    • @stanislavmarinov
      @stanislavmarinov 11 місяців тому

      The Formidable-class frigates have excellent PESA radars to detect the R-360"Neptune", 16 Aster-30 & 16 Aster-15 SAMs to destroy it, an ECM system to "blind" it and Sagem Dagaje decoy system to "deceive" it. In total - 4 layers of defense.

  • @steve-iw2bg
    @steve-iw2bg Рік тому +1

    Aster 30 range is 120km aster 15 is 30km

  • @toraguchitoraguchi9154
    @toraguchitoraguchi9154 Місяць тому

    how about the submarines ? The strongest component of the Sg Navy???

  • @fabianeng8605
    @fabianeng8605 Рік тому +2

    You left out the subs.

  • @oceanbreeze89
    @oceanbreeze89 Рік тому +10

    To have a strong military, your country has to be trustworthy and a longstanding US ally. In this regard, the US will be willing to sell their technological advanced weapons to your military.

    • @ejt2287
      @ejt2287 Рік тому +4

      It really depends, our weapons are sourced from all over the world

    • @benganchan1420
      @benganchan1420 Рік тому

      White men speaks with forked tongue said a native chieftain in 1840 as the american army stole the native lands. It was euphemistically called the frontier wars
      america continued stealing diego garcia in the indian ocean and guam in asia and hawaii in 1899.
      america in 2024 is planning to steal the island of taiwan 🇹🇼 ( it was proclaimed republic of china in 1949 ) from the chinese people
      descendants of land thieves anthony blinken , joe biden speaks with forked tongue like his predecessors in 1840. It’s becoming a bad habit.

    • @entrydenied
      @entrydenied 11 місяців тому +1

      @@ejt2287Also make our own

    • @avipant3467
      @avipant3467 11 місяців тому

      I don’t agree so

  • @aave865
    @aave865 Рік тому

    You missed out the submarines

  • @nickooi2072
    @nickooi2072 Рік тому +1

    because all its neighbor are not Warlord like the west esp USA. Singapore are just lucky to have kind and tolerance neighbor in South East Asia.

    • @ultimaxed8239
      @ultimaxed8239 Рік тому +4

      You sort of forgot Konfrontasi, Indon pirates, Mahathir and his countless shenanigans and many more

  • @roychingyunn8423
    @roychingyunn8423 11 місяців тому

    For those wondering how singapore so rich it is partially cuz it is stationed right between the sea trading routes between india and china so many ships stop here we also maintain good relations with neighbours

  • @112313
    @112313 11 місяців тому

    Compared to the regional navies, yes, singspore naval power is quite good....but Singapore naval power is ill suited for offensive purposes. Its an almoat fully defensive navy, with a brown navy assets.

  • @maggottyblackie
    @maggottyblackie 11 місяців тому

    Can I just tell Behind Asia team, it's Singapore Dollars..Not Singaporean Dollars.. and its Singapore Navy, not Singaporean Navy.. we don't call SAF Singaporean Armed Forces.. same logic..

  • @jasonlim2536
    @jasonlim2536 11 місяців тому

    Plans also for a vessel for the F35s.

  • @lordarcadius
    @lordarcadius Рік тому

    Barak 8 is developed by India & Israel jointly.

  • @rumasg
    @rumasg Рік тому

    What about the submarines

  • @chandrasegar9466
    @chandrasegar9466 Рік тому +1

    Fine ..narations..how long can we last in war situtations..isnt manpower an issue..retrain our retirees and make us feel wanted ...am fit at 74...could be the last trigger...worth it...

  • @michaellee3314
    @michaellee3314 6 місяців тому

    Time to put the Harpoon in the museum.

  • @novavortex7763
    @novavortex7763 11 місяців тому

    I hate how everyone talks about how good we are, and rarely ever talks about how shit some stuff can be. live in this place long enough, you'll start to see a lot of flaws.

  • @maxjek2374
    @maxjek2374 4 місяці тому

    Conventional wars between countries will be rare in future. Why are we spending so much on national defence for S'pore?

  • @palmtide
    @palmtide Рік тому +1

    Good analysis.

  • @justfantasic
    @justfantasic Рік тому +3

    Singapore has a navy too😊

    • @DreamyCheshire-up9rf
      @DreamyCheshire-up9rf Рік тому +1

      Yeah. It's navy is even stronger than Taiwan. A much bigger island.

  • @kokyihong
    @kokyihong 11 місяців тому

    probably wouldnt say "... one of the most powerful in all across Asia..." :x Asia is huge .... but it is always better to live harmoniously with our SEA region neighbours.

  • @worldview2888
    @worldview2888 11 місяців тому +1

    I am from Singapore and CHEERS to this video

  • @clothokaftan
    @clothokaftan 11 місяців тому

    it should be noted that the members of the ASEAN coalition are not competing with eachother and are not at odds with one another, we're all militarizing because of our mainland neighbor who doesnt know when to stop bullying and somehow forgot why we're called the "first island chain defensive line", so now its time to remind them of that reason. to china: if you "fafo" then dont blame us for whats coming.
    in the background: 7th fleet aggressively playing fortunate son*
    sidenote: considering how much of a joke china's rocket force is and how china actually publicly declared war on graft, the situation in china is so bad that they likely dont have any chance of doing anything. their navy and army cant advance without their rocket force since the whole point of their rocket force was to suppress land based defensive installations to make land invasions not turn into a turkey shoot. which i kind of find funny since most of the defenses we have are mobile, not static targets, and china's rocket forces dont have smart missiles that can track moving targets across hundreds of kilometers, not that it would matter since they're all filled with water, kudos to the chinese soldiers who thought to syphon rocket fuel to cook stew.
    lmao they have such outdated ways of thinking, typical of russia's unruly stepbrother.

    • @bong9476
      @bong9476 11 місяців тому

      You're certainly worried about a JOKE of an enemy duh! No?

  • @charlestanch9360
    @charlestanch9360 10 місяців тому

    Bedok-Class Mine countermeasure vessels - Bedok should be pronounced as BUR-DOKE

  • @victorwee2145
    @victorwee2145 Рік тому +1

    Submarines…….?

  • @EdwinTSY
    @EdwinTSY Рік тому

    the last frigate is called RSS Supreme.. not stalwart

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 Рік тому

      And when they upgrade it, they'll be calling it the Super Supreme! lol.

  • @studboy2456
    @studboy2456 Рік тому

    They ain't using harpoons now.

    • @___Danny___
      @___Danny___ Рік тому +2

      We still have and still using but they are in the process of phasing out.

  • @城邦寡人
    @城邦寡人 Рік тому +1

    All these videos made depicting how strong Singapore armed force is are made by foreigner. I wonder how this video editor got that USD770 billion asset under GIC when the Singapore government do not disclose asset amount under GIC due to national security. Kindly stop making this kind of video just to get your views and money but making our neighbours feel uneasy. Good money for you but ill effects suffer by Singaporean. This is not good.

  • @twnll
    @twnll Рік тому

    We need a mini aircraft carrier

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 11 місяців тому

      Yeah, we can buy Thailand's second hand /s
      Don't do stupid stuff, just because aircraft carriers are spectacular does not mean they will always work. Thailand has an aircraft carrier yet no one is thinking that the Thai navy is dominant in the region.

    • @RenorOilamus
      @RenorOilamus 4 місяці тому

      ​@@danielc2701 not aircraft carrier it's helicopter carrier👍 in thailand

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 4 місяці тому

      @@RenorOilamus The squadron of 7 Harrier jets that used to work off it in the past says otherwise. They reclassed it after Thailand lost all the Harriers but it did work as an aircraft carrier for a short period of time.

  • @midsaid2161
    @midsaid2161 Рік тому +1

    Im a malaysian and have no doubt that singaporean navy is strong but the way u explain n exagerating the strength of singaporean navy like we malaysian, indonesian, philipine and thailand only have medieval warships. Singaporean navy is strong but not that kind american navy strong😂

    • @philipchan79
      @philipchan79 Рік тому +4

      When will all the 5 Maharaja Lela-class frigates be fully operational ?

    • @midsaid2161
      @midsaid2161 Рік тому

      @@philipchan79 wait let me call n ask the malaysian navy general u bastard

    • @WasLostButNowAmFound
      @WasLostButNowAmFound Рік тому +1

      Malaysia's biggest threat will always be Indonesia. That is the truth. Five Power Defence Agreement is just for that.

  • @whiskeytango1744
    @whiskeytango1744 11 місяців тому

    Had a chance to see one of the LST docked for Fleet Week. It was a very impressive ship to see. Well thought out and had much capabilities. They also build them from the ground up. Most respect to them and their Navy.

  • @JustOnce-qw9jz
    @JustOnce-qw9jz Рік тому +5

    I find it quite offensive when you say; "toe to toe, to it's neighbour"; and you even show a logo of Philippine Navy when the reality it is more like the Philippine Navy has no match against the Singaporean counterpart😅

    • @gangstagummybear3432
      @gangstagummybear3432 Рік тому

      Who needs a navy when if anyone dares, you have to answer to the US?

    • @paranoya733
      @paranoya733 Рік тому

      @@gangstagummybear3432 Singapore only need to come out with better deal for US to leave the philippines since singapore have more bargaining power.. easy peasy

    • @robertfernandez9135
      @robertfernandez9135 Рік тому +1

      @@paranoya733 Yes but, the pact between US and PH isn't about money, it goes way back with history including the world wars. And US won't be leaving PH soon because if they do, China will be free to do whatever it wants which I think the US don't want.

    • @MalaysiaBoleh448
      @MalaysiaBoleh448 Рік тому

      ofcrz Sg cannot mention the nearby neighboring country like indonesia and malaysia . coz for sure SG no match with them😂😂

    • @paranoya733
      @paranoya733 Рік тому +1

      @@robertfernandez9135 That historical pact was based on context of WW2 to keep an eye on Soviet & Japan, now it's a different context you know how the chinese import their energy?? What strait the chinese pass through?? Malacca Strait, when u think of war think of Chinese fuels on how they need to run their ships & fighter jets, if US could block chinese fuels in malacca strait they'll no longer need your area, it's cheaper for the US to not just blocking energy for chinese military but also chinese basic needs... that will impact more on china, but off course singapore won't be that stupid, but that's the power of bargaining that singapore has compared to the philippines

  • @rawbird5341
    @rawbird5341 5 місяців тому

    Wtf is this guy talking about, The Singapore Warship?? Does he mean Singapore navy?

  • @James-mc5hc
    @James-mc5hc 5 місяців тому

    Warships are easy targets for air , sea and underwater drones. The future of defense is in land, sea , air and underwater drones.
    These changes are good for Singapore as Singapore has the technology to produce all these drones en masse.
    Every man and woman in Singapore must be able to handle drone warfare. Every man and woman in Singapore must have a designated drone specialty. That is the only way to go and this defense is advantageous for Singapore's means and effectiveness. The technology is within the grip of Singapore's manufacturing premises. Time to change .
    Mr Singapore president. Tq.
    Another thing Mr Singapore president, think of a nuclear powered ship based desalination station which provides 50 years of cheap fuel and produces cheap water for Singapore. It will definitely work. Get the Chinese to build and Singaporeans to manage it. 50 years of cheap water.

  • @sikhandtakerakhuvar3372
    @sikhandtakerakhuvar3372 Рік тому

    25 knots is awfully slow for a frigate.

  • @simroysten7963
    @simroysten7963 10 місяців тому

    I guess Singapore is arming to the teeth because I am told they have some stupid neighbors who are under the impression that it is very easy to overwhelm by just using long range artillery. The one problem they have to consider is this. "Where the hack is the response coming from"? What I think Singapore have are "Earth Satellite Stations" in various friendly countries which can communicate with the Singapore Satellites on low orbit 24/7. Also the roaming submersibles in close proximities. A Singaporean friend also told me, that all their air patrols are long range and accompanied by air tankers and early warning CAC aircraft. Also most of their air assets are equipped with electronic jammers.

  • @JoshuaHoe
    @JoshuaHoe Рік тому +1

    6:29 B Dog class 😂😂😂😂

  • @teonghaipoh9361
    @teonghaipoh9361 6 місяців тому

    More powerful wepon can protect country 😊 very important got good leader and grovmemt officer

  • @lord_raindrops237
    @lord_raindrops237 11 місяців тому

    Bro really pronounced Bedok as bee-dock

  • @jimbaranresidence8
    @jimbaranresidence8 Рік тому +2

    Helo... dun talk loud... if the military strength is strong? Y open flood gate for FT? Do ur HW on the boys SHRINK for the last 30yrs..... Even SG born but their parent r FT, wats makes the total defence commitment?

  • @benganchan1420
    @benganchan1420 Рік тому +1

    afghanistan is an asian superpower, it defeated tang dynasty china in the 9th century , defeated britain in the 19th century , defeated russia in 1987, defeated america in August 2021 . afghans defeated their enemies by wearing them out in the field , russia lasted 10 years while america was worn down in 20 years of fighting
    Defeating four erstwhile enemies is a neat military record.
    Small countries can learn from afghans how to bully big countries 😂😅😂

    • @___Danny___
      @___Danny___ Рік тому +1

      didn’t realise afghanistan navy is so strong 😆

    • @desmondkwang5945
      @desmondkwang5945 11 місяців тому

      @@___Danny___Afghanistan is so poor...so poor that the invaders have no reason to stay

  • @ryanzhangjunxi
    @ryanzhangjunxi 11 місяців тому

    "strong navy"
    Singapore has:
    0 aircraft carriers
    0 cruisers
    0 destroyers
    Yes very powerful.

  • @engchoontan8483
    @engchoontan8483 Рік тому

    Implementation failure and not dependable = individuals

  • @sureshpillay1187
    @sureshpillay1187 7 місяців тому

    Singapore is world class

  • @lfaverby
    @lfaverby Рік тому +5

    No doubt the ships are good, but the frigates is not among the strongest.

  • @ryokolynn6948
    @ryokolynn6948 Рік тому

    Don't ask for much....just compare to India navy ( another asian country ).....Singapore so call 'Best' frigates (Only 6) .... can deal with India's currently operational ships like ...2 aircraft carriers,
    1 Ballistic missile submarine (SSBN), 12 destroyers (9 are operational after year 2000 ) and 12 frigates .... so STOP boosting ....Singapore navy is very weak in Asia !

    • @LimWJ2023
      @LimWJ2023 Рік тому +4

      Singapore's navy is only for protecting itself against aggressor.. Not to attack others or provoke others. In Asia it is not the strongest.. However In SEA.. they are strong enough for it's own survival against aggressor from that region.. I think the video exaggerate many areas. If you are comparing Singapore with countries that had nuclear military technologies, hypersonic missiles and stealth fighters... That's wrong category to put Singapore to compare with. It is not realistic for Singapore to join countries like China or US in the quest to be a superpower and they only purchase to upgrade their arm forces according to their defence needs in the region so as not to create an arm race or panic among it's neighbours. Maybe you can compared India with countries that had the same arsenal as India.

    • @colorpeace-fo1sp
      @colorpeace-fo1sp Рік тому

      Not all countries in Asia made it to the list of the World's Strongest Navy In The World 2023 but Singapore is listed among the 36 countries.

  • @1liner
    @1liner 11 місяців тому

    Singapore is very good in bragging or salesman talk in almost everything

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 11 місяців тому

      ....
      .......
      ...........
      You do know the ships are French, right?

  • @enkh3897
    @enkh3897 Рік тому

    I believe Singapore should consider destroyer class ship. Our country is small do not need cruiser, battleship or aircraft carrier. But destroyer might be useful in some area for the near future.

    • @MrDebmey
      @MrDebmey Рік тому +3

      not necessary, the frigates are just as good, we don't need to deploy far out

    • @philipchan79
      @philipchan79 Рік тому

      @@MrDebmey Yes, we need to deploy further out.

    • @MrDebmey
      @MrDebmey Рік тому

      @@philipchan79 what for? how far out?

    • @DreamyCheshire-up9rf
      @DreamyCheshire-up9rf Рік тому

      ​@@philipchan79Isn't the range of 3500 miles of the frigates, far out enough for tiny Singapore ?

    • @philipchan79
      @philipchan79 Рік тому

      @@MrDebmey To protect Singapore's sea trade route and escort important ships.

  • @dustbean
    @dustbean 11 місяців тому

    what you see is what our government allows...its what you dont see by Singapore Technology

  • @muhammadyusuf-mx5lb
    @muhammadyusuf-mx5lb 11 місяців тому

    When you have money things were easier to create and maintenanced ..

  • @maxjek2374
    @maxjek2374 5 місяців тому

    Wars between sovereign countries will be rare in the future. But the war in Ukraine has shown the opposite.

  • @lijmes
    @lijmes Рік тому

    You dont need a navy to win a sea war. You just need strong relations with The USA. Just ask Ukraine...

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 11 місяців тому

      So... when did they win the Ukraine war?

    • @avipant3467
      @avipant3467 11 місяців тому

      Not necessarily required to have good relations with US

  • @kwpf
    @kwpf Рік тому +4

    By saying Singapore's Navy can stand toe-to-toe with the Philippine Navy, I started to doubt your information.

    • @potatopotato175
      @potatopotato175 Рік тому +1

      yea i know right.. Singapore's navy is obviously way better than the Philippines Navy

    • @bennysamuelkoh9463
      @bennysamuelkoh9463 Рік тому

      Why not...in terms of quality and 5th generation technologies

    • @robertfernandez9135
      @robertfernandez9135 Рік тому +6

      ​@@bennysamuelkoh9463Simply because Philippine Navy is weaker than what the singapore Navy have. With all those ships I think I agree too🤣🤣🤣

    • @gangstagummybear3432
      @gangstagummybear3432 Рік тому

      @@robertfernandez9135 There is no proof of what is "stronger" or not, neither is truly tested in any real world war scenario, so all of these "new ships" and your thumbs ups means nothing, if SIngapore's supposed "military superiority" over PH's is proven with actual substance, which has yet to ever have hapened.

    • @robertfernandez9135
      @robertfernandez9135 Рік тому

      ​@@gangstagummybear3432 Boy you can measure the strength of one country's military by the military equipments, resources, etc. they have. You saying you can't when they are not tested in real world is just wrong.
      This kind of measurement of military strength is measured by how much military assets do they have over another country. The one you're saying is another way of measuring the strength of a military in "ACTUAL" combat..
      LOOK AT THE WAR IN UKRAINE, comparing what Ukraine and Russia have, Russia is a far superior in terms of military assets. The only thing that saved Ukraine is that they were bullied and were given aid by other countries, and of course Russia being sanctioned by a lot.

  • @angpeter1075
    @angpeter1075 10 місяців тому

    SG navy..quality over quantity

  • @providencez9496
    @providencez9496 11 місяців тому

    Having good equipment is useless when singapore soldiers are meh..

  • @Johnneytan
    @Johnneytan Рік тому +1

    先进的武器是优势,然而,真正的优势是人民,战争的真正偉力在人民,全国人民上下一致抗敌,不畏侵略者,打退侵略者,这才是正道.

  • @munster1404
    @munster1404 Рік тому +2

    Hardware : weapons vs software : soldier mindset are very different concepts. I can tell you for sure that I will try to run if I sniff even one whiff of war. Even if I cannot run, I wouldn't put myself fully into the fight.
    And yeah, I served 9 years in the Singapore Navy. But I'm not a patriotic person. I work because I get paid. The Singapore Armed Forces paid for my education, I paid them back with my time.

  • @AngKhaHo-d7g
    @AngKhaHo-d7g 11 місяців тому

    Man i live in Singapore ☠️

  • @stormysky5177
    @stormysky5177 Рік тому

    attrition and replacement rate of assets is the key. the rest rubbish.

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 11 місяців тому

      Name me one navy that can replace ships easily? Even China needs a year to replace a ship from scratch and you can easily lose a ship within a week or less in heavy combat. Heavy equipment have ALWAYS been hard to replace, which is why you end up fighting with your existing stockpile, not possible future construction. At best, comparing to WWII, you can only replace about 5 traches of ships x number of shipyards you have.

  • @hafizolanwar7887
    @hafizolanwar7887 Рік тому +1

    Overhype

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 11 місяців тому

      Yeah, I kind of agree. It's a decent warship but not spectacular. It won't blow up as soon as someone sees it but neither is it going to sink the whole PLAN. The only real outstanding part that I can see is how well thought out the loadout and concept of operations is. Other than that, it isn't very spectacular.

  • @tkdhanesh01
    @tkdhanesh01 Рік тому +1

    Great! Unless they encounter the super sonic brahmos !!!

    • @LimWJ2023
      @LimWJ2023 Рік тому

      What They have are enough to protect itself in SEA.. Unless India had evil intention of annexing singapore😂

    • @___Danny___
      @___Danny___ Рік тому

      Imagine when they are grasping for oxygen and we are the one who donated to them . Now they want to return us with their brahmos 😆😆 See , we shouldn’t welcome these ceca into our island.

  • @Wrv_1313
    @Wrv_1313 Рік тому

    You should consider making a video on Indian navy

  • @fkh3100
    @fkh3100 Рік тому +3

    Yes, our Navy is one of the strongest in Asia.
    and we have technological expertise..
    We have proven that we need just 80 men to man the La Fayette Frigate. and French admiral were impressed by our talents. French frigate normally need 100 to 200 men
    We are going to have Joint Multi Mission Ship (JMMS) which looked like aircraft carrier ,and will carry F-35B aircrafts and helicopters.
    We have money but lack qualified manpower necessary to have strong navy . Our young Singaporeans cannot take hardship , and want to have easy life..

    • @Callsign-Blade_RunnerSG
      @Callsign-Blade_RunnerSG Рік тому +1


      With your government’s half hearted attempts in dealing with companies discriminating practices in improving the lives of working parents, I doubt the local general population would be convinced to have children if any at all… ​​⁠
      The biggest defence should be to INCREASE YOUR local BIRTH RATES first.

    • @panda63725
      @panda63725 Рік тому

      And you should not say anything about the defense information on UA-cam. If you are PoW, you will say anything not by torture, but by boasting your ego.

  • @kevintony4652
    @kevintony4652 Рік тому

    Bro can u do a video on Indian Navy

  • @siddarthgrewal
    @siddarthgrewal 10 місяців тому

    Did MINDEF tell you you???😂😂😂😂😂

  • @danielc2701
    @danielc2701 Рік тому

    Hello, youtube? Your AI went rogue and made an "infomercial" again! lol
    This whole thing is like a brainless cut and paste without any insight at all.

  • @taipangwong356
    @taipangwong356 9 місяців тому

    Strongest in the world. Thanks Singapore Tourism Board for propaganda.

  • @raymondtay3532
    @raymondtay3532 Рік тому +2

    I think Singapore should buy a China 055D Arms with Rail Gun, Laser systems and powerful missiles. 💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯♥️♥️

    • @LimWJ2023
      @LimWJ2023 Рік тому

      Along with the China's small carriers.

    • @Nothingmore1313
      @Nothingmore1313 9 місяців тому

      Pls…. La, Quality is not assured. 😮