Singapore’s Littoral Solution

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 жов 2024
  • By Eric Wertheim
    July 2024 Proceedings Vol. 150/7/1,457

КОМЕНТАРІ • 97

  • @tommytstang
    @tommytstang 3 місяці тому +52

    Being an ex Singapore Senior Naval Engineering Specialist, I have proudly served my nation for 11 years. Even back in the 90s the RSN was already considered one of the most modern and forward looking naval force in the SE Asia with all sorts of sophisticated technology and weapon systems of its time. Over the last 2 decades, it is now one of the most formidable sea military forces in the region surpassing my bigger countries in SE Asia.

    • @pringlessourcream9527
      @pringlessourcream9527 3 місяці тому +2

      Tjing kum siah you😊

    • @kennethschlegel870
      @kennethschlegel870 2 місяці тому +4

      When i was in the US Navy it was an amazing experience to Visit Singapore, both times we pulled into Changi.

  • @eatdriveplay
    @eatdriveplay 3 місяці тому +30

    In its basic configuration, these LMVs are capable of providing littoral anti-surface, anti-air protection and 8 ships are on rotation to conduct 24/7 patrolling around Singapore waters. With an integrated bridge-CIC, options for less than lethal or lethal weapons + capacity for a secondary CIC + modular weapons and mission systems that can be fitted for any threat.... these are future proof vessels for decades.

  • @lingth
    @lingth 3 місяці тому +34

    Its intended replacement was for Patrol class vessels.. so its not intended to be heavily armed and not for Anti ship or Anti submarine roles.. probably more anti piracy roles and against small boats. The heli deck is a welcome addition, because in the past, the only Helicopter landing capable ship was the Landing Ship Tank in the RSN, but now helicopters can land on Formidable Frigates and now LMVs also.

    • @SPIndustriesF23
      @SPIndustriesF23 2 місяці тому +1

      They also have MICA launch capabilities so they are also capable of defending Singapore's airspace.

    • @DM-mv4eq
      @DM-mv4eq Місяць тому

      @@SPIndustriesF23 Not even close. VL-MICA is point defense.

  • @thomasvilla6109
    @thomasvilla6109 2 місяці тому +4

    Those are fine-looking ships.

  • @EricK-mj7kr
    @EricK-mj7kr 3 місяці тому +10

    In fact he LCS do work with the LMVs in the region. They regularly make port calls at Changi naval base.

  • @JoshuaC923
    @JoshuaC923 3 місяці тому +8

    Pretty cool to see USNI feature the RSN

  • @ding24_
    @ding24_ 3 місяці тому +87

    thanks for featuring my country 💪🏼

  • @EricK-mj7kr
    @EricK-mj7kr 3 місяці тому +9

    Cool ship names!

    • @catland88
      @catland88 2 місяці тому

      I believe the LMV names were selected from public name submissions!

  • @josephwielinski4383
    @josephwielinski4383 3 місяці тому +5

    Please do a video of the Endurance-class landing platform dock

  • @philipchan79
    @philipchan79 3 місяці тому +9

    Singapore also have a similar type like US Navy Independence class LCS . Its the Singapore Navy's specialised marine craft.

    • @lagrangewei
      @lagrangewei 3 місяці тому +5

      no, LCS is trash. Singapore does not build trash.

    • @Logic807
      @Logic807 3 місяці тому

      @@philipchan79 are you referring to something in the future?

    • @philipchan79
      @philipchan79 3 місяці тому

      @@Logic807 No.

  • @ziq2188
    @ziq2188 3 місяці тому +1

    Well presented, 👍👏

  • @capespring
    @capespring 3 місяці тому +7

    add 4 ASM and it becomes a corvette.

    • @eatdriveplay
      @eatdriveplay 3 місяці тому +15

      It can... because of its modular arhictecture. It can fit several 20-foot standard containers under the heli deck - each station with pre-configured cable points to integrate any kind of systems/weapons/sensors, for whatever mission needed.

  • @lukex19
    @lukex19 3 місяці тому

    Little Singapore used Galvanized Industry and innovational veneers to expand its defense fleet.

  • @khayramsyar554
    @khayramsyar554 2 місяці тому +2

    Only one thing I hate about these ships, their wake is so strong it makes my vessel a theme park ride 🤬

  • @NickyKDChaleunphone
    @NickyKDChaleunphone Місяць тому

    This is something the USCG should be getting for the Pacific

  • @nonamenoname9468
    @nonamenoname9468 3 місяці тому +7

    Please have the AI pronounce "littoral" correctly just once I beg

  • @Logic807
    @Logic807 3 місяці тому +18

    I think the value is that Thales radar

    • @calvin6429
      @calvin6429 3 місяці тому +1

      it looks damn awkward, how much better is the radar? we should just buy 2nd ships from other countries, why spend more money to build unless we are selling to other countries

    • @benktlofgren4710
      @benktlofgren4710 3 місяці тому +7

      Jobs jobs jobs, better for the economy if you invest in your people instead of all cash going abroad. You also invest in capability and know-how.
      The know-how is the hardest and most expensive thing to replace if you let it go, that is why Sweden still has jets, subs, and warship programs.

    • @logic8673
      @logic8673 3 місяці тому

      @@benktlofgren4710 I don't know what you mean, Thales is a major investor in SG. They are employing 1000 to add to their 2000. Furthermore, they are hiring high-value engineers. Typically Singapore's decision-making is multi-dimensional. For such sensitive cutting-edge r and d work, it is an achievement for SG. they are doing work here. Military equipment and men etc, means nothing without radar.

  • @bokwoon
    @bokwoon 3 місяці тому +4

    I do not wish to see any AI generated videos like this in my feed

  • @timodee_art
    @timodee_art 3 місяці тому +1

    LiT-TOR-AL!!! LIT-TOR-AL!!! “Say my name!” It’s LIT-TOR-AL, not LIT-ER-AL. ReCaptcha should honestly use this as the “are you a robot question”. Every single one of these bots gets it wrong. Every. Single. Time. 😂

  • @syang1116
    @syang1116 2 місяці тому

    who is supposed to be potentisl enemy of Singapore?

  • @RenorOilamus
    @RenorOilamus Місяць тому

    Wow umilaw Yung like amazing😂

  • @Serai-l7z
    @Serai-l7z 3 місяці тому

    Props for the Gundam inspired names

    • @iatsd
      @iatsd 3 місяці тому +8

      They're all Royal Navy names

  • @chandrachurniyogi8394
    @chandrachurniyogi8394 2 місяці тому

    off shore patrol vessels should be regulated worldwide in terms of it's size & foot print . . . for e.g. the maximum displacement of OPVs should be no more than 630 ton (900 ton loaded) . . . armed with dual tube 553 mm torpedo launcher . . . RIM-162 ESSM 4-cell canister launcher . . .

  • @vicbanks9079
    @vicbanks9079 2 місяці тому +1

    nice info, although your voiceover is clearly AI generated. LITTORAL is not pronounced 'literal'.

  • @leon-z6r
    @leon-z6r 2 місяці тому

    Philippine Gov. Eintein watch here!

  • @pikminlord343
    @pikminlord343 3 місяці тому

    Wow!

  • @ropeburnsrussell
    @ropeburnsrussell 3 місяці тому +11

    Why couldnt the US build 30 of these?
    Why dont we buy 6 now as a stopgap for the frigate?

    • @NewmaticKe
      @NewmaticKe 3 місяці тому +20

      This is a corvette sized vessel. I don't think the US operates such class of smaller vessels.

    • @eseetoh
      @eseetoh 3 місяці тому +22

      Tks for the compliment. But i believe as good as these LMVs are, they were not designed for long-range ocean conditions, something the U.S. Navy might need. Perhaps something like the Gowind class convettes might be a better fit.

    • @Wick9876
      @Wick9876 3 місяці тому +12

      They're unarmed. Not absolutely, but 12 point defense AA missiles and a basic gun isn't a serious threat to a warship. They have no helicopter. No ability to self deploy from San Diego to Singapore. On the plus side, they're almost unmanned (23 vice 115 for a Freedom class or 200 for a Constellation). They're nice for what they are but that's more coast guard than combat vessel.

    • @ropeburnsrussell
      @ropeburnsrussell 3 місяці тому +14

      @@Wick9876 they are better armed than the LCS

    • @Wick9876
      @Wick9876 3 місяці тому

      @@ropeburnsrussell The LCS is mostly a carrier. It has the helo and firescout, and loads of space and support for USVs or other flexible payloads. Also, it has 21 vice 12 point defense missiles, the 57mm is pretty similar to the 76mm, and, again, lots of space and support for other packages. So it's armament is sad but not worse.

  • @williamwatkins1849
    @williamwatkins1849 3 місяці тому +6

    Better than the American navy.

    • @NoStressMarkets
      @NoStressMarkets 3 місяці тому +4

      lmao

    • @boonnamgoh8914
      @boonnamgoh8914 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@NoStressMarkets it's a low bar given all the issues the US navy littoral vessels are facing 😂 but Singapore did choose a good European partner to save on developing from scratch, and integrated good proven solutions to have a cost-effective solution (rather than try to push the envelope with inventions on all fronts).

  • @richardmeo2503
    @richardmeo2503 3 місяці тому +5

    Nice looking ships. Surprised they have english names

    • @shawnc5188
      @shawnc5188 3 місяці тому

      We were only a British possession then Crown Colony for 150 years, so most us still bow to white people and call you ‘sahib’ 🤪

    • @eatdriveplay
      @eatdriveplay 3 місяці тому +28

      hmm.. Singapore is an English speaking country. We grow up speaking English from nursery.. LOL!

    • @blackstorm6416
      @blackstorm6416 3 місяці тому

      😂😂😂

    • @comedycord123
      @comedycord123 3 місяці тому +2

      Singapore used to be British colony.

    • @eatdriveplay
      @eatdriveplay 3 місяці тому +9

      @@comedycord123 yes… which laid a foundation for us. But it was our policy post-independence that we decided to adopt English as our working and education language. Everything is in English. :)

  • @douglasang3527
    @douglasang3527 3 місяці тому +1

    Why the old version 76mm OTO Melara Gun ?! Crazy ! 😅

    • @eseetoh
      @eseetoh 3 місяці тому +22

      @@douglasang3527 oh cause these guns were transferred from a previous decommissioned class of ships. Don't forget that these LMVs were not meant to be blue water combatants so weaponry are defensive in nature. These older oto melara 76mm guns will suffice.

    • @eatdriveplay
      @eatdriveplay 3 місяці тому +1

      @@eseetoh nah, they bought new guns for sure.

    • @eseetoh
      @eseetoh 3 місяці тому

      @@eatdriveplay nono, i remember reading somewhere that they repurpose the guns from the previous 12 ships Fearless-class Patrol Vessels (PV)s to the LMVs.

    • @eatdriveplay
      @eatdriveplay 3 місяці тому +5

      @@eseetoh obviously not… why? Because SIPRI records new gun purchases transfers. Also out of the 11 surviving PV - 2 were donated to Brunei, 4 are still in service as MSRV, meaning there are at most 5 unaccounted/scrapped. There are 8 LMVs. So how can it be? Singapore won’t be stupid to put old guns in a brand new ship.

    • @50centswarlord
      @50centswarlord 3 місяці тому

      @@eseetoh you get it wrong , they are all new guns from OTO . My 4th son serve in one of the ship as a gunner and a weapon specialist and I can confirm that .

  • @logicae4096
    @logicae4096 2 місяці тому +1

    Only the US Navy in 2024 cannot build an integrated mast....

    • @jm2453
      @jm2453 Місяць тому

      All masts are integrsted. Positioning to avoid interference is in every design. We found composite stealth masts to be of limited value in high end vombatants with focus on the combat system and weight managment.

  • @nicb.1213
    @nicb.1213 2 місяці тому

    Why the respective authority did not address the loss of few hundred billion reserve that disappeared and also debts beyond 800 billion gone to. Why the authority still concentrates on its weaponry, for what? Preparing to go to war with the New King of Malaysia and the Future President of Indonesia, Probawa >>>????

    • @NewmaticKe
      @NewmaticKe 2 місяці тому +7

      Time to take your meds

  • @EnglishScripter
    @EnglishScripter 3 місяці тому +1

    US navy has already loss.

    • @iatsd
      @iatsd 3 місяці тому +4

      It looks like English, but there's no content in that sentence. Even AI's can usually do better.

    • @EnglishScripter
      @EnglishScripter 3 місяці тому

      @@iatsd Alright.

  • @michaelr4858
    @michaelr4858 Місяць тому

    Maybe the USN can learn something from these ships!